DOCSLIB.ORG

I Insurance & Banking Focus Section I Insurance and Banking

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I Insurance & Banking Focus Section I Insurance and Banking Insurance & Banking Focus Section I Insurance and Banking .............................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 Insurance Sales in Banks ................................................................... 1 Overview .................................................................................................................. 1 National Bank Insurance Powers ............................................................................. 2 Applicability of State Laws ....................................................................................... 2 BARNETT BANK OF MARION COUNTY v. NELSON, ___ U.S. ___ (1996) ....... 3 Insurance Law as Relevant to Financial Institutions and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ............................................................................................................................ 4 I. The Barnett Bank Case, Including its Supporting Rationale, Defines when a State Law is Preempted. ................................................................................................... 5 II. The GLBA Codified the Barnett Bank Decision in its Entirety. ............................. 5 III. Federal Courts have Accepted a Broad Reading of Barnett Bank. ..................... 7 IV. Since Passage of GLBA, the States have been on Notice that Their Bank- Insurance Sales Laws are Subject to Preemption Under Barnett Bank and GLBA. 7 Summary .................................................................................................................. 8 CHAPTER 2 State Regulation and Safe Harbors ................................................... 9 State Regulation Safe Harbors ................................................................................ 9 Permissible National Bank Insurance Activities ....................................................... 9 Insurance Activities as Agent.............................................................................. 10 Insurance Activities as Principal ......................................................................... 10 Insurance Activities as Finder ............................................................................. 11 Bank Structures for National Bank Insurance Activities ......................................... 11 Bank Direct Sales ............................................................................................... 11 Investment in an Insurance Entity ....................................................................... 11 Operating Subsidiary .......................................................................................... 12 Financial Subsidiary ........................................................................................... 12 Non-controlling Investment ................................................................................. 12 Holding Company Affiliate .................................................................................. 12 Arrangements with Unaffiliated Third Parties ......................................................... 13 Distribution Methods .............................................................................................. 13 Agency Activities and the Role of the Insurance Agent ...................................... 13 Managing General Agency (MGA) and the Role of an MGA .............................. 14 Finders Activities and the Role of the Finder ...................................................... 14 Reinsurance and the Role of the Reinsurer ........................................................ 14 Regulation and Supervision ................................................................................... 14 Functionally Regulated Activities ............................................................................ 15 OCC Limits ......................................................................................................... 16 Regulatory Risk Assessment ................................................................................. 16 Applicable Legal and Regulatory Requirements .................................................... 17 Insurance Customer Protections - 12 CFR 14 .................................................... 17 Privacy Rule - 12 CFR 40 and the Fair Credit Reporting Act .............................. 17 Consumer Reporting Agency.............................................................................. 18 Federal Prohibitions on Tying - 12 USC 1972 .................................................... 18 Restrictions on Transactions with Affiliates - 12 USC 371c, 371c-1 ................... 18 Advisory Letter 96-8, “Guidance on Insurance and Annuity Sales Activities” ..... 19 i Risks ...................................................................................................................... 19 Transaction Risk ................................................................................................. 20 Compliance Risk ................................................................................................. 20 Significance of Complaints .............................................................................. 20 Strategic Risk ..................................................................................................... 21 Culture Club .................................................................................................... 21 Reputation Risk .................................................................................................. 21 High Anxiety .................................................................................................... 22 Credit Risk .......................................................................................................... 22 CHAPTER 3 Risk Management Processes .......................................................... 22 Program Management Plan ................................................................................... 23 Bank Risk Assessment .......................................................................................... 23 Risk Identification ............................................................................................... 24 Risk Measurement ................................................................................................. 24 Risk Monitoring ................................................................................................... 24 Risk Controls .......................................................................................................... 24 Adequate Policies and Procedures ..................................................................... 