DOCSLIB.ORG

2002 Southern Division Spring Meeting, Little Rock, Arkansas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2002 Southern Division Spring Meeting, Little Rock, Arkansas 2002 SDAFS Midyear Abstracts MUSSEL SYMPOSIUM I .............................................................................................................. 6 Freshwater Bivalves (Unionoida): Distribution, Diversity and Extinction ................................. 6 Management and Recovery of Endangered Freshwater Mussels: Lessons from the Western Fanshell, Cyprogenia aberti ......................................................................................................... 6 Mussel Distributions in Lower Bayou Bartholemew, Morehouse Parish, LA ............................ 6 Reproductive Behavior and Population Dynamics of the Endangered Freshwater Mussel, Lampsilis streckeri (Frierson 1927), in the Middle Fork Little Red River, Arkansas ................. 7 Status of the Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis rafinesqueana), a Federal Candidate Species ............ 7 Reproduction and Propagation of the Neosho Mucket, Lampsilis rafinesqueana ...................... 8 MUSSEL SYMPOSIUM II ............................................................................................................ 9 Electronic Key for Identifying Arkansas Freshwater Mussel Species ........................................ 9 A Survey of Native Mussels in the Sac River System of Missouri ............................................. 9 Do Mussel Beds Attract Fishes in the Lower White River, Arkansas? ..................................... 10 The Effects Of Freshwater Mussel Filter Feeding On Seston And Microbial Biomass And Diversity from A Successful Mussel Refuge ............................................................................ 10 Longitudinal Distribution and Relative Abundance of Species within Mussel Aggregations of the White River and Ouachita River in Arkansas ..................................................................... 10 Development of a Geographic Information System (GIS) Database for Native Arkansas Mussels ...................................................................................................................................... 11 STREAM/RIVER MANAGEMENT I ......................................................................................... 12 Evaluation of Predation by Great Blue Herons as a Source of Trout Mortality on the Upper White River ............................................................................................................................... 12 A Survey of the Macroinvertebrates and Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) Feeding habits, Condition and Growth Within the Little Red River ................................................................................... 12 Rainbow Trout Stocking in an Ozark Stream: Trout Survival and Responses of Native Smallmouth Bass ....................................................................................................................... 13 Interaction for Food Resources between Native Fishes and Introduced Rainbow Trout in an Ozark Stream ............................................................................................................................. 13 Evaluation of a Tailwater Population of Flathead Catfish in Alabama ..................................... 13 The Effects of Streambank Restoration and Reduction of Cattle Access as a BMP on the South Fork of the Spring River, Arkansas ................................................................................. 14 STREAM/RIVER MANAGEMENT II ........................................................................................ 15 Turbidity and Ecological Integrity in Streams of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain Ecoregion: Is There a Relation? ....................................................................................................................... 15 A Basis for Regionalizing Stream Fisheries Management in Eastern Oklahoma ..................... 15 East-wide Watershed Assessment Protocol (EWAP) ................................................................ 16 Assessment Framework for Arkansas' Small Watersheds (< 80 Km2) using Aquatic Macroinvertebrates .................................................................................................................... 16 An Index of Biotic Integrity for Fish Assemblages in Wadeable Ozark Highland Streams of Arkansas .................................................................................................................................... 17 RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT I ................................................................................................ 18 1 Importance of Coarse Woody Debris as Littoral Fish Habitat in Three Carolina Reservoirs ... 18 Fish Populations Associated with Habitat-Enhanced Piers and Woody Debris in Piedmont Carolina Reservoirs ................................................................................................................... 