A-New-Look-At-Inflation.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A-New-Look-At-Inflation.Pdf Job Name:2105159 Date:14-12-30 PDF Page:2105159pbc.p1.pdf Color: Magenta Yellow Black THE AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR .PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH, established in 1943, is a publicly supported, nonpartisan research and educational organization. Its purpose is to assist policy makers, scholars, businessmen, the press and the public by providing objective analysis of national and international issues. Views expressed in the institute's publications are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers or trustees of AEI. Institute publications take three major forms: 1. Legislative and Special Analyses-balanced analyses of current legislative pro­ posals and special policy issues prepared with the help of specialists from the academic world and the fields of law and government. 2. Studies-in-depth studies and monographs about government programs and major national and international problems, written by independent scholars. 3. Rational Debates and Symposia-proceedings of debates, seminars, and confer­ ences where eminent authorities with contrasting views discuss controversial issues. ADVISORY BOARD Paul W. McCracken, Chairman, Edmund Ezra Day University Professor of Business Administration, University of Michigan R. H. Coase, Professor of Economics, University of Chicago Milton Friedman, Paul S. Russell Distinguished Service Professor of Economics .. University of Chicago Gottfried Haberler, Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research c. Lowell Harriss, Professor of Economics, Columbia University Paul G. Kauper, Henry M. Butzel Professor of Laro, University of Michigan George Lenczowski, Professor of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley Robert A. Nisbet, Professor of Sociology and History, University of Arizona lanles A. Robinson, President, Macalester College Joseph T. Sneed,* Dean, School of Law, Duke University EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Herman J. Schmidt, Chairman of the Board Richard J. Farrell William J. Baroody, President Dean Fite William G. McClintock, Treasurer SENIOR STAFF Thomas F. Johnson, Director of Research Earl H. Voss, Assistant to the Presi­ Joseph G. Butts, Director of Legislative dent for Special Programs Analysis Gary Jones, Assistant to the President Anne Brunsdale, Director of Publications for Administration Robert J. Pranger, Director of Foreign and Gordon S. Hodgson, Assistant to the Defense Policy Studies President for Development Dave M. O'Neill, Director of Human Resources Studies * On leave for government service A NEW LOOK AT INFLATION A NEW LOOK AT INFLATION Economic Policy in the Early 1970s Phillip Cagan • Marten Estey • William Fellner Gottfried Haberler • Charles E. McLure, Jr. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research Washington, D. C. Distributed to the Trade by National Book Network, 15200 NBN Way, Blue Ridge Summit, PA 17214. To order call toll free 1-800-462-6420 or 1-717-794-3800. For all other inquiries please contact the AEI Press, 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 or call 1-800-862-5801. This volume is presented within the framework of the American Enterprise Institute's research project on economic policy and infla­ tion, William J. Fellner, project director. Participants in that project who contributed the studies in this volume are: PHILLIP CAGAN, professor of economics at Columbia University and adjunct scholar of the American Enterprise Institute. CHARLES E. McLURE, JR., Allyn and Gladys Cline professor of economics and finance at Rice University and adjunct scholar of the American Enterprise Institute. GOTTFRIED HABERLER, Galen L. Stone professor of economics (emeritus), Harvard University, and resident scholar of the American Enterprise Institute. MARTEN ESTEY, professor of management and industrial relations} The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, and adjunct scholar of the American Enterprise Institute. WILLIAM J. FELLNER, Sterling professor of economics (emeritus), Yale University, and resident scholar of the American Enterprise Institute. Domestic Affairs Study 17~ September 1973 ISBN 0-8447-3113-7 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number L.C. 73-87768 © 1973 by American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1150 Seven­ teenth Street, N.W., Washington, D. C. Permission to quote from or to reproduce materials in this publication is granted when due acknowledgment is made. Printed in Unitea States of America CONTENTS PREFACE William Fellner 1 CONTROLS AND MONETARY POLICY, 1969-1973 Phillip Cagan 1 Introduction 1 Progress in Curbing the Inflation before Controls 3 The Economy under Controls 13 Summary and Evaluation 30 2 ~]lADUALISM AND THE NEW ECONOMIC POLICY: iSCAL ECONOMICS IN TRANSITION Charles E. McLure,]r. 35 Introduction and Conclusions 35 Kennedy-Johnson Economics 40 The Game Plan of Gradualism 46 Nixon"s New Economic Policy 52 Nixon's Fiscal Policy Appraised 65 3 INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS OF U.S. INFLATION Gottfried Haberler 79 Introduction 79 Historical Perspectives 80 Recent Developments: August 15, 1971 to June 1973 84 The Nature of the Recent Crisis 88 The Weakness of the Dollar and the American Inflation 90 Some Implications for the Future of the International Monetary System 96 Postscript: Developments since Completion of This Paper 99 4 WAGE STABILIZATION POLICY AND THE NIXON ADMINISTRATION Marten Estey 107 Introduction 107 Phase I: The Wage-Price Freeze 110 Phase II 111 Phase III 125 The 1973 Price Freeze and Phase IV 126 What Happened to Wages during Controls? 