DOCSLIB.ORG

How's the Water: 2015. Fecal Contamination in The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How's the Water: 2015. Fecal Contamination in The HOW’S THE WATER? 2015 Fecal Contamination in the Hudson River and its Tributaries Riverkeeper is a member-supported organization. Our mission is to protect the environmental, recreational and commercial integrity of the Hudson River and its tributaries, and to safeguard the drinking water of nine million New York City and Hudson Valley residents. 2 RIVERKEEPER HOW’S THE WATER? 2015 Fecal Contamination in the Hudson River and its Tributaries TABLE OF CONTENTS About This Report ........................................................... 4 Acknowledgments ........................................................... 5 Executive Summary .......................................................... 6 Sources of Contamination .................................................... 8 Riverkeeper’s Water Quality Studies ........................................... 12 How to Read Riverkeeper’s Data Charts ........................................ 13 Findings: ................................................................ 14–19 Hudson River Estuary .................................................... 14 Hudson River Estuary: Rain Analysis ....................................... 16 Hudson River Estuary: Regional Analysis .................................... 17 Tributaries: Regional Analysis ............................................. 18 Tributaries and NYC Shorelines: Rain Analysis .............................. 19 Maps and Data, Site by Site ............................................... 20-28 Hudson River Estuary .................................................... 20 Catskill Creek and Esopus Creek .......................................... 22 Rondout Creek and Wallkill River .......................................... 24 Sparkill Creek and Pocantico River ........................................ 26 New York City Area ...................................................... 28 Action Agenda .............................................................. 30 Success Stories ............................................................. 34 What You Can Do ........................................................... 36 Appendix: Waterborne Illnesses .............................................. 37 Endnotes ................................................................... 38 HOW’S THE WATER? 2015 3 ABOUT THIS REPORT 2014 Water Quality Program Data Use Policy John Lipscomb, Riverkeeper, director These water quality data are made freely available Dan Shapley, Riverkeeper, manager and author to the public, and we encourage their wide use. Jennifer Epstein, Riverkeeper, associate However, if you use the data for research, policy, or Dr. Gregory O’Mullan, CUNY Queens College, educational purposes, we ask for notification. Data science advisor should not be posted on any website, but links can Dr. Andrew Juhl, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory be made to riverkeeper.org. If the Riverkeeper data of Columbia University, science advisor are used as background or ancillary information for Carol Knudson, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory any presentation, publication, website, or educational of Columbia University, research assistant product, please cite its source. This report summarizes data gathered by different groups, and each set of data Questions? should be cited differently: Contact Dan Shapley at [email protected] or 914-478-4501 x226 • Hudson River Estuary data: “Data collected by O’Mullan GD, Juhl AR, and 2015 Report Lipscomb J, available at www.riverkeeper.org.” In addition to the Water Quality Program team, • Tributary community science data: assistance in preparing this report came from Paul “Data collected by Riverkeeper in partnership Gallay, Missy Falkenberg, Kara Matthews, Sean Dixon, with residents of the Hudson Valley, available at Chloe Heintz, Tara D’Andrea, John Mickelson and www.riverkeeper.org.” Kaitlyn Shaw. • New York City community science data: “Data collected by New York City Water Trail Design and layout: New Leaf Graphic Design Association and The River Project, in partnership with more than 20 community boathouses, Printing: Executive Printing, Elmsford, N.Y. community groups, and waterfront parks.” Paper: Enviro 100 paper, made from 