National Media Coverage of the 2017 UK General Election
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Politik Pembangunan Inggris Di Masa Pemerintahan Theresa May Pasca Brexit
POLITIK PEMBANGUNAN INGGRIS DI MASA PEMERINTAHAN THERESA MAY PASCA BREXIT SKRIPSI Disusun untuk Memenuhi Persyaratan Menyelesaikan Pendidikan Sarjana (S-1) pada Program Studi Ilmu Politik Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sumatera Utara Disusun oleh: FATMA RIANTI MALAY 140906065 Dosen pembimbing: Warjio, Ph.D. DEPARTEMEN ILMU POLITIK FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA MEDAN 2018 Universitas Sumatera Utara UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK DEPARTEMEN ILMU POLITIK FATMA RIANTI MALAY POLITIK PEMBANGUNAN INGGRIS PADA MASA THERESA MAY PASCA BREXIT. Rincian isi skripsi, 94 halaman, 1 tabel, 1 grafik, 6 buku, 12 jurnal, 2 artikel, 22 internet. ABSTRAK Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh referendum keluarnya Inggris dari organisasi Supranasional di Eropa, yaitu Uni Eropa yang mengakibatkan gejolak di Inggris hingga perdana menteri david Cameron mengundurkan diri dan digantikan oleh menteri kedua perempuan inggris, Theresa May. Penelitian ini akan membahas Politik pembangunan yang dilakukan Theresa May sebagai actor pembangun pasca keluarnya keanggotaan inggris atas uni eropa. penelitian ini akan membedahnya dengan mnggunakan teori politik pembangunan dalam konteks actor sehingga dapat dilihat tantangan, strategi dan peran. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi interpretatif. Teknik mengumpulan data adalah studi kepustakaan dengan mengumpulkan data-data sekunder yang kemudian dianalisis dengan menggunakan teori politik pembangunan menyangkut sosok tersebut. Hasil dalam penelitian ini adalah peran actor Theresa May sebagai linker atau penghubung aspirasi warga inggris yang melakukan pemungutan suara atau referendum dan menjadi jembatan menuju perubahan-perubahan dan citacita inggris yang lebih baik. Theresa may diharapkan mampu membenahi kehidupan inggris yang lebih baik sebagai Negara yang independen dan memiliki otoritas sendiri dalam segala bidang di dalam negaranya. -
Forward, Together: Our Plan for a Stronger Britain and a Prosperous Future Will Meet the Great Challenges of Our Time, Beyond Brexit
FORWARD, TOGETHER Our Plan for a Stronger Britain and a Prosperous Future THE CONSERVATIVE AND UNIONIST PARTY MANIFESTO 2017 The next five years are the most challenging that Britain has faced in my lifetime. Brexit will define us: our place in the world, our economic security and our future prosperity. So now more than ever, Britain needs a strong and stable government to get the best Brexit deal for our country and its people. Now more than ever, Britain needs strong and stable leadership to make the most of the opportunities Brexit brings for hardworking families. Now more than ever, Britain needs a clear plan. This manifesto, Forward, Together: Our Plan for a Stronger Britain and a Prosperous Future will meet the great challenges of our time, beyond Brexit. With this plan and with a strong hand through Brexit, we will build a stronger, fairer, more prosperous Britain, for all of us. Theresa May Prime Minister 1 THE CONSERVATIVE AND UNIONIST PARTY MANIFESTO 2017 2 CONTENTS Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Five giant challenges ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1. A strong economy that works for everyone ........................................................................ 11 2. A strong and -
Ebook Forums and Hear About Our Consistent Opposition to Austerity and Our Pro-Working Class Platform
Socialist Party | Print Editorial of the Socialist Windrush: Rudd resigns May and Tories must go Build for the 12 May TUC demo Amber Rudd made an "inadvertent" mistake. That was the ludicrous claim made by the outgoing home secretary in her resignation letter. Families have been pulled apart and cancer patients denied treatment. People have lost homes and jobs. They have had their lives turned upside down and thrown into chaos. All the while, the Home Office has sought to turn the screws, with targets for both increasing and fast- tracking deportations. These were targets which Rudd personally ordered and signed off on. Now, exposed as a liar for denying their existence, and faced with mass anger among working class people, she has been forced out. Good riddance. But this by no means draws a line under the issue. The Windrush scandal has exposed the callousness of this Tory government afresh. May has sought to erect a firewall between herself and Rudd, claiming that the hostile environment policy - of which the prime minister was chief advocate and architect - had nothing to do with the home secretary's resignation. Rudd was a key ally to May in the cabinet. Her exit has substantially weakened a prime minister who was already teetering on the edge. It has been widely welcomed, especially by those at the sharp end of the government's racist policies. But responsibility for this scandal, as well as for all the savagery of this austerity government, goes beyond one minister. As Jeremy Corbyn rightly commented, "Amber Rudd has been the human shield for Theresa May, and she's now gone." Corbyn must now draw the obvious conclusion from this and boldly lead the call for the prime minister to resign. -
Last Chance for an Exit from Brexit?
