DOCSLIB.ORG

South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Tmdl Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Tmdl Report Illinois Bureau of Water Environmental P.O. Box 19276 Protection Agency Springfield, IL 62794-9276 December 2007 IEPA/BOW/07-027 SOUTH FORK SANGAMON RIVER/LAKE TAYLORVILLE WATERSHED TMDL REPORT Printed on Recycled Paper THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Contents Section 1 Goals and Objectives for South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed (0713000702) 1.1 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Overview............................................. 1-1 1.2 TMDL Goals and Objectives for South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed ..................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Report Overview.............................................................................................. 1-3 Section 2 South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Description 2.1 South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Location............... 2-1 2.2 Topography...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Land Use.......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.4 Soils.................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.4.1 South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Soil Characteristics.................................................................................... 2-3 2.5 Population ........................................................................................................ 2-4 2.6 Climate and Streamflow .................................................................................. 2-4 2.6.1 Climate............................................................................................... 2-4 2.6.2 Streamflow......................................................................................... 2-5 Section 3 Public Participation and Involvement 3.1 South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Public Participation and Involvement......................................................................... 3-1 Section 4 South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Water Quality Standards 4.1 Illinois Water Quality Standards...................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Designated Uses............................................................................................... 4-1 4.2.1 General Use........................................................................................ 4-1 4.2.2 Public and Food Processing Water Supplies ..................................... 4-1 4.3 Illinois Water Quality Standards...................................................................... 4-1 4.4 Potential Pollutant Sources .............................................................................. 4-3 Section 5 South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Characterization 5.1 Water Quality Data .......................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.1 Stream Water Quality Data................................................................ 5-1 5.1.2 Lake and Reservoir Water Quality Data............................................ 5-2 5.1.2.1 Lake Taylorville............................................................... 5-2 5.1.2.1.1 Total Phosphorus.......................................... 5-3 5.1.2.1.2 Manganese .................................................... 5-4 5.1.2.1.3 Dissolved Oxygen......................................... 5-4 i FINAL REPORT Table of Contents Development of Total Maximum Daily Loads South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed 5.2 Reservoir Characteristics ................................................................................. 5-4 5.2.1 Lake Taylorville................................................................................. 5-5 5.3 Point Sources................................................................................................... 5-5 5.3.1 Municipal and Industrial Point Sources............................................. 5-5 5.3.1.1 South Fork Sangamon River Segment EO13................... 5-6 5.3.1.2 Other ................................................................................ 5-6 5.3.2 Mining Discharges............................................................................. 5-6 5.4 Nonpoint Sources............................................................................................. 5-6 5.4.1 Crop Information............................................................................... 5-7 5.4.2 Animal Operations............................................................................. 5-7 5.4.3 Septic Systems ................................................................................... 5-8 5.5 Watershed Studies and Other Watershed Information..................................... 5-9 Section 6 Approach to Developing TMDL and Identification of Data Needs 6.1 Simple and Detailed Approaches for Developing TMDLs.............................. 6-1 6.2 Approaches for Developing TMDLs for Stream Segments in the South Fork Sangamon/Lake Taylorville Watershed .................................................. 6-1 6.2.1 Recommended Approach for DO TMDLs for Stream Segments without Major Point Sources ............................................................. 6-1 6.2.2 Recommended Approach for Manganese and Boron TMDLs .......... 6-2 6.3 Approaches for Developing TMDLs for Lake Taylorville.............................. 6-2 6.3.1 Recommended Approach for Total Phosphorus and Dissolved Oxygen TMDLs................................................................................. 6-2 6.3.2 Recommended Approach for Manganese TMDLs............................ 