100% post- Visit riverkeeper.org/water-quality for additional data, consumer waste including from samples gathered in 2015. Cover Photo Swimmers in the Hudson River at Croton Point, courtesy Toughman Triathlon. © Riverkeeper 2015 4 RIVERKEEPER ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ver nearly 10 years, many people and organizations have contributed to the funding, study design, data collection, data analysis, data presentation, and advocacy related to Riverkeeper’s Water Quality Program. OThese acknowledgements focus on those who contributed in 2014, but we wish to thank all who have assisted, including Tracy Brown, Director of Western Sound Programs for Save the Sound; Brian Brigham, research assistant at CUNY Queens College; and the data visualization team at NiJeL. 2014 Community Science Partners 2014 Funding Many groups and individuals have participated in the Austen-Stokes Ancient Americas Foundation, Chris community science projects described in this report. and Suzanne Augustin, City University of New York, While all individuals are not listed here, we thank Dale and Laura Kutnick, Dextra Baldwin McGonagle them all. Listed here are groups that have collected and Foundation, Double R Foundation, Eppley Foundation processed samples: for Research, HSBC Water Programme, Hudson River Foundation for Science and Environmental Research, • Catskill Creek Watershed Awareness Project Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia • Gardiner Environmental Conservation Commission University, John McLaughlin, Michele Hertz and • Montgomery Conservation Advisory Council Larry Friedman, The Nancy and Edwin Marks Family • New York City Water Trail Association and The Foundation, New England Interstate Water Pollution River Project, which partner with more than Control Commission (NEIWPCC), S. Mackintosh 20 community boathouses, community groups, Pulsifer, Mike Richter, Sun Hill Foundation, Wallace waterfront parks, and labs Research Foundation, and many Riverkeeper members. • Quassaick Creek Watershed Alliance (data available at riverkeeper.org) The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the • Rochester Environmental Conservation Commission views and policies of NEIWPCC or any other funder, • Rosendale Commission for Conservation of the nor does the mention of trade names or commercial Environment products constitute endorsement or recommendation • Sparkill Creek Watershed Alliance for use. • Wawarsing Environmental Conservation Commission Riverkeeper’s citizen sampling program is recognized by the Clinton Global Initiative as a Commitment to Action—a plan for addressing a significant global challenge. HOW’S THE WATER? 2015 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY It will take years to achieve the goal of making the Hudson River Estuary and its tributaries consistently safe for swimming. Let’s get to work. Kids leap into the tidal Rondout Creek in Kingston. Photo by John Lipscomb/Riverkeeper nvestments in clean water infrastructure over decades Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory; and in Hudson have dramatically improved water quality On many River tributaries and at New York City public water Idays, in many places throughout the Hudson River access points by dozens of community scientists. As Estuary, water quality is excellent for swimming. measured against the Environmental Protection Agency’s recommended Beach Action Value for safe swimming: In 2014, nearly 6,500 people swam in organized public swim events in the Hudson River Estuary and New • 23% of Hudson River estuary samples fail. York Harbor,1 and thousands more swam at public • 72% of Hudson River tributary samples fail. beaches or other water access points.2 • 48% of New York City-area water access point samples fail. While the people of the Hudson Valley have made much progress toward achieving the Clean Water Act After periods of dry weather, the Hudson River Estuary goal of making the watershed safe for swimming, we are is safe for swimming in many locations. But after rain, failing to adequately protect these waters—the public’s the water is more likely to be contaminated, especially beach. There is a documented immediate need for more in areas affected by combined sewer overflows and than 315 Hudson Valley and New York City wastewater streetwater runoff. 