DOCSLIB.ORG

The AI for Good Global Summit Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The AI for Good Global Summit Program The AI for Good Global Summit Program DAY 1 – Wednesday, June 7 08.00- High-level Networking breakfast 09.30 09.30- Welcome Address 10.00 António Guterres (invited), Secretary-General, United Nations Houlin Zhao, Secretary General, ITU Marcus Shingles, CEO, XPRIZE Foundation 10.00- Moonshots 10.45 Inaugural moonshot keynote: Rupert Stadler, CEO and Chairman of the Board of Management, AUDI AG Inspirations about the future: Yoshua Bengio, Head, Montreal Institute for Learning Algorithms (MILA) Jürgen Schmidhuber, Scientific Director, Swiss AI Lab, IDSIA; Professor of AI, USI & SUPSI, Switzerland; President of NNAISENSE Moderator: Zenia Tata, Global International Development, XPRIZE (tbc) 10.45- coffee break 11.15 11.15- [PLENARY 1] State of play of AI 12.45 Margaret Chan, Director General, World Health Organization Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, OHCHR Peter Lee, Corporate Vice President of Microsoft AI and Research, Microsoft Francesca Rossi, Research Scientist, IBM Watson and Professor of Computer Science, University of Padova Gary Marcus, Professor of Psychology and Neural Science, New York University Moderator: Gary Marcus, Professor of Psychology and Neural Science, New York University 12.45- lunch break 14.00 14.00- [PLENARY 2] AI transformations on the horizon 15.30 Robert Kirkpatrick, Director, UN Global Pulse Eric Horvitz, Technical Fellow and Managing Director, Microsoft Research Vicki Hanson, President, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Jaan Tallinn, Co-Founder, Future of Life Institute [tentative] Salil Shetty, Secretary General, Amnesty International Moderator: Urs Gasser, Executive Director of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University 15.30- coffee break 16.00 16.00- [PLENARY 3] Future AI roadmap – a chance to get it right 18.00 Speakers: Lan Xue, Cheung Kong Chaired Professor and Dean of School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University Manuela Veloso, Professor in Computer Science and Robotics, Carnegie Mellon University Frank La Rue, Assistant Director-General, UNESCO Cindy Smith, Director, United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI) Panel: Chris Fabian, Co-Founder, UNICEF Innovation Nadia Isler, Director, Sustainable Development Goal Lab, United Nations Office at Geneva (UNOG) ITU XPRIZE Co-Moderators: ▪ Nicholas Davis, Head of Society and Innovation, World Economic Forum ▪ Anja Kaspersen, Head of Strategic Engagement and New Technologies, ICRC 18.30- Welcome Dinner (tour and dinner at the United Nations Office in Geneva) 21.00 DAY 2 – Thursday, June 8 09.00- [PLENARY 4] Privacy, Security, Ethics and Societal Challenges 10.00 Joe Konstan, Professor, University of Minnesota Lynne Parker, Professor, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Co-lead of task force task force that created the U.S. National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan. Mady Delvaux-Stehres, Member of the European Parliament David Hanson, Founder and CEO, Hanson Robotics (demo) Moderator: Mike Hinchey, President, International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) 10.00- Coffee break 10.30 10.30- Breakthrough Groups on Privacy and Ethics Breakthrough Groups on Societal Challenges 12.00 Ethical development of Future of Work Humans and Enhancing Privacy and AI Machines Security Lead: ILO, UNIDO Lead: UNESCO, OHCHR, Lead: UNESCO, Lead: OHCHR, UNICRI, Moderator: Jason Global Pulse Joseph Konstan, Global Pulse Williamson, Executive University of ▪ Francesca Rossi, Director of Special ▪ Brian Witten, Sr Minnesota Research Scientist, IBM Projects, XPRIZE Director, Symantec Research Labs, ▪ Konstantinos ▪ Yin Qi, Founder Symantec [tentative] Karachalios, Managing Director, IEEE Standards ▪ Ekkehard Ernst, Chief of and CEO, Megvii ▪ Jean-Luc Lemahieu, Association the Macroeconomic (Face++) policies and Jobs Unit, ILO Strategic Planning and ▪ Jean Ponce, Professor Interagency Affairs and Head of research ▪ Ms Irmgard