Fact Sheet: High-Rise and Low-Rise Multifamily 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fact Sheet: High-Rise and Low-Rise Multifamily 2019 2019 ENERGY CODE Residential and Nonresidential Ace Title 24, Part 6 Resources Fact Sheet High-Rise and Low-Rise Multifamily What are High-Rise and Low-Rise Multifamily Buildings? Multifamily buildings contain multiple dwelling units that share common walls and may also share common floors or Multifamily Buildings ceilings. Hotel and motel buildings, dormitories or other Occupancies R-1, R-2 and R-4 congregate residences (dormitory-style sleeping quarters) with • Low-Rise: three or less habitable six or more “guest rooms,” and townhomes with three habitable stories above grade stories or less are not considered multifamily. • High-Rise: four or more habitable Building type and the number of habitable stories in a stories above grade multifamily building dictate whether it is considered “high-rise” Occupancy R-3 includes single-family or “low-rise” and which of California’s Building Energy Efficiency homes, duplexes and townhomes Standards (Title 24, Part 6 or Energy Code) requirements apply to it. 3-habitable stories or less above grade and is subject to the single-family Mixed Occupancy requirements of the Energy Code. All dwelling units and common areas within a multifamily Occupancy R (residential) building are considered Occupancy R, although common areas may include nonresidential uses that support the residential occupancy, such as leasing offices and gyms. Some different Energy Code requirements apply to the dwelling units than to the common areas. When there are multiple building code occupancy types in a project (i.e., those typically called “mixed-use” buildings with Occupancy M for a retail space and Occupancy R for the multifamily spaces), each occupancy is looked at separately unless the nonresidential occupancy is < 20% of the total conditioned floor area (CFA). In that case, the envelope and mechanical systems of the minor occupancy can show compliance with either the primary occupancy (multifamily) or the minor occupancy requirements (see Tables 1-7 below for details), but the Mandatory measures of the minor occupancy must be met. Indoor lighting for both mixed occupancy buildings and multifamily dwelling units or common areas must meet the applicable Energy Code space type requirements, except when the total low-rise multifamily common area is ≤ 20% of the overall CFA. Such areas require residential high-efficacy luminaires and occupancy sensor controls instead of nonresidential lighting. Why? When applying the Energy Code, it is important to properly identify multifamily projects as low-rise or high-rise. Multifamily projects can be complicated because a mix of nonresidential and residential requirements apply, based on the space types within the building. Relevant Code Sections 2019 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards, Title 24, Part 6: • Section 100.0 – Scope • Section 100.1 – Definitions and Rules of Construction • Subchapter 2 (Sections 110.0-110.12) – All Occupancies – Mandatory Requirements for the Manufacture, Construction and Installation of Systems, Equipment and Building Components • Subchapter 3 (Sections 120.1-120.9) – Nonresidential, High-Rise Residential, Hotel/ Motel Occupancies, and Covered Processes – Mandatory Requirements • Section 130.1 – Nonresidential, High-Rise Residential, Hotel/Motel Occupancies – Mandatory Indoor Lighting Controls 2019 Title 24, Part 6 - Residential and Nonresidential High-Rise and Low-Rise Multifamily Page 1 of 8 2020-11-05 • Section 130.4 – Nonresidential, High-Rise Residential, Hotel/Motel Occupancies – Lighting Control Acceptance and Installation Certificate Requirements • Section 140.3 – Nonresidential, High-Rise Residential, Hotel/Motel Occupancies – Prescriptive Requirements for Building Envelopes • Section 140.4 – Nonresidential, High-Rise Residential, Hotel/Motel Occupancies – Prescriptive Requirements for Space Conditioning Systems • Section 140.5 – Nonresidential, High-Rise Residential, Hotel/Motel Occupancies – Prescriptive Requirements for