Oregon Lakes Tui Chub (Gila Bicolor Oregonensis)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oregon Lakes Tui Chub (Gila Bicolor Oregonensis) Oregon Lakes Tui Chub tion and abundance of this subspecies. No recent (Gila bicolor oregonensis) surveys of habitats occupied by the Oregon Lakes tui chub are known. Thus, any additional, recent The Oregon Lakes tui chub, as defined here, is factors influencing its status are unknown. The endemic to the Abert Lake Basin of south-central introduction of non-native fishes also threatens the Oregon (Bills 1977). Remaining populations are continued existence of this subspecies. The type classified by the State of Oregon as vulnerable. locality population, at XL Spring, is particularly The American Fisheries Society lists the Oregon vulnerable to loss because of its restricted habitat. Lakes tui chub as a species of special concern (Williams and others 1989), although they use the Summer Basin Tui Chub common name XL Spring tui chub for this form. (Gila bicolor spp.) Distribution and Status The Summer Basin tui chub is endemic to springs and outflows in the Summer Basin of south- The Oregon Lakes tui chub complex, as originally central Oregon. The form was considered of described by Snyder (1908), consisted of tui chub uncertain taxonomic status and possibly extinct by populations in five isolated basins of south-central Bills (1977) during a thorough review of the Oregon: Silver, Summer, Abert, Alkali, and Oregon tui chub complex in southern Oregon. Warner. The pioneering work of Bills (1977) Summer Basin tui chubs were rediscovered in demonstrated that morphological divergence had 1985. This subspecies is listed as a Cl Candidate occurred among these long-isolated populations by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and as en- and he recognized that the complex of tui chubs dangered by the American Fisheries Society actually consists of four subspecies. Only popula- (Williams and others 1989). tions in the Abert Lake Basin are retained in Gila bicolor oregonensis. They occur in XL Spring to the Distribution and Status north of Abert Lake and in the Chewaucan River (map 4.53). Abert Lake is, in general, fishless but Historically, the Summer Basin tui chub occurred records of chubs exist, presumably in areas of at various localities within Summer Basin, includ- spring or river inflow (Snyder 1908). No changes ing springs at the Summer Lake Post Office, Ana between historic and current distributions are River, and source springs of the Ana River (map known although the Abert Lake Basin has not 4.54) (Snyder 1908). Collections in these localities been adequately sampled. during the 1960s and 1970s indicated divergence from the form that was native to the Summer Habitat Relationships Basin, a result of numerous applications of fish toxicants and transplants of chubs from adjacent In general, tui chubs occupy a wide variety of basins (Bills 1977). The native form was consid- habitats (Moyle 1976). In the Abert Lake Basin, ered extinct until rediscovered from a small, previ- the Oregon Lakes tui chub inhabits springs, rivers, ously unsampled spring system on the west side of and ditches. The Oregon Lakes tui chub is absent the Summer Lake bed in 1985.9 The subspecies from higher gradient portions of the Chewaucan now occupies a small portion of its historic range. River system. Habitat Relationships Key Factors Influencing Status Habitat relationships are poorly known because Agricultural practices, including ditching and habitats in the Summer Basin have been greatly diverting stream flows as well as livestock grazing, modified and the fish were eliminated from much are the principal factors influencing the distribu- 'Personal communication. 1995. C.E. Bond and J.E. Williams, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. Personal communication of unpublished data. Aquatics Map 4.53--Historical and current distribution of Oregon Lakes tui chub. 1304 A q u at ic s Map 4.54--Historical and current distribution of Summer Basin tui chub. Aquatics of its range prior to surveys. Historically, the Refuge, Washoe County in Nevada, and Piute and Summer Basin tui chub appears to have occurred Guano creeks, Lake County in Oregon (Hubbs in a variety of spring and creek systems in the and Miller 1948, Williams and Bond 1981). basin. Sheldon tui chubs apparently are extremely rare in Guano Creek and have only been collected there Key Factors Influencing Status twice.10 Fishes in Ana Springs, its outflow and associated Habitat Relationships reservoir have been repeatedly poisoned to rid the area of nongame fish in favor of game species. The Sheldon tui