DOCSLIB.ORG

Wayne County, Illinois Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2017 Countywide MHMP Wayne County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wayne County, Illinois Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2017 Countywide MHMP Wayne County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Wayne County, Illinois Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2017 Countywide MHMP Wayne County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Wayne County, Illinois Adoption Date: -- _______________________ -- Primary Point of Contact Secondary Point of Contact Jeff Jake Sarah Mann Coordinator Executive Director Wayne County Emergency Management Agency Greater Wabash Regional Planning Commission 505 SW 10th Street 10 West Main Street Fairfield, Illinois 62837 Albion, Illinois 62806 Phone: (618) 262-6715 Phone: (618) 445-3612 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] i Wayne County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Acknowledgements The Wayne County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan would not have been possible without the feedback, input, and expertise provided by the County leadership, citizens, staff, federal and state agencies, and volunteers. We would like to give special thank you to the citizens not mentioned below who freely gave their time and input in hopes of building a stronger, more progressive County. Wayne County gratefully acknowledges the following people for the time, energy and resources given to create the Wayne County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan. Wayne County Board Steve Ehrhart, Chairman Gorden Endsley Vern Hudson, Sr. Robert Pearce Ronnie Windland Larry “Eddie” Barbre Deborah Bradham Jerry Donoho Ben Gardner Amy Polland Brent Marguire Gary Sloan Royce Carter Shirley MacDavid ii Wayne County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Section 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 Section 2. Planning Process ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Timeline ......................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Jurisdiction Participation Information ........................................................................................... 2 2.3 Planning Team Information ........................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Public Involvement ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.5 Neighboring Community Involvement .......................................................................................... 5 2.6 Review of Technical Documents .................................................................................................... 5 2.7 Adoption by Local Government ..................................................................................................... 5 Section 3. County Profile ............................................................................................................................ 6 3.1 County Background ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Demographics ............................................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Economy and Industry ................................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Land Use and Development Trends............................................................................................. 10 3.5 Climate ........................................................................................................................................ 10 3.6 Topography ................................................................................................................................. 11 3.7 Major Lakes, Rivers, and Watersheds .......................................................................................... 12 Section 4. Risk Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Hazard Identification ................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.1 Existing Plans ....................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.2 National Hazard Records ..................................................................................................... 13 4.1.3 FEMA Disaster Information ................................................................................................. 14 4.1.4 Hazard Ranking Methodology ............................................................................................. 16 4.1.5 Risk Priority Index ................................................................................................................ 16 4.1.6 Jurisdictional Hazard Ranking .............................................................................................. 17 4.2 Vulnerability Assessment ............................................................................................................ 18 4.2.1 Asset Inventory .................................................................................................................... 18 4.3 Risk Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 19 4.3.1 GIS and Hazus-MH ............................................................................................................... 19 4.3.2 Tornado Hazard ................................................................................................................... 20 4.3.3 Thunderstorm Hazard ......................................................................................................... 27 4.3.4 Earthquake Hazard .............................................................................................................. 29 iii Wayne County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan 4.3.5 Winter Storm Hazard ........................................................................................................... 40 4.3.6 Hazardous Material Storage and Transportation Hazard .................................................... 42 4.3.7 Flooding Hazard………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..50 4.3.8 Dam and Levee Failure…………………….………………………………………………………………………….…...56 4.3.9 Drought and Extreme Heat Hazard……………………………………………………………………………………59 Section 5. Mitigation Strategies ............................................................................................................... 62 5.1 Existing Hazard Mitigation Policies, Programs and Resources ..................................................... 