DOCSLIB.ORG

EASA NPA 2016-12 EFB EFB Admin Remarks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EASA NPA 2016-12 EFB EFB Admin Remarks EASA NPA 2016-12 EFB 1/3 EFB Admin Remarks From: Hans-Conrad Stamm (SWISS / OFI) in coordination with Lufthansa EFB Hamonisation Group representing EFB Administrators from AUA Austian Airlines, Brussels Airline, Eurowings/Germanwings, Lufthansa Passage, Lufthansa Cityline, Lufthansa Cargo, SWISS) Date: Dez 2016 Feedback from LH EFB Hamonisation Group & SWISS regarding proposed “EASA NPA 2016-12 Transposition of provisions on electronic flight bags from ICAO Annex 6” (RMT.0601 — 4.10.2016) Executive Summary of the NPA 2016-12 EFB The NPA is published to maintain a high level of safety with regard to the use of EFBs by ensuring a harmonised implementation of the current provisions of AMC 20-25. It includes a proposal for an operational approval for the use of EFB applications by commercial air transport (CAT) operators. General Remarks LX The proposed NPA 2016-12 has the goal to harmonize the implementation of the AMC 20-25 and to give EFB system providers, application developers, operators and regulators guidance how to implement an EFB solution. The 138 page NPA is very detailed and covers all relevant areas. It supports the basic principle that an EFB system should support the pilots and should support a safe operation. Nevertheless in some parts the guidance is very specific, restrictive and complex. This could lead to: - It will increase complexity, manpower needed and time to implement an EFB solution for system suppliers, operators and regulators. - It is questionable if a regulation this complex and specific can cope in all cases with technology innovations especially in the IT- and EFB-Area. It is more likely that it could hinder new, smart, convenient or innovative solutions in future. As a general feedback the document should be reduced to be less complex, less specific and less detailed. Especially regarding IT- Issues it should not focus on « how things are done » (because this can change fast) but on what is « the aim to reach ». Specific Remarks: AMC1.CAT.GEN.MPA.141(a) (h) Viewable stowage (pg21) What does this mean? If the pilot cannot access the EFB controls, how shall a shutdown be possible? OFI - eOperations Hans-Cornad Stamm / CMD A32x / Manager eOperations Swiss International Air Lines Ltd. Swiss Global Air Lines Ltd. www.swiss.com EASA NPA 2016-12 EFB 2/3 EFB Admin Remarks AMC3.CAT.GEN.MPA.141(b) TYPICAL TPYE B APPLICATIONS (pg25) (b)..., but without a display of aircraft/own-ship position, except in the specific case of day VFR operations only. Lufthansa Group including SWISS rates the benefits of OSP on digital maps higher than the acompanied risks. Until Nov 2016 Lufthansa Group has operated ~2,5 Mio flights with OSP on EFB charts, and there are no negative reports about this feature. In contrary safety department has come to the conclusion that OSP could have avoided previous incidents where no OSP was available. LHP and SWISS B777 OSP on EFB incorporates these features: - Position of certified aircraft system sources (FMS, GPS) for OSP on charts. - OSP is only to be used for orientation on the map, symbol is a circle - crew procedure and training how to use OSP by crews Lufthansa Group including SWISS propses that OSP is allwoed on EFB, maybe under the some to be defined requirements. AMC1.SPA.EFB.100 (b) (pg 32) AMC1.NCC.GEN.131 (b) (pg 61) AMC1.SPO.GEN.131 (b) (pg 80) What is a “qualified/verified input data”, "appropriate industry standards"? What is the aim of this paragraph? OFI - eOperations Hans-Cornad Stamm / CMD A32x / Manager eOperations Swiss International Air Lines Ltd. Swiss Global Air Lines Ltd. www.swiss.com EASA NPA 2016-12 EFB 3/3 EFB Admin Remarks AMC1.SPA.EFB.100 (b) (pg 37) Term “partitioned” is to specific and outdated, it does not include other possible means of IT Security measurements like iOS sandbox principle or virtual machines. Proposal to: o DELETE “and partinioned” o CHANGE the (e.g. to “e.g. separated partitions, virtual machines, sandbox, etc)“ AMC6.SPA.EFB.100 (b) (pg 49) Why is this special to AMMD? Transfer medium could also be an online data-transmission e.g. update over wifi or download from an app-store. Or the app or the entire service could be in the cloud. What is the aim of this statement? AMC8.SPA.EFB.100 (b) (pg 52) ...prevail if there is a difference from IFW... IFW will in nature always be different from the classic wx information. The qualification of weather sources as reliable should be evaluated by the operator. (end of document) OFI - eOperations Hans-Cornad Stamm / CMD A32x / Manager eOperations Swiss International Air Lines Ltd. Swiss Global Air Lines Ltd. www.swiss.com .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalization, Hysteresis, and Labor Relations in Western European Commercial Aviation
    MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/16 Liberalization, Hysteresis, and Labor Relations in Western European Commercial Aviation Filippo Reale MPIfG Discussion Paper MPIfG Discussion Paper Filippo Reale Liberalization, Hysteresis, and Labor Relations in Western European Commercial Aviation MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/16 Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Köln Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne September 2017 MPIfG Discussion Paper ISSN 0944-2073 (Print) ISSN 1864-4325 (Internet) © 2017 by the author(s) About the author Filippo Reale is a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Sociology at Goethe University Frankfurt. He was a doctoral researcher at the International Max Planck Research School on the Social and Political Constitution of the Economy (IMPRS-SPCE), Cologne, from 2012 to 2016. Email: [email protected] MPIfG Discussion Papers are refereed scholarly papers of the kind that are publishable in a peer-reviewed disciplinary journal. Their objective is to contribute to the cumulative improvement of theoretical knowl- edge. The papers can be ordered from the institute for a small fee (hard copies) or downloaded free of charge (PDF). Downloads www.mpifg.de Go to Publications / Discussion Papers Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies Paulstr. 3 | 50676 Cologne | Germany Tel. +49 221 2767-0 Fax +49 221 2767-555 www.mpifg.de [email protected] Reale: Liberalization, Hysteresis, and Labor Relations iii Abstract Airlines have reacted in many ways to the liberalization and privatization of commercial aviation in Western Europe, one of them being outsourcing. The labor unions, for their part, have reacted in unexpected ways to these developments, not cooperating as anticipated by various political theories and, conversely, collaborating surprisingly under other conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Best Practices for Commercial Operators
    OPERATIONS IN AIRSPACE CLASS E IN GERMANY BELOW FL100 RECOMMENDED BEST PRACTICES FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATORS The following best practices have been developed by flight safety officers and experts to enhance the safety of operations in airspace Class E below FL100 to prevent collisions between controlled and uncontrolled aircraft in a mixed traffic environment. Recommendations for training departments and pilots • IMPROVE AIRSPACE AWARENESS Train pilots to be aware of shortfalls in the existing airspace structure – annual training and NOT only by bulletin using two components: o Generic briefing on airspace Class E in Germany o Dedicated airport briefing documents o Include risk and threats in unprotected airspace in individual departure and arrival briefing • OPERATING RECOMMENDATIONS o FLY DEFENSIVELY! o Maintain Minimum Clean Airspeed or as slow as reasonable o Request to use protected airspace – minimise time in airspace Class E and refuse shortcuts if necessary. Most standard departures and approaches/transitions will facilitate this. o Descend according to airspace structure on arrival. Steep/expedited climb through airspace Class E on departure. o Consider airspace structure for engine out procedures o Consider delaying take-off if conflict with other aircraft is anticipated • USE OF AUTOMATION IN AIRSPACE CLASS ECHO o Minimise visual approaches – they require additional attention and increase flight time in unprotected airspace o Maximise lookout capacity through use of automation (FMS/task sharing) • SEE AND AVOID o Maximise lookout
    [Show full text]
  • ICAO State Action Plan on Emissions Reduction - Germany
    ICAO State Action Plan on Emissions Reduction - Germany - Page 1 out of 41 Impressum Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development Directorate General for Civil Aviation Robert-Schuman Platz 1 53175 Bonn Principal Contact Mr. Jan Bode Tel +49 228 99-300-4923 Fax +49 228 99-300-807-4923 E-Mail [email protected] Page 2 out of 41 INTRODUCTION 4 Current state of aviation in the Federal Republic of Germany 6 Structure of the aviation sector and its contribution to CO2 emissions 6 General Transport Data 8 Geographical characteristics 17 SECTION 1- Supra-national actions, including those led by the EU 17 1. Aircraft related Technology Development 17 2. Alternative Fuels 20 3. Improved Air Traffic Management and Infrastructure Use 23 4. Economic / market-based measures 26 5. Support to voluntary actions: ACI Airport Carbon Accreditation 28 SECTION 2- National Measures in Federal Republic of Germany 30 1. Aircraft related Technology Development 30 2. Alternative