DOCSLIB.ORG

The Beginnings of Ohio Cities 15 Museum of Zoolozy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Beginnings of Ohio Cities 15 Museum of Zoolozy The HiJtorical Society THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO OFFICERS Prt.ridtnt ................................ WAI.T>:R J. SH>:RMAN Secretary-Treasurer .............. WILLIAM H. BLACK I t Vict·President ............ \VAI.T>:R A. Ev>:RSMAN Librarian .................................... N>:vIN 0. WtNTitR A DIRECTORY OF MICHIGAN MUSEUMS td Vice-President ................ MORRISON W. YouNG Assistant Librarian ................................ CARI. V1TZ Id Vice-Prtsident ...................... RuFus H. BAK>:R has recently been published by the Michigan Historical Commission with the Term expiring 1932- Term expiring 1933- Term expiring 1934- following contents, viz.: N>:VIN o. WINT>:R RuPus H. BAK>:R MoaRISON W. YouNG Page TRUSTEES WILLIAM A. GoSLIN>: G>:ORG!I H. B!ICKWITH THOMAS H. w AI.BRIDG!I Mas. ]AM>:s B>:NTI.>:Y WILLIAM F. BROF;R WALT>:R A. Ev>:RSMAN Foreword, by Dr. Alexander G. Ruthven ..................... ··.············ 5 { BLAK>:·MOR>: GODWIN SILAS E. HURIN RICHARD D. LoGAN G>:ORG>: D. W>:r.L>:S WAI.UR J. SH>:RMAN JULIAN H. TYL£R Alma, Hood Museum of Natural History ............................. ······.· Ann Arbor BULLETIN No.1 -VOL. 5 JANUARY, 1933 University Museums ~~f~:~t~f :-e~t~r~~~o~~:::: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ~~ Museum of Paleontology ................................. · · ... · · · · · · · · · · 14 The Beginnings of Ohio Cities 15 Museum of Zoolozy ................................... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · By Harvey Wilson Compton Art Museum .................................. · · · · · · ... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Ii Medical Museums ............. ·········· ·········· ························ 19 Superintendent of Toledo Public Schools 1886-1897-Died 1916 Mineralogy Museum ........................................ · .... · · · · · · · · · 19 Copyrl~ht 1933-Mrs. Nettle Compton Chemistry Museums ............................................... · · · · · · · · 19 Pharmaceutical Museums ........ .... ... ............ ................ · · · · · · · 19 FIRST PRINTING Stearns Collection of Musical Instruments ........... ................ ····.· 20 Museum of Classical Archaeology .................................... · . · · . · 20 Soon after the foundi·ng of Marietta, three other important settlements were Battle Creek, Museum of Natural History ................................... 21 be~n farther down the Ohio. These settlements were known as Losantiville, Bloomfield Hills, Cranbrook Museums ................................ · · · · ·.. 24 Columbia and North Be,nd. They were located in what is known as "The Symmes Purchase" and marked the beginning of the great commercial metropolis of Detroit Ohio. the city of Cincinnati. The large tract of land bordering on the Ohio, Children's Museum .................................................... · · · · 26 lying between the two Miamis, and extendi,ng north to the line forming the Detroit Historical Museum .... ... ................................. · · · · · ·.. 26 western extension of the north boundary of the Marietta purchase, constitutes Institute of Arts . .. ..... .......................... ...... ........ ... · · · ·. · 29 the original Symmes purchase. Parke, Davis & Company Herbarium ............................... · · ·.. 29 Grand Rapids MAJOR BENJAMIN STITES VISITS THE MIAMI VALLEY Grand Rapids Art Gallery ............................................. · . 32 In the spring of 1786, Major Benjamin Stites, a,n old soldier of the Revolu­ Kent Scientific Museum ......................... .. .................. · · · · · · 32 tion, who had become a trader to the west, was near Limestone, Kentucky, (now ~laysville) with a cargo of whiskey and flour. He joined an expedition of Hillsdale College Muse\li!l1J ............................................... ·.. 37 Kentuckians who we.rut in pursuit of some Indian horse thieves. 'Dhey followed Houghton, Michigan College of Mining and Technology, Geological Museum.. 39 the fleeing savages as far as the Little Miami and then gave up the chase. They Irish Hills, Historic Walker Tavern ......................................... 42 then crossed over to the Big Miami and Stites thus got a view of the amazing Kalamazoo Museum ........................................ ················ 45 beauty and fertility of the Miami valley. Stites at once hastened to New Jersey and impressed upon John Cleves Symmes, an influential member of Congress, his Lansing story of the wonderful lands and magnificent forests of the Miami valley. State Pioneer Museum . 4i War Relics Museum ............................................... ·····.··· .50 JOHN CLEVES SYMMES PETITIONS CONGRESS FOR A LAND GRANT Manistique, High School Library Museum Collection ......................... 51 In order to confirm Stites' account, Symmes made a journey himself to the Marquette, Northern State Teacher's College Museum ................... ·.... 53 .Miami country and in August of 1787, with twenty-three associates, petitioned Congress for a grant of the lands, lying between the two Miamis as above de­ Olivet College Museum ............................... ... ....... ... · · · · · · · · · scribed. Symmes assumed that Congress and the Treasury Board would grant Port Huron, Public Library Museum ............... ... .. ............. ······· him the same tenms as had been given the Ohio Company in the Muskingum Saginaw, Butman-Fish Library Museum .................................... 61 purchase, and without waiting to 1have his grant confirmed, at once entered into Three Oaks, Chamberlain Memorial Museum ................................. 63 a covenant with Stites to convey to him ten thousand acres of the best lands Ypsilanti, Michigan State Normal College Museum Collections............... 66 in the valley fronting on the Ohio and lying near the mouth of the little Miami. These lands were sold at sixty-six and two thirds ce;nts an acre, to be paid for in certificates of the public debt. Symmes also issued a pros,pectus stating that a contract had been made between himself and Congress for two million acres and inviting settlers to enter upon the la,nds at two thirds of a dollar per acre. THE HISTOR[CAL SOCIETY OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO After .May first, 1788, the price was to be one dollar per acre. Purchasers were not wanting. Mathias Denman of New Jersey took the whole section lying op­ is now unable to fill orders for Numbers 2 and 3, Volume 1; also Number posite the mouth of the Licking river, a tract destined to be the site of Ci,ncin­ Volume 2. Subscribers who do not care to preserve these numbers, will confer ~ati. But while eager settlers were hastening to the lands of the Miami country. a great favor by returning them to the office at 305 Produce Exchange. 1t suddenly developed that the Treasury Board had made no contract at all with The Historical Societ:y of Northwestern Ohio Symmes, and that he had been proceeding upon what he credulously supposed MATHIAS DENMAN, ROBERT PATTERSON AND JOHN FILSON, would be done. JOINT OWNERS OF LOSANTiVILLE SYMMES SECURES 250,000 ACRES BETWEEN THE TWO MIAMIS In the winter of 1787-8, Mathias Denman, of New Jersey, purchased of Judge At length, by the intercession of Symmes' friends in Congress, it was ar· vmmes seven hundred and forty acres on the north bank of the Ohio, opposite ranged with the Board that he should have twenty lmliles front on the Ohio, the mouth of the Licking river. He bough-q this land for five ~illings an acre, measured "along the several courses thereof" from the mouth of the Big Miami, the whole tract costing less than nine hundred dollars. and bounded by a north line which would limit the purchase to about one mil· Denmani's purpose was to lay out a town and establish a ferry. He doubtless lion acres. This left out the lands of Stites and many others. little dreamed that within a sing-le century, a mighty city of a half million For a long time Congress and the courts were vexed with complaints and people would stretch twelve miles along the valley aind crown the surrounding litigation growing out of the disappointments and violated contracts caused by terraces and hills. He afterwards formed a partnership with Col. Robert Patter- Symmes' lack of business method and judgment in disposing of lands in the n of Kentucky and John Filson, a sohool-master from Pennsylvania, who had Miami purchase. The whole trouble was finally adjusted in May, 1792, by an act turned surveyor. Denman, Patterson alnd Filson bound themselves by a written of Congress which extended the purchase along the Ohio the entire distance be· agreement, each having a one-third interest in the projected village. tween the two