DOCSLIB.ORG

Koch's Postulates—Then And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Koch's Postulates—Then And Koch’s Postulates—Then and Now Amid challenges, his principles remain useful for confirming microbial roles in diseases and other processes D. Jay Grimes his story begins in the early 1880s. that diseased cells arose only from other dis- The germ theory of disease was fairly eased cells, and strongly opposed the germ the- well established, although some ex- ory of disease. Other skeptics could be cited, but T perts continued to challenge it. For the important point is that Koch was working in example, Theodor Billroth (1829– a controversial area of medicine and experimen- 1894) of Vienna, often called the founding fa- tal research in the late 1800s. ther of abdominal surgery, did not immediately accept the germ theory, but later embraced the Koch’s Early Focus on Tuberculosis concept and became very successful in many Led Him To Frame Postulates pioneering surgeries. Another critic was Max von Pettenkofer (1818–1901) of Bavaria, a In 1880, Robert Koch at age 37 moved his noted experimental hygienist. In 1892, Petten- family to Berlin, where he joined the staff of the kofer openly challenged Robert Koch (1843– Imperial Health Office. He had conducted his 1910) on his theories about Vibrio cholerae by anthrax research about a decade earlier and in drinking the contents of a flask containing the Berlin turned his attentions to the dreaded dis- cholera bacillus. The flask had been given to ease tuberculosis. He developed many tech- Pettenkofer by Koch himself, but Pettenkofer niques in his own laboratory, including how to did not contract cholera! Perhaps the biggest isolate pure cultures along with many applica- critic was the famous physician Rudolph Vir- tions of microscopy, photomicroscopy, and chow (1821–1902) of Berlin. Virchow believed staining. He also fitted his microscope with the oil-immersion lens that Ernst Abbe (1840– 1905) at the Carl Zeiss Company had re- Summary cently developed. At about this time, Edwin Klebs (1834– • When Robert Koch was framing his postulates 1913), a student of germ theory antagonist about infectious disease, several contemporaries Virchow, published a paper that delineated published similar ideas, while prominent skep- what would soon be established as Koch’s tics argued strongly against the germ theory of postulates (see box, p. 224). Klebs’s three disease. rules are strikingly similar to those of Koch • Koch, who studied cholera, and others, from his era and our own, recognized exceptions to his and his students, but Klebs could not verify postulates, particularly in dealing with species- his procedures mainly because he was un- specific pathogens for which suitable animal able to isolate pure cultures, a central re- models are difficult, and sometimes impossible, quirement for both his procedure and to identify. Koch’s postulates. D. Jay Grimes is • The principles underlying Koch’s postulates Koch published his discovery of the tu- Provost and Vice sometimes are being applied, for example, in bercle bacillus in 1882, describing an exact- President for Aca- environmental settings to address questions of ing approach that laid the framework for demic Affairs at microbial causality that are far afield from infec- his postulates. He observed and isolated the The University of tious diseases. microbe in pure culture from numerous pa- Southern Missis- tients, then introduced the microbe into sippi, Hattiesburg. Volume 1, Number 5, 2006 / Microbe Y 223 discovered the anthrax bacillus and defined its Procedure developed by Edwin role in causing anthrax, explaining that this Klebs to demonstrate causal approach laid the framework for his research on relationship between “germs” and tuberculosis. “[W]hether the organisms have disease constant characteristics. .” is the logic underly- ing his first postulate, and he insisted that this 1. Careful microscopic study of the dis- question should be asked during each investiga- eased organ tion of an infectious agent. 