127 Conclusion 132 5 EMPLOYMENT GOALS AND MONETARY-FISCAL OVEREXPANSION William Fellner 135 Note on the Price Freeze Announced after Completion of the Study 135 Overview 136 Manpower Problems: 1956-57,1965,1972 143 Inflation: Its Acceleration, Deceleration and Revived Acceleration 149 The Danger of Trusting the Hypothesis of "Inflationary Equilibrium" in Very Tight Labor Markets 156 Money Supply Targets 159 Differential Hardship Cases in a 5 Percent versus a 4 Percent Unemployment Economy 165 Conclusion 168 Appendix: The Controversy about "Neo-Keynesianism" and "Monetarism" 169 PREFACE This volume is a sequel to Economic Policy and Inflation in the Sixties, a collection of studies begun in ·1970 and published by the American Enterprise Institute in April 1972. In addition to concerning itself with the antecedents of the problems faced in 1970-71, the first volume attempted to evaluate the policies that were adopted during the period in which our studies were being written. The present volume continues our survey and evaluation through the spring of 1973, again taking account of the antecedents that are relevant to the analysis of the more recent period. Somewhere between the time when our first volume was pub­ lished and the present, chances appeared to be good that the rate of inflation would be reduced to a very moderate level at adequate rates of resource utilization. In my appraisal, explained in the last of the five studies in this volume, this had to do with the fact that until some time in 1972 it could be hoped that expansionary policies resulting with a lag in significant overshooting would be avoided. However, perhaps mainly under the influence of strong criticism voiced by their opponents, policy makers grew impatient and adopted a course that became, after a while, one of substantial overexpansion. By the early part of 1973 inflation flared anew, and only partly because of adverse factors-hopefully temporary ones-affect­ ing the supply side of raw-material markets. In good part we are now confronted with the consequences of overambitious expan­ sionary policies against which a fair number of economists, including members of our group, have been warning policy makers for several years. The dangerous tendency to overexpand demand and then to try to suppress the symptoms by methods of direct control-methods that weaken the incentive to adjust supplies to demand-seems exceedingly difficult to fight. WILLIAM FELLNER To me this belongs among the most disturbing experiences of recent times. However,' on no matter should I speak here for the group as a whole, not even on matters regarding which I would expect similarity of views. On some of the problems discussed in the present volume the reader will be offered a fair degree of diversity of opinion, and I hope he will find this as refreshing as we did in our meetings. I am happy to be able to note that this time Professor Gottfried Haberler has participated in our joint effort with a paper on the international aspects of the inflation problem. Professor Thomas Gale Moore, who wrote a study for our earlier volume, has been engaged in other research, partly also undertaken for the American Enterprise Institute, and he is not among the contributors to the present volume. Professors Cagan, Estey, McLure and I have con­ tributed to both volumes. William Fellner Project director 1 CONTROLS AND MONETARY POLICY, 1969-1973 Phillip Cagan Price controls were originally imposed in mid-1971. The rationale was to contain the inflation while stronger monetary and fiscal policies were to speed the recovery and restore full employment. The experience of 1971-72 convinced the general public of the effectiveness of con­ trols, and the nation returned to them, after the brief respite of Phase Ill, 1vhen prices exploded in 1973. Con­ trols are likely to remain a serious option of policy in the future. The interpretation of recent events presented here is that the public's faith in controls is misdirected. They appeared to work earlier only because markets were slack; and they failed to stop the price explosion in early 1973, not because Phase III controls were too weak, but because the monetary authorities, lulled by confidence in the effec­ tiveness of controls, followed an overexpansive monetary policy that pushed the econon1Y to capacity levels of opera­ tion at top speed. The new round of straitjacket controls will not work against the resulting outbreak of demand­ pull inflation, which can only be subdued by monetary restraint. Introduction During the first half of 1973 prices erupted in one of the strongest bursts of peacetime inflation in U.S. history. The skyrocketing prices of foods brought housewives out in angry protest.
