THE REGENT GRADUATE CATALOG Fall 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE REGENT GRADUATE CATALOG Fall 2021 THE REGENT GRADUATE CATALOG Fall 2021 Regent University 1000 Regent University Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23464-9800 800.373.5504 [email protected] www.regent.edu Regent University Page i PREFACE Regional Accreditation Regent University is accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges to award associates, baccalaureate, masters, and doctorate degrees. Contact the Commission on Colleges at 1866 Southern Lane, Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097 or call 404-679-4500 for questions about the accreditation of Regent University. National and State Accreditation Regent University (its undergraduate school and graduate schools) is accredited or certified by the following bodies: • The American Bar Association (ABA) The School of Law is fully approved by the American Bar Association. Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admission to the Bar of the American Bar Association, 321 N. Clark, 21st Floor, Chicago, IL 60654. Phone: (312) 988-6738. Website: www.abanet.org. • The American Psychological Association (APA) The Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology is accredited by the Commission on Accreditation (CoA) of the American Psychological Association (APA): Phone: (202) 336-5979. Website: http://www.apa.org/ed/accreditation/, Mailing Address: Office of Program Consultation and Accreditation, 750 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002- 4242. • The Association of Theological Schools in the United States and Canada (ATS) The Regent University School of Divinity is accredited by the Commission on Accrediting of the Association of Theological Schools in the United States and Canada, and the following degree programs are approved: M.A. in Spiritual Formation, M.A. in Practical Theology, MTS, M.Div., Th.M., D.Min., Ph.D. Approved for a Comprehensive Distance Education Program. The Commission contact information is: The Commission on Accrediting of the Association of Theological Schools in the United States and Canada 10 Summit Park Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15275 Telephone: 412-788-6505 Fax: 412-788-6510 Website: www.ats.edu • The Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) The Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP), a specialized accrediting body recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA), has accredited the following programs in the School Psychology & Counseling: Master of Arts in Clinical Mental Health Counseling, Master of Arts in School Counseling, Master of Arts in Marriage, Couple & Family Counseling, and Ph.D. in Counselor Education & Supervision. • Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) (www.chea.org/) • Commission of the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) The School of Education’s educational leadership and teacher preparation programs and the College of Arts and Science’s interdisciplinary studies program are awarded TEAC accreditation by the Inquiry Brief Commission of the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) for a Regent University Page ii period of seven years, to 12/31/2023. The accreditation does not include individual education courses that these programs offer to P-12 educators for professional development, re-licensure, or other purposes. For more information on this accreditation, visit caepnet.org Regent University is authorized to operate in the state of Virginia and is exempt from the requirements of certification provided by the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV) www.schev.edu. Equal Opportunity Policy for Students Regent University does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, national or ethnic origin, disability or veteran status in admissions, or in the administration of educational policies, scholarships, loan programs, athletics or other University administered student programs. In addition, Regent does not discriminate based on religion, except as necessary to comply with Regent’s Standard of Personal Conduct and Statement of Christian Community and Mission. Regent University has attempted to provide information, which at the time of publication, most accurately described the policies, procedures, regulations, and requirements of the University. The University reserves the right to alter or change any statement contained herein—i.e., necessary modifications in classes, fees, personnel lists, academic policies, and programs at any time and without prior notice. This Catalog is thus a guide and does not establish contractual relationships. Regent University Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .............................................................................................................................................................. ii Accreditation ...................................................................................................................................................... ii Equal Opportunity Policy for Students ........................................................................................................ iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ iv THE UNIVERSITY ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Message from Our Chancellor & CEO ................................................................................................... 7 Mission Statement ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Philosophy of Education ............................................................................................................................. 8 History of the University .............................................................................................................................. 8 Standard of Personal Conduct.................................................................................................................... 9 Campus Facilities........................................................................................................................................... 9 The University Library ............................................................................................................................... 10 Library Faculty ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Student Life, Campus Services and Academic Support .................................................................. 