DOCSLIB.ORG

Annex 1: EHRAC Database of North Caucasus Region European Court of Human Rights Judgments a B C D E F G H App

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annex 1: EHRAC Database of North Caucasus Region European Court of Human Rights Judgments a B C D E F G H App Annex 1: EHRAC Database of North Caucasus Region European Court of Human Rights Judgments A B C D E F G H App. Date of Date of Location of Aricles violated + Criminal Case name Unit identified 1 number judgment incident incident reason investign failings Art 2: EJE, Unconfirmed, believed to be federal military. Indiscriminate heavy shelling Isayeva 57950/00 24/02/2005 04/02/2000 Chechnya ALR,SHL, NECI; Art PI of Katyr-Yurt in special military operation. 2 13: RR 57497/00, Isayeva, Yusupova Art 2: SHL, ALR, FQA, DICP, FIVW, Fighter planes of the Russian military air force. Attacked refugee convoy on 57948/00, 24/02/2005 29/10/1999 Chechnya and Bazayeva NECI; Art 13: RR DDIE, FICP "Kavkaz" road between Shaami-Yurt and Achkhoy-Martan. 3 57950/00 Khashiyev and 57942/00, 12/1999- Art 2: EJE, NECI; DICP, FIVW, FCA, 24/02/2005 Chechnya "205th Brigade from Budenovsk" in investigation file. Akayeva 57945/00 01/2000 Art 13: RR FDM, PI 4 Art 2: DIS & NECI, A had videotape showing interrogation of her son by a Colonel-General. Bazorkina 69481/01 06/01/2006 02/02/2000 Chechnya Art 3: ADA, Art 5: DICP, DQA, DQW Invest established he had been detained and handed over to servicement UD, Art: 13: RR from GUIN for transportation to pre-trial detention centre 5 Estamirov and Art 2: EJE, NECI; DQW, FCA, FIVW, 60272/00 12/10/2006 05/02/2000 Chechnya Russian military, OMON 6 others Art 13: RR FICP 17/12/2000 Art 2: DIS, NECI; (2nd victim), Art 3: ADA; Art 5: Unconfirmed. "Russian military" in case of first second victim. "20 Imakayeva 7615/02 09/11/2006 Chechnya PI, FICP 02/06/2002 UD; Art 8: RH; Art servicemen in military camouflage uniforms..some of them wearing masks. (1st victim) 13: RR 7 Art 2: DIS, EJE, NECI; Art 3: ADA; PI, DDIE, FIVW, Unconfirmed, described as "a group of servicemen, wearing camouflage Luluyev and others 69480/01 09/11/2006 03/06/2000 Chechnya Art 5: UD; Art 13: DICP uniforms and masks and armed with machine guns". 8 RR Sheydayev 65859/01 07/12/2006 21/12/1999 Dagestan Art 3: AIT n/a n/a 9 Art 3: AIT, NECI; Art Chitayev and 5: UD, NJR, ADR, 59334/00 18/01/2007 12/04/2000 Chechnya FIVW Achkhoy-Martan VOVD Chitayev NRPT, NC; Art 13: 10 RR Art 2: DIS, NECI; A had videotape showing apprehension of husband by military servicemen. Baysayeva 74237/01 05/04/2007 02/03/2000 Chechnya Art 3: AIT; Art 5: DQA, DQW, FIVW G did not contest that husband arrested by armed men in camouflage UD; Art 13: RR uniform nor did they suggest they belonged to illegal paramilitaries. 11 1 © EHRAC 2012. Database key on page 19 Annex 1: EHRAC Database of North Caucasus Region European Court of Human Rights Judgments A B C D E F G H App. Date of Date of Location of Aricles violated + Criminal Case name Unit identified 1 number judgment incident incident reason investign failings Art 2: DIS, EJE, Unconfirmed, "a group of armed people" wearing "milk grey uniforms" in Akhmadova and NECI; Art 3: ADA; PI, DQW, DQA 40464/02 10/05/2007 Mar-01 Chechnya applicant's account. Placed victim in APC. Two other APCs and one UAV Sadulayeva Art 5: UD, Art 13: FICP, FCA, FICP also seen at scene. 12 RR Art 2: DIS, NECI; 57953/00, Unconfirmed, "about 20 men in military uniforms, some wearing balaclava Bitiyeva and X 21/06/2007 25/01/200 Chechnya Art 3: AIT; Art 5: FICP, FCA 37392/03 masks" in applicant's account. 