Service Water Heating Systems • Section 140.6 – Nonresidential, High-Rise Residential, Hotel/Motel Occupancies – Prescriptive Requirements for Indoor Lighting • Section 140.9 – Nonresidential, High-Rise Residential, Hotel/Motel Occupancies – Prescriptive Requirements for Covered Processes • Section 150.0 – Low-Rise Residential Buildings – Mandatory Features and Devices • Section 150.1 – Performance and Prescriptive Compliance Approaches for Low-Rise Residential Buildings • Section 150.2 – Low-Rise Residential Buildings – Additions and Alterations • Joint Reference Appendix JA4 – U-factor, C-factor, and Thermal Mass Data • Joint Reference Appendix JA5 – Technical Specifications for Occupant Controlled Smart Thermostats Mandatory Measures Mandatory requirements that apply to both low- and high-rise multifamily buildings can be found in Subchapter 2 (Sections 110.0 - 110.12). Mandatory requirements must always be met and cannot be traded off, even when using the Performance approach. Prescriptive vs. Performance Measures In addition to meeting these Mandatory requirements, either a Prescriptive or Performance compliance path may be followed for multifamily projects. The Performance path is most commonly used, as it allows flexibility to trade-off performance between building systems associated with the conditioned areas of the project. In order to show compliance using the Performance path, compliance software certified by the California Energy Commission (Energy Commission) must be used. The compliance software compares the building design to a similar building that meets Prescriptive requirements. Additionally, lighting What is a Solar Ready Area? in unconditioned spaces, outdoor lighting and sign lighting must use the Prescriptive A solar ready area or “solar zone” is pathway and cannot be included in the Performance path. a section of the roof designated and reserved for the future installation of a Solar Ready Areas solar photovoltaic (PV) or solar thermal Newly constructed multifamily buildings with 4-10 stories or less are required to include system and must be shown on the roof either an allocated solar ready area or show compliance with the appropriate exceptions plans. found in Section 110.10. Low-rise multifamily buildings ≤ 3 stories that have a PV system • Sizing: The solar area must be at installed are not required to have an allocated solar-ready area. least 15% of the total roof area of Section 110.10 also includes requirements for orientation, shading, structural design loads the building (less any skylight area) and interconnection pathways for electrical service. and may consist of multiple sub-areas Exceptions to these requirements for multifamily projects include: provided that each sub-area is at least • The roof is being used for parking or heliport OR 80 ft² with no dimension < 5 feet • Provide JA5-compliant demand response thermostat at each dwelling unit AND one of • Location: The solar area must be the following: located on the roof or overhang of the – Dwelling unit: ENERGY STAR® dishwasher plus either an ENERGY STAR refrigerator building, or on the roof or overhang or a whole house fan driven by an electronically commutated motor OR of another structure located within – Dwelling unit: Home automation system capable of controlling at least the 250 feet of the building, or on covered appliances and lighting, and responding to demand response signals OR parking installed in conjunction with the building project – Building: Alternative plumbing piping system for wastewater irrigation OR – Building: Rainwater catchment system using at least 65% of roof area OR EnergyCodeAce.com 2019 Title 24, Part 6 - Residential and Nonresidential High-Rise and Low-Rise Multifamily Page 2 of 8 – Meet CALGreen (Title 24, Part 11) Section A4.106.8.2 requiring at least 15% of parking to be EVSE charging ready Exceptions that apply to high-rise multifamily buildings only include: • An installed PV system with DC power rating of at least 1W/ ft² of roof area OR • Solar hot water-heating system meeting the Prescriptive requirements Section 150.1(c)8Biii of 20% solar saving fraction (SSF) in