18 Macroinvertebrate Distribution and Abundance in Hydrilla and Ceratophylum Habitats. ....... 18 Effects of Hydrilla Infestation and Management on the Food Habits of Age-0 Largemouth Bass Micropterus salmoides in the Atchafalaya Basin, Louisiana ............................................ 19 A Comparative Evaluation of Striped Bass Egg Production in the Major Tributaries of Lake Texoma ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Striped Bass Summer Daily Use Areas and Movements in a Southeastern Impoundment ...... 20 RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT II ............................................................................................... 21 Relations Between Zooplankton Availability and Age-0 Black Crappie Pomoxis nigromaculatus Abundance in Three Florida Lakes ................................................................. 21 Age, Growth and Food Habits of Blue Catfish in Lake Norman, North Carolina. ................... 21 Development of Mechanistic Models for Description of Larval Yellow Perch Predation Vulnerability in an Ecosystem-Specific Context ...................................................................... 21 Diet Analyses Of Double-Crested Cormorants and Largemouth Bass in Lake Chicot ............ 22 Identification Of Piscivore Prey Species Using Dichotomous Key Based On Prey Saggital Otoliths ...................................................................................................................................... 22 Feeding Behavior of Two Size Groups of Naïve (Pellet-Reared) and Wild Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) in a Laboratory Experiment ............................................................... 23 ANGLING AND ANGLERS I ..................................................................................................... 24 Recreational Specialization, Preferences, and Management Attitudes of Tennessee Tailwater Trout Anglers ............................................................................................................................. 24 Angler Demographics, Participation, and Attitudes Towards Recreational Fishing at Community-Fishing Ponds in Little Rock and Pine Bluff, Arkansas ....................................... 24 Effects of Young Anglers on Hybrid Bluegill ........................................................................... 25 Angling Susceptibility of Spotted Bass in the Buttahatchee River, Mississippi ....................... 25 Populations Characteristics of Riverine Smallmouth Bass in Tennessee and Simulated Effects of Length Limits ........................................................................................................................ 25 A Case History of Salmonid Fishing Regulations in Great Smoky Mountains National Park: 1934-2001 .................................................................................................................................. 26 Net Value of Trout Fishing Opportunities in the Clinch River, Tennessee .............................. 26 Evaluating Fishing Effort and Harvest of Flathead Catfish in Lake Carl Blackwell, OK ........ 27 Angler Exploitation and Size Preferences of Flathead Catfish in the Missouri River: Initial Steps at Beginning to Manage for High Quality Fisheries ........................................................ 27 An Evaluation of the Hooked On Fishing – Not On Drugs Program in Arkansas .................... 28 Evaluating the Success of Youth Fishing Outreach Events at Recruiting License Buyers using a Point-of-Sale System in Texas ................................................................................................ 28 HABITAT AND LAND USE ....................................................................................................... 30 Relationship Between Land Use and Stream Fish Assemblage Structure at Multiple Spatial Scales in Two Ecoregions of Arkansas ..................................................................................... 30 Fish and Habitat Diversity in the Bayou DeLoutre Watershed ................................................. 30 Habitat Associations and Demographics of the Endangered Roanoke Logperch in Three Virginia Rivers: Implications for Conservation ........................................................................ 31 2 Distributions of Fishes of the New River National Gorge, West Virginia, Following Major Flood Events .............................................................................................................................. 31 Longitudinal Patterns of Community Structure for Stream Fishes in a Virginia Tailwater ...... 32
Load more

Recommended publications
  • December 2015