4 projects, at a cost of $5.9 billion.3 Rain also dramatically increases the degree of fecal This report demonstrates the cost of failing to make contamination in the tributaries we have sampled those investments, and of failing to adequately enforce with community science5 partners. The sources of this the Clean Water Act, particularly in the tributaries of contamination are likely complex, which points to the the Hudson. The information presented here is based on steep challenge of achieving improvements in water more than 6,000 water samples collected in the Hudson quality. Sources are known or suspected to include— River estuary by Riverkeeper, CUNY Queens and each to an unknown degree—nearly 1,000 permitted 6 RIVERKEEPER wastewater discharge outfalls,6 thousands of streetwater FINDINGS AT A GLANCE outfalls,7 hundreds of thousands of septic systems, 8 thousands of farms9 and countless wild animals. CONTAMINATION VARIES The Hudson River Valley has been a laboratory for At Hudson River Estuary sites sampled, the environmental movement since its inception, and contamination varies from location to location, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Painted Village DRI
    Village of Tannersville Downtown Revitalization Initiative The Painted Village DRI 2 n ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Village of Tannersville earned the unique brand of “The Painted Village in the Sky.” The Village of Tannersville thanks our extraordinary community - residents, business owners, nonprofit leaders and their many employees for creating a buzz and driving this application. To say their engagement is extraordinary is an understatement. They inspire us. Our special thanks to our project sponsors for their ongoing investment in our Painted Village, and to those who donated space for meetings, time for outreach and consulting, leadership through the Village Board and other groups. They had conversation after conversation with residents (at the Post Office, the grocery store, over lunch and just walking on Main Street). We appreciate the commitments made by the Town of Hunter, the Greene County Legislature, and Greene County Department of Economic Development, Tourism and Planning who stand ready to strengthen our capacity further and enable us to drive the $64.5M of leveraged projects through implementation. Finally, we would like to thank our long-time ally, the Hunter Foundation, for their unwavering leadership and partnership every day. Together we are an unbeatable team. Being designated to participate in the DRI process will transform the future for hundreds of people and dozens of organizations who serve thousands of New Yorkers every year. Basic Information ........................................... 1 The Mayor’s Message ..................................... 2 Vision for the Painted Village DRI. ................... 4 Justification .................................................... 6 Downtown Identification .............................. 15 CONTENTS 1. Boundaries Of Proposed DRI Area .......................... 15 2. Past Investment, Future Investment Potential ....... 20 OF 3.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Potential Hazardous Waste Site Preliminary Assessment
    '/ I FE8 >^3 1987 BUREAU OP MWAROOUS SffE CONTROL OWS«)« OF SOL>D AND HAZARDOUS WASTE EA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY A Division of EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. /I =5.^fia . « --- EA REPORT CHG61A PHASE I INVESTIGATION CATSKILL COAL GASIFICATION PLANT SITE TOWN OF CATSKILL GREENE COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation 284 South Avenue Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Prepared by EA Science and Technology R.D. 2, Goshen Turnpike Middletown, New York 10940 A Division of EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. January 1987 CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1 2. PURPOSE 2-1 3. SCOPE OF WORK 3-1 4. SITE ASSESSMENT 4-1 4.1 Site History 4-1 4.2 Site Topography 4-4 4.3 Site Hydrogeology 4-5 4.4 Site Contamination 4-6 5. PRELIMINARY APPLICATION OF THE HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM 5.1 Narrative Summary 5-1 5.2 Location 5.3 HRS Worksheets 5.4 HRS Documentation Records 5.5 EPA 2070-12 5.6 EPA 2070-13 6. ASSESSMENT OF DATA ADEQUACY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6-1 6.1 Adequacy of Existing Data 6-1 6.2 Recommendations 6-1 6.3 Phase II Work Plan 6-1 6.3.1 Task 1 Mobilization and Site Reconnaissance 6-1 6.3.2 Task 2 Preparation of Final Sampling Plan 6-2 6.3.3 Task 3 Soil Vapor Survey 6-3 6.3.4 Task 4 Test Borings and Observation Wells 6-4 6.3.5 Task 5 Sampling 6-5 6.3.6 Task 6 Contamination Assessment 6-6 6.3.7 Task 7 Remedial Cost Estimate 6-6 6.3.8 Task 8 Final Phase II Report 6-6 6.3.9 Task 9 Project Management/Quality Assurance 6-7 APPENDIX 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Report: 13% of Hudson Valley Bridges in Poor Condition