Climate Zones 1-9 and 35% SSF in Climate Zones 10-16. PV Requirements and Battery Storage Options Newly constructed low-rise multifamily buildings are Prescriptively required to have PV systems which are sized based on the building’s Climate Zone and the number of dwelling units (Section 150.1(c)14 Equation 150.1-C) when more than 80 ft² of contiguous roof is available within the effective solar access area(s) and when the building is shown to have an annual solar access of at least 70%. There is an option to reduce the Prescriptive PV minimum sizing requirements and Prescriptive building feature requirements using battery storage utilizing the Performance method for compliance (minimum requirements will apply to battery storage size and controls). See the Residential Alternative Calculation Method (ACM) Manual for more information. Envelope Mandatory and Prescriptive requirements for roofs, walls, floors and windows vary by building construction type (i.e., wood framed or metal framed) and whether the project is low-rise or high-rise. Multifamily Dwelling Common Mixed Use: Type Unit Areas Nonresidential Occupancies Mandatory measures of minor occupancy must be met. Low-Rise Low-Rise Low-Rise < 20% CFA: Low-Rise Residential Residential Residential §§150.0, 150.1, 150.2 §§150.0, §§150.0, or Nonresidential §§110.8, 120.7, 140.3 150.1, 150.2 150.1, 150.2 ≥ 20% CFA: Nonresidential §§110.8, 120.7, 140.3 High-Rise Nonresidential
Recommended publications
  • ABSTRACT the Main Feature of a Conventional Terraced Housing Development Is Rows of Rectangular Shaped Houses with the Narrow Fa
    MAKING A RETURN ON INVESTMENT IN PASSIVE ARCHITECTURE TERRACED HOUSES DEVELOPMENT Wan Rahmah Mohd Zaki Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Abdul Hadi Nawawi Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaQJiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Sabarinah Sh Ahmad Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaQJiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The main feature of a conventional terraced housing development is rows of rectangular shaped houses with the narrow facade as the frontage. Consequently, this limits natural cross ventilation and daylight penetration into the middle of the houses; and cause for unnecessary energy consumption on mechanical cooling and artijicial lighting to make the living spaces comfortable for occupants. Such inconsideration is mainly attributed to the optimum configuration of houses which offers the most economic return desired by the developer. Passive Architecture (PA) design strategies can make terraced houses more conducive for occupants as well as gives reasonable returns to the developer. The idea is demonstrated on a hypothetical double storeys terraced scheme in a 2.5 acre site whereby it is transformed intofour types of PA terraced houses development. The Return on Invesfment of the PA terraced houses is ascertained for two situations, ie., (i) fwed sales price for all types of house; and (ii) added premium to PA terraced houses due to the positive unintended effects such as low density housing, etc. If critical criteria for demand and supply in housing remain constant, it is found that PA terraced housing development offers competitive returns to the developer relative to the returns for conventional terraced housing scheme. Keyworh: Orientation, Indoor Comfort and Operational Energy 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Housing and Energy The recent public awareness on sustainability calls for housing to not only serves as a basic shelter but also to be energy efficient, i.e., designed to make occupants need low operational energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations As of 9/4/2021