chub occurs in those portions of Such efforts along with subsequent transplants of Fish and Piute creeks described as small, turbid tui chubs from adjacent basins apparently elimi- desert streams with abundant aquatic and riparian nated the native tui chub from the Ana River vegetation. During drought years, the chubs may system. Additional transplants of non-native fishes be restricted to isolated pools in intermittent appear to have eliminated the native form from stream sections. The Sheldon tui chub typically is springs and ditches in the Post Office area. The absent from downstream reaches, which often dry remaining population occurs in small, isolated during summer months. When water is abundant, springs in the southern portion of Summer Basin. chubs also may occur in terminal lakes and reser- During brief surveys in 1985, habitats of the voirs of these streams as suggested by the discovery remaining population were threatened by livestock of skeletal remains of Sheldon tui chub in Swan grazing and water diversions. It is uncertain Lake Reservoir, which is the terminal water body whether the subspecies continues to persist in its on Fish Creek (Williams and Bond 1981). restricted habitat. Primary threats include habitat degradation by livestock, water diversions, and Key Factors Influencing Status introductions of non-native species. Drought, fire, and other disturbances also could threaten this All streams where the Sheldon tui chub occur subspecies. could be described as "marginal" in reference to their small and often intermittent nature. Grazing Sheldon Tui Chub by livestock apparently has limited the amount of available habitat by reducing riparian vegetation (Gila bicolor eurysomd) and limiting soil water retention, which leads to The Sheldon tui chub was described from speci- drying of additional stream segments during mens collected from Fish Creek, Washoe County, summer and autumn (Williams and Bond 1981). Nevada (Williams and Bond 1981). This subspe- Reductions in stream flow due to overgrazing and cies, which occurs sporadically in the mostly arid water diversion appear to be the primary threat to Guano Basin of southeastern Oregon and north- this subspecies. Because of the species restricted western Nevada, is listed as a species of special range and small habitat size, such factors will concern by the American Fisheries Society exacerbate risks associated with environmental (Williams and others 1989). stochasticity, such as drought. Although intro- duced fish have not been documented from water Distribution and Status inhabited by the Sheldon tui chub, any introduc- tions could be detrimental to this subspecies. The Sheldon tui chub is restricted to isolated waters of the Guano Basin of southeastern Oregon '"Personal communication. 1995. J. Williams, Bureau of Land and northwestern Nevada (map 4.55). Within Management, Boise, Idaho. Personal communication of Guano Basin, the subspecies has been reported unpublished data. from Fish Creek on the Sheldon National Wildlife Aquatics Hutton Tui Chub (Gilo, bicolor spp.) the Bonneville Basin into the Snake Basin. Its current distribution in Idaho may, in part, also be due to its The Hutton tui chub, collected as early as 1908, release as a bait fish. The leatherside chub is presendy has been found in only two surface flow areas of listed by the BLM as a sensitive species, and by die Hutton Spring, Oregon. The Hutton tui chub was Idaho Department of Fish and Game as a species of listed as threatened in 1985 by the U.S. Fish and special concern, Category C undetermined status. Wildlife Service. It is also considered threatened by the American Fisheries Society (Williams and Distribution and Status others 1989). In 1934, Carl Hubbs made die first reported collec- Distribution and Status tion of leatherside chub in Idaho.11 The leatherside chub was collected in the 1970s in die Raft River Hutton tui chubs still inhabit their historical and Goose Creek tributaries of the Snake River and locations (map 4.56). The subspecies is restricted the Litde Wood River, all in Idaho (map 4.57).12 In to Hutton Spring and a small nearby spring in the 1995, leadierside chubs were collected from Trapper, Alkali Lake Basin of south-central Oregon (Bills Goose, and Beaver Dam creeks, all part of the Goose 1977). In 1977, population estimates were 300 at Creek drainage near the Nevada-Utah border.13 Hutton Spring and 150 at the unnamed spring. Otherwise, because of a lack of surveys, their current status is unknown. Habitat Relationships The Hutton tui chub lives its entire life in spring Habitat Relationships habitats. Little is known about their habitat