179 Genus Precis Huebner

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

179 Genus Precis Huebner AFROTROPICAL BUTTERFLIES 17th edition (2018). MARK C. WILLIAMS. http://www.lepsocafrica.org/?p=publications&s=atb Genus Precis Hübner, [1819] Hübner, 1819 in Hübner, [1816-[1826]. Verzeichniss bekannter Schmettlinge 33 (432 + 72 pp.). Augsburg. Type-species: Papilio octavia Cramer, by subsequent designation (Scudder, 1875. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 10: 256 (91-293).). The genus Precis belongs to the Family Nymphalidae Rafinesque, 1815; Subfamily Nymphalinae Rafinesque, 1815; Tribe Junoniini Reuter, 1896. The other genera in the Tribe Junoniini in the Afrotropical Region are Junonia, Salamis, Protogoniomorpha and Hypolimnas. Precis (Commodores) is a purely Afrotropical genus of 16 species, most closely related to the genus Hypolimnas (Wahlberg et al., 2005). Notwithstanding the arguments of De Lesse (1952) and Fontaine (1985), who clearly showed that they are distinct genera, Junonia and Precis have often been treated as congeneric. However, recent molecular work has conclusively shown that they are not only distinct genera, but that they are not even sister genera (Wahlberg et al., 2005; Williams 2007a). The genus is characterized by marked seasonal polyphenism, which is extreme in Precis octavia (see Williams, 2007a for a discussion and references). Relevant literature: Williams, 2007a [Differentiation from Junonia]. *Precis actia Distant, 1880 Air Commodore Male Air Commodore (Precis actia). Intermediate seasonal form. Katanga, DRC. Image courtesy Bertie Brink. Precis actia Distant, 1880 in Godman & Distant, 1880. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1880: 185 (182-185). Precis pelarga actia Distant, 1880. Dickson & Kroon, 1978. Precis actia Distant, 1880. Van Son, 1979. Precis pelarga actia Distant, 1880. Larsen, 1991c: 350. Precis (Precis) actia (Distant, 1880). Pringle et al., 1994: 120. Precis actia (Distant, 1880). Williams, 2007a. 1 Precis actia. Male (wet season form). Left – upperside; right – underside. Mount Muph, Democratic Republic of Congo. 12 February 1994. F. Venter. Images M.C.Williams ex J. Greyling Collection. Precis actia. Male, wet season form (Wingspan 43 mm). Left – upperside; right – underside. Maiwale Chowe, Malawi. 28 December 1997. N. Owen-Johnston. Images M.C. Williams ex Dobson Collection. Precis actia. Female (wet season form). Left – upperside; right – underside. Ndola, Zambia. 4 March 1999. Images M.C.Williams ex J. Greyling Collection. 2 Precis actia. Male (dry season form). Left – upperside; right – underside. Ndola, Zambia. 24 April 1998. Images M.C.Williams ex J. Greyling Collection. Precis actia. Female (dry season form). Left – upperside; right – underside. Ndola, Zambia. 24 April 1998. Images M.C.Williams ex J. Greyling Collection. Common name: Air Commodore. Type locality: [Tanzania]: “Massasi, East Africa”. Diagnosis: Very similar to Precis pelarga, from which it differs in the squarish post-discal patch in space 3 with the black dot placed in its centre (in pelarga the black dot is placed closer to its distal border) (Kielland, 1990d). The population from Kitesa Forest, Tanzania has white bands (Kielland, 1990d). Distribution: Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo (south), Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Kenya (west), Tanzania, Malawi, Zambia (north), Mozambique (west), Zimbabwe. Specific localities: Uganda – Semuliki N.P. (S. Forbes, pers. comm., 2017). Kenya – Kitale (Larsen, 1991c); Kakamega Forest (Larsen, 1991c); South Kavirondo (Larsen, 1991c). Tanzania – Massasi (TL); Dar-es-Salaam (Rothschild & Jordan,1903); Mhonda (Suffert, 1904); Kigoma to Tukuyu (Kielland, 1990d); Songea Region (Kielland, 1990d); Masagati Forest (Kielland, 1990d); Pugu Hills (Kielland, 1990d); the Uzungwa Range (Kielland, 1990d); Ukaguru Mountains (Kielland, 1990d); Rubeho Mountains (Kielland, 1990d); Image Mountain (Kielland, 1990d); Nguru Mountains (Kielland, 1990d); Nguu Mountains (Kielland, 1990d); Uluguru Mountains (Kielland, 1990d); Mikumi National Park (Kielland, 1990d); Ngorongoro Conservation Area (Kielland, 1990d); Ruaha National Park (Kielland, 1990d); Tabora Region (Kielland, 1990d); Kitesa Forest (Kielland, 1990d). Malawi – Mt Namuli (Congdon et al., 2010). Mozambique – vicinity of Garuso (Pringle et al., 1994); Mt Namuli (Congdon et al., 2010). Zimbabwe – Mazowe Valley (Pringle et al., 1994); Shabani (Pringle et al., 1994); Mutare (Pringle et al., 1994); Burma Valley (Pringle et al., 1994); Mapembi (Pringle et al., 1994); Laurenceville, Vumba 3 (male WSF illustrated above); Lomagundi (male DSF illustrated above). Habitat: Brachystegia woodland and savanna (Kielland, 1990d). Larsen (1991c) states that it occurs in forest. In Tanzania at altitudes from 250 to 2 000 m (Kielland, 1990d). Habits: Both sexes are attracted to flowers (Kielland, 1990d). At Mapembi, in March, fresh specimens of the dry-season form have been noted flying around the base of hills, occasionally feeding from flowers or mud-puddling, while worn specimens of the wet-season form were hilltopping on the same hills (the Cooksons, vide Pringle et al., 1994). Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Platostoma species (Lamiaceae) [Heath et al., 2002: 58]. Relevant literature: Richardson, 2013 [Distinction from Precis pelarga]. Note: Larsen (1991) says that actia and pelarga appear to intergrade in Kenya – he suggests that this supports the view that they are subspecies of a single species. vetula Staudinger, 1885 in Staudinger & Schatz, 1884-8 (as sp. of Precis). Exotischer Schmetterlinge 1: 101 (333 pp.). Bayern. [Tanzania]: “Zanzibar”. furcata Rothschild & Jordan, 1903 (as f. of Precis pelarga). Novitates Zoologicae 10: 516 (491-542). [Tanzania]: “Dar-es-Salaam”. albofasciata Suffert, 1904 (as ssp. of Precis pelarga). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, Iris 17: 108 (108-123). [Tanzania]: “Mhonda, Deusch [sic] - Ost - Africa”. rubrofasciata Suffert, 1904 (as ssp. of Precis actia). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, Iris 17: 109 (108- 123). [Tanzania]: “Mhonda”. *Precis andremiaja (Boisduval, 1833) Precis andremiaja. Female dry season form upperside (left) and underside (right). Images courtesy Raimund Schutte. Vanessa andremiaja Boisduval, 1833. Nouvelles Annales du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris 2: 193 (149-270). Precis andremiaja (Boisduval, 1833). Williams, 2007a. Type locality: Madagascar. Distribution: Madagascar. Specific localities: 4 Madagascar – Perinet Montadia forest and degraded surrounds (R. Schutte, pers. comm. April 2010). Habitat: Occurs on forest margins and in anthropogenic environments (Lees et al., 2003). Habits: A very common resident with a variety of underside cryptic colour schemes. Observed mud puddling and on fresh carnivore dung, as well as fond of garden flowers (R. Schutte, pers. comm. April 2010). Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. musa Guérin-Méneville, 1844 (as sp. of Vanessa). Iconographie du règne animal de G. Cuvier. Insectes 474 (576 pp.). Paris. Madagascar. boisduvali Staudinger, 1885 in Staudinger & Schatz, 1884-8 (as sp. of Precis). Exotischer Schmetterlinge 1: 100 (333 pp.). Bayern. Madagascar. *Precis antilope (Feisthamel, 1850)# Darker Commodore Darker Commodore (Precis antilope). Wet season form (left) and dry season form (right). Images courtesy Raimund Schutte. Salamis antilope Feisthamel, 1850. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (2) 8: 250 (247-262). Precis simia Wallengren, 1857. Trimen & Bowker, 1887a. [Synonym of Precis antilope] Precis antilope Feisthamel. Swanepoel, 1953a. Precis antilope (Feisthamel, 1850). Dickson & Kroon, 1978. Precis (Precis) antilope (Feisthamel, 1850). Pringle et al., 1994: 120. Precis antilope (Feisthamel, 1850). Williams, 2007a. 5 Precis antilope. Male, wet season form (Wingspan 43 mm). Left – upperside; right – underside. Thabazimbi, Limpopo, South Africa. 