Appendix Volume Ii of Iii

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix Volume Ii of Iii NO. 19-__ In the Supreme Court of the United States COMCAST CORPORATION, ET AL., Petitioners, V. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, ET AL., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT APPENDIX VOLUME II OF III DONALD B. VERRILLI, JR. DAVID J. LISSON Counsel of Record DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL GINGER D. ANDERS LLP MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 1600 El Camino Real 1155 F Street NW 7th Floor Menlo Park, CA 94025 Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 220-1100 [email protected] BRIAN J. SPRINGER MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 350 S. Grand Ave., 50th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Counsel for the Comcast petitioners (Additional counsel listed on inside cover) PAUL M. BARTKOWSKI MITCHELL G. STOCKWELL ADDUCI, MASTRIANI & MICHAEL J. TURTON SCHAUMBERG LLP JOSHUA H. LEE 1133 Connecticut Ave. NW, KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & 12th Floor STOCKTON LLP Washington, D.C. 20036 1100 Peachtree St. NE, Ste. 2800 Counsel for the Technicolor Atlanta, GA 30309 Petitioners JOSHUA B. POND KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP 607 14th St NW, Ste. 900 Washington, D.C. 20005 Counsel for the ARRIS Petitioners TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume I Appendix A: Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (March 2, 2020) ......................................................... 1a Appendix B: Opinion of the United States International Trade Commission (December 6, 2017) ................................................. 18a Appendix C: Initial Determination of the United States International Trade Commission (May 26, 2017) ................................... 75a Volume II Appendix C: Initial Determination of the United States International Trade Commission (May 26, 2017) (continued) .............. 343a Volume III Appendix C: Initial Determination of the United States International Trade Commission (May 26, 2017) (continued) .............. 693a Appendix D: Relevant Cease and Desist and Limited Exclusion Orders of the United States International Trade Commission ........................ 950a Appendix E: Statutory Provisions ...................... 1016a 343a bidirectional remote access link.” The construction comports with the plain purpose of the “remote . device” and also accounts for the additional words (e.g., interactive television) in this term. See CAE Screenplates, 224 F.3d at 1317 (“In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, we must presume that the use of these different terms in the claims connotes different meanings.”). (6) User television equipment This term appears in claims 1, 2, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18, and it is used many times in the specification. See generally JX-0002. The parties have proposed the following constructions: Rovi’s Proposed Comcast’s Proposed Construction Construction any equipment capable of Comcast does not clearly use by a user to display present a construction in program listings and to its post-hearing brief. record television programs See Rovi Br. at 49; Resps. Br. at 81-82. Rovi’s opening argument for this term follows: One of ordinary skill in the art would agree with Rovi’s proposed construction—“any equipment capable of use by a user to display program listings and to record television programs.” CX- 0002C (Shamos WS) at Q/A 112. The specifications make clear that “user television equipment” is a broad term. Id.; JX-0002 (’263 Patent) at col. 6, ln. 64 344a - col. 7, ln. 1. Further, Figs. 3 and 4 of the ’263 Patent show the user television equipment as including a television 36, remote control 40, secondary storage device 32, set-top box 28, digital storage device 31, user interface 46, digital storage device 49, secondary storage device 47, communications device 51 and display device 45. JX-0002 (’263 Patent) at Figs. 3-4. In the Patents, the recited purpose of the “user television equipment” is to display program listing and record television programs. CX- 0002C (Shamos WS) at Q/A 112. What records television programs thus falls within the scope of “television equipment.” CX-1901C (Shamos RWS) at Q/A 37 (discussing additional intrinsic evidence in support of Rovi’s construction). Rovi Br. at 49. Comcast’s argument for this term follows: The party’s [sic] proposed construction [sic] of “user television equipment” are provided in RDX-0842. Comcast’s proposed construction is consistent with the plain and ordinary meaning of this limitation to one of ordinary skill in the art in light of the intrinsic evidence. RX- 0007C at Q/A 174. There are two problems with Rovi’s construction. First, it is overbroad because it would read the word “television” out of the claims. For 345a example, Rovi’s construction would cover a personal computer, which is capable of being configured to display program listings and record television programs but is inarguably not a “television” as a POSITA would understood. RX-0007C at Q/A 175. Second, Rovi’s construction leads to the absurd result that the agreed construction for “user site” would