re- Little is known about the habitat requirements of quirements, with the exception that dense aquatic leatherside chub. They typically occur in cool to vegetation is needed for spawning and rearing of cold creeks and rivers, with adults residing in pools young. and riffles and young inhabiting brushy, quiet pockets near the shoreline. Water quality ranges Key Factors Influencing Status from clear to occasionally turbid. Leatherside chub The habitat of the Hutton tui chub, along with that are typically found associated with gravel substrate, of the Foskett speckled dace, are die most restricted but they also use all substrate sizes. of any fish in the assessment area. Because of their limited distribution and small population size, Key Factors Influencing Status Hutton tui chubs are at risk A hazardous waste The most significant threat to the leatherside chub dump at Alkali Lake threatens to contaminate sur- is loss of habitat caused by development of irriga- face floodwater, groundwater, and air at Hutton tion projects in the 1930s.
Recommended publications
  • Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis
    Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis Fremont-Winema National Forest 2005 Lower Sycan River T33S,R12E,S23 Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 General Watershed Area.....................................................................................................................................2 Geology and Soils.................................................................................................................................................5 Climate..................................................................................................................................................................6 STEP 1. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE WATERSHED ................................................................... 7 I. Watershed and Aquatics.................................................................................................................................7 Soils And Geomorphology...............................................................................................................................................10 Aquatic Habitat ................................................................................................................................................................10 II. Vegetation.....................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Vicki S
    State of Oregon Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Vicki S. McConnell, State Geologist USING AIRBORNE THERMAL INFRARED AND LIDAR IMAGERY TO SEARCH FOR GEOTHERMAL ANOMALIES IN OREGON 1 2 3 1 BY IAN P. MADIN , JOHN T. ENGLISH , PAUL A. FERRO , CLARK A. NIEWENDORP 2013 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries; 2, City of Hillsboro, Oregon; 3, Port of Portland, Oregon OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES, 800 NE OREGON STREET, #28, SUITE 965, PORTLAND, OR 97232 i DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
    [Show full text]
  • Game Commission Bulletin Volume Iv, Numbers 1 To12 January to December, 1949
    INDEX Otepret Stare GAME COMMISSION BULLETIN VOLUME IV, NUMBERS 1 TO12 JANUARY TO DECEMBER, 1949 ADMINISTRATION No. MonthPage Trout FishingSport or No. MonthPage Meat F A. Westerman7July 6 Fisheries Staff Hold Annual Conference... 1 Jan. 3 Winter Pheasant Feeding Game and Fisheries Division Heads Study Francis Schneider9 Sept. 1 Appointed 9 Sept. 3 1948 Deer and Elk Kills R U. Mace5May 1 Game Field Agents Meet 7July 8 1948 in Review C A. Lockwood1Jan. 1 Governor Appoints New Members to 1949 Angling Regulations...R. C. Holloway2Feb. 1 Game Commission 8Aug. 3 1949 Game Outlook John McKean Smelt License Sales High 5May 3 and R. U. Mace8Aug. 1 1948 License Sales Show Increase 7July 3 FEDERAL AID BIG GAME February Meeting of the Game Commission3March 2 Antelope Progress Report on the Public Joint Aerial Antelope Survey Completed. 5May 3 Shooting Program 10Oct. 1 1949 Antelope Season 10Oct. 2 Sauvie Island Shooting Area 9 Sept. 4 All Oregon Antelope Hunters Report.... 12Dec. 3 Big Game Winter Problems 2Feb. 1 Deer FIRE ARMS Deer Hunters Reminded to Mail Summary of 1949 Hunting Regulations .... 8 Aug. Report Cards 9Sept. 5 Deer Report Cards Due 11Nov. 1 FISHERIES Fawns Like to be Left Alone 5 May 3 Information Please 6 June 7 Back Country Lakes 6June 1 Is It a Deer or a Man? 9 Sept. 1 1948 Deer and Elk Kills 5May 1 Census 1949 Deer Kill 12Dec. 1 Angling Stress Heavy in Central Oregon Waters 8Aug. 7 Elk Four Cascade Lakes Yield 45 Tons Fish 1 Jan. 1 Elk Season Opens October 25 10Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Santa Ana River Tributaries Restoration Project and Mitigation Reserve Program
