NRLP Province 1 Pager W:Map

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

May 2012 NECHAKO RIVER LEGACY PROJECT K e n n e y d a m w a t e r relase facility The Kenney Dam Canyon and resulted in the Sixty years of reservoir The Cheslatta fresh-water was constructed on the Nechako flooding of 120,000 acres of releases have desecrated the fisheries court case is being held River in 1952 to service the the Upper-Nechako Watershed fresh-water fisheries in the in abeyance until the Kenney Alcan aluminum smelter in and the removal of Murray-Cheslatta system. Dam Release Facility (KDRF) Kitimat. The Kenney Dam approximately 2/3 of the is built. blocked all flows in the Nechako natural flow of the Nechako. 2007 Cemetery Flooding THE SOLUTION A Kenney Dam Water Release Facility (KDRF) would stop the flooding of Cheslatta graves, stimulate a massive environmental restoration of the Upper Nechako watershed, and begin a revitalization process for the Cheslatta land and people. The provincial government has committed on numerous occasions to build the KDRF. In 2012, the Nechako Watershed Council and the First Nations Summit unanimously supported its construction. In order to make the KDRF economically feasible, the Cheslatta have secured an industry partner to build a hydro-electric powerhouse as a key component of the KDRF. Legacy Fund 1992 Cemetery Flooding The Cheslatta are committed to establishing a substantial Nechako Environmental Enhancement Fund once the KDRF is operational. Next Steps/Requests: The Cheslatta-Carrier Nation is a First Nations community whose Cheslatta request that the Province members currently reside south of Burns Lake, BC. Much of their direct the Nechako Environmental traditional territory was flooded Kenney Dam by the Kenney Dam in 1952. Enhancement Fund to uphold its 2001 recommendation to construct the Cheslatta cemeteries and gravesites are continually KDRF. flooded by huge releases from Cheslatta also request that the the Skins Lake Spillway – Province direct BC Hydro to negotiate human remains (male and an Energy Purchase Agreement with female) were found on the Cheslatta and its industry partner to shore of Cheslatta Lake in ensure that the KDRF can be built. 2012. cheslatta carrier nation 250-694-3334 [email protected] May 2012 NECHAKO RIVER LEGACY PROJECT cheslatta carrier nation 250-694-3334 [email protected].

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Timeline: Cheslatta Carrier Nation and “Southside” Community 5000BC
Timeline: Cheslatta Carrier Nation and “Southside” Community (Updated to March 3 2021 by Mike Robertson) Please contact me for additions and/or corrections [email protected] 5000BC Archaeological evidence confirms 7000 years of human occupation in the Cheslatta Territory 1763 British Royal Proclamation reserved undefined North American land for Aboriginal people. 1770 est “Grandmother Cheslatta” born 1774 Juan Perez Hernandez claimed the Northwestern coast of North America for Spain. 1791 Spanish explorer Esteban Jose Martinez traded copper sheets to Nootka Sound Chief Maquinna for sawn timber. 1793 Alexander Mackenzie became the first white man to travel through Carrier and Sekani territories while looking for fur-trading areas for the North West Company. 1805-1807 - Simon Fraser established four trading posts in Carrier and Sekani territories: Fort McLeod, Fort George, Fort St. James and Fort Fraser. Until the Hudson Bay Company and North West Company joined together in 1821, Fort St. James was the centre of government and commerce in British Columbia (then called New Caledonia). It claims to be the oldest established white settlement on the B.C. Mainland 1807 February 10th Simon Fraser wrote a letter to express what he witnessed in Stella (Stellaquo). “Almost all Natlians are gone over to Steela.. to grand feast to burn and exhume a couple of chiefs that died of late. When they return from there they will go to the mountains to kill Caribou.” 1828 Chief Kwah captured James Douglas at Ft. St. James, whom he held until his release was negotiated. The incident lead to conflict among different Carrier Nations. Douglas went on to become the first governor of the united colony of British Columbia.
