14 Spatial-structural change in food retailing in the UK

Leigh Sparks

Keywords: food retailing, competition, policy, spatial-structural change, .

Introduction This chapter aims to provide an evaluation of the development of the food retailing sector in the UK. It considers the rationale, implications and trajectory of the spatial-structural changes that have occurred. It situates businesses within a network of supply and demand chains and emphasizes dimensions of change, power and competition. This analysis then focuses on the implications of recent turbulence in the sector, before refl ecting on future possible directions of change. After the Second World War, the UK underwent a fundamental reconstruction of its food retailing sector. From a position of controlled prices, manufacturer dominance and small counter-service stores, food retailing has been transformed. A rise in retailer power at the expense of manufacturer power has seen retailers take control of the organization of the entire food chain (Marsden and Wrigley, 2006; Clarke et al., 2002; Clarke, 2000 ). At the store level, the end of the twentieth century saw an almost uniformity of approach through the dominance of the large-format, self-service, out-of-town, food store (superstore and hypermarket). Organizationally, an oligarchy with a dominant market leader had emerged (Burt and Sparks, 2003 ). Food retailing in the UK is a major sector of the economy. The Institute of Grocery Distribution (IGD, 2014) valued the retail sales in UK grocery retailing in 2014 at £174.5 billion, with grocery sales accounting for 54.5p of every pound spend in retail in the UK. They estimate that hypermarkets account for 42 per cent of this spend, superstores 20 per cent, convenience stores 21 per cent, discounters 6 per cent and online 4.5 per cent. is the dominant retailer with around 28 per cent of the market, followed by Sainsbury and with 15–16 per cent each. Table 14.1 attempts a classifi cation of this market in terms of organizational forms, operational forms, store formats and motivation. The dominant form has become the hypermarket and superstore, operated by corporate retailers for profi t. Recently this has been challenged by discount, convenience and internet retailing, but again multiple owned and profi t oriented. This 70-year transformation of the sector has not been uncontested; nor is it concluded. Since 2000, the themes of convenience and of digital shopping (the internet) have emerged strongly. There has also been a rising concern over the provenance of food and food products, driven not least by various food scares (including BSE and horsemeat), the continuing debate over access to (healthy) food for all, and the implications of potential abuses of retailer power in supply chains. There is a small but increasing development of operations that have social and equity motives and are independently operated, which can be locally signifi cant.

99781472456052_pi-325.indd781472456052_pi-325.indd 220000 55/12/2016/12/2016 112:44:522:44:52 PPMM 99781472456052_pi-325.indd 201 7 8 1 4 7 2 4 5 6 0 5 2 _ p i - 3 2 5 . i n d d

2 0 1 Table 14.1 A classifi cation of food retailing in the UK

Organizational forms

Multiple/corporate A chain of shops trading under common ownership, often as a company quoted on the stock market. Many stores might trade under the same fascia or name. Cooperative As above, but ownership is by collective membership. Independent A single shop that is owned and operated by the same person or business Affi liated Independent businesses that become members of collective buying or operating groups and thus trade under a common name but retain their independent ownership. Various legal forms of contract exist including franchises. Operational forms Fixed store A shop that operates on a fi xed plot of land. Virtual store A shop that operates on the internet. Mobile store A shop that travels around, often by vehicle. Market stall A shop in a market space – this could be fi xed or mobile. Store formats Hypermarket A large store, more than 50,000 sq. ft selling area, selling food and non-food products and often ancillary services. Superstore A large store, more than 25,000 sq. ft selling area, selling food and non-food products. A store of more than 10,000 sq. ft selling area, selling primarily food. A small store focusing on immediate shopping needs of consumers. Discount store A store selling a limited line of products at deep discounts to competitors. Specialist store A small store focusing on a particular line of trade; for example, butchers, fi shmongers, bakers. General food store A small store selling a range of food products. Motivation Profi t motive The aim of the business is to make a profi t and reward the owners in proportion to their ownership. Cooperative motive The aim of the business is to make a surplus and to redistribute this to members on the basis of their membership and not their shareholdings. Social motive The aim of the business is to operate on the basis of some over-riding principles or belief and not for the sole purpose of making a profi t Equity motive The aim of the business is to ensure that fair access to products and to rewards is available to all. 55/12/2016 12:44:52 PM / 1 2 / 2 0 1 6

1 2 : 4 4 : 5 2

P M 202 Leigh Sparks In spatial-structural terms, these changes illustrate a growing challenge to the uniform dominance of the out-of-town superstore/hypermarket. Recent years have seen the rise of smaller discount stores such as and . Convenience retailing (local, metro, urban central stores) has become a major growth sector for food retailing. Internet ordering has increased spectacularly, focusing attention on customer collection/delivery of product and causing the emergence of so-called ‘dark stores’, satisfying high-density urban home delivery. There is thus an increasing rethink over the development and sustainability of large format stores. At the same time, local and specialist food retailers have exploited internet and physical opportunities to directly sell their products to consumers via farmers markets, local alternative supply net- works, home delivery and socially oriented . Food poverty issues, however, have also brought about a rapid expansion in the number and use of food banks. This changing structure of food retailing has seen changes at sector, organization and store level. Understanding these is vital in comprehending the impacts of food retail sector change on communities, places and individuals.

