DOCSLIB.ORG

Landslides and Related Mass Wasting Features in the Yakima River Corridor Field Trip

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Landslides and Related Mass Wasting Features in the Yakima River Corridor Field Trip Ellensburg Chapter, Ice Age Floods Institute Landslides and Related Mass Wasting Features in the Yakima River Corridor Field Trip Karl Lillquist Geography Department Central Washington University 1 April 2018 Field Trip Overview Field Trip Description: Central Washington includes a variety of landslides and related “mass wasting” features. Why? What causes these? How active are they? What have they impacted? On this trip, we will explore the evidence of various types of mass wasting along the Yakima River corridor from east of Cle Elum to south of Union Gap. Examples will include landslides, debris flows, rockfall, dry ravel, and creep. Along the way, we will develop a sense of what indicates past mass wasting, what caused it, what are its implications on the surroundings, and where it might occur again in the future. Our stops will range from ancient landslides to recent debris flows to the currently active Rattlesnake slide. Tentative Schedule: 10:00am Depart CWU 10:30 Stop 1— Lambert Road, East of Cle Elum 11:15pm Depart 11:45 Stop 2—Near MP 101, WA 10, North of Thorp 12:45 Depart 1:30 Stop 3—MP 20, WA 821, Yakima River Canyon 2:30 Depart 3:00 Stop 4—Between MP 3 and 4, WA 821, Yakima River Canyon 3:45 Depart 4:15 Stop 5—North of MP 74, US 97, South of Union Gap 5:00 Depart 6:00 Arrive at CWU 2 Our Route & Stops 1 2 3 4 5 Figure 1. General route map of field trip. Source: Google Maps. 3 Ellensburg to Lambert Road Route. From Ellensburg, head west on I-90 toward Cle Elum. Take Exit 85 (the first Cle Elum exit when westbound). At the yield sign on the off ramp, turn right onto WA 970 toward Wenatchee. Follow this approximately 3 miles east just past the junction of WA 970 and WA 10. Turn right (east) onto Lambert Road and follow this to its crossing of the Teanaway River. East of the bridge, pull off to the right side of Lambert Road and park. Please do not park on the bridge! This is Stop 1. Kittitas Basin geology. Our drive from Ellensburg begins on the floor of the Kittitas Basin syncline with downfolded Columbia River Basalts ~4000 feet below us (Figures 2, 3, & 4). Mantling the Columbia River Basalts are volcanic lahar sediments of the Ellensburg Formation, alluvial fan sediments from streams exiting the surrounding mountains, and windblown loess (Waitt, 1979; Tabor and others, 1982). Mass wasting at 70 mph. Just west of Thorp, look north and see a steep escarpment in the Ellensburg Formation and overlying alluvial Thorp Gravels. At the toe of this escarpment, you will a “hummocky” surface. This escarpment and the hummocky deposits represent huge, mostly ancient landslides. We will discuss these landslides enroute to Stop 2. Past glaciers. West of Thorp, we ascend from the Kittitas Basin onto Elk Heights (or “Thorp Prairie”). This surface consists of Columbia River Basalts overlain by older glacial end moraine and more recent loess. The end moraine mantling Thorp Prairie represents the farthest downvalley extent of the Upper Yakima River Watershed glaciers during the Kittitas-Swauk Prairie glaciation (Porter, 1976; Waitt, 1979) (Figure 5). These are also apparently the farthest downvalley extents of any glaciers in the Upper Yakima River Watershed. Thorp Prairie moraines are thought to be the same age as those of Swauk Prairie to the north (Figures 5 & 7). Therefore, the Kittitas-age glacier that deposited these features had split into two lobes near its terminus because of prominent Lookout Mountain. The glacier that deposited these moraines formed from coalescence of the Cle Elum, Kachess, and Keechelus valley glaciers (Figure 8). At its maximum extent, >500,000 years before present, this glacier was >40 miles long (Swanson and Porter, 1997). Kittitas Basin climate. The wind towers of the Kittitas Valley Wind Farm remind us of the regularity and strength of winds in the Kittitas Basin. The thick, fine textured deposits of loess that blanket the Thorp Prairie area are a reminder of the importance of wind over time as well. 4 Ellensburg to Lambert Road Figure 2. Location Naneum Manastash of Kittitas Basin Ridge Ridge syncline between Kittitas Naneum Ridge Valley and Manastash Ridge anticlines. Source: Jack Powell. 