13 UD; Art 13: RR Unconfirmed, "armed men wearing camouflage uniforms of the Russian Art 2: DIS, NECI; PI, DQA, DQW, armed forces and masks using two APCs, UAZ vehicles and helicopters" in Alikhadzhiyeva 68007/01 05/07/2007 May-00 Chechnya Art 3: ADA; Art 5: FICP applicant's account. Took victim and five others either to meat-packing UD, Art 13: RR 14 factory or a grain elevator. Art 2: DIS, NECI; Magomadov and PI, FQW, FIVW, 68004/01 12/07/2007 02/10/2000 Chechnya Art 3: ADA; Art 5: Federal Security Service ("FSB"). Magomadov DICP 15 UD 57941/00, Art 2: EJE, NECI; Musayev and DQW, DICP, FDM, 58699/00, 26/07/2007 05/02/2000 Chechnya Art 3: AIT; Art 13: OMON (from St. Petersburg and Ryazan region) others PI 16 60403/00 RR Unconfirmed,believed to be Russian military. APC in which victims taken Art 2: EJE, NECI; Musayeva and FICP, PI, FCA, away bore number 108, belonged to Main Intelligence Department of the 74239/01 26/07/2007 08/08/2000 Chechnya Art 3: VIT; Art 5: others FIVW, FQW Ministry of Defence of Russia. Events unfolded in course of "sweeping" UD; Art 13:RR 17 operation in the vicinity of Gekhi. Art 2: ALR, NECI; PI, FQW, FIVW, Unconfirmed, "federal forces" in applicant's account. Identified as " '205th Goncharuk 58643/00 04/10/2007 19/01/2000 Chechnya 18 Art 13: RR FDM Brigade' " in investigation documentation. Art 2: EJE, NECI; DQW, FIVW, FCA, Goygova 74240/01 04/10/2007 Jan-00 Chechnya 205th Brigade, OMON 19 Art 13: RR FICP, FBR Art 2: ALR, SHL, PI, FIVW, DICP, 205th Brigade (stationed in Budenovsk), OMON (from North Western Makhauri 58701/00 04/10/2007 21/01/2000 Chechnya 20 NECI; Art 13: RR FDM, DDIE region) identified as "suspect units". Art 3: NECI; Art 13: Medov 1573/02 08/11/2007 23/01/2000 Chechnya OMON (from Rostov-on-Don region) 21 RR Art 6: DAC, PNEJ, Khamidov 72118/01 15/11/2007 13/10/1999 Chechnya F/ACC; Arts 8 and Tambov consolidated police units of the Ministry of the Interior. 22 A1P1: TOAE, DIAE Art 2: DIS, NECI; Khamila Isayeva 6846/02 15/11/2007 29/04/2001 Chechnya Art 3: ADA; Art 5: FQW, FIVW, FICP Unconfirmed, about 20 soldiers who arrived in two APCs. 23 UD; Art 13: RR Art 2: DIS, NECI; FQW, FIVW, Kukayev 29361/02 15/11/2007 26/11/2000 Chechnya Art 3: ADA, NECI, Federal servicemen carrying out a "sweeping up" operation. DICP 24 Art 13: RR Art 2: EJE, NECI; PI, FIVW, FQW, Tangiyeva 57935/00 29/11/2007 Jan-00 Chechnya OMON, Russian military- soldiers of the "205th Brigade". 25 Art 13: RR FCA, FICP 2 © EHRAC 2012. Database key on page 19 Annex 1: EHRAC Database of North Caucasus Region European Court of Human Rights Judgments A B C D E F G H App. Date of Date of Location of Aricles violated + Criminal Case name Unit identified 1 number judgment incident incident reason investign failings PI, FIVW, DQW, Art 2: NECI; Art 13: Zubayrayev 67797/01 10/01/2008 17/09/2000 Chechnya FCA, FBR, DDIE, Spetsnaz. RR 26 FICP Ingushetia Khatsiyeva and Art 2: SHL & NECI, FBR, FCA, FIVW, 5108/02 17/01/2008 06/08/2000 (border with Russian military others Art 13: RR FICP, PI Chechnya) 27 Art 2: DIS, NECI; Unconfirmed, "a gorup of eight armed men wearing camouflage uniforms PI, DQW, FIVW, Aziyevy 77626/01 20/03/2008 24/09/2000 Chechnya Art 3: ADA, AIT; Art and masks and carrying torches" in applicant's account. Believed to be FICP 5: UD, Art 13: RR Russian military (spoke Russian, moved around freely during curfew). 