POLICY BRIEF 29 March 2018 Last chance for an exit from Brexit? Fabian Zuleeg "Brexit means Brexit, and we're going to make a success of it." 1 Theresa May, Speech in Birmingham, 11 July 2016 "The only real alternative to a 'hard Brexit' is 'no Brexit'." 2 Donald Tusk, Speech at the Annual Conference of the European Policy Centre, 13 October 2016 "The British people should be given a final say on whatever deal is negotiated. If they are allowed that say, then Brexit can be averted." 3 Tony Blair, Speech to the European Policy Centre, 1 March 2018 "Rather than rescuing the European Union by keeping it intact, an exit from Brexit could splinter the Union from within." 4 Fabian Zuleeg, Exit from Brexit? Not likely but uncertainty prevails, EPC Commentary, 12 July 2016 BACKGROUND – TO BREXIT, OR NOT? The will of the people? The result of the Brexit referendum on 23 June 2016 came as a shock to many, including much of the political establishment in the United Kingdom (UK). With a relatively narrow margin of victory (less than 4%) and Scotland, Northern Ireland, and London clearly voting to Remain, the vote left the country deeply divided. The immediate decision of Prime Minister David Cameron to resign, triggering a leadership contest in the Conservative Party, added to the overall sense of dislocation. In addition, there was a degree of uncertainty about the final outcome. In the UK, a referendum is non-binding and the final decision-making body remains the House of Commons. Since there appeared to be a solid Remain majority in Westminster then, there was speculation that the result of the referendum might not be followed, and that Brexit could be averted. -
ANDREW MARR SHOW 30TH APRIL 2017 THERESA MAY AM: Can We
1 THERESA MAY ANDREW MARR SHOW 30TH APRIL 2017 THERESA MAY AM: Can we agree, to start with, that the one thing that voters deserve in what you yourself have said is going to be a very, very important election, is no sound bites? TM: Well, it is absolutely crucial, because this is I think the most important election that this country has faced in my lifetime. That when people look at this election and when they hear what politicians are saying they think about the national interest. That should be what drives people when they go to vote. AM: But no slogans? We can agree. TM: Andrew, you know that we will all be talking as we go through this election, every party will be talking about what they think is important. I’ll be talking about – AM: Strong and stable leadership – TM: Well, there’s a reason for talking about strong and stable leadership and having a strong and stable government. It’s precisely because this is the most important election the country’s faced in my lifetime. It’s about the future of the country. It’s about the national interest. AM: It’s just that people can listen to that kind of thing and think it’s a bit robotic. TM: No, it’s – when I talk about leadership and when I talk about the strength of the government for the future, I do it for a reason. The reason is this: We are facing a moment of change in this country. We’re facing a moment when we have the opportunity to take this country forward, to make it an even better place to live for people, for their futures, a more secure future for people. -
Postmaster and the Merton Record 2019
Postmaster & The Merton Record 2019 Merton College Oxford OX1 4JD Telephone +44 (0)1865 276310 www.merton.ox.ac.uk Contents College News Edited by Timothy Foot (2011), Claire Spence-Parsons, Dr Duncan From the Acting Warden......................................................................4 Barker and Philippa Logan. JCR News .................................................................................................6 Front cover image MCR News ...............................................................................................8 St Alban’s Quad from the JCR, during the Merton Merton Sport ........................................................................................10 Society Garden Party 2019. Photograph by John Cairns. Hockey, Rugby, Tennis, Men’s Rowing, Women’s Rowing, Athletics, Cricket, Sports Overview, Blues & Haigh Awards Additional images (unless credited) 4: Ian Wallman Clubs & Societies ................................................................................22 8, 33: Valerian Chen (2016) Halsbury Society, History Society, Roger Bacon Society, 10, 13, 36, 37, 40, 86, 95, 116: John Cairns (www. Neave Society, Christian Union, Bodley Club, Mathematics Society, johncairns.co.uk) Tinbergen Society 12: Callum Schafer (Mansfield, 2017) 14, 15: Maria Salaru (St Antony’s, 2011) Interdisciplinary Groups ....................................................................32 16, 22, 23, 24, 80: Joseph Rhee (2018) Ockham Lectures, History of the Book Group 28, 32, 99, 103, 104, 108, 109: Timothy Foot -
Trump Undercuts Leader of Britain After Nato Clash