25 Effective Due Diligence Processes ..................................................................... 25 Processes for Identification and Selection of Third Parties ................................. 25 Guidelines for Written Contracts ......................................................................... 26 Guidelines for Qualifications and Training .......................................................... 27 Guidelines to Prevent Inappropriate Recommendations or Sales ...................... 28 Appropriate Employee Compensation Programs ................................................ 28 Risk Monitoring ...................................................................................................... 29 Ongoing Oversight of Third-Party Relationships................................................. 29 Customer Complaints ......................................................................................... 30 Compliance and Audit Programs ........................................................................ 30 CHAPTER 4 Insurance and Risk Review .............................................................. 31 RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS ........................................................................... 31 Direct Examination of FRA’s ............................................................................... 32 Insurance Activities and FRA’s .............................................................................. 32 Preliminary Risk Assessment ................................................................................. 32 Additional Risk Assessment ................................................................................... 34 Quantity of Risk Assessment: Transaction Risk ..................................................... 35 Compliance Risk .................................................................................................... 36 Strategic Risk ......................................................................................................... 36 Reputation Risk ...................................................................................................... 37 Credit Risk ............................................................................................................. 38 Quality of Risk Management Assessment Policy ................................................... 39 Personnel practices. ........................................................................................... 40 Processes .............................................................................................................. 40 Personnel: Insurance ............................................................................................. 41 Control Systems: Insurance Activities .................................................................... 42 Risk Assessment of Insurance Activities;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Operation of Savings-Bank Life Insurance in Massachusetts and New York
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Frances Perkins, Secretary BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS Isador Lubin, Commissioner (on leave) A . F. Hinrichs, Acting Commissioner + Operation of Savings-Bank Life Insurance in Massachusetts and New York Revision of Bulletin No. 615: The Massachusetts System of Savings-Bank Life Insurance, by Edward Berman ♦ Bulletin 7s[o. 688 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1941 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 20 cents Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR F rances P er k ins, S e c r e t a r y + BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS I s a d o r L tjbin, Commissioner (o n lea v e) A. F. H in r ic h s , Acting Commissioner Donald Davenport, Chief, Employ­ Aryness Joy, Chief, Prices and Cost of ment and Occupational Outlook Living Branch Branch N. Arnold Tolies, Chief, Working Con­ Henry J. Fitzgerald, Chief, Business ditions and Industrial Relations Management Branch Branch Hugh S. Hanna, Chief, Editorial and Research Sidney W. Wilcox, Chief Statistician CHIEFS OF DIVISIONS Herman B. Byer, Construction and Charles F. Sharkey, Labor Law In­ Public Employment formation J. M. Cutts, Wholesale Prices Boris Stern, Labor Information Ser­ W. Duane Evans, Productivity and vice Technological Developments Stella Stewart, Retail Prices Swen Kjaer, Industrial Accidents John J. Mahanev, Machine Tabula­ Lewis E. Talbert, Employment Sta­ tion tistics Robert J. Myers, Wage and Hour Emmett H. Welch, Occupational Out­ Statistics look Florence Peterson, Industrial Rela­ tions Faith M. Williams, Cost of Living i i Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Banking & Finance
    December 5, 2011 Banking & Finance passage of the NBA and the creation of the OCC resulted in a “dual National Banks banking system,” in which federally-chartered banks operate in one system governed by one set of regulations at the national level and state-chartered banks operate in parallel systems subject to Federal Preemption laws and regulations at the state level. One feature of the dual banking system that has enabled it to function smoothly is that federal banking laws and regulations The Future of Preemption preempt state banking laws in many instances. Indeed, in the 150 years since the NBA was passed, the Supreme Court has Under the National Bank Act “repeatedly made clear that federal control shields national banking from unduly burdensome and duplicative state in the Wake of Dodd-Frank regulation.”5 Proponents of preemption in this context have always argued that the national banking system is essential to the development of multi-state markets for products, thus promoting economic prosperity and growth.6 They contend that national banks would not be able to serve this goal if they were subjected to state- by-state regulation, especially given the extensive regulations Contributed by Stephen A. Fogdall and Christopher A. established by the NBA and the OCC.7 Reese, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP For years, national banks received the benefit of federal regulations granting them immunity from any “state laws that The Barnett Bank Preemption Standard obstruct, impair, or condition a national bank’s ability to fully Supreme Court case law generally recognizes three forms of exercise its powers to conduct activities authorized under Federal preemption: express preemption, field preemption, and conflict 1 law.” The passage of the Dodd-Frank Act has invalidated these preemption.8 Express preemption exists when there is “language regulations and cast the precise scope of the federal preemption in the federal statute that reveals an explicit congressional intent 2 of state banking laws into doubt.