11 Student Services ..................................................................................................................................... 11 The University Writing Lab .................................................................................................................. 14 Information Technology ..................................................................................................................... 15 Psychological Services Center .............................................................................................................. 16 Commencement ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Graduate Academic Information and Policies .................................................................................... 17 Freedom of Expression ........................................................................................................................ 17 Student Records Confidentiality .......................................................................................................... 17 Access to Student Educational Records by Others .......................................................................... 17 Graduate Academic Programs (Degrees, etc.) .................................................................................. 18 Graduate Full-time Classification ........................................................................................................ 22 Academic Advising ................................................................................................................................ 22 Repeating a Course ................................................................................................................................ 22 Grading Systems .................................................................................................................................... 23 Appeals and Grievances ........................................................................................................................ 25 Academic Integrity ................................................................................................................................. 25 Academic Probation and Dismissal .................................................................................................... 25 Petitioning for Reinstatement .............................................................................................................. 26 Graduation Requirements .................................................................................................................... 26 Graduation Procedure ..........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Why Offering Honors Wings Works at Oral Roberts University Ashley Sweeney Oral Roberts University
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Chapters from NCHC Monographs Series National Collegiate Honors Council 2015 Winging It: Why Offering Honors Wings Works at Oral Roberts University Ashley Sweeney Oral Roberts University Hannah Covington Oral Roberts University John Korstad Oral Roberts University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcmonochap Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Higher Education Commons, Higher Education Administration Commons, Liberal Studies Commons, and the Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons Sweeney, Ashley; Covington, Hannah; and Korstad, John, "Winging It: Why Offering Honors Wings Works at Oral Roberts University" (2015). Chapters from NCHC Monographs Series. 25. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcmonochap/25 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the National Collegiate Honors Council at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chapters from NCHC Monographs Series by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. chapter 17 Winging It: Why Offering Honors Wings Works at Oral Roberts University Ashley Sweeney, Hannah Covington, and John Korstad Oral Roberts University* erhaps the first feature visitors notice about the campus of POral Roberts University (ORU) is the drama and bravado of its futuristic architecture. With symbolic, gold-plated buildings and a Prayer Tower positioned at the campus’ center, ORU’s structural design certainly stands as a testament to the Jetsons-esque flavor of its 1960s and 1970s origin. ORU is a private Christian univer- sity located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. For many parents, one of the main draws of the school remains its strict policy against co-ed housing.
    [Show full text]
  • NSSE 2019 Selected Comparison Groups Regent University
    NSSE 2019 Selected Comparison Groups Regent University IPEDS: 231651 NSSE 2019 Selected Comparison Groups About This Report Comparison Groups The NSSE Institutional Report displays core survey results for your students alongside those of three comparison groups. In May, your institution was invited to customize these groups via a form on the Institution Interface. This report summarizes how your comparison groups were constructed and lists the institutions within them. NSSE comparison groups may be customized by (a) identifying specific institutions from the list of all 2018 and 2019 NSSE participants, (b) composing the group by selecting institutional characteristics, or (c) a combination of these. Institutions that chose not to customize received default groupsa that provide relevant comparisons for most institutions. Institutions that appended additional question sets in the form of Topical Modules or through consortium participation were also invited to customize comparison groups for those reports. The default for those groups was all other 2018 and 2019 institutions where the questions were administered. Please note: Comparison group details for Topical Module and consortium reports are documented separately in those reports. Your Students' Comparison Comparison Comparison Report Comparisons Responses Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Comparison groups are located in the institutional reports as illustrated in the mock report at right. In this example, the three groups are "Admissions Overlap," "Carnegie UG Program," and "NSSE Cohort." Reading This Report This report consists of Comparison Group Name three sections that The name assigned to the provide details for each comparison group is listed here. of your comparison groups, illustrated at How Group was Constructed Indicates whether your group was right.