62 5.1.1 Successful Mitigation Projects ............................................................................................. 62 5.1.2 National Flood Insurance Program ...................................................................................... 62 5.1.3 Jurisdiction Ordinances ....................................................................................................... 64 5.1.4 Fire Insurance Ratings ......................................................................................................... 65 5.2 Mitigation Goals………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 65 5.3 Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Strategies .................................................................................... 66 5.4 Prioritization of Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Strategies .......................................................... 74 Section 6. Plan Implementation and Maintenance .................................................................................. 77 6.1 Implementation through Existing Programs ................................................................................ 77 6.2 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Updating the MHMP ...................................................................... 77 Definitions ................................................................................................................................................... 79 Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................... 81 Appendices .................................................................................................................................................. 83 Appendix A. MHMP Meeting Minutes ..................................................................................................... 84 Appendix B. Local Press Release and Newspaper Articles ....................................................................... 95 Appendix C. Adopting Resolutions .......................................................................................................... 96 Appendix D. Historical Hazards................................................................................................................ 97 Appendix E. List of Critical Facilities......................................................................................................... 98 Appendix F. Critical Facilities Map ........................................................................................................... 99 iv Wayne County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 1. Introduction Hazard mitigation is any sustained action to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to human life and property from hazards. The Federal Emergency
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1988007W.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF FIGURES n LIST OF TABLES w LIST OF APPENDICES iv ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 1 I OBJECTIVES OF STUDY 3 ∎ METHODS 3 I DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA 7 RESULTS 7 SPECIES ACCOUNTS 13 Federally Endangered Species 13 Federal Candidate Species 15 I Proposed State Endangered Species 15 Proposed State Threatened Species 16 Watch List Species 16 Other Species 17 I Introduced Species 33 ∎ DISCUSSION 33 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 35 LITERATURE CITED 36 I I I I LIST OF FIGURES PAGE Figure 1 . Collection sites in the Little Wabash River drainage, 1988 6 Figure 2. The Little Wabash River and its tributaries 8 Figure 3. Number of individuals collected liver per site in the Little Wabash River (main channel) in 1988 12 I Figure 4 . Number of species collected per site in the Little Wabash River (main channel) in 1988 12 I I I I I I LIST OF TABLES PAGE Table 1 . Comparison of the mussel species of the Little Wabash River reported by Baker (1906) and others [pre-1950], Fechtner (1963) [1951-53], Parmalee [1954], Matteson [1956], INHS [1957-88], and this study 4 Table 2 . Collection sites in the Little Wabash River drainage, 1988 5 Table 3 . Total,rank order of abundance and percent composition of the mussel species collected live in the Little Wabash River drainage, 1988 9 Table 4. Site by site listing of all mussel species collected in the Little Wabash River drainage, 1988 10-11 Table 5. Site by site listing of all mussel species collected by M .R . Matteson in the Little Wabash River, 1956 14 I I iii LIST OF APPENDICES PAGE Appendix I .
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Habitat and Otter Population Status Alan Woolf Southern Illinois University Carbondale
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Final Reports Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory 7-1997 Survey of Habitat and Otter Population Status Alan Woolf Southern Illinois University Carbondale Richard S. Halbrook Southern Illinois University Carbondale D. Todd Farrand Southern Illinois University Carbondale Chad Schieler Southern Illinois University Carbondale Ted Weber Southern Illinois University Carbondale Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cwrl_fr W-122-R-3. Recommended Citation Woolf, Alan; Halbrook, Richard S.; Farrand, D. Todd; Schieler, Chad; and Weber, Ted, "Survey of Habitat and Otter Population Status" (1997). Final Reports. Paper 7. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cwrl_fr/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Final Reports by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SURVEY OF HABITAT AND OTTER POPULATION STATUS FINAL REPORT Federal Aid Project W-122-R-3 Submitted by: Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, SIUC Presented to: Division of Wildlife Resources Illinois Department of Natural Resources Principal Investigators Alan Woolf Richard S. Halbrook Graduate Research Assistants/Staff D. Todd Farrand (Graduate Assistant) Chad Schieler (Graduate Assistant) Ted Weber (Researcher II) July 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES. iii LIST OF FIGURES.. v LIST OF APPENDICES. vii NEED. 1 OBJECTIVES. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.. 10 JOB 1.1. OTTER HABITAT CRITERIA AND MONITORING.. 11 OBJECTIVES.. 11 INTRODUCTION.. 11 METHODS. 12 Habitat Characterization. 12 Otter Monitoring. 23 RESULTS. 24 Habitat Characterization. 24 Otter Monitoring. 25 DISCUSSION.
