DOCSLIB.ORG

Massachusetts Volunteer Coastal Monitoringgeneral Quality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Massachusetts Volunteer Coastal Monitoringgeneral Quality Massachusetts Volunteer Coastal Monitoring General Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) Version 1.1 For Water Quality Monitoring, Wetland Biological Assessments, and Marine Introduced Species Monitoring Prepared by: Jerry Schoen (Massachusetts Water Watch Partnership) Barbara Warren (Salem Sound Coastwatch) Under contract with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management 251 Causeway St., Suite 800 Boston MA 02114 Reviewed by: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management 627 Main Street Worcester, MA 01608 September 2006 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................................... i How to Use This QAPP ........................................................................................................................................................... ii Summary of Requirements for Adopting the General QAPP............................................................................................. iii 1. Title and Approval Page .................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 3. Distribution List ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 4. Project/Task Organization ................................................................................................................................................ 2 5. Problem Definition/Background ....................................................................................................................................... 4 6. Project/Task Description ................................................................................................................................................... 6 7. Measurement Quality Goals ............................................................................................................................................. 9 8. Training Requirements ................................................................................................................................................... 15 9. Documentation and Records ........................................................................................................................................... 16 10. Sampling Process Design ................................................................................................................................................ 17 11. Sampling Method Requirements ................................................................................................................................... 22 12. Sample Handling and Custody Requirements ............................................................................................................. 30 13. Analytical Methods Requirements ................................................................................................................................ 31 14. Quality Control Procedures ........................................................................................................................................... 34 15. Instrument/Equipment Inspection and Testing ........................................................................................................... 37 16. Instrumentation Calibration and Frequency ............................................................................................................... 39 17. Inspection & Acceptance Requirements for Supplies .................................................................................................. 40 18. Data Acquisition Requirements ..................................................................................................................................... 41 19. Data Management ........................................................................................................................................................... 42 20. Assessment and Response Actions ................................................................................................................................. 45 21. Reports ............................................................................................................................................................................. 46 22. Data Review, Validation and Verification Requirements ........................................................................................... 47 23. Validation and Verification Methods ............................................................................................................................ 48 24. Reconciliation with Data Quality Objectives ................................................................................................................ 49 APPENDIX 1: GENERAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN ADOPTION FORM APPENDIX 2. SELECTED REFERENCES TO SPECIFIC FIELD METHODS APPENDIX 3. SELECTED REFERENCES TO SPECIFIC LAB METHODS APPENDIX 4. SELECTED REFERENCES TO QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLANS, SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLANS, WATER QUALITY DATA REPORTS, OTHER USEFUL DOCUMENTS APPENDIX 5. LABORATORIES THAT MAY PROVIDE SERVICES FOR VOLUNTEER MONITORING GROUPS IN COASTAL AREAS APPENDIX 6. MISCELLANEOUS CONTACTS: AGENCIES, TRAINING ORGANIZATIONS, VOLUNTEER MONITORING GROUPS APPENDIX 7. SELECT LIST OF SUPPLIERS OF SAMPLING PROBES, KITS, ETC. APPENDIX 8. MARINE INTRODUCED SPECIES VERIFICATION, HANDLING, AND DISPOSAL PROCEDURES APPENDIX 9. EXAMPLES OF LABELS, FORMS, TRAINING RECORDS, DATA SHEETS TABLES Table 4.1. Project Organization (typical) ............................................................................................ 