Recommended publications
  • Gottfried Haberler: a Century Appreciation*
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Gottfried Haberler: A Century Appreciation* Richard M. Ebeling* _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ During the first week of July in 1936, an inter- work. Indeed, "Haberler-like methods" became a national conference on the "Problems of Economic catch phrase of the entire conference.1 Change" was held in Annecy, France. It brought Haberler had spent two years carefully together such notable economists as Ludwig von researching and consulting on the various Mises, Wilhelm Ropke, Oskar Morgenstern, Bertil competing theories
    [Show full text]
  • “Exceptional and Unimportant”? Externalities, Competitive Equilibrium, and the Myth of a Pigovian Tradition
    “Exceptional and Unimportant”? Externalities, Competitive Equilibrium, and the Myth of a Pigovian Tradition Steven G. Medema* Version 2.3 January 2019 Forthcoming, History of Political Economy * University Distinguished Professor of Economics, University of Colorado Denver. Email: [email protected]. The author has benefitted greatly from comments on earlier drafts of this paper provided by Roger Backhouse, Nathalie Berta, Ross Emmett, Kenji Fujii, Kerry Krutilla, Alain Marciano, Norikazu Takami, participants in the CHOPE workshop at Duke University, the editor, and two anonymous referees. The financial support provided by the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Earhart Foundation, the Institute for New Economic Thinking, and the University of Colorado Denver is gratefully acknowledged. “Exceptional and Unimportant”? Externalities, Competitive Equilibrium, and the Myth of a Pigovian Tradition I. Introduction Economists typically locate the origins of the theory of externalities in A.C. Pigou’s The Economics of Welfare (1920), where Pigou suggested that activities which generate uncompensated benefits or costs—e.g., pollution, lighthouses, scientific research— represent instances of market failure requiring government corrective action.1 According to this history, Pigou’s effort gave rise to an unbroken Pigovian tradition in externality theory that continues to exert a substantial presence in the literature to this day, even with the stiff criticisms of it laid down by Ronald Coase (1960) and others beginning in the 1960s.2 This paper challenges that view. It demonstrates that, in the aftermath of the publication of The Economics of Welfare, economists paid almost no attention to externalities. On the rare occasions when externalities were mentioned, it was in the context of whether a competitive equilibrium could produce an efficient allocation of resources and to note that externalities were an impediment to the attainment of the optimum.
    [Show full text]
  • 03 Black 1749.Indd
    BOB BLACK Robert Denis Collison Black 1922–2008 Early years ROBERT DENIS COLLISON BLACK, Bob Black to an international circle of friends, was born 11 June 1922 at Morehampton Terrace, Dublin.1 His father, William Robert Black, was company secretary for a small group of companies in the grain trade.2 His mother was Rosa Anna Mary, née Reid. Dublin at the time of Black’s birth was experiencing considerable disturbance, though he rarely alluded to this.3 Black was educated at Sandford Park School, Dublin. However he became disenchanted with the school4 and contrived, astonishingly, to enter Trinity College, Dublin at the age of 15. Even more remarkably, he seems to have managed perfectly well as a 15-year old amongst much older students. He managed to complete two undergraduate degree courses. He enrolled for a commerce degree, but Trinity at that time required those 1 The family moved to Waltham Terrace when Black was fi ve. Bob Black gave a long and detailed interview to Antoin Murphy and Renee Prendergast which was published in his Festschrift. See A. Murphy and R. Prendergast (eds.), Contributions to the History of Economic Thought. Essays in Honour of R. D. C. Black (London, 2000), p. 3. 2 Black gave another interview which is recorded in K. Tribe, Economic Careers. Economics and Economists in Britain 1930–1970 (London, 1997). See Tribe, p. 96, for the occupation of Black’s father. The latter was a considerable expert in his fi eld. I can remember Black telling me how he could sniff a handful of grain and detect its origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Nine Lives of Neoliberalism
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) Book — Published Version Nine Lives of Neoliberalism Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) (2020) : Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, ISBN 978-1-78873-255-0, Verso, London, New York, NY, https://www.versobooks.com/books/3075-nine-lives-of-neoliberalism This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/215796 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality of What Among Whom?: Rival Conceptions of Distribution In
