DOCSLIB.ORG

Papers from the National Statistician's Crime Statistics Advisory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Papers from the National Statistician's Crime Statistics Advisory NATIONAL STATISTICIAN’S CRIME STATISTICS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA UK Statistics Authority, Meeting room 3, Drummond Gate, London, SW1V 2QQ Thursday 24 September 2015, 14:00 – 16:00 Attendees: Adrian Smith (Chair) UK Statistics Authority Board David Blunt Home Office Steve Bond Home Office Allan Brimicombe University of East London Roma Chappell Office for National Statistics Steve Ellerd-Elliott Ministry of Justice Jeff Farrar National Policing Lead for Crime Statistics Fiona Glen Independent expert Glyn Jones Welsh Government Chris Lewis University of Portsmouth Patricia Mayhew Independent Criminological Consultant Mark Cooper Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (for Tom Winsor) Mike Warren Home Office (for Diana Luchford) John Flatley (Secretariat) Office for National Statistics Apologies: Junaid Gharda Office of the Police & Crime Commissioner for Staffordshire Mike Levi Cardiff University Diana Luchford Home Office Stephen Shute University of Sussex Tom Winsor Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary Agenda Timings Order of Business Item No. 1. 14:00 – 14:10 Introduction and announcements Adrian Smith (Chair) 2. 14:10 – 14:15 NSCSAC(15)1 Minutes and matters arising from the meeting held on 20 May 2015 Adrian Smith (Chair) 3. 14:15 – 14:30 For NSCSAC(15)2 Draft terms of reference Discussion Adrian Smith (Chair) 4. 14:30 – 15:30 NSCSAC(15)3 Report on the UKSA event Author NSCSAC(15)4 Review of work programme and priorities for the Committee John Flatley (Secretariat) 5. 15:30 – 15:40 Crime Data Integrity – Oral update Mark Cooper, HMIC 6. 15:40 – 15:50 NSCSAC(15)5 National Crime Registrar’s Report Steve Bond, Home Office 7. 15:50 – 16:00 Any other All members business NSCSAC(15)6 MINUTES OF THE NATIONAL STATISTICIAN’S CRIME STATISTICS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING ON 24 SEPTEMBER 2015 Meeting room 3, 1 Drummond Gate, Pimlico, London, SW1V 2QQ CHAIR Adrian Smith UK Statistics Authority Board MEMBERS PRESENT David Blunt Home Office Steve Bond Home Office Allan Brimicombe University of East London Roma Chappell Office for National Statistics Steve Ellerd-Elliott Ministry of Justice Jeff Farrar National Policing Lead for Crime Statistics Fiona Glen Independent expert Glyn Jones Welsh Government Chris Lewis University of Portsmouth Patricia Mayhew Independent Criminological Consultant ADDITIONAL ATTENDEES Mark Cooper Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (for Tom Winsor) Mike Warren Home Office (for Diana Luchford) SECRETARIAT John Flatley Office for National Statistics APOLOGIES Junaid Gharda Office of the Police & Crime Commissioner for Staffordshire Mike Levi Cardiff University Diana Luchford Home Office Stephen Shute University of Sussex Tom Winsor Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary 1. Chair's Introduction and announcements 1.1. The Chair welcomed members to the first meeting of the re-constituted committee and explained that he wanted to use this first meeting to focus discussion on ways of working and to identify priorities for future work. The Chair suggested that he was minded to make more use of sub-groups to take a “deep dive” into specific issues to bring back to the committee. Such sub-groups could be extended to experts beyond the current membership if it was felt useful to do so. 1.2. The Chair informed members, that in the light of such discussion, he wanted to review membership and consider whether the committee had the right blend of expertise it needed. The Chair said that he would write to members in the coming weeks about membership and periods of appointment. 2. Minutes and matters arising from meeting held on 20 May 2015- NSCSAC(15)1 2.1. The minutes of the last meeting of the predecessor committee were agreed as an accurate record. 2.2. The Secretariat informed members that the outgoing Chair, Stephen Shute, expected to circulate a draft final report to members for comment within the next few weeks. Once agreed, it would be sent to the Home Secretary and the National Statistician. 2.3. The Chair noted that the actions from the last meeting, as summarized in the Action Log at the end of the minutes, had been completed or were to be covered by agenda items at this meeting. 2.4. The Chair then invited Chris Lewis to report back on the first meeting of a Task and Finish Group (TFG) that had been created to take forward work on a Crime Index. 