EPK-Nandi-Biodiv Final1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EPK-Nandi-Biodiv Final1 Biodiversity Survey EPK Estates, Nandi Hills, Kenya Papilio rex, The King Swallowtail – Kenya’s largest butterfly species. FINAL REPORT Dino J. Martins Insect Committee of Nature Kenya The East Africa Natural History Society CONTENTS PAGE: BIODIVERSITY OVERVIEW 3 CHECKLIST OF THE BUTTERFLIES 6 CHECKLIST OF THE DRAGONFLIES 13 CHECKLIST OF THE BIRDS 16 FLORA SURVEY 22 LIST OF TREES, SHRUBS AND LIANAS 23 LIST OF WILDFLOWERS 26 2 BIODIVERSITY OVERVIEW The indigenous forest patches of the Nandi Hills are an important area for biodiversity in Kenya. The forests are considered one of the ‘IBAs’ (Important Bird Areas) of Eastern Africa and two of these areas have been listed as IBAs: The North Nandi and the South Nandi Forests. The preliminary survey has yielded a total of 891 species of native plants and animals (birds, butterflies and dragonflies) from the forest patches on the estates. This species tally is expected to rise significantly as the surveys continued and over 1000 species of flora and fauna are likely to be recorded from the target groups being studied with further monitoring over the longer term. Surveys of the forests over the past year (2010) have yielded a checklist of 125 butterfly species, 47 dragonflies and damselflies, 247 bird species, 96 trees, shrubs and lianas, and 376 wildflowers and herbs. The bird diversity so far recorded represents around 22 % of the total bird diversity of Kenya. This is a significant figure and includes many Western Kenya forest-dependent species such as the Black-and-White Casqued Hornbill (found in all the main forest patches on most of the estates). There is great potential to develop birding tourism at the Nandi EPK estates indigenous forests and wetlands. The butterfly figure of 125 represents about 15 % of the total Kenyan diversity. It is expected that these forests hold more diversity and the continuing surveys will yield a checklist of around 300 species. The forests of the EPK estates are an important site for butterfly diversity and include some of the rarer species known in Kenya, such as Ansorge’s Charaxes (Charaxes ansorgei) found along the trails to Kibabet. The fauna of the forests is closely linked to that of the North Nandi Forest and the Western Mau Highland forest area for most of the higher altitude areas of the estates. The western estates, such as Sitoi, have a fauna that is more typical of the rainforest, similar to that of Kakamega forest. For example, a butterfly that is typically only found in Kakamega forest, Vanessula milca, was found to be common at the Sitoi forest patch. Dragonflies and damselflies encountered represented about 37 % of the total known Kenya diversity. This is a significant number and indicates that the wetland and swamp areas are an important zone for continued protection and restoration. The plant diversity represents about 8 % of the total plant diversity known from Kenya. Many of the plant species were typical of evergreen highland forest and the lower- altitude estates had species more allied to Kakamega Forest. 3 Below is a chart summarising the percentage distribution of the species encountered during the survey by the major groups: Birds; 28% Birds Butterlies Flora; 53% Dragonlies Flora Butterlies; 14% Dragonlies; 5% Setting priority areas for conservation and restoration The following table highlights the estates that were deemed to be the most important and biodiverse areas for each of the major groups of plants and animals surveyed: Taxon group Estates Butterflies Kibabet, Chemomi, Sitoi, Kapsumbeiwa Dragonflies All wetlands, Kibabet, Kapsumbeiwa, Sitoi, Chemomi, Siret Birds All wetlands, Kibabet, Kapsumbeiwa, Sitoi, Chemomi, Siret Flora Kibabet, Kapsumbeiwa, Sitoi, Chemomi, Siret It is recommended that these areas be given priority for protection and restoration. They hold significant areas of natural vegetation and biodiversity including many species that are restricted to Western Kenya. 4 © Dino J. Martins Insect Committee of Nature Kenya [email protected] www.naturekenya.org http://dududiaries.wildlifedirect.org/ Insect Committee of Nature Kenya The East Africa Natural History Society Museum Hill, Nairobi, Kenya. 