2. Isolation and culture of the germ Further in the same text, Koch discussed the associated with the disease basis for his second postulate—asking whether 3. Production of the same disease by “the parasite” is the cause of the illness or a inoculation of this cultured germ symptom. The answer to this question, he into healthy animals added, can be established only under circum- stances “in which the parasite is completely guinea pigs, successfully induced disease in separated from the diseased organism and from them, and then reisolated the microbe from all symptoms of the disease.” He then developed those animals. This work made Koch an instant the basis for his third postulate by stating that hero and his name a household word. “by introducing the isolated parasite into the In 1883, Friedrich Loeffler (1852–1915), one healthy organism the disease can be produced of Koch’s assistants, published a paper on diph- again with all its usual characteristics.” Over the theria (Fig. 1). Loeffler stated that three postulates next 80 pages, Koch further used his anthrax had to be fulfilled to prove that diphtheria is a discovery to explain the etiology of tuberculosis. disease caused by a specific microorganism (see Thus, Koch explained his postulates. How- box, below). He argued that these steps were ever, he did not publish them in the form that we necessary “to demonstrate strictly the parasitic recognize today until 1890 (see. box, p. 225). nature of a disease.” His three postulates and Since then, the postulates have been used ex- the procedures described by Koch a year earlier tensively to elucidate many diseases and are are nearly identical. Based on the work of Klebs presented in all beginning textbooks of micro- and Loeffler, one can question whether Koch’s biology. Whether Koch merely compiled or gen- postulates were his! uinely conceived them, he now is credited for articulating these simple but powerful tenets of Koch’s Formalized His Postulates infectious disease etiology. between 1884 and 1890 Early and More Recent Exceptions In 1884, Koch published a definitive paper on to Koch’s Postulates tuberculosis and more fully outlined his meth- During the next few decades, others uncovered odology. In the first pages, he described how he many exceptions to Koch’s postulates. Indeed, FIGURE 1 Loeffler’s Postulates (see p. 424 in Loeffler, 1883) 1. The organisms must be shown to be constantly present in characteristic form and arrangement in the dis- eased tissue. 2. The organisms which, from their be- havior appear to be responsible for the disease, must be isolated and cul- tivated in purity. 3. The pure cultures must be shown to Friedrich Loeffler and Robert Koch. induce disease experimentally. 224 Y Microbe / Volume 1, Number 5, 2006 it will no doubt become possible to satisfy Koch’s postulates for polymicrobial diseases. Koch’s Postulates as We Know Lysogenic bacteria provide another example Them Today of exceptions to the postulates. For instance, 1. The same organism must be present Loeffler’s diphtheria findings might have looked in every case of the disease. very different had the Corynebacterium diph- 2. The organism must be isolated from theriae strain that he discovered been cured of the diseased host and grown in pure their prophages before they were reintroduced culture. into susceptible hosts. Although we now realize 3. The isolate must cause the disease, that lysogenic bacteria cause many diseases (or when inoculated into a healthy, sus- intoxications), their etiologies are not always ceptible animal. immediately apparent. 4. The organism must be reisolated Another exception worth noting is contami- from the inoculated, diseased ani- nated cultures, and hog cholera provides a good mal. example. Originally thought to be caused by the FIGURE 2 he described one of those first exceptions himself! In 1884, when Koch published his findings on cholera, he noted that, with no animal model for this disease, he could not satisfy postulate three. Today, cholera mod- els do exist, including the rabbit ligated ileal loop assay. Moreover, modern molecular biological techniques and epidemiology of- ten help to overcome seeming obstacles to Koch’s postulates for those analyzing the etiology of infectious diseases. Other seeming exceptions to Koch’s pos- tulates include many of the diseases attrib- utable to viruses, animal parasites, rickett- sia, and chlamydia. In most of these cases, host specificity appears confined to humans, making it difficult if not impossible to verify the third postulate in an animal model. Al- though cell cultures now are available for many viruses, the disease itself cannot be recreated in cells, even if cytopathogenic