2.5. It was reported that the first meeting had been held in the morning before the full committee meeting and reviewed a paper presented by ONS on work that they had undertaken to date. Chris Lewis said that he thought it likely that the group would take 9-12 months to complete its work. 2.6. There was a discussion about the extent to which the full NSCSAC committee should be engaged in the work of the TFG and it was agreed there should be an ongoing dialogue with brief updates given at each main committee meeting. The Chair thought there would be useful lessons to share from the review of and debate on Prices Indices in the development of this work. Action 1: Secretariat to add update from the Crime Index TFG to the agenda for future meetings. 3. Draft terms of reference - NSCSAC(15)2 3.1. The Chair introduced the draft terms of reference and invited comments from members. There was a question about the extent to which the new terms of reference differed from the previous set. It was explained that the most significant change concerned the change in governance and that the committee’s advice was to go to the National Statistician, who would then advise the Home Secretary and HMIC in his role as Government's principal adviser on official statistics. 3.2. The Chair also drew attention to the additional reference to the Regulatory work of the UK Statistics Authority and that he thought it helpful for the committee to hear, from time to time, from the Director General for Regulation when there were issues that raised matters for this committee. 3.3. It was noted that paragraph 3 referred to the scope of the committee’s consideration being extended to include the Home Office’s Commercial Victimisation Survey (CVS). Some members questioned the need for this extension, pointing out that the CVS already had a separate set of governance arrangements including a Steering Group and an External Reference Group. There was agreement that NSCSAC should not seek to duplicate activity carried out elsewhere but that crime against business was an important part of the crime statistics landscape and should not be beyond the scope of the committee’s advice if it was needed in the future. 3.4. This led to further discussion about whether or not the views of NSCSAC needed to be sought before any changes or improvements were made to the official statistics on crime. It was agreed that it was never the intention for the committee to consider every small change and that only matters of significance with regard to the primary mission for the committee (as set out in para 1 of the terms of reference) needed to come before the committee for advice. 3.5. It was agreed that the terms of reference needed some tweaking to reflect the above discussion. Action 2: Secretariat to amend draft terms of reference and to circulate with the minutes for comment. 4. Report on the UK Statistics Authority event on crime statistics – NSCSAC(15)3 4.1. John Flatley (ONS) introduced a paper that had been jointly written with Ed Humpherson, UK Statistics Authority Director General of Regulation which reflected on the Authority event on crime statistics under the banner of the new strategy of Better Statistics, Better Decisions. The paper summarized the key themes that came out of the event and invited the committee to reflect on them and consider which were key priorities for advice by the committee going forward. 4.2. The Chair invited the committee to consider the issues identified in Ed Humpherson’s address to the event which sought to set out some of the key questions about the value of crime statistics, such as: • Who are crime statistics for? • What judgements do they inform? • Do they cover the right types of crime? • Do they capture experiences of all victims? • Is enough done to link them to other types of criminal justice data, and to other non justice data sets, including commercial datasets? • What sort of accountability do they support? 4.3. The Chair invited members to consider whether these were the right questions. In discussion, the additional points were identified: • Is the burden imposed in collecting or producing the statistics commensurate with the value in publishing them? • How does the quality of the statistics benchmark against international standards? • How well are the statistics communicated and presented to the diverse range of users who might make use of them? • What are the major gaps in our understanding of crime and what new forms of databases might be used to better inform the totality of crime/demand on the police? 4.4. The committee then reviewed the themes and proposed actions set out in Annex A of the paper. The proposed actions were agreed and there was discussion on a range of work that was already under various themes. The Chair suggested that an issues log should be created to provide an up to date information record of the latest developments on topics being considered by the committee. Action 3: Secretariat to establish an issues log to be updated for each committee meeting. 5. Crime Data Integrity - Oral update from HMIC 5.1. At this point in the meeting, the Chair invited Mark Cooper to give an update ion HMIC’s latest thinking about their future inspection of police recorded crime data.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Royal Statistical Scandal