C M Y K Nxxx,2018-07-13,A,001,Bs-4C,E2 Late Edition Today, sunny to partly cloudy, low humidity, high 83. Tonight, partly cloudy, low 70. Tomorrow, periodic clouds and sunshine, warm, high 86. Weather map appears on Page B16. VOL. CLXVII ... No. 58,022 © 2018 The New York Times Company NEW YORK, FRIDAY, JULY 13, 2018 $3.00 TRUMP UNDERCUTS LEADER OF BRITAIN AFTER NATO CLASH In Her Country, the President Criticizes the Prime Minister’s Brexit Plan By STEPHEN CASTLE and JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS LONDON — President Trump would be a great prime minister. I put his brand of confrontational think he’s got what it takes and I and disruptive diplomacy on full think he’s got the right attitude to display Thursday, unsettling be a great prime minister.” NATO allies with a blustering per- Coming after his combative formance in Brussels and then, in performance in Brussels with a remarkable breach of protocol, leaders of the 28 other NATO na- publicly undercutting Prime Min- tions, the day amounted to a ister Theresa May of Britain in an global disruption tour unlike any- interview published hours after thing undertaken by any other re- landing in her country. cent American president. In the interview with The Sun, In Brussels on Thursday, Mr. Mr. Trump second-guessed Mrs. Trump said he supported NATO May’s handling of the main issue but seemed to suggest that the on her plate: how Britain should United States could leave if the al- cut ties to the European Union. He lies didn’t increase defense spend- cast doubt on whether he was will- ing. -
Revue Française De Civilisation Britannique, XXV-3 | 2020 As Easy As Bojo’S ‘Oven-Ready’ Brexit Pie? the Conservative Campaign 2
Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XXV-3 | 2020 "Get Brexit Done!" The 2019 General Elections in the UK As Easy as Bojo’s ‘Oven-ready’ Brexit Pie? The Conservative Campaign Aussi facile que la tarte au Brexit ‘prête à cuire’ de Bojo? La campagne des Conservateurs Alma-Pierre Bonnet Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/5718 DOI: 10.4000/rfcb.5718 ISSN: 2429-4373 Publisher CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d'études en civilisation britannique Electronic reference Alma-Pierre Bonnet, « As Easy as Bojo’s ‘Oven-ready’ Brexit Pie? The Conservative Campaign », Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique [Online], XXV-3 | 2020, Online since 10 September 2020, connection on 10 September 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/5718 ; DOI : https://doi.org/ 10.4000/rfcb.5718 This text was automatically generated on 10 September 2020. Revue française de civilisation britannique est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. As Easy as Bojo’s ‘Oven-ready’ Brexit Pie? The Conservative Campaign 1 As Easy as Bojo’s ‘Oven-ready’ Brexit Pie? The Conservative Campaign Aussi facile que la tarte au Brexit ‘prête à cuire’ de Bojo? La campagne des Conservateurs Alma-Pierre Bonnet Introduction 1 The 2019 general election took place in a divided country in which tension and distrust in politicians had been exacerbated by months, even years, of Brexit uncertainty. Clarity was desperately needed as the political class had failed to deliver any solution to the Brexit problem. -
The Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University
The Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University NSF #0937591 September 15, 2010 – September 14, 2011 PI: David H. Guston, Arizona State University Co-PIs: Elizabeth Corley, Arizona State University Deirdre Meldrum, Arizona State University Clark Miller, Arizona State University Dietram Scheufele, University of Wisconsin, Madison Jan Youtie, Georgia Institute of Technology Annual Report for the Period September 15, 2010 to September 14, 2011 This report includes work conducted at three collaborating universities of NSEC/CNS-ASU: Arizona State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Annual Report for Award #0937591 October 1, 2010 – September 30, 2011 2. Table of Contents Project Summary 3 List of Center Participants, Advisory Boards, and Participating Institutions 4 Quantifiable Outputs – Table 1 27 Mission and Broader Impacts 29 Highlights 42 Strategic Research Plan 47 Research Program, Accomplishments, and Plans 50 a. RTTA 1 50 b. RTTA 2 55 c. RTTA 3 60 d. RTTA 4 71 e. TRC 1 78 f. TRC 2 82 NSEC Center Diversity – Progress and Plans 90 Education 95 Outreach and Knowledge Transfer 107 Shared and Other Experimental Facilities 123 Personnel 127 Publications and Patents 132 Biographical Information 211 Honors and Awards 219 Fiscal Sections (REMOVED) 220 Cost Sharing (REMOVED) 243 Leverage 258 1 Annual Report for Award #0937591 October 1, 2010 – September 30, 2011 Current and Pending Support 262 Tables Table 1 27 Table 2 (REMOVED 88 Table 3A 106 Table 3B 106 Table 4A 131 Table 4B 131 Table 5 (REMOVED) 258 Table 6 259 2 Annual Report for Award #0937591 October 1, 2010 – September 30, 2011 3. -
Theresa May's Leadership Capital July 2016 to July 2018
