A Appendix: Radiometry and Photometry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Appendix: Radiometry and Photometry A Appendix: Radiometry and Photometry This appendix deals with the photometric and radiometric variables that are useful in setting and understanding problems about color and energy exchange. All eletromagnetic radiation transfers energy, called radiant energy. Radiometry is the science of the measurement of the physical variables as- sociated with the propagation and exchange of radiant energy. Photometry is the branch of radiometry that deals with these variables from the viewpoint of visual responses; that is, it studies how radiant energy is perceived by an observer. Thus, radiometry in general deals with physical processes, while photometry deals with psychophysical ones. A.1 Radiometry Although an understanding of the physics of electromagnetic waves is impor- tant in the study of light–matter interaction, we need not be concerned with the nature of electromagnetism in the study of radiometry and photometry. It is enough to know that radiant energy flows through space; the fundamental variable involved is the flux through a surface, that is, the rate at which radi- ant energy is transferred through a surface. This notion is therefore analogous to the notion of an electric current or to the flow of matter in fluid dynamics. In contrast with the situation in fluid dynamics, however, there exist point sources of radiant energy, and indeed they are of great importance in radio- metry. To define the radiometric variables associated with point sources, we introduce the notion of solid angles. Solid Angles In the plane, angles can be regarded as a measure of apparent length from an observer’s viewpoint. To compute the angle subtended by an object when 440 A Appendix: Radiometry and Photometry Fig. A.1. Angles and radial projection. observed from a point O, we project the object radially onto the unit circle centered at O and measure the arc determined by this projection; this is how big the object looks to someone stationed at O (Figure A.1). We can also use a circle of radius other than 1, but in this case we must divide the length of the projected arc by the radius of the circle. Thus, angles are dimensionless quantities. Radians and other units of angle measurement are a notational device to avoid confusion when working with such measure- ments: a radian is simply the number 1; a degree is the number π/180; and so on. This way of looking at angles can be extended to higher dimensions, leading to the definition of a solid angle, that is, a measurement of the apparent area as seen from a point. Consider a subset A of space and a viewpoint O.The solid angle ω determined by A (with respect to O) is the area of the radial projection of A onto the unit sphere centered at O, which we call the visual sphere (Figure A.2). As in the plane case, we can take as the visual sphere Fig. A.2. Measuring a solid angle. A.1 Radiometry 441 a sphere of arbitrary radius r = 1, but then we must divide the area of the projection by the square of the radius. Thus, the solid angle is given by Area(A) ω = . (A.1) r2 The radial projection of A onto the visual sphere determines a cone with vertex O and base A, that is, the solid formed by all the rays (half-lines) in space starting at O and going through points of A (Figure A.3). The solid angle defined by (A.1) can also be regarded as a measurement of this cone. Two subsets of the plane that subtend the same angle (from a fixed point of view O) are called perceptually congruent (with respect to O); this is illustrated in Figure A.4, left. Similarly, subsets of space that determine the same cone (or, which is the same, the same projection on the visual sphere) are called perceptually congruent; see Figure A.4, right. Since (A.1) is a ratio of two areas, solid angles are dimensionless. However, just as in the case of plane angles, it is comforting to be able to use a unit when Fig. A.3. Cone with vertex O and base A. Fig. A.4. Perceptual congruence. 