    Report: 13% of Hudson Valley bridges in poor condition FRONT PAGE lower-weight vehicles, that can have an impact on everyone from emergency responders to school buses, commercial vehicles and farm equipment, who will all need to make longer trips to get The Mill Street bridge, over Quassaick Creek in where they need to Newburgh/New Windsor, is the second-worst go. ranked bridge among the 25 cited in the Hudson Valley as poor/structurally deficient [KEELY “Good MARSH/FOR THE TIMES HERALD-RECORD] infrastructure is also the cornerstone of By Michael Randall bringing in good Times Herald-Record jobs,” said Mike GOSHEN – A new report from a nonprofit group Oates, president that researches and evaluates the conditions of and CEO of Hudson the roads we travel on says 13 percent of the Valley Economic Hudson Valley’s bridges are in poor, structurally Development deficient condition. Corporation. “I hope Another 64 percent are in fair condition, while this (report) leads to only 23 percent are in good condition. action, so we’re not At a news conference Tuesday at the Orange at a competitive County Chamber of Commerce office, Carolyn disadvantage with Bonifas Kelly, associate director of research for other states.” the nonprofit, The Road Information Project New York ranks (TRIP), said those structurally deficient bridges 12th among the 50 6. Pine Hill Road over the Thruway, Woodbury carry almost 2.6 million vehicles per day. states, with 10 percent of its bridges in poor or 12. South Street over Wawayanda Creek, Warwick Her study included 2,551 bridges in Orange, structurally deficient condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfowl Count 2020
    New York State January Waterfowl Count Report – 2020 The Ulster County segment of the annual NYSOA New York State January Waterfowl Count was conducted on January 18, 2020. Twenty participants in eight field parties encountered a remarkable 21 species and 10,012 individual waterfowl, surpassing our previous high count of 17 species recorded in 2016, 2013, and 2008. Our ten-year average for this countywide effort is 11.8 species and 6,225 individuals. Typical for this annual mid-winter survey, two species accounted for 94% of our total abundance, Canada Goose (82%) and Mallard (12%). A total of 16 Bald Eagles (9 adults and 7 sub- adults) were observed during the course of the waterfowl count. Extensive open water, exposed fields, and extremely mild air temperatures less than a week prior to the count encouraged a noticeable movement of waterfowl into the mid-Hudson River region, with air temperatures reaching the upper 60’s (F) on two consecutive days over the previous weekend. Cold arctic air eventually moved into our area mid-week and remained in place, freezing smaller and slower- moving bodies of water. This sudden change induced some waterfowl to congregate in significant areas of open water on creeks, rivers, and reservoirs, and an exceptionally good diversity of waterfowl remained in the county for count day. The highlight of this year’s survey was principally the magnitude of diversity encountered on a waterfowl count that typically tallies in the low teens. Although there was no particular outstanding species this year, Hooded Mergansers were found in record high numbers (35), surpassing our previous high count of 20, more than four times our ten-year average of 8.2/year.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan
    NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Waterfowl Count Report