    Ellipsaria Vol. 17 - No. 4 December 2015 Newsletter of the Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society Volume 17 – Number 4 December 2015 Cover Story . 1 Society News . 5 Regional Meetings . 9 Upcoming Meetings . 14 Contributed Articles . 15 Obituary . 28 Lyubov Burlakova, Knut Mehler, Alexander Karatayev, and Manuel Lopes-Lima FMCS Officers . 33 On October 4-8, 2015, the Great Lakes Center of Buffalo State College hosted the Second International Meeting on Biology and Conservation of Freshwater Committee Chairs Bivalves. This meeting brought together over 80 scientists from 19 countries on four continents (Europe, and Co-chairs . 34 North America, South America, and Australia). Representation from the United States was rather low, Parting Shot . 35 but that was expected, as several other meetings on freshwater molluscs were held in the USA earlier in the year. Ellipsaria Vol. 17 - No. 4 December 2015 The First International Meeting on Biology and Conservation of Freshwater Bivalves was held in Bragança, Portugal, in 2012. That meeting was organized by Manuel Lopes-Lima and his colleagues from several academic institutions in Portugal. In addition to being a research scientist with the University of Porto, Portugal, Manuel is the IUCN Coordinator of the Red List Authority on Freshwater Bivalves. The goal of the first meeting was to create a network of international experts in biology and conservation of freshwater bivalves to develop collaborative projects and global directives for their protection and conservation. The Bragança meeting was very productive in uniting freshwater mussel biologists from European countries with their colleagues in North and South America. The meeting format did not include concurrent sessions, which allowed everyone to attend to every talk and all of the plenary talks by leading scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior
    Vol. 76 Thursday, No. 194 October 6, 2011 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a Petition To List Texas Fatmucket, Golden Orb, Smooth Pimpleback, Texas Pimpleback, and Texas Fawnsfoot as Threatened or Endangered; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:27 Oct 05, 2011 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\06OCP2.SGM 06OCP2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 62166 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 194 / Thursday, October 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary additional mussels from eastern Texas, Mowad, Texas State Administrator, U.S. the Texas heelsplitter (Potamilus Fish and Wildlife Service Fish and Wildlife Service (see amphichaenus) and Salina mucket (P. ADDRESSES); by telephone at 512–927– metnecktayi), were also included in this 50 CFR Part 17 3557; or by facsimile at 512–927–3592. petition. The petition incorporated all If you use a telecommunications device analyses, references, and documentation [FWS–R2–ES–2011–0079; MO 92210–0–0008 for the deaf (TDD), please call the provided by NatureServe in its online B2] Federal Information Relay Service database at http://www.natureserve.org/ Endangered and Threatened Wildlife (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. into the petition. Included in and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NatureServe was supporting information regarding the species’ Petition To List Texas Fatmucket, Background Golden Orb, Smooth Pimpleback, taxonomy and ecology, historical and Texas Pimpleback, and Texas Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act (16 current distribution, present status, and Fawnsfoot as Threatened or U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Mollusca: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in Arkansas John L
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 51 Article 12 1997 Revised Status of Rare and Endangered Unionaea (Mollusca: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in Arkansas John L. Harris Arkansas State University, [email protected] Peter J. Rust Arkansas State University Alan D. Christian Arkansas State University William R. Posey II Arkansas State University Chris L. Davidson Arkansas State University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Harris, John L.; Rust, Peter J.; Christian, Alan D.; Posey, William R. II; Davidson, Chris L.; and Harp, George L. (1997) "Revised Status of Rare and Endangered Unionaea (Mollusca: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 51 , Article 12. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol51/iss1/12 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Revised Status of Rare and Endangered Unionaea (Mollusca: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in Arkansas Authors John L.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Biological Report Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis Rafinesqueana)
    Species Biological Report Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis rafinesqueana) Cover photo: Dr. Chris Barnhart (Missouri State University) Prepared by: The Neosho Mucket Recovery Team This species biological report informs the Draft Recovery Plan for the Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis rafinesqueana) (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2017). The Species Biological Report is a comprehensive biological status review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for the Neosho Mucket and provides an account of species overall viability. A Recovery Implementation Strategy, which provides the expanded narrative for the recovery activities and the implementation schedule, is available at https://www.fws.gov/arkansas-es/. The Recovery Implementation