Power and competition in the UK food retail sector The immediate post-war period for the UK economy was a diffi cult one, not least for food retailers who were still struggling with rationing, other controls and constraints and a restricted consumer ability to purchase and consume. The food retailing landscape was one controlled by manufacturers, with food provided to consumers by a plethora of small shops – often inde- pendently or local cooperatively owned – and by local markets. The few multiple retailers of any size operated small-scale premises with counter-service. The contrast with the food retail industry of the early twenty-fi rst century is dramatic. Food retailing today is retailer dominated, with power having shifted from most manu- facturers to retailers (Dobson and Waterson, 1999; Clarke et al., 2002 ). The dominant retail organizational form is the multiple retailer, which account for the vast majority of sales. Independent and cooperative retailing are seen as the exceptions and not the norm. Food retailing is delivered not through the ‘standard’ retail format of the small high street shop, but rather through a combination of the superstore, the modern convenience store and the internet. Place and locality in food retailing is no longer the bedrock of the sector, and the independent shopkeeper is no longer the bastion of the national or local economy. This transformation has a number of dimensions, all associated with the transfer of channel power from the manufacturer to the retailer and the exercise of this power by the retailer to serve the changing needs of consumers. This transformation did not take place overnight, nor did it occur willingly. Retailers and manufacturers fought a number of legal battles over how to service the customer, most notably in the arenas of resale price maintenance, trading stamps, branding and supply chains. From the 1950s onwards, manufacturers increasingly lost the ability to set and maintain retail prices (Mercer, 2014 ). The emergence of aggressive price-cutters led to an increas- ing sense that the retailer, rather than the manufacturer, was the ‘friend’ of the consumer. Consumers, as they became more affl uent, sought to spend this money in diff erent ways, but nonetheless retained a sense of thrift. As retailers increasingly undercut resale prices and price competition increased, so consumers transferred their loyalties to those ‘on their side’. Second, retailers began to compete not only on price alone, but through marketing, including trading stamps, such as Green Shield. While focused on horizontal competition, the approach of using trading stamps further placed consumer attention on the retailer, as opposed to the manufacturer. This also extended, third, into the use of product-branding by the retailers.

99781472456052_pi-325.indd781472456052_pi-325.indd 220202 55/12/2016/12/2016 112:44:522:44:52 PPMM Spatial-structural change in food retailing in the UK 203 By developing generics and other retailer-named or retailer-controlled brand-name products, the retailer began to develop a product relationship with the consumer, eff ectively replacing the manufacturer relationship (Burt, 2000; Burt and Davies, 2010; Burt and Sparks, 2015 ). Finally, retailers also began to take more interest in, and ultimately control of, the supply chain to stores (Sparks, 2010 ). For a long period, retailers had been at the mercy of manu- facturers in terms of store delivery schedules and thus product availability and quality, but as retailers became larger and took more control of price and branding issues, so they sought to reorganize fl ows and exert their power over channel operations. These transformations took place mainly over the 1950s to 1970s. Resale price main- tenance in food eff ectively collapsed in the late 1950s, although remnants persisted into the late 1960s. Trading stamps became a key marketing tool in the 1960s and survived until the mid-1970s. Retail branding became signifi cant from the 1960s onwards, although it perhaps did not really reach its full potential until the 1990s. Supply chain control occurred in some retailers earlier than in others, but by the late 1970s retailers were focusing signifi cant man- agement attention on channel control and organization. At the same time, retailers sought to reconfi gure their store networks. Until the early 1960s, the food retail store was small-scale and often remained counter-service-based. Self-service techniques and technologies developed and became more widespread, and food product ranges became more extensive, encouraging an increase in store scale. Food shops became larger and developed into American-style supermarkets. As store size became a more import- ant consideration for the retail operator, so the location of the stores altered. Often unable to fi nd suitable retail premises in high streets, retailers began to look at alternative locations – for example, old cinemas, etc. – or increasingly to seek to build out-of-town in purpose-built stores, i.e., superstores and then hypermarkets (Dawson, 1988 ). On the management side, retailers were beginning to utilize modern computing technol- ogy to help run their increasingly complex operations; the capability of both management (Alexander, 2015 ) and technology expanded rapidly (e.g., barcoding and scanning, electronic funds transfer, information and communications networks). Retailers’ abilities to control oper- ations and especially to understand changing consumption patterns added to their knowledge at the expense of manufacturers. By the mid-1990s, the largest retailers were using the data collected by ‘loyalty’ cards to drive strategic and tactical change (Humby et al., 2003 ). This long-run change in how food has been made available to consumers by retailers (from a dense network of independent, small, high street counter-service stores to a sparser network of multiple, large-format, out of town self-service superstores) occurred at a time of massive consumer, societal, economic and cultural change (Kynaston, 2007, 2009, 2014 ). Consumers and society of the 1950s and 1960s are far removed from their counterparts of only 20 years later, let alone today. The consumption revolution witnessed an increase in affl uence and per- sonal mobility and the introduction of a vast array of consumer durables, many related to food storage, preparation and consumption. Consumers have seen an increase in food choice and in exercising this choice, they have aided retailers in reconfi guring the food retail landscape (Clarke et al., 2006; Jackson et al., 2006; Guy, 2010 ). Food retailing in the 1950s was often an everyday, female, housewife activity, focused on local, small independent stores. It is now more likely to be a shared responsibility carried out in a variety of ways and trips and focused around busy working lives. This time, poverty has witnessed a reduction in time to buy, prepare, cook and eat food in the home and a breakdown of traditional patterns and practices (Murcott, 1991 ). Speed and convenience have become the food bywords for many consumers, aided by technological developments such as ready meals, prepared foods and ‘fast food’. Eating out of the home, in quick-service restaurants or ‘grab ’n’