Nubler, Unit, UNODC AI, Ecole Normale Senior economist, ILO Superieure ▪ Hongjian Zhang, ▪ (Expert proposed by Managing Director of ▪ Wendell Wallach, UNIDO) ByteDance Technical Chair Technology & Strategy Research Ethics Study Group, ISPS Center OR other Interdisciplinary Center expert proposed by for Bioethics, Yale UNICRI) University ▪ (Expert proposed by ▪ Peggy Hicks, Director UNESCO) of Thematic Engagement, Special Procedures and Right to Development, OHCHR • Tomaso Falchetta, Privacy International [proposed by OHCHR] •Marc Latonero, Data & Society [proposed by OHCHR] 12.00- Lunch break 13.30 13.30- [PLENARY 5] ‘Breakthrough’ proposals on privacy, security, ethics and societal challenges 14.00 Moderator: 14.00- [PLENARY 6] Common Good and Sustainable Living 15.00 Fei-Fei Li, Director, Stanford Artificial Intelligence Lab (SAIL) Antoine Blondeau, Chairman, Sentient Stephen Cave, Executive Director, Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence P. Anandan, Vice President for Research, Adobe Moderator/speaker: Thomas Wiegand, Executive Director, Fraunhofer Heinrich Hertz Institute and Professor, TU Berlin 15.00- Coffee break 15.30 15.30- Breakthrough Groups on Common Good Breakthrough Groups on Sustainable Living 17.00 AI for Prosperity Social Good Data Promoting Healthier Smart Cities and Citizens Communities Lead: Yoshua Bengio, Lead: UN Global Pulse Montreal Institute for Lead: WHO, UNESCO Lead: ITU, UNIDO Moderator, co-lead: Learning Algorithms Eric Horvitz, Technical Fellow and Managing ▪ Dhesi Br, Co-Founder, Moderator: Frits Director, Microsoft AIME (Artificial Bussemaker, Research Intelligence in Medical Secretary General Epidemiology) International relations and ▪ (Expert proposed by Partner, CIONET UNESCO) ▪ (Expert proposed by UNIDO) 17:00- [PLENARY 7] ‘Breakthrough‘ proposals on common good and sustainable living 17:30 Moderator: 19:00- Reception 20:30 DAY 3 – Friday, June 9 09.00- [PLENARY 8] Capacity Building and Poverty Reduction 10.00 Pedro Domingos, Professor of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington (remote) Anders Sandberg, James Martin Research Fellow, Future of Humanity Institute, at University of Oxford Neil Sahota, World Wide Business Development Leader, IBM Watson UN designate Speaker: Olly Buston, Founder, Future Advocacy 10.00- Coffee break 10.30 10.30- Breakthrough Groups on Poverty Breakthrough Groups on Capacity Building 12.00 Reduction Ending Hunger Disaster Education Promoting equality in Prevention and AI Lead: UNICEF Lead: UNESCO, UNITAR, WIPO, Relief (WFP?), IFAD UNICRI Lead: UNIDO, ITU, Lead: UNICEF OHCHR, Amnesty ▪ Kyle ▪ Cynthia Breazeal, MIT Media international Nel, Executive ▪ Robin Murphy, Lab. Director, Lowe's Roboticists ▪ Virginia Dignum, ▪ Sylvie Forbin, Deputy Director Innovation Labs Without Borders Associate Professor, General, Copyright & Creative TU Delft [proposed] ▪ Rob Opp, Industries Sector, WIPO ▪ Pablo Director of [proposed] ▪ Carsten Fink, Chief Rodriguez, CEO, Innovation and Economist, WIPO Telefonica Alpha ▪ (Expert proposed by UNESCO) Change [proposed] Management, WFP ▪ Katherine Discussion: ▪ Peggy Hicks, Director Maher, Executive ▪ UNICEF Kenya Mark R. Nelson, Executive of Thematic Director, Rep Director, (CSTA) Engagement, Special Wikimedia Procedures and Right Foundation Dave Reed, CSTA to Development, ▪ Adam Klaptocz, OHCHR Co-founder and CTO, WeRobotics ▪ (Expert proposed by [proposed] UNIDO) ▪ (OneConcern co- founder? [possible sponsorship] 12.00- Lunch break 13.30 13.30- [PLENARY 9] ‘Breakthrough’ proposals on poverty reduction and capacity building 14.00 Moderator: 14.00- [PLENARY 10] Investment, Economic Aspects and Designing the Future 15.00 Ian Goodfellow, Research Scientist, Google Brain (remote) Moderator: Andy Chen, Board Chair, IEEE Computer Society 15.00- Coffee break 15.30 15.30- Breakthrough Groups on investment Breakthrough Groups on Designing the Future 17.00 and Economic Aspects Impact Investment KPI for Success Approaches by governments, Roadmap for AI Industries, and other Lead: Ash Fontana, Lead: XPRIZE Lead: XPRIZE stakeholders Managing Director, Zetta Ventures Lead: Lynne Parker, Professor, University of Tennessee- Knoxville, Co-lead of task force task force that created the U.S. National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan. 17.00- [PLENARY 11] ‘Breakthrough’ proposals on investments, economic aspects and designing the future 17.30 Moderator: 17:30- [PLENARY 12] Closing Session 18:00 Peter Norvig, Director of Research, Google (remote) XPRIZE ITU Secretary-General .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wise Leadership & AI 3