Strategy and Species Biological Report are finalized separately from the Recovery Plan and will be updated on a routine basis. Executive Summary The Neosho Mucket is a freshwater mussel endemic to the Illinois, Neosho, and Verdigris River basins in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma. It is associated with shallow riffles and runs comprising gravel substrate and moderate to swift currents, but prefers near-shore areas or areas out of the main current in Shoal Creek and Illinois River. It does not occur in reservoirs lacking riverine characteristics. The life-history traits and habitat requirements of the Neosho Mucket make it extremely susceptible to environmental change (e.g., droughts, sedimentation, chemical contaminants). Mechanisms leading to the decline of Neosho Mucket range from local (e.g., riparian clearing, chemical contaminants, etc.), to regional influences (e.g., altered flow regimes, channelization, etc.), to global climate change. The synergistic (interaction of two or more components) effects of threats are often complex in aquatic environments, making it difficult to predict changes in mussel and fish host(s) distribution, abundance, and habitat availability that may result from these effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Implementation Strategy Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis
    Recovery Implementation Strategy Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis rafinesqueana) Courtesy of Dr. Chris Barnhart (Missouri State University) Prepared by: The Neosho Mucket Recovery Team This Recovery Implementation Strategy describes the activities to implement the recovery actions identified in the Draft Recovery Plan for the Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis rafinesqueana) (Service 2017). The strategy provides a narrative and the implementation schedule for the Neosho Mucket recovery activities. The implementation schedule estimates the cost for implementing recovery activities for removal from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife (delisting). Additionally, the strategy document restates the criteria for determining when the Neosho Mucket should be considered for delisting. A Species Biological Report, which provides information on the species’ biology and status and a brief discussion of factors limiting its populations, is available at http://www.fws.gov/arkansas-es. The Recovery Implementation Strategy and Species Biological Report are finalized separately from the Recovery Plan and will be updated on a routine basis. Recovery Strategy The primary strategy for recovery of Neosho Mucket is to conserve the range of genetic and morphological diversity of the species across its historical range; fully quantify population demographics and status within each river; improve population size and viability within each river; reduce threats adversely affecting the species within each river (e.g., habitat degradation from sedimentation, chemical contaminants, channel destabilization, water diversion); emphasize voluntary soil and water stewardship practices by citizens living and working within each watershed; and potentially use captive propagation to prevent local extirpation where recruitment failure is occurring and for reintroduction within rivers historically occupied by Neosho Mucket.
    [Show full text]
  • Programmatic Biological Assessment And
    PROGRAMMATIC BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AND PROGRAMMTIC BIOLOGICAL OPINION FOR THE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE’S ARKANSAS HEALTHY FOREST RESERVE PROGRAM Written by U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arkansas Ecological Services Field Office and Natural Resources Conservation Service Arkansas State Office August 25, 2006 Introduction This represents the United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) programmatic biological opinion (PBO) regarding the Healthy Forest Reserve Program (HFRP) in Arkansas. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and the Service have jointly agreed to a streamlined consultation process whereby a biological assessment and biological opinion are jointly developed. Therefore, this document serves as the NRCS’ biological assessment and the Service’s biological opinion of the proposed HFRP and potential impacts to the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Geocarpon minimum (no common name), pondberry (Lindera melissifolia), pink mucket (Lampsilis abrupta), winged mapleleaf (Quadrula fragosa), and Ouachita rock-pocketbook (Arkansia wheeleri) from activities associated with this program. The purpose of this PBA/PBO is to expedite consultations on proposed HFRP activities. This consultation document has been prepared pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (Act) (16 United States Code [U.S.C.] 1531 et seq.) and 50 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] §402 of our interagency regulations governing section 7 of the ESA. Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA requires federal agencies to consult with the Service to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any federally listed species nor destroy or adversely modify critical habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Hosts and Culture of Mussel Species of Special Concern: Annual Report for 1999