5 RESULTS OF THE SURVEY OF THE BUTTERFLIES The survey of butterflies was conducted by walking through the forest along trails and transects as well as careful observation of insects along streams and rivers. Butterflies were identified by sight records for the case of common/well-known species. Limited netting was done using a hand-net of species that were less well-known or provided the basis for more interesting records. Photography of free-living individuals and recently captured individuals was also conducted as an aid to identification. A total of 125 different butterfly species were observed during the survey. This figure represents about 15 % of the total Kenyan butterfly fauna. The butterflies observed came from five different families within the order Lepidoptera. This is a significant number of species for a forest area that is mostly fragmented. The butterfly fauna was primarily composed of central and western species. The butterfly fauna indicates that the range falls within the broader Nandi-Kakamega area of endemism. Swallowtail butterflies (Papilionidae), which are the largest and among the most spectacular of Kenyan insects were well-represented in the forest. These included the largest butterfly in Kenya, the Regal or King Swallowtail (Papilio rex), which is a species typical of tall less-disturbed forest. Whites and yellows (Pieridae) were also found to be common throughout the forest. The Brush-footed butterflies (Nymphalidae) were well-represented comprising almost half of the total butterfly diversity found during the survey. This large and diverse group included the fast-flying Charaxes or Emperor butterflies: The Green-Veined Charaxes was the most common. Large numbers of the were observed along forest trails. The rare Ansorges’ Charaxes was seen along the trails to Kibabet and the purple mother of pearl butterfly, more typical of Kakamega forest, Salamis temora, was seen at Sitio. The Blues and Coppers (Lycaenidae) were fewer than expected given the high diversity that is typical of this family. All of the lycaenids that were observed were fairly common species. Many of the rarer and more localised species of this butterfly family associate with ants, and are often only on the wing as adult butterflies for limited periods of time each year. Therefore, this is one butterfly family where more diversity is expected through longer-term and more focused monitoring. Skippers (Hesperiidae) were fairly common and distributed throughout the forest and glades. As with the lycaenids, this is one group of butterflies where more species are likely to turn up through longer-term monitoring. It is expected that further monitoring can raise the number of species of butterflies recorded to around 200-300 species. 6 Checklist of the Butterflies of the EPK Estates, Nandi Hills, Kenya: Scientific name Common Name 1. Papilio rex Regal swallowtail 2. P. dardanus Mocker swallowtail 3. P. phorcas Green-Banded swallowtail 4. P. nobilis Noble swallowtail 5. P. mackinnoni MacKinnon’s swallowtail 6. P. nireus Narrow green-banded swallowtail 7. P. demodocus Citrus swallowtail 8. P. jacksoni Jackson’s swallowtail 9. Graphium policenes Small striped swordtail 10. Catopsilia florella African emigrant 11. Eurema hecabe Common grass yellow 12. E. desjardinsi Angled grass yellow 13. Nepheronia thalassina Blue vagrant 14. Colotis ione Purple tip 15. C. euippe Orange tip 16. Belenois aurota Brown-veined white 17. Belenois thysa False dotted border 18. Belenois creona Common white 19. Leptosia alcesta inalcesta Wood white 20. Mylothris sagala Dusky dotted border 21. Mylothris agathina Eastern dotted border 22. Mimacraea marshalli Marshall’s Acraea mimic 23. Baliochila fragilis The buff 24. Lachnocnema bibulus Woolly legs 25. Myrina dermaptera Lesser fig tree blue 26. Hypolycaena philippus Common hairstreak 27. Deudorix antalus Brown playboy 28. Lycaena phlaeas abboti Small copper 29. Anthene definita Ciliate blue 30. Anthene crawshawyi Crawshay’s ciliate blue 31. Cupidopsis iobates Tailed meadow blue 32. Lampides boeticus Pea blue 33. Phylaria cyara tenuimarginata 34. Cacyreus lingeus Common bush blue 35. Leptotes pirithous Common zebra blue 36. Zizeeria knysna African grass blue 37. Zizina abtanossa Dark grass blue 38. Zizula hylax Tiny grass blue 39. Actizera lucida lucida Rayed blue 40. Actizera stellata Clover blue 41. Azanus jesous African babul blue 7 42. Eicochrysops hippocrates White-tipped blue 43. Euchrysops malathana Smoky bean cupid 44. Euchrysops osiris African cupid 45. Freyeria trochylus trochylus Grass jewel 46. Libythea labdaca African snout 47. Danaus chrysippus