    Royal Statistical Scandal False and misleading claims by the Royal Statistical Society Including on human poverty and UN global goals Documentary evidence Matt Berkley Draft 27 June 2019 1 "The Code also requires us to be competent. ... We must also know our limits and not go beyond what we know.... John Pullinger RSS President" https://www.statslife.org.uk/news/3338-rss-publishes-revised-code-of- conduct "If the Royal Statistical Society cannot provide reasonable evidence on inflation faced by poor people, changing needs, assets or debts from 2008 to 2018, I propose that it retract the honour and that the President makes a statement while he holds office." Matt Berkley 27 Dec 2018 2 "a recent World Bank study showed that nearly half of low-and middle- income countries had insufficient data to monitor poverty rates (2002- 2011)." Royal Statistical Society news item 2015 1 "Max Roser from Oxford points out that newspapers could have legitimately run the headline ' Number of people in extreme poverty fell by 137,000 since yesterday' every single day for the past 25 years... Careless statistical reporting could cost lives." President of the Royal Statistical Society Lecture to the Independent Press Standards Organisation April 2018 2 1 https://www.statslife.org.uk/news/2495-global-partnership-for- sustainable-development-data-launches-at-un-summit 2 https://www.statslife.org.uk/features/3790-risk-statistics-and-the-media 3 "Mistaken or malicious misinformation can change your world... When the government is wrong about you it will hurt you too but you may never know how.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the ADRN Governing Board, David Hand
    The Role of the ADRN Governing Board Professor David Hand Chair of the Administrative Data Research Network Board 1 Responses to the ADTF recommendation to establish a UK Governing Board to provide the governance structure for the ADRCs Government Response (14 June 2013) “The Government supports the principle of the Governing Board reporting to Parliament via an independent body ... we agree that the UK Statistics Authority could be well placed to provide appropriate oversight.” UK Statistics Authority Response (12 November 2013) “… the Board of the Statistics Authority discussed the extent of progress in establishing the Administrative Data Research Network and … formally agreed to proposals for the Authority’s governance role in relation to the ADRN ...” 2 Key functions of the Governing Board: R1.8: Strategy • Leadership • Guidance on ethical standards, international experience, methodology, security, legal aspects, etc • Enablement • Project approvals panel includes a Board member • Encourage collaboration across the ADRCs R1.9: Accountability • Report annually to UKSA on • Performance of the ADRN • Governance of the ADRN 3 Further recommendations: R1.10 “An important part of the work of the ADRCs will be to” • Monitor legality, viability, and technical feasibility of proposals • Ensure research skills • The ADS acting as a portal to the network (the “Information Gateway”) R1.11 • “At an early stage, [the Board should] investigate guidelines for access and linkage by private sector interests, as well as commissioning public engagement
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the 31 Meeting of the GSS Methodology Advisory Committee
    Minutes of the 31st Meeting of the GSS Methodology Advisory Committee 24th May 2016 Drummond Gate, London Hosted by the Office for National Statistics 1 GSS MAC 31 Minutes Contents 1.0 List of Attendees .......................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Administration .............................................................................................................. 5 2.1 ONS and GSS news ................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Methodology news ................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Minutes and progress from GSS MAC 30 ................................................................ 5 3.0 Papers presented ........................................................................................................ 6 3.1 Paper 1: Developing an approach to addressing potential discontinuities in the new National Survey for Wales .............................................................................................. 6 3.2 Paper 2: 2021 Census Coverage Adjustment Methodology ..................................... 9 4.0 Project updates.......................................................................................................... 12 4.1 Plans for use of administrative data ....................................................................... 12 4.2 Update on Big Data and Classifying web scraped data using machine learning ....