28 Art 2: DIS, NECI; Approximately 20 federal servicement in six APCs, armed, all save two Kaplanova 7653/02 29/04/2008 12/05/2001 Chechnya Art 5: UD, Art 13: PI, FIVW, DICP masked, spoke Russian without accent. Allegedly demanded gold and 29 RR money. Unconfirmed, "about twenty armed men in camouflage uniforms…All but Art 2: DIS, NECI; three of them were wearing camouflage masks" in applicant's account. Betayev and Art 3: ADA; Art 5: 37315/03 29/05/2008 25/04/2003 Chechnya PI, DQW, FICP Convoy in which victims believed to have disappeared reportedly passed Betayeva UD, Art 8: RH; Art through military checkpoint without stopping. "Unidentified persons armed 13: RR with machine guns " in Government's account. 30 Art 2: DIS, NECI; Gekhayeva and Unconfirmed, "twenty men wearing blue uniforms and balaclava masks" in 1755/04 29/05/2008 15/05/2003 Chechnya Art 3: ADA; Art 5: DQW, FICP others applicant's account. Spoke Russian, believed to be Russian military. 31 UD, Art 13: RR Unconfirmed, "a group of five men wearing camouflage uniforms…[t]hree of [whom] were wearing balaclava masks" in applicant's account. Believed to Art 2: DIS, NECI; Ibragimov and be federal military/security servicement (spoke Russian without accent, 34561/03 29/05/2008 28/01/2002 Chechnya Art 3: ADA; Art 5: DQA, DQW, FICP others Slavic facial features, moved freely during curfew). "Unidentified persons UD, Art 13: RR armed with machine guns and wearing camouflage uniforms and masks" in Government's account. 32 Art 2: DIS, NECI; PI, FIVW, FQW, Unconfirmed, believed to be Russian military. Urus-Martan District Sangariyeva 1839/04 29/05/2008 23/01/2003 Chechnya Art 3: ADA; Art 5: FICP Department of Federal Security Service ("FSB") implicated. 33 UD; Art 13: RR Unconfirmed, believed to be Russian military. APCs bearing hull numbers Art 2: DIS, NECI; Utsayeva and PI, FIVW, FQW, 569, 889 and 1252 seen at scene of disappearance. Hull number of UAZ 29133/03 29/05/2008 02/06/2002 Chechnya Art 3: ADA, VIT; Art others FICP vehicle at scene of disappearance also partially seen- 344.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Numéro De Dossier File-Number
    Numéro de dossier File-number COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS Conseil de l’Europe – Council of Europe Strasbourg, France REQUÊTE APPLICATION Timishev v. Russia présentée en application de l’article 34 de la Convention européenne des Droits de l’Homme, ainsi que des articles 45 et 47 du règlement de la Court under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights And Rules 45 and 47 of the Rules of the Court 1 I. THE PARTIES A. THE APPLICANT 1. Surname: Timishev 2. First name(s:) Ilyas Yakubovich Sex: male 3. Nationality: Russian 4. Occupation: Attorney at Law 5. Date and place of birth: 13.10.1950, USSR 6. Permanent Address: ……………………., Nalchik, Russia. 7. Tel. No.: ………………….. 8. Present address (if different from 6.): …………................., Grozny, Russia. 9. Name of Representatives: (1) James A. Goldston, Julia Harrington, Open Society Justice Initiative; (2) Vladimir Luzin 10. Occupation of Representatives: (1) Executive Director, Senior Legal Officer and Attorneys-at-Law; (2) Attorney, Lawyer, Nizhny Novgorod Committee Against Torture 11. Address of Representatives: (1) Open Society Justice Initiative, Oktober 6.u. 12. 7th Floor, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary . (2) Nizhny Novgorod Committee Against Torture Office 303, 11 Kozhevennaya Str. Nizhny Novgorod, 603001 Russia 12. Tel No. (1) +1-212-548-0347 (2) +7-831-433-1404 ___________________________________ B. THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTY 13. The Russian Federation 2 Introduction This application concerns discriminatory restrictions on the freedom of movement imposed upon people of Chechen and Ingush ethnicity. Since 1991 the Russian authorities have established a series of checkpoints on the two main roads between Nalchik in Karbardino-Balkaria and Grozny in Chechnya, severely restricting freedom of movement from one city to the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Sector Field Directory