6-3 Section 7 Methodology Development for the South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed 7.1 Methodology Overview................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.1 QUAL2K Overview........................................................................... 7-1 7.1.2 Empirical Analysis of Manganese Overview .................................... 7-2 7.1.3 BATHTUB Overview........................................................................ 7-2 7.2 Methodology Development............................................................................. 7-2 7.2.1 QUAL2K Model................................................................................ 7-2 7.2.1.1 QUAL2K Inputs...............................................................7-3 7.2.1.2 QUAL2K Calibration.......................................................7-5 7.2.2 Empirical Analysis of Manganese ..................................................... 7-5 7.3 BATHTUB Model Development and Input .................................................... 7-6 7.3.1 Global Inputs...................................................................................... 7-6 7.3.2 Reservoir Segment Inputs.................................................................. 7-6 7.3.3 Tributary Inputs................................................................................. 7-6 7.4 BATHTUB Confirmatory Analysis................................................................. 7-7 ii FINAL REPORT Table of Contents Development of Total Maximum Daily Loads South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Section 8 Total Maximum Daily Loads for the South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed 8.1 TMDL Endpoints............................................................................................. 8-1 8.2 Pollutant Source and Linkage .......................................................................... 8-1 8.3 Allocation......................................................................................................... 8-2 8.3.1 South Fork Sangamon River Manganese TMDL .............................. 8-2 8.3.1.1 Loading Capacity............................................................. 8-2 8.3.1.2 Seasonal Variation........................................................... 8-2 8.3.1.3 Margin of Safety .............................................................. 8-2 8.3.1.4 Waste Load Allocation .................................................... 8-3 8.3.1.5 Load Allocation and TMDL Summary............................ 8-3 8.3.2 South Fork Sangamon River DO TMDL........................................... 8-3 8.3.2.1 Loading Capacity............................................................. 8-3 8.3.3 Total Phosphorus TMDL for Lake Taylorville.................................. 8-4 8.3.3.1 Loading Capacity............................................................. 8-4 8.3.3.2 Seasonal Variation........................................................... 8-4 8.3.3.3 Margin of Safety .............................................................. 8-4 8.3.3.4 Waste Load Allocation .................................................... 8-5 8.3.3.5 Load Allocation and TMDL Summary............................ 8-5 Section 9 Implementation Plan for the South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Lake Taylorville Watershed 9.1 Adaptive Management..................................................................................... 9-1 9.2 Implementation Actions and Management Measures for DO in the South Fork Sangamon River ...................................................................................... 9-2 9.2.1 Point Sources of Oxygen-Demanding Materials ..............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Plankton of the Sangamon of 1929
    STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION DIVISION OF THE NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY THEODORE H. PRISON, Chiel Vol. XIX. BULLETIN Article V. The Plankton of the Sangamon River in the Summer of 1929 BY SAMUEL EDDY PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS URBANA, ILLINOIS NOVEMBER, 1931 STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION M. F. Walsh, Director BOARD OP NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION M. F. Walsh. Chairman William Trelease, Biology Joiix W. Alvord, Engineering Heney C. Cowles, Forestry Charles M. Thompson, Represent- Edson S. Bastin, Geology ing the President of the Univer- William A. Notes, Chemistry sity of Illinois STATE NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY DIVISION Theodore H. Prison, Chief H. C. Oesterling, Editor ScHNBPp & Barnes, Printers Springfield, III. 1931 66752—1200 VoLiME XIX. Article V. THE PLANKTON OF THE SANGAMON RIVER IN THE SUMMER OF 1929 Samuf.l Eddy The Sangamon River, a small river in the central part of Illinois, has special interest to students of aquatic biology because it exhibits in a remarkable way the effects of the installation of a sewage treatment plant in alleviating pollution and at the same time the effects of the erection of a dam to impound water for munici))al and industrial uses. The present study is an attempt to determine to what extent these ef- fects are reflected by changes in the abundance of certain kinds of microscopic organisms, collectively called ]5lankton, which live sus- pended in the water. As is well known, some kinds of plankton organ- isms, if present in sufficient numbers in reservoirs, may give diagree- able flavors to the water ; other kinds may aid in the natural purification of polluted waters: and in streams and lakes generally plankton plays a role of more or less importance as food for larger organisms, includ- ing ti.shes.