effects can be observed. As for animal para- sites, intermediate hosts are often available, but human disease symptoms are not always manifest in these animals. Like viruses, rick- ettsia and chlamydia are obligate intracellu- lar parasites, and lack animal models. Polymicrobial causes of diseases have long been suspected, and today this is an emerging field of study. These disease pro- cesses, such as soft tissue abscesses and peri- odontal disease caused by mixed infections with anaerobes, cannot be recreated in other species. However, as microbiologists be- Membrane chambers (A) containing Escherichia coli H10407 were attached to a come more successful in producing func- sunken barge (B) in Nixon’s Harbor, South Bimini. tional mixed cultures, for whatever purpose, Volume 1, Number 5, 2006 / Microbe Y 225 bacterium Salmonella choleraesuis, hog cholera Two decades ago, Rita Colwell and I relied on is now known to be caused by a virus—the hog a variation of Koch’s postulates to show that cholera virus (HCV). HCV belongs to the family Escherichia coli can form somnicells. We sus- Flaviviridae, genus Pestivirus, and infections pended viable, culturable cells of E. coli H10407 with this virus can give rise to swine fever. In the (an enterotoxigenic strain) within membrane late 1890s, hog cholera was thought to be chambers in Nixon Harbor, South Bimini, Ba- caused by the S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MALARIA Despite All Differences in Biological Detail and Clinical Manifestations, Every Parasite's Existence Is Based on the Same Simple Basic Rule
    MALARIA Despite all differences in biological detail and clinical manifestations, every parasite's existence is based on the same simple basic rule: A PARASITE CAN BE CONSIDERED TO BE THE DEVICE OF A NUCLEIC ACID WHICH ALLOWS IT TO EXPLOIT THE GENE PRODUCTS OF OTHER NUCLEIC ACIDS - THE HOST ORGANISMS John Maynard Smith Today: The history of malaria The biology of malaria Host-parasite interaction Prevention and therapy About 4700 years ago, the Chinese emperor Huang-Ti ordered the compilation of a medical textbook that contained all diseases known at the time. In this book, malaria is described in great detail - the earliest written report of this disease. Collection of the University of Hongkong ts 03/07 Hawass et al., Journal of the American Medical Association 303, 2010, 638 ts 02/10 Today, malaria is considered a typical „tropical“ disease. As little as 200 years ago, this was quite different. And today it is again difficult to predict if global warming might cause a renewed expansion of malaria into the Northern hemisphere www.ch.ic.ac.uk ts 03/08 Was it prayers or was it malaria ? A pious myth relates that in the year 452, the the ardent prayers of pope Leo I prevented the conquest of Rome by the huns of king Attila. A more biological consideration might suggest that the experienced warrior king Attila was much more impressed by the information that Rome was in the grip of a devastating epidemic of which we can assume today that it was malaria. ts 03/07 In Europe, malaria was a much feared disease throughout most of European history.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of Delayed Immunization with Pneumococcal Vaccine and Aetiological Patterns of Pneumonia in Young Children
    Revista Latinoamericana de Hipertensión ISSN: 1856-4550 [email protected] Sociedad Latinoamericana de Hipertensión Venezuela Causes of delayed immunization with pneumococcal vaccine and aetiological patterns of pneumonia in young children Tukbekova, B. T.; Kizatova, S. T.; Zhanpeissova, A. A.; Dyussenova, S. B.; Serikova, G.B.; Isaeva, A.A.; Tlegenova, K.S.; Kiryanova, T.A. Causes of delayed immunization with pneumococcal vaccine and aetiological patterns of pneumonia in young children Revista Latinoamericana de Hipertensión, vol. 14, no. 3, 2019 Sociedad Latinoamericana de Hipertensión, Venezuela Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=170263176021 Derechos reservados. Queda prohibida la reproducción total o parcial de todo el material contenido en la revista sin el consentimiento por escrito del editor en jefe. Copias de los artículos: Todo pedido de separatas deberá ser gestionado directamente con el editor en jefe, quien gestionará dicha solicitud ante la editorial encargada de la publicación. This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International. PDF generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative B. T. Tukbekova, et al. Causes of delayed immunization with pneumococcal vaccine and aetiological ... Artículos Causes of delayed immunization with pneumococcal vaccine and aetiological patterns of pneumonia in young children Causas de la inmunización tardía con la vacuna neumocócica y los patrones etiológicos de neumonía en niños pequeños B. T. Tukbekova Redalyc: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa? Karaganda State Medical University, Department id=170263176021 of childhood diseases no. 2, Karaganda, Kazakhstan, Kazajistán [email protected] http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4279-3638 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccines Through Centuries: Major Cornerstones of Global Health
    REVIEW published: 26 November 2015 doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00269 Vaccines Through Centuries: Major Cornerstones of Global Health Inaya Hajj Hussein 1*, Nour Chams 2, Sana Chams 2, Skye El Sayegh 2, Reina Badran 2, Mohamad Raad 2, Alice Gerges-Geagea 3, Angelo Leone 4 and Abdo Jurjus 2,3 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA, 2 Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon, 3 Lebanese Health Society, Beirut, Lebanon, 4 Department of Experimental and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy Multiple cornerstones have shaped the history of vaccines, which may contain live- attenuated viruses, inactivated organisms/viruses, inactivated toxins, or merely segments of the pathogen that could elicit an immune response. The story began with Hippocrates 400 B.C. with his description of mumps and diphtheria. No further discoveries were recorded until 1100 A.D. when the smallpox vaccine was described. During the eighteenth century, vaccines for cholera and yellow fever were reported and Edward Jenner, the father of vaccination and immunology, published his work on smallpox. The nineteenth century was a major landmark, with the “Germ Theory of disease” of Louis Pasteur, the discovery of the germ tubercle bacillus for tuberculosis by Robert Koch, and the Edited by: isolation of pneumococcus organism by George Miller Sternberg. Another landmark was Saleh AlGhamdi, the discovery of diphtheria toxin by Emile Roux and its serological treatment by Emil King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Saudi Arabia Von Behring and Paul Ehrlih.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicine in 18Th and 19Th Century Britain, 1700-1900
    Medicine in 18th and 19th century Britain, 1700‐1900 The breakthroughs th 1798: Edward Jenner – The development of How had society changed to make medical What was behind the 19 C breakthroughs? Changing ideas of causes breakthroughs possible? vaccinations Jenner trained by leading surgeon who taught The first major breakthrough came with Louis Pasteur’s germ theory which he published in 1861. His later students to observe carefully and carry out own Proved vaccination prevented people catching smallpox, experiments proved that bacteria (also known as microbes or germs) cause diseases. However, this did not put an end The changes described in the Renaissance were experiments instead of relying on knowledge in one of the great killer diseases. Based on observation and to all earlier ideas. Belief that bad air was to blame continued, which is not surprising given the conditions in many the result of rapid changes in society, but they did books – Jenner followed these methods. scientific experiment. However, did not understand what industrial towns. In addition, Pasteur’s theory was a very general one until scientists begun to identify the individual also build on changes and ideas from earlier caused smallpox all how vaccination worked. At first dad bacteria which cause particular diseases. So, while this was one of the two most important breakthroughs in ideas centuries. The flushing toilet important late 19th C invention wants opposition to making vaccination compulsory by law about what causes disease and illness it did not revolutionise medicine immediately. Scientists and doctors where the 1500s Renaissance – flushing system sent waste instantly down into – overtime saved many people’s lives and wiped‐out first to be convinced of this theory, but it took time for most people to understand it.
