DOCSLIB.ORG

Advocate of Indexation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Advocate of Indexation THE AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTI­ EXECUTIVE TUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH, COMMITTEE established in 1943, is a publicly sup­ Herman J. Schmidt ported, nonpartisan research and edu­ Chairman of the Board cational organization. Its purpose is William J. Baroody to assist policy makers, scholars, busi­ President nessmen, the press and the public by providing objective analysis of nation­ William G. McClintock Treasurer al and international issues. Views ex­ pressed in the institute's publications Richard J. Farrell are those of the authors and do not Dean Fite necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers or trustees of AEI. SENIOR STAFF Thomas F. Johnson ADVISORY BOARD Director of Research Paul W. McCracken, Chairman, Ed­ Joseph G. Butts mund Ezra Day University Professor Director of Legislative of Business Administration, Univer­ Analysis sity of Michigan Anne Brunsdale R. H. Coase, Professor of Economics, Director of Publications University of Chicago Robert J. Pranger Director of Foreign and Milton Friedman, Paul S. Russell Dis­ Defense Policy Studies tinguished Service Professor of Eco­ nomics, University of Chicago Robert B. Helms Director of Health Policy Gottfried Haberler, Resident Scholar, Studies American Enterprise Institute for Earl H. Voss Public Policy Research Assistant to the President for Special Programs C. Lowell Harriss, Professor of Eco­ nomics, Columbia University Gary L. Jones Assistant to the President for Administration George Lenczowski, Professor of Po­ litical Science, University of Califor­ nia, Berkeley Robert A. Nisbet, Professor of Sociol­ ogy and History, University of Ari­ zona James A. Robinson, President, Mac­ alester College INDEXING AND INFlATION • Eileen Shanahan,• Moderator Milton Friedman Charis Walker Robert J. Gordon William Fellner An AEI Round Table held on 17 July 1974 at the American EnterpriseInstitute forPublic Policy Research Washington, D.C. THIS PAMPHLET CONTAINS THE PROCEEDINGS OF ONE OF A SERiES OF AEI ROUND TABLE DISCUSSIONS. THE ROUND TABLE OFFERS A MEDIUM FOR INFORMAL EXCHANGES OF IDEAS ON CURRENT POLICY PROBLEMS OF NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL IMPORT. AS PART OF AEI'S PROGRAM OF PROVIDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE PRESENTATION OF COMPETING VIEWS, IT SERVES TO ENHANCE THE PROSPECT THAT DECISIONS WITHIN OUR DEMOCRACY WILL BE BASED ON A MORE INFORMED PUBLIC OPINION. AEI ROUND TABLES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE ON AUDIO AND COLOR-VIDEO CASSETTES. © 1974 BY AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH, WASHINGTON, D.C. PERMISSION TO QUOTE FROM OR REPRODUCE MATERIALS IN THIS PUBLICATION IS GRANTED WHEN DUE ACKNOWLEDGMENT IS MADE. SECOND PRINTING, JUNE 1975 ISBN 0-8447-2049-6 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NO. L.C. 74-19771 PRINTED IN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ILEEN SHANAHAN, The New York Times: Good E evening. Tonight we're going to discuss a subject that is so new that there isn't even any complete agreement on its name. It's sometimes called indexing or indexation, sometimes called monetary correction, and many people may be familiar with it by an earlier name, escalation. We all remember, I think, when the first escalation clause, in modern times at least, was written into a labor contract right after World War II-the contract of the United Auto Workers. It was based on the idea that, if prices were going up, wages ought to go up in some direct relation. Now a proposal has been made-or rather revived, I am told-that indexing be made more general than that. We have here to talk about it four distinguished economists, one of whom is currently the most promi­ nent advocate of the adoption of escalation, or indexa­ tion, in a certain form. I think you will find there is dis­ agreement not only about the overall wisdom of the pro­ posed policy, but also over how widely it should be ap­ plied, what should be left in, what should be left out. Because the subject is so new, we're going to ask each of the panelists for a three-minute opening state­ ment to define what it is we're talking about, where we agree and disagree. Our first speaker is Professor Milton Friedman of the University of Chicago, who is perhaps at the moment the most noted advocate of indexation. 