    [Show full text]
  • NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Natural Resources Are Positive Components of Any De- Velopment and Add Value Where Integrated Appropri- Ately Into Development Projects
    8 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Natural resources are positive components of any de- velopment and add value where integrated appropri- ately into development projects. This harmonious coexistence begins with a good understanding of our natural environment. This chapter will examine topics such as air quality, water resources, energy resources, floodplains, stream bank erosion, local food and urban gardening. It will also identify the potential environmental concerns or threats such as gas pipelines and hydraulic fracturing.DRAFT 117 KEY FINDINGS Bloomington faces two challenges in managing the public water sup- As calculated by the Ecology Action Center, as of 2008 residents of ply. The short-term need is to mitigate the effects of high nitrate lev- Bloomington accounted for 31% of greenhouse gas emissions pro- els in Lake Bloomington. This requires reducing nitrate infiltration duced by electricity use. 61% of emissions were from commercial from watershed and agricultural runoff, and ongoing improvements users, 5% from industry, and 3% from local government use of elec- to water treatment systems. The long-term challenge is adding public tricity. Private sector users produce nearly all emissions caused by water supply sources to meet the need of a growing community, by transportation. preserving current resources and identifying new sources for water. The McLean County Landfill #2 is scheduled for a 2017 closure upon The growth of the City of Bloomington has often been achieved by reaching its capacity of nearly 4 million cubic yards. Annual volume converting farmland into new development. Historically, the City in the landfill has been 90,000 tons, equaling 300 tons per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoosiers and the American Story Chapter 3
    3 Pioneers and Politics “At this time was the expression first used ‘Root pig, or die.’ We rooted and lived and father said if we could only make a little and lay it out in land while land was only $1.25 an acre we would be making money fast.” — Andrew TenBrook, 1889 The pioneers who settled in Indiana had to work England states. Southerners tended to settle mostly in hard to feed, house, and clothe their families. Every- southern Indiana; the Mid-Atlantic people in central thing had to be built and made from scratch. They Indiana; the New Englanders in the northern regions. had to do as the pioneer Andrew TenBrook describes There were exceptions. Some New Englanders did above, “Root pig, or die.” This phrase, a common one settle in southern Indiana, for example. during the pioneer period, means one must work hard Pioneers filled up Indiana from south to north or suffer the consequences, and in the Indiana wilder- like a glass of water fills from bottom to top. The ness those consequences could be hunger. Luckily, the southerners came first, making homes along the frontier was a place of abundance, the land was rich, Ohio, Whitewater, and Wabash Rivers. By the 1820s the forests and rivers bountiful, and the pioneers people were moving to central Indiana, by the 1830s to knew how to gather nuts, plants, and fruits from the northern regions. The presence of Indians in the north forest; sow and reap crops; and profit when there and more difficult access delayed settlement there.
    [Show full text]
  • LOWER SANGAMON River AREA ASSESSMENT Volume4
    Volume4 Socio-Economic Profile Environmental Quality Archaeological Resources LOWER SANGAMON RIvER AREA ASSESSMENT '~ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LOWER SANGAMON RIVER AREA ASSESSMENT VOLUME 4 I Part I: Socio-Economic Profile Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Realty and Environmental Planning Division of Energy and Environmental Assessment 524 South Second Springfield, Illinois 62701 (217) 524-0500 Part II: Environmental Quality Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Scientific Research and Analysis Illinois State Water Survey 2204 Griffith Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 (217) 244-5459 Waste Management and Research Center . One East Hazelwood Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 (217) 333-8940 Part ill: ArchaeologicalResources Timothy Roberts and Steven R. Abler Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office ofScientific Research and Analysis Illinois State Museum Spring & Edward Streets Springfield, Illinois 62706 (217) 782-7387 2000 300 I Printed by the authority of the State of Illinois I I. 1\\ I\1 Other CTAP Publications Lower Sangamon River Area Assessment Vol. I Geological Resources Vol. 2 Water Resources Vol. 3 Living Resources The Lower Sangamon River Basin: An Inventory ofthe Region's Resources - 22-page color booklet Descriptive inventories and area assessments are also available for the following regions: Rock River Lower Rock River Cache River Sinkhole Plain Mackinaw River Sugar-Pecatonica Rivers Illinois Headwaters Vermilion River Illinois Big Rivers Upper Sangamon River Fox River Du Page River
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Tallula and Springfield Quadrangles
    DESCRIPTION OF THE TALLULA AND SPRINGFIELD QUADRANGLES. a By E. W. Shaw and T. E. Savage, INTRODUCTION. of the tributaries of the Mississippi flow in valleys that are been many shifts from deposition to erosion, some of which irregular in width and depth and have indirect courses. have involved the whole province. POSITION AND GENERAL RELATIONS. Drainage. The northern and northeastern parts of the The pre-Cambrian formations are made up of igneous and The Tallula and Springfield quadrangles are bounded by Glaciated Plains lie in the basin of the Great Lakes and the metamorphic rocks having a complex structure. Upon the meridians 89° 30' and 90° and by parallels 39° 45' and 40°, upper St. Lawrence and the remainder in the basin of the Ohio deeply eroded and planed surface of these rocks rest all the including therefore one-eighth of a square degree of the earth's and upper Mississippi. The divide between these drainage later strata the shales, sandstones, limestones, and uncon- surface, an area, in that latitude, of 458.44 square miles. They basins is irregular and somewhat indefinite and is so low as to solidated rocks that outcrop throughout the province except in are situated in west-central Illinois (see fig. 1) and comprise a be scarcely perceptible. that part where the pre-Cambrian rocks themselves lie at or large part of Sangamon County and smaller portions of Mor­ The province contains several sheets of glacial drift, formed near the surface. gan, Cass, Menard, and Logan counties. The principal town in as many different ice epochs.