442 A Appendix: Radiometry and Photometry Fig. A.5. Element of solid angle. discussing measurements of solid angles. The standard unit, representing the number 1, is the steradian, abbreviated sr. The whole visual sphere has solid angle 4π sr, since the area of a sphere of radius r is 4πr2. When integrating over the visual sphere (or part thereof), we will consider an infinitesimal element of solid angle dω. Pictorially, we represent dω by a vector pointing radially away from O; see Figure A.5. A.1.1 Radiometric Magnitudes Suppose a light bulb is turned on, left on for a while, then turned off. There are several measurements that one might be interested in: the total energy emitted by the bulb during this period; the energy emitted per second; the energy that reaches a certain target; the brightness as seen from that target; and so on. Radiant Flux The total energy emitted is denoted by Qe, and it is measured in units of energy: joules in the MKS system. The radiant flux Φe is the rate at which energy is being emitted: dQ Φ = e . e dt In the MKS system it is measured in joules per second, also known as watts. Irradiance The energy emitted by the light source can also be considered to be going through a closed surface surrounding the source, so it makes sense to consider the flux density—that is, flux per unit area—at points of such a closed surface. Flux density, also called irradiance and denoted Ee, is vector-valued: given a point P and an element of surface containing P ,havingareadA, the flux through that surface element is Ee cos θdA, where Ee is the magnitude of the irradiance vector at P and θ is the angle between the irradiance vector and the normal to the area element (see Figure A.6, where the flux through the A.1 Radiometry 443 Fig. A.6. The amount of radiant energy crossing a surface per unit time depends on which way the surface faces. surface is negative on the left, zero in the middle, and positive on the right). Loosely, we can write dΦ E = e . e dA Irradiance is measured (in the MKS system) in watts per square meter. Radiant Intensity The irradiance depends, of course, on how far the point of measurement is from the source (and usually also on the direction as seen from the source). It is often useful to work instead with a magnitude that is associated with the source itself. For a point light source, this is easy: we just consider flux per solid angle instead of flux per area. The radiant intensity Ie of a point source is defined as dΦ I = e , e dω where dω is the element of solid angle as seen from the source and is measured in watts per steradian. (Note that this does not make sense unless the light source has negligible extension, since the notion of solid angle depends essen- tially on the choice of an origin.) The radiant intensity is a function of the direction as seen from the source. When we integrate it over all directions, we recover the total flux, Φe = Iedω. For a source that sheds light uniformly in all directions, Ie is constant and Φe =4πIe. Clearly, the flux density an observer perceives at a distance d from the 2 source is Ee = Ie/d . Radiance This concept can be adapted to the case of nonpoint light sources, as follows. Consider a surface S that delimits the source in question—the surface of a light bulb, say, or a sphere around it. (The light need not be generated on S; it is the flux through S that concerns us.) If we take an element of the surface, of area dA, we can regard it as a point source and look at its radiant intensity 444 A Appendix: Radiometry and Photometry Fig. A.7. Radiance of a light source. dIe in a certain direction. The ratio dIe/dA is the density of radiant intensity at the given point of the source surface, in the given direction. Actually, we must take into account that the area of the surface element as seen from the chosen direction is not dA, but dA cos θ, where θ is as in Figure A.7. This leads us to the following definition: the radiance (not to be confused with the irradiance defined earlier) is dI d2Φ L = e = e . e dA cos θ dω dA cos θ We stress that this is a function of the chosen point P on the source surface S and of the chosen direction as seen from P . (In mathematical terms, it is a function on the unit tangent bundle to S.) Radiance is measured in watts per square meter per steradian. Integrating the radiance over the points of the source gives the flux density. More precisely, Le(P, u)cosθdA Ee = uP 2 , S r where P ranges over the surface S, u is the unit vector in the direction from P to the observer, θ is the angle between u and the normal to S at P ,and r is the distance from P to the observer. This equation is a generalization of 2 the earlier formula Ee = Ie/d for point sources. A.1.2 Spectral Distribution So far we have ignored the fact that light is composed of many wavelengths.