    [Show full text]
  • His Royal Highness the Prince Regent of Belgium, the President of The
    The Brussels Treaty Five European Nations Brussels, Belgium March 17, 1948 His Royal Highness the Prince Regent of Belgium, the President of the French Republic, President of the French Union, Her Royal Highness the Grand Duchess of Luxembourg, Her Majesty the Queen of the Netherlands and His Majesty The King of Great Britain, Ireland and the British Dominions beyond the Seas, Resolved To reaffirm their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the other ideals proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations; To fortify and preserve the principles of democracy, personal freedom and political liberty, the constitutional traditions and the rule of law, which are their common heritage; To strengthen, with these aims in view, the economic, social and cultural ties by which they are already united; To co-operate loyally and to co-ordinate their efforts to create in Western Europe a firm basis for European economic recovery; To afford assistance to each other, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, in maintaining international peace and security and in resisting any policy of aggression; To take such steps as may be held to be necessary in the event of a renewal by Germany of a policy of aggression; To associate progressively in the pursuance of these aims other States inspired by the same ideals and animated by the like determination; Desiring for these purposes to conclude a treaty for collaboration in economic, social and cultural matters and for collective self-defence; Have appointed as their Plenipotentiaries: who, having exhibited their full powers found in good and due form, have agreed as follows: ARTICLE I Convinced of the close community of their interests and of the necessity of uniting in order to promote the economic recovery of Europe, the High Contracting Parties will so organize and coordinate their economic activities as to produce the best possible results, by the elimination of conflict in their economic policies, the co-ordination of production and the development of commercial exchanges.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark R. Shannon, Phd
    MARK R. SHANNON, PHD EDUCATION PhD Regent University, Organizational Leadership August 2018 Dissertation: “The Transformational Effect of Trigger Events and Leadership Crucibles in the Lives of Authentic Leaders Development” Committee: Dr. Bruce Winston (chair), Dr. Maurice Buford, Dr. Andy Wood MBA Oklahoma Wesleyan University, Managerial Finance, High Honors May 2013 Thesis: “Outsourcing at eBay” Advisor: Dr. Wendel Weaver BA Covenant College, Interdisciplinary Studies May 1986 HONORS AND AWARDS Faculty Member of the Year 2018, 2019 Selected by colleagues for exemplary professorial actions with faculty and students. Promising Teacher Award 2018 Selected by the student body for academic excellence and future promise. TEACHING EXPERIENCE Oklahoma Wesleyan University, Oklahoma July 2013 to Present Associate Professor, Chesapeake Energy School of Business • Instruct Management, Leadership, and Communication courses to both graduate and undergraduate students. Topic covered include, business management, human resource management, business ethics, influential leadership, organizational behavior, public speaking, negotiation strategy, and persuasion and motivation. Classes range from 100 to 10 students • Develop an engaging curriculum that includes quizzes, exams, presentations, and homeWork • Revised the syllabus to meet accreditation standards • Coordinated grading and labs with a team of four teaching assistants Liberty University, Virginia January 2019 to Present Adjunct Professor, School of Business • Organizational Behavior, a graduate
    [Show full text]
  • Personnel Per So
    Personnel per so nnel ( ) Date of Employment Barbara McMillin (1992) Associate Provost, Dean of Instruction and Professor of English. A.A., Northeast office of the President Mississippi Community College; B.A., Union University; administrative office M.A. and D.A., University of Mississippi. Additional David S. Dockery (1996) President and Professor of study, Harvard University. Christian Thought and Tradition. B.S., University of Cynthia Powell Jayne (1976) University Professor of Alabama at Birmingham; M.Div., Grace Theological Language, and Associate Provost for International and Seminary; M.Div., Southwestern Baptist Theological Intercultural Studies. B.A., Mississippi College; M.A. Seminary; M.A., Texas Christian University; Ph.D., and Ph.D., Louisiana State University; Additional study, University of Texas at Arlington; Additional study, Drew Vanderbilt University, University of Kentucky and The University. Summer Institute of Intercultural Communication. Cindy Meredith (1996) Executive Assistant to the President. Randall W. Phillips (2004) Director of Research and Melanie Rickman (1998) Executive Secretary to the Associate Professor of Family Studies. B.S., Union President. University; M.A., Phillips Graduate Institute; Ph.D., Southern Illinois University-Carbondale. spiritual life / Campus Ministries Gregory A. Thornbury (1999). Vice President for Spiritual Camille Searcy (1993) Assistant Director of Institutional Life, Dean of the School of Theology and Missions and Effectiveness and Research and Associate Professor of Associate Professor of Philosophy. B.A., Messiah College; Education. B.S., Lane College; M.Ed., University of M.Div. and Ph.D., Southern Baptist Theological Seminary; Memphis; Ph.D., Southern Illinois University. Additional study, Oxford University. Suzanne Barham (1987) Project Coordinator, Office of Christy Young (2006) Administrative Assistant to the the Provost.