    Approved Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations as of 9/30/2021 Permit Exp. City Facility Address Owner Permit # Date Beaumont Slangin Plates 34936 Hagen Hts Kipp Funderburk PR0081203 3/31/2022 Blythe Davis Down Home 409 San Luis Wy Stacy Davis PR0080525 12/31/2021 Dining La Cocina de Monica 18211 Maple Dr Monica Ferrer PR0082034 6/30/2022 Quesa Virria Tacos 461 Seville Ln Gustavo Valdez PR0080222 11/30/2021 Ruelas Tosti House 380 S 5th St Nora Patricia Ruelas PR0080112 10/31/2021 Canyon Lake The Wicked Spoon Cafe 29748 Redwood Dr Samantha Gorrell PR0078967 2/28/2022 Cathedral City Carnitas Valdez 33531 Pueblo Trail Julia E Valdez PR0078655 1/31/2022 Pupusas Claudia 33609 Sky Blue Water Trail Claudia Moreno PR0080245 11/30/2021 Shep's Kitchen 30260 Travis Ave Robert Shephard PR0081048 3/31/2022 Smokey Lips BBQ 31265 Sky Blue Water Trl CAE LLC PR0081854 5/31/2022 Coachella El Reaper 84017 Manhattan Ave Omar Francisco Leon PR0081963 6/30/2022 Corona Amy's CaliPinoy Kitchen 5750 Red Haven St Amelia Victorio PR0082262 7/31/2022 B's Rollin BBQ 2620 Hawk Cir Eric Burnell PR0080792 2/28/2022 Barra De Pan 1104 Fullerton Ave Lucina Silva PR0078814 1/31/2022 BNL BBQ 1100 Newfield Cir Lupe Aguilar PR0079624 7/31/2022 Boonies Pit & Q LLC 823 S Howard St Christopher McCoy PR0081858 5/31/2022 Cazonci Mexican Kitchen 1599 Border Ave Unit F Robert Oliveros PR0080900 2/28/2022 Chef J's Table 11468 Alton Dr James Cameron PR0079569 7/31/2022 Convertible Kitchen 8911 Carnation Dr Talisha Seraj PR0080521 12/31/2021 El Jefe Cuisine 1028 E Francis St Che Galvan PR0080153 10/31/2021 Enchilame y Mas 1567 Del Norte Dr Olivia Cordova PR0080623 1/31/2022 Jerky Jerk 7581 Stonegate Dr Evon McMurry PR0078974 3/31/2022 Approved Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations as of 9/30/2021 Permit Exp.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDE to RESIDENCE LIVING 2021-2022 Florida State University
    GUIDE TO RESIDENCE LIVING 2021-2022 Florida State University (850) 644-2860 [email protected] 1 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................. 2 Residential Student Experience ......................................................................... 3 Learning Goals .................................................................................................. 4 Florida State University Civility Statement ......................................................... 4 Residence Hall Staff ........................................................................................... 5 COVID-19 & Public Health ................................................................................. 6 Residence Hall Information ................................................................................ 7 Moving In........................................................................................................... 9 Moving Out ...................................................................................................... 10 Personalize Your Room .................................................................................... 11 Getting Involved in the Halls ............................................................................ 12 Roommate Relationships ................................................................................ 14 Safety in the Halls ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Single Family Residence Design Guidelines
    ADOPTED BY SANTA BARBARA CITY COUNCIL IN 2007 Available at the Community Development Department, 630 Garden Street, Santa Barbara, California, (805) 564-5470 or www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov 2007 CITY COUNCIL, 2007 ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW, 2007 Marty Blum, Mayor Iya Falcone Mark Wienke Randall Mudge Brian Barnwell Grant House Chris Manson-Hing Dawn Sherry Das Williams Roger Horton Jim Blakeley Clay Aurell Helene Schneider Gary Mosel SINGLE FAMILY DESIGN BOARD, 2010 UPDATE PLANNING COMMISSION, 2007 Paul R. Zink Berni Bernstein Charmaine Jacobs Bruce Bartlett Glen Deisler Erin Carroll George C. Myers Addison Thompson William Mahan Denise Woolery John C. Jostes Harwood A. White, Jr. Gary Mosel Stella Larson PROJECT STAFF STEERING COMMITTEE Paul Casey, Community Development Director Allied Neighborhood Association: Bettie Weiss, City Planner Dianne Channing, Chair & Joe Guzzardi Jaime Limón, Design Review Supervising Planner City Council: Helene Schneider & Brian Barnwell Heather Baker, Project Planner Planning Commission: Charmaine Jacobs & Bill Mahan Jason Smart, Planning Technician Architectural Board of Review: Richard Six & Bruce Bartlett Tony Boughman, Planning Technician (2009 Update) Historic Landmarks Commission: Vadim Hsu GRAPHIC DESIGN, PHOTOS & ILLUSTRATIONS HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION, 2007 Alison Grube & Erin Dixon, Graphic Design William R. La Voie Susette Naylor Paul Poirier & Michael David Architects, Illustrations Louise Boucher H. Alexander Pujo Bill Mahan, Illustrations Steve Hausz Robert Adams Linda Jaquez & Kodiak Greenwood,