Miamis, but bounded by a line on the north which limited the whole purchase to about 250,000 acres, this being the quantity of land for which Patterson was a man of character and ability. He had been a gallant fighter Symmes and his associates had actually paid the stipulated price. m the Indian Wars and was the founder of Lexington. Kentucky. Filson is a somewhat obscure and mysterious figure whose fame as an ex­ NEW JERSEY COLONISTS FOUND A SETTLEMENT ON LITTLE plorer and writer has arisen mostly in recent years through the !historical re- MIAMI CALLED COLUMBIA arches of the Filson Club of Louisville. Filson appears to have been a tireless In the latter part of September, 1788, a party of 'Colonists were assembled at \\anclerer along the streams and through the forests of the Southwest for the Limestone. These pioneers !had been gathered
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ohio Land Acquisition Study Sheet
    2010 Back to History Lesson Plan “Dominion of War” Team Members: Cheryl Coker, Linda Dils, Karen Shank Instructional Post-Revolutionary War Settlement in Ohio Unit: Title of From Battlefield to Homestead Lesson: Grade Level: Grades 4-5 The lesson focuses on the impact the Description: Revolutionary War had on settlement in Ohio and the different ways land was obtained by settlers Standards: History: Benchmarks B & C, GLI 4.2; 5.6 Include Standard, People in Society: Benchmark B, GLI 4.3 Benchmark Letters, and GLI Geography: Benchmark C, GLI 4.10; 5.7, 5.10 numbers Skills: Benchmarks A & B, GLI 4.1, 4.3; 5.3 Duration: 3 - 4 45-minute classes Materials and Resources: “Revolutionary War Bounty Land Grants.” Lloyd DeWitt Bockstruck. Genealogy.com. http://www.genealogy.com/24_land.html. Images from Ohio Memory listed in Primary Source Materials. www.Daytonology.blogspot.com: “The Virginia Military District”: flowchart “Acquiring Land in Virginia Military District” 1 “Land Grants and Sales.” Ohio Historical Society. Ohio History Central: An Online Encyclopedia of Ohio History. http://ohiohistorycentral.org/entry.php?rec=1312&nm=Land-Grants-and- Sales. Outline map of Ohio Spiral Questions for John Yancy Land Grant document Study sheet used for note taking Homework assignment Primary Source Materials: Material available from Ohio Memory: www.ohiomemory.org . John Yancy Land Grant, November 23, 1819. Manchester Historical Society. Warren County Land Patent, August 20, 1812, United States General Land Office. Edna L. Bowyer Records Center & Archives of Warren County. William Salmon Deed, April 17, 1801, John Adams. Tuscarawas County Historical Society. Warm Up: Spiral question activity using the John Yancy Land Grant image Students will work in groups to answer questions; class discussion will follow to clarify details of the image.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 the Early History of the Public Domain
    Chapter 8 The Early History of the Public Domain During and following the period of the signing of the treaty of peace with Britain which ended the Revolutionary War, the vast territory be- yond the Allegheny Mountains became the property of the federal gov- ernment as then constituted under the Articles of Confederation. This development was the outcome of the disputes among the separate colonies as to ownership and jurisdiction over segments of the region ex- tending from the Great Lakes to the neighborhood of the Gulf of Mexico. As already shown in the previous chapters, much of this region was unexplored and populated only by Indian tribes. But the "right" to it was bought dearly in blood and suffering by the colonists in their struggle against the French claim to occupation. As some of the colonies had boundaries that did not abut any part of this region, they were unwilling to enter a union which thus cut them off from claims to a portion of this new territory. Appeasement came about only through the successive cessions of the claims of the various states in the Confederation to the national government. In this way, the public domain was created. It has proved to be a source of irrita- tion, dispute, corruption, and even despair to the Republic for more than a century and a half. Yet its distribution and development in this period form one of the most remarkable historical episodes in the story of civilized man. The Northwest Ordinance The first project to dispose of a part of the public domain was an ordinance passed by the Continental Congress in 1785.