    [Show full text]
  • 1988007W.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF FIGURES n LIST OF TABLES w LIST OF APPENDICES iv ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 1 I OBJECTIVES OF STUDY 3 ∎ METHODS 3 I DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA 7 RESULTS 7 SPECIES ACCOUNTS 13 Federally Endangered Species 13 Federal Candidate Species 15 I Proposed State Endangered Species 15 Proposed State Threatened Species 16 Watch List Species 16 Other Species 17 I Introduced Species 33 ∎ DISCUSSION 33 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 35 LITERATURE CITED 36 I I I I LIST OF FIGURES PAGE Figure 1 . Collection sites in the Little Wabash River drainage, 1988 6 Figure 2. The Little Wabash River and its tributaries 8 Figure 3. Number of individuals collected liver per site in the Little Wabash River (main channel) in 1988 12 I Figure 4 . Number of species collected per site in the Little Wabash River (main channel) in 1988 12 I I I I I I LIST OF TABLES PAGE Table 1 . Comparison of the mussel species of the Little Wabash River reported by Baker (1906) and others [pre-1950], Fechtner (1963) [1951-53], Parmalee [1954], Matteson [1956], INHS [1957-88], and this study 4 Table 2 . Collection sites in the Little Wabash River drainage, 1988 5 Table 3 . Total,rank order of abundance and percent composition of the mussel species collected live in the Little Wabash River drainage, 1988 9 Table 4. Site by site listing of all mussel species collected in the Little Wabash River drainage, 1988 10-11 Table 5. Site by site listing of all mussel species collected by M .R . Matteson in the Little Wabash River, 1956 14 I I iii LIST OF APPENDICES PAGE Appendix I .