Recommended publications
  • CIE Technical Note 004:2016
    TECHNICAL NOTE The Use of Terms and Units in Photometry – Implementation of the CIE System for Mesopic Photometry CIE TN 004:2016 CIE TN 004:2016 CIE Technical Notes (TN) are short technical papers summarizing information of fundamental importance to CIE Members and other stakeholders, which either have been prepared by a TC, in which case they will usually form only a part of the outputs from that TC, or through the auspices of a Reportership established for the purpose in response to a need identified by a Division or Divisions. This Technical Note has been prepared by CIE Technical Committee 2-65 of Division 2 “Physical Measurement of Light and Radiation" and has been approved by the Board of Administration as well as by Division 2 of the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. The document reports on current knowledge and experience within the specific field of light and lighting described, and is intended to be used by the CIE membership and other interested parties. It should be noted, however, that the status of this document is advisory and not mandatory. Any mention of organizations or products does not imply endorsement by the CIE. Whilst every care has been taken in the compilation of any lists, up to the time of going to press, these may not be comprehensive. CIE 2016 - All rights reserved II CIE, All rights reserved CIE TN 004:2016 The following members of TC 2-65 “Photometric measurements in the mesopic range“ took part in the preparation of this Technical Note. The committee comes under Division 2 “Physical measurement of light and radiation”.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Symbols and Prefixes
    Appendix A: Symbols and Prefixes (Appendix A last revised November 2020) This appendix of the Author's Kit provides recommendations on prefixes, unit symbols and abbreviations, and factors for conversion into units of the International System. Prefixes Recommended prefixes indicating decimal multiples or submultiples of units and their symbols are as follows: Multiple Prefix Abbreviation 1024 yotta Y 1021 zetta Z 1018 exa E 1015 peta P 1012 tera T 109 giga G 106 mega M 103 kilo k 102 hecto h 10 deka da 10-1 deci d 10-2 centi c 10-3 milli m 10-6 micro μ 10-9 nano n 10-12 pico p 10-15 femto f 10-18 atto a 10-21 zepto z 10-24 yocto y Avoid using compound prefixes, such as micromicro for pico and kilomega for giga. The abbreviation of a prefix is considered to be combined with the abbreviation/symbol to which it is directly attached, forming with it a new unit symbol, which can be raised to a positive or negative power and which can be combined with other unit abbreviations/symbols to form abbreviations/symbols for compound units. For example: 1 cm3 = (10-2 m)3 = 10-6 m3 1 μs-1 = (10-6 s)-1 = 106 s-1 1 mm2/s = (10-3 m)2/s = 10-6 m2/s Abbreviations and Symbols Whenever possible, avoid using abbreviations and symbols in paragraph text; however, when it is deemed necessary to use such, define all but the most common at first use. The following is a recommended list of abbreviations/symbols for some important units.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundametals of Rendering - Radiometry / Photometry
    Fundametals of Rendering - Radiometry / Photometry “Physically Based Rendering” by Pharr & Humphreys •Chapter 5: Color and Radiometry •Chapter 6: Camera Models - we won’t cover this in class 782 Realistic Rendering • Determination of Intensity • Mechanisms – Emittance (+) – Absorption (-) – Scattering (+) (single vs. multiple) • Cameras or retinas record quantity of light 782 Pertinent Questions • Nature of light and how it is: – Measured – Characterized / recorded • (local) reflection of light • (global) spatial distribution of light 782 Electromagnetic spectrum 782 Spectral Power Distributions e.g., Fluorescent Lamps 782 Tristimulus Theory of Color Metamers: SPDs that appear the same visually Color matching functions of standard human observer International Commision on Illumination, or CIE, of 1931 “These color matching functions are the amounts of three standard monochromatic primaries needed to match the monochromatic test primary at the wavelength shown on the horizontal scale.” from Wikipedia “CIE 1931 Color Space” 782 Optics Three views •Geometrical or ray – Traditional graphics – Reflection, refraction – Optical system design •Physical or wave – Dispersion, interference – Interaction of objects of size comparable to wavelength •Quantum or photon optics – Interaction of light with atoms and molecules 782 What Is Light ? • Light - particle model (Newton) – Light travels in straight lines – Light can travel through a vacuum (waves need a medium to travel in) – Quantum amount of energy • Light – wave model (Huygens): electromagnetic radiation: sinusiodal wave formed coupled electric (E) and magnetic (H) fields 782 Nature of Light • Wave-particle duality – Light has some wave properties: frequency, phase, orientation – Light has some quantum particle properties: quantum packets (photons). • Dimensions of light – Amplitude or Intensity – Frequency – Phase – Polarization 782 Nature of Light • Coherence - Refers to frequencies of waves • Laser light waves have uniform frequency • Natural light is incoherent- waves are multiple frequencies, and random in phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Scaling Lightness Perception and Differences Above and Below Diffuse White and Modifying Color Spaces for High-Dynamic-Range Scenes and Images Ping-Hsu Chen