no longer be limited to the site of the user when Rovi’s construction of “user television equipment” is combined with the other agreed constructions. Because “user television equipment” would no longer be limited to a television in Rovi’s construction, the equipment would not need to be in the user’s home. But the parties have agreed that “user site” means “location of the user equipment” and that “user equipment” means “user television equipment.” Thus, “user site” means “location of the [user television equipment].” Under Rovi’s overbroad construction of “user television equipment” this would mean that “user site” is no longer limited to a fixed point, like the user’s home. This would render the “user site” limitation meaningless. This problem is averted by adopting Comcast’s construction which would lead to a “user site” construction of “location of the television equipment associated with the user.” This construction makes sense and is consistent with the plain and ordinary meaning. 346a Rovi criticizes Comcast’s construction by arguing that “associated with a user” is unclear. See CX-0002C (Shamos WS) at Q/A 113. Dr. Shamos’s hypothetical where a television could potentially be associated with users A, B, and C does not present a problem. It would not be difficult for a POSITA to determine that the television equipment is associated with a single subscriber whether or not it is available to multiple individuals within that household. See RX-0007C at Q/A 179. Resps. Br. at 81-82. Rovi replies: Respondents misrepresent the scope of the inventions and the specifications, stating: “Rovi’s construction [of user television equipment] would cover a personal computer, which is capable of being configured to display program listings and record television programs but is inarguably not a ‘television’ as a POSITA would understood [sic].” Resps. Br. at 81. The specifications of the Asserted Patents explicitly state that “user television equipment” includes a personal computer: “[o]ther suitable types of user television equipment may be based on personal computer televisions (PC/TVs). .” JX-0003 (’801 Patent) at 4:17-20, 11:59-62, 31:61-65. Thus, Respondents’ argument is unpersuasive. 347a Rovi Reply at 32. The administrative law judge construes the term “user television equipment” to mean “equipment for displaying television program listings information and other program guide data using a local interactive television program guide.” See JX-0002 at 7:61-64 (“Each user has user television equipment 22 for displaying the television program listings information and other program guide data using a local interactive television program guide.”). Further, this construction is consistent with the specification, and it also allows for other uses such as the display of programming (e.g., watching television shows). Rovi’s construction is overly broad to the extent it seeks to encompass “any equipment.” Conversely, Rovi’s construction is overly narrow to the extent it requires the user television equipment “to record.” While the preamble of claim 1 indicates that the claimed system is “for recording,” the body of the claim indicates that “the local interactive television program guide . records the television program . using the local interactive television program guide equipment.” See JX-0002 at 28:59-63. (7) Generates[/ing] . a display Claim 1 of the ’263 Patent utilizes the term “generates a display” twice. See JX-0002 at 28:35, 28:44 (“Generates a display” only appears in claims 5, 8, 11, 14, and 17. It does not appear in the specification). The parties have proposed the following constructions: 348a Rovi’s Proposed Comcast’s Proposed Construction Construction Generates[/ing] data Comcast does not clearly representing a display present a construction in its post-hearing brief. Rovi Br. at 49; Resps. Br. at 82-83. Rovi’s opening argument for this phrase follows: One of ordinary skill in the art would agree with Rovi’s construction— “generates[/ing] data representing a display.” CX-0002C (Shamos WS) at Q/A 114. This straightforward construction explains what generating a display means and is consistent with the disclosure in the specifications. See JX- 0002 (’263 Patent) at col. 6, lns. 1-8, col. 9, lns. 15-19, col. 14, lns. 2-19, col. 20, lns. 1-5. Respondents’ proposed construction requires that what does the “generating” also “create[s] data sufficient to provide a display” and “provide[s] that data to a display device.” Resps. P.H. Br. at 199- 200. As with the “local interactive television program guide” term, this is another attempt by Respondents to limit the local guide to equipment within the user’s home that must—under Respondents’ construction—“create data sufficient to provide a display” and “provide that data to a display device.” If something other than the television 349a equipment in the user’s home “creates the data,” then, under Respondents’ construction, that would be excluded from the scope of the claims. However, and as discussed previously, the specifications contemplate a client- server based program guide where the program guide server generates program guide display screens as digital frames and distributes the frames to user television equipment 22 of Figure 2d.
