DOCSLIB.ORG

2005 – 2006 38

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2005 – 2006 38 This annual report is the first produced in accordance with ICANN’s com- mitments under the Joint Project Agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce, which was signed in September of 2006. The report is initially being published on the ICANN website, http://www. icann.org, to open a period for comments aimed at improving its content and meaningfulness of the report to the ICANN community in the future. Comments and suggestions from the community are encouraged. Every effort will be made to respond to suggestions for constructive improvement. A forum for submitting comments and suggestions is available at 2006- [email protected]. Comments can be viewed at http://forum.icann. org/lists/2006-ar-comments/. ICANN is a global corporation existing in the online environment. It aspires to be an innovator and leader in the areas of transparency, accountability and accessibility. Therefore, ICANN has established a blog on the ICANN website so that members of the community can exchange their views about the report. The blog can be found at http://blog.icann.org/. This inaugural annual report covers both the calendar and fiscal year in an attempt to capture the many activities and accomplishments of the entire ICANN community over the past year. The next annual report will be based on the 2006-2007 fiscal year and will include the relevant audit reports. It is expected that the annual report for 2006-2007 will be published during the third quarter of 2007. *BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2006 Vinton G. Cerf Chairman of the Board November 1999 – December 2007 Alejandro Pisanty Vice Chair November 1999 – June 2007 Paul Twomey President and Chief Executive Officer Ex-officio member Raimundo Beca May 2004 – June 2007 Susan P. Crawford December 2005 – December 2008 Steve Crocker Security and Stability Advisory Committee Liaison Daniel Dardailler Technical Liaison Group Liaison Peter Dengate Thrush Hualin Qian January 2005 – June 2008 June 2003 – December 2006 Roberto Gaetano Njeri Rionge At-Large Advisory Committee Liaison June 2003 – December 2008 Demi Getschko Rita Rodin January 2005 – June 2009 June 2006 – May 2008 Hagen Hultzsch Vanda Scartezini October 2003 – December 2006 December 2004 – December 2007 Joichi Ito Mohamed Sharil Tarmizi December 2004 – December 2007 Governmental Advisory Committee Liaison Veni Markovski David L. Wodelet June 2003 – December 2006 June 2006 – June 2009 Thomas Narten Suzanne Woolf Internet Engineering Task Force Liaison Root Server System Advisory Committee Liaison *Dates reflect full terms on the Board *BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2007 Vinton G. Cerf Chairman of the Board November 1999 – December 2007 Roberto Gaetano Vice Chair December 2006 – December 2009 Paul Twomey President and Chief Executive Officer Ex-officio member Raimundo Beca May 2004 – June 2007 Vittorio Bertola At-Large Advisory Committee Liaison Susan P. Crawford December 2005 – December 2008 Steve Crocker Alejandro Pisanty Security and Stability Advisory Committee Liaison November 1999 – December 2007 Francisco da Silva Rajasekhar Ramaraj Technical Liaison Group Liaison December 2006 – December 2009 Peter Dengate Thrush Njeri Rionge January 2005 – June 2008 June 2003 – December 2008 Demi Getschko Rita Rodin January 2005 – June 2009 June 2006 – May 2008 Steven Goldstein Vanda Scartezini December 2006 – December 2009 December 2004 – December 2007 Joichi Ito Mohamed Sharil Tarmizi December 2004 – December 2007 Governmental Advisory Committee Liaison until March 2007 Ambassador Janis Karklins Governmental Advisory Committee Liaison David L. Wodelet beginning March 2007 June 2006 – June 2009 Thomas Narten Suzanne Woolf Internet Engineering Task Force Liaison Root Server System Advisory Committee Liaison *Dates reflect full terms on the Board TABLE OF CONTENTS ICANN’s Mission 6 ICANN’s Values 6 ICANN’s Structure 7 Message from the Chairman of the Board of Directors 8 Message from the President and Chief Executive Officer 9 New Agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce 10 Strategic Plan for the Next Three Years 12 Operating Plan for 2006 – 2007 13 Management of Operating Plan Objectives 13 Progress on Operating Plan Projects 14 ICANN Meetings 15 Activities of ICANN Advisory Committees and Supporting Organisations 18 Reports of Activities from ICANN Divisions 22 Activities of Nominating Committee 31 Appendix - Activities Relating to ICANN’s Responsibilities 32 Audit Report for Fiscal Year 2005 – 2006 38 Glossary of Terms 44 OUR MISSION Since ICANN’s creation in 1998, the Internet community has vigorously discussed and reviewed the mission and values that guide its actions. This extensive, inclusive and bottom up discussion has been encapsulated in ICANN’s bylaws, its mission and its core values. The limited and distinct mission of ICANN is clearly set out in Article I of its bylaws: The mission of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is to coordinate, at the overall level, the global Internet’s systems of unique identifiers, and in particular to ensure the stable and secure operation of the Internet’s unique identifier systems. In particular, ICANN: 1. Coordinates the allocation and assignment of the three sets of unique identifiers for the Internet, which are: a. Domain names (forming a system referred to as DNS) b. Internet protocol (IP) addresses and autonomous system (AS) numbers, and c. Protocol port and parameter numbers 2. Coordinates the operation and evolution of the DNS root name server system 3. Coordinates policy development reasonably and appropriately related to these technical functions OUR CORE VALUES In performing ICANN’s mission, the following core values 8. Making decisions by applying documented policies guides its decisions and actions. neutrally and objectively, with integrity and fairness. 