1 April 2009. J. Dobson. Images M.C. Williams ex Dobson Collection. Precis antilope. Female, wet season form (Wingspan 53 mm). Left – upperside; right – underside. Loding, Mpumalanga, South Africa. 9 February 2010. J. Dobson. Images M.C. Williams ex Dobson Collection. Precis antilope. Male dry season form (Wingspan 53 mm). Left – upperside; right – underside. Thabazimbi, Limpopo Province, South Africa. 27 April 2008. M. Williams. Images M.C. Williams ex Williams Collection. Precis antilope. Female dry season form (Wingspan 58 mm). Left – upperside; right – underside. Thabazimbi, Limpopo Province, South Africa. 27 April 2008. M. Williams. Images M.C. Williams ex Williams Collection. 6 Type locality: Senegal: “Cazamance”. Diagnosis: Similar to Precis cuama but is smaller (Pringle et al., 1994). Distribution: Most of Sub-Saharan Africa, including Senegal, Gambia, Guinea-Bissau (Bacelar, 1949), Guinea, Sierra Leone, Ivory Coast, Ghana, Benin, Nigeria (south and Cross River loop), Gabon, Ethiopia, Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Botswana, Namibia (central and north), South Africa (Limpopo Province, Mpumalanga, North West Province, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal), Swaziland. Also in southwestern Arabia (Yemen) (Larsen, 1991c) and on Annobon Island, Equatorial Guinea (D’Abrera, 2004: in Errata, 2005). Specific localities: Senegal – Basse Casamance (TL). Ghana – Boabeng-Fiema Monkey Sanctuary (Larsen et al. 2009). Benin – Houeyogbe Forest (Coache & Rainon, 2016). Nigeria – Okwangwo (Larsen, 2005a). Gabon – Ekouyi (Vande weghe, 2010); camp PPG (Vande weghe, 2010); Franceville (Vande weghe, 2010). Uganda – Semuliki N.P. (Davenport & Howard, 1996). Kenya – Widespread (Larsen, 1991c). Tanzania – Widespread
Recommended publications
  • MADAGASCAR: the Wonders of the “8Th Continent” a Tropical Birding Custom Trip
    MADAGASCAR: The Wonders of the “8th Continent” A Tropical Birding Custom Trip October 20—November 6, 2016 Guide: Ken Behrens All photos taken during this trip by Ken Behrens Annotated bird list by Jerry Connolly TOUR SUMMARY Madagascar has long been a core destination for Tropical Birding, and with the opening of a satellite office in the country several years ago, we further solidified our expertise in the “Eighth Continent.” This custom trip followed an itinerary similar to that of our main set-departure tour. Although this trip had a definite bird bias, it was really a general natural history tour. We took our time in observing and photographing whatever we could find, from lemurs to chameleons to bizarre invertebrates. Madagascar is rich in wonderful birds, and we enjoyed these to the fullest. But its mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and insects are just as wondrous and accessible, and a trip that ignored them would be sorely missing out. We also took time to enjoy the cultural riches of Madagascar, the small villages full of smiling children, the zebu carts which seem straight out of the Middle Ages, and the ingeniously engineered rice paddies. If you want to come to Madagascar and see it all… come with Tropical Birding! Madagascar is well known to pose some logistical challenges, especially in the form of the national airline Air Madagascar, but we enjoyed perfectly smooth sailing on this tour. We stayed in the most comfortable hotels available at each stop on the itinerary, including some that have just recently opened, and savored some remarkably good food, which many people rank as the best Madagascar Custom Tour October 20-November 6, 2016 they have ever had on any birding tour.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • African Butterfly News!