    HEALTH SECTOR FIELD DIRECTORY Republic of Chechnya Republic of Ingushetia Russian Federation June 2004 World Health Organization Nazran, Republic of Ingushetia TABLE OF CONTENTS ORGANIZATION 1. Agency for Rehabilitation and Development (ARD/Denal) 2. CARE Canada 3. Centre for Peacemaking and Community Development (CPCD) 4. Danish Refugee Council/Danish Peoples Aid (DRC/DPA) 5. Hammer FOrum e. V. 6. Handicap International 7. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) 8. International Humanitarian Initiative (IHI) 9. International Medical Corps (IMC) 10. Islamic Relief (IR) 11. International Rescue Committee (IRC) 12. Medecins du Monde (MDM) 13. Medecins Sans Frontieres – Belgium (MSF-B) 14. Error! Reference source not found. 15. Medecins Sans Frontieres - Holland (MSF-H) 16. Medecins Sans Frontieres - Switzerland (MSF-CH) 17. Memorial 18. People in Need (PIN) 19. Polish Humanitarian Organisation (PHO) 20. Save the Generation 21. SERLO 22. UNICEF 23. World Vision 24. World Health Organization (WHO) 2 Agency for Rehabilitation and Development (ARD/Denal) Sector: Health; Food; Non-Food Items; Education Location: Chechnya and Ingushetia Objectives: To render psychosocial support to people affected by the conflict; to provide specialised medical services for women and medical aid for the IDP population; to support education and recreational activities; to supply supplementary food products to vulnerable IDP categories with specific nutritional needs; to provide basic hygienic items and clothes for new-born; to help the IDP community to establish a support system for its members making use of available resources. Beneficiaries: IDP children, youth, women and men in Ingushetia and residents in Chechnya Partners: UNICEF, SDC/SHA CONTACT INFORMATION: INGUSHETIA Moscow Karabulak, Evdoshenko St.
    [Show full text]
  • Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya
    Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya Egor Lazarev Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2018 Egor Lazarev All rights reserved ABSTRACT Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya Egor Lazarev This dissertation explores how the social and political consequences of armed conflict affect legal pluralism; specifically, the coexistence of Russian state law, Sharia, and customary law in Chechnya. The study draws on qualitative and quantitative data gathered during seven months of fieldwork in Chechnya. The data include over one hundred semistructured interviews with legal authorities and religious and traditional leaders; an original survey of the population; and a novel dataset of all civil and criminal cases heard in state courts. First, the dissertation argues that armed conflict disrupted traditional social hierarchies in Chechnya, which paved the way for state penetration into Chechen society. The conflict particularly disrupted gender hierarchies. As a result of the highly gendered nature of the conflict, women in Chechnya became breadwinners in their families and gained experience in serving important social roles, most notably as interlocutors between communities and different armed groups. This change in women’s bargaining power within households and increase in their social status came into conflict with the patriarchal social order, which was based on men’s rigid interpretations of religious and customary norms. In response, women started utilizing the state legal system, a system that at least formally acknowledges gender equality, in contrast to customary law and Sharia.