1. Preserving and enhancing the operational stability, 9. Acting with a speed that is responsive to the needs of the reliability, security, and global interoperability of the Internet while, as part of the decision-making process, Internet. obtaining informed input from those entities most affected. 2. Respecting the creativity, innovation, and flow of 10. Remaining accountable to the Internet community through information made possible by the Internet by limiting mechanisms that enhance ICANN’s effectiveness. ICANN’s activities to those matters within ICANN’s mission requiring or significantly benefiting from global 11. While remaining rooted in the private sector, recognising coordination. that governments and public authorities are responsible for public policy and duly taking into account governments’ or 3. To the extent feasible and appropriate, delegating public authorities’ recommendations. coordination functions to or recognising the policy role of other responsible entities that reflect the interests of These core values are deliberately expressed in very affected parties. general terms, so that they may provide useful and relevant guidance in the broadest possible range of circumstances. 4. Seeking and supporting broad, informed participation Because they are not narrowly prescriptive, the specific way reflecting the functional, geographic, and cultural diversity in which they apply, individually and collectively, to each of the Internet at all levels of policy development and new situation will necessarily depend on many factors that decision-making. cannot be fully anticipated or enumerated; and because they are statements of principle rather than practice, situations 5. Where feasible and appropriate, depending on market will inevitably arise in which perfect fidelity to all eleven core mechanisms to promote and sustain a competitive values simultaneously is not possible. Any ICANN body environment. making a recommendation or decision shall exercise its judgment to determine which core values are most relevant 6. Introducing and promoting competition in the registration and how they apply to the specific circumstances of the case of domain names where practicable and beneficial in the at hand, and to determine, if necessary, an appropriate and public interest. defensible balance among competing values. 7. Employing open and transparent policy development mechanisms that (i) promote well-informed decisions based on expert advice, and (ii) ensure that those entities most affected can assist in the policy development process. 6 ICANN’S STRUCTURE Within ICANN’s structure, governments and international treaty organisations work with business organisations and individuals to maintain the stability of the global Internet. Innovation as well as continuing growth bring constant challenges to stability. Working together, ICANN participants address issues that are directly concerned with ICANN’s mission of technical coordination. ICANN is governed by an international Board of Directors. The policy development process originates in three supporting organisations. Advisory committees composed of representatives from individual user organisations and technical communities work with the supporting organisations to create policy. In addition, over 120 governments and government institutions closely advise the Board via the Governmental Advisory Committee. Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Security and Ombudsman Stability Advisory BOARD OF Committee (SSAC) President/CEO DIRECTORS Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC) ICANN Staff Technical Liaison Group (TLG) Address Generic Names Country Code Supporting Supporting Names Supporting Organisation Organisation Organisation (ASO)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Internet and Isi: Four Decades of Innovation
    THE INTERNET AND ISI: FOUR DECADES OF INNOVATION ROD BECKSTROM President and Chief Executive Officer Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 40th Anniversary of USC Information Sciences Institute 26 April 2012 As prepared for delivery It’s an honor to be here today to mark the 40th anniversary of the University of Southern California’s Information Sciences Institute. Thank you to Herb Schorr for inviting me to speak with you today and participate in the day’s events. When he steps down he will leave some very large shoes to fill. When I received Herb’s invitation, I seized upon it as an opportunity to come before you to express the sincere gratitude that my colleagues and I feel for the work and support of ISI. When I think of ICANN and its development, and all we have accomplished, I never forget that we stand upon the shoulders of giants, many of whom contributed to my remarks today. In fact, I owe a special debt of gratitude to Bob Kahn, who has been a mentor to me. I am honored that he took the time to walk through a number of details in the history I have been asked to relate. The organizers asked me to speak about the history of ISI and ICANN. They also invited me to talk a bit about the future of the Internet. In my role as President and CEO of ICANN, I have many speaking engagements that are forward looking. They are opportunities to talk about ICANN’s work and how it will usher in the next phase in the history of the global, unified Internet that many of you have helped to create.