1 Figure 3. The Columbia Plateau and the spatial extent of the Columbia River Basalt Group, the four major structural-tectonic subprovinces (the Yakima Fold Belt, Palouse, Blue Mountains, and Clearwater-Weiser embayments), the Pasco Basin, the Olympic-Wallowa lineament. Number 1 indicates approximate location of Stop 1. Source: Reidel & Campbell (1989, p. 281). 5 Ellensburg to Lambert Road 1 Figure 4. Generalized map of major faults and folds along the western margin of the Columbia Plateau and Yakima Fold Belt. Bold number 1 indicates approximate location of Stop 1. Source: Reidel & Campbell (1989, p. 281). 6 Ellensburg to Lambert Road Lambert to Ellensburg 1 7 Figure 5. Glacial-geologic map of the Upper Yakima River drainage basin. Bold number 1 indicates approximate location of Stop 1. Source: Porter (1976, p. 62). Stop 1—Lambert Road Location. We are located on the floodplain of the Teanaway River near its junction with the Yakima River. Lookout Mountain to our east represents the westernmost extent of Columbia River Basalts in the area. Mass wasting. Mass wasting includes all types of gravity-driven slope movements including: - slide - flow - creep - fall - dry ravel Often these movements may occur together in the same area. Central Washington’s Yakima River corridor is characterized by all of these forms of mass wasting Our focus at Stop 1 is on slides and falls. Landslides & their evidence. Landslides are just that—sliding masses of land that may also include surficial features such as trees and various human structures. Evidence for landslides includes: - tilted features—land, trees, fences, etc. - escarpments (often arcuate & vegetation free) - tension cracks - displaced blocks (often as steps on slope) - hummocky terrain - ponds/wetlands - sharp bends in roads & streams - fan-shaped deposits - pressure ridges - deranged drainage patterns Which of those pieces of evidence do you see here? Types of landslides. Two varieties of landslides exist—translational (like a sled on hill) and rotational (like sliding or slumping down in a chair or couch). For this reason, rotational slides are also referred to as slumps. The recent Oso Landslide that resulted in the deaths of 44 Stillaguamish River residents was a rotational slide with a flow at the toe. Translational and rotational slides occur on steep slopes. Translational slides typically follow geological structures such as layers of bedrock or sediment. Rotational slides typically cut across bedding. The easiest way to differentiate the two is based on the presence or absence of of backtilted blocks in the upper portions of the slide—i.e, if present, the feature is a rotational slide (Figure 6). 8 Stop 1—Lambert Road Figure 6. Model of a rotational slide. Source: Highland and Bobrowsky, 2008, p. 5) Lookout Mountain rotational landslide and rockfall. The Lookout Mountain landslide was first recognized by Russell (1900) and Smith (1904). It is a large, rotational landslide that occurred in prehistoric times. Evidence for this rotational slide includes: 1) the prominent escarpment (i.e., main scarp) high on Lookout Mountain; 2) the large, backtilted blocks and associated minor scarps and ponds just downslope of the escarpment; and 3) the hummocky toe that extends to the Teanaway River near here (Figures 8, 9, & 10). At least four ponds are impounded within the large slide blocks. Subsequent rockfall occurred from the near vertical, bare, basalt face of the main scarp. Age. How old is the feature? First, we don’t know if the slide occurred all at once or piecemeal over time. Second, we can only address its age in a relative sense. Smith (1904) recognized a river terrace atop the middle portion of the slide. Waitt (in Tabor and others, 1982) attributes that terrace to the Swauk Prairie-age glacial outwash deposits. Recall that Swanson and Porter (1997) estimate that Swauk Prairie deposits are >500,000 years old so this slide is potentially more than one-half million years old! This is hard to believe given that the feature is so well-preserved. Perhaps this preservation is due to the semiarid climate and the hard basalts so little degradation has occurred over time. 9 Stop 1—Lambert Road Figure 7. Middle Pleistocene glacial features in the vicinity of Lookout Mountain, Upper Yakima River 1 Watershed. Bold number 1 indicates field