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics Making an Impact
    John Pullinger J. R. Statist. Soc. A (2013) 176, Part 4, pp. 819–839 Statistics making an impact John Pullinger House of Commons Library, London, UK [The address of the President, delivered to The Royal Statistical Society on Wednesday, June 26th, 2013] Summary. Statistics provides a special kind of understanding that enables well-informed deci- sions. As citizens and consumers we are faced with an array of choices. Statistics can help us to choose well. Our statistical brains need to be nurtured: we can all learn and practise some simple rules of statistical thinking. To understand how statistics can play a bigger part in our lives today we can draw inspiration from the founders of the Royal Statistical Society. Although in today’s world the information landscape is confused, there is an opportunity for statistics that is there to be seized.This calls for us to celebrate the discipline of statistics, to show confidence in our profession, to use statistics in the public interest and to champion statistical education. The Royal Statistical Society has a vital role to play. Keywords: Chartered Statistician; Citizenship; Economic growth; Evidence; ‘getstats’; Justice; Open data; Public good; The state; Wise choices 1. Introduction Dictionaries trace the source of the word statistics from the Latin ‘status’, the state, to the Italian ‘statista’, one skilled in statecraft, and on to the German ‘Statistik’, the science dealing with data about the condition of a state or community. The Oxford English Dictionary brings ‘statistics’ into English in 1787. Florence Nightingale held that ‘the thoughts and purpose of the Deity are only to be discovered by the statistical study of natural phenomena:::the application of the results of such study [is] the religious duty of man’ (Pearson, 1924).
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 557 21 January 2013 No. 100 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 21 January 2013 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT HON.DAVID CAMERON,MP,MAY 2010) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt Hon. David Cameron, MP DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND LORD PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL—The Rt Hon. Nick Clegg, MP FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon. William Hague, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt Hon. George Osborne, MP CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE TREASURY—The Rt Hon. Danny Alexander, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt Hon. Theresa May, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE—The Rt Hon. Philip Hammond, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,INNOVATION AND SKILLS—The Rt Hon. Vince Cable, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS—The Rt Hon. Iain Duncan Smith, MP LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE—The Rt Hon. Chris Grayling, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION—The Rt Hon. Michael Gove, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT—The Rt Hon. Eric Pickles, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH—The Rt Hon. Jeremy Hunt, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon. Owen Paterson, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT—The Rt Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • ONS Board Minutes
    UK STATISTICS AUTHORITY ONS Board Draft Minutes Tuesday, 22 January 2013 Boardroom, Newport Present UK Statistics Authority Professor Sir Adrian Smith (Chair) Dame Moira Gibb Mr Guy Goodwin Mr Paul Layland Dr David Levy (via audio) Ms Jil Matheson Mrs Caron Walker Mr Glen Watson Other Attendees None Secretariat Mr Robert Bumpstead Ms Sarah Green Apologies None Declarations of Interest None 1. Apologies, Minutes and Matters Arising 1.1 The 51st meeting of the ONS Board was held in Newport on Tuesday 22 January 2013. No apologies were received. The minutes of the previous meeting on 18 December 2012 were agreed as a correct record. The Chair noted the recent bad weather at Newport and the Board expressed thanks to all staff for coping with the difficult conditions, including the members of the ELT who had met in Newport the Friday before the meeting. 1.2 Progress with actions was reviewed. It was agreed that in future written notes or updates against actions should be provided with the papers in advance of the meeting, rather than verbal updates being provided at the meeting itself, where this was possible. The following actions were reconfirmed and further agreed: Action: Provide a note about user engagement with development of the ONS website to the next meeting of the ONS Board. Consider this note alongside the planned demonstration of the website at the meeting. Action: Provide a note on the position with News Releases and attach the note to the minutes of the Board meeting for circulation. The note should reflect the context of the recent PASC evidence session and the steer that the National Statistician had given about News Releases at that session.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Confidentiality and UK Population Censuses: a Summary