    [Show full text]
  • Bradford Hill Criteria for Causal Inference Based on a Presentation at the 2015 ANZEA Conference
    Bradford Hill Criteria for Causal Inference Based on a presentation at the 2015 ANZEA Conference Julian​ King Director,​ Julian King & Associates – a member of the Kinnect Group www.julianking.co.nz​ | www.kinnect.co.nz 2015 We think we’re good at determining causality, but we suck at it One​ of the great At​ one level, this is an Unfortunately,​ though, the challenges in evaluation is everyday, common sense way we are wired does not determining whether the task. As a species we’ve predispose us to logical results we’re seeing are been making judgments thinking. We are inclined because of the program about causation for a to be led astray by all sorts we’re evaluating, some million years or so. of biases and heuristics. other influences out there in the big world, or random chance. The​ Kinnect Group www.kinnect.co.nz 2 Along came logic Eventually,​ after a very long time, we evolved into philosophers who invented formal logic. Thanks to scientific method, our species has recently triumphed to the extent that we now have cars that drive themselves and flying drones that deliver pizza (don’t confuse this with progress – we still suck at ethics but that’s a story for another day). 3 But we’re still not great at causation Over​ time, the rocket But​ deep down we’re still Such​ a rigid view is not science for dealing with biased, heuristical beings much use in the real causation has become and not very good at world, where there are all more sophisticated – a thinking things through.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Bacteriology
    LECTURE NOTES Degree and Diploma Programs For Environmental Health Students Medical Bacteriology Abilo Tadesse, Meseret Alem University of Gondar In collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education September 2006 Funded under USAID Cooperative Agreement No. 663-A-00-00-0358-00. Produced in collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education. Important Guidelines for Printing and Photocopying Limited permission is granted free of charge to print or photocopy all pages of this publication for educational, not-for-profit use by health care workers, students or faculty. All copies must retain all author credits and copyright notices included in the original document. Under no circumstances is it permissible to sell or distribute on a commercial basis, or to claim authorship of, copies of material reproduced from this publication. ©2006 by Abilo Tadesse, Meseret Alem All rights reserved. Except as expressly provided above, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission of the author or authors. This material is intended for educational use only by practicing health care workers or students and faculty in a health care field. PREFACE Text book on Medical Bacteriology for Medical Laboratory Technology students are not available as need, so this lecture note will alleviate the acute shortage of text books and reference materials on medical bacteriology.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Simms Medical Collection
    Shelfmark Title Author Publication Information Clinical lectures on diseases of the nervous system, delivered at the Infirmary of La Salpêtrière / by Charcot, J. M. (Jean London : New Sydenham Society, Simm/ RC358 CHAR Professor J.M. Charcot ; translated by Thomas Sv ill ; containing eighty-six woodcuts. Martin) 1889. Simm/ p QP101 FAUR Ars medica Italorum laus : la scoperta della circolazione del sangue è gloria italiana. Faure, Giovanni. Roma : Don Luigi Guanella" 1933 Brockbank, Edward Manchester (Eng.) : G. Falkner, Simm/ p QD22.D2 BROC John Dalton, experimental physiologist and would-be physician / by E. M. Brockbank. Mansfield, 1866- 1929. Queen's University of q Z988 QUEE Interim short-title list of Samuel Simms collection (in the Medical Library). Belfast. Library. Belfast : 1965-1972. Sepulchretum, sive, Anatomia practica : ex cadaveribus morbo denatis, proponens historias et observationes omnium humani corporis affectuum, ipsorumq : causas reconditas revelans : quo nomine, tam pathologiæ genuinæ, quà m nosocomiæ orthodoxæ fundatrix, imo medicinæ veteris Bonet, Théophile, Genevæ : Sumptibus Cramer & Simm/ f RB24 BONE ac novæ promptuarium, dici meretur : cum indicibus necessariis / Theophili Boneti. 1620-1689. Perachon, 1700. Jo. Baptistæ Morgagni P. P. P. P. De sedibus, et causis morborum per anatomen indagatis libri quinque : Dissectiones, et animadversiones, nunc primum editas, complectuntur propemodum innumeras, medicis, chirurgis, anatomicis profuturas. Multiplex præfixus est index rerum, & nominum Morgagni, Giambattista, Venetiis : Ex typographia Simm/ f RB24 MORG accuratissimus. Tomus primus (-secundus). 1682-1771. Remondiniana, MDCCLXI (1761). Ortus medicinae, id est Initia physicae inaudita : progressus medicinae nouus, in morborum vltionem Lugduni : Sumptibus Ioan. Ant. ad vitam longam / authore Ioan. Baptista Van Helmont ... ; edente authoris filio Francisco Mercurio Van Helmont, Jean Baptiste Huguetan, & Guillielmi Barbier, Simm/ f R128.7 HELM Helmont ; cum eius praefatione ex Belgico translata.