African queen 48. Tirumala petiverana African blue tiger 49. Amauris albimaculata Layman 50. Gnophodes betsimena Banded evening brown 51. Melanitis leda leda Common evening brown 52. Bicyclus safitza safitza Common bush brown 53. Henotesia perspicua Swamp patroller 54. Neocoenyra gregorii 55. Ypthima asterope asterope Common three-ring 56. Ypthima impure paupera Impure ringlet 57. Charaxes varanes Pearl charaxes 58. Charaxes candiope Green-veined charaxes 59. Charaxes castor Giant charaxes 60. Charaxes brutus White barred charaxes 61. Charaxes pollux Black-bordered charaxes 62. Charaxes druceanus Silver barred charaxes 63. Charaxes cithaeron Blue spotted charaxes 64. Charaxes nandina Highland blue charaxes 65. Charaxes kirki Kirk’s charaxes
Recommended publications
  • DNA Barcoding Cannot Reliably Identify Species of the Blowfly Genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae)
    DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae). T. L. Whitworth, R. D. Dawson, Hélène Magalon, E. Baudry To cite this version: T. L. Whitworth, R. D. Dawson, Hélène Magalon, E. Baudry. DNA barcoding cannot reli- ably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae).. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Royal Society, The, 2007, 274 (1619), pp.1731-1739. 10.1098/rspb.2007.0062. hal-00941689 HAL Id: hal-00941689 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00941689 Submitted on 6 May 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae) T. L. Whitworth1, R. D. Dawson2, H. Magalon3 and E. Baudry4,* 1Washington State University, 2533 Inter Avenue, Puyallup, WA 98372, USA 2University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia V2N 4Z9, Canada 3Laboratoire d’Ecologie, Universite´ Paris VI, Paris 75252, France 4Laboratoire Ecologie, Systematique et Evolution, Universite´ Paris-Sud, Baˆtiment 362, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France In DNA barcoding, a short standardized DNA sequence is used to assign unknown individuals to species and aid in the discovery of new species.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Abantis Hopffer, 1855 in Angola and Description of a New Species (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae, Pyrginae) SHILAP Revista De Lepidopterología, Vol
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Mendes, L. F.; Bivar de Sousa, A. The genus Abantis Hopffer, 1855 in Angola and description of a new species (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae, Pyrginae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 37, núm. 147, septiembre, 2009, pp. 313-318 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45515238007 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 313-318 The genus Abantis Hopff 7/9/09 17:41 Página 313 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 37 (147), septiembre 2009: 313-318 CODEN: SRLPEF ISSN:0300-5267 The genus Abantis Hopffer, 1855 in Angola and description of a new species (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae, Pyrginae)* L. F. Mendes & A. Bivar de Sousa Abstract One new species of the genus Abantis Hopffer, 1855 is described from Angola (Moxico Province) and compared with the most similar ones - main differences concern the wings shape, dorsal wing pattern and shape of the valves of genitalia; new data are presented relatively to other species of the same genus known to fly in the country. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae, Pyrginae, Abantis, new species, new data, Angola. El género Abantis Hopffer, 1855 en Angola y descripción de una especie nueva (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae, Pyrginae) Resumen Se describe una nueva especie del género Abantis Hopffer, 1855 procedente de Angola (Provincia de Moxico) y se compara con las especies conocidas más parecidas - las principales diferencias respecto a la forma y el color dorsal de las alas y la morfología de las valvas de la genitalia; se presentan nuevos datos relativos a otras especies del mismo género conocidas en el país.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolbachia Endosymbiont Infection in Two Indian Butterflies and Female-Biased Sex Ratio in the Red Pierrot, Talicada Nyseus