    [Show full text]
  • Contraception and the Renaissance of Traditional Marriage
    CHOOSING A LAW TO LIVE BY ONCE THE KING IS GONE INTRODUCTION Law is the expression of the rules by which civilization governs itself, and it must be that in law as elsewhere will be found the fundamental differences of peoples. Here then it may be that we find the underlying cause of the difference between the civil law and the common law.1 By virtue of its origin, the American legal profession has always been influenced by sources of law outside the United States. American law schools teach students the common law, and law students come to understand that the common law is different than the civil law, which is prevalent in Europe.2 Comparative law courses expose law students to the civil law system by comparing American common law with the law of other countries such as France, which has a civil code.3 A closer look at the history of the American and French Revolutions makes one wonder why the legal systems of the two countries are so different. Certainly, the American and French Revolutions were drastically different in some ways. For instance, the French Revolution was notoriously violent during a period known as “the Terror.”4 Accounts of the French revolutionary government executing so many French citizens as well as the creation of the Cult of the Supreme Being5 make the French Revolution a stark contrast to the American Revolution. Despite the differences, the revolutionary French and Americans shared similar goals—liberty and equality for all citizens and an end to tyranny. Both revolutions happened within approximately two decades of each other and were heavily influenced by the Enlightenment.
    [Show full text]
  • College of Education Conceptual Framework
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATION UNIT CONCEPTUAL MODEL 1 COLLEGE OF EDUCATION CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK THEME: TRANSFORMED EDUCATORS …be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind… Romans12:2 VISION: TRANSFORMING SOCIETY THE MIRACLE AHEAD A TRANSFORMED GENERATION MISSION: PREPARING PROFESSIONAL CHRISTIAN EDUCATORS TO GO INTO EVERY PERSON’S WORLD To provide the opportunity for individuals who hold Christian principles to participate in initial and advanced study in preparation for professional, public and private responsibilities in the field of education throughout the world. PHILOSOPHY: BIBLICAL FOUNDATION – CHRISTIAN WORLDVIEW • Nature of the Learner – Created in God’s Image • Truth and Knowledge – All Truth is God’s Truth • Values – Biblically Based KNOWLEDGE BASE: • Centered on University Outcomes • Linked to Institutional Standards • Aligned with National Standards, State Competencies, and Standards of the Profession • Evaluated and assessed in light of current research and best practices • Built upon past achievements and universal truths ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK “Transformed Educators” The conceptual framework for the Oral Roberts University College of Education provides the structure for course content and standards, stated student competencies, instruction, assessment, and evaluation. The School of Education offers a diverse teacher preparation program designed to equip teacher candidates for initial assignments in elementary and secondary schools as well as advanced programs for school administration. The three segments – general education, specialized education, and professional education are offered to prepare graduates for professional responsibilities in public, private, and Christian schools. Unit Theme Transformed Educators Transforming Society The Miracle Ahead - A Transformed Generation Educating the Whole Person In keeping with the University’s Statement of Purpose, the College of Education is rooted in the philosophical position that education is the shaping of the whole person: spirit, mind, and body.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Academic Catalog P a G E | 1