    Fish Hosts and Culture of Mussel Species of Special Concern: Annual Report for 1999 Date prepared: February 28, 2000 Submitted to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Missouri Ecological Services Field Office 608 East Cherry Street Columbia, MO 65201 and Natural History Section Missouri Department of Conservation P.O. Box 180 Jefferson City, MO 65102 Submitted by: M. Christopher Barnhart and Michael S. Baird Department of Biology Southwest Missouri State University 901 S. National Springfield, Missouri 65804 Telephone: 417-836-5166 FAX: 417-836-6934 E-mail: [email protected] 2 SUMMARY This report describes results of the second year of a 3-year investigation of reproductive biology of freshwater mussels (unionoids). At least 21 North American unionoids are already extinct and 69 species are federally classified as endangered (Williams et al. 1993, Neves et al. 1997). The purpose of this project is to provide information that will facilitate conservation and management of these unique organisms. Parasitism of larval unionoids on fish is a central feature of their biology. Knowledge of the host fish and the requirements of the juvenile life stages are prerequisite for propagation and restoration of endangered species. Therefore, we are attempting to identify fish hosts and key reproductive behaviors and to investigate the biology of cultured juveniles. During the past year we investigated hosts of four mussel species. Laboratory host tests with spectaclecase (Cumberlandia monodonta) on 26 potential host species were all negative. Examination of natural infestations of glochidia on fish revealed a few Cumberlandia glochidia on bigeye chub (Notropis amblops) and a single glochidium on shorthead redhorse (Moxostoma macrolepidotum).
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas' Federally Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Species
    Arkansas’ Federally Endangered, Threatened, and Candidate Species Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens) – Gray bats have long, glossy, light to dark brown fur, distinguishing them from other bat species. Gray bats inhabit caves year round. In the winter they hibernate in deep vertical caves found in the karst region of the southeastern US. During the summer they roost in caves near rivers so they have access to prey. They eat flying aquatic and terrestrial insects. They do not inhabit barns and houses. Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis ) – The Indiana bat is a small relative of the gray bat. Their fur is dark-brown to black. They occur in the Ozark, Boston, and Ouachita Mountain region of Arkansas. Indiana bats hibernate in large numbers in only a few caves, making them vulnerable to disturbance. Females may roost in groups up to 100 bats or more, during the summer, under the loose bark of trees. They forage along the forest edge, preying on flying insects. They can eat up to half their body weight in insects each night. Cave and forest habitat destruction and modification were the primary threats that led to this species endangered status. Hibernating bats are dying in record numbers due to a new wildlife health crisis called white-nose syndrome. The affliction was first documented in New York during the winter of 2006-2007 and is rapidly spreading across the eastern US and afflicting numerous bat species, including the Indiana bat. It has not been documented in Arkansas yet, but could affect our bat populations within a couple of years. To learn more about white-nose syndrome go to http://www.fws.gov/arkansas-es/esday.html Ozark Big-eared Bat (Corynorhinus townsendii ingens) – The Ozark big-eared bat is a medium sized bat, with reddish fur, very large ears, and a prominent snout.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arkansas Field Office Threatened
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arkansas Field Office Threatened and Endangered Species Geographic Ranges & Life History Summaries January 2014 1 Table of Contents American Burying Beetle ........................................................................................................... 4 Arkansas Darter .......................................................................................................................... 5 Arkansas Fatmucket .................................................................................................................... 6 Bald Eagle ................................................................................................................................... 7 Benton County Cave Crayfish .................................................................................................... 8 Curtis Pearlymussel .................................................................................................................... 9 Fanshell ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Fat Pocketbook.......................................................................................................................... 11 Geocarpon ................................................................................................................................. 12 Gray Bat ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Status Survey of the Western Fanshell and the Neosho Mucket in Oklahoma