Recommended publications
  • Cincinnati Bell-Hawaiian Telcom Merger Receives Hawaii PUC
    Cincinnati Bell-Hawaiian Telcom Merger Receives Hawaiʻi PUC Approval CINCINNATI and HONOLULU, May 4, 2018 – Cincinnati Bell Inc. (NYSE: CBB) (the “Company”) announced that it has received unanimous approval from the Hawaiʻi Public Utilities Commission (“PUC” or the “Commission”) with respect to its pending acquisition of Honolulu-based Hawaiian Telcom (NASDAQ: HCOM), the leading integrated communications provider serving Hawaiʻi and the state’s fiber-centric technology leader. In approving the merger, the Commission concludes that net benefits will result from the transaction. “We greatly appreciate the support of the Hawaiʻi PUC and are pleased that the Commission has acknowledged that our combination with Hawaiian Telcom is expected to bring benefits to Hawaiʻi consumers as we continue to invest in next-generation fiber,” said Leigh Fox, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cincinnati Bell. “This marks a key milestone as we work to create a stronger communications and technology company that builds upon the complementary strengths of Cincinnati Bell and Hawaiian Telcom, allowing us to deliver more competitive products and services to customers.” The combination, previously announced on July 10, 2017, will accelerate Cincinnati Bell’s overarching strategy to create a diversified and balanced revenue mix by expanding the Company’s high-speed, high- bandwidth fiber optic network while building a complementary IT solutions and cloud services business. By leveraging Hawaiian Telcom’s local knowledge and continuing to invest in its deep fiber infrastructure, the combined company will be well-positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for strategic fiber offerings. Hawaiʻi PUC approval satisfies one of the conditions for the closing of the transaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaiian Telcom Terms of Service for Residential Customers
    Hawaiian Telcom Terms of Service & Acceptable Use Policy Hawaiian Telcom Terms of Service and Acceptable Use Policy For Residential Customers WELCOME TO HAWAIIAN TELCOM. THESE TERMS OF SERVICE AND ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY FOR RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS (“TERMS OF SERVICE”) CONTAIN IMPORTANT REQUIREMENTS REGARDING YOUR USE OF HAWAIIAN TELCOM'S HIGH SPEED INTERNET ACCESS SERVICES AND YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH HAWAIIAN TELCOM AND ITS THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS. READ THESE TERMS OF SERVICE CAREFULLY AS THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING YOUR RIGHTS AS WELL AS THOSE OF HAWAIIAN TELCOM. 1. These Terms of Service are entered into by and between the subscriber ("you", "your", or "Subscriber") and Hawaiian Telcom Services Company, Inc. or its affiliate providers of this Agreement ("Hawaiian Telcom", "us" or "we"). Any terms or conditions included on any Service Quotation(s) ("Quotation"), Work Order, Service Agreement, point-of-sale purchase receipt, E-SIGN recording of a non-written contract, Promotional Offer Terms and Conditions, Broadband Policy, Acceptable Use Policy (attached as Appendix A), or Privacy Policy are incorporated into and made a part of these Terms of Service, which collectively form the Agreement between you and Hawaiian Telcom (the “Agreement”). The Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions under which you agree to use the Service (defined below), and under which Hawaiian Telcom agrees to provide the Service to you. By accessing and using the Service, you represent and agree that you have read, understand, and consent to be bound by the Agreement. If you do not consent to be bound by the Agreement, you must not use the Service or register as a subscriber of the Service, and must promptly call the Hawaiian Telcom customer service at (808) 643-3456 or (877)482-2211 to cancel the Service.