    Upper Santa Ana River Tributaries Restoration Project and Mitigation Reserve Program TRIBUTRIBUTARY RESTORATION Draft Environmental Impact Report | April 2019 Prepared for: San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District 380 East Vanderbilt Way San Bernardino, California Prepared by: ICF 1250 Corona Pointe Ct, Suite 406 Corona, California Contents List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... vii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... xv Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.2 Background .................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.3 Project Location and Area .............................................................................................. ES-2 ES.4 Project Objectives .......................................................................................................... ES-4 ES.5 Project Description .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2016 Proclamation 9396—Establishment of the Sand to Snow National Monument February 12, 2016
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2016 Proclamation 9396—Establishment of the Sand to Snow National Monument February 12, 2016 By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation The Sand to Snow area of southern California is an ecological and cultural treasure, a microcosm of the great geographic diversity of the region. Rising from the floor of the Sonoran Desert to the tallest peak in southern California, the area features a remarkable diversity of plant and animal species. The area includes a portion of the San Bernardino National Forest and connects this area with Joshua Tree National Park to the east, knitting together a mosaic of spectacular landscapes stretching over 200 miles. The mountain peaks of the Sand to Snow area frame the northeastern reach of Coachella Valley along with the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument to the south. Home to desert oases at Big Morongo Canyon and Whitewater Canyon, the area serves as a refuge for desert dwelling animals and a stopover for migrating birds. The archaeological riches of the Black Lava Buttes and the historical remains of mining and ranching communities tell of past prosperity and struggle in this arid land. The unbroken expanse is an invaluable treasure for our Nation and will continue to serve as an irreplaceable resource for archaeologists, geologists, and biologists for generations to come. The Sand to Snow area encompasses a rich diversity of geological and ecological resources, including a nearly 10,000-foot elevation gradient from the Sonoran Desert floor to the top of the 11,500-foot San Gorgonio Mountain, the highest mountain in southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Pumice Beds at Summer Lake, Oregon
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL.56, PP. 789-808, 3 PLS., 4 FIGS. AUGUST 1945 PUMICE BEDS AT SUMMER LAKE, OREGON BY IRA S. ALLISON COIS'TENTS !>agT Abstract 78<> Introduction 791 Geologic setting 79! Acknowledgments 791 Late Pleistocene and Recent history of Summer Lake basin 791 Ana River sections 794 Description of the pumice 795 Significance of the record 800 Mount Mazama 800 Age of Crater Lake 800 By pluvial lake levels 800 By stratigraphic position 801 By pollen records 802 Ancient man in Oregon 804 Post-Pleistocene chronology 805 References cited 806 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Index map of south-central Oregon 790 2. Key to aerial photographs 792 3. Partial section of lake beds at Ana River, Summer Lake basin, Oregon 796 4. Changing levels of pluvial lakes in Lahontan and Summer Lake basins in late Quaternary time 801 Plate Facing page 1. Pluvial lake features 792 2. Pluvial lake sediments 794 3. Pumice beds 795 ABSTRACT A section of lake beds exposed in the sides of the trench of Ana River below Ana Spring near thr northwest corner of Summer Lake basin in Lake County, Oregon, reveals near the top at least six layers of pumice. Four of these appear to record eruptions of Mount Mazama which led finallv to the formation of Crater Lake; the source of the fifth is not known; the sixth is attributed to a later eruption of Newberry Crater. As certain layers in the associated sediments imply shaJlow-wati- conditions, these eruptions must have occurred when the last pluvial lake, formerly about 215 fee: deep, had been reduced by evaporation to a depth of about 85 feet, probably about 14,000 years ag( .