    LATE WINTER EDITION: JULY / AUGUST AFRICAN 2017-4 THE BUTTERFLY LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY OF AFRICA NEWS LATEST NEWS Welcome to the Late Winter edition of African Butterfly News! African Butterfly News celebrates its first year of existence; the first edition, 2016-5, was circulated in September last year. The photographic competition commenced in August 2016, so the annual award will be made in the next, Spring Edition – for purposes of the photographic competition, the season starts in August and ends in July. A reminder that the newsletter is circulated every two months: Late Summer (January and February) – circulated in January Autumn (March and April) – circulated in March Early Winter (May and June) – circulated in May Late Winter (July and August) – circulated in July Spring (September and October) – circulated in September Early Summer (November and December) – circulated in November You will all be aware of the devastating fires that the southern Cape experienced in June. Dave and Hanna Edge, LepSoc Africa’s Treasurer and Membership Secretary respectively, were caught up in this drama, and had to evacuate their house (refer to Dave’s eyewitness account below). Fortunately, the building survived the fire, although the nearby Brenton Blue Reserve was incinerated. All fences, sign boards and marker-posts were destroyed – it is hoped that some larvae or pupae of the Brenton Blue (Orachrysops niobe) are still alive, safely underground. See a report under COREL under the “Projects” section. Some of you may have seen an article in the Sunday Times, by Aaron Hyman, a friend of Christopher Dobson. This magazine relies on material from you, the members of LepSoc Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Howdy, Bugfans, the Buckeye (Precis Coenia) Belongs to The
    Howdy, BugFans, The Buckeye (Precis coenia) belongs to the Order Lepidoptera (“scaled wings”) which includes the butterflies and the moths. Of the 12,000 species of Lepidoptera in North America north of Mexico, only about 700 are butterflies. In common, along with the usual six-legs-three-body-parts insect stuff, moths and butterflies have four wings that are covered with easily-rubbed-off scales (the upper surface of a butterfly’s wing often has a different pattern then the lower surface does), and mouthparts in the form of a coiled tube called a proboscis that is used for feeding on liquids like nectar and sap. They do Complete Metamorphosis, moving from egg to larva (caterpillar) to pupa (in a chrysalis or cocoon) to adult. Caterpillars chew; butterflies and moths sip. General rules for telling them apart are that butterflies sit with their wings held out to the side or folded vertically above their bodies, and moths hold their wings flat over or wrapped around their body. Butterflies have a thickened tip/knob on the end of their antennae; moths’ antennae may be bare or feathery, but are never knobbed. Butterflies are active by day (the BugLady has some night-feeding Northern Pearly-eyes who haven’t read that part of the rulebook); moths are generally active in late afternoon and through the night. Some day-flying moths have bright colors, but as a group, moths tend to be drab. Because of their pigmented and/or prismatic scales, many butterflies are the definition of the word “dazzling.” Buckeyes belong in the “Brush-footed butterfly” family, a large group of strong fliers whose front legs are noticeably hairy and are reduced in size (leading to a nickname – “four-footed butterflies”).