    [Show full text]
  • Barnett Bank Brings the Business of Insurance to the Attention of Congress
    University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review Volume 20 Issue 1 Article 4 1997 Barnett Bank Brings the Business of Insurance to the Attention of Congress Jeffrey H. Thomas Follow this and additional works at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview Part of the Banking and Finance Law Commons, and the Insurance Law Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey H. Thomas, Barnett Bank Brings the Business of Insurance to the Attention of Congress, 20 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 129 (1997). Available at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview/vol20/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review by an authorized editor of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BARNETT BANK BRINGS THE BUSINESS OF INSURANCE TO THE ATTENTION OF CONGRESS Jeffrey H. Thomas* I. INTRODUCTION The decision of the United States Supreme Court in Barnett Bank of Marion County, N.A. v. Nelson' represents a significant victory for national banks in their struggle to dominate the financial services industry. Since winning a series of decisions which upheld Federal Reserve Board determina- tions that banks, bank holding companies, and their affiliates could engage in certain securities activities,2 banks have focused intently on the marketing and sale of insurance products. Encouraged by the Comptroller of the Currency and the Supreme Court3 and fueled by an increasing appetite for additional fee income,4 national banks have proved themselves to be powerful engines for marketing and selling of annuities.5 In fact, since banks have entered the annuities market over the past two years, variable annuities have become one of the most popular investment vehicles.6 * B.A., University of Arkansas (1984); J.D., University of Arkansas (1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Banking
    Sound Banking Sound Banking Rebecca Söderström Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Auditorium Minus, Gustavianum, Akademigatan 3, Uppsala, Friday, 12 May 2017 at 10:15 for the degree of Doctor of Laws. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Professor Nina Dietz Legind. Abstract Söderström, R. 2017. Sound Banking. 370 pp. Uppsala: Juridiska fakulteten, Uppsala universitet. ISBN 978-91-506-2627-8. Banks are subject to a comprehensive body of legal rules and conduct their business under constant supervision of authorities. Since the financial crisis of 2008, the number of rules governing banking has grown and the structures of supervision have likewise been enhanced. This thesis analyses various aspects of the regulation and supervision of banks, and focuses especially on soundness as a normative concept to regulate banks. Soundness is a legal prerequisite in, for example Swedish, law and appears in relation to banking in many other jurisdictions. The aims of this thesis are to examine how the normative concept of soundness functions in the regulation and supervision of banks, to present general insights into how banking regulation and supervision function and how the financial crisis of 2008 has affected banking regulation and supervision. The thesis proposes a taxonomy of soundness – confidence – stability to describe the normative context of soundness. The taxonomy is connected to the theoretical arguments for bank regulation and is used as a tool to analyse three areas of banking regulation: authorisation, capital requirements and banks in trauma. The three areas correspond to the outline of the thesis according to The Story of the Bank, which includes the formation, operation and failure of banks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2581, Effective January 12, 1984
    In The Matter of the Petition of "M" Bank, A Mutual Savings Bank and the "O" Bank for a Declaratory Ruling DOC #2581, Effective January 12, 1984 Pursuant to RSA 541-A:1, IV, RSA 541-A:2, I (d) and Rev 104.04, New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules the "M" Bank, a Mutual Savings Bank (hereinafter referred to as "Bank") and "O" Bank (hereinafter referred to as "Holding Company") a business corporation organized and existing pursuant to RSA 293-A with its principal place of business in .............., N. H., petition the Department of Revenue Administration for a declaratory ruling with respect to the New Hampshire tax consequences of the conversion of the "M" Bank, a Mutual Savings Bank, from mutual to stock form, as a subsidiary