DOCSLIB.ORG

Mineral Mines and Quarries (MMQ) Reporting Classes for Occupational Hygiene Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mineral Mines and Quarries (MMQ) Reporting Classes for Occupational Hygiene Data Mineral Mines and Quarries (MMQ) reporting classes for occupational hygiene data Table 1 – Open cut/surface operations reporting classes (including overburden removal, mining and quarrying activities) Activity DNRME reporting classes Primary task descriptions Code Development of the Surface/development/dozer Dozer operations including pushing QMQ OC001 area prior to and raking of vegetation and production mining or overburden quarrying Surface/development/scraper Single or tandem scraper QMQ OC002 operations for removal/ relocation of overburden or waste material Surface/development/excavator Excavator operations -including QMQ OC003 preparation of the area, loading trucks Surface/development/rubber tyred Loader operations - either solitary QMQ OC004 loader or in conjunction with trucks Surface/development/truck Truck haulage of waste or QMQ OC005 overburden material Surface/development/blasting/drill Drill and blast operations in mine QMQ OC006 development - drilling of blast pattern only Surface/development/blasting/charge Drill and blast operations, including QMQ OC007 up charge up, firing the shot, blast clearance, management of exclusion zone, and other operations associated with drill and blast Production - extraction Surface/production/excavator Excavator operations - including QMQ OC008 of target/ore or rock loading trucks and stone cutting Surface/production/rubber tyred Loader operations - either solitary QMQ OC009 loader or with trucks Surface/production/truck Haulage by truck QMQ OC010 Surface/production/train Haulage by train QMQ OC011 Routine services to Surface/services/refuel Refuelling and servicing of mobile QMQ OC012 maintain the area and plant in the mining areas mobile plant Surface/services/water cart Water cart or truck - dust QMQ OC013 suppression and material management Surface/services/road maintenance Graders or scrapers in maintaining QMQ OC014 the internal travel ways Technical/professional Surface/technical/supervisor Supervisor for the site-not operating QMQ OC015 advisors including plant science and QMQ OC016 Surface/technical/technical Technical/professional advisors engineering roles including geologists, metallurgist, engineers, chemist, health and safety specialist and similar QMQ OC017 Surface not otherwise Surface/not otherwise classified Any other reporting classes not classified accounted for in surface operations Table 2 – Underground operations reporting classes (including development, mining, remediation works and closure activities) Activity DNRME reporting classes Primary task descriptions Code Development activities in Drilling activities including QMQ UG018 an underground mine hand held, air leg or rock Underground/development/drill/ machine drills – specifically long hole long hole drilling including pilot hole drilling activities Drilling activities including QMQ UG019 hand held, air leg or rock Underground/development/drill/ machine drills – specifically shaft sinking shaft sinking or raised bore drilling either underground or on the surface Drilling activities – specifically QMQ UG020 Underground/development/drill/ rock machine drilling including jumbo blast pattern drilling, meshing and cable bolting Underground/development/ Charge up, firing shot and post QMQ UG021 charge up blast clearance activities Ground control of the Spraying of shotcrete or QMQ UG022 underground mine Underground/ground fibrecrete - including the control/shotcrete agitator operator and spray mesh operator Underground/ground control/ Strata stabilisation using cable QMQ UG023 strata stabilisation bolting or injection Production activities - Bogging or loading of ore to QMQ UG024 Underground/production/loader extraction of target or rock truck, ore pass or crusher Haulage of material to QMQ UG025 Underground/production/truck underground stockpile or to surface run of mine (ROM) Underground/production/ring firer Production Shot firer QMQ UG026 Support of underground Refuelling or resupply QMQ UG027 Underground/services/refuel operations underground workers or plant Road watering, grading and QMQ UG028 Underground/services/water cart travel-ways maintenance Installation or repair of QMQ UG029 underground services including air and water lines, ventilation (ducting or Underground/services/installation secondary vent fans), undertaking mechanical repairs and vehicle servicing underground, electrical maintenance Underground not Underground/not otherwise Any other reporting classes not QMQ UG030 otherwise classified classified accounted for in underground operations Mineral mines and quarries (MMQ) reporting classes for occupational hygiene data – August 2018 2 Table 3 – Processing reporting classes (including mined or quarried material to material for removal from the mine site - including tailings) Activity DNRME reporting classes Primary task descriptions Code Crushing operation Processing/crushing Crushing operation including grizzly, QMQ P 031 plate crusher, cone crusher, SAG or ball mills) regardless of the presence of water