[Show full text]
News Release
NEWS RELEASE For Immediate Release Ministry of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation 2019IRR0036-000704 Cheslatta Carrier Nation April 17, 2019 Cheslatta Carrier Nation, Province sign agreements to address historic wrong VICTORIA ʹMore than 65 years after their lands were flooded to make way for the creation of the Nechako Reservoir, the Cheslatta Carrier Nation have signed agreements with the Province of British Columbia that provide restitution and redress for impacts suffered by their community and their peoples. In 1952, the Cheslatta Nation peoples were evicted from their homes on two weeks͛notice and forcibly resettled outside their traditional lands. Their lands, villages, cultural and spiritual sites were then flooded as the newly built Kenney Dam filled what is now known as the Nechako Reservoir. At a private ceremony in Victoria, Chief Corrina Leween and Councillors Ted Jack and Hazel Burt of Cheslatta Nation, along with Scott Fraser, Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation, signed a Settlement Agreement and an Interim Reconciliation Agreement. Together, these agreements will provide the Cheslatta Nation with funding and lands to create a base for future community, social and economic development. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, Cheslatta will propose certain lands for transfer and tenures. A period of extensive engagement with neighbouring First Nations and stakeholders will proceed before final land parcels can be determined. Community support for a final settlement has been strong, with unanimous endorsement of the Settlement Agreement from Cheslatta voters in a ratification process concluded on March 14, 2019. Cheslatta Nation has requested that terms of the agreement remain confidential for one year pending their negotiations with other parties.
[Show full text]
Language List 2019
First Nations Languages in British Columbia – Revised June 2019 Family1 Language Name2 Other Names3 Dialects4 #5 Communities Where Spoken6 Anishnaabemowin Saulteau 7 1 Saulteau First Nations ALGONQUIAN 1. Anishinaabemowin Ojibway ~ Ojibwe Saulteau Plains Ojibway Blueberry River First Nations Fort Nelson First Nation 2. Nēhiyawēwin ᓀᐦᐃᔭᐍᐏᐣ Saulteau First Nations ALGONQUIAN Cree Nēhiyawēwin (Plains Cree) 1 West Moberly First Nations Plains Cree Many urban areas, especially Vancouver Cheslatta Carrier Nation Nak’albun-Dzinghubun/ Lheidli-T’enneh First Nation Stuart-Trembleur Lake Lhoosk’uz Dene Nation Lhtako Dene Nation (Tl’azt’en, Yekooche, Nadleh Whut’en First Nation Nak’azdli) Nak’azdli Whut’en ATHABASKAN- ᑕᗸᒡ NaZko First Nation Saik’uz First Nation Carrier 12 EYAK-TLINGIT or 3. Dakelh Fraser-Nechakoh Stellat’en First Nation 8 Taculli ~ Takulie NA-DENE (Cheslatta, Sdelakoh, Nadleh, Takla Lake First Nation Saik’uZ, Lheidli) Tl’azt’en Nation Ts’il KaZ Koh First Nation Ulkatcho First Nation Blackwater (Lhk’acho, Yekooche First Nation Lhoosk’uz, Ndazko, Lhtakoh) Urban areas, especially Prince George and Quesnel 1 Please see the appendix for definitions of family, language and dialect. 2 The “Language Names” are those used on First Peoples' Language Map of British Columbia (http://fp-maps.ca) and were compiled in consultation with First Nations communities. 3 The “Other Names” are names by which the language is known, today or in the past. Some of these names may no longer be in use and may not be considered acceptable by communities but it is useful to include them in order to assist with the location of language resources which may have used these alternate names.
[Show full text]
Understanding Our Lives Middle Years Development Instrumentfor 2019–2020 Survey of Grade 7 Students
ONLY USE UNDERSTANDING OUR LIVES MIDDLE YEARS DEVELOPMENT INSTRUMENTFOR 2019–2020 SURVEY OF GRADE 7 STUDENTS BRITISH COLUMBIA You can preview the survey online at INSTRUCTIONALSAMPLE SURVEY www.mdi.ubc.ca. NOT © Copyright of UBC and contributors. Copying, distributing, modifying or translating this work is expressly forbidden by the copyright holders. Contact Human Early Learning Partnership at [email protected] to obtain copyright permissions. Version: Sep 13, 2019 H18-00507 IMPORTANT REMINDERS! 1. Prior to starting the survey, please read the Student Assent on the next page aloud to your students! Students must be given the opportunity to decline and not complete the survey. Students can withdraw anytime by clicking the button at the bottom of every page. 2. Each student has their own login ID and password assigned to them. Students need to know that their answers are confidential, so that they will feel more comfortable answering the questions honestly. It is critical that they know this is not a test, and that there are no right or wrong answers. 3. The “Tell us About Yourself” section at the beginning of the survey can be challenging for some students. Please read this section aloud to make sure everybody understands. You know your students best and if you are concerned about their reading level, we suggest you read all of the survey questions aloud to your students. 4. The MDI takes about one to two classroom periods to complete.ONLY The “Activities” section is a natural place to break. USE Thank you! What’s new on the MDI? 1. We have updated questions 5-7 on First Nations, Métis and Inuit identity, and First Nations languages learned and spoken at home.