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Pathological Epidemiology in Diabetes Mellitus and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Submit a Manuscript: http://www.wjgnet.com/esps/ World J Hepatol 2016 September 28; 8(27): 1119-1127 Help Desk: http://www.wjgnet.com/esps/helpdesk.aspx ISSN 1948-5182 (online) DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i27.1119 © 2016 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. REVIEW Molecular pathological epidemiology in diabetes mellitus and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma Chun Gao Chun Gao, Department of Gastroenterology, China-Japan logy and epidemiology, and investigates the relationship Friendship Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing 100029, China between exogenous and endogenous exposure factors, tumor molecular signatures, and tumor initiation, progres- Author contributions: Gao C conceived the topic, performed sion, and response to treatment. Molecular epidemiology research, retrieved concerned literatures and wrote the paper. broadly encompasses MPE and conventional-type mole- cular epidemiology. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) Supported by Beijing NOVA Programme of Beijing Municipal is the third most common cause of cancer-associated Science and Technology Commission, No. Z13110.7000413067. death worldwide and remains as a major public health Conflict-of-interest statement: No conflict of interest. challenge. Over the past few decades, a number of epidemiological studies have demonstrated that diabetes Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was mellitus (DM) is an established independent risk factor selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external for HCC. However, how DM affects the occurrence and
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations of Epidemiology
    66221_CH01_5398.qxd 6/19/09 11:16 AM Page 1 © Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION CHAPTER 1 Foundations of Epidemiology OBJECTIVES After completing this chapter, you will be able to: ■ Define epidemiology. ■ Define descriptive epidemiology. ■ Define analytic epidemiology. ■ Identify some activities performed in epidemiology. ■ Explain the role of epidemiology in public health practice and individual decision making. ■ Define epidemic, endemic, and pandemic. ■ Describe common source, propagated, and mixed epidemics. ■ Describe why a standard case definition and adequate levels of reporting are important in epidemiologic investigations. ■ Describe the epidemiology triangle for infectious disease. ■ Describe the advanced epidemiology triangle for chronic diseases and behavioral disorders. ■ Define the three levels of prevention used in public health and epidemiology. ■ Understand the basic vocabulary used in epidemiology. 66221_CH01_5398.qxd 6/19/09 11:16 AM Page 2 © Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION 2 CHAPTER 1 ■ Foundations of Epidemiology In recent years, the important role of epidemiology has become increasingly recognized. Epidemiology is a core subject required in public health and health education programs; it is a study that provides information about public health problems and the causes of those problems. This information is then used to improve the health and social conditions of people. Epidemiology has a population focus in that epidemiologic investigations are concerned with the collective health of the people in a community or population under study. In contrast, a clinician is concerned for the health of an individual. The clinician focuses on treating and caring for the patient, whereas the epidemiologist focuses on iden- tifying the source or exposure of disease, disability or death, the number of persons exposed, and the potential for further spread.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Pathological Epidemiology Gives Clues to Paradoxical Findings
    Molecular Pathological Epidemiology Gives Clues to Paradoxical Findings The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Nishihara, Reiko, Tyler J. VanderWeele, Kenji Shibuya, Murray A. Mittleman, Molin Wang, Alison E. Field, Edward Giovannucci, Paul Lochhead, and Shuji Ogino. 2015. “Molecular Pathological Epidemiology Gives Clues to Paradoxical Findings.” European Journal of Epidemiology 30 (10): 1129–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10654-015-0088-4. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41392032 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptEur J Epidemiol Author Manuscript. Author Author Manuscript manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 07. Published in final edited form as: Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 October ; 30(10): 1129–1135. doi:10.1007/s10654-015-0088-4. Molecular Pathological Epidemiology Gives Clues to Paradoxical Findings Reiko Nishiharaa,b,c, Tyler J. VanderWeeled,e, Kenji Shibuyac, Murray A. Mittlemand,f, Molin Wangd,e,g, Alison E. Fieldd,g,h,i, Edward Giovannuccia,d,g, Paul Lochheadi,j, and Shuji Oginob,d,k aDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 655 Huntington Ave., Boston, Massachusetts 02115 USA bDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, Massachusetts 02215 USA cDepartment of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan dDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H.