or other media Removal of product Export/bagging Bagging QMQ P 032 from site – Export/truck-loading Truck load QMQ P 033 including handling Export/train-loading Train load QMQ P 034 material from Export/ship loading Ship load QMQ P 035 process plant to stockpile area, stockpile management and loading material onto transport Screening or Processing/dry processing/screening Mechanical screening - may use dust QMQ P 036 classification – dry suppression such as water or other media - including operation and routine inspection of screening, replacement of screens if conducted by operator/maintainers Shaping or cutting material/ore QMQ P 037 including sandstone operators, and Processing/dry processing/cutting any masonry works excludes cone crushers Size selection of material other than QMQ P 038 Processing/dry screening (dry cyclone - includes processing/classification operation and routine inspection) Screening or Processing/wet processing/solvent Solvent extraction QMQ P 039 classification - wet extraction Processing/wet processing/electro­ Electro-winning QMQ P 040 winning Processing/wet processing/carbon-in­ Carbon-in-pulp QMQ P 041 pulp Processing/wet processing/flotation Flotation QMQ P 042 Processing/wet processing/heap leach Heap leach QMQ P 043 Processing/wet processing/screening Screening QMQ P 044 Processing/wet processing/cutting Cutting QMQ P 045 Removal of water Removal of water from concentrate: QMQ P 046 from concentrate pressure or plate filters, dryers and Processing/dewatering spray dryer (not including tailing facility evaporators) Technical advisors Processing/technical/science and Technical advisors including science QMQ P 048 engineering and engineering roles-geologists, metallurgist, engineers, chemist and similar Processing/technical/laboratory/sampl Sample prep QMQ P 049 e prep Processing/technical/laboratory/analyst Analyst QMQ P 050 Processing not Processing/not otherwise classified Any other reporting classes not QMQ P 051 otherwise classified accounted for in processing Mineral mines and quarries (MMQ) reporting classes for occupational hygiene data – August 2018 3 Table 4 – MMQ – support of mining process reporting classes Activity DNRME reporting classes Primary task descriptions Code Office based roles Support/administration Office based roles including QMQ S 052 administration officers, weighbridge operator Support/technical/office Surface cleaners. QMQ S 053 Support/technical/field Stores, management, QMQ S 054 Exploration Support/resource Drilling to determine mineral reserve QMQ S 055 definition/surface including greenfield and brown field rig/reverse circulation exploration and in-field mapping Support/resource Drilling to determine mineral reserve QMQ S 056 definition/surface including greenfield and brown field rig/diamond exploration and in-field mapping Support/resource Drilling to determine mineral reserve QMQ S 057 definition/underground rig including greenfield and brown field exploration and in-field mapping Remediation/maintenance of Support/maintenance/ Remediation/maintenance of QMQ S 058 mechanical and electrical mobile plant/workshop mechanical and electrical equipment equipment Support/maintenance/ Remediation/maintenance of QMQ S 059 mobile plant/breakdown mechanical and electrical equipment including preventative and breakdown response for mobile plant Support/maintenance/fixed Fixed plant QMQ S 060 plant Support/maintenance/ Electrical plant, including electrician, QMQ S 061 electrical instrument tech, electrical engineer Support/maintenance/ Boiler maker QMQ S 062 boilermaker Support/maintenance/ Welder / workshop QMQ S 063 welder/workshop Support/maintenance/ Welder / field QMQ S 064 welder/field Supply and stores function Supply and stores function - including QMQ S 065 Support/logistics inward transport, internal stock movements and warehousing Cleaning activities of offices Cleaning activities of offices and QMQ S 066 and control rooms not plant Support/cleaners control rooms not plant area area On-site laundry On-site laundry of work clothes ­ QMQ S 067 Support/laundry including handling and consignment of clothing to off-site laundry Construction Support/construction/ Construction of building and offices QMQ S 068 buildings including building maintenance other than electrical works Support/construction/plant Construction of plant QMQ S 069 Demolition Support/demolition Demolition of building, offices or QMQ S 070 other structure including removal of asbestos containing materials (ACM) Back fill of surface and Support/fill/backfill Back fill of surface and underground QMQ S 071 underground voids and voids and excavations excavations excluding Support/fill/paste fill Back fill paste production QMQ S 072 loading material into ore- passes Support of mining process Support/not otherwise Any other reporting classes not QMQ S 073 not otherwise classified classified accounted for in support of mining process Mineral mines and quarries (MMQ) reporting classes for occupational hygiene data – August 2018 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Does Mechanical Screening of Contaminated