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses Thesis/Dissertation Collections 2011 Scaling lightness perception and differences above and below diffuse white and modifying color spaces for high-dynamic-range scenes and images Ping-hsu Chen Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses Recommended Citation Chen, Ping-hsu, "Scaling lightness perception and differences above and below diffuse white and modifying color spaces for high- dynamic-range scenes and images" (2011). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Scaling Lightness Perception and Differences Above and Below Diffuse White and Modifying Color Spaces for High-Dynamic-Range Scenes and Images by Ping-hsu Chen B.S. Shih Hsin University, Taipei, Taiwan (2001) M.S. Shih Hsin University, Taipei, Taiwan (2003) A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Color Science in the Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology Signature of the Author Accepted By Coordinator, M.S. Degree Program Data CHESTER F. CARLSON CENTER FOR IMAGING SCIENCE COLLEE OF SCIENCE ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROCHESTER, NY CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL M.S. DEGREE THESIS The M.S. Degree Thesis of Ping-hsu Chen has been examined and approved by two members of the Color Science faculty as satisfactory for the thesis requirement for the Master of Science degree Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Methodology for Analyzing the Color Content of a Selected Group of Printed Color Analysis Systems
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Edith E. Collin for the degree of Master of Sciencein Clothing, Textiles and Related Arts presented on April 7, 1986. Title: Development of a Methodology for Analyzing theColor Content of a Selected Group of Printed Color Analysis Systems Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: Ardis Koester The purpose of this study was to develop amethodology to compare the color choice recommendationsfor each personal color analysis category identified by the authorsof selected publications. The procedure used included: (1) identification of publications with color analysis systemsdirected toward female clientele; (2) comparison of number and names of categoriesused; (3) identification, by use of Munsell colornotations, the visual and written color recommendations ascribed toeach category; and (4) comparison of the publications on the basisof: (a) number and names of categories; (b) numberof color recommendations in each category; (c) range of hue value and chroma presented;(d) comparison of visual and written color recommendations by categoryand author. With the exception of comparison of publications onthe basis of written color recommendations, all components of themethodology were successful. Comparison of the publications used in development ofthe methodology revealed that: 1. The majority of authors use the seasonal category system. 2. The number of color recommendations per category was quite consistent within a publication but varied widely among authors. 3. There were few similarities in color recommendations even among authors using the same name categories. 4. There was poor agreement between written and visual color recommendations within all color categories. 5. There was no discernable theoretical basis for the color recommendations presented by any author included in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Color Measurement1 Agr1c Ü8 ,
    I A^w /\PK4 1946 USDA COLOR MEASUREMENT1 AGR1C ü8 , ,. 2001 DEC-1 f=> 7=50 AndA ItsT ApplicationA rL '"NT SERIAL Í to the Grading of Agricultural Products A HANDBOOK ON THE METHOD OF DISK COLORIMETRY ui By S3 DOROTHY NICKERSON, Color Technologist, Producdon and Marketing Administration 50! es tt^iSi as U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Miscellaneous Publication 580 March 1946 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Color-grading problems 1 Color charts in grading work 2 Transparent-color standards in grading work 3 Standards need measuring 4 Several methods of expressing results of color measurement 5 I.C.I, method of color notation 6 Homogeneous-heterogeneous method of color notation 6 Munsell method of color notation 7 Relation between methods 9 Disk colorimetry 10 Early method 22 Present method 22 Instruments 23 Choice of disks 25 Conversion to Munsell notation 37 Application of disk colorimetry to grading problems 38 Sample preparation 38 Preparation of conversion data 40 Applications of Munsell notations in related problems 45 The Kelly mask method for color matching 47 Standard names for colors 48 A.S.A. standard for the specification and description of color 50 Color-tolerance specifications 52 Artificial daylighting for grading work 53 Color-vision testing 59 Literature cited 61 666177—46- COLOR MEASUREMENT And Its Application to the Grading of Agricultural Products By DOROTHY NICKERSON, color technologist Production and Marketing Administration INTRODUCTION cotton, hay, butter, cheese, eggs, fruits and vegetables (fresh, canned, frozen, and dried), honey, tobacco, In the 16 years since publication of the disk method 3 1 cereal grains, meats, and rosin.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Area on Color Harmony in Interior Spaces
    EFFECT OF AREA ON COLOR HARMONY IN INTERIOR SPACES A Ph.D. Dissertation by SEDEN ODABAŞIOĞLU Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara June 2015 To my parents EFFECT OF AREA ON COLOR HARMONY IN INTERIOR SPACES Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by SEDEN ODABAŞIOĞLU In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA June 2015 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Interior Architecture and Environmental Design. --------------------------------- Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nilgün Olguntürk Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Interior Architecture and Environmental Design. --------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Halime Demirkan Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Interior Architecture and Environmental Design. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Dr. Katja Doerschner Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Interior Architecture and Environmental Design. --------------------------------- Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sezin Tanrıöver Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Interior Architecture and Environmental Design.