    [Show full text]
  • Five Keys to Safer Food Manual
    FIVE KEYS TO SAFER FOOD MANUAL DEPARTMENT OF FOOD SAFETY, ZOONOSES AND FOODBORNE DISEASES FIVE KEYS TO SAFER FOOD MANUAL DEPARTMENT OF FOOD SAFETY, ZOONOSES AND FOODBORNE DISEASES INTRODUCTION Food safety is a significant public health issue nsafe food has been a human health problem since history was first recorded, and many food safety Uproblems encountered today are not new. Although governments all over the world are doing their best to improve the safety of the food supply, the occurrence of foodborne disease remains a significant health issue in both developed and developing countries. It has been estimated that each year 1.8 million people die as a result of diarrhoeal diseases and most of these cases can be attributed to contaminated food or water. Proper food preparation can prevent most foodborne diseases. More than 200 known diseases are transmitted through food.1 The World Health Organization (WHO) has long been aware of the need to educate food handlers about their responsibilities for food safety. In the early 1990s, WHO developed the Ten Golden Rules for Safe Food Preparation, which were widely translated and reproduced. However, it became obvious that something simpler and more generally applicable was needed. After nearly a year of consultation with food safety expertsandriskcommunicators, WHOintroducedtheFive KeystoSaferFoodposterin2001.TheFive Keys toSaferFoodposterincorporatesallthemessagesoftheTen Golden Rules for Safe Food Preparation under simpler headings that are more easily remembered and also provides more details on the reasoning behind the suggested measures. The Five Keys to Safer Food Poster The core messages of the Five Keys to Safer Food are: (1) keep clean; (2) separate raw and cooked; (3) cook thoroughly; (4) keep food at safe temperatures; and (5) use safe water and raw materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead in Your Home Portrait Color
    Protect Your Family From Lead in Your Home United States Environmental Protection Agency United States Consumer Product Safety Commission United States Department of Housing and Urban Development March 2021 Are You Planning to Buy or Rent a Home Built Before 1978? Did you know that many homes built before 1978 have lead-based paint? Lead from paint, chips, and dust can pose serious health hazards. Read this entire brochure to learn: • How lead gets into the body • How lead afects health • What you can do to protect your family • Where to go for more information Before renting or buying a pre-1978 home or apartment, federal law requires: • Sellers must disclose known information on lead-based paint or lead- based paint hazards before selling a house. • Real estate sales contracts must include a specifc warning statement about lead-based paint. Buyers have up to 10 days to check for lead. • Landlords must disclose known information on lead-based paint or lead-based paint hazards before leases take efect. Leases must include a specifc warning statement about lead-based paint. If undertaking renovations, repairs, or painting (RRP) projects in your pre-1978 home or apartment: • Read EPA’s pamphlet, The Lead-Safe Certifed Guide to Renovate Right, to learn about the lead-safe work practices that contractors are required to follow when working in your home (see page 12). Simple Steps to Protect Your Family from Lead Hazards If you think your home has lead-based paint: • Don’t try to remove lead-based paint yourself. • Always keep painted surfaces in good condition to minimize deterioration.