2 Table 6.1 Anticipated Schedule (typical; variable, dependent on individual programs) ............... 8 Table 7.1. Data Quality Objectives (for common parameters) ....................................................... 10 Table 10.1. Typical Sampling Approaches .......................................................................................... 18 Table 11.1. General Sample Collection Methods ................................................................................ 22 Table 11.2. Typical Field Sampling Considerations ........................................................................... 26 Table 14.1. Typical Quality Control Measures ................................................................................... 35 Table 15.1. Typical Instrument/Equipment Inspection, Testing Procedures................................... 37 Table 16.1. Typical Instrumentation Calibration Procedures ........................................................... 39 Table 17.1. Typical Supplies Inspection, Acceptance Procedures ..................................................... 40 Table 19.1. Data Management, Review, Validation, Verification Process ....................................... 43 Acknowledgements This General QAPP was written by Jerry Schoen (Massachusetts Water Watch Partnership) and Barbara Warren (Salem Sound Coastwatch) under contract with the Office of Coastal Zone Management (CZM). Reviewers included Jay Baker and Todd Callaghan, CZM; and Arthur Screpetis, Richard Chase and Richard Alden, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP). For more information, contact Todd Callaghan, CZM 617-626-1233. i How to Use This QAPP “The Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) outlines the procedures a monitoring project will use to ensure that the samples participants collect and analyze, the data they store and manage, and the reports they write are of high enough quality to meet project needs.” (The Volunteer Monitor’s Guide to Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA 1996). This General QAPP is intended to serve all organizations participating in the Office of Coastal Zone Management’s (CZM) Coastal Monitoring Grants program, and may also serve programs collaborating with other state agencies. It contains baseline requirements to be met for data collection projects, as well as common objectives, parameters, methods and approaches for river, lake, wetland, and coastal chemical and biological monitoring. The General QAPP can be adopted as the project QAPP by any group performing these types of monitoring activities. If not adopted, an individual project QAPP is typically required and the General QAPP may be useful as a template for a project-specific QAPP. Individual groups adopting this General QAPP must follow these steps: 1) Carefully review the General QAPP to ensure that the proposed monitoring program meets the General QAPP’s requirements. 2) Complete the “General QAPP Adoption Form” found in Appendix 1. This form is made up of a series of templates that must be filled out by each monitoring organization. Instructions for completing each element of the General QAPP Adoption form are found in the corresponding numbered chapter of the General QAPP. 3) Submit only the General QAPP Adoption Form for review and approval by CZM and DEP (see Chapter 1 for more information). Note: Groups that submit the General QAPP Adoption Form will not be
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Multigene Phylogenetic Analysis of Terebelliform Annelids
    Zhong et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011, 11:369 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/369 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Detecting the symplesiomorphy trap: a multigene phylogenetic analysis of terebelliform annelids Min Zhong1, Benjamin Hansen2, Maximilian Nesnidal2, Anja Golombek2, Kenneth M Halanych1 and Torsten H Struck2* Abstract Background: For phylogenetic reconstructions, conflict in signal is a potential problem for tree reconstruction. For instance, molecular data from different cellular components, such as the mitochondrion and nucleus, may be inconsistent with each other. Mammalian studies provide one such case of conflict where mitochondrial data, which display compositional biases, support the Marsupionta hypothesis, but nuclear data confirm the Theria hypothesis. Most observations of compositional biases in tree reconstruction have focused on lineages with different composition than the majority of the lineages under analysis. However in some situations, the position of taxa that lack compositional bias may be influenced rather than the position of taxa that possess compositional bias. This situation is due to apparent symplesiomorphic characters and known as “the symplesiomorphy trap”. Results: Herein, we report an example of the sympleisomorphy trap and how to detect it. Worms within Terebelliformia (sensu Rouse & Pleijel 2001) are mainly tube-dwelling annelids comprising five ‘families’: Alvinellidae, Ampharetidae, Terebellidae, Trichobranchidae and Pectinariidae. Using mitochondrial genomic data, as well as data from the nuclear 18S, 28S rDNA and elongation factor-1a genes, we revealed incongruence between mitochondrial and nuclear data regarding the placement of Trichobranchidae. Mitochondrial data favored a sister relationship between Terebellidae and Trichobranchidae, but nuclear data placed Trichobranchidae as sister to an Ampharetidae/Alvinellidae clade.