Fuels 34 3. Improved Air Traffic Management and Infrastructure Use 35 4. Economic / market-based measures 41 5. Support to voluntary actions: ACI Airport Carbon Accreditation 41 Annex 41 Page 3 out of 41 INTRODUCTION a) The Federal Republic of Germany is a Member of European Union and of the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC). ECAC is an intergovernmental organisation covering the widest grouping of Member States1 of any European organisation dealing with civil aviation. It is currently composed of 44 Member States, and was created in 1955. b) The ECAC States share the view that environmental concerns represent a potential constraint on the future development of the international aviation sector, and together they fully support ICAO’s ongoing efforts to address the full range of these concerns, including the key strategic challenge posed by climate change, for the sustainable development of international air transport.
    [Show full text]
  • The Restructuring of Berlin's Airport System and the City's Position In
    Missed Opportunities: The Restructuring of Berlin’s Airport System and the City’s Position in International Airline Networks Authors: Heike C. Alberts Department of Geography and Urban Planning University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh 800 Algoma Boulevard Oshkosh, WI 54901 Tel: (920) 424 7109 Fax: (920) 424 0292 Email: [email protected] John T. Bowen, Jr. Department of Geography and Urban Planning University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh 800 Algoma Boulevard Oshkosh, WI 54901 Tel: (920) 424 4103 Email: [email protected] Julie L. Cidell Department of Geography and Environmental Studies California State University San Bernadino 5500 University Parkway, SB 327 San Bernadino, CA 92407 Tel: (909) 538 3777 [email protected] 1 Missed Opportunities: The Restructuring of Berlin’s Airport System and the City’s Position in International Airline Networks Abstract After its history as a divided city, Berlin was expected to become a major world city following reunification. While the city has grown in terms of investment and social capital, it has not attained the preeminent status on the global stage that was expected. One important reason for this is that Berlin remains no more than a secondary hub in the global airline industry. In this article, we measure the city’s importance in airline networks at four points from 1989 to 2006. We then explain the city’s stature in those networks today as a product of both larger forces in the airline industry and circumstances more specific to Berlin. The former include liberalization and the development of airline alliances. In Berlin, meanwhile, the fractured airport system, which the city inherited from the Cold War, has been an obstacle to Berlin’s aspirations for centrality in the airline industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Markets Day 2019
    Capital Markets Day 2019 24th June 2019 Frankfurt Agenda Capital Markets Day 2019 11.00 am – 11.05 am 12.30 am – 01.30 pm 02.35 pm – 03.00 pm Welcome by Dennis Weber, Lunch Presentation Ulrik Svensson, Head of Investor Relations Chief Financial Officer 01.30 pm – 02.10 pm 11.05 am – 11.55 am Presentation Thorsten Dirks, 03.00 pm – 04.00 pm Presentation Carsten Spohr, Chief Executive Officer Eurowings Q&A Chairman of the Executive Board & Chief Executive Officer 02.10 pm – 02.35 pm 04.00 pm – 06.30 pm Presentation Dr. Detlef Kayser, First-hand Product Experience, 11.55 am – 12.30 am Chief Officer Airline Resources Simulator Experience / Cabin Training / Presentation Harry Hohmeister, & Operations Standards Product Stands / Networking Chief Commercial Officer Network Airlines 06.30 pm End of event Capital Markets Day 2019 Group Strategy Carsten Spohr, Chairman of the Executive Board and CEO 24th June 2019 Frankfurt #1 for all stakeholders – committed to drive sustainably higher returns . ROCE doubled since 2014; further improvement through the cycle . Free Cash Flow to exceed EUR 1bn medium-term Shareholders . Dividend payout increased to 20% to 40% of net income #1 #THEREISNOBETTER Customers Employees #THEREISNOBETTER WAYTOFLY PLACETOWORK CMD 2019 Group Strategy Page 2 Lufthansa Group has become a structurally more profitable company 7to1 program Key achievements Adj. EBIT margin & Adj. ROCE started 2014 Customer centricity and quality focus Lufthansa: Europe’s first 5 Star Airline New concepts 14.2% for growth Eurowings: #3 P2P carrier in Europe ~ x2 Effective and lean organization Removal of an entire management level 7.9% Innovation and Digitalization of key operational and 7.1% digitalization customer processes Culture and Performance culture: 3.9% leadership Bonus 100% linked to financials Value based steering Doubling of Adj.