    1 2 3 4 5 INEQUALITY OF WHAT AMONG 6 7 WHOM?: RIVAL CONCEPTIONS OF 8 9 DISTRIBUTION IN THE 20TH 10 ଝ 11 CENTURY 12 13 14 Robert S. Goldfarb and Thomas C. Leonard 15 16 17 ABSTRACT 18 19 Distribution concerns who gets what. But does “who” refer to the 20 personal distribution of income among individuals or the functional 21 distribution of income among suppliers of productive factors? For nearly 150 22 years,Anglophone distribution theory followed the Ricardian emphasis on 23 functional distribution – the income shares of labor,land,and capital. Only 24 beginning in the 1960s,and consolidated by a research outpouring in the 25 early 1970s,does mainstream economics turn to the personal conception 26 of distribution. This essay documents Anglophone (primarily American) 27 economics’ move from functional to personal distribution,and tries to 28 illuminate something of its causes and timing. 29 30 ଝ The authors have benefitted from conversations with and/or suggestions from Steve Baldwin, 31 Rachel Boaz, Bryan Boulier, Barry Chiswick, Carmel Chiswick, Joseph Cordes, Edwin Dean, David 32 Greenberg, Daniel Hamermesh, Pam Labadie, David Lindauer, Ben Okner, Don Parsons, David 33 Pritchett, Malcolm Rutherford and Stephen Smith in the course of writing this paper. We also benefitted 34 from comments during presentations at the Eastern Economic Association meetings March 2002, the 35 History of Economics Society meetings July 2003 and during seminar presentations at George Mason University, George Washington University, and the University of Maryland Baltimore County. 36 37 A Research Annual 38 Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, Volume 23-A, 79–123 Copyright © 2005 by Elsevier Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham Revisiting Samuelson's Foundations of Economic Analysis
    University of Birmingham Revisiting Samuelson's Foundations of Economic Analysis Backhouse, Roger DOI: 10.1257/jel.53.2.326 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Backhouse, R 2015, 'Revisiting Samuelson's Foundations of Economic Analysis' Journal of Economic Literature, vol 53, no. 2, pp. 326-350. DOI: 10.1257/jel.53.2.326 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights When referring to this publication, please cite the published version. Copyright and associated moral rights for publications accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners. It is a condition of accessing this publication that users abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • You may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. • Users may download and print one copy of the publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. • If a Creative Commons licence is associated with this publication, please consult the terms and conditions cited therein. • Unless otherwise stated, you may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Take down policy If you believe that this document infringes copyright please contact [email protected] providing details and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate. Download date: 16. May. 2017 Journal of Economic Literature 2015, 53(2), 326–350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.53.2.326 Revisiting Samuelson’s Foundations of Economic Analysis† Roger E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideological Profiles of the Economics Laureates · Econ Journal Watch
    Discuss this article at Journaltalk: http://journaltalk.net/articles/5811 ECON JOURNAL WATCH 10(3) September 2013: 255-682 Ideological Profiles of the Economics Laureates LINK TO ABSTRACT This document contains ideological profiles of the 71 Nobel laureates in economics, 1969–2012. It is the chief part of the project called “Ideological Migration of the Economics Laureates,” presented in the September 2013 issue of Econ Journal Watch. A formal table of contents for this document begins on the next page. The document can also be navigated by clicking on a laureate’s name in the table below to jump to his or her profile (and at the bottom of every page there is a link back to this navigation table). Navigation Table Akerlof Allais Arrow Aumann Becker Buchanan Coase Debreu Diamond Engle Fogel Friedman Frisch Granger Haavelmo Harsanyi Hayek Heckman Hicks Hurwicz Kahneman Kantorovich Klein Koopmans Krugman Kuznets Kydland Leontief Lewis Lucas Markowitz Maskin McFadden Meade Merton Miller Mirrlees Modigliani Mortensen Mundell Myerson Myrdal Nash North Ohlin Ostrom Phelps Pissarides Prescott Roth Samuelson Sargent Schelling Scholes Schultz Selten Sen Shapley Sharpe Simon Sims Smith Solow Spence Stigler Stiglitz Stone Tinbergen Tobin Vickrey Williamson jump to navigation table 255 VOLUME 10, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2013 ECON JOURNAL WATCH George A. Akerlof by Daniel B. Klein, Ryan Daza, and Hannah Mead 258-264 Maurice Allais by Daniel B. Klein, Ryan Daza, and Hannah Mead 264-267 Kenneth J. Arrow by Daniel B. Klein 268-281 Robert J. Aumann by Daniel B. Klein, Ryan Daza, and Hannah Mead 281-284 Gary S. Becker by Daniel B.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction of Inflation by Slack Demand Phillip Cagan