99781472456052_pi-325.indd781472456052_pi-325.indd 220303 55/12/2016/12/2016 112:44:522:44:52 PPMM 204 Leigh Sparks

Table 14.2 The UK’s largest retailers, 2013 and 1990/1991 (a) 2013

Rank Name UK sales (billion pounds) UK stores (number) UK sales area (million sq. ft)

1 Tesco 64.82 2948 37.59 2 Sainsbury’s 23.30 1106 20.34 3 Asda * 22.80 565 20.96 4 18.11 498 13.42 5 Kingfi sher Group 10.57 1025 59.85 6 Marks & Spencer 10.02 1253 22.48 7 Co-operative 7.44 2816 10.78 Group 8 Alliance Boots 6.54 2476 8.54 9 Home Retail 5.47 748 2.74 Group 10 John Lewis 3.04 40 4.58 Partnership

* Owned by Walmart (b) 1990/1991

Rank Name UK sales (billion pounds) UK stores UK sales area (million sq. ft)

1 Sainsbury’s 6.84 369 10.06 2 Tesco 6.35 384 9.66 3 Marks & Spencer 4.89 288 9.47 4 Argyll Group* 4.49 1113 8.37 5 Asda 4.34 365 10.27 6 Isosceles** 3.11 758 7.31 7 Kingfi sher 3.11 2095 19.20 8 Boots the Chemist 2.98 2266 N/A 9 John Lewis 1.97 116 3.51 Partnership 10 Sears 1.87 3432 N/A

*Argyll Group became Safeway, which merged with Morrisons; ** Isosceles became Somerfi eld, which was taken over by the Co-operative Group Source: 1990/1991 from Retail Intelligence/Mintel, The UK Retail Rankings , 1992. 2013 downloaded from www. retaileconomics.co.uk/top10-retailers.asp on 8 October 2014.

go’ at retail and other outlets, including sandwich and coff ee shops, are further refl ections of these changing patterns and the changed role of food. The accumulation of these tendencies and processes produced by the year 2000 an oli- gopolistic food retail system dominated by a highly powerful market leader (Tesco) and focused almost entirely on the superstore and hypermarket format. The oligopoly of Tesco, Asda, Sainsbury’s, Safeway and Morrisons – the ‘Big 5’ – was supported by other more special- ist operations such as , Marks & Spencer, the Co-operative, discounters such as Aldi and Lidl, and a large number of independent food retailers, although these had limited impact. This ‘Big 5’ had arisen through store and operational development that met consumers’ needs, and through the elimination of smaller rivals mainly, although not entirely, through takeover

99781472456052_pi-325.indd781472456052_pi-325.indd 220404 55/12/2016/12/2016 112:44:522:44:52 PPMM Spatial-structural change in food retailing in the UK 205 and merger (Wrigley, 1987 ). Tesco’s purchase of Wm Low is an example of a ‘regional’ mul- tiple failing to compete (Sparks, 1996 ). The 2003 Morrisons and Safeway merger refl ected the pressures even within the then ‘Big 5’. Scale and uniformity were the key components of the approach, seen most notably in the US Walmart-owned Asda, whose single format was the standard-sized, ‘cookie-cutter’ out-of-town superstore (Burt and Sparks, 2001 ). Table 14.2 shows the importance and scale of food retailers by 1990/1991, but more signifi cantly illus- trates the dominance and scale they had developed by 2013. Within these sector changes, the power and scale dynamics reached their apogee in the dominance of Tesco (Burt and Sparks, 2003 ). In the 1960s, Tesco was a publicity-hungry, although somewhat dysfunctional chain of small stores, mainly centred around London. Through merger and takeover and championing of the abolition of resale price maintenance (RPM) and the use of trading stamps, Tesco prospered. A generational boardroom battle that ousted the family founder set in place the new strategy operationalized through ‘Operation Checkout’ in 1977 (Akehurst, 1984 ). This strategy focused explicitly on price, removed trad- ing stamps and placed an overt emphasis on gaining and using scale and power. This saw Tesco develop very strongly through the 1980s. Its unidirectional focus on conforming superstores paid off in control, power and supply chain terms and resonated with the consumer. Even by the early 1990s, however, Tesco was still #2 behind Sainsbury’s. In 1992/1993, a series of strategic initiatives saw Tesco begin to gain market share at a phenomenal speed, become #1 in the UK and distance itself from competitors (Burt and Sparks, 2003; Sparks, 2011; Seth and Randall, 1999, 2005; Ryle, 2013 ). It is today, despite recent problems, a £60 billion business with more than 3,000 stores in the UK and a 28 per cent market share. Tesco’s strategic initiatives included their fi rst strategic internationalization, the devel- opment of Value lines and Finest as retailer brand positions, the opening of the fi rst stores in a multi-format strategy based on the Tesco name (e.g., Express, Extra), the introduction of aspects of a corporate brand with the strapline ‘Every little helps’ and the development of the Tesco loyalty programme, Clubcard. This latter development, derided at the time by Sainsbury’s as ‘electronic Green Shield stamps’, became the most successful such scheme in the world, but most importantly the data captured was used to enhance both strate- gic decision-making and tactical responses to consumer behaviour changes (Humby et al., 2003 ) at corporate and store level. Very rapidly Tesco had 30 per cent of the UK grocery market share based on a strong understanding of the market, power to change processes and practices, and control of the supply chain from producer to consumer. Others, including Walmart-owned Asda, struggled to keep up and compete (Sparks, 2011 ). Figure 14.1 shows this remarkable shift. This pattern of change towards a multiple retailer dominated sector and channel operating large-format, out-of-town stores raised a number of implications for consumers and produc- ers. The consumer impact can be seen in concerns regarding the access to food products, most notably in the concept of the ‘food desert’ and regarding the choice of products available (Wrigley, 2002; Beaulac et al., 2009; Donald, 2013 ). The impact on producers has been seen in the long-running concerns over the exercise of power by large retailers and the pressures faced by manufacturers and producers, most vocally farmers.