    [Show full text]
  • The Consensus Protocol
    8/5/2020 The Consensus Protocol FEATURE AUGUST 2020 The Consensus Protocol How a radical process, invented to build the ARPANET, spawned history's greatest tool for collaborative work BY STEVE CROCKER UCLA’s Boelter Hall housed one of the four original ARPANET nodes. ach March, July, and November, we are reminded that the Internet is not Equite the mature, stable technology that it seems to be. We rely on the Internet as an essential tool for our economic, social, educational, and political lives. But when the Internet Engineering Task Force meets every four months at an open conference that bounces from continent to continent, more than 1,000 people from around the world gather with change on their minds. Their vision of the global network that all humanity shares is dynamic, evolving, and continuously improving. Their efforts combine with the contributions of myriad others to ensure that the Internet always works but is never done, never complete. The rapid yet orderly evolution of the Internet is all the more remarkable considering the highly unusual way it happens: without a company, a government, or a board of directors in charge. Nothing about digital communications technology suggests that it should be self-organizing or, for that matter, fundamentally reliable. We enjoy an Internet that is both of those at once because multiple generations of network developers have embraced a principle and a https://read.nxtbook.com/ieee/spectrum/spectrum_na_august_2020/the_consensus_protocol.html?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTmpWh h b i i h hi f h l haVpXSmxOMll6TURZeSIsInQiOiIyc280i i l i h … 1/12 8/5/2020 The Consensus Protocol process that have been quite rare in the history of technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Features of the Internet History the Norwegian Contribution to the Development PAAL SPILLING and YNGVAR LUNDH
    Features of the Internet history The Norwegian contribution to the development PAAL SPILLING AND YNGVAR LUNDH This article provides a short historical and personal view on the development of packet-switching, computer communications and Internet technology, from its inception around 1969 until the full- fledged Internet became operational in 1983. In the early 1990s, the internet backbone at that time, the National Science Foundation network – NSFNET, was opened up for commercial purposes. At that time there were already several operators providing commercial services outside the internet. This presentation is based on the authors’ participation during parts of the development and on literature Paal Spilling is studies. This provides a setting in which the Norwegian participation and contribution may be better professor at the understood. Department of informatics, Univ. of Oslo and University 1 Introduction Defense (DOD). It is uncertain when DoD really Graduate Center The concept of computer networking started in the standardized on the entire protocol suite built around at Kjeller early 1960s at the Massachusetts Institute of Technol- TCP/IP, since for several years they also followed the ogy (MIT) with the vision of an “On-line community ISO standards track. of people”. Computers should facilitate communica- tions between people and be a support for human The development of the Internet, as we know it today, decision processes. In 1961 an MIT PhD thesis by went through three phases. The first one was the Leonard Kleinrock introduced some of the earliest research and development phase, sponsored and theoretical results on queuing networks. Around the supervised by ARPA. Research groups that actively same time a series of Rand Corporation papers, contributed to the development process and many mainly authored by Paul Baran, sketched a hypotheti- who explored its potential for resource sharing were cal system for communication while under attack that permitted to connect to and use the network.