trip stop. Source: Porter (1965, p. 37). Figure 8. Geologic map of Stop 1 and vicinity. Bold number 1 1 indicates field trip stop location. Purple = Columbia River Basalt, pale yellow with arrows = landslides, and bright yellow = alluvium. From Tabor & others (1982) 10 Stop 1 Stop Sag Ponds — Hummocky Road Lambert Terrain 1 Main scarp Figure 9. Lookout Mountain rotational landslide enclosed within red lines. Large arrows indicate landslide movement direction. Number indicates field trip stop. Source: Google Maps. 11 Stop 1—Lambert Road Slide Hummocky Teanaway Blocks Terrain River Main Scarp 1 Figure 10. Oblique view of Lookout Mountain landslide. Red lines outline extent of landslide. Heavy red arrows indicates rotational nature of slide and direction of movement. Bold number 1 is field trip stop. View toward north. Source: Google Earth. Causes. What caused this rotational slide? Weak interbeds between the Columbia River Basalts likely played a role as did a wetter climate. Perhaps a large earthquake triggered such a large slide. Waitt (in Tabor and others, 1982) speculates that a large lake impounded in the lower Teanaway River Valley by glaciers or moraines may have saturated substrates causing the failure of this slope.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report
    RECONNAISSANCE SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING OF THE LATE CENOZOIC SEDIMENTS OF THE COLUMBIA BASIN, WASHINGTON by James G. Rigby and Kurt Othberg with contributions from Newell Campbell Larry Hanson Eugene Kiver Dale Stradling Gary Webster Open File Report 79-3 September 1979 State of Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Olympia, Washington CONTENTS Introduction Objectives Study Area Regional Setting 1 Mapping Procedure 4 Sample Collection 8 Description of Map Units 8 Pre-Miocene Rocks 8 Columbia River Basalt, Yakima Basalt Subgroup 9 Ellensburg Formation 9 Gravels of the Ancestral Columbia River 13 Ringold Formation 15 Thorp Gravel 17 Gravel of Terrace Remnants 19 Tieton Andesite 23 Palouse Formation and Other Loess Deposits 23 Glacial Deposits 25 Catastrophic Flood Deposits 28 Background and previous work 30 Description and interpretation of flood deposits 35 Distinctive geomorphic features 38 Terraces and other features of undetermined origin 40 Post-Pleistocene Deposits 43 Landslide Deposits 44 Alluvium 45 Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Older Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Colluvium 46 Sand Dunes 46 Mirna Mounds and Other Periglacial(?) Patterned Ground 47 Structural Geology 48 Southwest Quadrant 48 Toppenish Ridge 49 Ah tanum Ridge 52 Horse Heaven Hills 52 East Selah Fault 53 Northern Saddle Mountains and Smyrna Bench 54 Selah Butte Area 57 Miscellaneous Areas 58 Northwest Quadrant 58 Kittitas Valley 58 Beebe Terrace Disturbance 59 Winesap Lineament 60 Northeast Quadrant 60 Southeast Quadrant 61 Recommendations 62 Stratigraphy 62 Structure 63 Summary 64 References Cited 66 Appendix A - Tephrochronology and identification of collected datable materials 82 Appendix B - Description of field mapping units 88 Northeast Quadrant 89 Northwest Quadrant 90 Southwest Quadrant 91 Southeast Quadrant 92 ii ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodically Spaced Anticlines of the Columbia Plateau
    Geological Society of America Special Paper 239 1989 Periodically spaced anticlines of the Columbia Plateau Thomas R. Watters Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. 20560 ABSTRACT Deformation of the continental flood-basalt in the westernmost portion of the Columbia Plateau has resulted in regularly spaced anticlinal ridges. The periodic nature of the anticlines is characterized by dividing the Yakima fold belt into three domains on the basis of spacings and orientations: (1) the northern domain, made up of the eastern segments of Umtanum Ridge, the Saddle Mountains, and the Frenchman Hills; (2) the central domain, made up of segments of Rattlesnake Ridge, the eastern segments of Horse Heaven Hills, Yakima Ridge, the western segments of Umtanum Ridge, Cleman Mountain, Bethel Ridge, and Manastash Ridge; and (3) the southern domain, made up of Gordon Ridge, the Columbia Hills, the western segment of Horse Heaven Hills, Toppenish Ridge, and Ahtanum Ridge. The northern, central, and southern domains have mean spacings of 19.6,11.6, and 