    [Show full text]
  • 1222 RUS Khashiyev H/Exec Disappearance Cases
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND RULE OF LAW DIRECTORATE OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEPARTMENT FOR THE EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS H/Exec(2015)5 rev – 20 August 2015 ——————————————— Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russian Federation (No. 57942/00) group of cases Overview of the Court’s judgments concerning enforced disappearances in the North Caucasus Memorandum prepared by the Department for the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights ——————————————— The opinions expressed in this document are binding on neither the Committee of Ministers nor the European Court. This document contains an overview of the judgments delivered by the European Court against the Russian Federation concerning enforced disappearances in the North Caucasus between 1999 and 2006 (Khashiyev and Akayeva group of cases). It also indicates the fate of the disappeared persons, where known, at the time of the examination by the European Court. 1 http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution/ 2 Case name Disappeared Facts as established by the Criminal investigation file, as Fate of disappeared persons Violations Application no. persons (name Court noted in the Court’s judgment as indicated in the Court’s found Date of definitive and year of birth) judgments (where known) judgment Bazorkina Mr Khadzhi-Murat The applicant’s son was Case no. 19112 opened on 14 July Unknown. Art. 2 69481/01 Yandiyev (1975) detained on 2 February 2000 2001 by the Chechnya Prosecutor’s (substantive 11/12/2006 by State servicemen during a Office under Article 126 § 2 of the and counter-terrorist operation in Criminal Code (aggravated procedural), the village of Alkhan-Kala kidnapping).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Situation of Residents of Chechnya in the Russian Federation
    MEMORIAL Human Rights Center Migration Rights Network Edited by Svetlana A. Gannushkina On the Situation of Residents of Chechnya in the Russian Federation August 2006 – October 2007 Moscow 2007 1 Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. The project is funded by the European Commission Based on the materials gathered by the Migration Rights Network, Memorial Human Rights Center, Civic Assistance Committee, Internet Publication Caucasian Knot, SOVA Information and Analysis Center, and others S.A. Gannushkina, Head of the Migration Rights Network, Chairwoman of the Civic Assistance Committee L.Sh. Simakova, compiler of the Report Other contributors to the Report included: E. Burtina, S. Magomedov, Sh. Tangiyev, N. Estemirova The Migration Rights Network of Memorial Human Rights Center has 56 offices providing free legal assistance to forced migrants, including five offices located in Chechnya and Ingushetia (www.refugee.memo.ru). In Moscow lawyers from the Migration Rights Network use the charitable Civic Assistance Committee for Refugee Aid as their base (www.refugee.ru). ISBN 978-5-93439-246-9 Distributed free of charge 2 Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. CONTENTS I. Introduction............................................................................................................5 II. Svetlana Gannushkina’s speech at the seminar for administrative law judges in Hohenheim, Germany (November 25, 2006): Chechen refugees and the EU qualification rules....................................................................................................6 III. Living conditions and security situation of internally displaced persons and residents of the Chechen Republic......................................................................18 IV. Situation of people from Chechnya in the Republic of Ingushetia......................42 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Information on Chechnya
    Background Information on Chechnya A study by Alexander Iskandarian This study was commissioned by UNHCR. The views expressed in this study by the author, Director of the Moscow-based Centre for Studies on the Caucasus, do not necessarily represent those of UNHCR. Moscow, December 2000 1. Background information on Chechnya Under Article 65 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Republic of Chechnya is mentioned as one of the 89 subjects of the Federation. Chechnya officially calls itself the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria. It is situated in the east of the Northern Caucasus, with an area of around 15,100 square kilometres (borders with the Republic of Ingushetia have not been delimited; in the USSR, both republics were part of the Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Republic). According to the Russian State Committee on Statistics, as of January 1993, Chechnya had a population of around 1,100,000. There are no reliable data concerning the current population of Chechnya. Chechens are the largest autochthonous nation of the Northern Caucasus. By the last Soviet census of 1989, there were 958,309 Chechens in the USSR, 899,000 of them in the SSR of Russia, including 734,500 in Checheno-Ingushetia and 58,000 in adjacent Dagestan where Chechens live in a compact community.1 The largest Chechen diaspora outside Russia used to be those in Kazakhstan (49,500 people) and Jordan (around 5,000). One can expect the diaspora to have changed dramatically as a result of mass migrations. Chechnya has always had a very high population growth rate, a high birth rate and one of the lowest percentages of city dwellers in Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SITUATION of Idps from CHECHNYA