    [Show full text]
  • The Capitol Dome
    THE CAPITOL DOME The Capitol in the Movies John Quincy Adams and Speakers of the House Irish Artists in the Capitol Complex Westward the Course of Empire Takes Its Way A MAGAZINE OF HISTORY PUBLISHED BY THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL HISTORICAL SOCIETYVOLUME 55, NUMBER 22018 From the Editor’s Desk Like the lantern shining within the Tholos Dr. Paula Murphy, like Peart, studies atop the Dome whenever either or both America from the British Isles. Her research chambers of Congress are in session, this into Irish and Irish-American contributions issue of The Capitol Dome sheds light in all to the Capitol complex confirms an import- directions. Two of the four articles deal pri- ant artistic legacy while revealing some sur- marily with art, one focuses on politics, and prising contributions from important but one is a fascinating exposé of how the two unsung artists. Her research on this side of can overlap. “the Pond” was supported by a USCHS In the first article, Michael Canning Capitol Fellowship. reveals how the Capitol, far from being only Another Capitol Fellow alumnus, John a palette for other artist’s creations, has been Busch, makes an ingenious case-study of an artist (actor) in its own right. Whether as the historical impact of steam navigation. a walk-on in a cameo role (as in Quiz Show), Throughout the nineteenth century, steam- or a featured performer sharing the marquee boats shared top billing with locomotives as (as in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington), the the most celebrated and recognizable motif of Capitol, Library of Congress, and other sites technological progress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Miami Slaughterhouse
    The Miami Slaughterhouse In the 1780’s, a Squirrel could reach Cincinnati from Pittsburg and never touch the ground. In part because of this heavy tree canopy, the land between the Little Miami River and the Great Miami River was known to have some of the richest farm land ever seen. The land between the Miami’s was a special hunting ground for the Indians. They would not give it up without a fight. In 1966, while researching a high school term paper, I found a diary written by Mary Covalt called “Reminiscences of Early Days about the construction and defense of Covalt Station primarily set during the years 1789 until 1795. “ My story tonight is about ordinary men and women coming down the Ohio River to settle in the land between the Little Miami and Great Miami Rivers. The Covalts who came down the Ohio and built Covalt Station in the area now known as Terrace Park were my ancestors. Mary Covalt’s diary along with other letters and personal accounts gives us the chance to use a zoom lens to focus on how life was lived was during this period. This story takes place in the Old Northwest Territory, and more specifically in the Ohio Territory and very specifically in the land between the two Miami Rivers. Not many of us would want to personally experience the sacrifices made to develop this land. Innocently, these pioneers came to a place that would embroil them in a life and death struggle for the next five years. These five years in the Old Northwest Territory would settle once and for all if America’s future growth would be west of the Allegany Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Northwest and the Texas Annexation Treaty
    East Texas Historical Journal Volume 7 Issue 2 Article 5 10-1969 The Old Northwest and the Texas Annexation Treaty Norman E. Tutorow Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj Part of the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Recommended Citation Tutorow, Norman E. (1969) "The Old Northwest and the Texas Annexation Treaty," East Texas Historical Journal: Vol. 7 : Iss. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj/vol7/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in East Texas Historical Journal by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ea!(t Texas Historical Journal 67 THE OLD NORTHWEST AND THE TEXAS ANNEXATION TREATY NORMAN E. TUTOROW On April 22. 1844. President Tyler submitted the Texas treaty to the United States Senate. sending with it scores of official documents and a catalog of arguments in (avor of annexation.' He offered evidence of popular support within Texas itself for annexation. He also argued that Britain had designs on Texas which, if allowed to mature, would pose Ii serious threat tu the South's "peculiar institution.'" According to Tyler, the annexation of Texas would be a blessing to the whole nation. Because Texas would most likely concentrate its e.fforts on raising cotton, the North and West would find there a market fOl" horses, beef, and wheat. Among the most important of the obvious advantages was security from outside interference with the institution of slavery, especially from British abolition· ists, who were working to get Texas to abolish slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Is Unique Visual Depiction of the Complex and Varied Land Survey Systems in Ohio Attachments
    Ohio Is Unique Visual Depiction of the complex and varied Land Survey Systems in Ohio Attachments: Bureau of Land Management Prime Meridian Map Illustrates the original land subdivision systems in the contiguous US, designated by the locations of Prime Meridians. Note Ohio detail. Ohio Original Land Subdivision Map and Key Visually exemplifies the complexity of Ohio’s original land subdivision systems in comparison with other states. Key demonstrates the differences in basic measurement systems of the various regions within Ohio. Provided by the Professional Land Surveyors of Ohio, Inc. 150 E. Wilson Bridge Rd., Suite 300; Worthington, OH 43085 Contact: Melinda Gilpin, Executive Director 614-761-2313 or [email protected] “Ohio is unique among the states of the Union in its variety of its land subdivisions. No other state has so many kinds of original surveys.” C.E. Sherman, Original Ohio Land Subdivisions, Volume III, Final Report, Ohio Cooperative Survey Example of a Metes and Bounds Survey Metes and Bounds Public Land Survey System (PLSS) States Principle Meridians and Baselines Map Bureau of Land Management A Very Brief Summary of Ohio Land Survey Subdivisions Virginia Military District • Only metes and bounds subdivision • Military bounty lands for Virginia soldiers Old Seven Ranges • 6-mi. sq. townships, 1785 section numbering • Surrounds Kimberly Grant Symmes Purchase • 6-mi. sq. townships, 1785 section numbering • Townships/ranges reversed Between the Miamis • Continues Symmes “system” Connecticut Western Reserve • 5-mi. sq. townships, privately subdivided • Includes Firelands, land to compensate residents of several Conn. towns burned during Revolution Ohio Company Purchase • 6-mi. sq. townships, 1785 section numbering • 1st large land purchase from federal government • Site of Marietta, 1st permanent settlement in NW Terr.