27.6 km, respectively, with a total range of 4 to 36 km and a mean of 20.4 km (n = 203). The basalts are modeled as a multilayer of thin linear elastic plates with frictionless contacts, resting on a mechanically weak elastic substrate of finite thickness, that has buckled at a critical wavelength of folding. Free slip between layers is assumed, based on the presence of thin sedimentary interbeds in the Grande Ronde Basalt separating groups of flows with an average thickness of roughly 280 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field, Main Central Segment, Yakama Nation, Washington by Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein
    Prepared in Cooperation with the Water Resources Program of the Yakama Nation Geologic Map of the Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field, Main Central Segment, Yakama Nation, Washington By Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3315 Photograph showing Mount Adams andesitic stratovolcano and Signal Peak mafic shield volcano viewed westward from near Mill Creek Guard Station. Low-relief rocky meadows and modest forested ridges marked by scattered cinder cones and shields are common landforms in Simcoe Mountains volcanic field. Mount Adams (elevation: 12,276 ft; 3,742 m) is centered 50 km west and 2.8 km higher than foreground meadow (elevation: 2,950 ft.; 900 m); its eruptions began ~520 ka, its upper cone was built in late Pleistocene, and several eruptions have taken place in the Holocene. Signal Peak (elevation: 5,100 ft; 1,555 m), 20 km west of camera, is one of largest and highest eruptive centers in Simcoe Mountains volcanic field; short-lived shield, built around 3.7 Ma, is seven times older than Mount Adams. 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introductory Overview for Non-Geologists ...............................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Physiography, Environment, Boundary Surveys, and Access ......................................................6 Previous Geologic
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Conceptual Geologic Model
    Newberry Geothermal Energy Establishment of the Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) at Newberry Volcano, Oregon Appendix A Conceptual Geologic Model April 27, 2016 Contents A.1 Summary ........................................................................................................................................... A.1 A.2 Geological and Geophysical Context of the Western Flank of Newberry Volcano ......................... A.2 A.2.1 Data Sources ...................................................................................................................... A.2 A.2.2 Geography .......................................................................................................................... A.3 A.2.3 Regional Setting ................................................................................................................. A.4 A.2.4 Regional Stress Orientation .............................................................................................. A.10 A.2.5 Faulting Expressions ........................................................................................................ A.11 A.2.6 Geomorphology ............................................................................................................... A.12 A.2.7 Regional Hydrology ......................................................................................................... A.20 A.2.8 Natural Seismicity ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Artifacts of the Columbia River Priest
    IINNDDIIAANN AARRTTIIFFAACCTTSS OOFF TTHHEE CCOOLLUUMMBBIIAA RRIIVVEERR PPRRIIEESSTT RRAAPPIIDDSS TTOO TTHHEE CCOOLLUUMMBBIIAA RRIIVVEERR GGOORRGGEE IIIDDDEEENNNTTTIIIFFFIIICCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN GGGUUUIIIDDDEEE VVVOOOLLLUUUMMMEEE 111 DDDaaavvviiiddd HHHeeeaaattthhh Copyright 2003 All rights reserved. This publication may only be reproduced for personal and educational use. SSSCCCOOOPPPEEE This document is used to define projectile point typologies common to the Columbia Plateau, covering the region from Priest Rapids to the Columbia Gorge. When employed, recognition of a specified typology is understood as define within the body of this document. This document does not intend to cover, describe