    [Show full text]
  • KEEP AMERICANS CONNECTED PLEDGE 185 Providers Have Now Agreed to Take Specific Steps to Promote Connectivity for Americans During the Coronavirus Pandemic
    Media Contact: Tina Pelkey, (202) 418-0536 [email protected] For Immediate Release 116 MORE BROADBAND AND TELEPHONE SERVICE PROVIDERS TAKE CHAIRMAN PAI’S KEEP AMERICANS CONNECTED PLEDGE 185 Providers Have Now Agreed to Take Specific Steps to Promote Connectivity for Americans During the Coronavirus Pandemic WASHINGTON, March 16, 2020—Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai announced today that 116 more broadband and telephone service providers have taken his Keep Americans Connected Pledge. Chairman Pai launched the Keep Americans Connected Pledge on Friday with 69 broadband and telephone providers across the country agreeing to take specific steps to help Americans stay connected for the next 60 days. This afternoon’s announcement means that 185 companies in total have now taken the Pledge. “It’s critical that Americans stay connected throughout the coronavirus pandemic so that they can remain in touch with loved ones, telework, engage in remote learning, participate in telehealth, and maintain the social distancing that is so important to combatting the spread of the virus,” said Chairman Pai. “The Keep Americans Connected Pledge is a critical step toward accomplishing that goal, and I thank each one of these additional companies that have made commitments to ensure that Americans can remain connected as a result of these exceptional circumstances.” New pledge-takers include Advanced Communications Technology, Agri-Valley Communications, Alaska Communications, Appalachian Wireless, ATMC, Ben Lomand Connect, BEVCOMM, Blackfoot
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION in the Matter of ) ) HAWAIIAN TELCOM, INC. ) WCB/Pricing File No. 06-19 ) Petition for a Waiv
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) HAWAIIAN TELCOM, INC. ) WCB/Pricing File No. 06-19 ) Petition for a Waiver of Sections 61.42(g), 61.38, ) And 61.49 of the Commission’s Price Cap Rules ) for Advanced Services Formerly Offered by ) Verizon Hawaii, Inc. ) REPLY COMMENTS OF HAWAIIAN TELCOM, INC. Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. (“Hawaiian Telcom”), through its attorneys, hereby responds to the comments of Pacific LightNet, Inc. (“Pacific LightNet”) on its above-captioned Petition for Waiver (“Petition”). Hawaiian Telcom respectfully requests that the Commission expeditiously grant the Petition without regard for the irrelevant comments of Pacific LightNet. In its Petition, Hawaiian Telcom requested a waiver of the Commission’s rules to maintain the status quo with respect to certain interstate advanced services that are currently tariffed outside of the Commission’s system of price cap rate regulation, pursuant to a series of waivers granted to Hawaiian Telcom’s predecessor, Verizon Hawaii. In its comments, Pacific LightNet cites Hawaiian Telcom’s voluntary commitment to the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission (“HPUC”) not to submit any “application for a general utility rate increase that would utilize a prospective test year earlier than calendar year 2009,” absent a “compelling financial need.”1 In light of this commitment, Pacific LightNet requests clarification of Hawaiian Telcom’s statement in its Petition that, by granting Hawaiian Telcom’s waiver request, the Commission could eliminate any possibility that future rate reductions for advanced services 1 Application of Paradise Mergersub, Inc., GTE Corporation, Verizon Hawaii Inc., Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc., and Verizon Select Services, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • David Michael Karl the MAN BEHIND the SCIENCE