    [Show full text]
  • The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet
    The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 02:49:54 UTC Contents Articles History of the Internet 1 Barry Appelman 26 Paul Baran 28 Vint Cerf 33 Danny Cohen (engineer) 41 David D. Clark 44 Steve Crocker 45 Donald Davies 47 Douglas Engelbart 49 Charles M. Herzfeld 56 Internet Engineering Task Force 58 Bob Kahn 61 Peter T. Kirstein 65 Leonard Kleinrock 66 John Klensin 70 J. C. R. Licklider 71 Jon Postel 77 Louis Pouzin 80 Lawrence Roberts (scientist) 81 John Romkey 84 Ivan Sutherland 85 Robert Taylor (computer scientist) 89 Ray Tomlinson 92 Oleg Vishnepolsky 94 Phil Zimmermann 96 References Article Sources and Contributors 99 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 102 Article Licenses License 103 History of the Internet 1 History of the Internet The history of the Internet began with the development of electronic computers in the 1950s. This began with point-to-point communication between mainframe computers and terminals, expanded to point-to-point connections between computers and then early research into packet switching. Packet switched networks such as ARPANET, Mark I at NPL in the UK, CYCLADES, Merit Network, Tymnet, and Telenet, were developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s using a variety of protocols. The ARPANET in particular led to the development of protocols for internetworking, where multiple separate networks could be joined together into a network of networks. In 1982 the Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP) was standardized and the concept of a world-wide network of fully interconnected TCP/IP networks called the Internet was introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • (Jake) Feinler
    Oral History of Elizabeth (Jake) Feinler Interviewed by: Marc Weber Recorded: September 10, 2009 Mountain View, California Editor’s note: Material in [square brackets] has been added by Jake Feinler CHM Reference number: X5378.2009 © 2009 Computer History Museum Oral History of Elizabeth (Jake) Feinler Marc Weber: I’m Marc Weber from the Computer History Museum, and I’m here today, September 10th, 2009, with “Jake” Elizabeth Feinler, who was the director of the Network Information Systems Center at SRI. [This group provided the Network Information Center (NIC) for the Arpanet and the Defense Data Network (DDN), a project for which she was the principal investigator from 1973 until 1991. Earlier she was a member of Douglas Engelbart’s Augmentation Research Center (ARC) at SRI [which [housed] the second computer on the Arpanet. It was on this computer that the NIC resided initially.] Jake is also a volunteer here at the museum. [She has donated an extensive collection of early Internet papers to the museum, and has been working on organizing this collection for some time.] Thank you for joining us. Elizabeth (Jake) Feinler: My pleasure. Weber: I really just wanted to start with where did you grow up and what got you interested in technical things or things related to this. Feinler: [Originally I hoped to pursue a career in advertising design, but could not afford the freshman room and board away from home, so I began attending West Liberty State College (now West Liberty University) close to my home. West Liberty was very small then, and the] art department [wasn’t very good.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Root
    Revisiting the Root David Huberman ICANN’s Office of the CTO | 1 Overview ¤ A Brief History of the Root Server System ¤ Root Server Instances in the RIPE NCC Service Region ¤ Root Server System Governance ¤ Distribution of the Root Zone | 2 A Brief History of the Root Server System | 3 1983 DNS defined | 4 1984 First root server established at University of Southern California’s Information Sciences Institute (USC ISI) | 5 1985 Four root servers: two on each U.S. coast | 6 1987 Seven root servers: SRI – ISI – RPI – U. of Maryland – U.S. Air Force – NASA – U.S. Army | 7 1991 NORDU.NET replaces U.S. Air Force | 8 1993 Nine root servers: InterNIC and ISC are added | 9 1995 Labels changed to [X].ROOT-SERVERS.NET to allow more root servers in a 512-byte priming response | 10 1997 13 Root Servers | 11 Root Server System Today | 12 The Root Server System Today ¤ 13 labels: A through M ¤ 26 IP addresses (13 IPv4, 13 IPv6) ¤ Operated by 12 Root Server Operators ¤ Assigned to 1,100+ instances thanks to “anycast” routing ¤ On 1 December 2018 there were 77.7 billion queries received by the root zone servers (*excludes G-root) | 13 | 14 Root Server Operators A: Verisign G: U.S. DoD B: USC ISI H: U.S. Army Research Lab C: Cogent I: Netnod D: University of Maryland J: Verisign E: NASA - AMES K: RIPE NCC F: ISC L: ICANN M: WIDE | 15 Root Server Operators A: Verisign G: U.S. DoD B: USC ISI H: U.S. Army Research Lab C: Cogent I: Netnod D: University of Maryland J: Verisign E: NASA - AMES K: RIPE NCC F: ISC L: ICANN M: WIDE | 16 Root Server Instances in