1 MILTON FRIEDMAN: Indexation may appear new in the United States because we have been so fortunate as to have relatively stable prices over the past century and a half, except during wartime. But it is a very old idea that goes back centuries and that has arisen intb promi­ nence whenever a country has gone through periods of rapid inflation or rapid deflation. Indexation is a plan whereby contracts which have a time duration are expressed in dollars adjusted for the rate of inflation, instead of being expressed simply in dollars. The escalator clauses in wage contracts are of this form. In these cases, a wage agreement is made for, say, three years with the proviso that if prices rise dur­ ing that period wages will be adjusted accordingly. In the same way, an adjustment for inflation can be made in contracts for mortgages on houses and for loans. Indexing is badly needed in the United States to ad­ just the income tax because, under current circumstances, rises in prices push people up into higher income brackets, so that their tax load is heavier than was intended by Congress. In fact, because of such automatic effects of price inflation, the United States government last year realized something over $25 billion in the form of tax revenues which were never legislated by Congress on anybody. I am strongly in favor of indexation for two rea­ sons: First, I would like to see legislated indexing of governmental contracts in order to make the government honest, in order to eliminate taxation without representa­ tion, in order to make it possible to sell government bonds without conductiing a bucket-shop operation. Second, I am in favor of voluntary indexing on the part of business enterprises and people engaging in contracts over a pe­ riod of time in order to ease the withdrawal pains from our present high level of inflation. Indexing per se will not, in my opinion, do anything to reduce inflation. But what it will do will be to make it easier to terminate our inflation. It will make it easier by reducing the incentive for government to inflate and by making the withdrawal pains from inflation less severe. 2 MS. SHANAHAN: Now, an opponent of the whole idea, Dr. Charls Walker, former deputy secretary of the Treas­ ury and now an economic consultant in Washington. CHARLS WALKER: Thank you very much, Miss Shana­ han. I disagree very much with my friend, Dr. Friedman. I do not think that he has the right answer for the big problem confronting us at this particular time. I'm very grateful to him for his article on indexing in the current [July] issue of Fortune magazine. It re­ minded me of that old statement, "Oh, that my enemy would write a book"-because his arguments for index­ ing gave me some thoughts as to how I might respond. Professor Friedman's first sentence in that article reads as follows: "The real obstacles to ending inflation are political, not economic." I strongly agree, and I think that many of the things he says in that article and has said in, the last few minutes and will say tonight make a great deal of economic sense. But since he has said that this is basically a political problem, it seems to me it has to be approached in po­ litical terms. I think that indexing is not only politically unnecessary but can be politically damaging through the economic process for a variety of reasons. The question that Professor Friedman raised about the government being honest or dishonest in its offering of fixed term securities to the public-I'm tempted to say, rubs me the wrong way-does raise questions in my mind. We have a representative government-a demo­ cratic system of government-and when we talk about whether the government is straightforward or not, we're really talking about whether the people of this country are exercising their role as citizens and voters in the proper ways. So my fundamental points tonight will be on the political side, although I will make a point or two on the economic side as the argument goes along. MS. SHANAHAN: Our next speaker is a supporter of the 3 idea of indexing, Dr. Robert Gordon of Northwestern University. ROBERT J. GORDON: I think it's wise to set the dis­ cussion in context by going back to the very beginning and asking why it is at the present time that most mem­ bers of the press and most everyday people, in reacting to their own life, find inflation so difficult to live with. One may wonder why inflation is considered to be so bad, because, if you think about it, what is the dif­ ference between one state of the world with constant wages and constant prices and another state of the world with all wages going up 5 percent a year and all prices going up 5 percent a year? Now, if we contrast this ideal situation with what's actually happened in the United States in the last two years, we get an idea what the argument is all about. The problem is, of course, that in the United States we have not been experiencing this ideal escalation of prices and wages moving together. Representatives of various groups in society could step up right now and tell us they have not gained under the inflation. Although the rise in prices has been ac­ celerating particularly due to the increase in food costs and oil prices, we have not had any acceleration in the average wage increase until very recently.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gottfried Haberler: a Century Appreciation*