    Noelo DELVE SEEK OUT VERIFY David Michael Karl THE MAN BEHIND THE SCIENCE RESEARCH AND INNOVATI ON AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I - 2020 Delve. Delve. Verify. Seek. MESSAGE FROM THE VICE PRESIDENT University of Throughout history, the world has faced numerous Hawai‘i System health crises that have tested the mettle and resolve of its citizens — the Spanish flu, measles, polio, HIV/AIDS, David Lassner, PhD SARS and Ebola. Today, our world is confronted by the President COVID-19 pandemic, an unprecedented health crisis Vassilis L. Syrmos, PhD Vice President for that has rapidly spread across continents, overwhelmed Research and Innovation modern health care systems and caused widespread disruption of the global economy. NOELO, WHICH MEANS “to delVE, SEEK OUT OR verify” IN HAWAIIAN, IS Hawai‘i with its heavy dependency on tourism, is now at an economic crossroad. with high hotel THE RESEARCH MAGAZINE vacancies, idled tour operations and restricted air travel, other businesses such as restaurants and OF THE UNIVERSITY OF retail stores are also suffering from almost non-existent visitor counts. even after a vaccine for HAWai‘i SYSTEM PUBLISHED ANNUALLY BY THE OFFICE COVId-19 is developed or the effects of the disease are mitigated, the “new normal” may suggest OF THE VICE PRESIDENT FOR that changes to the travel industry and in visitor habits could result in smaller or diminishing RESEARCH AND INNOVATION. returns from the state’s primary industry. economic diversification is not only key to Hawai‘i’s economic recovery from the pandemic, PROJECT MANAGER it is also vital to its long-term economic stability and health.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cloud Is Here: Embrace the Transition
    Hybrid cloud SaaS IaaS Private cloud Public cloud PaaS The cloud is here: embrace the transition How organizations can stop worrying and learn to “think cloud” Clouds in the forecast 3 The cloud’s sunny side 4 Avoid common pitfalls 6 Doing cloud “right” 12 Follow the steps 16 Conclusion 21 Contacts 22 Endnotes 23 The cloud is here: embrace the transition | Introduction Clouds in the forecast The emergence of cloud computing has business and information technology (IT) leaders asking fundamental questions: How can we better understand the risks and opportunities that cloud computing presents? How do we take advantage of these opportunities, not fall behind, and not make costly mistakes? How do we survive and thrive in the cloud? The growth and maturation of the cloud Some notable examples of leading marketplace has not only proven the software deployed via cloud services viability of commercial cloud offerings include business productivity suites (such but also represents a fundamental shift as Google G Suite, Microsoft Office 365), in technology management philosophy. customer relationship management With traditional practices garnering limited (e.g., Salesforce.com), enterprise service return on investment and providing limited management (e.g., ServiceNow), talent business agility, organizations are moving management (e.g., SuccessFactors, Taleo), away from the do‑it‑yourself mentality and and even full suites of Enterprise Resource toward using technology services from Planning (ERP) solutions. This list is rapidly cloud services providers (CSPs), who can do expanding as software companies begin things better, faster, and often cheaper. the transition from delivering their software as on‑premise installations to software While many organizations are apprehensive as a service (SaaS) delivery models.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Presentation April 2018
    Investor Presentation April 2018 1 Safe Harbor This presentation may contain “forward-looking” statements, as defined in federal securities laws including the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are based on our current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the beliefs, expectations and future plans and strategies of the Company, are forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The following important factors, among other things, could cause or contribute to actual results being materially and adversely different from those described or implied by such forward-looking statements including, but not limited to: those discussed in this release; we operate in highly competitive industries, and customers may not continue to purchase products or services, which would result in reduced revenue and loss of market share; we may be unable to grow our revenues and cash flows despite the initiatives we have implemented; failure to anticipate the need for and introduce new products and services or to compete with new technologies may compromise our success in the telecommunications industry; our access lines, which generate a significant portion of our cash flows and profits, are decreasing in number and if we continue to experience access line losses similar to the past several years, our revenues, earnings and cash flows from operations may be adversely impacted; negotiations