    [Show full text]
  • B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 748/2009 Of
    02009R0748 — EN — 16.03.2018 — 011.001 — 1 This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions of the relevant acts, including their preambles, are those published in the Official Journal of the European Union and available in EUR-Lex. Those official texts are directly accessible through the links embedded in this document ►B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 748/2009 of 5 August 2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 219, 22.8.2009, p. 1) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Regulation (EU) No 82/2010 of 28 January 2010 L 25 12 29.1.2010 ►M2 Commission Regulation (EU) No 115/2011 of 2 February 2011 L 39 1 12.2.2011 ►M3 Commission Regulation (EU) No 394/2011 of 20 April 2011 L 107 1 27.4.2011 ►M4 Commission Regulation (EU) No 100/2012 of 3 February 2012 L 39 1 11.2.2012 ►M5 Commission Regulation (EU) No 109/2013 of 29 January 2013 L 40 1 9.2.2013 ►M6 Commission Regulation (EU) No 815/2013 of 27 August 2013 L 236 1 4.9.2013 ►M7 Commission Regulation (EU) No 100/2014 of 5 February 2014 L 37 1 6.2.2014 ►M8 Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/180 of 9 February 2015 L 34 1 10.2.2015 ►M9 Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/282 of 26 February 2016 L 56 1 2.3.2016 ►M10 Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/294 of 20 February
    [Show full text]
  • Lufthansa Decommissions Aircraft, Predicts Recovery Will Take Years Airline Also Deploys Passenger Aircraft on Large Scale for Dedicated Cargo Transport
    Lufthansa decommissions aircraft, predicts recovery will take years Airline also deploys passenger aircraft on large scale for dedicated cargo transport Eric Kulisch, Air Cargo Editor Tuesday, April 7, 2020 0 1,943 2 minutes read Lufthansa is retiring Airbus super-jumbo jets and other aircraft to right-size operations with demand. (Image: Flickr/Aero Icarus) Speculation that the demand destruction from the coronavirus will be long-lasting and result in a smaller airline industry after the pandemic is starting to become a reality. On Tuesday, Deutsche Lufthansa AG (CXE: LHA) announced a significant restructuring that includes a permanent reduction in capacity and the consolidation of several flight operations within the airline group. The company said the board of directors made the decisions because it expects global travel restrictions won’t be completely lifted for months and that it will take years until worldwide demand for air travel returns to levels before the coronavirus crisis. Vasu Raja, American Airlines’ senior vice president for network strategy, said in The Wall Street Journal that few people are making plans to travel in the next three to five months. The Lufthansa Group has already cut capacity by more than 90% and parked about 700 aircraft. Based on the estimate of a slow recovery, Lufthansa Airlines is decommissioning six Airbus A380 double-decker planes, seven A340-600s and five Boeing 747-400s. The carrier is also withdrawing 11 A320 single-aisle planes from short-haul operations. The six A380 aircraft were already scheduled to be sold back to Airbus in 2022. The decision to phase out the A340s and B747s was made because they burn more fuel and pollute more than more modern aircraft, Deutsche Lufthansa said.