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Vision in Radical Technological Innovation A
    THE VALUE OF VISION IN RADICAL TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Tammy L. Carleton September 2010 © 2011 by Tammy Lee Carleton. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/mk388mb2729 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Larry Leifer, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Riitta Katila I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chuck House Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii THE VALUE OF VISION IN RADICAL TECHNOLOGICAL INVENTION ABSTRACT Is a technological vision needed to drive radical or disruptive innovations? Few studies have discussed a possible relationship between the formation of a technological vision and the sustained creation of radical innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1603 Surfnet Bv Category: Informational D
    Network Working Group E. Huizer Request for Comments: 1603 SURFnet bv Category: Informational D. Crocker Silicon Graphics, Inc. March 1994 IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures Status of this Memo This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Abstract The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has responsibility for developing and reviewing specifications intended as Internet Standards. IETF activities are organized into working groups (WGs). This document describes the guidelines and procedures for formation and operation of IETF working groups. It describes the formal relationship between IETF participants WG and the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). The basic duties of IETF participants, including WG Chair and IESG Area Directors are defined. Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................. 2 1.1. IETF approach to standardization........................ 3 1.2. Acknowledgments......................................... 4 2. WORKING GROUP (WG) FORMATION.............................. 5 2.1. Criteria for formation.................................. 5 2.2. Charter................................................. 6 2.3. Charter review & approval............................... 9 2.4. Birds of a feather (BOF)................................ 9 3. WORKING GROUP OPERATION................................... 11 3.1. Session planning........................................ 11 3.2. Session venue..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Long Time Ago, in a Meeting Room Far, Far Away...Or Maybe 17 Years
    A long time ago, in a meeting room far, far away.... ... or maybe 17 years ago, in Houston, Texas... ...work in the IETF began on... DNSSEC For their efforts with DNSSEC, the IETF wishes to thank: Joe Abley - Danny Aerts Alain Aina - Mehmet Akcin Jaap Akerhuis - Mark Andrews Roy Arends - Derek Atkins Rob Austein - Roy Badami Alan Barrett - Doug Barton Rickard Bellgrim - Ray Bellis Steve Bellovin - Dan Bernstein David Blacka - Stéphane Bortzmeyer Eric Brunner-Williams - Len Budney Randy Bush - Bruce Campbell Vint Cerf - K.C. Claffy Alan Clegg - David Conrad Michelle S. Cotton - Olivier Courtay John Crain - Dave Crocker Steve Crocker - Alex Dalitz Joao (Luis Silva) Damas Hugh Daniel - Kim Davies John Dickinson - Vasily Dolmatov Lutz Donnerhacke - Mats Dufberg Francis Dupont - Donald Eastlake Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder Howard Eland - Robert Elz Patrik Fältström - Mark Feldman Ondrej Filip - Martin Fredriksson Alex Gall - James M. Galvin Joe Gersch - Demi Getchko Miek Gieben - John Gilmore Steve Goodbarn - James Gould Michael Graff - Chris Griffiths Olafur Gudmundsson - Gilles Guette Andreas Gustafsson Jun-ichiro Itojun Hagino Staffan Hagnell Phillip Hallam-Baker Ilja Hallberg - Bob Halley Cathy Handley - Wes Hardaker Ted Hardie - Ashley Heineman Jeremy Hitchcock - Bernie Hoeneisen Alfred Hoenes - Paul Hoffman Scott Hollenbeck - Russ Housley Geoff Houston - Walter Howard Bert Hubert - Greg Hudson Christian Huitema - Shumon Huque Johan Ihren - Stephen Jacob Jelte Jansen - Rodney Joffe Simon Josefsson - Daniel Kalchev Andris Kalnozols - Dan
    [Show full text]
  • Steve Crocker Resume