    Wolbachia endosymbiont infection in two Indian butterflies and female-biased sex ratio in the Red Pierrot, Talicada nyseus 1 2 1, KUNAL ANKOLA , DOROTHEA BRUECKNER and HP PUTTARAJU * 1Division of Biological Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, Bangalore University, Bangalore, India 2Department of Biology, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany *Corresponding author (Email, [email protected]) The maternally inherited obligate bacteria Wolbachia is known to infect various lepidopteran insects. However, so far only a few butterfly species harbouring this bacterium have been thoroughly studied. The current study aims to identify the infection status of these bacteria in some of the commonly found butterfly species in India. A total of nine butterfly species belonging to four different families were screened using PCR with Wolbachia-specific wsp and ftsZ primers. The presence of the Wolbachia super group ‘B’ in the butterflies Red Pierrot, Talicada nyseus (Guerin) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and Blue Mormon, Papilio polymnestor Cramer (Papilionidae), is documented for the first time in India. The study also gives an account on the lifetime fecundity and female-biased sex ratio in T. nyseus, suggesting a putative role for Wolbachia in the observed female-biased sex ratio distortion. [Ankola K, Brueckner D and Puttaraju HP 2011 Wolbachia endosymbiont infection in two Indian butterflies and female-biased sex ratio in the Red Pierrot, Talicada nyseus. J. Biosci. 36 845–850] DOI:10.1007/s12038-011-9149-3 1. Introduction infected by Wolbachia. It has been shown that the presence of particular clades of Wolbachia cause feminization and The maternally inherited endosymbiotic α–proteobacteria cytoplasmic incompatibility in the common grass yellow called Wolbachia is known to infect 15%–75% of insect butterfly, Eurema hecabe (Hiroki et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Seismic Reflection Survey and Well Drilling, Umkhanyakude District Municipality, Northern Kzn
    SFG1897 v2 Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SEISMIC REFLECTION SURVEY AND WELL DRILLING, UMKHANYAKUDE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN KZN Public Disclosure Authorized Client: SANEDI–SACCCS Consultant: G.A. Botha (PhD, Pr.Sci.Nat) in association with specialist consultants; Brousse-James and Associates, WetRest, Jeffares & Green, S. Allan Council for Geoscience, P.O. Box 900, Pietermaritzburg, 3200 Council for Geoscience report: 2016-0009 June, 2016 Copyright © Council for Geoscience, 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Project description ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Location and regional context ....................................................................................................... 5 2.2 2D seismic reflection survey and well drilling; project description and technical aspects ............ 7 2.2.1 Seismic survey (vibroseis) process ....................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Well drilling ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Anax Ephippiger
    25. D ESCRIPTIVE C ATALOGUE : F AMILY AESHNIDAE Anax ephippiger Photo: Pablo Martínez-Darve Sanz Length: From 61 to 70 mm. Hindwing spam: From 43 to 48 mm. Male: 1. Two black bold lines on the frons. 2. The upper part of the eyes is brown and the lower green. 3. Brown thorax. 4. Only the upper part of the S2 is blue, and this colour spreads up to the middle of the sides. 5. Abdomen is light brown or yellowish with a black stripe that stretches across it. 6. Long pointed anal appendages. 7. There is a yellow spot on the hindwing. Female: They are similar to males in patterns, but S2 is normally duller and the blue colour on S2 is not as bright or it does not exist. There is a black stripe that goes across the abdomen. (8) Photo: Roberto Scherini 102 DRAGONFLIES • GR - 249 Great Málaga Path in Málaga and the Province D ESCRIPTIVE C ATALOGUE : F AMILY AESHNIDAE 25. HABITAT It can be found in all kinds of habitats, whether they are bodies of water or not, as this is a migratory species. It is unknown if there is a breeding spot this species has in the Province of Málaga, but they are likely to mate in standing water bodies with plenty of vegetation on the riverbank (above all rushes and bulrushes). These can be perennial or temporary, such as small reservoirs and dams, artificial ponds, deserted quarries and polls in rivers and streams. WAY OF LIFE This species migrates from Africa and the Mediterranean to a large part of Europe, where it reaches Iceland (only this Odonata from that country has been seen here).