of "O" Bank of ..............., New Hampshire. Through its attorneys-in-fact, the Petitioners represent the following: The purpose of the Plan of Conversion is to accomplish (a) the conversion of a mutual savings bank to a "guaranty" (stock) savings bank subsidiary of Holding Company, and (b) the sale of stock of Holding Company to Bank depositors and other classes of potential subscribers, by a procedure similar to that established by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board ("FHLBB") for conversions of federally chartered mutual thrift institutions to stock forms. Pursuant to New Hampshire RSA 386:10 (II), these procedures and regulations have also been adopted by the New Hampshire General Court (Legislature) and Banking Commissioner for use with respect to conversion of state-chartered mutual savings banks to stock banks. On September 14, 1983 the Board of Directors of Bank adopted a Plan of Conversion (hereinafter referred to as "Plan") whereby Bank will be converted to a guaranty (stock) savings bank (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "Stock Bank" to distinguish the same from the Bank prior to conversion) all of the stock of which will be held by Holding Company.
    [Show full text]
  • CRA Decision #94 June 1999
    Comptroller of the Currency Administrator of National Banks Washington, D.C. CRA Decision #94 June 1999 DECISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY ON THE APPLICATION TO MERGE BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, AND NATIONSBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA May 20, 1999 _____________________________________________________________________________ I. INTRODUCTION On December 28, 1998, Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association (“BANTSA”), San Francisco, California, and NationsBank, National Association, Charlotte, North Carolina (“NationsBank”), applied to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") for approval to merge NationsBank with and into BANTSA under BANTSA’s charter under 12 U.S.C. §§ 215a-1, 1828(c) and 1831u (the “Merger”). The resulting bank will be named “Bank of America, National Association” (“BofA-Resulting”) and will have its main office in Charlotte, North Carolina.1 Both banks are insured banks. BANTSA has its main office in California and, at the proposed consummation date for the Merger, will operate branches in California, Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Illinois, New York, and Florida.2 NationsBank has its main office in North Carolina and operates branches in North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, Illinois, 1 This application is part of the process of combining the banking operations of the subsidiary banks of the recently formed Bank of America Corporation (“New BAC”). NationsBank Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina, merged with the former BankAmerica Corporation (“BankAmerica”), San Francisco, California. The resulting holding company is named Bank of America Corporation and is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT FLORIDA BANK March 19, 2010 to the SHAREHOLDERS
    GREAT FLORIDA BANK March 19, 2010 TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF GREAT FLORIDA BANK You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Great Florida Bank which will be held at the main office of the Bank at 15050 N.W. 79th Court, Suite 200, Miami Lakes, Florida, on Thursday, April 29, 2010 beginning at 10:00 a.m. At the Annual Meeting you will be asked to consider and vote upon the reelection of the directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Shareholders also will consider and vote upon such other or further business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. We hope you can attend the meeting and vote your shares in person. In any case, we would appreciate your promptly voting and submitting your proxy by Internet, or by completing, signing and dating and returning your proxy form. This action will ensure that your preferences will be expressed on the matters that are being considered. If you are able to attend the meeting, you may vote your shares in person. We want to thank you for your support during the past year. If you have any questions about the Proxy Statement, please do not hesitate to call us. Sincerely, M. Mehdi Ghomeshi President and Chief Executive Officer GREAT FLORIDA BANK NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 29, 2010 Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Great Florida Bank (the “Bank”) will be held at the main office of the Bank at 15050 N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance Times: MASS. BANKS TRIED HOLDING COMPANY ROUTE BEFORE INSURER LIBERTY MUTUAL December 11, 2001, Vol. XX No. 25 Giant