    [Show full text]
  • Annelida: Polychaeta) in a Marine Cave of the Ionian Sea (Italy, Central Mediterranean)
    J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. (2006), 86,1373^1380 doi: 10.1017/S0025315406014408 Printed in the United Kingdom Recruitment of Serpuloidea (Annelida: Polychaeta) in a marine cave of the Ionian Sea (Italy, central Mediterranean) P O Francesco Denitto* and Margherita Licciano *Laboratorio di Zoogeogra¢a e Faunistica, DiSTeBA, Universita' di Lecce, Via Prov.le Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy. O Laboratorio di Zoologia e Simbiosi, DiSTeBA, Universita' di Lecce, Via Prov.le Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy. P Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] This paper is the ¢rst attempt to study the recruitment of Serpuloideans in a Mediterranean marine cave through the use of arti¢cial substrates placed in three di¡erent positions, from the entrance to the interior of the cave. This study provides qualitative and quantitative data concerning Serpuloidea recruitment on panels removed successively after one, three, six and 12 months of permanence in the cave. A homogeneous distribution of juveniles Spirorbidae throughout the cave axis had already been detected after one month of panel immersion. Spirorbids were recorded also on panels removed after three months as well as serpulids, which began to be detected during this sampling time, even though represented by just one species. A signi¢cantly di¡erent pattern of distribution throughout the cave axis was observed after only six months, while other serpulids were detected for the ¢rst time. The pattern of species distribution seemed to re£ect the biotic and environmental conditions of the cave. The highest serpuloidean species abundance and diversity was found on panels placed in the intermediate position within the cave.
    [Show full text]
  • Polychaeta: Serpulidae) from Southeastern Australia
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Knight-Jones, E. W., P. Knight-Jones and L. C. Llewellyn, 1974. Spirorbinae (Polychaeta: Serpulidae) from southeastern Australia. Notes on their taxonomy, ecology, and distribution. Records of the Australian Museum 29(3): 106–151. [1 May 1974]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.29.1974.230 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia o ~------------------~o 25-20 and above 23-17 19- 14 17- 13 ood below 20 20 40 40 ,-- 50 50 Figure I.-Top left, collecting sites near Adelaide; top right, ditto near Sydney; bottom, collecting locations inset, showing also currents of warm, cool (interrupted lines) and cold water (dotted lines). A second smaller arrow-head indicates that the current occasionally reverses. Coastal water types and the mean position of the subtropical convergence (see p. 147) modified from Knox (1963), with mean summer (February) and winter (August) temperatures in degreesC. SPIRORBINAE (POLYCHAETA: SERPULIDAE) FROM SOUTHEASTERN AUSTRALIA. Notes on their Taxonomy, Ecology, and Distribution By E. W. KNIGHT-jONES and PHYLLIS KNIGHT-jONES University College of Swansea, U.K. and L. C. LLEWELLYN, New South Wales State Fisheries, Sydney, Australia Figures 1-14 Manuscript received, 1st September, 1972 SUMMARY Fifteen species belonging to seven genera are described, with pictorial and dichotomous keys to identification and notes on their distribution in other regions. All occur on or adjoining the shore, or on seaweeds cast ashore.
    [Show full text]
  • Solitary Entoprocts Living on Bryozoans - Commensals, Mutualists Or Parasites?
    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 440 (2013) 15–21 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe Solitary entoprocts living on bryozoans - Commensals, mutualists or parasites? Yuta Tamberg ⁎, Natalia Shunatova, Eugeniy Yakovis Department of Invertebrate Zoology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaja nab. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation article info abstract Article history: To assess the effects of interspecific interactions on community structure it is necessary to identify their sign. Received 24 December 2011 Interference in sessile benthic suspension-feeders is mediated by space and food. In the White Sea solitary Received in revised form 3 November 2012 entoproct Loxosomella nordgaardi almost restrictively inhabits the colonies of several bryozoans, including Accepted 7 November 2012 Tegella armifera. Since both entoprocts and their hosts are suspension-feeders, this strong spatial association Available online xxxx suggests feeding interference of an unknown sign. We mapped the colonies of T. armifera inhabited by entoprocts and examined stomachs of both species for Keywords: Bryozoa diatom shells. Distribution of L. nordgaardi was positively correlated with distribution of fully developed Commensalism and actively feeding polypides of T. armifera, i.e. areas of strong colony-wide currents. We compared diatom Entoprocta shells found in their stomachs and observed a diet overlap, especially in the size classes b15 μm. Size spectra Epibiosis of the diatom shells consumed by T. armifera and average number of diatom shells per gut were not affected Interactions by the presence of L. nordgaardi. According to these results, L. nordgaardi is a commensal of T.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Marine Alien and Invasive Species
    Table 1: The list of 96 marine alien and invasive species recorded along the coastline of South Africa. Phylum Class Taxon Status Common name Natural Range ANNELIDA Polychaeta Alitta succinea Invasive pile worm or clam worm Atlantic coast ANNELIDA Polychaeta Boccardia proboscidea Invasive Shell worm Northern Pacific ANNELIDA Polychaeta Dodecaceria fewkesi Alien Black coral worm Pacific Northern America ANNELIDA Polychaeta Ficopomatus enigmaticus Invasive Estuarine tubeworm Australia ANNELIDA Polychaeta Janua pagenstecheri Alien N/A Europe ANNELIDA Polychaeta Neodexiospira brasiliensis Invasive A tubeworm West Indies, Brazil ANNELIDA Polychaeta Polydora websteri Alien oyster mudworm N/A ANNELIDA Polychaeta Polydora hoplura Invasive Mud worm Europe, Mediterranean ANNELIDA Polychaeta Simplaria pseudomilitaris Alien N/A Europe BRACHIOPODA Lingulata Discinisca tenuis Invasive Disc lamp shell Namibian Coast BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Virididentula dentata Invasive Blue dentate moss animal Indo-Pacific BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Bugulina flabellata Invasive N/A N/A BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Bugula neritina Invasive Purple dentate mos animal N/A BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Conopeum seurati Invasive N/A Europe BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Cryptosula pallasiana Invasive N/A Europe BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Watersipora subtorquata Invasive Red-rust bryozoan Caribbean CHLOROPHYTA Ulvophyceae Cladophora prolifera Invasive N/A N/A CHLOROPHYTA Ulvophyceae Codium fragile Invasive green sea fingers Korea CHORDATA Actinopterygii Cyprinus carpio Invasive Common carp Asia CHORDATA Ascidiacea
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan
    Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan Volume 2 Baseline Assessment and Science Framework December 2009 Introduction Volume 2 of the Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan focuses on the data and scientific aspects of the plan and its implementation. It includes these two separate documents: • Baseline Assessment of the Massachusetts Ocean Planning Area - This Oceans Act-mandated product includes information cataloging the current state of knowledge regarding human uses, natural resources, and other ecosystem factors in Massachusetts ocean waters. • Science Framework - This document provides a blueprint for ocean management- related science and research needs in Massachusetts, including priorities for the next five years. i Baseline Assessment of the Massachusetts Ocean Management Planning Area Acknowledgements The authors thank Emily Chambliss and Dan Sampson for their help in preparing Geographic Information System (GIS) data for presentation in the figures. We also thank Anne Donovan and Arden Miller, who helped with the editing and layout of this document. Special thanks go to Walter Barnhardt, Ed Bell, Michael Bothner, Erin Burke, Tay Evans, Deb Hadden, Dave Janik, Matt Liebman, Victor Mastone, Adrienne Pappal, Mark Rousseau, Tom Shields, Jan Smith, Page Valentine, John Weber, and Brad Wellock, who helped us write specific sections of this assessment. We are grateful to Wendy Leo, Peter Ralston, and Andrea Rex of the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority for data and assistance writing the water quality subchapter. Robert Buchsbaum, Becky Harris, Simon Perkins, and Wayne Petersen from Massachusetts Audubon provided expert advice on the avifauna subchapter. Kevin Brander, David Burns, and Kathleen Keohane from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and Robin Pearlman from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Fauna of New Zealand : Spirorbinae (Polychaeta : Serpulidae)
