Education, Culture and Sport Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Education, Culture and Sport Committee EDUCATION, CULTURE AND SPORT COMMITTEE Tuesday 22 January 2002 (Afternoon) Session 1 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2002. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Tuesday 22 January 2002 Col. ITEM IN PRIVATE ............................................................................................................................................. 2981 EDUCATION (DISABILITY STRATEGIES AND PUPILS’ RECORDS) (SCOTLAND) BILL: STAGE 1 .............................. 2982 SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION ........................................................................................................................... 3018 Panels of Persons to Safeguard the Interests of Children (Scotland) Regulations 2001 (SSI 2001/476) ....................................................................................................................................... 3018 Curators ad Litem and Reporting Officers (Panels) (Scotland) Regulations 2001 (SSI 2001/477) .......... 3018 Children’s Hearings (Legal Representation) (Scotland) Rules 2001 (SSI 2001/478) ............................... 3018 NATIONAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ........................................................................................................... 3030 EDUCATION, CULTURE AND SPORT COMMITTEE 3rd Meeting 2002, Session 1 CONVENER *Karen Gillon (Clydesdale) (Lab) DEPUTY CONVENER *Mr Frank McAveety (Glasgow Shettleston) (Lab) COMMITTEE MEMBERS *Jackie Baillie (Dumbarton) (Lab) *Ian Jenkins (Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale) (LD) *Irene McGugan (North-East Scotland) (SNP) *Mr Brian Monteith (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) *Michael Russell (South of Scotland) (SNP) *attended THE FOLLOWING ALSO ATTENDED: Mr Gil Paterson (Central Scotland) (SNP) WITNESSES Maggi Allan (South Lanarkshire Council) Sam Baker (Scottish Executive Education Department) Heather Fiskin (Disability Rights Commission) Adam Gaines (Disability Rights Commission) Susan Grant (Children in Scotland) Kate Higgins (Capability Scotland) Sandra Kerley (Capability Scotland) Councillor Helen Law (Convention of Scottish Local Authorities) Boyd McAdam (Scottish Executive Education Department) Linda Sneddon (Office of the Solicitor to the Scottish Executive) Nicol Stephen (Deputy Minister for Education and Young People) Kay Tisdall (Children in Scotland) Neil Todd (Children in Scotland) Lynn Townsend (West Dunbartonshire Council) Martin Vallely (Children in Scotland) Lindsey Wright (Scottish Executive Education Department) CLERK TO THE COMMITTEE Martin Verity SENIOR ASSISTANT CLERK Susan Duffy ASSISTANT CLERK Ian Cowan LOCATION Committee Room 3 2981 22 JANUARY 2002 2982 Scottish Parliament Education (Disability Strategies Education, Culture and Sport and Pupils’ Records) Committee (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1 Tuesday 22 January 2002 The Convener: This afternoon we are taking stage 1 evidence on the general principles of the (Afternoon) Education (Disability Strategies and Pupils’ Records) (Scotland) Bill. I welcome Nicol Stephen, [THE CONVENER opened the meeting at 13:32] who is the Deputy Minister for Education and Young People, and officials from the Scottish Executive. Before we move to questions, minister, would you like to make any introductory remarks? Item in Private The Deputy Minister for Education and The Convener (Karen Gillon): Do members Young People (Nicol Stephen): Yes, thank you, agree that we should go into private session to convener. First, I will introduce my team of discuss agenda item 2? officials. Sam Baker is responsible for the overall co-ordination of the bill in the Executive. Sam Members indicated agreement. works in the special educational needs unit of the education department. She has a particular 13:32 interest in the detail of the disability strategies element of the bill. Lindsey Wright is responsible Meeting continued in private. for the access to the pupils’ records element of the bill. She works in the teachers and schools 14:36 division of the education department. Shirley Ferguson works in the office of the solicitor of the Meeting continued in public. Scottish Executive and has special responsibility The Convener: We are now back in public for the bill. session. Will members please ensure that all The two elements of the bill—the disability mobile telephones and pagers are switched off or strategies and the pupils’ records—are not related. are in silent mode? In my opening remarks, I will pay more attention to the first element. The second element, on pupils’ records, is intended to sort out what legal draftsmen like to call an “unintended effect” of a previous piece of legislation—the Data Protection Act 1998. That act removed a right from parents that no one, I think, wanted to be removed. It is estimated that around 800,000 adults in Scotland have a disability. Many become disabled during