    [Show full text]
  • HIV and AIDS: a Module for Cnas and Hhas
    HIV AND AIDS: A Module for CNAs AND HHAs INTRODUCTION The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a virus that is transmitted through sexual contact or contact with infected blood. HIV causes an illness called acquired immune deficiency syndrome - AIDS. AIDS was first diagnosed in New York City and San Francisco in 1981. However, there is evidence that HIV has actually been infecting people for many, many years before it was recognized and isolated cases of AIDS had occurred many years before the epidemic started. The cause of AIDS, HIV, was finally isolated in 1983. There are now over 33 million people in the world who are infected with HIV. A large number of them will develop AIDS, and AIDS is an enormous public health problem in the United States and worldwide. Modern medications have now allowed many people infected with HIV to avoid developing AIDS. However, there is no cure for HIV infection - the virus cannot be eliminated or eradicated - and there is still no vaccine available that can prevent the spread of HIV. Learning Break: Many people use the terms HIV and AIDS interchangeably, but it is important to remember that they are two different things. HIV is the virus that causes AIDS. AIDS is the disease - or group of diseases - that are caused by infection with HIV. Someone can be infected with HIV but not have AIDS. OBJECTIVES When the student has finished this module, he/she will be able to: 1. Identify a definition of HIV. 2. Identify a definition of AIDS. 3. Identify the basic defense mechanism the body uses against infections.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonization V. Infection
    Colonization vs Infection Colonization • The presence of microorganisms in or on a host with growth and multiplication but without tissue invasion or damage • Understanding this concept is essential in the planning and implantation of epidemiological studies in a healthcare infection prevention and control program Infection v. Colonization • Confusing colonization with infection can lead to spurious associations that may lead to expensive, ineffective, and time‐ consuming interventions Multi Drug‐Resistant Organisms Management in Long Term Care • Colonization may become infection when changes in the host Facilities Workshop occur Louisiana Office of Public Health Healthcare‐Associated Infections Program Objectives Colonization: Definition By the end of the presentation, attendees will be able to: • Colonization: presence of a microorganism on/in a host, with • Define colonization growth and multiplication of the organism, but without • Differentiate colonization from infections interaction between host and organism (no clinical expression, no immune response). • Apply appropriate laboratory test by common LTC infectious • agents Carrier: individual which is colonized + more • • Understand the necessity of communicating infectious status Subclinical or unapparent infection: presence of upon patient transfer microorganism and interaction between host and microorganism (sub clinical response, immune response). Often the term colonization is applied for relationship host‐ agent in which the immune response is difficult to elicit. • Contamination: Presence of a microorganism on a body surface or an inanimate object. 1 Colonization vs Infection Spectrum: No Exposure ‐ Exposure ‐ Colonization ‐ Carrier Infection ‐ Disease A carrier is an individual that harbors a specific microorganism Host + Infectious agent What is “Exposed” ? in the absence of discernible clinical disease and serve as a No foothold: Exposed Means of transmission: potential source of infection.
    [Show full text]