    STEPHEN D. CROCKER 5110 Edgemoor Lane Bethesda, MD 20814 Mobile: (301) 526-4569 [email protected] SUMMARY Over 50 years of experience in the industrial, academic and government environments involving a wide range of computing and network technologies with specialization in networking and security. Strong background in formal methods, including PhD thesis creating a new logic for reasoning about the correct operation of machine language programs and the development of a program verification system to demonstrate the method. Managed numerous innovative research and development efforts benefiting private industry and government interests. Extensive involvement in the development of the Internet, including development of the initial suite of protocols for the Arpanet, the creation of the RFC series of documents, and multiple involvements in the IETF, ISOC and ICANN organizations. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE BBQ Group 2018-present Founder, leader Development of framework and model for expressing possible, desired and existing registration data directory services policies governing collection, labeling and responses to authorized requests. Shinkuro, Inc., Bethesda, MD 2002-present Co-founder, Chief Executive Officer Development of information-sharing, collaboration and related tools for peer-to-peer cooperative work and inter-platform information management. Coordination of deployment of the DNS security protocol, DNSSEC, throughout the Internet. Longitude Systems, Inc., Chantilly, VA 1999-2001 Co-founder, Chief Executive Officer Development and sale of infrastructure tools for ISPs. Overall direction and management of the company including P&L responsibility, funding, marketing, and technical direction. Executive DSL, LLC, Bethesda, MD 1999-2001 Founder, Chief Executive Officer Creation and operation of DSL-based ISP using Covad and Bell Atlantic DSL circuits.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    INTERNET FOR ALL Proceedings of the Third Internet Governance Forum Hyderabad, India 3-6 December 2008 Edited by Don MacLean General Table of Contents Message by Sha Zukang, Under-Secretary-General, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) ……………………..i Introduction……………………………………………………………...……….ii Preface ......................................................................................................... 1 Setting the Scene ....................................................................................... 5 Opening Ceremony, 3 December 2008.....................................................6 Opening Session, 3 December 2008.......................................................16 Part 1 – Reaching the Next Billion.............................................................. 34 Chairman’s Summary of the Main Sessions..........................................35 Panel Discussion on Realizing a Multilingual Internet .........................39 Panel Discussion on Access...................................................................50 Open Dialogue on Reaching the Next Billion ........................................67 Reports of Workshops, Best Practice Forums, Open Forums and Dynamic Coalitions ..................................................................................84 Part 2 – Promoting Cyber-security and Trust ........................................... 117 Chairman’s Summary of Main Sessions ..............................................118 Panel Discussion on Dimensions of Cyber-security
    [Show full text]
  • Sophie Toupin
    Repositorium für die Medienwissenschaft Paolo Bory, Gianluigi Negro, Gabriele Balbi u.a. (Hg.) Computer Network Histories. Hidden Streams from the Internet Past 2019 https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13576 Veröffentlichungsversion / published version Teil eines Periodikums / periodical part Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Bory, Paolo; Negro, Gianluigi; Balbi, Gabriele (Hg.): Computer Network Histories. Hidden Streams from the Internet Past, Jg. 21 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13576. Erstmalig hier erschienen / Initial publication here: https://doi.org/10.33057/chronos.1539 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Creative Commons - This document is made available under a creative commons - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0/ Attribution - Non Commercial - No Derivatives 4.0/ License. For Lizenz zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu dieser Lizenz more information see: finden Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ PAOLO BORY, GIANLUIGI NEGRO, GABRIELE BALBI (EDS.) COMPUTER NETWORK HISTORIES COMPUTER NETWORK HISTORIES HIDDEN STREAMS FROM THE INTERNET PAST Geschichte und Informatik / Histoire et Informatique Computer Network Histories Hidden Streams from the Internet Past EDS. Paolo Bory, Gianluigi Negro, Gabriele Balbi Revue Histoire et Informatique / Zeitschrift Geschichte und Informatik Volume / Band 21 2019 La revue Histoire et Informatique / Geschichte und Informatik est éditée depuis 1990 par l’Association Histoire et Informatique et publiée aux Editions Chronos. La revue édite des recueils d’articles sur les thèmes de recherche de l’association, souvent en relation directe avec des manifestations scientifiques. La coordination des publications et des articles est sous la responsabilité du comité de l’association.
    [Show full text]