Power and competition: the legislative framework These changes in the food retailing market need to be set in the context of a public policy environment that has over time swithered over its approach to aspects of these changes (Findlay and Sparks, 2014 ), notably in terms of land-use planning policy and competition policy.

99781472456052_pi-325.indd781472456052_pi-325.indd 220505 55/12/2016/12/2016 112:44:522:44:52 PPMM 206 Leigh Sparks

35

30

25

20 Percentage

15

10

1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 12 weeks ending July

Tesco Sainsbury’s Asda

Figure 14.1 Grocery market shares of Tesco, Asda and Sainsbury’s, 1997–2014

In land-use planning terms, the originators of large-format, out-of-town food retailing in the UK did not receive a warm welcome. The land-use planning system was used to curtail development, but a steady number of such stores were developed through the 1970s. The Thatcher government of the 1980s, however, eff ectively pushed planning aside (totally in some areas such as Enterprise Zones) or reduced its impact. Planning was not to be a brake on competition but was instead to be more welcoming to more eff ective and effi cient land-uses. In terms of food retailing, larger, purpose-built, out-of-town stores are more productive than the smaller ones they replace (Griffi th and Harmgate, 2012). However, as superstores prolifer- ated and as consumers increasingly patronized them, so the eff ects on existing traders and on high streets and town centres became more noticeable (Dawson, 1988 ). As a consequence, since the mid-1990s there have again been planning constraints on superstore development. This ‘town centre fi rst’ policy has not really been able to address the situation of the diff eren- tial costs and natures of diff erent store types, although it has perhaps accelerated the develop- ment of smaller convenience stores by food retailers (Guy and Bennison, 2007; Wood et al., 2006; Wood and McCarthy, 2014 ). Others would argue that the ‘town centre fi rst’ policy has adversely impacted retailer, store and national productivity (Cheshire et al., 2015 ). In competition policy terms, the dominance of large multiple retailers has raised two main concerns over the past 30 or so years. First, there has been awareness that, as retailers became larger, so smaller competitors were squeezed out and diversity and choice reduced. Competition groups have debated whether in turn this leads to both adverse pressure on sup- pliers and producers and/or excess profi t-taking by the retailers (Dobson and Waterson, 1999; Dawson, 2000 ). Despite a large number of offi cial enquiries over this period (Competition Commission, 2000, 2007, 2008 ), the conclusion has tended to be that while there may have been some abuse of power, it has worked in the consumer’s favour (House of Commons, 2012 ). Nonetheless, the concerns about pressure on suppliers continue to reverberate (see dis- cussion later in this chapter). Second, competition authorities have been wary of the monopo- listic tendencies of these large food retailers. Morrisons and Safeway were allowed to merge in

99781472456052_pi-325.indd781472456052_pi-325.indd 220606 55/12/2016/12/2016 112:44:522:44:52 PPMM Spatial-structural change in food retailing in the UK 207 the early 2000s, although with some store sell-off s, but other larger retailers would not have received permission to takeover Safeway, despite their desires. National-level market concerns have thus played some part in limiting actions. At the local level, where some companies have been deemed to have too high a market share (colloquially ‘Tesco Towns’), even single-store acquisitions have been blocked. While there is no formal fascia test in land-use planning (Hughes et al., 2009 ), competition concerns have begun to intervene. The most surprising action of this period, however, was that in the early 2000s Tesco was allowed to purchase a number of convenience store chains, most notably One-Stop, without any concern from the competition authorities. The argument was that the main shop and the convenience markets were separate markets that did not compete or overlap and thus there were no competition issues arising. This has been challenged both by academics and also by events (Hallsworth et al., 2010; Hallsworth, 2010 ). This policy framework has thus allowed major retailers to develop both their main for- mats – the superstore and the hypermarket – and to enter the convenience market, both by takeover and more organically site by site. Tesco, Sainsbury’s, Morrisons and latterly Asda, as well as the Co-operative Group, Waitrose and Marks & Spencer have all expanded their smaller convenience store estate in the past ten or so years, at the same time as many of them have also expanded their large-format stores.

Recent trends The description above remains to some extent the situation in UK food retailing today. However, since the mid-2000s and especially with the onset of recession in 2008 compound- ing structural change through the take-off of the internet as a shopping channel, the sector has commenced considerable restructuring. The major recession from 2008 has focused atten- tion on price and costs, and is most clearly seen in the rapid rise of discounters such as Aldi and Lidl. Internet shopping, meanwhile, has become very popular for UK food retailing and has altered shopping signifi cantly, including assisting a revival of the convenient local store (Wrigley and Brookes, 2014 ). Discount retailing is not new in the UK, and indeed, as noted earlier, Tesco made much in the 1950s and 1960s of its price-cutting, consumer-friendly approach. Through the 1970s and 1980s, the indigenous discounter had some success and was followed in the 1990s by and the entry of foreign hard-line discounters such as Aldi, and Lidl (Burt and Sparks, 1995 ). These were not overnight successes, due both to their own operational fail- ings and to the responses of the major chains. Indeed Shoprite folded in 1995, being bought by Kwik Save, which itself went into administration in 2009. Netto exited the UK in 2010 by selling their stores to Asda, and Aldi and Lidl continued to struggle despite reconfi guring their off er to be more acceptable to British palates and shopping demands. From 2008, as the global recession focused consumer attention fi rmly on price, discounters began to grow rapidly. With living standards under threat in a way not seen since the 1930s, the discounters sought to position themselves very diff erently to the (by now) ‘Big 4’. As a consequence, during 2008–2015, market shares for Aldi and Lidl have approached 5 per cent each, and Netto has re-entered the UK in a joint venture with Sainsbury’s. Price, however, is not the only advantage that the discounters have. Their steady store chain expansion over 15-plus years has enabled them to build a dense store network that means their stores are often conveniently located, and certainly more so than the large off -centre hyper- markets. As the British consumer began to value convenience more strongly, so the discounters were able to focus on price and proximity. At a time when personal fi nances were tight and