    This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited. pubs.acs.org/EF Article Does Mechanical Screening of Contaminated Forest Fuels Improve Ash Chemistry for Thermal Conversion? Marjan Bozaghian Backman,̈ Anna Strandberg, Mikael Thyrel, Dan Bergström, and Sylvia H. Larsson* Cite This: Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 16294−16301 Read Online ACCESS Metrics & More Article Recommendations *sı Supporting Information ABSTRACT: The effect of mechanical screening of severely contaminated forest fuel chips was investigated, focusing on main ash- forming elements and slagging tendency and other properties with relevance for thermal conversion. In this study, screening operations were performed according to practice on an industrial scale by combining a star screen and a supplementary windshifter in six different settings and combinations. Mechanical screening reduced the amount of ash and fine particles in the accept fraction. However, the mass losses for the different screening operations were substantial (20−50 wt %). Fuel analyses of the non-screened and the screened fuels showed that the most significant screening effect was a reduction of Si and Al, indicating an effective removal of sand and soil contaminations. However, the tested fuel’s main ash-forming element’s relative concentration did not indicate any improved combustion characteristics and ash-melting behavior. Samples of the accept fractions and non-screened material were combusted in a single-pellet thermogravimetric reactor, and the resulting ashes’ morphology and elemental composition were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy−energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry and the crystalline phases by powder X-ray diffraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Screening Guide for Radioactively Contaminated Sites
    United States Office of Air and Radiation EPA 402-R-96-017 Environmental Protection Office of Solid Waste and November 1996 Agency Emergency Response Washington, DC 20460 Technology Screening Guide for Radioactively Contaminated Sites EPA 402-R-96-017 November 1996 TECHNOLOGY SCREENING GUIDE FOR RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED SITES Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation Office of Radiation and Indoor Air Radiation Protection Division Center for Remediation Technology and Tools and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Prepared Under: Contract No. 68-D2-0156 DISCLAIMER Mention of trade names, products, or services does not convey, and should not be interpreted as conveying, official EPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation. iii ACKNOWEDGEMENTS Edward Feltcorn of ORIA’s Center for Remediation Technology and Tools was the EPA Work Assignment Manager for this guide. Assistance in production of this guide was provided by Jack Faucett Associates (Barry Riordan - Project Manager) under EPA Contract Number 68-D2-0156. EPA/ORIA wishes to thank the following individuals for their assistance and technical review comments on the drafts of this report: Doug Bell, EPA/ Superfund Dr. Walter Kovalick, Jr., EPA Technology Innovation Office Paul Giardina, EPA Region 2 Paul Leonard, EPA Region 3 Nancy Morlock, EPA Region 6 Linda Meyer, EPA Region 10 Ed Barth, EPA/ORD Cincinnati Gregg Dempsey, EPA/ORIA Las Vegas Facility Sam Windham and Samuel Keith, EPA/ORIA NAREL EPA/ORIA would like to extend special appreciation to Thomas Sorg of EPA/ORD Cincinnati, without his assistance the section on liquid media would have not been complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling an Aggregate Processing Unit. Case Study: Fornelo Processing Plant
    Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto DEPARTAMENTO DE ENGENHARIA GEOTÉCNICA Modelling an aggregate processing unit. Case study: Fornelo processing plant Daniel García de la Torre Fernández 2018 i ii Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto DEPARTAMENTO DE ENGENHARIA GEOTÉCNICA Modelling an aggregate processing unit. Case study: Fornelo processing plant Modelação de uma unidade de processamento de agregados. Caso de estudo: instalação de Fornelo Daniel García de la Torre Fernández 1170136 Projeto apresentado ao Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto para cumprimento dos requisitos necessários à obtenção do grau de Mestre em Engenharia Geotécnica e Geoambiente, realizada sob a orientação do Doutor José Augusto de Abreu Peixoto Fernandes, Professor Coordenador do Departamento de Engenharia Geotécnica do ISEP. iii iv Júri Presidente Doutor João Paulo Meixedo dos Santos Silva Professor Adjunto, Departamento de Engenharia Geotécnica, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto Doutor José Augusto de Abreu Peixoto Fernandes Professor Coordenador, Departamento de Engenharia Geotécnica, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto Mestre Luís Carlos Correia Ramos Director de Produção, Elevo Agregados (Grupo Elevo SA), Póvoa de Varzim Assistente convidado, Departamento de Engenharia Geotécnica, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto v A tese de mestrado em engenharia geotécnica e geoambiente (MEGG) foi apresentada e defendida em prova pública, pelo aluno Daniel García de La Torre Fernández, no Auditório de Geotecnia do Departamento de Engenharia Geotécnica (ISEP) em 26 de Novembro de 2018 mediante o júri nomeado, em que foi atribuída, por unanimidade, a classificação final de 16 (dezasseis) valores, cuja fundamentação se encontra em acta. Todas as correções pontuais determinadas pelo júri, e só essas, foram efectuadas.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximum Value Minerals Processing