    Statistical Confidentiality and UK Population Censuses: A Summary of Recent Findings and Ethical Issues William Seltzer Fordham University, Dept. of Sociology and Anthropology (Dealy 407), 441 East Fordham Road, Bronx, NY 10458 USA. E-mail: [email protected] Sessions STCPMs 1. Introduction The confidentiality of personal information provided to government statistical authorities during population censuses and similar statistical operations is a well-established principle, at least among statisticians. Accordingly, as discussed more fully in section 3 below, most sets of ethical norms in the field of statistics explicitly refer to the responsibility of maintaining statistical confidentiality on the grounds that such disclosures may lead to respondent harm. This ethical norm has been reflected, at least to some degree, in the confidentiality provisions of census and statistical laws adopted in most countries. These laws are of two broad types: first, those that prohibit disclosures for all types of non-statistical uses, and second, those that permit disclosures for certain important non-statistical state purposes. While those laws of the first type may permit some disclosures considered as harmless (for example, sharing data among statistical agencies to foster enhanced analytical possibilities) such strong statistical confidentiality laws adhere closely to the ethical principle that the personal information provided will not be used to harm or target individuals. Unfortunately, many other countries, whether by tradition or in response to perceived national threats, have adopted weaker census or other statistical confidentiality laws that allow for a distinction between authorized and unauthorized disclosures without reference to the issue of individual harm, and only bar the latter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Statistical Society Getstats Campaign Ten Years to Statistical Literacy? Neville Davies Royal Statistical Society Cent
    The Royal Statistical Society getstats Campaign Ten Years to Statistical Literacy? Neville Davies Royal Statistical Society Centre for Statistical Education University of Plymouth, UK www.rsscse.org.uk www.censusatschool.org.uk [email protected] twitter.com/CensusAtSchool RSS Centre for Statistical Education • What do we do? • Who are we? • How do we do it? • Where are we? What we do: promote improvement in statistical education For people of all ages – in primary and secondary schools, colleges, higher education and the workplace Cradle to grave statistical education! Dominic Mark John Neville Martignetti Treagust Marriott Paul Hewson Davies Kate Richards Lauren Adams Royal Statistical Society Centre for Statistical Education – who we are HowWhat do we we do: do it? Promote improvement in statistical education For people of all ages – in primary and secondary schools, colleges, higher education and theFunders workplace for the RSSCSE Cradle to grave statistical education! MTB support for RSSCSE How do we do it? Funders for the RSSCSE MTB support for RSSCSE How do we do it? Funders for the RSSCSE MTB support for RSSCSE How do we do it? Funders for the RSSCSE MTB support for RSSCSE How do we do it? Funders for the RSSCSE MTB support for RSSCSE How do we do it? Funders for the RSSCSE MTB support for RSSCSE Where are we? Plymouth Plymouth - on the border between Devon and Cornwall University of Plymouth University of Plymouth Local attractions for visitors to RSSCSE - Plymouth harbour area The Royal Statistical Society (RSS) 10-year
    [Show full text]
  • GSS Conference 2017 Speaker Biographies John Pullinger
    GSS Conference 2017 Speaker Biographies John Pullinger John Pullinger started as the National Statistician, Head of the Government Statistical Service (GSS) and Chief Executive of the UK Statistics Authority on 1 July 2014. He was previously Chair, and Vice- Chair, of the United Nations Statistical Commission (UNSC). In this capacity John was greatly involved in the development of measures for the Sustainable Development Goals. John's career began in 1980 when he joined the civil service after graduating in geography and statistics from Exeter University. After several statistical roles in different departments, John joined the Central Statistical Office as a senior civil servant in 1992. He was the project manager for the creation of the Office for National Statistics and was the policy lead on the development of the GSS. He has worked on diverse projects and topics, including responsibility for flagship publications like 'Social Trends', leading the neighbourhood statistics programme as well as being actively involved in the creation of the Statistics Commission and National Statistics in 2000. In 2004, John became the 14th librarian to the House of Commons. He continued to be involved in the statistical community and took up the presidency of the Royal Statistical Society on 1 January 2013. Tom Smith Tom is managing director at the UK government's Data Science Campus, which explores how new data sources such as earth observation data, images and social media can help us better understand the economy and society. A data addict with 20 years’ experience using data and analysis to improve public services, Tom originally trained as a physicist with a PhD in training neural networks for robot control.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Pages