    [Show full text]
  • NABRO Ecological Analysts CC Natural Asset and Botanical Resource Ordinations Environmental Consultants & Wildlife Specialists
    NABRO Ecological Analysts CC Natural Asset and Botanical Resource Ordinations Environmental Consultants & Wildlife Specialists ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE REPORT FOR HANS HOHEISEN WILDLIFE RESEARCH STATION Compiled by Ben Orban, PriSciNat. June 2013 NABRO Ecological Analysts CC. - Reg No: 16549023 / PO Box 11644, Hatfield, Pretoria. Our reference: NABRO / HHWRS/V01 NABRO Ecological Analysts CC Natural Asset and Botanical Resource Ordinations Environmental Consultants & Wildlife Specialists CONTENTS 1 SPECIALIST INVESTIGATORS ............................................................................... 3 2 DECLARATION ............................................................................................................ 3 3 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 3 4 LOCALITY OF STUDY AREA .................................................................................... 4 4.1 Location ................................................................................................................... 4 5 INFRASTRUCTURE ..................................................................................................... 4 5.1 Fencing ..................................................................................................................... 4 5.2 Camps ...................................................................................................................... 4 5.3 Buildings ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Lepidopterans of Visakhapatnam Region, Andhra Pradesh, India
    ANALYSIS Vol. 21, Issue 68, 2020 ANALYSIS ARTICLE ISSN 2319–5746 EISSN 2319–5754 Species Contribution to the Lepidopterans of Visakhapatnam Region, Andhra Pradesh, India Solomon Raju AJ1, Venkata Ramana K2 1Department of Environmental Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India 2Department of Botany, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India Corresponding author: A.J. Solomon Raju, Department of Environmental Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India Mobile: 91-9866256682, email: [email protected] Article History Received: 28 June 2020 Accepted: 02 August 2020 Published: August 2020 Citation Solomon Raju AJ, Venkata Ramana K. Contribution to the Lepidopterans of Visakhapatnam Region, Andhra Pradesh, India. Species, 2020, 21(68), 275-280 Publication License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. General Note Article is recommended to print as color digital version in recycled paper. ABSTRACT The butterflies Byblia ilithyia (Nymphalidae), Pieris canidia (Pieridae) and Azanus jesous (Lycaenidae) and the day-flying moth, Nyctemera adversata (Erebidae) are oligophagous. Previously, only B. ilithyia has been reported to be occurring in this region while the other three species are being reported for the first time from this region. The larval host plants include Jatropha gossypiifolia and Tragia involucrata for B. ilithyia, Brassica oleracea var. oleracea and B. oleracea var. botrytis for P. canidia, and Acacia auriculiformis for Azanus jesous. The nectar plants include Tragia involucrata, Euphorbia hirta and Jatropha gossypiifolia for B. ilithyia, Premna latifolia and Cleome viscosa for P. canidia, Lagascea mollis, Tridax procumbens and Digera muricata for A. jesous and Bidens pilosa for 275 N. adversata. The study recommends extensive field investigations to find out more larval plants and nectar plants for each Page lepidopteran species now reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier Area, Swellendam
    Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier area, Swellendam by Johannes Philippus Groenewald Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Science in Conservation Ecology in the Faculty of AgriSciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael J. Samways Co-supervisor: Dr. Ruan Veldtman December 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis, for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Ecology, is my own work that have not been previously published in full or in part at any other University. All work that are not my own, are acknowledge in the thesis. ___________________ Date: ____________ Groenewald J.P. Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements Firstly I want to thank my supervisor Prof. M. J. Samways for his guidance and patience through the years and my co-supervisor Dr. R. Veldtman for his help the past few years. This project would not have been possible without the help of Prof. H. Geertsema, who helped me with the identification of the Lepidoptera and other insect caught in the study area. Also want to thank Dr. K. Oberlander for the help with the identification of the Oxalis species found in the study area and Flora Cameron from CREW with the identification of some of the special plants growing in the area. I further express my gratitude to Dr. Odette Curtis from the Overberg Renosterveld Project, who helped with the identification of the rare species found in the study area as well as information about grazing and burning of Renosterveld.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Acraea (Lepidoptera : Nymphalidae) - Peter Hendry
    The genus Acraea (Lepidoptera : Nymphalidae) - Peter Hendry With the recent migration to Australia of the Tawny Coster (Acraea terpsicore (Linnaeus, 1758)), (see Creature Feature this issue), I thought it might be timely to take a look at the genus worldwide. It must be noted that due to a misidentification A. terpsicore had long been known as A. violae and many references in the literature and on the web refer to it as A. violae. As with much of the Lepidoptera the genus is in a state of flux, and has long been split into the subgenera Acraea (Acraea) and Acraea (Actinote). The genus is placed in the tribe Acraeini and until Harvey (1991) placed it in the subfamily Heliconiinae it was listed in the subfamily Acraeinae. Recent molecular work has made changes and a current listing of the tribe Acraeini, by Niklas Wahlberg, is available at http://www.nymphalidae.net/Classification/Acraeini.htm. It shows members of the old subgenus Acraea (Actinote) being placed in the genus Actinote, and the old subgenus Acraea (Acraea) becoming the genus Acraea with a subgenus Acraea (Bematistes). It also lists several Acraea as unplaced. This may further change as some believe the subgenus Acraea (Bematistes) will move to the genus Bematistes. The genus is primarily Afrotropical with only four species occurring outside this region, these being, Acraea andromacha (Fig. 1) A. meyeri (Fig. 10) A. moluccana and A. terpsicore. A fifth species the Yellow Coster Acraea (Actinote) issoria is now referred to the genus Actinote. Like many of the Nymphalidae the larvae feed on plants which contain cyanogens making the larvae and adults poisonous to predators.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Archives Christopher N. Kaiser-Bunbury, Diego P. Vázquez
    1 Ecological Archives 2 3Christopher N. Kaiser-Bunbury, Diego P. Vázquez, Martina Stang, and Jaboury Ghazoul. 2014. 4Determinants of the microstructure of plant-pollinator networks. Ecology. 5 6Appendix A: Detailed supplementary information on the methods, including tables and figures 7 8 A.1 Plant–pollinator networks 9In total, 97 flower visitor taxa were recorded, of which 14 taxa, belonging to the groups of 10spiders, crickets, true bugs (hemiptera) and ants, were excluded from the networks as they were 11not considered pollinators of the inselberg plants. Pollinators were identified to species level for 1228 taxa (34%) and to morpho-species level for the remaining 55 taxa (66%; hereafter all 13pollinator taxa are referred to as ‘pollinator species’). Morpho-species were not pooled based on 14morphological traits such as size, but they were distinguished at the smallest possible level 15without taxonomic determination and assigned a species code. Flower visitors were recorded as 16pollinators when they touched the sexual parts of flowers. Sampling of interactions was 17conducted by the same three observers throughout the 8-month flowering season and sampling 18was standardized between observers fortnightly. We used equal observation periods for all plant 19species to reduce sampling bias and to collect data on interaction frequency independent of size 20constraints and flower abundance (Ollerton and Cranmer 2002). 21 To assess the effect of sampling on network dissimilarities we conducted a rarefaction 22analysis (Hurlbert 1971, Heck et al. 1975). We calculated Bray-Curtis dissimilarities (see Section 23D below for a detailed description on dissimilarity matrices) between rarefied interaction 24matrices sampled at four different proportions (0.8, 0.6, 0.4 and 0.2) and compared the resulting 25mean ± 95% CI dissimilarities of the rarefied matrices to the dissimilarity between the original 26matrices.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)
    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
    [Show full text]