[Show full text]
Lheidli T'enneh Perspectives on Resource Development
THE PARADOX OF DEVELOPMENT: LHEIDLI T'ENNEH PERSPECTIVES ON RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT by Geoffrey E.D. Hughes B.A., Northern Studies, University of Northern British Columbia, 2002 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN FIRST NATIONS STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA November 2011 © Geoffrey Hughes, 2011 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du 1+1 Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87547-6 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87547-6 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
[Show full text]
Managing Relational Legacies: Lessons from British Columbia, Canada
Adm. Sci. 2014, 4, 15–34; doi:10.3390/admsci4010015 OPEN ACCESS administrative sciences ISSN 2076-3387 www.mdpi.com/journal/admsci Article Managing Relational Legacies: Lessons from British Columbia, Canada Sofiane Baba 1 and Emmanuel Raufflet 2,* 1 HEC Montréal, 15-2849 Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC H3T 1J6, Canada; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 HEC Montréal, 3000 Ch. de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, office 5.220, Montréal, QC H3T 2A7, Canada * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-514-340-6196; Fax: +1-514-340-5635. Received: 30 September 2013; in revised form: 23 December 2013 / Accepted: 31 December 2013 / Published: 8 January 2014 Abstract: Issues related to company-community relations and the social license to operate have emerged as strategic business issues. This paper aims to contribute to the growing body of research on long-term company-community relations. An analysis of the relationship between Alcan (Aluminum of Canada, Montréal, Canada part of Rio Tinto since 2007) with the Cheslatta Carrier First Nation in the Kemano-Kitimat area of northern British Columbia, Canada, provides three contributions. The first is related to the notion of relational legacy, which refers to the sedimentation of unresolved issues that have the potential to impede the realization of corporate activities and the reproduction of low levels of social license to operate. The second concerns stakeholder management. While the literature suggests that stakeholders should be managed by companies according to the degree of salience, this analysis suggests that researchers and managers should consider the evolution of the environmental context in their analyses.
[Show full text]
Prince George: Socio-Historical, Geographical, Political, and Economic Context Profile1
Prince George: Socio-historical, geographical, political, and economic context profile1 Prince George at night (Prince George Métis Community Association, 2014) Prepared by EQUIP Research staff on behalf of Central Interior Native Health Society Please Feel Free to Distribute Widely Colleen M. Varcoe, RN, PhD, and Annette J. Browne, RN, PhD Co-Principal Investigators Rochelle Einboden, MSN Research Assistant Acknowledgments: Thank you to Sarah de Leeuw, Carlene Dingwall, and Murry Krause for their input and review, to Kelsey Timler for her editorial and research support, and to Georgina Martin for her contributions to background materials. 1 Please cite this monograph as: Varcoe, C. M., Browne, A. J., & Einboden, R. (2015). Prince George: Socio- historical, geographical, political and economic context profile. EQUIP Healthcare: Research to equip primary healthcare for equity, in partnership with Central Interior Native Health Society. University of British Columbia, Vancouver & Prince George, BC. Version: February 19, 2015 This research program was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca). Table of Contents Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 3 The Lheidli T’enneh Nation........................................................................................................ 4 The impacts of colonialism ........................................................................................................