    [Show full text]
  • Antislavery Violence and Secession, October 1859
    ANTISLAVERY VIOLENCE AND SECESSION, OCTOBER 1859 – APRIL 1861 by DAVID JONATHAN WHITE GEORGE C. RABLE, COMMITTEE CHAIR LAWRENCE F. KOHL KARI FREDERICKSON HAROLD SELESKY DIANNE BRAGG A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2017 Copyright David Jonathan White 2017 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the collapse of southern Unionism between October 1859 and April 1861. This study argues that a series of events of violent antislavery and southern perceptions of northern support for them caused white southerners to rethink the value of the Union and their place in it. John Brown’s raid at Harpers Ferry, Virginia, and northern expressions of personal support for Brown brought the Union into question in white southern eyes. White southerners were shocked when Republican governors in northern states acted to protect members of John Brown’s organization from prosecution in Virginia. Southern states invested large sums of money in their militia forces, and explored laws to control potentially dangerous populations such as northern travelling salesmen, whites “tampering” with slaves, and free African-Americans. Many Republicans endorsed a book by Hinton Rowan Helper which southerners believed encouraged antislavery violence and a Senate committee investigated whether an antislavery conspiracy had existed before Harpers Ferry. In the summer of 1860, a series of unexplained fires in Texas exacerbated white southern fear. As the presidential election approached in 1860, white southerners hoped for northern voters to repudiate the Republicans. When northern voters did not, white southerners generally rejected the Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly fi'om the original or copy submitted- Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from aity type of conçuter printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to r i^ t in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9427761 Lest the rebels come to power: The life of W illiam Dennison, 1815—1882, early Ohio Republican Mulligan, Thomas Cecil, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological and Water Quality Study of the Huron River Basin, 2016
    Biological and Water Quality Study of the Huron River Basin, 2016 Erie, Seneca, Huron, Crawford and Richland Counties Huron River at Milan Wildlife Area Ohio EPA Technical Report AMS/2016‐HURON‐2 Division of Surface Water Assessment and Modeling Section January 2020 AMS/2016‐HURON‐2 Draft Biological and Water Quality Study of the Huron River Basin, 2016 January 2020 Draft Biological and Water Quality Study of the Huron River Basin, 2016 Erie, Seneca, Huron, Crawford and Richland Counties January 2020 Ohio EPA Technical Report AMS/2016‐HURON‐2 Prepared by: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 W. Town Street, Suite 700 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Groveport Field Office 4675 Homer Ohio Lane Groveport, Ohio 43125 and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Northwest District Office 347 N. Dunbridge Road Bowling Green, Ohio 43402 Mail to: P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216‐1049 Mike DeWine, Governor, State of Ohio Laurie A. Stevenson, Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Page 1 of 149 AMS/2016‐HURON‐2 Draft Biological and Water Quality Study of the Huron River Basin, 2016 January 2020 Table of Contents List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • "Fire Lands" in the War-Of-1812
    BLOCKHOUSES AND MILITIAMEN OF THE "FIRE LANDS" IN THE WAR-OF-1812 Including the “Indian” massacres and battles; and the local men who participated in those battles, and the many prior myths about them. T. DERBY 2014 ( reformatted / revised ) This is the upper portion of a map presumably drawn by surveyor Almon Ruggles* in 1808 ( and printed by Amos Doolittle in 1809) --- but newly appended here to illustrate the main points-of-interest relating to the War-of-1812 ( and the main interconnecting trails and "roads"). The area of present-day Huron County has been omitted above, because most of the local events of that time-period, occurred within the area which later became Erie County. ( Present-day Erie County was within the prior boundaries of original 'Huron County' until about 1838. The Danbury, or Marblehead, Peninsula is now within Ottawa County.) The area to the immediate east of the above illustration, was also within geographical 'Huron County' during