99781472456052_pi-325.indd781472456052_pi-325.indd 220707 55/12/2016/12/2016 112:44:522:44:52 PPMM 208 Leigh Sparks the cost of fuel was rising rapidly, this proved attractive. In the early 1990s, the threat of the discounter had been fought off by the leading retailers through sound tactics, marketing and strategy. By the late 2000s, their armoury in this regard was threadbare and the multiples were locked into a very diff erent store network base. The convenience store sector in recent years has been seen as a major growth sector for all companies, refl ecting the changed consumer desires and patterns of behaviour (ACS, 2014 ). The signifi cance of convenience had been recognized in the early 2000s by the Co-operative Group and then by Tesco, who embarked on a major takeover spree to build a convenience chain (Tesco Express and One-Stop). Other leading food retailers, with the exception of Sainsbury’s, hesitated, to their detriment. The importance of convenience was only recognized more recently by Morrisons, Waitrose and to an extent Asda. More widely in the convenience market, the affi liated convenience store – such as , Premier, , , etc. – also expanded at the expense of the truly independent store, refl ecting the brand, range and price benefi ts of affi liation. Convenience is also refl ected in the other major change in food supply systems, the rise of the internet and its use as a shopping channel. As with a number of recent retail innova- tions, Tesco were the fi rst to identify and then exploit the potential of the internet. By adopt- ing a store-based order-picking model, Tesco enabled national coverage almost immediately. Competitors, choosing initially a distribution centre-based operation in high-density urban areas alone, were locked into a high-cost situation. Consumers quickly began to accept and then expect an online home delivery shopping service and retailers scrambled to match the Tesco off er. At the same time, however, as Tesco became more successful, it began to see pres- sure on stores in some locations and opted to switch to a dedicated ‘dark store’ picking model in very high-density locations (Fernie and Sparks, 2014 ). There are many who question the profi tability of internet-based food retailing, not least retailers such as Morrisons who were very late to the market. But, there can be little doubt that its convenience and fi t with modern lives has made it a valuable additional channel for consumers. This has been expanded by rapidly growing ‘click and collect’ models, which see customers collecting orders from stores or via specialist collection sites at stores, transport hubs or other locations, rather than only receiving at-home delivery. To an extent, this refl ects the movement of power away from retailers and towards consumers who are now more in control of supply operations than ever before. This internet revolution (see national data of the growth in Figure 14.2 ) has, however, also had two other very important eff ects. First, consumers’ ability to use the internet for the bulk of the food shopping exercise has opened up ‘fi ll-in’ arrangements. This is in part linked to the rise of the convenience store, but has also helped to rejuvenate the role of other local stores and alternative channels such as farmers’ markets and local community stores. If the bulk shop- ping trip is online, then fewer trips to major, larger superstores and hypermarkets are needed, and more local behaviour ensues. Second, the internet enables food producers to deal directly with consumers. In the realm of specialist and high-quality products in particular, this has had a major eff ect, with fresh produce being available nationwide from even quite small produ- cers. As a consequence, the market for local, responsibly sourced products has become more national and more interesting for many consumers and producers.

Food retailing today The post-war story of food retailing in the UK and its spatial-structural change, for a long time was simply about the rise of the supermarket, superstore and the hypermarket. In corporate

99781472456052_pi-325.indd781472456052_pi-325.indd 220808 55/12/2016/12/2016 112:44:522:44:52 PPMM Spatial-structural change in food retailing in the UK 209

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0 2007 JUL 2008 JUL 2009 JUL 2010 JUL 2011 JUL 2012 JUL 2013 JUL 2014 JUL 2006 NOV 2007 NOV 2008 NOV 2009 NOV 2010 NOV 2011 NOV 2012 NOV 2013 NOV 2007 MAR 2008 MAR 2009 MAR 2010 MAR 2011 MAR 2012 MAR 2013 MAR 2014 MAR

Figure 14.2 UK internet retail sales as a percentage of total retail sales Source: ONS retail sales data.