[Show full text]
REPORT on the Status of Bc First Nations Languages
report on the status of B.C. First Nations Languages Third Edition, 2018 Nłeʔkepmxcín Sgüüx̣s Danezāgé’ Éy7á7juuthem diitiidʔaatx̣ Gitsenimx̱ St̓át̓imcets Dane-Zaa (ᑕᓀ ᖚ) Hul’q’umi’num’ / Halq’eméylem / hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ Háiɫzaqvḷa Nisg̱a’a Sk̲wx̱wú7mesh sníchim Nsyilxcən Dakelh (ᑕᗸᒡ) Kwak̓wala Dene K’e Anishnaubemowin SENĆOŦEN / Malchosen / Lekwungen / Semiahmoo/ T’Sou-ke Witsuwit'en / Nedut'en X̄enaksialak̓ala / X̄a’islak̓ala Tāłtān X̱aad Kil / X̱aaydaa Kil Tsilhqot'in Oowekyala / ’Uik̓ala She shashishalhem Southern Tutchone Sm̓algya̱x Ktunaxa Secwepemctsín Łingít Nuučaan̓uɫ ᓀᐦᐃᔭᐍᐏᐣ (Nēhiyawēwin) Nuxalk Tse’khene Authors The First Peoples’ Cultural Council serves: Britt Dunlop, Suzanne Gessner, Tracey Herbert • 203 B.C. First Nations & Aliana Parker • 34 languages and more than 90 dialects • First Nations arts and culture organizations Design: Backyard Creative • Indigenous artists • Indigenous education organizations Copyediting: Lauri Seidlitz Cover Art The First Peoples’ Cultural Council has received funding Janine Lott, Title: Okanagan Summer Bounty from the following sources: A celebration of our history, traditions, lands, lake, mountains, sunny skies and all life forms sustained within. Pictographic designs are nestled over a map of our traditional territory. Janine Lott is a syilx Okanagan Elder residing in her home community of Westbank, B.C. She works mainly with hardshell gourds grown in her garden located in the Okanagan Valley. Janine carves, pyro-engraves, paints, sculpts and shapes gourds into artistic creations. She also does multi-media and acrylic artwork on canvas and Aboriginal Neighbours, Anglican Diocese of British wood including block printing. Her work can be found at Columbia, B.C. Arts Council, Canada Council for the Arts, janinelottstudio.com and on Facebook. Department of Canadian Heritage, First Nations Health Authority, First Peoples’ Cultural Foundation, Margaret A.
[Show full text]
First Nations Cancer Survivorship Care Plan
First Nations Cancer Survivorship Care Plan First Nations Cancer Survivorship Care Plan This plan is prepared for: [Patient name] on: [Today’s date] by: [Name of overseeing HCP] [Contact information] Acknowledgments: This care plan was created for First Nation cancer survivors living in rural and remote communities in northern British Columbia. The purpose of this care plan is to provide information to survivors and improve communication between health care professionals and patients. This care plan does not substitute health care services or advice provided by professionals. Thank you to the survivors, health care professionals and expert key informants whose insight and knowledge made the development and validation of this care plan possible. Your expertise has helped to address unmet needs in your communities and the stories you have shared have been very empowering. Production of this care plan has been made possible through funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada. We would like to thank the following community research assistants for their contribution to this project. Terri Stewart Karon McKay Bill Blackwater Stacey Pierre Margo French Editors Rob Olson, MD, FRCPC, MSc Pam Tobin, MA Care Plan Development Team Kristin Turnbull, BHSc Dana Munroe, BSc Chelan Zirul, MA Rehana Manji, BSc Amanda Ward, PhD Expert Key Informants Frankie Goodwin, RN, BN; Gina McKenzie, MSW; Howard Lim, MD, PhD, FRCPC; Janine Giese-Davis, PhD; Jeff Sisler, MD, MCISc, FCFP; Jill Taylor-Brown, MSW, RSW; Kerry Courneya, PhD; Lois Smith, BSW, RSW, MEd; Lorna Weir, MD, FRCPC; Lorraine Thibeault, MA; Maureen Parkinson, CCRC, MEd; Robb Watt, BSc (Pharm); Scott Tyldesley, MD, FRCPC.
