DOCSLIB.ORG

North Slope Unit Land Working Interest Ownership

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Slope Unit Land Working Interest Ownership North Slope Borough Oil and Gas Technical Report: Planning for Oil & Gas Activities in the National Petroleum Reserve – Alaska Appendix F: Map of Units with Ownership Interests Oil and Gas Technical Report: Planning for Oil and Gas Activities in the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska | F-1 State of Alaska North Slope Unit Land Department of Natural Resources Division of Oil & Gas Working Interest Ownership Nikaitchuq Unit Point Thomson Unit ENI Petroleum 100% Exxon Mobil Corp. 46.13% BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 27.06% Oooguruk Unit Chevron USA Inc. 11.72% Pioneer Natural Resource Alaska Inc. 71.30% ExxonMobil Oil Corp. 10.63% Eni Petroleum US LLC 27.35% ConocoPhilips Alaska, Inc. 3.21% XH, LLC 0.57% Milne Point Unit Devon Energy Corp. 0.55% George Alan Joyce, Jr 0.40% BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 97.03% B E A U F O R T S E A Cook Inlet Energy, LLC 0.29% Anadarko Petroleum Corp. 0.38% Eni Petroleum US LLC 1.09% Aubris Resources, LP 0.07% Prudhoe Bay Unit Herbaly Exploration LLC 1.02% Edward H.Leede 0.07% ExxonMobil Alaska Production Inc. 36.40% Placer Unit Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. 0.75% Trans World Oil & Gas Ltd. 0.07% ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. 36.08% ASRC Exploration, LLC 100% George Alan Joyce, Jr. 0.11% Pacic Lighting Gas Development Co. 0.03% BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 26.36% Samson Oshore, LLC 0.03% Harrison Bay Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 1.16% Qugruk Unit Sunlite International Inc. 0.03% Repsol E&P USA Inc. 70.00% Dewline Unit Kingdon R.Huges Family Partnership 0.02% 70 & 148, LLC 22.50% UltraStar Exploration LLC 100% Chap-KDL, Ltd. 0.02% GMT Exploration Co., LLC 7.50% Estate of John W.Perry (Susan Jean Searls Collier, Linda Lou Searls Neidert, Colville River Unit Jean Alice Searls and John Peery Searls 0.01% ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. 76.64% Leed & Pine, a Partnership 0.01% Anadarko Petroleum Corp. 22.42% Northstar Unit Mary Lou Holbrook (The Eastland Oil Co.) 0.01% Petro-Hunt, LLC 0.40% BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 99.84% Peggy D.McConnell XH, LLC 0.31% Murphy Exploration (Alaska), Inc. 0.16% (Eastland Property & Minerals) 0.01% Rosewood Resources Inc. 0.24% Richard Donnelly 0.01% Robert Searls, Jr. Testamentary Trust (Collier/Searls) 0.01% The George A. Donnelly III 1991 Liberty Unit Irrevocable Trust 0.00% BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 100% The Robert R. Donnelly III 1991 Irrevocable Trust 0.00% Jan Donnelly O’Neill, Irrevocable 0.00% Woodbine Petroleum Inc. 0.00% Dalton Hwy. Duck Island Unit BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 52.68% ExxonMobil Corp. 24.76% Arctic Bear Tooth Unit Chevron USA Inc. 19.17% ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. 75.38% Kuparuk River Unit Phillips Alaska, Inc. 3.05% National Anadarko Petroleum Corp. 24.62% ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. 54.02% Doyon, Limited 0.26% Badami Unit Wildlife BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 38.30% NANA Regional Corp., Inc. 0.09% Savant Alaska, LLC 67.50% Chevron USA Inc. 4.95% ASRC Exploration LLC 32.50% Refuge Greater Moose’s Tooth Unit ExxonMobil Alaska Production Inc. 2.74% ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. 100% TTRANS-ALASKA PIPELINE State Unit Pipeline Tofkat Unit Southern Miluveach Unit Alaska Seaward Boundary Ramshorn Investments, Inc. 61.40% Federal / State Unit Ramshorn Investments, Inc. 50% Arctic Fortitude Unit AVCG, LLC 29.78% (Outer Continental Shelf Boundary) AVCG, LLC 30% Alaska Crude Corp. 79.88% Federal Unit Brooks Range Development Corp. 8.81% Brooks Range Development Corp. 20% James W. White 20.12% Note: Unit boundaries, acreages and land working interest ownership (WIO) percent are subject to Non-Producing Unit change due to formation of new units, contractions, National and expansions of unit acreages, termination of unit Kachemach Unit Terminated, in litigation agreements, and changes in WIO. For Petroleum Ramshorn Investments, Inc. 50% simplification, WIO percentages are based on total Beechey Point Unit land ownership in unit or lease and were rounded AVCG, LLC 30% Reserve Ramshorn Investments Inc. 41.33% to two decimal points. Unit and lease ownership Brooks Range Development Corp. 20% may be different than ownership of production. Alaska AVCG, LLC 27.37% Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 11.33% Map Published December 2013 ExxonMobil Oil Corp. 11.33% $ Brooks Range Development Corp. 8.65% 0 5 10 20 Miles Map Location This map contains data from various sources and DNR holds no responsibility to the accuracy of the data displayed on this map. Oil