    [Show full text]
  • Office Lighting: a Review of 80 Years of Standards and Recommendations
    LBL-35036 WG-31I Published in the Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE Industry Applications Society AnnUalMeeting, October 2-8, 1993 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Office Lighting: A Review of 80 Years of Standards and Recommendations Wemer K.E. Osterhaus Energy and Environment Division Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California 1 Cyclotron Road Berkeley, Califomia 94720 May 1993 This work was supported by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Building Technologies, Building Systems and Materials Division of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE- AC03-76SF00098. Office Lighting: A Review of 80 Years of Standards and Recommendations . Werner K. E. Osterhaus Windows and Daylighting Group Building Technologies Program Energy and Environment Division Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720 U.S.A. Abstract - This paper traces the development of Lighting conditions were among the dominant complaints quantitative office lighting standards from its from workers. Illuminating engineers recognized that beginnings to the present. It discusses the inadequate lighting was responsible for many industrial oources of recommended lighting practice, the accidents. Extensive data, accumulated by Simpson [i] and nature of the quantitative recommendations, and others provide convincing proof of this condition. The loss trends in recommended values on a comparative of visual power through improper lighting could not be so basis. A critical assessment of contemporary easily recorded, but ophthalmologists [2 and 3] warned about standards is provided within this historical its dangers. context. "Insufficient and improperly applied illumination is a prolific cause of industrial accidents. In the past few years I. INTRODUCTION numerous investigators, studying the cause of accidents, have found that the accident rate in plants with poor lighting is In exploring the development of lighting standards for higher than in similar plants which are well illuminated.
    [Show full text]
  • Office Market Assessment Montgomery County, Maryland
    Office Market Assessment Montgomery County, Maryland Prepared for the Montgomery County Planning Department June 18, 2015 Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................................... iv Regional Office Vacancies (Second Quarter, 2015) ............................................................... iv Findings .................................................................................................................................... v Recommendations .................................................................................................................... v Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 Montgomery County’s Challenge ............................................................................................ 1 I. Forces Changing the Office Market ....................................................................................... 3 Types of Office Tenants ........................................................................................................... 3 Regional and County Employment ......................................................................................... 4 Regional Employment Trends ............................................................................................. 4 Montgomery County Employment Trends .......................................................................... 6 Regional
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Family Residential Design Guidelines[PDF]
    MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted by the Marin County Board of Supervisors on December 10, 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY STAFF Susan Adams, District 1 Brian C. Crawford Katie Rice, District 2 Director of Community Development Agency Kathrin Sears, District 3 Thomas Lai Steve Kinsey, District 4 Assistant Director of Community Development Agency Judy Arnold, District 5 Jeremy Tejirian Planning Manager of Planning Division PLANNING COMMISSION Stacey Laumann Katherine Crecelius, At-Large Planner of Planning Division Ericka Erickson, At-Large Don Dickenson, District 1 Margot Biehle, District 2 John Eller, District 3 Michael Dyett, Principal-In-Charge Wade Holland, District 4 Matt Taecker, Principal Peter Theran, District 5 Jeannie Eisberg, Senior Associate WORKING GROUP Supported by a grant from the Metropolitan Transportation Bob Hayes Commission Smart Growth Technical Assistance Program Bruce Burman John Eller Steven Aiello Curry Eckelhoff Rich Gumbiner Allan Bortel Marge Macris Kathleen Harris Robert Pendoley Scott Gerber Steven Lucas Sim Van der Ryn Cover image adapted from: The American Transect, http://www.transect.org/rural_img.htm i CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................................................1-1 Purpose ...............................................................................................................................................................1-1 Fundamental Design
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Energy in Agricultural Lighting
    INTRODUCTION lighting is needed in specific areas of agricultural Innovations in lighting technologies have operations, including offices and packing and greatly improved the efficiency of lighting fixtures processing areas. Lighting used to supplement or in transforming electricity into visible light. Energy replace natural light for plant growth has very savings in lighting are further facilitated by a specific requirements and is typically the most growing body of knowledge about the effects of intensive use of energy for lighting in agriculture. light intensity and quality on plants, animals and humans. In 2005, electricity consumption by US LIGHTING TYPES agricultural operations was approximately 0.14 There are many types of lighting. The most quadrillion BTU (6), driven chiefly by lighting- and commonly used lamps are incandescent, fluorescent ventilation-related energy expenditures in the and a variety of high intensity discharge lights. livestock and greenhouse sectors. As these sectors Halogen lamps are a type of incandescent lighting comprise a comparatively large proportion of New that is slightly more efficient than incandescent Jersey agriculture, conservation of energy in lamps, but typically more expensive to purchase. lighting is an excellent way for New Jersey farmers Fluorescent lamps may be linear or curved tubes or to save energy. small diameter compact bulbs (CFLs). High This document presents an overview of how intensity discharge (HID) lamps include low- energy is consumed in lighting and ways to pressure sodium (LPS), high-pressure sodium minimize its consumption. The most important (HPS), mercury vapor and metal halide. As light opportunity for energy savings in lighting, however, emitting diode (LED) technologies evolve, LEDs is the maximal use of ambient natural light, which are used more frequently in a variety of has little to no associated energy use.