their adult life but many others will have had a disability since birth or since a young age. The bill will be important in helping to ensure that everyone in Scotland gets the best possible start in life and can go on to make a significant contribution to our society. Section 2 of the Standards in Scotland’s Schools etc Act 2000 requires education authorities “to secure that the education is directed to the development of the personality, talents and mental and physical abilities of the child … to their fullest potential.” The bill is needed to help education providers to deliver that requirement for children with disabilities. Although many examples of good practice exist throughout Scotland, in many areas a lot of work still has to be done. The inclusion of pupils with disabilities will not happen simply by moving children from special to 2983 22 JANUARY 2002 2984 mainstream schools. We will need plans to wants to take the opportunity to create the remove barriers to participation in schools and necessary powers to enable us to reinstate an nursery schools across Scotland to ensure that independent right for parents in Scotland to pupils can benefit from mainstream education. The access their children’s school records. Parents bill will support the new duties not to discriminate were given that independent right back in 1990, against pupils on the ground of a disability. Those but it was unintentionally removed when the Data duties will come into force across Great Britain in Protection Act 1998 extended data protection September this year; they will make it unlawful for legislation to manual as well as to electronic files. schools or education authorities to discriminate The bill intends to sort out that problem. against any child. The Disability Strategies and I will stop there. I am happy to answer Pupils’ Records (Scotland) Bill will complement questions. and support those duties. The Convener: Thank you, minister. Before we The bill will require responsible bodies to take move to questions, I welcome Gil Paterson, who is positive action, rather than simply not to here as a reporter on behalf of the Equal discriminate. That positive action must involve Opportunities Committee. You are very welcome, proactively planning for the future of all pupils with Gil, and I hope that you will be able to participate disabilities in all the education establishments for in our discussions. which the bodies are responsible. Mr Frank McAveety (Glasgow Shettleston) Accessibility strategies will consider accessibility (Lab): A number of submissions to the committee in the broadest sense—I especially want to have raised the issue of the format of information, emphasise that point. Physical access to buildings and we will take further evidence on that issue. At will, of course, be an important part of accessibility least two or three submissions have mentioned strategies, but access to the curriculum and to references to information being in writing only. Is information are equally important—some would there a willingness to reconsider the matter to see say more important. Being able to get around a whether we can find other accessible formats to building is not, on its own, enough. Children suit people’s needs? should be involved in lessons and should be able to learn in ways that are suitable for them. Nicol Stephen: The answer to that question is yes. It is important that the bill specifies that the Some people seem to view the bill, and information is to be provided in a written format. accessibility strategies, as being about physical That does not exclude making information disabilities only. That is not the case. The available in the other ways that we would expect strategies include all pupils with all kinds of from a bill that deals with individuals with disabilities. Education providers must plan for disabilities. The only issue is whether those other pupils with problems such as dyslexia or autistic ways should be defined in the bill or whether that spectrum disorder. With the right support, those can be achieved through regulation or guidance. children should be able to get
Recommended publications
  • Spice Briefing
    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Msps Not Standing Or Not Returned in the 2003
    SESSION 1 MSPS NOT STANDING OR NOT Scottish RETURNED IN THE 2003 ELECTION Parliament Fact sheet A number of MSPs did not return to the Scottish Parliament in Session 2. They either did not stand for re-election or they stood as a candidate but were not re-elected. MSPs: Historical This fact sheets is divided into two sections. The first section lists Series those MSPs who stood for re-election but failed to win a seat. The second section lists those MSPs who were serving at the end of the 25 October 2005 first parliamentary session (31 March 2003) but chose not to stand for re-election. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Ind Independent Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party 1 MSPs that stood for re-election but failed to win a seat Brian Fitzpatrick Lab Strathkelvin & Bearsden Kenny Gibson SNP Glasgow Rhoda Grant Lab Highlands & Islands Iain Gray Lab Edinburgh Pentlands Keith Harding Con Mid Scotland & Fife John McAllion Lab Dundee East Irene McGugan SNP North East Scotland Lyndsay McIntosh Con Central Scotland Angus Mackay Lab Edinburgh South Fiona McLeod SNP West of Scotland Gil Paterson SNP Central Scotland Lloyd Quinan SNP West of Scotland Michael Russell SNP South of Scotland Dr Richard Simpson Lab Ochil Elaine Thomson Lab Aberdeen North Andrew Wilson SNP Central Scotland MSPs that did not stand for re-election Name Party Constituency or Region Colin Campbell SNP West of Scotland Dorothy-Grace Elder Ind Glasgow Dr Winnie Ewing SNP Highlands & Islands Duncan Hamilton SNP Highlands & Islands Ian Jenkins LD Tweeddale, Ettrick & Lauderdale Rt Hon Henry McLeish Lab Central Fife Rt Hon Sir David Steel KBE LD Lothians Kay Ullrich SNP West of Scotland Ben Wallace Con North East Scotland John Young OBE Con West of Scotland Scottish Parliament Fact sheet 2 Contacting the Public Information Service For more information you can visit our website at http://www.scottish.parliament.uk or contact the Public Information Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Msps by Party: Session 1
    MSP BY PARTY SESSION 1 Scottish Parliament This Fact sheet provides a list of all MSPs who served during Session 1, 6 May 1999 – 31 March 2003, arranged by party. Fact sheet The MSPs are listed in alphabetical order, by the party that they were elected to represent, with the party with most MSPs listed first. MSPs: Historical Statistical information about the number of MSPs in each party Series throughout session 1 can be found on the State of the Parties: Session 1 fact sheet. 9 January 2008 1 Scottish Labour Party Name Constituency / Region Wendy Alexander Paisley North Jackie Baillie Dumbarton Scott Barrie Dunfermline West Sarah Boyack Edinburgh Central Rhona Brankin Midlothian Bill Butler1 Glasgow Anniesland Malcolm Chisholm Edinburgh North and Leith Cathie Craigie Cumbernauld and Kilsyth Margaret Curran Glasgow Baillieston Susan Deacon Edinburgh East and Musselburgh Donald Dewar2 Glasgow Anniesland Helen Eadie Dunfermline East Patricia Ferguson Glasgow Maryhill Brian Fitzpatrick3 Strathkelvin and Bearsden Sam Galbraith4 Strathkelvin and Bearsden Karen Gillon Clydesdale Trish Godman West Renfrewshire Rhoda Grant Highlands and Islands Iain Gray Edinburgh Pentlands Hugh Henry Paisley South John Home Robertson East Lothian Janis Hughes Glasgow Rutherglen Gordon Jackson Glasgow Govan Sylvia Jackson Stirling Cathy Jamieson Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley Margaret Jamieson Kilmarnock and Loudoun Andy Kerr East Kilbride Johann Lamont Glasgow Polllok Marilyn Livingstone Kirkcaldy 1 Bill Butler was elected in the Glasgow Anniesland by-election on 23 November 2000. He replaced Donald Dewar 2 Donald Dewar died on 11 October 2000. He was replaced by Bill Butler 3 Brian Fitzpatrick was elected in the Strathkelvin and Bearsden by-election on 7 June 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Parliament
    MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Wednesday 6 September 2000 (Afternoon) Volume 8 No 1 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2000. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Wednesday 6 September 2000 SCOTTISH MINISTERS AND DEPUTY MINISTERS PRESIDING OFFICERS SCOTTISH PARLIAMENTARY CORPORATE BODY PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU COMMITTEE CONVENERS AND DEPUTY CONVENERS SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT STAFF Debates Col. TIME FOR REFLECTION .......................................................................................................................................... 1 BUSINESS MOTION ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Motion moved—[Mr McCabe]—and agreed to. Amendment moved—[Mr Salmond]—and disagreed to. Amendment moved—[David McLetchie]—and disagreed to. The Minister for Parliament (Mr Tom McCabe) ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report
    TRANSPORT AND THE ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Wednesday 5 September 2001 (Morning) Session 1 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2001. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Wednesday 5 September 2001 Col. INTERESTS ......................................................................................................................................... 1975 ITEM IN PRIVATE .................................................................................................................................. 1976 SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION.................................................................................................................. 1977 PETITIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 1979 SEA CAGE FISH FARMING ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Msps by Constituency and Region
    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Electing the Lords: How Did That Work out for the Lib Dems?