    Virginia Wesleyan University 2020 - 2021 Academic Catalog P a g e | 1 Undergraduate Academic Catalog 2020 - 2021 Statement of Non-Discrimination Virginia Wesleyan University is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Applicants are considered on the basis of skills, experience, and qualifications without regard to race, religion, color, creed, gender, national and ethnic origin, age, marital status, covered veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, the presence of non-job-related medical disability, or any other legally protected status. Complaints relevant to Title IX are managed by the University’s Title IX Coordinator, Karla Rasmussen, 757.455.3316 or by emailing [email protected]. Complaints may also be reported directly to the Office for Civil Rights. This catalog is published by Virginia Wesleyan University and contains information concerning campus life, academic policies, program and course offerings, and career preparation. Students are expected to familiarize themselves with the academic policies contained in the catalog. Failure to do so does not excuse students from the requirements and regulations described herein. Disclaimer: The catalog is offered as a guide, not as a contract. It is not intended to and does not contain all policies and regulations that relate to students. The University reserves the right to make alterations in programs, course offerings, policies, and fees without prior notice. For the Online Degree Completion and Graduate Programs Catalog, please visit: vwu.edu/gradonline Virginia Wesleyan
    [Show full text]
  • NSSE 2018 Selected Comparison Groups Regent University
    NSSE 2018 Selected Comparison Groups Regent University IPEDS: 231651 NSSE 2018 Selected Comparison Groups About This Report Comparison Groups The NSSE Institutional Report displays core survey results for your students alongside those of three comparison groups. In May, your institution was invited to customize these groups via a form on the Institution Interface. This report summarizes how your comparison groups were constructed and lists the institutions within them. NSSE comparison groups may be customized by (a) identifying specific institutions from the list of all 2017 and 2018 NSSE participants, (b) composing the group by selecting institutional characteristics, or (c) a combination of these. Institutions that chose not to customize received default groupsa that provide relevant comparisons for most institutions. Institutions that appended additional question sets in the form of Topical Modules or through consortium participation were also invited to customize comparison groups for those reports. The default for those groups was all other 2017 and 2018 institutions where the questions were administered. Please note: Comparison group details for Topical Module and consortium reports are documented separately in those reports. Your Students' Comparison Comparison Comparison Report Comparisons Responses Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Comparison groups are located in the institutional reports as illustrated in the mock report at right. In this example, the three groups are "Admissions Overlap," "Carnegie UG Program," and "NSSE 2017 & 2018." Reading This Report This report consists of Comparison Group Name three sections that The name assigned to the provide details for each comparison group is listed here. of your comparison groups, illustrated at How Group was Constructed Indicates whether your group was right.