    [Show full text]
  • Duke University Dissertation Template
    Evolutionary trends in phenotypic elements of seasonal forms of the tribe Junoniini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) by Jameson Wells Clarke Department of Biology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ H. Fred Nijhout, Ph.D., Supervisor ___________________________ V. Louise Roth, Ph.D. ___________________________ Sonke Johnsen, Ph.D. Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Biology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 i v ABSTRACT Evolutionary trends in phenotypic elements of seasonal forms of the tribe Junoniini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) by Jameson Wells Clarke Department of Biology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ H. Fred Nijhout, Ph.D., Supervisor ___________________________ V. Louise Roth, Ph.D. ___________________________ Sonke Johnsen, Ph.D. An abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Biology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 Copyright by Jameson Wells Clarke 2017 Abstract Seasonal polyphenism in insects is the phenomenon whereby multiple phenotypes can arise from a single genotype depending on environmental conditions during development. Many butterflies have multiple generations per year, and environmentally induced variation in wing color pattern phenotype allows them to develop adaptations to the specific season in which the adults live. Elements of butterfly
    [Show full text]
  • Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation
    Darwin Initiative Award 15/036: Monitoring and Managing Biodiversity Loss in South-East Africa's Montane Ecosystems MT MABU, MOZAMBIQUE: BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION November 2012 Jonathan Timberlake, Julian Bayliss, Françoise Dowsett-Lemaire, Colin Congdon, Bill Branch, Steve Collins, Michael Curran, Robert J. Dowsett, Lincoln Fishpool, Jorge Francisco, Tim Harris, Mirjam Kopp & Camila de Sousa ABRI african butterfly research in Forestry Research Institute of Malawi Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 2 Front cover: Main camp in lower forest area on Mt Mabu (JB). Frontispiece: View over Mabu forest to north (TT, top); Hermenegildo Matimele plant collecting (TT, middle L); view of Mt Mabu from abandoned tea estate (JT, middle R); butterflies (Lachnoptera ayresii) mating (JB, bottom L); Atheris mabuensis (JB, bottom R). Photo credits: JB – Julian Bayliss CS ‒ Camila de Sousa JT – Jonathan Timberlake TT – Tom Timberlake TH – Tim Harris Suggested citation: Timberlake, J.R., Bayliss, J., Dowsett-Lemaire, F., Congdon, C., Branch, W.R., Collins, S., Curran, M., Dowsett, R.J., Fishpool, L., Francisco, J., Harris, T., Kopp, M. & de Sousa, C. (2012). Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation. Report produced under the Darwin Initiative Award 15/036. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London. 94 pp. Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 3 LIST OF CONTENTS List of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of the Mechanism of Phenotypic Plasticity in Satyrid Butterfly Eyespots
    SHORT REPORT Origin of the mechanism of phenotypic plasticity in satyrid butterfly eyespots Shivam Bhardwaj1†*, Lim Si-Hui Jolander2, Markus R Wenk1,2, Jeffrey C Oliver3, H Frederik Nijhout4, Antonia Monteiro1,5* 1Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; 2Department of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; 3Office of Digital Innovation & Stewardship, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States; 4Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, United States; 5Yale-NUS College, Singapore, Singapore Abstract Plasticity is often regarded as a derived adaptation to help organisms survive in variable but predictable environments, however, we currently lack a rigorous, mechanistic examination of how plasticity evolves in a large comparative framework. Here, we show that phenotypic plasticity in eyespot size in response to environmental temperature observed in Bicyclus anynana satyrid butterflies is a complex derived adaptation of this lineage. By reconstructing the evolution of known physiological and molecular components of eyespot size plasticity in a comparative framework, we showed that 20E titer plasticity in response to temperature is a pre-adaptation shared by all butterfly species examined, whereas expression of EcR in eyespot centers, and eyespot sensitivity to 20E, are both derived traits found only in a *For correspondence: subset of species with eyespots. [email protected] (SB); [email protected] (AM) Introduction Present address: †Department
    [Show full text]
  • BUTTERFLIES of the CHYULU RANGE. a Systematic List of the Species Taken by the Museum Expedition to the Hills
    PART 3. BUTTERFLIES OF THE CHYULU RANGE. A systematic list of the species taken by the Museum Expedition to the Hills. April-July, 1938. By V. G. L. VAN SOMEREN,F.L.S., F.R.E.S., Etc. INTRODUCTION. The following account of the Lepidoptera (Rhopaloc.era) taken by members of the Museum Expedition to the Chyulu Range, is mainly a systematic list of the species obtained. At the time of the visit, April to July, 1938 (that is just toward the end, and after the long rains) insect life was remark• ably scarce, and although systematic search was made over all portions of the hills from 3,000 to 7,000 feet, at no time were butterflies numerous. The material taken can be considered representative of the range for that particular season, but there is little doubt that insect life would be more plentiful just after the short rains, as it undoubtedly is on the surrounding plains, especially in the Kibwezi- Voi areas. In spite of the paucity of insect life, certain new records have been established, thus Papilio hornimani is recorded for the first time from within Kenya boundaries, although known for many years to inhabit the forests of Mt. Kilimanjaro. Charaxes ful• vescens nr. acuminatus, also of Tanganyika, was taken on the range. Two new races of Liptenines of the genus Pentila are recorded, whilst a new ACTaea,a new Papilio, and a new race of Amauris are described. The Lepidoptera collected have a definite relationship to the vegetational zones and the distribution of certain plant species at various altitudes and portions of the hills.