    [Show full text]
  • Iii. Housing Constraints
    III. HOUSING CONSTRAINTS The provision of adequate and affordable housing can be constrained by a number of factors. This section assesses the various governmental, market, infrastructure and environmental factors that may serve as a potential constraint to housing development and improvement in Cypress. A. GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Land Use Controls The Cypress General Plan and Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance provide for a range of residential land use designations/zones in the City: Low Density Residential (RS-15000; RS-6000) - Provides for development of low density detached single-family dwellings. Maximum density is 5 dwelling units per acre. Medium Density Residential (RS-5000; RM-15) - Provides for development of medium density duplexes, townhomes, condominiums, and apartments. Single- family homes may also be appropriate. Maximum density is 15 dwelling units per acre. High Density Residential (RM-20) - Provides opportunities for development of apartments, condominiums, townhouses, and other group dwellings in addition to single-family development. Maximum density is 20 dwelling units per acre. Mobile Home Park (MHP-20A) - Provides for the development of mobile home parks subject to certain zoning restrictions. Maximum density is 12 spaces per gross acre. Cypress’ residential development standards are summarized in Table III-1. The City’s standards are not excessive, are fairly comparable to other Orange County communities, and do not serve as a constraint to development. 2008-2014 HOUSING ELEMENT III-1 HOUSING CONSTRAINTS TECHNICAL
    [Show full text]
  • Our Guide to Barn Light Garage Lighting
    OUR GUIDE TO BARN LI GHT GARAGE LIGHTING Garage lighting plays an important role in the overall exterior lighting plan for any home. The garage not only serves as the access point for many homeowners but is often the first structure visitors see as they approach the home. Stylish, easy-to-customize fixtures from Barn Light Electric oer plenty of illumination without harsh glare while adding the curb appeal you desire! SINGLE CAR GARAGE 1 2 3 4 5 #1: (2) Drake Gooseneck Lighst (14” Shades, 100-Black, G15 Gooseneck Arms, Cast Guard & Clear Glass), #2: (2) Original™ Warehouse Gooseneck Lights (18” Shades, 615-Oil-Rubbed Bronze, G22 Gooseneck Arms), #3: Goodrich® Marathon Porcelain Gooseneck Light (16” Shade, 150-Porcelain Black, G22 Gooseneck Arm), #4: (2) Chestnut Gooseneck Lights (16“ Shades, 995-Raw Copper, G15 Gooseneck Arms), #5: The Original™ Warehouse Gooseneck Light (14” Shade, 300-Dark Green, G15 Gooseneck Arm) What are the most popular Gooseneck Arms used for garage gooseneck lighting? Q Great question! We have more than 25 Gooseneck Arms and we’ve seen customers use A them all. However, our most popular gooseneck arms include: G22, G15, G11, G3 and G1. [email protected] (800) 407-8784 320 KNOX MCRAE DRIVE, Titusvi lle, FL 32780 barnlight.com 2-CAR GARAGE 1 For two-car garages, multiple options exist for lighting including one large fixture over each door, one large fixture between two doors, or smaller fixtures flanking the doors. Depending upon your taste, the amount of light can be manipulated with the type and wattage of bulb.
    [Show full text]