    [Show full text]
  • Belgium's Constitution of 1831
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:55 constituteproject.org Belgium's Constitution of 1831 Historical This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:55 Table of contents Preamble . 3 TITLE I: Territory and its Divisions . 3 TITLE II: Belgians and their Rights . 3 TITLE III: Powers . 6 CHAPTER FIRST: THE TWO HOUSES . 7 Section I: The House of Representatives . 8 Section II: The Senate . 9 CHAPTER II: THE KING AND HIS MINISTERS . 10 Section I: The King . 10 Section II: The Ministers . 14 CHAPTER III: JUDICIAL POWER . 15 CHAPTER IV: PROVINCIAL AND COMMUNAL INSTITUTIONS . 17 TITLE IV: Finances . 17 TITLE V: The Army . 19 TITLE VI: General Dispositions . 19 TITLE VII: Constitutional Revision . 20 TITLE VIII: General Disposition . 20 Supplementary Dispositions . 21 Belgium 1831 Page 2 constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:55 • Source of constitutional authority • Preamble Preamble In the name of the Belgian people, the National Congress decrees: TITLE I: Territory and its Divisions Article 1 Belgium is divided into provinces. These provinces are: Antwerp, Brabant, East Flanders, West Flanders, Hainaut, Liege, Limbourg, Luxembourg, Namur, except the relations of Luxembourg with the German Confederation. The territory may be divided by law into a greater number of provinces. Art 2 Subdivisions of the provinces can be established only by law. Art 3 • Accession of territory • Secession of territory The boundaries of the State, of the provinces and of the communes can only be changed or rectified by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Fact Book 2020-2021
    Annual Fact Book 2020-2021 Dr. Amanda J. Wynn Director of Institutional Research 1000 Regent University Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23464 http://www.regent.edu/ir ________________________________________________________CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP TO CHANGE THE WORLD _________ About the Institution Governor, Louisiana State Senator, National Middle School Principal of the Year, Hollywood screenwriters, National Milken Educator Regent University is the nation's academic center for Christian thought Award Winner and Assistant Secretary of Labor. and action, with a multitude of on-campus and online programs available worldwide. Our academic standards for both our graduate History and Location and undergraduate programs are high and our programs rigorous. But what sets Regent apart is our mission to prepare capable men and The university was founded for the specific purpose of preparing women to excel both in mind and spirit. Our students, faculty and leaders who would not only succeed in their professions, but also administrators share a calling, founded on biblical principles, to make advance as Christians equipped to effectively impact their world. In a significant difference in our communities, our cities, our nation and 1977, CBN University was incorporated as a nonprofit educational our world. institution in Virginia Beach, Virginia. In the fall of 1978, 77 students began classes in modest, rented facilities. By October 1989, CBN Leadership and Influence University had grown from a School of Communication and the Arts to seven professional schools with nearly 800 students. On January 1, When Dr. M.G. “Pat” Robertson established the university in 1978, he 1990, in recognition of this growth, the Board of Trustees voted to envisioned a high-caliber institution that would attract a leadership change the name of CBN University to Regent University.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Monarchist News Les Nouvelles Monarchiques Du Canada Winter/Hiver 2017 — No
    Canadian Monarchist News Les Nouvelles Monarchiques du Canada Winter/Hiver 2017 — No. 39 An occasional Newsletter for members and friends of The Monarchist League of Canada The Monarchist League of Canada / La Ligue Monarchiste du Canada, PO Box 1057, Lakeshore West PO, Oakville, Ontario, Canada L6K 0B2 905-855-7262 (800) 465-6925 www.monarchist.ca THE MONARCHIST LEAGUE OF CANADA – 47th ANNIVERSARY 1970-2017 FEDS AND CROWN: WHITHER THE CANADIAN SECRETARY TO THE QUEEN? WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON VICE -REGAL APPOINTMENTS? Report and Analysis has not organized in recent decades. by Robert Finch, Dominion It is clearly understood in Ottawa Chairman, the Monarchist that no successor is to be appointed. League of Canada True, MacLeod had had at times A week after CMN sent two ques - a rocky relationship with PMO and tions to a media spokesman in the PCO officials even before the elec - Department of Canadian Heritage, tion of the Trudeau government. on matters of interest and concern Within days of its coming to power, to Canadian monarchists, February the position of Canadian Secretary 17th brought replies that can be best was moved from its prime real estate characterized as unhelpful – in fact, – physical and metaphorical – to the the second was utterly non-respon - Ministry of Canadian Heritage in sive with a mysterious reference to Gatineau, where MacLeod – before unspecified “more general an - his appointments as Senate Black nouncements” – from the Depart - Rod and subsequently Canadian Sec - the Harper government showed its The Governor General & ment’s Media Relations Services. retary to The Queen – had laboured regard for the significant role of the Mrs Johnston welcomed to The questions and replies were loyally and with perseverance for Crown within Canadian democratic Monarchist League celebration as follows: many years in a hornet’s nest of re - institutions was to create the Cana - of Queen’s 90th birthday by Q: Why is there to be no successor publicans.
    [Show full text]