'Dominance, defence and diminishing returns'? Theresa May’s Leadership Capital July 2016 to July 2018 Ben Worthy Department of Politics Birkbeck College University of London [email protected] Mark Bennister School of Social and Political Sciences University of Lincoln [email protected] Abstract: Theresa May’s first two years in office illustrate Anthony King’s (1991) observation that premierships can vary within themselves. Her premiership divides into two distinct phases, before and after the snap general election of June 2017, with a final coda after July 2017 when her premiership unravelled. Whilst the disastrous election looked like the crucial event, analysis using the Leadership Capital Index (LCI) suggests that, contrary to popular assumptions, before the election May was weaker than she appeared and afterwards not quite as diminished as assumed. The LCI analysis we present here (focusing on the year before and the year after the 2017 general election) shows that May’s capital fell, but not as far as presented by prevailing narratives. May went from being, in LCI terms, an ‘exceptional leader’ to a ‘medium capital leader’ facing obstacles, but still capable of action. May’s resilience after 2017 was a result of Brexit, the poor polling of her opponents and her unexpected poll strength, bolstered by the weakness of her internal challengers. Even a poorly positioned prime minister has considerable resources to call upon. Keywords: Theresa May, prime minister, leadership capital, authority, Brexit 1 Introduction This article analysis Theresa May’s changing leadership capital during the first two years of her premiership from her arrival in power until the final publication of her ‘Chequers Agreement, her proposed solution to Brexit that led to her removal and stepping down a year later. -
Gender Discourse on Politicians in News Writing: a Corpus Study
Gender Discourse on Politicians in News Writing: A Corpus Study Anna Vahtera MA Thesis English, Language Specialist Path School of Languages and Translation Studies Faculty of Humanities University of Turku November 2018 The originality of this thesis has been checked in accordance with the University of Turku quality assurance system using the Turnitin OriginalityCheck service. UNIVERSITY OF TURKU School of Languages and Translation Studies / Faculty of Humanities VAHTERA, ANNA: Gender Discourse on Politicians in News Writing: A Corpus Study MA Thesis, 73 p., appendices 14 p. English, Language Specialist Path November 2018 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This study examines gender discourse in newspapers’ coverage on male and female politicians. Newspapers have an important role in creating and maintaining gender discourses, perceptions on gender and gender stereotypes, since they are considered a trustworthy source of information by large audiences even in the current time, where the traditional media are experiencing a decline in their popularity. Therefore, it is important to examine critically the word choices newspapers make when they report on leading political figures, since these choices can hide gender bias and affect the readers’ perceptions. This study uses Corpus-driven Discourse Analysis in order to examine newspapers’ word choices. The theoretical background comes from Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), especially from Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis (FCDA) and Feminist Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis (FPDA). These theories combined with Corpus Linguistics enable the critical examination of the selected data. In addition, the thesis will also have a short verb transitivity analysis using Systemic Functional Linguistics. For the study, four politicians were selected as study subjects, two of which were female and two male politicians. -
The Conservatives
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sussex Research Online Britain Votes (2017) 46–58 TIM BALE AND PAUL WEBB* ‘We Didn’t See it Coming’:1 The Conservatives Theresa May’s decision to call an early election was clearly a foolish one—but only in hindsight. After all, opinion polls had been showing the Conservatives way ahead of Labour for months and they had not long before chalked up the firstby-electiongainfromtheopposition by a governing party for thirty-five years. Moreover, on almost every leadership measure one cared to mention, Mrs May was beating Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn hands down. And if anyone had counselled her to wait for the results of local election results before deciding, they could easily have been accused of looking unduly cautious: in the event, in England and Wales the Conservatives gained nearly 400 seats, Labour lost nearly 250 and UKIP over 140, while the much-anticipated Liberal Democrat revival came to nothing; north of the border, Labour and the SNP both lost support, allowing the Conservatives to claim second place. Hardly surprising, then, that all the talk was not of whether May would win but by how many seats, and what would that mean both for Brexit and the future of the Labour Party. 1. A personalised campaign with no personality But behind the scenes at Conservative Central Office (CCHQ), apparently, not everything was tickety-boo. Well-sourced accounts (albeit conflicting ones) of the Conservative campaign suggest that it was, in fact, plagued with problems from the start (Shipman, 2017, McTague et al.,2017).