    1990 c.3 OKLAHOMA <) PROJECT TITLE: STATUS SURVEY OF THE WESTERN FANSHELL AND THE NEOSHO MUCKET IN OKLAHOMA To determine the distribution and abundance of the freshwater mussels Cyprogenia aberti (Conrad) and Lampsilis rafinesqueana Frierson in Oklahoma. A survey to determine the status of the freshwater mussels, Cyprogenia aberti (Conrad) and Lampsilis rafinesqueana Frierson, in Oklahoma was completed during August and September, 1989. These species are also known by the common names of Western Fanshell and Neosho Mucket, respectively. The western fanshell is probably extinct in the state. It is known that the species formerly occurred in the Verdigris River in Oklahoma and as a result of this study, was determined that it had also existed in the Caney River. However, no evidence of living or fresh specimens was found in any river system in northeastern Oklahoma. The Neosho mucket has also disappeared from most of its former range within the state and presently only occurs in a segment of the Illinois River system extending from the Lake Frances dam near the Arkansas border to Lake Tenkiller. Protection for this species is recommended. This report describes efforts to determine the status of two species of freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) in Oklahoma. Both species are generally considered to be rare and have rather limited geographical distributions. Both species may meet the criteria of endangered species and thus it was considered important to gain some information as to their current status. Both species have been recorded in Oklahoma but their current abundance and distribution in the state were unknown. The western fanshell, Cyprogenia aberti (Conrad) was described in 1850 from specimens collected on the rapids of the Verdigris River, Chambers' Ford, Oklahoma (Johnson, 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Status of Rare and Endangered Mussels (Mollusca: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in Arkansas John L
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 41 Article 15 1987 Distribution and Status of Rare and Endangered Mussels (Mollusca: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in Arkansas John L. Harris Arkansas Highway & Transportation Department, [email protected] Mark E. Gordon Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Harris, John L. and Gordon, Mark E. (1987) "Distribution and Status of Rare and Endangered Mussels (Mollusca: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 41 , Article 15. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol41/iss1/15 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 41 [1987], Art. 15 DISTRIBUTION AND STATUS OF RARE AND ENDANGERED MUSSELS (MOLLUSCA: MARGARITIFERIDAE, UNIONIDAE) IN ARKANSAS JOHN L. HARRIS Environmental Division Arkansas Highway & Transportation Department P.O. Box 2261 Little Rock, AR 72203 MARKE. GORDON 304 North Willow, Apt. A Fayetteville, AR 72701 ABSTRACT Knowledge of the distribution and population status of freshwater bivalves occurring in Arkansas has increased markedly during the past decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Report for the Purple Lilliput (Toxolasma Lividum)
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Purple Lilliput (Toxolasma lividum) Photo credit: The Mussel Project February 2020 Version 1.0 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service South Atlantic-Gulf Atlanta, GA Primary Contributors • Andrew Henderson - Asheville Field Office, Lead Biologist (Legacy Region 4) • Heidi Crowell - Pacific Southwest Regional Office, SAT Project Manager (Legacy Region 8) • Gary Peeples - Asheville Field Office (Legacy Region 4) • Josh Hundley - Missouri Field Office (Legacy Region 3) • David Martinez - Oklahoma Field Office (Legacy Region 2) Peer Reviewer • Dr. Wendell Haag (U.S. Forest Service) Contributors & Partner Agency Reviewers (underlined) • Rose Agbalog, Angela Boyer, Bob Butler (retired), Stephanie Chance, Chris Davidson, Andy Ford, Leroy Koch (retired) (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service) • Chuck Howard, Tim Keeling (Tennessee Valley Authority) • Kendall Moles (Arkansas Game and Fish Commission) • Peter Badra, Rebecca Rogers (Michigan Natural Features Inventory) • Stephanie Williams (Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation) • Jeff Grabarkiewicz (Michigan Department of Transportation) • Dr. Arthur Bogan, Jamie Smith (North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences) • Jeremy Tiemann, Rachel Vinsel, Kevin Cummings (Illinois Natural History Survey) • Heidi Dunn, Emily Grossman (Ecological Specialists, Inc.) • Brian Watson, Karen Horodysky (Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries) • Dr. Paul Johnson, Jeff Garner, Michael Buntin, Todd Fobian, Ashley Peters (Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources)
    [Show full text]