    Wise Leadership and AI Leadership Chapter 3 | Behind the Scenes of the Machines What’s Ahead For Artificial General Intelligence? By Dr. Peter VERHEZEN With the AMROP EDITORIAL BOARD Putting the G in AI | 8 points True, generalized intelligence will be achieved when computers can do or learn anything that a human can. At the highest level, this will mean that computers aren’t just able to process the ‘what,’ but understand the ‘why’ behind data — context, and cause and effect relationships. Even someday chieving consciousness. All of this will demand ethical and emotional intelligence. 1 We underestimate ourselves The human brain is amazingly general compared to any digital device yet developed. It processes bottom-up and top-down information, whereas AI (still) only works bottom-up, based on what it ‘sees’, working on specific, narrowly defined tasks. So, unlike humans, AI is not yet situationally aware, nuanced, or multi-dimensional. 2 When can we expect AGI? Great minds do not think alike Some eminent thinkers (and tech entrepreneurs) see true AGI as only a decade or two away. Others see it as science fiction — AI will more likely serve to amplify human intelligence, just as mechanical machines have amplified physical strength. 3 AGI means moving from homo sapiens to homo deus Reaching AGI has been described by the futurist Ray Kurzweil as ‘singularity’. At this point, humans should progress to the ‘trans-human’ stage: cyber-humans (electronically enhanced) or neuro-augmented (bio-genetically enhanced). 4 The real risk with AGI is not malice, but unguided brilliance A super-intelligent machine will be fantastically good at meeting its goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters to the Editor
    Articles Letters to the Editor Research Priorities for is a product of human intelligence; we puter scientists, innovators, entrepre - cannot predict what we might achieve neurs, statisti cians, journalists, engi - Robust and Beneficial when this intelligence is magnified by neers, authors, professors, teachers, stu - Artificial Intelligence: the tools AI may provide, but the eradi - dents, CEOs, economists, developers, An Open Letter cation of disease and poverty are not philosophers, artists, futurists, physi - unfathomable. Because of the great cists, filmmakers, health-care profes - rtificial intelligence (AI) research potential of AI, it is important to sionals, research analysts, and members Ahas explored a variety of problems research how to reap its benefits while of many other fields. The earliest signa - and approaches since its inception, but avoiding potential pitfalls. tories follow, reproduced in order and as for the last 20 years or so has been The progress in AI research makes it they signed. For the complete list, see focused on the problems surrounding timely to focus research not only on tinyurl.com/ailetter. - ed. the construction of intelligent agents making AI more capable, but also on Stuart Russell, Berkeley, Professor of Com - — systems that perceive and act in maximizing the societal benefit of AI. puter Science, director of the Center for some environment. In this context, Such considerations motivated the “intelligence” is related to statistical Intelligent Systems, and coauthor of the AAAI 2008–09 Presidential Panel on standard textbook Artificial Intelligence: a and economic notions of rationality — Long-Term AI Futures and other proj - Modern Approach colloquially, the ability to make good ects on AI impacts, and constitute a sig - Tom Dietterich, Oregon State, President of decisions, plans, or inferences.