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln's New Salem, Reconstructed
    Lincoln’s New Salem, Reconstructed MARK B. POHLAD “Not a building, scarcely a stone” In his classic Lincoln’s New Salem (1934), Benjamin P. Thomas observed bluntly, “By 1840 New Salem had ceased to exist.”1 A century later, however, a restored New Salem was—after the Lincoln Memorial, in Washington, D.C.—the most visited Lincoln site in the world. How this transformation occurred is a fascinating story, one that should be retold, especially now, when action must be taken to rescue the present New Salem from a grave decline. Even apart from its connection to Abraham Lincoln, New Salem is like no other reconstructed pioneer village that exists today. Years before the present restoration occurred, planners aimed for a unique destination. A 1920s state-of- Illinois brochure claimed that once the twenty- five original structures were rebuilt on their original founda- tions, it would be “the only known city in the world that has ever been restored in its entirety.”2 In truth, it is today the world’s largest log- house village reconstructed on its original site and on its build- ings’ original foundations. It is still startling nearly two hundred years later that a town of more than a hundred souls—about the same number as lived in Chicago at that time—existed for only a decade. But such was the velocity of development in the American West. “Petersburg . took the wind out of its sails,” a newspaperman quipped in 1884, because a new county seat and post office had been established there; Lincoln himself had surveyed it.3 Now the very buildings of his New Salem friends and 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Creek Sangamon River
    Regional Fecal Coliform TMDL on Salt Creek of Sangamon River and Lower Sangamon River Watersheds Flat Branch Tributary Stage 3 Final Report Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Watershed Management Section Planning Unit September 2005 http://www.epa.state.il.us/water/tmdl/ September 27, 2005 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .....................................................................................................................................1 2. Physical Settings .............................................................................................................................1 2.1. Listed Water Bodies .................................................................................................................1 2.2. Watershed Characteristics ........................................................................................................3 Land Use and Land Cover............................................................................................................3 Soils..............................................................................................................................................5 Hydromodification .......................................................................................................................6 Climate .........................................................................................................................................7 Populations...................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Sangamon River
    . : .. !!._._.------'- v-,-ol_u_m_e----:l .• Geology . LOWER SANGAMON RIVER . ~.'. ~ '. ' " ~T", , _.~.. .' AREA ASSESSMENT '~ OEP.-,RTMENT Of NATURAL RESOURCES LOWER SANGAMON.RIVER AREA ASSESSMENT VOLUME 1: GEOLOGY Illinois Department ofNatural Resources Office of Scientific Research and Analysis State Geological Survey Division 615 East Peabody Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 (217) 333-4747 2000 300 Printed by the authority of the State of Illinois . Other CTAP Publications Lower Sangamon River Area Assessment Vol. 2 Water Resources Vol. 3 Living Resources Vol. 4 Socio-Economic Profile, Environmental Quality, Archaeological Resources The Lower Sdngamon River Basin: An Inventory ofthe Region's Resources - 22-page color booklet Descriptive inventories and area assessments are also available for the following regions: Rock River Lower Rock River Cache River Sinkhole Plain Mackinaw River Sugar-Pecatonica Rivers Illinois Headwaters VermiIion River Illinois Big Rivers Upper Sangamon River Fox River Du Page River Kankakee River Thorn Creek Kishwaukee River Prairie Parklands Embarras River Kaskaskia River Upper Des Plaines River Lower Des Plaines River Illinois River Bluffs Calumet Area Spoon River Lower Des Plaines River Driftless Area Also available: Illinois Land Cover, An Atlas, plus CD-ROM Inventory ofEcologically Resource-Rich Areas in Illinois EcoWatch '98, Annual Report of the Illinois EcoWatch Network Illinois Geographic Information System, CD-ROM of digital geospatial data All CTAP and Ecosystems Program documents are available from the DNR Clearinghouse at (217) 782-7498 or TDD (217) 782-9175. Selected publications are also available on the World Wide Web at http://dnr.state.il.us/ctap/ctaphome.htm, or http://dnr.state.il.us/c2000/manage/partner.htm, as well as on the EcoForum Bulletin Board at I (800) 528-5486 or (217)782-8447.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 3.1 Streams and Watersheds