or define all typologies found within the region. This document will present several recognized typologies from the region. In several cases, a typology may extend beyond the Columbia Plateau region. Definitions are based upon research and records derived from consultation with; and information obtained from collectors and authorities. They are subject to revision as further experience and investigation may show is necessary or desirable. This document is authorized for distribution in an electronic format through selected organizations. This document is free for personal and educational use. RRREEECCCOOOGGGNNNIIITTTIIIOOONNN A special thanks for contributions given to: Ben Stermer - Technical Contributions Bill Jackson - Technical Contributions Joel Castanza - Images Mark Berreth - Images, Technical Contributions Randy McNeice - Images Rodney Michel
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit Yakima River Basin Critical Habitat Unit
    Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification: Rationale for Why Habitat is Essential, and Documentation of Occupancy Chapter 11. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit Yakima River Basin Critical Habitat Unit 353 Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification Chapter 11 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service September 2010 Chapter 11. Yakima River Basin Critical Habitat Unit The Yakima River CHU supports adfluvial, fluvial, and resident life history forms of bull trout. This CHU includes the mainstem Yakima River and tributaries from its confluence with the Columbia River upstream from the mouth of the Columbia River upstream to its headwaters at the crest of the Cascade Range. The Yakima River CHU is located on the eastern slopes of the Cascade Range in south-central Washington and encompasses the entire Yakima River basin located between the Klickitat and Wenatchee Basins. The Yakima River basin is one of the largest basins in the state of Washington; it drains southeast into the Columbia River near the town of Richland, Washington. The basin occupies most of Yakima and Kittitas Counties, about half of Benton County, and a small portion of Klickitat County. This CHU does not contain any subunits because it supports one core area. A total of 1,177.2 km (731.5 mi) of stream habitat and 6,285.2 ha (15,531.0 ac) of lake and reservoir surface area in this CHU are proposed as critical habitat. One of the largest populations of bull trout (South Fork Tieton River population) in central Washington is located above the Tieton Dam and supports the core area.
    [Show full text]
  • Suggested Fishing Destinations in Central Washington the Yakima
    Suggested Fishing Destinations in Central Washington Always refer to the WDFW Fishing Regulation Pamphlet prior to fishing any of these streams. Most of these are within an easy drive of Red’s Fly Shop, or even a day trip from the Puget Sound area. The east slopes of the Cascades are regarded as the best small stream fishing in Washington State and a GREAT place to start as a beginner! Most of the fisheries here offer small trout in abundance, which is great adventure and perfect for learning the art of fly fishing. The Yakima River Canyon The Canyon near Red’s Fly Shop is best wade fished when the river flows are below 2,500 cfs. September and October are the best months for wading, but February and March can offer great bank access as well. Spring and summer are more challenging but still possible. Yakima County Naches River – Trout tend to be most abundant upstream from the Tieton River junction. The best wade fishing season is July – October Tieton River – It runs fairly dirty in June, but July – mid August is excellent. Rattlesnake Creek – This is a great hike in adventure and offers wonderful small stream Cutthroat fishing for anyone willing to get off the beaten path. Little Naches River – Easy access off of USFS Road 19, July – October is the best time. American River/Bumping Rivers – These are in the headwaters of the Naches drainage. Be sure to read the WDFW Regulations if you fish the American River. Ahtanum Creek – Great small stream fishing. June – October Wenas Creek – Small water, small fish, but a great adventure.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Ellensburg Parks & Recreation System Comprehensive Plan Update