    [Show full text]
  • AIDA Hearing on AI and Competitiveness of 23 March 2021
    SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN A DIGITAL AGE (AIDA) HEARING ON AI AND COMPETITIVENESS Panel I: AI Governance Kristi Talving, Deputy Secretary General for Business Environment, Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications, Estonia Khalil Rouhana, Deputy Director General DG-CONNECT (CNECT), European Commission Kay Firth-Butterfield, Head of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learnings; Member of the Executive Committee, World Economic Forum Dr. Sebastian Wieczorek, Vice President – Artificial Intelligence Technology, SAP SE, external expert (until October 2020) in the study commission on AI in the Bundestag * * * Panel II: the perspective of Business and the Industry Prof. Volker Markl, Chair of Research Group at TU Berlin, Database Systems and Information Management, Director of the Intelligent Analytics for Massive Data Research Group at DFKI and Director of the Berlin Big Data Center and Secretary of the VLDB Endowment Moojan Asghari, Cofounder/Initiator of Women in AI, Founder/CEO of Thousand Eyes On Me Marina Geymonat, Expert for AI strategy @ Ministry for Economic Development, Italy. Head, Artificial intelligence Platform @TIM, Telecom Italia Group Jaan Tallinn, founding engineer of Skype and Kazaa as well as a cofounder of the Cambridge Centre for the Study of Existential Risk and Future of Life Institute 2 23-03-2021 BRUSSELS TUESDAY 23 MARCH 2021 1-002-0000 IN THE CHAIR: DRAGOŞ TUDORACHE Chair of the Special Committee on Artificial Intelligence in a Digital Age (The meeting opened at 9.06) Opening remarks 1-003-0000 Chair. – Good morning dear colleagues. I hope you are all connected and you can hear and see us in the room. Welcome to this new hearing of our committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Ssoar-2020-Selle-Der Effektive Altruismus Als Neue.Pdf
    www.ssoar.info Der effektive Altruismus als neue Größe auf dem deutschen Spendenmarkt: Analyse von Spendermotivation und Leistungsmerkmalen von Nichtregierungsorganisationen (NRO) auf das Spenderverhalten; eine Handlungsempfehlung für klassische NRO Selle, Julia Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Arbeitspapier / working paper Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Selle, J. (2020). Der effektive Altruismus als neue Größe auf dem deutschen Spendenmarkt: Analyse von Spendermotivation und Leistungsmerkmalen von Nichtregierungsorganisationen (NRO) auf das Spenderverhalten; eine Handlungsempfehlung für klassische NRO. (Opuscula, 137). Berlin: Maecenata Institut für Philanthropie und Zivilgesellschaft. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-67950-4 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de MAECENATA Julia Selle Der effektive Altruismus als neue Größe auf dem deutschen Spendenmarkt Analyse von Spendermotivation und Leistungsmerkmalen von Nichtregierungsorganisationen (NRO) auf das Spenderverhalten. Eine Handlungsempfehlung für klassische NRO. Opusculum Nr.137 Juni 2020 Die Autorin Julia Selle studierte an den Universität
    [Show full text]
  • Comments to Michael Jackson's Keynote on Determining Energy
    Comments to Michael Jackson’s Keynote on Determining Energy Futures using Artificial Intelligence Prof Sirkka Heinonen Finland Futures Research Centre (FFRC) University of Turku ENERGIZING FUTURES 13–14 June 2018 Tampere, Finland AI and Energy • Concrete tools: How Shaping Tomorrow answers the question How can AI help? • Goal of foresight crystal clear: Making better decisions today Huge Challenge – The Challenge The world will need to cut energy-related carbon dioxide emissions by 60 percent by 2050 -even as the population grows by more than two billion people Bold Solution on the Horizon The Renewable Energy Transition Companies as pioneers on energy themes, demand, supply, consumption • Google will reach 100% RE for its global operations this year • GE using AI to boost different forms of energy production and use tech-driven data reports to anticipate performance and maintenance needs around the world BUT …also the role of governments, cities and citizens …NGOs, media… new actors should be emphasised AI + Energy + Peer-to-Peer Society • The transformation of the energy system aligns with the principles of a Peer-to-Peer Society. • Peer-to-peer practices are based on the active participation and self-organisation of citizens. Citizens share knowledge, skills, co-create, and form new peer groups. • Citizens will use their capabilities also to develop energy-related products and services Rethinking Concepts Buildings as Power stations – global (economic) opportunity to construct buildings that generate, store and release solar energy