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Tmdl Report
    Illinois Bureau of Water Environmental P.O. Box 19276 Protection Agency Springfield, IL 62794-9276 December 2007 IEPA/BOW/07-027 SOUTH FORK SANGAMON RIVER/LAKE TAYLORVILLE WATERSHED TMDL REPORT Printed on Recycled Paper THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Contents Section 1 Goals and Objectives for South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed (0713000702) 1.1 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Overview............................................. 1-1 1.2 TMDL Goals and Objectives for South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed ..................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Report Overview.............................................................................................. 1-3 Section 2 South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Description 2.1 South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Location............... 2-1 2.2 Topography...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Land Use.......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.4 Soils.................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.4.1 South Fork Sangamon River/Lake Taylorville Watershed Soil Characteristics.................................................................................... 2-3 2.5 Population .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impacts of Oil Field Brines in Southeastern Clay County, Illinois
    557 ILLINOIS GEOLOGICAL IL6of (\ 1989-3 SURVEY LIBRARY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF OIL FIELD BRINES IN SOUTHEASTERN CLAY COUNTY, ILLINOIS Edited by; Bruce R. Kensel and Dennis P. McKenna with contributions by: J. Roger Adams (2)^ Allison R. Brigham^-^) Steven L. Burch(2) Billy K. Cook(2) Barbara R. Cline^^) Paul C. Heigold(\) Louis R. Iverson^-^) Douglas E. Laymon^-^) Edward A. Lisowski^-^) Vickie L. Poole (^-) Raman K. Raman (^) Edward C. Smith (1) John D. Steele(l) Christopher J. Stohr(l) Stephen Whitaker(^) Illinois State Geological Survey Champaign, Illinois OPEN FILE SERIES 1989-3 (^*^ Illinois State Geological Survey -^^lilinois State Water Survey (^H.llinois Natural History Survey ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 3 3051 00006 9728 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF OIL FIELD BRINES IN SOUTHEASTERN CLAY COUNTY, ILLINOIS Edited by: Bruce R. Hensel and Dennis P. McKenna with contributions by: J. Roger Adams (2) ^ Allison R. Brighain(3) ^^y Steven L. Burch^^) \P ^, Billy K. Cook(2) (JC-' r^ Barbara R. Cline(l) .q"^ <^ Paul C. Heigold(l) o^ o^^^ ^ <^^ <^^^ Louis R. Iverson(3) _ Douglas E. Laymon^-^) ^v. Edward A. Lisowski^-^) ^'^ Vickie L. Poole(l) Raman K. Raman (2) Edward C. Smith (1) John D. Steele(l) Christopher J. Stohr^^) Stephen Whitaker^^) Illinois State Geological Survey Champaign, Illinois OPEN FILE SERIES 1989-3 (-'-) Illinois State Geological Survey (2) Illinois State Water Survey (^) Illinois Natural History Survey PART ONE OVERVIEW - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . ABSTRACT Brine waters, characterized by high concentrations of dissolved minerals, can be found at depth throughout the oil producing region of Illinois. Because petroleum traps commonly contain both brines and petroleum, both liquids are commonly pumped to the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA/600/R-06/104 September, 2006
    LEV EL III AND IV EC OR EGIONS OF ILLIN OIS by Alan J. Woods1 James M. Omernik2 Charles L. Pederson3 Brian C. Moran4 EPA/600/R-06/104 September, 2006 1Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory 200 SW 35th Street Corvallis, Oregon 97333 2U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory 200 SW 35th Street Corvallis, Oregon 97333 3Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Illinois University Charleston, Illinois 61920 4Indus Corporation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory 200 SW 35th Street Corvallis, Oregon 97333 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................3 PRIMARY SOURCES FOR ILLINOIS ECOREGION INFORMATION ....................................................................4 REGIONAL DESCRIPTIONS .................................................................................................................................... 5-17 52. DRIFTLESS AREA ........................................................................................................................................5 52a. Savanna Section.................................................................................................................................6 52b. Paleozoic
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Oil Field Brine Disposal Assessment
    WIS EA UBF 3 7600 0OO20 2047 Illinois Oil Field Brine Disposal Assessment ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING Staff Report LA* /.•:•<.<?.v 8 EMVIRO ; ' iTALfRHTECTION AGENCY STAlybr ILLINOIS SPRfNj&FflELDJLLJNOiS V P ILLINOIS OIL FIELD BRINE DISPOSAL ASSESSMENT STAFF REPORT ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 208 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING PROGRAM ^ - PLANNING AND STANDARDS SECTION ->* DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL m , 2200 CHURCHILL ROAD * " SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 62706 NOVEMBER, 1978 P •; r-'^m^^Y EI\Vll?ON(.r£hTALPROiECTiON.AGENCY STATE Or ILLINOIS -i SPRINGFIELDfILLlNOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES 111 LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF PLATES .. v LIST OF APPENDICES vi Chapter FOREWORD vii INTRODUCTION 1 Initial Inquiries and Study Objectives 1 Origin of Oil Field Brine. .| 3 Oil Production ,. , 6 Fluid Injection 6 Brine Pollution 11 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 21 Criteria 21 Location and Study of Sites 22 Investigative Procedures 23 Field Conditions 34 Evaporation/Seepage Pits 34 Injection Operations 40 Abandoned Wells 44 PRELIMINARY FINDINGS 46 PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS 48 GLOSSARY 49 REFERENCES 51 APPENDICES 53 n LIST OF TABLES Table Page I. Comparison of Sea Water and Oil Field Brine 4 II. IPCB Water Quality Standards 11 III. Average Concentrations of the Major Chemical Constituents From Each Piezometer and Pit 31 m LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Geologic Structure of the Illinois Basin ... 5 2. Oil Production in Illinois 7 3. Isocon Map of Ste. Genevieve Brines & 4. Generalized Movement of Water in the Vicinity of Holding Ponds 13 5. Location Map of Study Sites. 24 6. Generalized Location of Hagarstown Member of the Glasford Formation ..