    City of Ellensburg CITY OF ELLENSBURG PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 1 City of Ellensburg Parks & Recreation System Comprehensive Plan Update 2016 City of Ellensburg PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 2016 Page 2 City of Ellensburg Parks & Recreation System Comprehensive Plan Update 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 3 City of Ellensburg Parks & Recreation System Comprehensive Plan Update 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Mayor Rich Elliott City Manager John Akers City Council Jill Scheffer1 Chris Herion Nancy Lillquist David Miller Mary Morgan Bruce Tabb Parks and Recreation Department Brad Case, Director Jodi Hoctor, Supervisor Aquatic and Recreation Diane Starkweather, Department Secretary Dennis Roberts, Coordinator Ellensburg Racquet & Recreation Center (ERRC) Katrina Douglas, Coordinator Adult Activity Center of Ellensburg (AAC) David Hurn Coordinator Youth Programs & Stan Bassett Youth Center (SBYC) Doug Demory, Parks Forman Parks and Recreation Commission Members Joe Sheeran-Chair…………. Term expires: May 31, 2017 Phyllis (PJ) MacPhaiden… Term expires May 31, 2017 Dolores Gonzalez…………. Term expires: May 31, 2018 Jack Frost…………………….. Term expires: May 31, 2018 Michael Burdick………….. Term expires: May 31, 2018 Karen Johnson………….. Term expires: May 31, 2016 Dan Witkowski…………… Term expires May 31, 2016 Prepared by: Arvilla Ohlde/AjO Consulting Robert W. Droll, Landscape Architect, P.S. MIG Inc. Jonathan Pheanis Project Manager 1 Currently serves as City Council Liaison to the Parks and Recreation Commission Page 4 City of Ellensburg Parks & Recreation System Comprehensive Plan Update 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 5 City of Ellensburg Parks & Recreation System Comprehensive Plan Update 2016 PREFACE It with great pleasure that we present to you the City of Ellensburg Park, Recreation, and Open Space Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Ringold For111ation and Associated Deposits
    LI.I u The Miocene to Pliocene Ringold For111ation and Associated Deposits 0 of the Ancestral Columbia River System, South-central Washington and North-central Oregon by Kevin A. Lindsey WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY I- AND EARTH RESOURCES Open File Report 96-8 c( November 1996 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF Natural Resources Jennifer M. Belcher· Commissioner of Public Lands Kaleen Cottingham· Supervisor CONTENTS 1 Introduction 3 Setting 3 Structural geology 4 Late Neogene depositional framework 6 The Ringold Formation 6 Previous studies 8 Age 8 Stratigraphy 10 Methods 10 Sediment facies associations 14 Facies association I 21 Facies association II 22 Facies association Ill 26 Facies association IV 26 Facies association V 26 Facies association distribution 27 Informal member of Wooded Island 33 Informal member of Taylor Flat 34 Informal member of Savage Island 35 Top of the Ringold Formation 37 Ringold correlatives outside the Pasco Basin 38 Conclusions 40 Acknowledgments 41 References cited Appendices A-D: Measured sections, core geologic logs, cross sections, and isopach and structure contour data, respectively ILLUSTRATIONS 2 Figure 1. Map showing regional geographic setting of the Columbia Basin and Hanford Site, south-central Washington, and north-central Oregon. 4 Figure 2. Map showing geographic setting of the Pasco Basin and Hanford Site, Washington. 5 Figure 3. Maps showing geologic structures in and near the Pasco Basin, and . Hanford Site. 7 Figure 4. Generalized surficial geologic map of the Pasco Basin. 9 Figure 5. Diagram showing late Neogene stratigraphy of the Pasco Basin emphasizing the Ringold Formation. 15 Figure 6. Outcrop photo of facies association I.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis, "Structure and Evolution of the Horse Heaven Hills in South