    ⎪ Materials handling ⎪ Maximum value minerals processing MechChem Africa talks to Cedric Walstra, Glencore Technology’s Africa business development manager, who paints a broad picture of the high-recovery, high- efficiency processing equipment on offer from the technology side of Glencore’s business. joined Xstrata Technology about cost of grinding circuits. Intense grinding ten years ago, while Glencore was a is achieved using inert ceramic grinding “ shareholder, but Glencore took us over media that leads to improved metallurgical Iabout four years ago and the name performance compared with conventional was changed to Glencore Technology,” begins steel media. Walstra, adding that Glencore Technology “Anglo Platinium has some 26 IsaMills develops, markets and supports niche tech- currently in operation. These are horizontal nologies for the global mining and minerals fine grinding mills with cantilevered shaft and processing and metals’ extraction industries, eight grinding discs. Each mill is filled to 70 to “and not only for the mines owned by the 80% of capacity with ceramic grinding beads. Above: A Jameson flotation cell in operation at Lumwana in Zambia. The system offers the highest possible Glencore Group.” As the shaft rotates, the discs and beads cause throughput in a very small footprint, with froth washing maximising the concentrate grade in a single “Glencore Technology is a standalone attrition grinding,” Walstra explains. flotation stage. Left: IsaKidd Technology, shown here in use at the Kamoto Copper Company (KCC) in the company that partners with several tech- “Kidney shaped holes in the discs allow the DRC, is the global benchmark in copper electrowinning accounting for over 11 mtpa of copper production from over 100 licensees.
    [Show full text]
  • Glencore Technology Overview
    COMPANY OVERVIEW GLENCORE TECHNOLOGY Level 10, 160 Ann St Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4001 Tel. +61 7 3833 8500 Fax. +61 7 3833 8555 [email protected] www.glencoretechnology.com/ Glencore: Enhancing Processes in the Mining Industry Glencore Technology’s Chief Technology Officer Reinhardt Viljoen discusses the importance of collaboration in the mining industry and opens up about the importance of branding and marketing Written by: Robert Spence Produced by: Vince Kielty GLENCORE MINING ISASMELT and IsaKidd, which are slurry storage and leaching patented processes widely used in tanks that incorporates modular the smelting, electrowinning and components and mechanical joins copper refining industry today. to provide all the benefits of a Additional technologies include traditional welded tank, but with IsaMill, a fine and mainstream lower costs, reduced installation grinding technology, the Jameson times and far greater flexibility. Cell flotation technology and the “The tank is mechanically Albion Process leaching technology. bolted. Anyone with a minimal “We’ve initially developed amount of skill and supervision specific copper processing can bolt it together. Its scalability technology,” said Reinhardt makes it very exciting for clients Viljoen, Glencore Technology’s as it can accommodate most Chief Technology Officer. projects and even be reused for “However, we’re now also involved other projects.” IsaKidd robotic CSM in the broader design of smelters In addition, Glencore Technology and refineries and our technology has developed the HyperSparge™, s one of the largest Glencore Technology. Spawned is applicable to other base metals a proven and cost effective system Acommodity traders and from the merger with Xstrata, like zinc, lead, nickel, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliant Ventures SAC, Silver Standard Resources Inc., As the Operator Of
    Report to: Reliant Ventures S.A.C., Silver Standard Resources Inc., as the Operator of the San Luis Project Technical Report for the SAN LUIS PROJECT FEASIBILITY STUDY Ancash Department, Peru June 2010 Effective date: as of June 4, 2010 Prepared by the following Qualified Persons: Christopher Edward Kaye, MAusIMM Mine and Quarry Engineering Services Inc. Clinton Strachan, PE Montgomery Watson Harza Americas Inc. Steve L. Milne, P.E. Milne & Associates, Inc. Michael J. Lechner, P.Geo. Resource Modeling Inc. Donald F. Earnest, P.G. Resource Evaluation Inc. Robert Michael Robb, PE RR Engineering S AN L UIS P ROJECT R ELIANT V ENTURES S.A.C. IMPORTANT NOTICE This report was prepared as a National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report for Reliant Ventures S.A.C. and Silver Standard Resources Inc. by Mine and Quarry Engineering Services, Inc. (“MQes”), R&R Engineering, Milne & Associates, Resource Modeling Inc, Resource Evaluation Inc., and Montgomery Watson Harzag Americas Inc. (the Authors). The quality of information, conclusions, and estimates contained herein is consistent with the level of effort involved in the Authors’ services, based upon: (i) information available at the time of preparation, (ii) data supplied by outside sources, and (iii) the assumptions conditions, and qualifications set for the in this report. This report is intended to be used Reliant Ventures S.A.C. and Silver Standard Resources Inc. subject to the terms and conditions of its contracts with the Authors. These contracts permit Reliant Ventures S.A.C. and Silver Standard Resources Inc. to file this report as a Technical Report with Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities pursuant to provincial securities legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Isakidd™ – 2020 Compendium of Technical Papers Contents