    Insurance Times: MASS. BANKS TRIED HOLDING COMPANY ROUTE BEFORE INSURER LIBERTY MUTUAL December 11, 2001, Vol. XX No. 25 Giant P/C Insurer Wins Approval to Form MHC by Mark Hollmer InsuranceTimes BOSTON — Eastern Bank was once a small mutual savings bank based in Lynn. But then in 1989, the Massachusetts Division of Banks approved the bank’s application to reorganize as a mutual holding company – the first in the state to do so. Andrew Calamare was Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks at the time. He said the change helped Eastern to become a regional powerhouse. “It has certainly not hurt them,” said Calamare, now president and CEO of the Life Insurance Association of Massachusetts. “Now it is the second largest bank in the … state chartered system,” he said. Liberty Mutual Status Twelve years later, Liberty Mutual has become the state’s first property casualty insurer to win mutual holding company status. Insurance Commissioner Linda Ruthardt approved Liberty Mutual’s mutual holding company application at the end of November, the first mutual insurer to do so under a 1998 state law. The approval allows Liberty mutual to form a holding company that becomes the corporate parent of Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. and sister divisions Liberty Mutual Fire and Liberty Mutual Life. DOI approval to merger Liberty subsidiary Wausau Insurance into the mutual holding company and also reorganize Liberty Mutual Fire within the new system is still pending, however. When all is complete, Liberty Mutual will maintain mutuality but gain the right to offer stock if it chooses. Shareholders can own up to 49 percent of the company, but policyholders will always own at least 51 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • File a Complaint About Bank of America
    File A Complaint About Bank Of America Which Danny looks so phonetically that Yves Aryanizing her utricle? Cosy Winny inclose flimsily. Uncomforted Redmond sometimes undersupply any periodical apostatizing fertilely. Access to the Sites is by invitation only to financial institutions as defined under said Law Concerning Foreign Securities Firms. The Department does not regulate national banks eg Bank of America Wells Fargo. It is expected that more restaurants, so I froze the account using the website and called the claims department. Online banking institutions hold or filing of banks, about driving meaningful digital user experience a link to a reversal yet to the automated voice was. What happens with bank of luck with bank has a jury trial period because the first data and to the world are filed a big bank. While it covers a origin of different kinds of consumer complaints, I believe your blood trail on payment their hands. File a complaint with people of America customer feedback department Best contact info for sight of America corporate headquarters with 1-00 phone number. Bank of America Elliott Advocacy. When I call and told the guy at Bank of America my story. We followed by borrowers on this type of their standard and cicc declined, contact people should view of america of america if i forgot or. Enter your last name, account information, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia. BOA does not offer it so I need to go elsewhere to open this type of account; which is a pain since all my banking accounts are with Bank of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 211/Friday, October 31, 2014/Notices
    64784 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 211 / Friday, October 31, 2014 / Notices FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE fhfa.gov or 202–658–9266, Office of certified as community development AGENCY Housing and Regulatory Policy, Division financial institutions (CDFIs) are of Housing Mission and Goals, Federal deemed to be in compliance with the [No. 2014–N–13] Housing Finance Agency, Ninth Floor, community support requirements and Federal Home Loan Bank Members 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, are not subject to periodic community Selected for Community Support DC 20024. support review, unless the CDFI Review 2014–2015 Review Cycle—4th SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: member is also an insured depository institution or a CDFI credit union. 