    The Reduction of Inflation by Slack Demand Phillip Cagan Summary The persistence of inflation in the past decade has undermined confi­ dence in our capability of reducing it. To many it appears intractable. While the inflation rate has declined in periods of business recession, it has revived and intensified in the subsequent periods of business ex­ pansion. The dissatisfaction with traditional monetary and fiscal meas­ ures has brought forth schemes to restrain price increases directly by taxes or subsidies, though these hold no more promise of being effective than have direct controls on prices or incomes policies in the past. The dissatisfaction reflects in part the failure of inflation, in a busi­ ness recovery such as 1975-1977, to continue to decline while excess unemployment is reduced. The belief that inflation should decline is based on the presumption that it always tends to decline so long as re­ sources are not fully employed and markets exhibit slack. But that is not an accurate view of historical price behavior. The inflation rate has always fluctuated over the business cycle, falling during business con­ tractions and rising during expansions, invariably beginning to rise early in business recoveries long before economic slack gives way to full-employment output, for a reduction in the inflation rate that out­ lasts the business cycle, the rate will be lower in corresponding stages of successive business cycles. For such a reduction in inflation, policy must reduce the expected rate of inflation. This rate reflects the anticipated long-run equilibrium trend of prices and underlies explicit and implicit contracts for future payments and the setting of wages and prices gen- I am indebted to William Fellner, John Taylor, and the authors of this volume for helpful comments and to Fred Kittler for computer assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cowles Commission and Foundation for Research in Economics
    THE COWLES COMMISSION AND FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS By Robert W. Dimand November 2019 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 2207 COWLES FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS YALE UNIVERSITY Box 208281 New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8281 http://cowles.yale.edu/ The Cowles Commission and Foundation for Research in Economics Robert W. Dimand Department of Economics Brock University 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way St. Catharines, Ontario L2S 3A1 Canada Telephone: 1-905-688-5550 x. 3125 Fax: 1-905-688-6388 E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Cowles Commission, formalism in economics, mathematics in economics, Cowles approach to econometrics JEL classifications: B23 History of Economic Thought since 1925: Econometrics, Quantitative and Mathematical Studies, B41 Economic Methodology, C01 Econometrics, C02 Mathematical Methods Abstract: Founded in 1932 by a newspaper heir disillusioned by the failure of forecasters to predict the Great Crash, the Cowles Commission promoted the use of formal mathematical and statistical methods in economics, initially through summer research conferences in Colorado and through support of the Econometric Society (of which Alfred Cowles was secretary-treasurer for decades). After moving to the University of Chicago in 1939, the Cowles Commission sponsored works, many later honored with Nobel Prizes but at the time out of the mainstream of economics, by Haavelmo, Hurwicz and Koopmans on econometrics, Arrow and Debreu on general equilibrium, Yntema and Mosak on general equilibrium in international trade theory, Arrow on social choice, Koopmans on activity analysis, Klein on macroeconometric modelling, Lange, Marschak and Patinkin on macroeconomic theory, and Markowitz on portfolio choice, but came into intense methodological, ideological and personal conflict with the emerging “Chicago school.” This conflict led the Cowles Commission to move to Yale in 1955 as the Cowles Foundation, directed by James Tobin (who had declined to move to Chicago to direct it).