    [Show full text]
  • DAQCP MEMBERS Created By: DAQCP Website Date: 20.07.2021
    DAQCP MEMBERS created by: DAQCP website Date: 20.07.2021 # 3-letter code Airline 1 FRH ACE BELGIUM FREIGHTERS 2 RUN ACT AIRLINES 3 AEE AEGEAN AIRLINES 4 EIN AER LINGUS 5 AFL AEROFLOT RUSSIAN AIRLINES 6 BOX AEROLOGIC 7 KZR AIR ASTANA 8 BTI AIR BALTIC 9 ACI AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL 10 DLA AIR DOLOMITI 11 AEA AIR EUROPA 12 OVA AIR EUROPA EXPRESS 13 GRL AIR GREENLAND 14 AMC AIR MALTA 15 MAU AIR MAURITIUS 16 ANE AIR NOSTRUM 17 ASL AIR SERBIA BELGRADE 18 ABW AIRBRIDGECARGO 19 AXE AIREXPLORE 20 LAV ALBASTAR 21 AZA ALITALIA 22 CYL ALITALIA CITYLINER 23 ANA ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS 24 AEH AMELIA INTERNATIONAL 25 TFL ARKEFLY - TUI AIRLINES NETHERLANDS 26 AIZ ARKIA ISRAELI AIRLINES 27 TAY ASL AIRLINES BELGIUM 28 ABR ASL AIRLINES IRELAND 29 FLI ATLANTIC AIRWAYS 30 AUA AUSTRIAN AIRLINES 31 AHY AZERBAIJAN AIRLINES 32 CFE BA CITYFLYER 33 BMS BLUE AIR 34 BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 35 BEL BRUSSELS AIRLINES 36 GNE BUSINESS AVIATION SERVICES GUERNSEY LTD 37 CLU CARGOLOGICAIR 38 CLX CARGOLUX AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL S.A 39 ICV CARGOLUX ITALIA 40 CEB CEBU PACIFIC 41 BCY CITYJET 42 CFG CONDOR FLUGDIENST GMBH 43 CTN CROATIA AIRLINES 44 CSA CZECH AIRLINES 45 DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 46 DHK DHL AIR LTD. 47 EZE EASTERN AIRWAYS 48 EJU EASYJET EUROPE 49 EZS EASYJET SWITZERLAND 50 EZY EASYJET UK 51 EDW EDELWEISS AIR 52 ELY EL AL 53 UAE EMIRATES 54 ETH ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 55 ETD ETIHAD AIRWAYS 56 MMZ EUROATLANTIC 57 BCS EUROPEAN AIR TRANSPORT 58 EWG EUROWINGS 59 OCN EUROWINGS DISCOVER 60 EWE EUROWINGS EUROPE 61 EVE EVELOP AIRLINES 62 FIN FINNAIR 63 FHY FREEBIRD AIRLINES 64 GJT GETJET AIRLINES 65 GFA GULF AIR 66 OAW HELVETIC AIRWAYS 67 HFY HI FLY 68 HBN HIBERNIAN AIRLINES 69 HOP HOP! 70 IBE IBERIA 71 ICE ICELANDAIR 72 ISR ISRAIR AIRLINES 73 JAL JAPAN AIRLINES CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Alliances
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2011 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Open Skies • 1992 - the United States concluded the first second generation “open skies” agreement with the Netherlands. It allowed KLM and any other Dutch carrier to fly to any point in the United States, and allowed U.S. carriers to fly to any point in the Netherlands, a country about the size of West Virginia. The U.S. was ideologically wedded to open markets, so the imbalance in traffic rights was of no concern. Moreover, opening up the Netherlands would allow KLM to drain traffic from surrounding airline networks, which would eventually encourage the surrounding airlines to ask their governments to sign “open skies” bilateral with the United States. • 1993 - the U.S. conferred antitrust immunity on the Wings Alliance between Northwest Airlines and KLM. The encirclement policy began to corrode resistance to liberalization as the sixth freedom traffic drain began to grow; soon Lufthansa, then Air France, were asking their governments to sign liberal bilaterals. • 1996 - Germany fell, followed by the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Malta, Poland. • 2001- the United States had concluded bilateral open skies agreements with 52 nations and concluded its first multilateral open skies agreement with Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore. • 2002 – France fell. • 2007 - The U.S. and E.U. concluded a multilateral “open skies” traffic agreement that liberalized everything but foreign ownership and cabotage. • 2011 – cumulatively, the U.S. had signed “open skies” bilaterals with more than100 States. Multilateral and Bilateral Air Transport Agreements • Section 5 of the Transit Agreement, and Section 6 of the Transport Agreement, provide: “Each contracting State reserves the right to withhold or revoke a certificate or permit to an air transport enterprise of another State in any case where it is not satisfied that substantial ownership and effective control are vested in nationals of a contracting State .