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Gottfried Haberler: A Century Appreciation* Richard M. Ebeling* _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ During the first week of July in 1936, an inter- work. Indeed, "Haberler-like methods" became a national conference on the "Problems of Economic catch phrase of the entire conference.1 Change" was held in Annecy, France. It brought Haberler had spent two years carefully together such notable economists as Ludwig von researching and consulting on the various Mises, Wilhelm Ropke, Oskar Morgenstern, Bertil competing theories
    [Show full text]
  • “Exceptional and Unimportant”? Externalities, Competitive Equilibrium, and the Myth of a Pigovian Tradition
    “Exceptional and Unimportant”? Externalities, Competitive Equilibrium, and the Myth of a Pigovian Tradition Steven G. Medema* Version 2.3 January 2019 Forthcoming, History of Political Economy * University Distinguished Professor of Economics, University of Colorado Denver. Email: [email protected]. The author has benefitted greatly from comments on earlier drafts of this paper provided by Roger Backhouse, Nathalie Berta, Ross Emmett, Kenji Fujii, Kerry Krutilla, Alain Marciano, Norikazu Takami, participants in the CHOPE workshop at Duke University, the editor, and two anonymous referees. The financial support provided by the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Earhart Foundation, the Institute for New Economic Thinking, and the University of Colorado Denver is gratefully acknowledged. “Exceptional and Unimportant”? Externalities, Competitive Equilibrium, and the Myth of a Pigovian Tradition I. Introduction Economists typically locate the origins of the theory of externalities in A.C. Pigou’s The Economics of Welfare (1920), where Pigou suggested that activities which generate uncompensated benefits or costs—e.g., pollution, lighthouses, scientific research— represent instances of market failure requiring government corrective action.1 According to this history, Pigou’s effort gave rise to an unbroken Pigovian tradition in externality theory that continues to exert a substantial presence in the literature to this day, even with the stiff criticisms of it laid down by Ronald Coase (1960) and others beginning in the 1960s.2 This paper challenges that view. It demonstrates that, in the aftermath of the publication of The Economics of Welfare, economists paid almost no attention to externalities. On the rare occasions when externalities were mentioned, it was in the context of whether a competitive equilibrium could produce an efficient allocation of resources and to note that externalities were an impediment to the attainment of the optimum.
    [Show full text]
  • 03 Black 1749.Indd
    BOB BLACK Robert Denis Collison Black 1922–2008 Early years ROBERT DENIS COLLISON BLACK, Bob Black to an international circle of friends, was born 11 June 1922 at Morehampton Terrace, Dublin.1 His father, William Robert Black, was company secretary for a small group of companies in the grain trade.2 His mother was Rosa Anna Mary, née Reid. Dublin at the time of Black’s birth was experiencing considerable disturbance, though he rarely alluded to this.3 Black was educated at Sandford Park School, Dublin. However he became disenchanted with the school4 and contrived, astonishingly, to enter Trinity College, Dublin at the age of 15. Even more remarkably, he seems to have managed perfectly well as a 15-year old amongst much older students. He managed to complete two undergraduate degree courses. He enrolled for a commerce degree, but Trinity at that time required those 1 The family moved to Waltham Terrace when Black was fi ve. Bob Black gave a long and detailed interview to Antoin Murphy and Renee Prendergast which was published in his Festschrift. See A. Murphy and R. Prendergast (eds.), Contributions to the History of Economic Thought. Essays in Honour of R. D. C. Black (London, 2000), p. 3. 2 Black gave another interview which is recorded in K. Tribe, Economic Careers. Economics and Economists in Britain 1930–1970 (London, 1997). See Tribe, p. 96, for the occupation of Black’s father. The latter was a considerable expert in his fi eld. I can remember Black telling me how he could sniff a handful of grain and detect its origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Nine Lives of Neoliberalism