    New York State Waterfowl Count – 2008 January 12, 2008 Ulster County Narrative Page 1 of 8 Sixteen observers in five field parties participated in the Ulster County segment of the annual New York State Winter Waterfowl Count, recording a total of 17 species and 6,890 individuals within the county on Saturday, 12 January 2008. This represents a record high species count, exceeding last year's diversity by three species, and is just 204 individuals short of our record high total set in 2006. Field observers noted fast moving water, and essentially frozen ponds, lakes, and marshes throughout the county. Stone Ridge Pond on Mill Dam Road was the exception, and continues to contribute a large number of individuals and a few unusual species to the composite, hosting American Wigeon, Ring-necked Duck, and 1,061 individuals this year. The Hudson River, Ashokan Reservoir, lower Esopus Creek in Saugerties, and agricultural fields surrounding Wallkill prison accounted for the majority of the balance of the count. Weather conditions were quite favorable for this time of the year, especially in comparison to the rain and wide- spread fog of last year, or the sub-freezing temperatures typical of a mid-January count. A very dense fog did persist over the Hudson River early morning, requiring some minor route changes to allow for early visits to inland sites while delaying surveys of the Hudson to later in the day. Temperatures started out just below freezing, then warmed to a very comfortable mid-40's (F) by afternoon. Winds were calm for the most part, with the exception of a cold NW gale sweeping across partially frozen Ashokan Reservoir, making for very choppy waters in the lower basin and difficult viewing conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • NYC Park Crime Stats
    1st QTRPARK CRIME REPORT SEVEN MAJOR COMPLAINTS Report covering the period Between Jan 1, 2018 and Mar 31, 2018 GRAND LARCENY OF PARK BOROUGH SIZE (ACRES) CATEGORY Murder RAPE ROBBERY FELONY ASSAULT BURGLARY GRAND LARCENY TOTAL MOTOR VEHICLE PELHAM BAY PARK BRONX 2771.75 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 VAN CORTLANDT PARK BRONX 1146.43 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 01000 01 ROCKAWAY BEACH AND BOARDWALK QUEENS 1072.56 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00001 01 FRESHKILLS PARK STATEN ISLAND 913.32 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK QUEENS 897.69 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 01002 03 LATOURETTE PARK & GOLF COURSE STATEN ISLAND 843.97 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 MARINE PARK BROOKLYN 798.00 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 BELT PARKWAY/SHORE PARKWAY BROOKLYN/QUEENS 760.43 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 BRONX PARK BRONX 718.37 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 01000 01 FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT BOARDWALK AND BEACH STATEN ISLAND 644.35 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00001 01 ALLEY POND PARK QUEENS 635.51 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 PROSPECT PARK BROOKLYN 526.25 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 04000 04 FOREST PARK QUEENS 506.86 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 GRAND CENTRAL PARKWAY QUEENS 460.16 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 FERRY POINT PARK BRONX 413.80 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 CONEY ISLAND BEACH & BOARDWALK BROOKLYN 399.20 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00001 01 CUNNINGHAM PARK QUEENS 358.00 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00001 01 RICHMOND PARKWAY STATEN ISLAND 350.98 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 CROSS ISLAND PARKWAY QUEENS 326.90 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 GREAT KILLS PARK STATEN ISLAND 315.09 ONE ACRE
    [Show full text]
  • NYC Bars by Price & Rating
    LIST, MAPS, AND CHARTS OF NEW YORK CITY AREA BARS BY PRICE, HAPPY HOURS, AND RATINGS. BY MAX WOOLF (@MINIMAXIR — MINIMAXIR.COM) • Bar data was retrieved from Foursquare • Table is sorted by Price, then by Happy using a couple Python scripts. Hour, then by Rating. • Charts and maps were made using R • You are free to use this data as you and ggplot2. please as long as you cite it. Some bars may be missing due to Foursquare API limitations. Name Price Happy Hour? Rating Category The Blind Tiger $ Yes 9.6 Bar Website Foursquare Drop Off Service $ Yes 9.53 Bar Foursquare Pete's Candy Store $ Yes 9.49 Bar Foursquare High Dive $ Yes 9.46 Bar Foursquare Ace Bar $ Yes 9.43 Bar Website Foursquare The Levee $ Yes 9.42 Dive Bar Foursquare Harefield Road $ Yes 9.38 Bar Foursquare 169 Bar $ Yes 9.36 Bar Foursquare The Owl Farm $ Yes 9.36 Bar Website