    WRITENET Paper No. 11 /2002 RUSSIAN FEDERATION: THE SITUATION OF IDPs FROM CHECHNYA John B. Dunlop Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution May 2002 WriteNet is a Network of Researchers and Writers on Human Rights, Forced Migration, Ethnic and Political Conflict WriteNet is a Subsidiary of Practical Management (UK) E-mail: [email protected] THIS PAPER WAS PREPARED MAINLY ON THE BASIS OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION, ANALYSIS AND COMMENT. ALL SOURCES ARE CITED. THE PAPER IS NOT, AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE, EITHER EXHAUSTIVE WITH REGARD TO CONDITIONS IN THE COUNTRY SURVEYED, OR CONCLUSIVE AS TO THE MERITS OF ANY PARTICULAR CLAIM TO REFUGEE STATUS OR ASYLUM. THE VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THE PAPER ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHOR AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF WRITENET OR UNHCR. ISSN 1020-8429 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction....................................................................................................3 2 The Current Political Situation in Ingushetia ............................................3 3 The Likely Return of Chechen IDPs from Ingushetia to Chechnya.........5 4 The Current Political Situation in Chechnya .............................................8 5 The Position of Inner IDPs Residing in Chechnya.....................................8 6 The Role of the UN and Other International IGOs and NGOs in Chechnya ......................................................................................................11 7 Three Scenarios for the Future ..................................................................12 8 Bibliography.................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Final 06/04/2009
    CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST SECTION CASE OF ZULPA AKHMATOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 13569/02 and 13573/02) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 9 October 2008 FINAL 06/04/2009 This judgment may be subject to editorial revision. ZULPA AKHMATOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Zulpa Akhmatova and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Christos Rozakis, President, Anatoly Kovler, Elisabeth Steiner, Khanlar Hajiyev, Dean Spielmann, Sverre Erik Jebens, Giorgio Malinverni, judges, and André Wampach, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 18 September 2008, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last-mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in two applications (nos. 13569/02 and 13573/02) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by six Russian nationals, listed below (“the applicants”), on 19 March 2002. 2. The applicants, who had been granted legal aid, were represented by lawyers of the Stichting Russian Justice Initiative (“SRJI”), an NGO based in the Netherlands with a representative office in Russia. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr P. Laptev and Ms V. Milinchuk, former Representatives of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. 3. The applicants alleged that their three relatives had disappeared after being detained by servicemen in Chechnya on 14 January 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft—August 1995
    “RUSSIA’S TINDERBOX” Conflict in the North Caucasus And its Implications for The Future of the Russian Federation Fiona Hill September 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Background to the Report Introduction Executive Summary Section I The Structural Legacy of the USSR Section II The Crisis of National and Regional Leadership in the North Caucasus Section III The Failure of Russia’s Regional Policy Section IV Territorial Disputes in the North Caucasus Section V Chechnya Appendix 1 The Refugee Crisis in the North Caucasus Appendix 2 The Islamic Factor in the North Caucasus Bibliography Selected Works in English for Additional Reading on the North Caucasus PREFACE Background to the Report In the Summer of 1993, the Strengthening Democratic Institutions Project began an inquiry into the conflicts in Russia’s North Caucasus region, as part of a broader study of post-Soviet ethno- political conflicts. In the course of this inquiry, it became apparent that there were practically no contemporary English-language studies of the North Caucasus. Although the new Transcaucasian states of Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan were beginning to be studied more closely as a consequence of their new status as independent states after 1991, information on the Russian North Caucasus region was only available from news wires and the occasional flying visits of Western correspondents. This was in spite of the prevalence of violent conflict in the Caucasus as a whole, the involvement of North Caucasian groups in these conflicts, and Chechnya’s 1991 declaration of independence from the Russian Federation. By 1993, Azerbaijan and Armenia had been in a de facto state of war over Nagorno- Karabakh for almost five years; an armed conflict had flared between Georgia and South Ossetia sending a wave of refugees into North Ossetia in the North Caucasus; North Caucasian mercenaries were fighting on the side of Abkhazia in its war with Georgia; and a violent conflict had erupted within the North Caucasus itself between Ossetians and Ingush.