terms, an oligopoly developed, with a single dominant chain at its head, Tesco. Food retailers in the UK are the largest retailers (and some of the largest companies) in the UK and have expanded dramatically over recent decades ( Table 14.2 ). The most recent period, however, has seen a shift in this long-run narrative as consumer capabilities, opportunities and needs changed, stronger competitors emerged and the prevailing model of car-borne, weekly large shopping trips to out-of-town hypermarkets came under threat. With a number of food scares (e.g., BSE, horsemeat, etc.), various high-profi le questioning of the quality and safety of some supermarket food (e.g., the campaign by Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall over cheap chicken and fi sh sourcing/stocks) and the treatment of suppliers (Competition Commission, 2008; House of Commons, 2012 ), there has been a renaissance in local and traceable food products and retailers who provide these. The tectonic plates of food retailing are shifting. While there is a danger of reading too much into this, the Christmas fi gures for 2014 for all the ‘Big 4’ retailers were again poor, in some cases disastrously so. Between January 2014 and February 2015, three of the four CEOs departed, and there is considerable bickering over where the blame lies for this performance. Nowhere is this most keenly felt, but also clearly seen, than in Tesco, who have endured a number of major profi t warnings, declining sales, an accounting scandal focused on their treatment of their suppliers, and announced in April 2015 one of the largest corporate losses in UK history (£6.4 billion). The company’s international (mis)adventures such as Japan, the USA and China have failed and cost billions. The UK store portfolio is out of line with cur- rent consumer demands, and has had to be written down massively in the balance sheet. Job losses at head offi ce and store management have been substantial. Tesco is an illustrative case of the changed UK food retailing landscape. They called a halt to the extremes of the ‘space-race’ for out-of-town stores a couple of years ago, but have now gone further. Existing large stores are being forensically analysed regarding their profi tability and are being closed where necessary, and even built but unopened hypermarkets are being mothballed. Land for stores is being written down or sold off for alternative uses. Even in the convenience market, Tesco is closing some stores and pulling out of some sites in a recognition that the headlong rush into convenience sites cannot be done at any cost. Within stores, the

99781472456052_pi-325.indd781472456052_pi-325.indd 220909 55/12/2016/12/2016 112:44:522:44:52 PPMM 210 Leigh Sparks focus is on raising standards and reducing prices, which is hard to achieve without a strong range edit (reduction in lines) and the closure of space. As with a number of the largest food retailers, Tesco now has too much space, of the wrong type, often in the wrong locations and is struggling to see how some of these sites make a profi t in the changed consumer world of the internet, the discounter and convenience. Food retailing is changing quite considerably and the spatial construction of the past 50 years is coming under sustained questioning, not least through the changed behaviours of consumers. There are other eff ects of the changing patterns that are worth refl ecting on, however. There is little doubt that Aldi and Lidl have brought a focus on price to the market for their quite limited ranges. But there are questions to be raised over the consequences of this single focus on price despite the obvious attractions. It is hard to fi nd products in such stores that could be considered ‘healthy’ in terms of salt and sugar levels and the focus on processed product implied by this. While ‘standard’ retailers are not necessarily paragons of virtue in this regard, the sector has been working towards reductions in content of some ingredients, better and clearer labelling of composition and guidance and the development of specialist ‘healthy’ ranges. This has not been an easy journey but some progress has been made. Retailers’ approaches generally to health and especially tobacco and alcohol have been widely ques- tioned and encouraged the development of legislation to tighten control and reduce demand. There has been less success in positive uptake of healthy foods, although they have expanded. There has also been rising concern more generally about the impact of the recession (and, in the eyes of some, the continued government-enforced policy of targeted austerity) on cer- tain segments of society. While price has become more of a focus for retailers individually and the sector as a whole, there are still increasing numbers marginalized by food poverty. Despite defl ation in food and our abundance of products in stores, food banks have been one of the fastest-growing components of the food supply sector and are at record levels in terms of numbers and usage ( www.trusselltrust.org ). This is an indictment on our food supply chain as a whole, although as ever many are seeking to blame the symptoms and not treat the causes. The focus on price is also drawing attention again to the retailer–supplier relationship. For years this has been controversial and the subject of government inquiries, the develop- ment of codes and now an ombudsman/adjudicator (House of Commons, 2012 ). Evidence on exploitation has been hard to fi nd due to the nature of the relationships and the power imbalance at the point of claim and counter-claim. The Tesco accounting scandal has exposed a number of the practices (Guardian , 2014 ). The response of Tesco and others to the discount- ers is focusing a reassessment on their need for as wide a range of products and suppliers. In some commodities – for example, milk – the price war among the food retailers has seen even further reductions in the price paid to producers and farmers and as a consequence, headlines about the demise of the milk-producing industry in the UK. The media, the government, the retailers and some consumers seem unable to make the necessary linkages between price, quantity and sustainability and ‘value’ as a concept has been eff ectively replaced by ‘cheap’ or ‘low price’. Finally, it is worthwhile refl ecting on the changed locational practices of the food retailing sector. For decades, the pursuit was of out-of-town large superstores and hypermarkets and as a consequence, food retailing became very limited in towns and high streets. The recent changes towards the internet and convenience have questioned such off -centre space but have also led to a redevelopment of food retailing in towns and high streets, around transport and footfall hubs and so on. Some of this has been the typical convenience store of old, some the new-style convenience stores of the major chains. But, other developments have seen the reintroduction of local and craft food retailing into high streets and units vacated by other

99781472456052_pi-325.indd781472456052_pi-325.indd 221010 55/12/2016/12/2016 112:44:522:44:52 PPMM Spatial-structural change in food retailing in the UK 211 food retailers and sectors. While the hypermarket had huge adverse consequences for the numbers of greengrocers, bakers, butchers and fi shmongers, the decline of the hypermarket trip is seeing more interest in the specialist store and its rather diff erent, non-commoditized product (Wrigley and Dolega, 2011 ). In some cases, chains are realizing that they can localize their off er by association with local producers, an example is the award-winning collaboration between the artisanal bakery Breadwinner and the chain of convenience stores in Scotland. There is also a grassroots movement from the local level up, which is seeking to link local producers and/or social approaches with local communities. While at this point their market share is negligible, there appears to be an emerging stream of food retail stores that reject the corporate and large organizational model. Thus stores, sometimes on a local cooperative model, are serving small areas based on integrating small-scale producers at a local level with the immediate community. An example is Dig-In Bruntsfi eld ( www.diginbrunts- fi eld.co.uk ), who describe themselves as ‘a community-owned and supported, not-for-profi t greengrocer in Edinburgh who supply locally-sourced produce and foster community spirit’. Such operations provide a local challenge to the prevailing approaches of food retailing and appear likely to have some local success in the coming years.