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) Book — Published Version Nine Lives of Neoliberalism Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) (2020) : Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, ISBN 978-1-78873-255-0, Verso, London, New York, NY, https://www.versobooks.com/books/3075-nine-lives-of-neoliberalism This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/215796 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality of What Among Whom?: Rival Conceptions of Distribution In
    1 2 3 4 5 INEQUALITY OF WHAT AMONG 6 7 WHOM?: RIVAL CONCEPTIONS OF 8 9 DISTRIBUTION IN THE 20TH 10 ଝ 11 CENTURY 12 13 14 Robert S. Goldfarb and Thomas C. Leonard 15 16 17 ABSTRACT 18 19 Distribution concerns who gets what. But does “who” refer to the 20 personal distribution of income among individuals or the functional 21 distribution of income among suppliers of productive factors? For nearly 150 22 years,Anglophone distribution theory followed the Ricardian emphasis on 23 functional distribution – the income shares of labor,land,and capital. Only 24 beginning in the 1960s,and consolidated by a research outpouring in the 25 early 1970s,does mainstream economics turn to the personal conception 26 of distribution. This essay documents Anglophone (primarily American) 27 economics’ move from functional to personal distribution,and tries to 28 illuminate something of its causes and timing. 29 30 ଝ The authors have benefitted from conversations with and/or suggestions from Steve Baldwin, 31 Rachel Boaz, Bryan Boulier, Barry Chiswick, Carmel Chiswick, Joseph Cordes, Edwin Dean, David 32 Greenberg, Daniel Hamermesh, Pam Labadie, David Lindauer, Ben Okner, Don Parsons, David 33 Pritchett, Malcolm Rutherford and Stephen Smith in the course of writing this paper. We also benefitted 34 from comments during presentations at the Eastern Economic Association meetings March 2002, the 35 History of Economics Society meetings July 2003 and during seminar presentations at George Mason University, George Washington University, and the University of Maryland Baltimore County. 36 37 A Research Annual 38 Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, Volume 23-A, 79–123 Copyright © 2005 by Elsevier Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham Revisiting Samuelson's Foundations of Economic Analysis
    University of Birmingham Revisiting Samuelson's Foundations of Economic Analysis Backhouse, Roger DOI: 10.1257/jel.53.2.326 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Backhouse, R 2015, 'Revisiting Samuelson's Foundations of Economic Analysis' Journal of Economic Literature, vol 53, no. 2, pp. 326-350. DOI: 10.1257/jel.53.2.326 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights When referring to this publication, please cite the published version. Copyright and associated moral rights for publications accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners. It is a condition of accessing this publication that users abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • You may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. • Users may download and print one copy of the publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. • If a Creative Commons licence is associated with this publication, please consult the terms and conditions cited therein. • Unless otherwise stated, you may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Take down policy If you believe that this document infringes copyright please contact [email protected] providing details and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate. Download date: 16. May. 2017 Journal of Economic Literature 2015, 53(2), 326–350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.53.2.326 Revisiting Samuelson’s Foundations of Economic Analysis† Roger E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideological Profiles of the Economics Laureates · Econ Journal Watch
    Discuss this article at Journaltalk: http://journaltalk.net/articles/5811 ECON JOURNAL WATCH 10(3) September 2013: 255-682 Ideological Profiles of the Economics Laureates LINK TO ABSTRACT This document contains ideological profiles of the 71 Nobel laureates in economics, 1969–2012. It is the chief part of the project called “Ideological Migration of the Economics Laureates,” presented in the September 2013 issue of Econ Journal Watch. A formal table of contents for this document begins on the next page. The document can also be navigated by clicking on a laureate’s name in the table below to jump to his or her profile (and at the bottom of every page there is a link back to this navigation table). Navigation Table Akerlof Allais Arrow Aumann Becker Buchanan Coase Debreu Diamond Engle Fogel Friedman Frisch Granger Haavelmo Harsanyi Hayek Heckman Hicks Hurwicz Kahneman Kantorovich Klein Koopmans Krugman Kuznets Kydland Leontief Lewis Lucas Markowitz Maskin McFadden Meade Merton Miller Mirrlees Modigliani Mortensen Mundell Myerson Myrdal Nash North Ohlin Ostrom Phelps Pissarides Prescott Roth Samuelson Sargent Schelling Scholes Schultz Selten Sen Shapley Sharpe Simon Sims Smith Solow Spence Stigler Stiglitz Stone Tinbergen Tobin Vickrey Williamson jump to navigation table 255 VOLUME 10, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2013 ECON JOURNAL WATCH George A. Akerlof by Daniel B. Klein, Ryan Daza, and Hannah Mead 258-264 Maurice Allais by Daniel B. Klein, Ryan Daza, and Hannah Mead 264-267 Kenneth J. Arrow by Daniel B. Klein 268-281 Robert J. Aumann by Daniel B. Klein, Ryan Daza, and Hannah Mead 281-284 Gary S. Becker by Daniel B.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction of Inflation by Slack Demand Phillip Cagan