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Michael Curtis Hagood for the Master of Science in Geology presented February 21, 1985. Title: Structure-and Evolution of the Horse Heaven Hills in South-Central Washington. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE: Marvin H. Beeson, Chairman Michael L. Cummings Gilbert T. Benson Stephen P. Reidel The Horse Heaven Hills uplift in south-central Washington con- sists of distinct northwest and northeast trends which merge in the lower Yakima Valley. The northwest trend is adjacent to and parallels the Rattlesnake-Wallula alignment (RAW; a part of the Olympic-Wallowa lineament). The northwest trend and northeast trend consist of aligned or en echelon anticlines and monoclines whose axes are gener- ally oriented in the direction of the trend. At the intersection, La 2 folds in the northeast trend plunge onto and are terminated by folds of the northwest trend. The crest of the Horse Heaven Hills uplift within both trends is composed of a series of asymmetric, north vergent, eroded, usually double-hinged anticlines or monoclines. Some of these "major" anti- clines and monoclines are paralleled to the immediate north by lower- relief anticlines or monoclines. All anticlines approach monoclines in geometry and often change to a monoclinal geometry along their length. In both trends, reverse faults commonly parallel the axes of folds within the tightly folded hinge zones. Tear faults cut across the northern limbs of the anticlines and monoclines and are coincident with marked changes in the wavelength of a fold or a change in the trend of a fold. Layer-parallel faults commonly exist along steeply- dipping stratigraphic contacts or zones of preferred weakness in intraflow structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Concentrations of Nitrate in Drinking Water in the Lower Yakima River Basin, Groundwater Management Area, Yakima County, Washington, 2017
    Prepared in cooperation with Yakima County, Washington, for the Lower Yakima River Basin Groundwater Management Area Concentrations of Nitrate in Drinking Water in the Lower Yakima River Basin, Groundwater Management Area, Yakima County, Washington, 2017 Data Series 1084 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Yakama area drain site, Yakima River at Umantum, Washington (12484500), December 18, 2012. Photograph by Gabe Landrum, U.S. Geological Survey. Concentrations of Nitrate in Drinking Water in the Lower Yakima River Basin, Groundwater Management Area, Yakima County, Washington, 2017 By Raegan L. Huffman Prepared in cooperation with Yakima County, Washington, for the Lower Yakima River Basin Groundwater Management Area Data Series 1084 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Huffman, R.L., 2018, Concentrations of nitrate in drinking water in the lower Yakima River Basin, Groundwater Management Area, Yakima County, Washington, 2017: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Fishes from the Miocene Ellensburg Formation, South Central Washington
    FISHES OF THE MIO-PLIOCENE WESTERN SNAKE RIVER PLAIN AND VICINITY IV. FOSSIL FISHES FROM THE MIOCENE ELLENSBURG FORMATION, SOUTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON by GERALD R. SMITH, JAMES E. MARTIN, NATHAN E. CARPENTER MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, 204 no. 4 Ann Arbor, December 1, 2018 ISSN 0076-8405 PUBLICATIONS OF THE MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 204 no.4 WILLIAM FINK, Editor The publications of the Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, consist primarily of two series—the Miscellaneous Publications and the Occasional Papers. Both series were founded by Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradshaw H. Swales, and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. Occasionally the Museum publishes contributions outside of these series. Beginning in 1990 these are titled Special Publications and Circulars and each are sequentially numbered. All submitted manuscripts to any of the Museum’s publications receive external peer review. The Occasional Papers, begun in 1913, serve as a medium for original studies based principally upon the collections in the Museum. They are issued separately. When a sufficient number of pages has been printed to make a volume, a title page, table of contents, and an index are supplied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the series. The Miscellaneous Publications, initiated in 1916, include monographic studies, papers on field and museum techniques, and other contributions not within the scope of the Occasional Papers, and are published separately. Each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents. A complete list of publications on Mammals, Birds, Reptiles and Amphibians, Fishes, Insects, Mollusks, and other topics is available.
    [Show full text]