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Surfaces of the Sprague and Lower Sycan Rivers, Oregon by Jim E
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Prepared in cooperation with the SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 2014−5223 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, and the Geomorphic surfaces—PLATE 1 U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE O'Connor, J.E., McDowell, P.F., Lind, Pollyanna, Rasmussen, C.G., Keith, M.K., 2015, Geomorphology and Flood-Plain Vegetation of the Sprague and Lower Sycan Rivers, Klamath Basin, Oregon DESCRIPTION OF MAPPING UNIT Geomorphic Flood Plain (Holocene)—Area of Holocene channel migration; channels and active flood plains along the North Fork Active Tributary Flood Plain (Holocene)—Tributary channel, flood plain, and basin fill deposits in low-gradient areas subject to Sycan Flood Deposits (Holocene)—A prominent planar surface extending south discontinuously from the lower Sycan River Qfp Sprague, South Fork Sprague, main-stem Sprague, and Sycan Rivers. This map unit, divided into valley segments, is the area of Qtfp inundation, and unconfined by valley margins. Tributary channels and flanking surfaces grade to modern main-stem channels Qsf canyon to its confluence with the Sprague River. This surface stands 3 m above the active flood plain at the downstream end of the detailed mapping analysis of constructed features, historical channel change, and vegetation described in this report. This and flood plains, forming narrow and elongate map units extending into the uplands where channels become increasingly Sycan Canyon, and descends to flood plain level near the Sycan River confluence with the Sprague River. It is underlain by as Portland unit encompasses the area of channels, abandoned channels, and bar-and-scroll topography evident on the 2004 Light topographically confined.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Studies Near Summer Lake, Oregon Friends of the Pleistocene Ninth Annual Pacific Northwest Cell Field Trip September 28-30, 2001
    Quaternary Studies near Summer Lake, Oregon Friends of the Pleistocene Ninth Annual Pacific Northwest Cell Field Trip September 28-30, 2001 springs, bars, bays, shorelines, fault, dunes, etc. volcanic ashes and lake-level proxies in lake sediments N Ana River Fault N Paisley Caves Pluvial Lake Chewaucan Slide Mountain pluvial shorelines Quaternary Studies near Summer Lake, Oregon Friends of the Pleistocene Ninth Annual Pacific Northwest Cell Field Trip September 28-30, 2001 Rob Negrini, Silvio Pezzopane and Tom Badger, Editors Trip Leaders Rob Negrini, California State University, Bakersfield, CA Silvio Pezzopane, United States Geological Survey, Denver, CO Rob Langridge, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, Lower Hutt, New Zealand Ray Weldon, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR Marty St. Louis, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Summer Lake, Oregon Daniel Erbes, Bureau of Land Management, Carson City, Nevada Glenn Berger, Desert Research Institute, University of Nevada, Reno, NV Manuel Palacios-Fest, Terra Nostra Earth Sciences Research, Tucson, Arizona Peter Wigand, California State University, Bakersfield, CA Nick Foit, Washington State University, Pullman, WA Steve Kuehn, Washington State University, Pullman, WA Andrei Sarna-Wojcicki, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA Cynthia Gardner, USGS, Cascades Volcano Observatory, Vancouver, WA Rick Conrey, Washington State University, Pullman, WA Duane Champion, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA Michael Qulliam, California State University, Bakersfield,
    [Show full text]
  • Abert and Summer Lakes, South-Central Oregon
    ... ( t.• CE'...,.. ~ - ~'>01..1.4_... ~ Dl - . ,, c E: 70. I V F' O I 12 "7.'t: I z Solute Balance at 'i.'] .J Abert and Summer Lakes, South-Central Oregon GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 502-C Solute Balance at Abert and Summer Lakes, South-Central Oregon By A. S. VAN DENBURGH CLOSED- BASIN INVESTIGATIONS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 502-C A description of the quantity and chemical character of incoming, outgoing, and stored solutes and the mechanisms of solute accumulation and depletion in a saline environment UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1975 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data VanDenburgh, A. S. Solute balance at Abert and Summer Lakes, south-central Oregon. (Closed-basin investigations) (Geological Survey Professional Paper 502-C) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.16:502-C 1. Saline waters-Oregon-Abert Lake. 2. Saline waters-Oregon-Summer Lake. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 502-C. QE75.P9 No. 502-C fGB1625.07) 557.3'08s f553'.72'0979593) 75-619062 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02689-9 CONTENTS P.1ge Page Abstract ... ..... ........ ....... .. .... ..... .. ....... ........ ........ ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .. C1 Solute bala!H"e ................................................................................... C10 Introduction ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Portion of South-Central Oregon