    The Reduction of Inflation by Slack Demand Phillip Cagan Summary The persistence of inflation in the past decade has undermined confi­ dence in our capability of reducing it. To many it appears intractable. While the inflation rate has declined in periods of business recession, it has revived and intensified in the subsequent periods of business ex­ pansion. The dissatisfaction with traditional monetary and fiscal meas­ ures has brought forth schemes to restrain price increases directly by taxes or subsidies, though these hold no more promise of being effective than have direct controls on prices or incomes policies in the past. The dissatisfaction reflects in part the failure of inflation, in a busi­ ness recovery such as 1975-1977, to continue to decline while excess unemployment is reduced. The belief that inflation should decline is based on the presumption that it always tends to decline so long as re­ sources are not fully employed and markets exhibit slack. But that is not an accurate view of historical price behavior. The inflation rate has always fluctuated over the business cycle, falling during business con­ tractions and rising during expansions, invariably beginning to rise early in business recoveries long before economic slack gives way to full-employment output, for a reduction in the inflation rate that out­ lasts the business cycle, the rate will be lower in corresponding stages of successive business cycles. For such a reduction in inflation, policy must reduce the expected rate of inflation. This rate reflects the anticipated long-run equilibrium trend of prices and underlies explicit and implicit contracts for future payments and the setting of wages and prices gen- I am indebted to William Fellner, John Taylor, and the authors of this volume for helpful comments and to Fred Kittler for computer assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cowles Commission and Foundation for Research in Economics
    THE COWLES COMMISSION AND FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS By Robert W. Dimand November 2019 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 2207 COWLES FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS YALE UNIVERSITY Box 208281 New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8281 http://cowles.yale.edu/ The Cowles Commission and Foundation for Research in Economics Robert W. Dimand Department of Economics Brock University 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way St. Catharines, Ontario L2S 3A1 Canada Telephone: 1-905-688-5550 x. 3125 Fax: 1-905-688-6388 E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Cowles Commission, formalism in economics, mathematics in economics, Cowles approach to econometrics JEL classifications: B23 History of Economic Thought since 1925: Econometrics, Quantitative and Mathematical Studies, B41 Economic Methodology, C01 Econometrics, C02 Mathematical Methods Abstract: Founded in 1932 by a newspaper heir disillusioned by the failure of forecasters to predict the Great Crash, the Cowles Commission promoted the use of formal mathematical and statistical methods in economics, initially through summer research conferences in Colorado and through support of the Econometric Society (of which Alfred Cowles was secretary-treasurer for decades). After moving to the University of Chicago in 1939, the Cowles Commission sponsored works, many later honored with Nobel Prizes but at the time out of the mainstream of economics, by Haavelmo, Hurwicz and Koopmans on econometrics, Arrow and Debreu on general equilibrium, Yntema and Mosak on general equilibrium in international trade theory, Arrow on social choice, Koopmans on activity analysis, Klein on macroeconometric modelling, Lange, Marschak and Patinkin on macroeconomic theory, and Markowitz on portfolio choice, but came into intense methodological, ideological and personal conflict with the emerging “Chicago school.” This conflict led the Cowles Commission to move to Yale in 1955 as the Cowles Foundation, directed by James Tobin (who had declined to move to Chicago to direct it).