    Electing the Lords: How Did That Work Out for the Lib Dems? A Study into the Effectiveness of the Interim Peers Panel System for Electing Liberal Democrat Nominees to the House of Lords, 1999-2015 Dr Seth Thévoz September 2015 1 Acknowledgements I would like to express my thanks to the numerous Liberal Democrat peers who helped with my queries in compiling this pamphlet; and to Simon Radford for his comments and feedback upon reading an early draft. Seth Thévoz London September 2015 The views and opinions expressed in this pamphlet are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of the Social Liberal Forum. ©Seth Thévoz, 2015. Published and promoted by Seth Thévoz on behalf of the Social Liberal Forum, both at Social Liberal Forum, MRG Building, 54 Commercial Street, London, E1 6LT. 2 Contents Introduction: The Lib Dem Peers – Who Put Them There? 4 The Interim Peers Panel Explained 9 The Role of Patronage and the Party Leader 10 The Panel’s Electorate 11 The Kennedy Years (1999-2006) 12 The Campbell Years (2006-7) 12 The Clegg Years (2007-15) 13 The Legitimacy of the Elected List 15 The Legitimacy of Unelected Nominees 15 The Effect of Patronage on Internal Party Democracy 17 The Growth of the Ex Officios on the Interim Peers Panel 22 Conclusion 23 Policy Recommendations 24 Bibliography 25 About the Author 27 3 Introduction: The Lib Dem Peers – Who Put Them There? “I mean, if I went ‘round saying I was an Emperor, just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they’d put me away!” Michael Palin, Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975) With a parliamentary party consisting of 112 peers and 8 MPs, the Liberal Democrats now have the largest ratio of peers-to-MPs at any time in the history of any major UK political party.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion Debated
    Col Timber Industry 12527 The Deputy Presiding Officer (Mr George Reid): The final item of business today—and, indeed, of our stay in Aberdeen—is a members' business debate on motion S1M-2953, in the name of Alex Fergusson, on the timber industry. The debate will be concluded without any questions being put. Motion debated, That the Parliament acknowledges the value of timber as a primary product within rural Scotland and the 11,000 jobs which are dependent on that industry; recognises the very real difficulties faced by some rural local authorities in maintaining and improving minor roads for timber extraction, and believes that the Scottish Executive should meet COSLA's Rural Affairs Committee and representatives of the forestry industry to determine a satisfactory way forward, recognising that the placing of weight restriction orders, which effectively landlock large areas of mature timber, is not a realistic solution. 17:09 Alex Fergusson (South of Scotland) (Con): I begin by saying how very pleased I am that this motion has been picked for the pinnacle of our short sojourn here in the city of Aberdeen. I take the opportunity, as others have done, to thank all those involved in making our stay such a successful and enjoyable experience. To be picked to complete the proceedings is indeed a privilege. I hope that I make a rather better job of speaking to this motion than I did of writing an article on the subject in "Holyrood Magazine" a couple of weeks ago. I scribbled an 800-word article at the very last minute and I did not even have time to proof read it.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE QUESTIONS TO THE HRST MINISTER OF SCOTLAND A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy BY JEFFERY J. GENTRY Norman, Oklahoma 2003 UMI Number: 3082962 UMI UMI Microform 3082962 Copyright 2003 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 © Copyright by Jeffery J.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report to Be Forwarded to Them Should Give Notice at the Document Supply Centre