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 220 GEOLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES OF A PORTION OF SOUTH-CENTRAL OREGON BY GERALD A. WARING WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1908 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIKEOTOK WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 22O GEOLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES OF A PORTION OF SOUTH-CENTRAL OREGON BY GERALD A. WARING WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1908 CONTENTS. Vage. Introduction.............................................................. 7 Objects of reconnaissance.............................................. 7 Area examined........................................................ 7 Acknowledgements..................................................... 8 Previous study......................................................... 8 Geography................................................................. 9 General features....................................................... 9 Topography............................................................. 9 Mountains........................................................ 9 Scarps.............................................................. 9 Minor features..................................................... 10 Lakes.................................................................. 11 Character of the lakes................................................ 12 Alkalinity........................................................ 12 . Climate...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Lake Wildlife Area Management Plan
    SUMMER LAKE WILDLIFE AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN October 2007 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 3406 Cherry Avenue NE Salem, Oregon 97303 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose of the Plan ..................................................................................................... 4 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Mission and Authority ................................... 4 Purpose and Need of Summer Lake Wildlife Area ...................................................... 4 Wildlife Area Goals and Objectives ............................................................................. 6 Wildlife Area Establishment ......................................................................................... 7 Description and Environment ...................................................................................... 8 Physical Resources ................................................................................................... 8 Location ................................................................................................................... 8 Climate ..................................................................................................................... 8 Topography and Soils .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2012Sawareport.Pdf
    SAWA 2012 ANNUAL REPORT Former Arundo infestation mixed with native habitat on the mainstem in SAWA’s Hidden Valley project area. About SAWA For nearly 17 years, the Santa Ana Watershed Association (SAWA) and its partners have been promoting a healthy Santa Ana River watershed for the wildlife and the people who inhabit it. The watershed spans approximately 2,600 square miles and ranges in elevation from 11,500 feet to sea level through five distinctive life zones. The watershed lies in one of Earth’s 25 Biodiversity Hotspots—areas rich in flora and fauna that are threatened by human activity. A major goal of SAWA is to restore the natural functions of the watershed through the enhancement and restoration of the native riparian community. This is accomplished by the removal of exotic species and the management of existing resources, including both habitat and wildlife species. The largest thre at to the riparian habitat within the Santa Ana Watershed is takeover by invasive species, notably Arundo donax . This exotic plant is highly aggressive and has invaded much of the watershed, out-competing native vegetation and having drastic impacts on the wildlife. Removing Arundo is difficult and complex, requiring multiple treatments and intensive monitoring. SAWA’s comprehensive eradication efforts include identification and mapping of exotic species, initial biomass removal, post treatment, and intensive biological surveying during all stages of eradication. Most importantly, SAWA monitors the removal areas long after the Arundo has been eradicated to ensure that native vegetation and wildlife are recovering and that there is no return of the invasive species.
    [Show full text]