    [Show full text]
  • Variable Star Photometry with a DSLR Camera
    Variable star photometry with a DSLR camera Des Loughney Introduction now be studied. I have used the method to create lightcurves of stars with an amplitude of under 0.2 magnitudes. In recent years it has been found that a digital single lens reflex (DSLR) camera is capable of accurate unfiltered pho- tometry as well as V-filter photometry.1 Undriven cameras, Equipment with appropriate quality lenses, can do photometry down to magnitude 10. Driven cameras, using exposures of up to 30 seconds, can allow photometry to mag 12. Canon 350D/450D DSLR cameras are suitable for photome- The cameras are not as sensitive or as accurate as CCD try. My experiments suggest that the cameras should be cameras primarily because they are not cooled. They do, used with quality lenses of at least 50mm aperture. This however, share some of the advantages of a CCD as they allows sufficient light to be gathered over the range of have a linear response over a large portion of their range1 exposures that are possible with an undriven camera. For and their digital data can be accepted by software pro- bright stars (over mag 3) lenses of smaller aperture can be grammes such as AIP4WIN.2 They also have their own ad- used. I use two excellent Canon lenses of fixed focal length. vantages as their fields of view are relatively large. This makes One is the 85mm f1.8 lens which has an aperture of 52mm. variable stars easy to find and an image can sometimes in- This allows undriven photometry down to mag 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Introduction to Stellar Photometry
    Chapter 4 Introduction to stellar photometry Goal-of-the-Day Understand the concept of stellar photometry and how it can be measured from astro- nomical observations. 4.1 Essential preparation Exercise 4.1 (a) Have a look at www.astro.keele.ac.uk/astrolab/results/week03/week03.pdf. 4.2 Fluxes and magnitudes Photometry is a technique in astronomy concerned with measuring the brightness of an astronomical object’s electromagnetic radiation. This brightness of a star is given by the flux F : the photon energy which passes through a unit of area within a unit of time. The flux density, Fν or Fλ, is the flux per unit of frequency or per unit of wavelength, respectively: these are related to each other by: Fνdν = Fλdλ (4.1) | | | | Whilst the total light output from a star — the bolometric luminosity — is linked to the flux, measurements of a star’s brightness are usually obtained within a limited frequency or wavelength range (the photometric band) and are therefore more directly linked to the flux density. Because the measured flux densities of stars are often weak, especially at infrared and radio wavelengths where the photons are not very energetic, the flux density is sometimes expressed in Jansky, where 1 Jy = 10−26 W m−2 Hz−1. However, it is still very common to express the brightness of a star by the ancient clas- sification of magnitude. Around 120 BC, the Greek astronomer Hipparcos ordered stars in six classes, depending on the moment at which these stars became first visible during evening twilight: the brightest stars were of the first class, and the faintest stars were of the sixth class.