and Gas Technical Report: Planning for Oil and Gas Activities in the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska | F-1 State of Alaska North Slope Unit Land Department of Natural Resources Division of Oil & Gas Working Interest Ownership Nikaitchuq Unit Point Thomson Unit ENI Petroleum 100% Exxon Mobil Corp. 46.13% BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 27.06% Oooguruk Unit Chevron USA Inc. 11.72% Pioneer Natural Resource Alaska Inc. 71.30% ExxonMobil Oil Corp. 10.63% Eni Petroleum US LLC 27.35% ConocoPhilips Alaska, Inc. 3.21% XH, LLC 0.57% Milne Point Unit Devon Energy Corp. 0.55% George Alan Joyce, Jr 0.40% BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 97.03% B E A U F O R T S E A Cook Inlet Energy, LLC 0.29% Anadarko Petroleum Corp. 0.38% Eni Petroleum US LLC 1.09% Aubris Resources, LP 0.07% Prudhoe Bay Unit Herbaly Exploration LLC 1.02% Edward H.Leede 0.07% ExxonMobil Alaska Production Inc. 36.40% Placer Unit Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. 0.75% Trans World Oil & Gas Ltd. 0.07% ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. 36.08% ASRC Exploration, LLC 100% George Alan Joyce, Jr. 0.11% Pacic Lighting Gas Development Co. 0.03% BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 26.36% Samson Oshore, LLC 0.03% Harrison Bay Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 1.16% Qugruk Unit Sunlite International Inc. 0.03% Repsol E&P USA Inc. 70.00% Dewline Unit Kingdon R.Huges Family Partnership 0.02% 70 & 148, LLC 22.50% UltraStar Exploration LLC 100% Chap-KDL, Ltd. 0.02% GMT Exploration Co., LLC 7.50% Estate of John W.Perry (Susan Jean Searls Collier, Linda Lou Searls Neidert, Colville River Unit Jean Alice Searls and John Peery Searls 0.01% ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. 76.64% Leed & Pine, a Partnership 0.01% Anadarko Petroleum Corp. 22.42% Northstar Unit Mary Lou Holbrook (The Eastland Oil Co.) 0.01% Petro-Hunt, LLC 0.40% BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 99.84% Peggy D.McConnell XH, LLC 0.31% Murphy Exploration (Alaska), Inc. 0.16% (Eastland Property & Minerals) 0.01% Rosewood Resources Inc. 0.24% Richard Donnelly 0.01% Robert Searls, Jr. Testamentary Trust (Collier/Searls) 0.01% The George A. Donnelly III 1991 Liberty Unit Irrevocable Trust 0.00% BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 100% The Robert R. Donnelly III 1991 Irrevocable Trust 0.00% Jan Donnelly O’Neill, Irrevocable 0.00% Woodbine Petroleum Inc. 0.00% Dalton Hwy. Duck Island Unit BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 52.68% ExxonMobil Corp. 24.76% Arctic Bear Tooth Unit Chevron USA Inc. 19.17% ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. 75.38% Kuparuk River Unit Phillips Alaska, Inc. 3.05% National Anadarko Petroleum Corp. 24.62% ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. 54.02% Doyon, Limited 0.26% Badami Unit Wildlife BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 38.30% NANA Regional Corp., Inc. 0.09% Savant Alaska, LLC 67.50% Chevron USA Inc. 4.95% ASRC Exploration LLC 32.50% Refuge Greater Moose’s Tooth Unit ExxonMobil Alaska Production Inc. 2.74% ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. 100% TTRANS-ALASKA PIPELINE State Unit Pipeline Tofkat Unit Southern Miluveach Unit Alaska Seaward Boundary Ramshorn Investments, Inc. 61.40% Federal / State Unit Ramshorn Investments, Inc. 50% Arctic Fortitude Unit AVCG, LLC 29.78% (Outer Continental Shelf Boundary) AVCG, LLC 30% Alaska Crude Corp. 79.88% Federal Unit Brooks Range Development Corp. 8.81% Brooks Range Development Corp. 20% James W. White 20.12% Note: Unit boundaries, acreages and land working interest ownership (WIO) percent are subject to Non-Producing Unit change due to formation of new units, contractions, National and expansions of unit acreages, termination of unit Kachemach Unit Terminated, in litigation agreements, and changes in WIO. For Petroleum Ramshorn Investments, Inc. 50% simplification, WIO percentages are based on total Beechey Point Unit land ownership in unit or lease and were rounded AVCG, LLC 30% Reserve Ramshorn Investments Inc. 41.33% to two decimal points. Unit and lease ownership Brooks Range Development Corp. 20% may be different than ownership of production. Alaska AVCG, LLC 27.37% Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 11.33% Map Published December 2013 ExxonMobil Oil Corp. 11.33% $ Brooks Range Development Corp. 8.65% 0 5 10 20 Miles Map Location This map contains data from various sources and DNR holds no responsibility to the accuracy of the data displayed on this map. Oil and Gas Technical Report: Planning for Oil and Gas Activities in the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska | F-2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bakken Production Optimization Program Prospectus