    k e e r Upper Vermilion River C Map 3.1 s Weston Panther Creek Meadows k Gridley o o El Paso Chenoa R North Fork Vermilion River Streams ® and Watersheds V e r m ii ll ii o n McLean County, Illinois Miles Rooks Creek T 0 1.25 2.5 5 7.5 10 u r k e y C r k e e e re k Legend C ck u South Fork Vermilion River B Rivers and Streams S ix Lakes and Detention M Lexington i le Salt Creek/Upper Sangamon River Basin C r ee k Buck Creek-Mackinaw River Kickapoo Creek Pleasant Hill North Fork Salt Creek Cropsey R Hudson H ock M a c k ii n a w enline Creek Sugar Creek Creek Upper Salt Creek Carlock Sixmile Creek-Mackinaw River West Fork Sugar Creek k e Mud Creek-Mackinaw River e ver r Colfax Mackinaw Ri C Anchor Mackinaw River Basin Towanda d e Henline Creek-Mackinaw River k o Buck Creek-Mackinaw River o ek r re M C r C on Cooksville Henline Creek-Mackinaw River uga ey C k S ree For k est Danvers Little Mackinaw River-Mackinaw River W eek Normal ll Cr Money Creek s Mi Money Creek Little Mackinaw River-Mackinaw River King Merna Mud Creek-Mackinaw River West Fork Sugar Creek Panther Creek Sixmile Creek-Mackinaw River Bloomington Vermilion RIver Basin San North Fork Vermilion River gamon Holder River Arrowsmith Rooks Creek Covell Ellsworth Stanford U p p e r S a n g a m o n South Fork Vermilion River Drummer Creek-Sangamon River Saybrook Upper Vermilion River ek Upper Sangamon River Basin re Shirley Gillum C S a l t r S a l t Drummer Creek-Sangamon River ga u S Kickapoo Creek eek Downs er Cr Timb Sugar Creek North Fork Salt Creek Upper Salt Creek Roads and Streets Incorporated Areas McLean County boundary Leroy Bellflower ek re C lt P a r S McLean a Heyworth i k r r i o e F k e C th e r r r e o C e N t k Osman l a S McLean County Regional Data Sources: River basin and watershed data from National Resources Conservation Service of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Habitat and Otter Population Status Alan Woolf Southern Illinois University Carbondale
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Final Reports Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory 7-1997 Survey of Habitat and Otter Population Status Alan Woolf Southern Illinois University Carbondale Richard S. Halbrook Southern Illinois University Carbondale D. Todd Farrand Southern Illinois University Carbondale Chad Schieler Southern Illinois University Carbondale Ted Weber Southern Illinois University Carbondale Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cwrl_fr W-122-R-3. Recommended Citation Woolf, Alan; Halbrook, Richard S.; Farrand, D. Todd; Schieler, Chad; and Weber, Ted, "Survey of Habitat and Otter Population Status" (1997). Final Reports. Paper 7. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cwrl_fr/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Final Reports by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SURVEY OF HABITAT AND OTTER POPULATION STATUS FINAL REPORT Federal Aid Project W-122-R-3 Submitted by: Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, SIUC Presented to: Division of Wildlife Resources Illinois Department of Natural Resources Principal Investigators Alan Woolf Richard S. Halbrook Graduate Research Assistants/Staff D. Todd Farrand (Graduate Assistant) Chad Schieler (Graduate Assistant) Ted Weber (Researcher II) July 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES. iii LIST OF FIGURES.. v LIST OF APPENDICES. vii NEED. 1 OBJECTIVES. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.. 10 JOB 1.1. OTTER HABITAT CRITERIA AND MONITORING.. 11 OBJECTIVES.. 11 INTRODUCTION.. 11 METHODS. 12 Habitat Characterization. 12 Otter Monitoring. 23 RESULTS. 24 Habitat Characterization. 24 Otter Monitoring. 25 DISCUSSION.
    [Show full text]
  • HERE I HAVE LIVED Recreating the Land Of
    HERE I HAVE LIVED Recreating the Land of Case 1: Lincoln’s New Salem "Mill at New Salem, 1829", 1950. Fred H. Turner Wood Block Prints (MS 974), Folder 1. When James Rutledge and John Camron first settled on a bluff overlooking the Sangamon River in 1828, they petitioned the state for permission to dam the river and construct a grist- and sawmill. By October 1829, the venture proved so successful that Rutledge and Camron hired a surveyor to plat a new town around the mill site: New Salem. Quickly becoming a local center for commerce, New Salem attracted farmers and merchants from hundreds of miles away—including a young Abraham Lincoln aboard a flatboat bound for New Orleans that found itself stuck on the Rutledge dam in 1831. This rare woodblock print by Champaign artist Fred Turner depicts the Rutledge-Camron mill as it was reconstructed in the 1930s atop its original foundation based on archaeological records. Camp New Salem “All-Day Program” flyer, undated. Civilian Conservation Corps Collection (MS 537), Folder 1. The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), established by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933 at the height of the Great Depression, was a federal relief program designed to provide temporary public service work, housing, and medical care to single, unemployed men aged 18 to 25. The program benefited more than 92,000 workers in Illinois, including many at Camp New Salem. Established in 1934 with 206 men, the camp built upon the Old Salem Lincoln League’s work by accurately reconstructing the Rutledge-Camron mill as well as seven of the village’s original log structures.
    [Show full text]