    [Show full text]
  • Léon Walras, Irving Fisher and the Cowles Approach to General Equilibrium Analysis
    LÉON WALRAS, IRVING FISHER AND THE COWLES APPROACH TO GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS By Robert W. Dimand December 2019 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 2205 COWLES FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS YALE UNIVERSITY Box 208281 New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8281 http://cowles.yale.edu/ Léon Walras, Irving Fisher and the Cowles Approach to General Equilibrium Analysis Robert W. Dimand Department of Economics, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: This paper explores the relationship of Walras’s work to a particularly influential tradition of general equilibrium, that associated with the Cowles Commission for Research in Economics in Colorado in the 1930s and at the University of Chicago from 1939 to 1955, and its successor, the Cowles Foundation, at Yale University from 1955. Irving Fisher introduced general equilibrium analysis into North America with his 1891 Yale dissertation Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Prices (published 1892) and was responsible in 1892 for the first English translation of a monograph by Walras. Fisher was only able to obtain copies of books by Walras and Edgeworth when his thesis was almost ready for submission, discovering that he had independently reinvented a general equilibrium approach already developed by others, but went beyond Walras in constructing a hydraulic mechanism to simulate computation of general equilibrium and, before Pareto, in using indifference curves. Fisher was closely involved with Alfred Cowles in the Cowles Commission, the Econometric Society and Econometrica in the 1930s, promoting formal mathematical and statistical methods in economics, including drawing attention to the contributions of Walras, Edgeworth and Pareto.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbert Scarf (1930-2015) by John B. Shoven and John Whalley
    Herbert Scarf (1930-2015) John B. Shoven and John Whalley Herbert Eli Scarf died on November 15, 2015. The obituary in the New York Times was titled “Herbert Scarf, 85, Professor Who Shaped Economic Policy,” (Roberts, 2015). This title is pretty remarkable, really, when you consider that Herb Scarf never took an economics class in his life. Both his undergraduate and graduate training were in mathematics. And yet, the New York Times title was completely appropriate. Herb Scarf became a remarkable economist and his work enabled the whole field of applied general equilibrium (AGE) economics to develop. The Times article quoted Glenn Hubbard, former Chairman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisors, as saying that “the Scarf Algorithm was a revolutionary advance in economic analysis that has helped shape policies affecting every American.” We might add that is not just every American who may have been affected by this policy evaluation tool and note that AGE models are in use the world over. These models have helped evaluate government policies in the U.K., Canada, Mexico, Japan, China, Australia, Vietnam, the Philippines, and Cote d’Ivoire, just to name some of the more prominent examples. Glenn Hubbard was further quoted as saying “the Scarf Algorithm made much of modern policy analysis possible.” The same Times obituary quoted Larry Summers, former U.S. Treasury Secretary and Head of the National Economic Council, as saying “No economist has done more to import math (to economics) over the last half-century than Herbert Scarf.” Scarf made many seminal contributions to economics. His work was brilliantly summarized by Kenneth J.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdffull Publication
    A Symposium Sponsored By The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City PRICE STABILITY AND PUBLIC POLICY A Symposium Sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Jackson Hole, Wyoming August 2-3, 1984 Contents Foreword ............................................... v The Contributors ......................................... vii The Moderators .......................................... xi 1. The Causes of Inflation. Frederic S. Mishkin ............... 1 Commentary. William Nordhaus ...................... 25 2. The Benefits of Price Stability. Stanley Fischer .............. 33 Commentary. Robert J Shiller ........................ 51 3. Estimated Tradeoffs Between Unemployment and Inflation. Ray C Fair .......................... 57 Commentary. Robert J Gordon ....................... 83 Rejoinder. Ray C. Fair ............................... 95 4. The Role of the Central Bank in Achieving Price Stability: An International Perspective. Helmut Schlesinger ....... 97 5. Credibility and Monetary Policy. Bennett I: McCallum .......105 Commentary. Alan Blinder ...........................129 6. Monetary Strategy with an Elastic Price Standard. Robert E. Hall ....................................137 Commentary. Raymond Lombra ...................... 161 iv Contents 7. The Value of Intermediate Targets in Implementing Monetary Policy. Benjamin M. Friedman .............. 169 Commentary. Stephen M. Goldfeld .................... 193 8. Overview Panel James Tobin .......................................201 Allan H. Meltzer ...................................209
    [Show full text]