Conclusion Food is a major component of consumer spending and of consumer life, and food retailing is a refl ection of the social culture of a community or a country. As society has changed and values alter in importance, so too food retailing refl ect these changes. The professionalization of food retailing and its radical reinvention of the post-war trend provided a dynamic country with the retailing it desired and the product choices it valued. This expansion of possibilities has proved a boon in many ways for many consumers, although it is not without its adverse implications on choice and accessibility, especially in certain locations and for some categories of consumers. But, economies and societies change and values continue to alter. Food retailing in the UK is at the moment on the edge of change with various competing tendencies. How these play out in the coming years will be a fascinating story, subtly (and in some cases not so subtly) confi gured by the decisions of governments (is ‘unhealthy’ food the next tobacco or alcohol?), retailers (can the hypermarket be reinvented?), technology (where can the internet, digital and other technologies take us?) and, of course, consumers (what price/quality balance will become dominant and how do we remove food poverty?). Food retailing is used by each and every one of us and its signifi cance in our lives, and in patterning our lives, cannot be under- estimated. Food retailers’ (re)construction of this market is thus a vital component of our food lives and looks likely to be more diff erentiated than has been the case over the past 60 years.

References ACS ( 2014 ). The Local Shop Report 2014 . Farnborough : ACS. Akehurst , G. ( 1984 ). Operation Checkout: the analysis of oligopolistic behaviour in the UK grocery retail market . Service Industries Journal , 4 , 189 – 242 . Alexander , A. (2015 ). Decision-making authority in British supermarket chains. Business History , 57 (4), 614 – 637 . Beaulac , J. , Kristjansson , E. and Cummins, S. (2009 ). A systematic review of food deserts, 1966–2007). Preventing Chronic Disease , 6 (3): A105 . Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2009/jul/08_0163. htm (accessed 4 May 2015).

99781472456052_pi-325.indd781472456052_pi-325.indd 221111 55/12/2016/12/2016 112:44:522:44:52 PPMM 212 Leigh Sparks Burt , S.L. ( 2000 ). The strategic role of retail brands in British grocery retailing. European Journal of Marketing , 34 (8), 875 – 890 . Burt , S.L. and Davies , K. (2010 ). From the retail brand to the retailer as a brand: themes and issues in retail branding research . International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management , 38 , 865 – 878 . Burt , S.L. and Sparks , L. (1995 ). Understanding the arrival of limited line discount stores in Britain. European Management Journal , 13 , 110 – 119 . Burt , S.L. and Sparks , L. (2001 ). The implications of Wal-Mart’s takeover of Asda. Environment and Planning A , 33 , 1463 – 1487 . Burt , S.L. and Sparks , L. ( 2003 ). Power and competition in the UK retail grocery market. British Journal of Management , 14 (3), 237 – 254 . Burt , S.L. and Sparks , L. ( 2015 ). Retail branding . In F. Dall’Olmo Riley , J. Singh and C. Blankson (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Brand Management . London : Routledge . Cheshire , P. C . , Hilber , C.A.L. and Kaplanis , L. (2015 ). Land use regulation and productivity – land mat- ters: evidence from a UK supermarket chain . Journal of Economic Geography , 15 , 43 – 73 . Clarke , I. (2000 ) Retail power, competition and local consumer choice in the UK grocery sector. European Journal of Marketing , 34 , 975 – 1002 . Clarke , I. , Hallsworth , A. , Jackson , P. , de Kervenoael, R. , Perez del Aguila, R. and Kirkup , M. (2006 ). Retail restructuring and consumer choice. 1. Long term changes in consumer behaviour: Portsmouth 1980–2002 . Environment and Planning A , 38 , 25 – 46 . Clarke , R. , Davies , S. , Dobson , P. and Waterson , M. ( 2002 ). Buyer Power and Competition in European Food Retailing . Cheltenham : Edward Elgar . Competition Commission ( 2000 ). Supermarkets: A Report on the Supply of Groceries from Multiple Stores in the United Kingdom . London : TSO . Retrieved from www.competitioncommission.org.uk/inquiries/ completed/2000/index.htm . Competition Commission ( 2006 ). Groceries Market Investigation: Issues Statement . London : TSO . Retrieved from www.competitioncommission.org.uk/inquiries/ref2006/grocery/index.htm. Competition Commission (2008 ). Groceries Market Investigation: Provisional Decision on Remedies . London : Competition Commission. Retrieved from www.competition-commission.org.uk . Dawson , J.A. ( 1988 ). Futures for the high street , The Geographical Journal , 154 (1), 1 – 12 . Dawson , J.A. (2000 ). Viewpoint: retailer power, manufacturer power, competition and some questions of economic analysis . International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management , 28 (1), 1 – 4 . Dobson , P. and Waterson , M. ( 1999 ). Retailer power: recent developments and policy implications . Economic Policy , 28 , 135 – 164 . Donald , B. ( 2013 ). Food retail and access after the crash: rethinking the food desert problem. Journal of Economic Geography , 13 , 231 – 237 . Fernie , J. and Sparks , L. (eds.) ( 2014 ). Logistics and Retail Management , 4th edn. London : Kogan Page . Findlay, A.M. and Sparks , L. (2014 ). High streets and town centres policy . In N. Wrigley and E. Brookes (eds.), Evolving High Streets: Resilience and Reinvention . Southampton : ESRC/University of Southampton , pp. 12 – 15 . Griffi th , R. and Harmgart , H. (2012 ). Supermarkets competition in and planning regulation . International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research , 22 , 1 – 25 . Guardian (2014 ). Tesco and PWC face fresh inquiry over £253m overstatement of profi ts. The Guardian , 22 December. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/business/2014/dec/22/tesco-pwc- inquiry-accountancy-watchdog-profi t-overstatement . Guy , C.M. ( 2010 ). Development pressure and retail planning: a study of 20 year change in Cardiff , UK . International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research , 20 , 1, 119 – 133 . Guy , C.M. and Bennison , D. ( 2007 ). Planning guidance and large store development in the UK: the search for ‘fl exibility’. Environment and Planning A , 39 , 945 – 964 . Hallsworth , A. ( 2010 ). Small shop decline; shadow boxing in the dark. Environment and Planning A , 42 , 1258 – 1263 . Hallsworth , A. , de Kervenoel , R. , Elms , J. and Canning , C. ( 2010 ). The food superstore revolution: chang- ing times, changing research agendas in the UK. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research , 20 , 135 – 146 .