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report
    Technology is giving life ...or to self-destruct. the potential to flourish Let’s make a difference! like never before... Annual Report Making a Difference 2016 1 2016 By the Numbers Nuclear Participants Conference 200 We launched our nuclear divestment campaign at Speakers MIT’S Nuclear Conference. 18 and panelists Billion dollars committed $1 to nuclear divestment Conferences attended AI Safety 17 by FLI members Events This is an increase of 36 AI safety events from the Invitations to speak at events previous year. 15 Events co-organized to 4 highlight AI safety ubshe, eerreee ers Grant Recipients 43 ur rnt reents re rey hr t or to ee Worshos rntees orne 87 nor rtte n bene. rtes rtten by or bout rntee reserh 16 or mor ubtons 2 2016 By the Numbers, Cont. on eoe the 1 rete eos Website We rehe oer mon on sts eoe onne bout .5 to s estent rs n hoe. on sts to .5 rtes n ebes rtes220 ubshe ntony tht reerene Months of News s mentone n mor nes outets eery month o the yer. nternton100 rtes tht reerene rtes11 rtten or the ste Tot1 number o ontons Donors Wee hee so muh thns to the enerosty o our onors. on$3.3 onte to roets n onors ho e t est8 , 3 Message from the President It’s been a great honor for me to get to work with such a talented and idealistic team at our institute to ensure that tomorrow’s most powerful technologies have a positive impact on humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of AI: Opportunities and Challenges
    The Future of AI: Opportunities and Challenges Puerto Rico, January 2-5, 2015 ! Ajay Agrawal is the Peter Munk Professor of Entrepreneurship at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management, Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge, MA, Founder of the Creative Destruction Lab, and Co-founder of The Next 36. His research is focused on the economics of science and innovation. He serves on the editorial boards of Management Science, the Journal of Urban Economics, and The Strategic Management Journal. & Anthony Aguirre has worked on a wide variety of topics in theoretical cosmology, ranging from intergalactic dust to galaxy formation to gravity physics to the large-scale structure of inflationary universes and the arrow of time. He also has strong interest in science outreach, and has appeared in numerous science documentaries. He is a co-founder of the Foundational Questions Institute and the Future of Life Institute. & Geoff Anders is the founder of Leverage Research, a research institute that studies psychology, cognitive enhancement, scientific methodology, and the impact of technology on society. He is also a member of the Effective Altruism movement, a movement dedicated to improving the world in the most effective ways. Like many of the members of the Effective Altruism movement, Geoff is deeply interested in the potential impact of new technologies, especially artificial intelligence. & Blaise Agüera y Arcas works on machine learning at Google. Previously a Distinguished Engineer at Microsoft, he has worked on augmented reality, mapping, wearable computing and natural user interfaces. He was the co-creator of Photosynth, software that assembles photos into 3D environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Beneficial AI 2017
    Beneficial AI 2017 Participants & Attendees 1 Anthony Aguirre is a Professor of Physics at the University of California, Santa Cruz. He has worked on a wide variety of topics in theoretical cosmology and fundamental physics, including inflation, black holes, quantum theory, and information theory. He also has strong interest in science outreach, and has appeared in numerous science documentaries. He is a co-founder of the Future of Life Institute, the Foundational Questions Institute, and Metaculus (http://www.metaculus.com/). Sam Altman is president of Y Combinator and was the cofounder of Loopt, a location-based social networking app. He also co-founded OpenAI with Elon Musk. Sam has invested in over 1,000 companies. Dario Amodei is the co-author of the recent paper Concrete Problems in AI Safety, which outlines a pragmatic and empirical approach to making AI systems safe. Dario is currently a research scientist at OpenAI, and prior to that worked at Google and Baidu. Dario also helped to lead the project that developed Deep