    [Show full text]
  • Photometric Calibrations —————————————————————————
    NIST Special Publication 250-37 NIST MEASUREMENT SERVICES: PHOTOMETRIC CALIBRATIONS ————————————————————————— Yoshihiro Ohno Optical Technology Division Physics Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Supersedes SP250-15 Reprint with changes July 1997 ————————————————————————— U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE William M. Daley, Secretary Technology Administration Gary R. Bachula, Acting Under Secretary for Technology National Institute of Standards and Technology Robert E. Hebner, Acting Director PREFACE The calibration and related measurement services of the National Institute of Standards and Technology are intended to assist the makers and users of precision measuring instruments in achieving the highest possible levels of accuracy, quality, and productivity. NIST offers over 300 different calibrations, special tests, and measurement assurance services. These services allow customers to directly link their measurement systems to measurement systems and standards maintained by NIST. These services are offered to the public and private organizations alike. They are described in NIST Special Publication (SP) 250, NIST Calibration Services Users Guide. The Users Guide is supplemented by a number of Special Publications (designated as the “SP250 Series”) that provide detailed descriptions of the important features of specific NIST calibration services. These documents provide a description of the: (1) specifications for the services; (2) design philosophy and theory; (3) NIST measurement system; (4) NIST operational procedures; (5) assessment of the measurement uncertainty including random and systematic errors and an error budget; and (6) internal quality control procedures used by NIST. These documents will present more detail than can be given in NIST calibration reports, or than is generally allowed in articles in scientific journals. In the past, NIST has published such information in a variety of ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Basics of Photometry Photometry: Basic Questions
    Basics of Photometry Photometry: Basic Questions • How do you identify objects in your image? • How do you measure the flux from an object? • What are the potential challenges? • Does it matter what type of object you’re studying? Topics 1. General Considerations 2. Stellar Photometry 3. Galaxy Photometry I: General Considerations 1. Garbage in, garbage out... 2. Object Detection 3. Centroiding 4. Measuring Flux 5. Background Flux 6. Computing the noise and correlated pixel statistics I: General Considerations • Object Detection How do you mathematically define where there’s an object? I: General Considerations • Object Detection – Define a detection threshold and detection area. An object is only detected if it has N pixels above the threshold level. – One simple example of a detection algorithm: • Generate a segmentation image that includes only pixels above the threshold. • Identify each group of contiguous pixels, and call it an object if there are more than N contiguous pixels I: General Considerations • Object Detection I: General Considerations • Object Detection Measuring Flux in an Image • How do you measure the flux from an object? • Within what area do you measure the flux? The best approach depends on whether you are looking at resolved or unresolved sources. Background (Sky) Flux • Background – The total flux that you measure (F) is the sum of the flux from the object (I) and the sky (S). F = I + S = #Iij + npix " sky / pixel – Must accurately determine the level of the background to obtaining meaningful photometry ! (We’ll return to this a bit later.) Photometric Errors Issues impacting the photometric uncertainties: • Poisson Error – Recall that the statistical uncertainty is Poisson in electrons rather than ADU.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Code and Title: H01RS Residential Space Designing Module Code and Name: H01RS19 Light – Measurement, Related Terms and Units Name of the Content Writer: Dr
    Paper Code and Title: H01RS Residential Space Designing Module Code and Name: H01RS19 Light – measurement, related terms and units Name of the Content Writer: Dr. S. Visalakshi Rajeswari LIGHT – MEASUREMENT, RELATED TERMS AND UNITS Introduction Light is that part of the electromagnetic spectrum which will stimulate a response in the receptors of the eye. Its frequency usually expressed as wavelength determines the colour of light and its amplitude determines its intensity. Accommodation from the individual’s part enables focusing of vision. Hence the need to study lighting in interiors. Especially when activities are carried out indoors it is necessary to provide some sort of artificial illumination. In such circumstances, the designer should be aware of what (lighting) is provided and the satisfaction the ‘user’ derives out of it. 1. The radiant energy spectrum Vs visible spectrum Light is visually evaluated radiant energy (electromagnetic), which moves at a constant speed in vacuum. The entire radiant energy spectrum consists of waves of radiant energy that vary in wavelength of a wide range; an array of all rays - cosmic, gamma, UV, infra red, radar, x rays, the visible spectrum, FM, TV- and radio broadcast waves and power transmission. The portion of the radiant energy which is seen as light, identified as the spectrum visible to the human eye ranges from about 380 (400) to 780 (700) mµ (referred to as nanometers or millimicrons). A nanometer (nm) is a unit of wavelength equal to 10 -9 m. Light can thus be thought of as the aspect of radiant energy that is visible. Colour perception is attributed to the varying wavelengths noticeable within the spectrum of visible light.
    [Show full text]