    ISSN 0083-7903, 68 (Print) ISSN 2538-1016; 68 (Online) The Marine Fauna of New Zealand : Spirorbinae (Polychaeta : Serpulidae) by PETER J. VINE ANOGlf -1,. �" ii 'i ,;.1, J . --=--� • ��b, S�• 1 • New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir No. 68 1977 The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Spirorbinae (Polychaeta: Serpulidae) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Frontispiece Spirorbinae on a piece of alga washed up on the New Zealand seashore. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ NEW ZEALAND DEPARTMENT OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Spirorbinae (Polychaeta: Serpulidae) by PETER J. VINE Department of Zoology, University College, Singleton Park, Swansea, Wales, UK and School of Biological Sciences, James Cook University of North Queensland, Townsville, Australia PERMANENT ADDRESS "Coe! na Mara", Faul, c/- Dr Casey, Clifden, County Galway, Ireland New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir No. 68 1977 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Citation according to World list of Scientific Periodicals (4th edition: Mem. N.Z. oceanogr. Inst. 68 ISSN 0083-7903 Received for publication at NZOI January 1973 Edited by T. K. Crosby, Science InformationDivision, DSIR and R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Functional Approach to Resolving the Biogeocomplexity of Two Extreme Environments Haydn Rubelmann III University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 11-12-2014 A Functional Approach to Resolving the Biogeocomplexity of Two Extreme Environments Haydn Rubelmann III University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Microbiology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Rubelmann, Haydn III, "A Functional Approach to Resolving the Biogeocomplexity of Two Extreme Environments" (2014). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5432 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Functional Approach to Resolving the Biogeocomplexity of Two Extreme Environments by Haydn Rubelmann III A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology and Molecular Biology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: James R. Garey, Ph.D. Randy Larsen, Ph.D. Kathleen Scott, Ph.D. David Merkler, Ph.D. Date of Approval: November 12, 2014 Keywords: environmental microbiology, extremophiles, shallow-water hydrothermal vents, anoxic marine pits Copyright © 2014, Haydn Rubelmann III DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this dissertation to three of my personal champions: my grandfather, Haydn Rubelmann Sr. (1929 - 2004), who encouraged me to pursue an academic career; my stepfather, Dale Jones (1954 - 2008), who was the best father anyone could ever hope for, and my husband, Eduardo Godoy, who suffered through not only 8 years of my doctoral tenure, but a grueling civil liberty injustice that almost wedged the Caribbean Sea between us.
    [Show full text]
  • Annelida, Serpulidae
    Graellsia, 72(2): e053 julio-diciembre 2016 ISSN-L: 0367-5041 http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/graellsia.2016.v72.120 SERPÚLIDOS (ANNELIDA, SERPULIDAE) COLECTADOS EN LA CAMPAÑA OCEANOGRÁFICA “FAUNA II” Y CATÁLOGO ACTUALIZADO DE ESPECIES ÍBERO-BALEARES DE LA FAMILIA SERPULIDAE Jesús Alcázar* & Guillermo San Martín Departamento de Biología (Zoología), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, calle Darwin, 2, Canto Blanco, 28049 Madrid, España. *Dirección para la correspondencia: [email protected] RESUMEN Se presentan los resultados de la identificación del material de la familia Serpulidae (Polychaeta) recolectado en la campaña oceanográfica Fauna II, así como la revisión de citas de presencia íbero-balear desde el catálogo de poliquetos más reciente (Ariño, 1987). Se identificaron 16 especies pertenecientes a 10 géneros, además de la primera cita íbero-balear de una quimera bioperculada (Ten Hove & Ben-Eliahu, 2005) de la especie Hydroides norvegicus Gunnerus, 1768. En cuanto a la revisión del catálogo se mencionan 65 especies, actuali- zando el nombre de 20 de ellas y añadiendo cinco especies ausentes en el catálogo de Ariño (1987): Hydroides stoichadon Zibrowius, 1971, Laeospira corallinae (de Silva & Knight-Jones, 1962), Serpula cavernicola Fassari & Mòllica, 1991, Spirobranchus lima (Grube, 1862) y Spirorbis inornatus L’Hardy & Quièvreux, 1962. Se cita por primera vez Vermiliopsis monodiscus Zibrowius, 1968 en el Atlántico ibérico y a partir de la bibliografía consultada, se muestra la expansión en la distribución íbero-balear
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan
    CONNECTICUT AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Connecticut Aquatic Nuisance Species Working Group TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 3 Acknowledgements 5 Executive Summary 6 1. INTRODUCTION 10 1.1. Scope of the ANS Problem in Connecticut 10 1.2. Relationship with other ANS Plans 10 1.3. The Development of the CT ANS Plan (Process and Participants) 11 1.3.1. The CT ANS Sub-Committees 11 1.3.2. Scientific Review Process 12 1.3.3. Public Review Process 12 1.3.4. Agency Review Process 12 2. PROBLEM DEFINITION AND RANKING 13 2.1. History and Biogeography of ANS in CT 13 2.2. Current and Potential Impacts of ANS in CT 15 2.2.1. Economic Impacts 16 2.2.2. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Impacts 19 2.3. Priority Aquatic Nuisance Species 19 2.3.1. Established ANS Priority Species or Species Groups 21 2.3.2. Potentially Threatening ANS Priority Species or Species Groups 23 2.4. Priority Vectors 23 2.5. Priorities for Action 23 3. EXISTING AUTHORITIES AND PROGRAMS 30 3.1. International Authorities and Programs 30 3.2. Federal Authorities and Programs 31 3.3. Regional Authorities and Programs 37 3.4. State Authorities and Programs 39 3.5. Local Authorities and Programs 45 4. GOALS 47 3 5. OBJECTIVES, STRATEGIES, AND ACTIONS 48 6. IMPLEMENTATION TABLE 72 7. PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVALUATION 80 Glossary* 81 Appendix A. Listings of Known Non-Native ANS and Potential ANS in Connecticut 83 Appendix B. Descriptions of Species Identified as ANS or Potential ANS 93 Appendix C.
    [Show full text]
  • Description and Phylogenetic Position of the First Sand-Dwelling Entoproct from the Western Coast of North America: Loxosomella Vancouverensis Sp
    This article was downloaded by: [University of Arizona], [Rebecca Rundell] On: 09 February 2012, At: 19:53 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Marine Biology Research Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/smar20 Description and phylogenetic position of the first sand-dwelling entoproct from the western coast of North America: Loxosomella vancouverensis sp. nov. Rebecca J. Rundell a & Brian S. Leander a a Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Program in Integrated Microbial Diversity, Vancouver, BC, Canada Available online: 09 Feb 2012 To cite this article: Rebecca J. Rundell & Brian S. Leander (2012): Description and phylogenetic position of the first sand-dwelling entoproct from the western coast of North America: Loxosomella vancouverensis sp. nov. , Marine Biology Research, 8:3, 284-291 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2011.619545 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Phylogeny and the Ancestry of Bilaterians: Inferences from Morphology and 18S Rdna Gene Sequences
    EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT 3:3, 170–205 (2001) Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences Kevin J. Peterson and Douglas J. Eernisse* Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, USA; and *Department of Biological Science, California State University, Fullerton CA 92834-6850, USA *Author for correspondence (email: [email protected]) SUMMARY Insight into the origin and early evolution of the and protostomes, with ctenophores the bilaterian sister- animal phyla requires an understanding of how animal group, whereas 18S rDNA suggests that the root is within the groups are related to one another. Thus, we set out to explore Lophotrochozoa with acoel flatworms and gnathostomulids animal phylogeny by analyzing with maximum parsimony 138 as basal bilaterians, and with cnidarians the bilaterian sister- morphological characters from 40 metazoan groups, and 304 group. We suggest that this basal position of acoels and gna- 18S rDNA sequences, both separately and together. Both thostomulids is artifactal because for 1000 replicate phyloge- types of data agree that arthropods are not closely related to netic analyses with one random sequence as outgroup, the annelids: the former group with nematodes and other molting majority root with an acoel flatworm or gnathostomulid as the animals (Ecdysozoa), and the latter group with molluscs and basal ingroup lineage. When these problematic taxa are elim- other taxa with spiral cleavage. Furthermore, neither brachi- inated from the matrix, the combined analysis suggests that opods nor chaetognaths group with deuterostomes; brachiopods the root lies between the deuterostomes and protostomes, are allied with the molluscs and annelids (Lophotrochozoa), and Ctenophora is the bilaterian sister-group.
    [Show full text]