Speech 2, which was named one of 10 “Breakthrough Technologies of 2016” by MIT Technology Review. Dario holds a PhD in physics from Princeton University, where he was awarded the Hertz Foundation doctoral thesis prize. Amara Angelica is Research Director for Ray Kurzweil, responsible for books, charts, and special projects. Amara’s background is in aerospace engineering, in electronic warfare, electronic intelligence, human factors, and computer systems analysis areas. A co-founder and initial Academic Model/Curriculum Lead for Singularity University, she was formerly on the board of directors of the National Space Society, is a member of the Space Development Steering Committee, and is a professional member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Activities on Artificial Intelligence (AI) 2018
    United Nations Activities on Artifi cial Intelligence (AI) United Nations Activities on Artificial Intelligence (AI) 2018 Table of Contents Foreword v Introduction vii Annex: Activities on Artificial Intelligence vii Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization 8 International Civil Aviation Organization 11 International Labour Organisation 13 International Telecommunication Union 15 United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS 18 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 19 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs 21 United Nations Development Programme 22 United Nations Economic Commission for Europe 24 United Nations Environment Programme 26 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 28 United Nations Population Fund 30 United Nations Global Pulse 32 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 34 United Nations Children’s Fund 35 United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute 38 United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research 40 United Nations Industrial Development Organization 42 United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction 44 United Nations Institute for Training and Research 46 United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs 48 United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs 50 United Nations University 52 World Food Programme 54 World Health Organization 56 World Intellectual Property Organization 58 World Bank Group 59 iii Foreword Recent progress in Artificial Intelligence has been im- mense and exponential. The technology is making its way out of research labs and into our everyday lives, prom- ising to help us tackle humanity’s greatest challenges. As the UN specialized agency for information and com- munication technologies, ITU believes in the power of AI for good, and organizes the “AI for Good” series since 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • AI Research Considerations for Human Existential Safety (ARCHES)
    AI Research Considerations for Human Existential Safety (ARCHES) Andrew Critch Center for Human-Compatible AI UC Berkeley David Krueger MILA Université de Montréal June 11, 2020 Abstract Framed in positive terms, this report examines how technical AI research might be steered in a manner that is more attentive to hu- manity’s long-term prospects for survival as a species. In negative terms, we ask what existential risks humanity might face from AI development in the next century, and by what principles contempo- rary technical research might be directed to address those risks. A key property of hypothetical AI technologies is introduced, called prepotence, which is useful for delineating a variety of poten- tial existential risks from artificial intelligence, even as AI paradigms might shift. A set of twenty-nine contemporary research directions are then examined for their potential benefit to existential safety. Each research direction is explained with a scenario-driven motiva- tion, and examples of existing work from which to build. The research directions present their own risks and benefits to society that could occur at various scales of impact, and in particular are not guaran- teed to benefit existential safety if major developments in them are deployed without adequate forethought and oversight. As such, each direction is accompanied by a consideration of potentially negative arXiv:2006.04948v1 [cs.CY] 30 May 2020 side effects. Taken more broadly, the twenty-nine explanations of the research directions also illustrate a highly rudimentary methodology for dis- cussing and assessing potential risks and benefits of research direc- tions, in terms of their impact on global catastrophic risks.