Foursquare Brooklyn Ice House $ Yes 9.34 Dive Bar Foursquare DTUT $ Yes 9.32 Coffee Shop Website Foursquare Crocodile Lounge $ Yes 9.32 Bar Website Foursquare Botanica Bar $ Yes 9.32 Dive Bar Foursquare Skinny Dennis $ Yes 9.32 Bar Foursquare The Cobra Club $ Yes 9.32 Bar Website Foursquare Pacific Standard $ Yes 9.31 Bar Website Foursquare Soda Bar $ Yes 9.31 Bar Foursquare Barcade $ Yes 9.3 Bar Website Foursquare Otto's Shrunken Head $ Yes 9.28 Bar Website Foursquare Floyd NY $ Yes 9.27 Bar Website Foursquare Croxley's Ale House $ Yes 9.26 Sports Bar Website Foursquare Zombie Hut $ Yes 9.26 Bar Foursquare Night of Joy $ Yes 9.24 Bar Website Foursquare Barracuda Bar $ Yes 9.22 Gay Bar Website Foursquare
    [Show full text]
  • Suitors Line Aisles of Food Emporium
    20120917-NEWS--0001-NAT-CCI-CN_-- 9/14/2012 7:55 PM Page 1 FRUIT FLY HE TRAVELED THE GLOBE FOR THE BEST PICKINGS CRAIN’S® PAGE 8 NEW YORK BUSINESS VOL. XXVIII, NO. 38 WWW.CRAINSNEWYORK.COM SEPTEMBER 17-23, 2012 PRICE: $3.00 Suitors line aisles of Food Emporium The sale of A&P’s ‘crown jewel’ may be as much about real estate as arugula BY LISA FICKENSCHER For the second time in two years, the Food Emporium chain of supermar- kets,owned by the Great Atlantic & Pa- cific Tea Co.,is on the block—and there is no shortage of interested buyers. The 17-store chain controls attrac- tive real estate in Manhattan at a time ADVISE AND when many grocers—including Fair- CONTEMPT: David Lichtenstein insists way Market, Balducci’s, Trader Joe’s in a lawsuit he was ill and Whole Foods, served by his lawyers as well as discount SALE! and bankers. clothing retailers and drugstores— are expanding. 16 But there are FOOD EMPORIUMS several suitors who in Manhattan were stand out: Chris- put on the block by tian Haub, former Montvale, N.J.- chairman,chief ex- based A&P ecutive and major shareholder of the Montvale, N.J.- AVERAGE$250K WEEKLY based company revenue per store, known as A&P, according to ‘The mark’ and Gristedes industry experts owner John Catsi- matidis, who said he was close to ac- Three years after his $8B bet on Extended Stay landed the chain quiring Food Emporium in 2010, shortly before its parent filed for bank- in bankruptcy, David Lichtenstein wants his reputation back ruptcy protection and called off the sale.
    [Show full text]
  • Catskill Mountain Region July 2012
    Catskill Mountain Region July 2012 GUIDEwww.catskillregionguide.com CATSKILL MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION 2012 Annual Benefit PLEASE JOIN US! Name a Seat at the Orpheum! $500 per seat. Select your seat on July 14 at the Benefit, or call Toni at 518 263 2001Saturday, July 14, 6 pm Orpheum Performing Arts Center Main Street, Tannersville, NY Featuring a showcase performance by The Cherylyn Lavagnino Dance Company, in collaboration with Kenneth Hamrick, Artistic Director, Piano Performance Museum. Visit www.catskillmtn.org or call Toni Perretti at 518 263 2001 for more information and to purchase tickets. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE www.catskillregionguide.com VOLUME 27, NUMBER 7 July 2012 PUBLISHERS Peter Finn, Chairman, Catskill Mountain Foundation Sarah Finn, President, Catskill Mountain Foundation EDITORIAL DIRECTOR, CATSKILL MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION Sarah Taft ADVERTISING SALES Rita Adami Steve Friedman CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Tara Collins, Kenneth Hamrick, Jeff Senterman, Alix Hallman Travis, Carol and David White ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE Candy McKee Toni Perretti Laureen Priputen PRINTING Catskill Mountain Printing DISTRIBUTION Catskill Mountain Foundation On the cover: Violinist Mark Huggins will perform on Saturday, August 4 at the Doctorow Center for the Arts in Hunter. For more information about this performance, see page 18. EDITORIAL DEADLINE FOR NEXT ISSUE: July 6 The Catskill Mountain Region Guide is published 12 times a year 2 HIDDEN STUDIOS OPEN DOORS: by the Catskill Mountain Foundation, Inc., Main Street, PO Box 924, Hunter, NY 12442. If you have events or programs that you Andes, Roxbury, Margaretville would like to have covered, please send them by e-mail to tafts@ catskillmtn.org. Please be sure to furnish a contact name and in- Open Studios Tour 2012 By Alix Hallman Travis clude your address, telephone, fax, and e-mail information on all correspondence.