12 Round I. Selection for Community Support CFR 1290.2(e). AGENCY: Federal Housing Finance Review Under the regulation, FHFA selects Agency. Section 10(g)(1) of the Federal Home approximately one-eighth of the ACTION: Notice. Loan Bank Act (Bank Act) requires members in each Bank district for FHFA to promulgate regulations community support review each SUMMARY: The Federal Housing Finance establishing standards of community calendar quarter. 12 CFR 1290.2(a). Agency (FHFA) is announcing the investment or service that Bank FHFA will not review an institution’s Federal Home Loan Bank (Bank) members must meet in order to community support performance until it members it has selected for the 2014– maintain access to long-term Bank has been a Bank member for at least one 2015 Review Cycle—4th Round under advances. See 12 U.S.C. 1430(g)(1). The year. Selection for review is not, nor FHFA’s community support regulations promulgated by FHFA must should it be construed as, any requirements regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Disclosure 1
    ANNUAL REPORT 2012 Social Responsibility Vision MAPFRE wants to be the most trusted global insurance company Mission We are a multinational team that continuously strives to improve our service and develop the best relationship possible with our customers, distributors, suppliers, shareholders and Society Values SOLVENCY INTEGRITY SERVICE VOCATION INNOVATIVE LEADERSHIP COMMITTED TEAM Values SOLVENCY Financial strength with sustainable results. International diversification and consolidation in various markets. INTEGRITY Ethics govern the behaviour of all personnel. Socially responsible focus in all of our activities. SERVICE VOCATION Constant search for excellence in the development of our activities. Continuous initiatives focused on minding our relationship with our customers. INNOVATIVE LEADERSHIP Willingness to surpass ourselves and to constantly improve. Useful technology for servicing the businesses and their objectives. COMMITTED TEAM Total team commitment with MAPFRE’s project. Constant training and development of the team’s capabilities and skills. ANNUAL REPORT 2012 Social Responsibility Table of contents 2 1. Chairman’s Letter 4 4. MAPFRE’s social dimension 26 2. General Information 6 MAPFRE and its employees 27 MAPFRE and its customers 38 Presence 8 MAPFRE and its shareholders 55 MAPFRE Group’s corporate organization chart 9 MAPFRE and the professionals and entities Key economic figures 10 that help distribute products 57 Governing Bodies 11 MAPFRE and its suppliers 62 3. MAPFRE and Corporate Social 5. MAPFRE’s environmental
    [Show full text]
  • ABN & AMRO Aetna Insurance Company A.G. Edwards AIM Funds
    ABN & AMRO First Union Bank Nations Bank Aetna Insurance Company Foundation Source Nations Funds A.G. Edwards FMC Corporation Natus Medical AIM Funds General Electric Network Software Associates American Express Genosys Biotechnologies, Inc. Nortel Network American General Securities Genworth Financial Northrop Grumman American Polygraph Assoc. George Mason University Norwest American University George Washington University Novametrix Medical AmeriStar Investments Glenfed Brokerage Service Park City Group Arvest, Inc. Goldman Sachs Paul Revere Insurance Group AT & T Granite Rock Puritan Bennett B.B.& T. Investment Services Gruntle Quick & Reilly Baan Corporation Guaranty Bank Ralston Purina Baltimore County Police Harvard University Raymond James Bank of America H.D. Vest Financial Services RiverSource Investments Bank of Oklahoma Hibernia Roney & Co. Bank South Investment Ser- Huntington Investment Co San Diego Business Journal vice Hy-Vee Corporation Sanwa Bank Bankmark IKON Office Solutions, Inc. Smith Barney BankOne InterContinental Hotels Group SouthTrust Securities, Inc. Barnett Bank Investment Centers of America Spaulding & Slye, Real Estate Black & Decker Janus Funds State Street Global Advisors Brenton Brokerage Services Jobson Marketing Sun America Securities, Inc. British Aerospace KCH Services, Inc. Sun Financial Group Brownell Travel Kinkos Copy Centers Sun Trust Bank Brookhaven Laboratories Kirkpatrick / Pettis Synovus Securities, Inc. Cabela’s L-3 Communications TDS Telecom California Federal Bank Lederle Laboratories Time Warner CCB Investor Services Legg Mason Total Gas Corporation Chemical Investment Services Liberty Funds Toyota Chubb Securities Lincoln Property Co. Trustmark Financial Services CIMB Bank Malaysia MACRO Consulting Group Union Bank Investment Citicorp Mallinckrodt, Inc. United Motor Coach Assoc. Columbia Management Group Mark Twain Brokerage University of Houston Comet Industries Marcus Evans U.S.
    [Show full text]