99781472456052_pi-325.indd781472456052_pi-325.indd 221212 55/12/2016/12/2016 112:44:522:44:52 PPMM Spatial-structural change in food retailing in the UK 213 House of Commons (2012 ). Supermarkets: competition inquiries into the groceries market. Commons Library Standard Note , SN03653 . Hughes, R. , Hallsworth , A. and Clarke , G. ( 2009 ). Testing the eff ectiveness of the proposed UK ‘compe- tition test ’. Service Industries Journal , 29 , 569 – 590 . Humby, C. , Hunt , H. and Phillips , T. (2003 ). Scoring Points: How Tesco is Winning Customer Loyalty . London : Kogan Page . IGD (2014 ). UK grocery retailing. Retrieved from http://igd.com/Research/Retail/retail-outlook/3371/ UK-Grocery-retailing . Jackson , P. , Perez del Aguila, R. , Clarke , I. , Hallsworth , A. , Kervenoael de, R. and Kirkup, M. (2006 ). Retail restructuring and consumer choice 2: understanding consumer choice at the household level . Environment and Planning A , 38 , 47 – 67 . Kynaston , D. ( 2007 ). Austerity Britain 1945–51 . London : Bloomsbury . Kynaston , D. ( 2009 ). Family Britain 1951–57 . London : Bloomsbury . Kynaston , D. ( 2014 ). Modernity Britain 1957–62 . London : Bloomsbury . Marsden , T. and Wrigley , N. ( 2006 ). Retailing, the food system and the regulatory state. In N. Wrigley and M. Lowe (eds.), Retailing, Consumption and Capital: Towards the New Retail Geography . London : Longman , pp. 33 – 47 . Mercer , H. (2014 ). Retailer–supplier relationships before and after the Resale Prices Act: 1964: A turn- ing point in British economic history? Enterprise & Society , 15 (1), 132 – 165 . Murcott , A. (ed.) ( 1991 ). The Nation’s Diet: The Social Science of Food Choice . London : Longman . Ryle , S. ( 2013 ). The Making of Tesco . London : Bantam Press . Seth , A. and Randall , G. ( 1999 ). The Grocers: The Rise and Rise of the Supermarket Chains . London : Kogan Page . Seth , A. and Randall , G. ( 2005 ). Supermarket Wars: Global Strategies for Food Retailers . Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan . Sparks , L. ( 1996 ). Space wars: Wm Low and the auld enemy. Environment and Planning A , 28 , 1465 – 1484 . Sparks , L. ( 2010 ). Supply chain management and retailing . Supply Chain Forum, 11 , 4, 4 – 12 . Sparks , L. (2011 ). Settling for second best: refl ections on the tenth anniversary of Wal-Mart’s entry to the UK . International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management , 39 (2), 114 – 129 . Wood , S. and McCarthy , D. ( 2014 ). The UK food retail ‘race for space’ and market saturation; a contem- porary review . International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research , 24 , 121 – 144 . Wood , S. , Lowe, M. and Wrigley , N. ( 2006 ). Life after PPG6: recent food retailer responses to planning regulation tightening . International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research , 16 , 23 – 41 . Wrigley, N. (1987 ). The concentration of capital in UK grocery retailing. Environment & Planning A . 19 , 1283 – 1288 . Wrigley, N. (2002 ). ‘Food deserts’ in British cities: policy context and research priorities. Urban Studies , 39 : 2029 – 2040 . Wrigley, N. and Brookes , E. (eds.) ( 2014 ). Evolving High Streets: Resilience and Reinvention . Southampton : ESRC/University of Southampton . Wrigley, N. and Dolega , L. (2011 ). Resilience, fragility, and adaptation: new evidence on the perfor- mance of UK high streets during global economic crisis and its policy implications . Environment and Planning A , 43 , 2337 – 2363 .

99781472456052_pi-325.indd781472456052_pi-325.indd 221313 55/12/2016/12/2016 112:44:522:44:52 PPMM