    EDUCATION, CULTURE AND SPORT COMMITTEE Tuesday 29 May 2001 (Afternoon) Session 1 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2001. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Tuesday 29 May 2001 Col. ITEM IN PRIVATE ............................................................................................................................................. 2333 BUDGET PROCESS 2002-03 ............................................................................................................................ 2334 CHILDREN'S COMMISSIONER ........................................................................................................................... 2344 COMMITTEE TRAVEL ....................................................................................................................................... 2347 EDUCATION, CULTURE AND SPORT COMMITTEE 17th Meeting 2001, Session 1 CONVENER *Karen Gillon (Clydesdale) (Lab) DEPUTY CONVENER *Cathy
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Results 2007
    Local Election Results May 2007 Andrew Teale August 12, 2017 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2007 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2011. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”. This file is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ The LATEX source code is available for download at http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/pdf/2007-source.zip Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Change Log 12th August 2017: Correction to Market ward, Cambridge (thanks to Colin Rosentiel). 1st August 2015: Gain information added for Walsall. 14th April 2015: The seat won by Gwenda Thomas in the Welsh Assembly was Neath, not Gower. 1st April 2015: Blandford Old Town ward, North Dorset was LD gain from C. 22nd March 2015: Chadsmead ward, Lichfield was 1 LD gain from Lab, not 1 LD gain from C. 15th March 2015: Dorchester East ward, West Dorset was 2 LD holds; Dor- chester North ward, West Dorset was 1 LD gain from Ind. 13th March 2015: Winstanley ward, Blaby was 1 C gain from Lab; Calverton ward, Gedling was 2 Calverton First Independents gain from Lab.. 1st March 2015: Consolidated results for Taunton Deane corrected.
    [Show full text]
  • Ppp School Modernisation Projects and the Loss of Open Space in Scotland
    PPP SCHOOL MODERNISATION PROJECTS AND THE LOSS OF OPEN SPACE IN SCOTLAND Holmhills Wood Community Park Action Group (HWCAG) October 2005 © Holmhills Wood Community Park Action Group (HWCAG) For further information or copies of this report, contact: Holmhills Wood Community Park Action Group 92 Stewarton Drive, Cambuslang Glasgow, G72 8DJ Tel: 0141 641 6890 Email: [email protected] ii Preface This report is the first-ever national survey of how PPP school projects are damaging Scotland’s greenspace. It examines how, across Scotland, Councils are building new schools on parks and community playing fields, often at the behest of multinational construction companies and their advisers, whose concept of ‘best value’ cares little for the interests of communities or the environment. The report has been drafted by the Holmhills Wood Community Park Action Group (HWCAG). HWCAG is a community group set up to voice public opposition to South Lanarkshire Council’s plans to rebuild two schools on a public park, taking one-third of the park area from free community use. In the course of its campaign, HWCAG realised that South Lanarkshire Council is not alone in its environmental vandalism. We found that South Lanarkshire is just one – albeit one of the worst offenders – in a long list of local authorities building schools on Scotland’s greenspace. This prompted HWCAG to undertake a national survey, using Freedom of Information requests, of the open space implications of all Scottish Councils’ PPP programmes. We also investigated the role of the key statutory consultees (sportscotland, Scottish Natural Heritage) and the oversight role meant to be exercised by the Scottish Executive.
    [Show full text]