    2020 Compendium of Technical Papers Long the benchmark in the industry, IsaKidd™ accounts for over 13.6 mtpa of copper production from over 116 licensees world wide, including Glencore’s own operations. We provide clients with a comprehensive range of technology, process support and core equipment to ensure long term operational and economic success.” IsaKidd™ at a Glance > IsaKidd™ Technology is focused on delivering quality products and services to its customers whilst continuously working on technical innovations and developments to address the ever changing needs of the market. > Since development and commercialisation in the early 1980s, both ISA and KIDD technologies have undergone continuous improvement and today are regarded as the benchmark technologies for high intensity copper electro-refining and electro-winning operations. > Significant advancements have been achieved with both the stainless steel cathode technology and the electrode handling equipment used in copper tankhouses. For more: [email protected] Tel +61 7 3833 8500 IsaKidd™ – 2020 Compendium of Technical Papers Contents Copper Refinery Modernisation, Mopani Copper Mines Plc, Mufulira, Zambia ................................................................................................................... 2 Mount Isa Mines Necessity Driving Innovation ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Current Distribution
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery of Critical and Other Raw Materials from Mining Waste and Landfills
    Recovery of critical and other raw materials from mining waste and landfills State of play on existing practices Blengini, G.A.; Mathieux, F.; Mancini, L.; Nyberg, M.; Viegas, H.M. (Editors) 2019 EUR 29744 EN This publication is a Science for Policy report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: Fabrice Mathieux Address: Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, ITALY Email: [email protected] Tel.: +39 332789238 EU Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC116131 EUR 29744 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-76-03391-2 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/494020 Print ISBN 978-92-76-03415-5 ISSN 1018-5593 doi:10.2760/700398 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 © European Union, 2019 The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). Reuse is authorised provided that the source of the document is acknowledged and its original meaning or message is not distorted. The European Commission shall not be liable for any consequence stemming from the reuse. For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not owned by the EU, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders.
    [Show full text]
  • ABANDONED MINE SITE CHARACTERIZATION and CLEANUP HANDBOOK Reply to Attn Of: ECL-117
    Region 8 Region 9 Region 10 EPA 910-B-00-001 Denver, CO San Francisco, CA Seattle, WA August 2000 ABANDONED MINE SITE CHARACTERIZATION and CLEANUP HANDBOOK Reply To Attn Of: ECL-117 Handbook Users: The Abandoned Mine Site Characterization and Cleanup Handbook (Handbook) is the result of the collective efforts and contributions of a number of individuals. During the earliest days of Handbook development, Mike Bishop of EPA Region 8 lead the effort to develop a Superfund Mine Waste Reference Document for EPA project managers working on mine site cleanup. That effort evolved into the Handbook in recognition of the many regulatory and non-regulatory mechanisms that are used today to manage the characterization and cleanup of mines sites. Users are encouraged to consider the information presented in the Handbook against the backdrop of site specific environmental and regulatory factors. The Handbook has been developed as a source of information and ideas for project managers involved in the characterization and cleanup of inactive mine sites. It is not guidance or policy. The list that follows acknowledges the efforts of writers, reviewers, editors, and other contributors that made development of the Handbook possible. It is always a bit risky to develop a list of contributors because it is inevitable that someone gets left out; to those we have neglected to acknowledge here we apologize. Nick Ceto Regional Mining Coordinator EPA Region 10 Seattle, Washington Shahid Mahmud OSWER EPA HQ Washington, D.C. Abandoned Mine Site Characterization
    [Show full text]
  • Presumptive Remedy for Metals-In-Soil Sites