    [Show full text]
  • Léon Walras, Irving Fisher and the Cowles Approach to General Equilibrium Analysis
    LÉON WALRAS, IRVING FISHER AND THE COWLES APPROACH TO GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS By Robert W. Dimand December 2019 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 2205 COWLES FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS YALE UNIVERSITY Box 208281 New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8281 http://cowles.yale.edu/ Léon Walras, Irving Fisher and the Cowles Approach to General Equilibrium Analysis Robert W. Dimand Department of Economics, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: This paper explores the relationship of Walras’s work to a particularly influential tradition of general equilibrium, that associated with the Cowles Commission for Research in Economics in Colorado in the 1930s and at the University of Chicago from 1939 to 1955, and its successor, the Cowles Foundation, at Yale University from 1955. Irving Fisher introduced general equilibrium analysis into North America with his 1891 Yale dissertation Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Prices (published 1892) and was responsible in 1892 for the first English translation of a monograph by Walras. Fisher was only able to obtain copies of books by Walras and Edgeworth when his thesis was almost ready for submission, discovering that he had independently reinvented a general equilibrium approach already developed by others, but went beyond Walras in constructing a hydraulic mechanism to simulate computation of general equilibrium and, before Pareto, in using indifference curves. Fisher was closely involved with Alfred Cowles in the Cowles Commission, the Econometric Society and Econometrica in the 1930s, promoting formal mathematical and statistical methods in economics, including drawing attention to the contributions of Walras, Edgeworth and Pareto.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbert Scarf (1930-2015) by John B. Shoven and John Whalley
    Herbert Scarf (1930-2015) John B. Shoven and John Whalley Herbert Eli Scarf died on November 15, 2015. The obituary in the New York Times was titled “Herbert Scarf, 85, Professor Who Shaped Economic Policy,” (Roberts, 2015). This title is pretty remarkable, really, when you consider that Herb Scarf never took an economics class in his life. Both his undergraduate and graduate training were in mathematics. And yet, the New York Times title was completely appropriate. Herb Scarf became a remarkable economist and his work enabled the whole field of applied general equilibrium (AGE) economics to develop. The Times article quoted Glenn Hubbard, former Chairman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisors, as saying that “the Scarf Algorithm was a revolutionary advance in economic analysis that has helped shape policies affecting every American.” We might add that is not just every American who may have been affected by this policy evaluation tool and note that AGE models are in use the world over. These models have helped evaluate government policies in the U.K., Canada, Mexico, Japan, China, Australia, Vietnam, the Philippines, and Cote d’Ivoire, just to name some of the more prominent examples. Glenn Hubbard was further quoted as saying “the Scarf Algorithm made much of modern policy analysis possible.” The same Times obituary quoted Larry Summers, former U.S. Treasury Secretary and Head of the National Economic Council, as saying “No economist has done more to import math (to economics) over the last half-century than Herbert Scarf.” Scarf made many seminal contributions to economics. His work was brilliantly summarized by Kenneth J.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdffull Publication
    A Symposium Sponsored By The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City PRICE STABILITY AND PUBLIC POLICY A Symposium Sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Jackson Hole, Wyoming August 2-3, 1984 Contents Foreword ............................................... v The Contributors ......................................... vii The Moderators .......................................... xi 1. The Causes of Inflation. Frederic S. Mishkin ............... 1 Commentary. William Nordhaus ...................... 25 2. The Benefits of Price Stability. Stanley Fischer .............. 33 Commentary. Robert J Shiller ........................ 51 3. Estimated Tradeoffs Between Unemployment and Inflation. Ray C Fair .......................... 57 Commentary. Robert J Gordon ....................... 83 Rejoinder. Ray C. Fair ............................... 95 4. The Role of the Central Bank in Achieving Price Stability: An International Perspective. Helmut Schlesinger ....... 97 5. Credibility and Monetary Policy. Bennett I: McCallum .......105 Commentary. Alan Blinder ...........................129 6. Monetary Strategy with an Elastic Price Standard. Robert E. Hall ....................................137 Commentary. Raymond Lombra ...................... 161 iv Contents 7. The Value of Intermediate Targets in Implementing Monetary Policy. Benjamin M. Friedman .............. 169 Commentary. Stephen M. Goldfeld .................... 193 8. Overview Panel James Tobin .......................................201 Allan H. Meltzer ...................................209
    [Show full text]