[Show full text]
Undrip Implementation: of International, More Reflections on the Braiding Laws and Indigenous Domestic
UNDRIP IMPLEMENTATION: MORE REFLECTIONS ON THE BRAIDING OF INTERNATIONAL, DOMESTIC AND INDIGENOUS MORE REFLECTIONS ON THE BRAIDINGLAWS OF INTERNATIONAL, UNDRIP IMPLEMENTATION: UNDRIP Implementation More Reflections on the Braiding of International, Domestic and Indigenous Laws SPECIAL REPORT 67 Erb Street West Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 6C2 www.cigionline.org UNDRIP Implementation More Reflections on the Braiding of International, Domestic and Indigenous Laws SPECIAL REPORT CIGI Masthead Executive President Rohinton P. Medhora Deputy Director, International Intellectual Property Law and Innovation Bassem Awad Chief Financial Officer and Director of Operations Shelley Boettger Director of the Global Economy Program Robert Fay Director of the International Law Research Program Oonagh Fitzgerald Director of the Global Security & Politics Program Fen Osler Hampson Director of Human Resources Laura Kacur Deputy Director, International Environmental Law Silvia Maciunas Deputy Director, International Economic Law Hugo Perezcano Díaz Director, Evaluation and Partnerships Erica Shaw Managing Director and General Counsel Aaron Shull Director of Communications and Digital Media Spencer Tripp Publications Publisher Carol Bonnett Senior Publications Editor Jennifer Goyder Publications Editor Susan Bubak Publications Editor Patricia Holmes Publications Editor Nicole Langlois Publications Editor Lynn Schellenberg Graphic Designer Melodie Wakefield For publications enquiries, please contact [email protected]. Communications For media enquiries, please contact [email protected]. @cigionline Copyright © 2018 by the Centre for International Governance Innovation The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Centre for International Governance Innovation or its Board of Directors. Cover image: Healing, Jim Logan This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution — Non-commercial — No Derivatives License.
[Show full text]
Cheslatta Carrier Nation Interim Reconciliation Agreement
INTERIM RECONCILIATION AGREEMENT Cheslatta Carrier Nation and British Columbia TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 INTERPRETATION .. .. ... ................. ............................................................ 2 PART2 PURPOSE ......................................... ... ...................................................... 4 PART3 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES ... ............................ ... ............ .4 PART4 SOCIAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE ..... .... .. .... ..................... .......... ......... 5 PARTS FISH AND WILDLIFE AND PROTECTED AREAS ... .................................. 5 PART6 WATERSHED AND HERITAGE RESTORATION ... ........ ........................... 5 PART? FORESTRY ................... .............. ............................................ .. .. ............... 6 PART8 FURTHER RECONCILIATION ......... .... ...................................................... 7 PART9 CONDITIONS PRECEDENT ........................................ ... ........ ....... .. .......... 7 PART10 DISPUTE RESOLUTION ...................... ... ........ ..... ...................................... 8 PART 11 TERM AND EFFECTIVE DATE .............. .. ........................... ....................... 8 PART12 FORCE MAJEURE .. ........ .. ........................................ ................................. 8 PART13 GENERAL PROVISIONS ..................................... ................... ................... 9 SCHEDULE 1 MAP OF CHESLATTA TERRITORY .. ................... .... ....................... 14 SCHEDULE 2 COLLABORATION ON
[Show full text]
Pro Or Con? Measuring First Nations' Support Or Opposition to Oil and Gas
CEC Fact Sheet #12 | July 2020 Pro or Con? Measuring First Nations’ support or opposition to oil and gas in BC and Alberta Quantifying actual First Nations’ positions on oil and • ‘Yes’ indicates clear support in general for an oil or gas gas development development or pipelines, or for a specific project. Oil and natural gas are a substantial part of Canada’s resource • ‘No’ indicates clear opposition in general for an oil or gas economy, especially in Western Canada where, historically, development or pipelines, or to a specific project, and the majority of activity has occurred. This extraction is also absent any conflicting signals, i.e., support for some other mostly a rural activity. That reality is matched by another project. one: The rural location of many First Nations reserves. This geographic “match up” of rural First Nations and Canada’s • ‘Non-object/unclear’ indicates First Nations who in terms resource economy is not often recognized in urban Canada, known in the industry either formally do not object to a where the narrative from anti-oil and gas activists and media project and/or have withdrawn a previous objection. This stories on occasion portrays First Nations in British Columbia is not as strong as ‘Yes’ but it is also not a ‘No’ given some and Alberta as broadly anti-oil and gas development. First Nations have withdrawn previous objections to a project, i.e., withdrawing opposition to the Trans Mountain In fact, many First Nations are involved in and benefit from pipeline. oil and gas development. Two prominent examples are Fort • The “N/A” categorization is for First Nations who have not McKay in Alberta, which has a long history with the oil sands been formerly consulted on current oil or gas projects or industry, and the Haisla First Nation in British Columbia, which who do not extract oil and gas.
[Show full text]