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Wabash Regional Planning and Development
    2011 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Greater Wabash Region Greater Wabash Regional Planning Commission Accepted by the District CEDS Committee: February 23, 2011 Approved by the Economic Development Administration: Approved by the Board of Directors: 1 | Page Greater Wabash Regional Planning Commission 10 West Main St., P.O. Box 209 Albion, IL 62806 Serving Crawford, Edwards, Lawrence, Richland, Wabash, Wayne, and White Counties Sarah A. Mann Executive Director March 31, 2011 Mr. C. Robert Sawyer, Regional Director Economic Development Administration 111 North Canal Street Suite 855 Chicago, IL 60606-7208 Dear Mr. Sawyer: Pursuant to the requirements of the EDA 301 (b) planning grant received by Greater Wabash Regional Planning Commission, we are pleased to present the attached 2011 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS): Greater Wabash Region. Following approval by the EDA Chicago Regional Office, the District CEDS will be sent to all pertinent individuals within the District. The District CEDS document represents a complete update of the former CEDS published in 2009. This document incorporates all the new regulations established in 2006 by the Economic Development Administration’s Final Rule. Respectfully Submitted, Sarah A. Mann Sarah A. Mann Executive Director Phone: (618) 445-3612 Fax: (618) 445-3629 www.gwrpc.com 2 | Page 2011 CEDS Acknowledgements The Greater Wabash Regional Planning Commission (GWRPC) would like to express its grateful appreciation to the following organizations and local governments for
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Chlorophyll-Aas a Criterion for Establishing Nutrient
    TECHNICAL REPORTS: SURFACE WATER QUALITY Assessment of Chlorophyll-a as a Criterion for Establishing Nutrient Standards in the Streams and Rivers of Illinois Todd V. Royer* Indiana University Mark B. David, Lowell E. Gentry, Corey A. Mitchell, and Karen M. Starks University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Thomas Heatherly II and Matt R. Whiles Southern Illinois University Nutrient enrichment is a frequently cited cause for biotic he Federal Clean Water Act requires states to identify impairment of streams and rivers in the USA. Eff orts are Timpaired water bodies and develop plans to reduce underway to develop nutrient standards in many states, but impairment. Nutrient enrichment, mainly with nitrogen (N) defensible nutrient standards require an empirical relationship between nitrogen (N) or phosphorus (P) concentrations and and phosphorus (P), is a frequently cited cause of impairment for some criterion that relates nutrient levels to the attainment streams and rivers (USEPA, 2000a). Nutrient loading can degrade of designated uses. Algal biomass, measured as chlorophyll-a the ecological integrity of streams and create human health (chl-a), is a commonly proposed criterion, yet nutrient–chl-a concerns. For example, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency relationships have not been well documented in Illinois at a (USEPA) has set a drinking water standard of 10 mg NO –N L−1 state-wide scale. We used state-wide surveys of >100 stream 3 and river sites to assess the applicability of chl-a as a criterion to prevent methemoglobenemia. No drinking water standard for establishing nutrient standards for Illinois. Among all sites, exists for P; however, P enrichment can aff ect drinking water the median total P and total N concentrations were 0.185 and supplies by stimulating blooms of toxin-producing organisms, 5.6 mg L−1, respectively, during high-discharge conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH DAKOTA GAME and FISH DEPARTMENT Final Report Status of Selected Fishes with Immediate Conservation Need in North Dakota Pr
    NORTH DAKOTA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Final Report Status of Selected Fishes with Immediate Conservation Need in North Dakota Project T-14-R July 1, 2006 – December 31, 2008 Terry Steinwand Director Submitted by Michael G. McKenna Chief, Conservation and Communications Division Bismarck, ND June 2009 STATE WILDLIFE GRANT OBJECTIVES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS SUMMARY State Agency: North Dakota Game and Fish Department Study/Grant Number: T-14-R Status of selected fishes with immediate conservation need in North Title: Dakota Period Begin/End Dates: July 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008 Principle Investigator & Dr. Charles Berry Organization: South Dakota State University Project Summary: The goals of this report are to synthesize our study of fishes of the Red River Basin with emphasis on 17 rare species, and provide distribution maps for these species. During the summers of 2006 and 2007, we conducted 137 different sampling occasions at 125 different locations on 40 different streams. We deployed sampling gear a total of 185 times. Eight species of concern (chestnut lamprey, hornyhead chub, largescale stoneroller, northern redbelly dace, pearl dace, silver chub, trout-perch, and yellow bullhead) were collected in the Red River drainage. We did not find silver lamprey, blacknose shiner, blackchin shiner, carmine shiner, finescale dace, logperch, and pugnose shiner, which were historically collected in Red River tributaries. Hornyhead chub was collected at the most sites and was the most abundant, followed by trout-perch. Hornyhead chub was found in the Forest and Park rivers whereas trout-perch was collected in five watersheds. We determined that the species of stoneroller present in the Red River basin is the largescale stoneroller, Campostoma oligolepis.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan 2002
    Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan 2002 Comprehensive Conservation Plan INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND This Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) has been prepared for Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge). The CCP is a management tool to be used by the Refuge staff. It will help guide management decisions over the next 15 years, and set forth strategies for achieving Refuge goals and objectives within that timeframe. Overriding considerations reflected in the plan are that fish and wildlife conservation requires first priority in refuge management, and that wildlife-dependent recreation is allowed and encouraged as long as it is compatible with, or does not detract from, the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System or purposes of the Refuge. This chapter discusses the following topics: a brief description of the Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge and how it came into existence; the purpose of and need for the plan; the purpose and vision of the Refuge; the National Wildlife Refuge System mission, goals and guiding principles, including the legal context which guides management; and other relevant plans and partnerships that affect Refuge management. This plan details program planning levels that are above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. This plan does not constitute a secure commitment for staffing increases, or funding for future refuge-specific land acquisitions, construction projects or operational and maintenance increases. Refuge Overview: History of Refuge Establishment, Acquisition, and Management The Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge was established in 1990 under authority of the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, and was the first Refuge in West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Communities and Contaminants in Fish from Streams of the Red River of the North Basin, Minnesota and North Dakota by R.M
    Aquatic Communities and Contaminants in Fish from Streams of the Red River of the North Basin, Minnesota and North Dakota By R.M. Goldstein________________________________ U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4047 Contribution from the National Water Quality Assessment Program Mounds View, Minnesota 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center District Chief Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, MS 517 2280 Woodale Drive Denver Federal Center Mounds View, MN 55112 Denver, CO 80225 Information regarding the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program is available on the Internet via the World Wide Web. You may connect to the NAWQA Home Page using the Universal Resource Locator (URL) at: <URL:http://wwwrvares.er.usgs.gov/nawqa/nawqa_home.html> FOREWORD Describe current water-quality conditions for a large part of the Nation's freshwater streams, rivers, and aquifers. Describe how water quality is changing over The mission of the U.S. Geological Survey time. (USGS) is to assess the quantity and quality of the Improve understanding of the primary natural earth resources of the Nation and to provide and human factors that affect water-quality information that will assist resource managers and conditions. policymakers at Federal, State, and local levels in This information will help support the making sound decisions. Assessment of water- development and evaluation of management, quality conditions and trends is an important part regulatory, and monitoring decisions by other of this overall mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Flood Response of the Red River of the North Basin, North Dakota-Minnesota
    Changes in Flood Response of the Red River of the North Basin, North Dakota-Minnesota United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2243 Prepared in cooperation with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Commission Souris- Red-Rainy Regional Committee and the North Dakota State Water Commission Changes in Flood Response of the Red River of the North Basin, North Dakota-Minnesota By JEFFREY E. MILLER and DALE L. FRINK Prepared in cooperation with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Commission Souris- Red-Rainy Regional Committee and the North Dakota State Water Commission U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2243 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1984 For sale by Distribution Branch Text Products Section U.S. Geological Survey 604 South Pickett Street Alexandria, Virginia 22304 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Miller, Jeffrey E. Changes in flood response of the Red River of the North Basin, North Dakota-Minnesota. (Water-supply paper; 2243) "Prepared in cooperation with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Commission, Souris-Red-Rainy Regional Committee, and the North Dakota State Water Commission." Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.12:2243 1. Floods Red River of the North Watershed. 2. Floods- Minnesota. 3. Floods North Dakota. I. Frink, Dale L. II. Upper Mississippi River Basin Commission. III. United States. Souris-Red-Rainy River Basins Commission. IV. North Dakota State Water Commission. V. Title.
    [Show full text]