    The Parliamentary and Scientific Committee Annual Report 2010 THE PARLIAMENTARY AND SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE (An Associate Parliamentary Group including Members of the Associate Parliamentary Engineering Group) Established 1939 The Parliamentary and Scientific Committee is a primary focus for scientific and technological issues providing a long-term liaison between Parliamentarians and scientific and engineering bodies, science-based industry, academia and organisations representing those significantly affected by science. The main aim is to focus on those issues where science and politics meet, informing Members of both Houses of Parliament by indicating the relevance of scientific and technological developments to matters of public interest and to the development of policy. The Committee meets once a month when Parliament is sitting to debate a scientific or engineering topic and its relationship with political issues. These debates take place in the Palace of Westminster, starting at 5.30pm and are usually followed by informal receptions. Attendance is typically 60 –80. Most debates are followed by a working dinner where the informal atmosphere facilitates open and wide-ranging discussion between interested Parliamentarians and those most closely concerned with the evening’s topic. The Committee arranges visits to industrial and scientific establishments. Typically a party of a dozen or so will include two or three Parliamentarians who will thereby have an in-depth introduction to some aspect of the real world of science and technology. Cover photograph Parliamentary copyright images are reproduced with the permission of Parliament. Foreword by the President The Rt Hon the Lord Jenkin of Roding The President’s Foreword to the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee Annual Report is an opportunity to reflect upon current issues and future opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • John Pullinger's Biography
    JOHN PULLINGER CB BIOGRAPHY As Librarian of the House of Commons between 2004 and 2014, John Pullinger was responsible for broadening the range of information and research services available to MPs, particularly backbench Members. He also led work to improve the connection between Parliament and its Committees and the public, notably the development of online services and the creation of the Parliamentary Education Centre. As well as his work in the UK, he chaired an International Parliamentary Union conference on informing democracy and was involved in parliamentary strengthening projects in Iraq, Myanmar and elsewhere. He was awarded a CB for services to Parliament and the community in the Queen’s 2014 New Year’s Honours list. Between 2014 and 2019, John Pullinger was UK National Statistician, developing and delivering a strategy to enhance the trustworthiness, quality and value of official statistics to support political debate and decisions at UK, devolved administration and local levels. During this period, he Chaired the United Nations Commission responsible for setting measurement standards at the global level. He was also President of the Royal Statistical Society between 2013 and 2014. Since completing his term as National Statistician, John Pullinger has held a number of non-executive and advisory roles including Trustee of the Nuffield Foundation, President of the International Association for Official Statistics and Board member of the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development Data. He is a fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, a visiting professor at Imperial College, London, a governor of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, a graduate of Harvard Business School and Exeter University and has been awarded honorary doctorates by the universities of Exeter, Essex and the West of England.
    [Show full text]
  • The First 50 Years of the Government Economic Service Lecture by Dave
    The First 50 years of The Government Economic Service Lecture by Dave Ramsden 27 April 2015 1. [Slide 1] Welcome to King’s. Thanks to the Strand Group at the Policy Institute here at King’s and to Hewlett Packard for hosting this lecture and to all of you for attending.1 2. The Government Economic Service (GES) was created in October 1964. The new Wilson Government, with a majority of four, embarked on a more planned approach to the UK economy.2 The Department of Economic Affairs (DEA) was created with a longer term mandate, with HM Treasury meant to focus more on its Finance Ministry role. 3. [Slide 2] Several of the new Special Advisers were economists, including Robert Neild,3 who re-joined HMT. Alec Cairncross, as Head of the Treasury’s Economic Section the Government’s chief economist, worked to ensure the section stayed under civil service management. It did and Cairncross in his words “ended up with the title Head of the Government Economic Service. Ironically the Economic Service has survived to this day while the Economic Section vanished in the 1980s”.4 4. Ironically, because the fledgling GES, 22 strong of whom 18 were already in the Economic Section, was for Cairncross “at first largely a fantasy”, with little influence over staffing or resources. 5. As we are well into 2015 we can mark another anniversary: 100 years ago in 1915 Keynes started working in the Treasury.5 1 I would like to thank my colleagues Lisa Barrance, Andrew Gurney, Leeanne Johnston, Nayeem Khan, Nick Macpherson, Charlotte McKinley, Jake Nelson, Mario Pisani, James Richardson and Daniel Tomlinson for their help and comments.
    [Show full text]