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated High Definition LED Television User's Guide
    Integrated High Definition LED Television User’s Guide: 32L4300U / 39L4300U / 50L4300U / 58L4300U 50L7300U / 58L7300U / 65L7300U If you need assistance: Toshiba's Support Web site support.toshiba.com For more information, see “Troubleshooting” on page 160 in this guide. Owner's Record The model number and serial number are on the back and side of your television. Record these numbers, whenever you communicate with your Toshiba dealer about this Television. Model name: Serial number: Register your Toshiba Television at register.toshiba.com Note: To display a High Definition picture, the TV must be receiving a High Definition signal (such as an over- the-air High Definition TV broadcast, a High Definition digital cable program, or a High Definition digital satellite program). For details, contact your TV antenna installer, cable provider, or GMA300019013 satellite provider 6/13 2 CHILD SAFETY: PROPER TELEVISION PLACEMENT MATTERS TOSHIBA CARES • Manufacturers, retailers and the rest of the consumer electronics industry are committed to making home entertainment safe and enjoyable. • As you enjoy your television, please note that all televisions – new and old- must be supported on proper stands or installed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Televisions that are inappropriately situated on dressers, bookcases, shelves, desks, speakers, chests, carts, etc., may fall over, resulting in injury. TUNE IN TO SAFETY • ALWAYS follow the manufacturer’s recommendations for the safe installation of your television. • ALWAYS read and follow all instructions for proper use of your television. • NEVER allow children to climb on or play on the television or the furniture on which the television is placed. • NEVER place the television on furniture that can easily be used as steps, such as a chest of drawers.
    [Show full text]
  • TITLE *Cable Television
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 381 220 EM 011 397 AUTHOR Zraket, Charles A. TITLE Some Technical, Economic and Applications Considerations of Interactive Television. INSTITUTION Mitre Corr., McLean, Va. SPONS AGENCY National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. REPORT NO M-73-40 PUB DATE Mar 73 NOTE 62p.; Paper presented at the Seminar on the Promise of Cable and Satellite Communications EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS *Cable Television; Communication *Computers; Information Needs; Information F zieval; Information Storage; Information Systems; Interaction; *Man Machine systems; *Metropolitan Areas; State of the Art Reviews; *Telecommunication; Urban Areas IDENTIFIERS Broadband Communications; CATV; Wideband Cable ABSTRACT During the present decade cable television (CATV) systems will be franchised in most metropolitan areas of the nation. Previously, CATV has mainly transmitted over-the-air broadcast signals to small communities, but in the urban setting the capabilities of wideband cable (e.g., 30 channels per cable) can be expanded and applied to new communication needs. First, however, CATV must outgrow its identity as a retransmitter and become the medium for delivering a wide range of broadband communications services. Linked with computers, interactive cable systems can serve social, cultural, civic, education, governmental, business and commercial interests. The utility and importance of interactive CATV systems stem from the follcwing characteristics: 1) they are individualized and respond instantly, privately, and economically to the user's needs; 2) they are computerized, offering search and calculation capabilities otherwise not available; 3) they provide unlimited points of entry aLd delivery of information, in addition to controlled storage, access, and retrieval; and 4) they are multimedia, encompassing video, audio, graphics, pictures, and alphanumeric text, and offer the potential of a common carrier between people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eddie Awards Issue