    [Show full text]
  • The Butterflies of Taita Hills
    FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS A FIELD GUIDE Esther N. Kioko, Alex M. Musyoki, Augustine E. Luanga, Oliver C. Genga & Duncan K. Mwinzi FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS: THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS A FIELD GUIDE TO THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS Esther N. Kioko, Alex M. Musyoki, Augustine E. Luanga, Oliver C. Genga & Duncan K. Mwinzi Supported by the National Museums of Kenya and the JRS Biodiversity Foundation ii FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS: THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS Dedication In fond memory of Prof. Thomas R. Odhiambo and Torben B. Larsen Prof. T. R. Odhiambo’s contribution to insect studies in Africa laid a concrete footing for many of today’s and future entomologists. Torben Larsen’s contribution to the study of butterflies in Kenya and their natural history laid a firm foundation for the current and future butterfly researchers, enthusiasts and rearers. National Museums of Kenya’s mission is to collect, preserve, study, document and present Kenya’s past and present cultural and natural heritage. This is for the purposes of enhancing knowledge, appreciation, respect and sustainable utilization of these resources for the benefit of Kenya and the world, for now and posterity. Copyright © 2021 National Museums of Kenya. Citation Kioko, E. N., Musyoki, A. M., Luanga, A. E., Genga, O. C. & Mwinzi, D. K. (2021). Fluttering beauty with benefits: The butterflies of Taita Hills. A field guide. National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya. ISBN 9966-955-38-0 iii FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS: THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS FOREWORD The Taita Hills are particularly diverse but equally endangered.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    LIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA COLLECTED IN EAST AFRICA, 1894, BY :\IR. WILLIAM ASTOR CHAXLER AND LIEUTEN- ANT LUDWIG- YON HOHNEL. By W. J. Holland, Pli. D. The collection submitted to me for examination and determination by the authorities of the United States National Museum had already been partially classified by Mr. Martin L. Linell, of the Department of Entomology. Twenty-five species recorded in the accompanying: list were not represented in the assemblage of specimens submitted to me, Mr. Linell having determined them, as he writes me, ujion careful com- parison with specimens previously labeled by me in other collections contained in the National Museum. The species thus determined by Mr. Linell, which I have not personally examined, and for the correct determination of which I rely uj^on him, are Papilio leonidas, P. nireuSj P. demoleus, Salamis anacardii, Palla varanes, Amauris domimcanus, HypoUmnas misipims^ Banais j)eUv€rana^ D. l-Iugii, Tingra momhasa'f Precis nataliea, P. elgiva, P. cloantha, Eupha'dra neophron, Melanitis leda, Hamanumidii dcvdalus, Pyrameis cardui, Euryiela dryope, E. hiar- has, E. ophione, Hypanis ilithyia, Junonia boopis, J. eehrene, J, clelia, (JalUdryas floreUa, Terias regularis, and Gydllgramma lutona. As to the exact localities from which the specimens came, I Lave no certain knowledge. Mr. Linell writes that he was informed by Mr. Chanler that the greater number of the specimens were taken upon the Jombene Range, northeast of Mount Kenia. It is to be regretted that a more exact record of localities and dates of capture was not kept. An examination of the list shows that while a certain proportion of the species therein enumerated have a wide range over the whole of tropical Africa, a much larger proportion are such as belong to the faunal subdivision which includes the region covered by Natal and the Transvaal.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum, Vol
    LIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA COLLECTED IN SOMALI-LAND, EAST AFRICA, BY MR. WILLIAM ASTOR CHANLER AND LIEUTENANT VON IICEHNEL. By W. J. Holland, Ph. D. xVccordinCt to informatiou given me by the authorities of the National Museum, the collections before me consist of two lots, the first contained in two boxes, and representing specimens captured in tlie region of the Tana River, uiDon the journey from the coast to Hameye; and the sec- ond, contained in one box, representing collections made solely by Mr. Chanler, but taken upon practically the same territory. The specimens are not always in good condition, and in many cases represent, as the following list will show, species which are common in collections. Suborder RHOPALOCERA. SulDfaiTiily DA-NA-IN".^:. Genus DANAIS, Latreille. DANAIS CHRYSIPPUS, Linnaeus. One typical male, labeled " Tana River." DANAIS CHRYSIPPUS, Linnaeus, var. KLUGII, Butler. Thirty-two examples, one male with the secondaries white, as in the variety Alcippus. DANAIS PETIVERANA, Doubleday. *' One example, from the Tana River. * SubfaiTLily SA.T YRIISTJE. Genus MELANITIS, Fabricius. MELANITIS LEDA, Linnaeus, var. SOLANDRA, Fabricius. One specimen. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, Vol. XVIII—No. 1063. 259 260 J.EPIDOPTEBA FROM SOMALI-LAXD— HOLLAND. vol. xviii. Genus YPHTHIMA, Hubner. YPHTHIMA CHANLERI, new species. Upper side brown, paler toward the outer margin and the apex. The ocellar tract is not separated in any way from the adjacent portion of the wings, the brown color shading by imperceptible degrees from the base, where it is almost black, to the outer margin, where the wings are pale wood-brown.
    [Show full text]
  • Wing Shape and Flight Behaviour in Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea): a Preliminary Analysis
    J. exp. Biol. 138, 271-288 (1988) 271 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1988 WING SHAPE AND FLIGHT BEHAVIOUR IN BUTTERFLIES (LEPIDOPTERA: PAPILIONOIDEA AND HESPERIOIDEA): A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS BY C. R. BETTS* AND R. J. WOOTTON Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter Accepted 8 March 1988 Summary Representatives of six butterfly species, flying freely in the field or in simulated field conditions, were filmed with a high-speed cin6 camera and subjected to kinematic and morphometric analysis. This is the first detailed investigation on an insect performing the varied patterns of 'natural' flight. Kinematic parameters in representative sequences of selected flight modes were calculated and compared, and wing shapes were characterized using aspect ratio and non-dimensional moment parameters. The analyses and field observations of these and other butterflies suggest possible correlations between flight performance and wing shape. The behaviour of individual species conforms reasonably well with crude predictions based on aspect ratio, wing loading and wing inertia. Introduction Although several investigations have been carried out on the relationships between form and function in insect wings (e.g. R. A. Norberg, 1975; Pfau, 1978; Wootton, 1981; Newman, 1982; Brodsky & Ivanov, 1983; Betts, 1986a,b,c; Newman & Wootton, 1986), the significance of wing shape (= planform) has been neglected. In contrast, in birds and bats active work on this aspect is in progress (U. M. Norberg, 1981; U. M. Norberg & Rayner, 1987; Rayner, 1987). We have carried out a preliminary investigation on a small sample of a selection of butterfly species. Butterflies were chosen because of their diversity of size, wing shape and flight pattern, and because their large size and low wing beat frequencies make them relatively easy to film with a portable high-speed cin6 camera in the field or in large enclosures, for later kinematic analysis.
    [Show full text]