    [Show full text]
  • North Caucasus Situation Report No. 50
    Danish Refugee Council ASF / Danish People’s Aid North Caucasus Situation Report No. 50 DRC/ASF PROGRAM OF EMERGENCY AND REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO THE VICTIMS OF THE ARMED CONFLICT IN CHECHNYA 30 June 2002 In the news The DRC wishes to stress that the content of this particular chapter are quotes from the Russian and international press and do not necessarily express the opinion of DRC. The head of the government of the Republic of Ingushetia, Akhmet Other News Malsagov, has unexpectedly tendered his resignation, the republican government's press-service reported on June 12. The press service The authorities of the Chechen did not specify the reasons behind Malsagov's move, noting that it Republic could accommodate the was the minister's personal decision. It is not known whether the Chechen refugees residing in Georgia's Pankisi Gorge, Federal Minister for resignation is to be accepted by Ingushetia's President Murat Chechen Affairs Vladimir Yelagin told a Zyazikov, who is not present in the republic at the moment. Malsagov press conference on June 3. "I think we retained the post of prime minister after Zyazikov was elected are capable to ensure social and president, but only managed to work in the new team for about three economic rehabilitation for temporarily weeks. [RIA-Novosti] displaced persons from Pankisi," he said. In his opinion, it is not that easy to More than half of the approximately 150,000 people forced from their solve this problem because of complex homes during the current Chechen conflict are mothers and children, relations with the Georgian authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Conseil De L'europe Council of Europe Cour Européenne Des Droits De L'homme European Court of Human Rights
    CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURTOFHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 58643/00 by Yelena Vitalyevna GONCHARUK against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 18 May 2006 as a Chamber composed of: Mr C.L. ROZAKIS, President, Mr L. LOUCAIDES, Mrs F. TULKENS, Mrs N. VAJIĆ, Mr A. KOVLER, Mr D. SPIELMANN, Mr S.E. JEBENS, judges and Mr S. NIELSEN, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 3 February 2000, Having regard to the decisions to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mrs. Yelena Vitalyevna Goncharuk, is a Russian national who was born in 1962. Before 2000 she was a resident of Grozny, Chechnya, which she left for Ingushetia. She currently resides in Norway where she sought asylum. The applicant is represented before the Court by Ms D. Vedernikova, Mr Kirill Koroteev, Mr Philip Leach and Mr William 2 GONCHARUK v. RUSSIA DECISION Bowring, lawyers of EHRAC/Memorial, a human rights NGO with offices in London, as well as in Moscow and in the Northern Caucasus. The respondent Government are represented by Mr P.A. Laptev, the Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. A. The circumstances of the case The submissions of the parties on the facts concerning the circumstances of the events of 19 January 2000 and the ensuing investigation are set out in Sections 1 - 2 below.
    [Show full text]
  • Member States' Duty to Co-Operate with the European Court of Human Rights
    Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire Doc. 11183 9 February 2007 Member states’ duty to co-operate with the European Court of Human Rights Report Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights Rapporteur: Mr Christos Pourgourides, Cyprus, Group of the European People's Party Summary As all states parties to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) have undertaken not to hinder in any way the effective exercise of the right of individual applications (Article 34 of the Convention), the Committee is deeply worried about the fact that a number of cases involving the alleged killing, disappearance, beating or threatening of applicants initiating cases before the Court have still have not been fully and effectively investigated by the competent authorities. On the contrary, in a significant number of cases there are clear signs of lack of willingness to effectively investigate the allegations and in some cases the intention of whitewashing is clearly apparent. Illicit pressure has also been brought to bear on lawyers who defend applicants before the Court, and who assist victims of human rights violations in exhausting national remedies before applying to the Court. Such pressure has included trumped-up criminal charges, discriminatory tax inspections and threats of prosecution for “abuse of office”. Similar pressure has been brought to bear on NGOs who assist applicants in preparing their cases. The Committee therefore urges all member states to fully co-operate with the Court and in particular to cease acts of intimidation against applicants and their lawyers. Furthermore, they should take robust action to prosecute and punish the perpetrators and instigators of such acts, in such a way as to send out a clear message that such action will not be tolerated by the authorities.
    [Show full text]