    United States Office of EPA 540-F-98-054 Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and OSWER-9355.0-72FS Emergency Response PB99-963301 September 1999 Presumptive Remedy for Metals-in-Soil Sites DOE Office of Environmental and Policy Assistance (EH-41) EPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (Mail Code 5204-G) QuickQuick Reference Reference Guide Fact Sheet Since Superfund’s inception in 1980, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) remedial and removal programs have found that certain categories of sites have similar characteristics, such as the types of contaminants present, sources of contamination, or types of disposal practices. Based on the information acquired from evaluating and cleaning up these sites, the Superfund program has developed presumptive remedies to accelerate cleanups at certain categories of sites with common characteristics. This directive identifies a presumptive remedy for metals-in-soil sites, and summarizes technical factors (including limitations on the applicability of this directive) that should be considered when selecting a presumptive remedy for these sites. Development of this presumptive remedy has been a joint effort between the EPA and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). INTRODUCTION This presumptive remedy directive establishes preferred treatment technologies for metals-in-soil Presumptive remedies are preferred technologies or waste that is targeted for treatment, and containment response actions for sites with similar characteristics. for low-level risk waste requiring remediation. Use The selection of presumptive remedies is based on of this presumptive remedy should streamline remedy patterns of historical remedy selection practices, EPA selection for metals-in-soil sites by narrowing the scientific and engineering evaluation of performance universe of alternatives considered in the Feasibility data on remedy implementation, and EPA policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrometallurgy Applications
    Hydrometallurgy Applications Puromet™ and Purogold™ resins for metals removal, recovery and sequestration The uses and advantages of ion exchange resins for sorption and recovery of target metals. This Application guide presents information for using ion exchange technology for the primary recovery of metal or the removal of impurities to increase the value and purity of the final product. Metals can be extracted from ores using several methods including chemical solutions (hydrometallurgy), heat (pyrometallurgy) or mechanical means. Hydrometallurgy is the process of extracting metals from ores by dissolving the ore containing the metal of interest into an aqueous phase and recovering the metal from the resulting pregnant liquor. This process often provides the most cost-effective and environmentally friendly technique for extracting and concentrating different metals. Often, various hydrometallurgical processes are used in the same flowsheet, such as combining ion exchange and solvent extraction for the recovery and purification of uranium. Hydrometallurgical processes can also be combined with non-hydrometallurgical extractive metallurgy processes. Applications of ion exchange Ion exchange technology is used for the primary recovery of metal(s) of interest or the removal of specific impurities in order to increase the value and purity of the final product. A wide variety of process streams benefit from the application of ion exchange resins, as shown in Table 1. Table 1 – Applications of ion exchange in hydrometallurgy ORIGIN OF STREAM
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Processing Lab Manual
    Instructor Engr. Muhammad Shahzad (Assistant Professor) Mining Engineeering Department University of Engineering & Technology Lahore The practice of minerals processing is as old as human civilization. Minerals and products derived from minerals have formed our development cultures from the flints of the Stone Age man to the uranium ores of Atomic Age. METSO 3 Contents Section 1: CRUSHING Exp. # 1) “Machine Study of Laboratory Jaw Crusher and to perform a crushing test on the given sample, and to analyze the product for reduction ratio” Exp. # 2) “Machine Study of Laboratory Roll Crusher and to perform a crushing test on the given sample, and to analyze size distribution in the product by sieve analysis” Exp. # 3) “Machine Study of Laboratory Hammer Mill and to perform a crushing test on the given sample, and to analyze size distribution in the product by sieve analysis” Section 2: GRINDING Exp. # 4) “Machine Study of Laboratory Disc Mill and to perform a grinding test on the given sample, and to analyze size distribution in the product by sieve analysis” Exp. # 5) “Machine Study of Laboratory Rod Mill and to perform a grinding test on the given sample, and to analyze size distribution in the product by sieve analysis” Exp. # 6) “Machine Study of Denver Laboratory Ball Mill and to perform a grinding test on the given sample, and to analyze size distribution in the product by sieve analysis” Section 3: SIZING Exp. # 7) “Machine study of a double-deck vibratory screen & hummer electromagnetic screen and determining their performance by a screening test on the given sample”.
    [Show full text]