    THE MAGAZINE FOR FILM & TELEVISION EDITORS, ASSISTANTS & POST- PRODUCTION PROFESSIONALS THE EDDIE AWARDS ISSUE IN THIS ISSUE Golden Eddie Honoree GUILLERMO DEL TORO Career Achievement Honorees JERROLD L. LUDWIG, ACE and CRAIG MCKAY, ACE PLUS ALL THE WINNERS... FEATURING DUMBO HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON: THE HIDDEN WORLD AND MUCH MORE! US $8.95 / Canada $8.95 QTR 1 / 2019 / VOL 69 Veteran editor Lisa Zeno Churgin switched to Adobe Premiere Pro CC to cut Why this pro chose to switch e Old Man & the Gun. See how Adobe tools were crucial to her work ow and to Premiere Pro. how integration with other Adobe apps like A er E ects CC helped post-production go o without a hitch. adobe.com/go/stories © 2019 Adobe. All rights reserved. Adobe, the Adobe logo, Adobe Premiere, and A er E ects are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Adobe in the United States and/or other countries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Veteran editor Lisa Zeno Churgin switched to Adobe Premiere Pro CC to cut Why this pro chose to switch e Old Man & the Gun. See how Adobe tools were crucial to her work ow and to Premiere Pro. how integration with other Adobe apps like A er E ects CC helped post-production go o without a hitch. adobe.com/go/stories © 2019 Adobe. All rights reserved. Adobe, the Adobe logo, Adobe Premiere, and A er E ects are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Adobe in the United States and/or other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Cincinnati Bell-Hawaiian Telcom Merger Receives Hawaii DCCA
    CINCINNATI BELL-HAWAIIAN TELCOM MERGER RECEIVES HAWAI‘I DCCA APPROVAL CINCINNATI and HONOLULU, December 8, 2017 – Today the Hawai‘i Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs’ (DCCA) Cable Television Division (CATV) announced the conditional approval of the transfer of control of Hawaiian Telcom’s cable franchise to Cincinnati Bell Inc. (NYSE: CBB). This development is an important step in the process of satisfying the closing conditions of Cincinnati Bell’s combination with Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. (NASDAQ: HCOM). Leigh Fox, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cincinnati Bell, said, “We are pleased that our merger approval process is moving forward expeditiously and thank the DCCA for their leadership. The DCCA’s approval is a significant step forward in the combination of Cincinnati Bell and Hawaiian Telcom, a merger that will accelerate our overarching strategy to create a diversified and balanced revenue mix by expanding our high-speed, high-bandwidth fiber optic network while building a complementary IT solutions and cloud services business in Cincinnati and Hawai‘i.” Scott K. Barber, President and Chief Executive Officer of Hawaiian Telcom, commented, “This approval moves us one step closer to creating a stronger, more successful communications and technology company focused on serving our local customers with industry-leading products and services. The combination will ensure the continued build out of our Next Generation Fiber Network, enabling expanded access to high-capacity broadband and TV service across Hawai‘i.” As outlined in the DCCA’s Decision & Order No. 370, which can be viewed at http://cca.hawaii.gov/catv, Cincinnati Bell has committed to: investing $20 million dollars to improve and build out Hawaiian Telcom’s Next Generation Fiber Network statewide within four years of the close of the merger; continuing local management of Hawaiian Telcom in Hawai‘i, and honoring its union labor agreements; and adhering to laws and rules regarding customer privacy as well as open Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloading of Movies, Television Shows and Other Video Programming, Some of Which Charge a Nominal Or No Fee for Access
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO Commission file number 001-32871 COMCAST CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) PENNSYLVANIA 27-0000798 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) One Comcast Center, Philadelphia, PA 19103-2838 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215) 286-1700 SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on which Registered Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value NASDAQ Global Select Market Class A Special Common Stock, $0.01 par value NASDAQ Global Select Market 2.0% Exchangeable Subordinated Debentures due 2029 New York Stock Exchange 5.50% Notes due 2029 New York Stock Exchange 6.625% Notes due 2056 New York Stock Exchange 7.00% Notes due 2055 New York Stock Exchange 8.375% Guaranteed Notes due 2013 New York Stock Exchange 9.455% Guaranteed Notes due 2022 New York Stock Exchange SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: NONE Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
    [Show full text]