    [Show full text]
  • Signatory Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Carriers
    Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Signatory Carriers As of May 1, 2019 Carriers that are highlighted in yellow hold expired Visa Waiver Program Agreements and therefore are no longer authorized to transport VWP eligible passengers to the United States pursuant to the Visa Waiver Program Agreement Paragraph 14. When encountered, please remind them of the need to re-apply. # 21st Century Fox America, Inc. (04/07/2015) 245 Pilot Services Company, Inc. (01/14/2015) 258131 Aviation LLC (09/18/2013) 26 North Aviation Inc. 4770RR, LLC (12/06/2016) 51 CL Corp. (06/23/2017) 51 LJ Corporation (02/01/2016) 620, Inc. 650534 Alberta, Inc. d/b/a Latitude Air Ambulance (01/09/2017) 711 CODY, Inc. (02/09/2018) A A OK Jets A&M Global Solutions, Inc. (09/03/2014) A.J. Walter Aviation, Inc. (01/17/2014) A.R. Aviation, Corp. (12/30/2015) Abbott Laboratories Inc. (09/26/2012) ABC Aerolineas, S.A. de C.V. (d/b/a Interjet) (08/24/2011) Abelag Aviation NV d/b/a Luxaviation Belgium (02/27/2019) ABS Jets A.S. (05/07/2018) ACASS Canada Ltd. (02/27/2019) Accent Airways LLC (01/12/2015) Ace Aviation Services Corporation (08/24/2011) Ace Flight Center Inc. (07/30/2012) ACE Flight Operations a/k/a ACE Group (09/20/2015) Ace Flight Support ACG Air Cargo Germany GmbH (03/28/2011) ACG Logistics LLC (02/25/2019) ACL ACM Air Charter Luftfahrtgesellschaft GmbH (02/22/2018) ACM Aviation, Inc. (09/16/2011) ACP Jet Charter, Inc. (09/12/2013) Acromas Shipping Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • World Air Transport Statistics, Media Kit Edition 2021
    Since 1949 + WATSWorld Air Transport Statistics 2021 NOTICE DISCLAIMER. The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regulations. No subscriber or other reader should act on the basis of any such information without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/ or without taking appropriate professional advice. Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the International Air Transport Associ- ation shall not be held responsible for any loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misprints or misinterpretation of the contents hereof. Fur- thermore, the International Air Transport Asso- ciation expressly disclaims any and all liability to any person or entity, whether a purchaser of this publication or not, in respect of anything done or omitted, and the consequences of anything done or omitted, by any such person or entity in reliance on the contents of this publication. Opinions expressed in advertisements ap- pearing in this publication are the advertiser’s opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of IATA. The mention of specific companies or products in advertisement does not im- ply that they are endorsed or recommended by IATA in preference to others of a similar na- ture which are not mentioned or advertised. © International Air Transport Association. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, recast, reformatted or trans- mitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval sys- tem, without the prior written permission from: Deputy Director General International Air Transport Association 33, Route de l’Aéroport 1215 Geneva 15 Airport Switzerland World Air Transport Statistics, Plus Edition 2021 ISBN 978-92-9264-350-8 © 2021 International Air Transport Association.
    [Show full text]