    [Show full text]
  • F.3. the NEW POLITICS of ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [Preliminary Notes]
    F.3. THE NEW POLITICS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [preliminary notes] MAIN MEMO pp 3-14 I. Introduction II. The Infrastructure: 13 key AI organizations III. Timeline: 2005-present IV. Key Leadership V. Open Letters VI. Media Coverage VII. Interests and Strategies VIII. Books and Other Media IX. Public Opinion X. Funders and Funding of AI Advocacy XI. The AI Advocacy Movement and the Techno-Eugenics Movement XII. The Socio-Cultural-Psychological Dimension XIII. Push-Back on the Feasibility of AI+ Superintelligence XIV. Provisional Concluding Comments ATTACHMENTS pp 15-78 ADDENDA pp 79-85 APPENDICES [not included in this pdf] ENDNOTES pp 86-88 REFERENCES pp 89-92 Richard Hayes July 2018 DRAFT: NOT FOR CIRCULATION OR CITATION F.3-1 ATTACHMENTS A. Definitions, usage, brief history and comments. B. Capsule information on the 13 key AI organizations. C. Concerns raised by key sets of the 13 AI organizations. D. Current development of AI by the mainstream tech industry E. Op-Ed: Transcending Complacency on Superintelligent Machines - 19 Apr 2014. F. Agenda for the invitational “Beneficial AI” conference - San Juan, Puerto Rico, Jan 2-5, 2015. G. An Open Letter on Maximizing the Societal Benefits of AI – 11 Jan 2015. H. Partnership on Artificial Intelligence to Benefit People and Society (PAI) – roster of partners. I. Influential mainstream policy-oriented initiatives on AI: Stanford (2016); White House (2016); AI NOW (2017). J. Agenda for the “Beneficial AI 2017” conference, Asilomar, CA, Jan 2-8, 2017. K. Participants at the 2015 and 2017 AI strategy conferences in Puerto Rico and Asilomar. L. Notes on participants at the Asilomar “Beneficial AI 2017” meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • The AIGO: a Framework for Planning, Developing, and Deploying Artificial Intelligence in Intergovernmental Organizations
    The AIGO: A Framework for Planning, Developing, and Deploying Artificial Intelligence in Intergovernmental Organizations Jannik Seger Nicolas Miailhe Simon Mueller JANUARY 2019 The AIGO: A Framework for Planning, Developing, and Deploying Artificial Intelligence in Intergovernmental Organizations JANUARY 2019 Jannik Seger | Nicolas Miailhe | Simon Mueller Artificial Intelligence (AI) has created significant value in prediction technology and illustrates the evolution from crucial areas such as healthcare, finance, energy, retrospective to AI-based, forward looking data analytics transportation, and environmental protection. The • Section IV details the value-creation potential of AI that productivity gains caused by AI hold the potential to bolster IGOs may realize by firmly integrating AI into their core growth and development over the next decades by making processes: improved insight generation, faster and decision-making processes and resource management of larger-scale evidence-based decision making, and complex systems more efficient. optimization of output delivery processes Similar to the steam engine or electricity, AI is a versatile • Section V provides a detailed, multi-step roadmap for an enabling technology with a diverse range of applications. effective implementation of AI in IGOs. It shows how to While the previous two paved the way for the creation of develop a strategic intent for AI, ensure senior specialized machines that could replace human physical executives’ support, lay the organizational foundations, labor for defined tasks, AI will eventually allow for the and ensure adequate data quality. IGO executives find development of self-optimizing information systems capable practical advice on how to prepare the cultural transition, of replacing human cognitive labor in specific settings and identify and prioritize use cases, and ensure a successful applications.
    [Show full text]