the War-of-1812 ( although the only pioneer settlers residing in that section before 1812, lived in the Black River Twp. area of later-day Lorain County). The area to the immediate west of this map, was still the "Indian Lands". ( all sites are approx.) A – FLAMMAND'S INDIAN-TRADING-POST ( a.k.a. “FLAMMOND”, “FLEMING”, etc.) B - RUSSELL'S BLOCKHOUSE, TAVERN & GENERAL-STORE C - "ABBOT SETTLEMENT" [& later "old county-seat"] D - PARKER'S BLOCKHOUSE E - "PIPE CREEK SETTLEMENT" & "FORT LIBERTY" F - "COLD CREEK SETTLEMENT" & MASSACRE of the SNOW and BUTLER families. G - MURDER of BUEL and GIBBS H - PARSONS' BLOCKHOUSE & "FIRST" AMBUSH on the PENINSULA 1 (star) - FORT HURON ("FORT NONSENSE") 2 (star) - FORT AVERY 3 (arrow) - "ROAD" to 'LOWER SANDUSKY' & DETROIT 4 (arrow)- "OLD STATE ROAD" to MANSFIELD [*- Ruggles had not yet surveyed Sandusky Bay in 1808, but he estimated it, based on prior surveyors' very inaccurate work).] Preface.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks on the Dedication of the Restored Fort Washington Monument
    Remarks on the Dedication of the Restored Fort Washington Monument by ARTHUR G. KING, M. D. On Memorial Day, May 30, 1963, in an impressive ceremony at the site, the restored Fort Washington Monument was dedicated. The original monument had stood at Third and Ludlow Streets since 1901, but was dismantled in the 1950's when the Third Street Distributor was constructed. The new monument contains a revised inscription and a corrected map; on the map of the old monument, the location of the Fort was in error. We take pride in the fact that our Society has been vitally instru- mental in the planning and completion of the new monument. Moreover, HPSO Collection Unveiling of the Fort Washington Monument June 14, 1901 Dedication of the Restored Fort Washington Monument 203 the main address for the dedicatory ceremony was presented by Arthur G. King, M.D., the most knowledgeable authority on Fort Washington, who represented the Historical and Philosophical Society of Ohio. We take pleasure in presenting Dr. King's remarks. Memorial Day is a particularly appropriate time for the rededica- tion of this monument to Fort Washington; first, to recall that Cin- cinnati is where it is because of Fort Washington; and second, in • :- • Courtesy Cincinnati Enquirer Dr. Arthur G. King delivering main address at dedication of restored Fort Washington Monument—May 30, 1963 204 The Bulletin memory of the many members of its garrison who died in the Indian Wars defending our city in its infancy. In 1788 John Cleves Symmes envisioned the entire Ohio River front from the Little Miami to the Great Miami occupied by settle- ments, of which the most important would be North Bend, where he later set up his headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • SIGNIFICANCE of the UNITED STATES PUBLIC LAND SURVEY Jerry A
    SIGNIFICANCE OF THE UNITED STATES PUBLIC LAND SURVEY Jerry A. O'Callaghan Editorial Foreword The speech which follows relates to an episode in American his- tory that is intimately intertwined with Western Pennsylvania tradi- tion and has its roots deeply imbedded in its soil. The survey of the Mason and Dixon Line had been started in 1766 and halted by Indian hostility in southern Bedford County, in 1767. Not until 1784 was it feasible to complete the project to its intended five degrees measured from the Delaware River. A noted panel of scientists made up the survey team :Dr. James Ewing, Pro- vost of the University of Pennsylvania ;David Rittenhouse, mathema- tician and astronomer of the same institution; Dr. James Madison, Bishop of Virginiaand President of the College of William and Mary ; John Page of Virginia; John Lukens of Pennsylvania ;Andrew Elli- cott, surveyor of more state lines than any man of his day or since ; and Thomas Hutchins. Hutchins, it willbe remembered, had been present at and rendered most valuable service at every important event at Fort Pitt. InForbes' army he had merited favorable mention in reports, had been very useful to Engineer Captain Harry Gordon in building Fort Pitt, had assist- ed Gordon in the first mapping of the course of the Ohio River, had accompanied Bouquet, in1760, to establish Fort Presqu' Isle,had been Bouquet's engineer on his never-to-be-forgotten expedition into Ohio to quell Pontiac's Indian allies, in 1764, had been engineer in General Green's army in the South in the Revolution, and now enjoyed the appointment as Geographer of the United States.
    [Show full text]