    [Show full text]
  • Bobcats in Westchester County
    Michael Rubbo, Ph.D. Department of Environmental Studies and Science Pace University 50 mi N of NYC Population of ~ 1 million . 44th most populated county in US 450 mi2 . 290,000 acres Significant open space . Over 100,ooo acres ▪ ~50% forested Approximately 9,500 acres Located in: . Towns of Ossining, Mount Pleasant, New Castle . Villages of Briarcliff Manor, Sleepy Hollow, Pleasantville Pocantico River originates in Echo Lake and ends at Hudson River . Flows north to south . Approximately 9.5 miles in length Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Public . Rockefeller Park and Preserve – Over 1,700 acres . Hardscrabble Wilderness Area - ~250 acres . Pocantico Lake County Park - ~165 acres Private – open to the public . Stone Barns Center for Food and Agriculture Private . Edith Macy Conference Center - ~400 acres . Campfire Club - ~225 acres Identify unique ecological attributes or areas that are impaired . Will direct preservation/restoration efforts . Serve as basis for watershed management plan First step is to locate resources . Habitats are a good representation of overall biological resources Collected common data layers: . Roads . Municipal tax parcels . Topographic contours . Bedrock geology . Surficial geology . Soils . Hydrography . DEC streams . FEMA floodplains . Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) wetlands . National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) wetlands . NY Natural Heritage Program (NYNHP) data . Agricultural land Standard hydrography and wetlands data sets Also used soil properties for wetlands . Used soils classes of: ▪ Somewhat Poorly Drained ▪ Poorly Drained ▪ Very Poorly Drained Crest, Ledge, and Talus .
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial and Viral Source Tracking in the Pocantico and Sparkill Creek Watersheds
    NEW YORK STATE WATER RESOURCES INSTITUTE Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering 230 Riley-Robb Hall, Cornell University Tel: (607) 254-7163 Ithaca, NY 14853-5701 Fax: (607) 255-4449 http://wri.cals.cornell.edu Email: [email protected] Bacterial and Viral Source Tracking in the Pocantico and Sparkill Creek Watersheds Bernadette J. Connors, PhD Dominican College Science Department [email protected] Abstract In New York State, 792 waterbodies are on the “Impaired/TMDL” list, which identifies bodies of water that might require remediation. The Sparkill Creek, placed on the list first in 2010, empties into the Hudson River. It faces issues with stormwater runoff, causing elevated levels of pathogens in the creek and decreased oxygen availability. According to published data, the levels of the indicator bacteria are 24 times higher than EPA standards. The Pocantico River, located in Westchester County, faces many of these same issues. Both were tested for microbial and coliphage loads and diversity as related to weather events. Coliform and E. coli levels were measured, with a significant increase found with a rainfall event for both sampling locations. The coliphage numbers and diversity were also significantly different with a rain event. Microbial community analyses were also completed. Of note was increased prevalence of Enterobacter and Escherichia three miles from the mouth of the creek. Future studies include a more thorough analysis of the microbial community data in both time and space, along with further testing of the fungal, bacterial, and algal populations. Bacterial and Viral Source Tracking in the Pocantico and Sparkill Creek Watersheds Three Summary Points of Interest • Microbial community profiling yields a more comprehensive view of challenges faced by aquatic ecosystems.
    [Show full text]