    Bakken Production Optimization Program BAKKEN PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION PROGRAM 2.0 PROSPECTUS PROGRAM INTRODUCTION Led by the Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC), the highly successful Bakken Production Optimization Program (BPOP), funded by its members and the North Dakota Industrial Commission, is continuing for the time frame of 2017–2020. The goal of this research program, BPOP 2.0, is to improve Bakken system oil recovery and reduce its environmental footprint. The results of the 3-year program will increase well productivity and the economic output of North Dakota’s oil and gas resources, decrease environmental impacts of wellsite operations, and reduce demand for infrastructure construction and maintenance. BPOP 1.0 PARTNERS A premier partnership program was recently completed which has been cited as an exemplary model by others nationwide. It has demonstrated that state lawmakers, state regulators, and industry can work together for positive results for shareholders and taxpayers alike. Phase I partners focused research on industry-driven challenges and opportunities. Continental Resources, Inc. ® Marathon Oil Corporation America’s Oil Champion Whiting Petroleum Corporation North Dakota Oil and Gas Research Program ConocoPhillips Company Nuverra Environmental Solutions Hitachi Hess Corporation Oasis Petroleum, Inc. SM Energy XTO Energy, Inc. BPOP 1.0 ACHIEVEMENTS (2013–2016) Continental’s Hawkinson Project Water Use and Handling Forecast Aimed at significantly increasing total production and A summary of trends in the Bakken, an estimation of production rates from North Dakota oil wells where oil future demand/disposal needs, an overview of treatment reserves of the second and third benches of the Three technologies, recycling/reuse considerations, and a Forks Formation, located just below the Bakken oil summary of implications for BPOP partners were created.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Insights Report
    Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Insights Report Partners XxxxContents Introduction 3 Five key findings 5 Key finding 1: Staying within 1.5°C means companies must 6 keep oil and gas in the ground Key finding 2: Smoke and mirrors: companies are deflecting 8 attention from their inaction and ineffective climate strategies Key finding 3: Greatest contributors to climate change show 11 limited recognition of emissions responsibility through targets and planning Key finding 4: Empty promises: companies’ capital 12 expenditure in low-carbon technologies not nearly enough Key finding 5:National oil companies: big emissions, 16 little transparency, virtually no accountability Ranking 19 Module Summaries 25 Module 1: Targets 25 Module 2: Material Investment 28 Module 3: Intangible Investment 31 Module 4: Sold Products 32 Module 5: Management 34 Module 6: Supplier Engagement 37 Module 7: Client Engagement 39 Module 8: Policy Engagement 41 Module 9: Business Model 43 CLIMATE AND ENERGY BENCHMARK IN OIL AND GAS - INSIGHTS REPORT 2 Introduction Our world needs a major decarbonisation and energy transformation to WBA’s Climate and Energy Benchmark measures and ranks the world’s prevent the climate crisis we’re facing and meet the Paris Agreement goal 100 most influential oil and gas companies on their low-carbon transition. of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Without urgent climate action, we will The Oil and Gas Benchmark is the first comprehensive assessment experience more extreme weather events, rising sea levels and immense of companies in the oil and gas sector using the International Energy negative impacts on ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Conocophillips Alaska: Investing in Alaska in Changing Times
    ConocoPhillips Alaska: Investing in Alaska in Changing Times Jan. 13, 2017 Joe Marushack, President January 12, 2017 Cautionary Statement & Safe Harbor The following presentation includes forward‐looking statements. These statements relate to future events, such as anticipated revenues, earnings, business strategies, competitive position or other aspects of our operations, operating results or the industries or markets in which we operate or participate in general. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in such forward‐ looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may prove to be incorrect and are difficult to predict such as oil and gas prices; operational hazards and drilling risks; potential failure to achieve, and potential delays in achieving expected reserves or production levels from existing and future oil and gas development projects; unsuccessful exploratory activities; unexpected cost increases or technical difficulties in constructing, maintaining or modifying company facilities; international monetary conditions and exchange controls; potential liability for remedial actions under existing or future environmental regulations or from pending or future litigation; limited access to capital or significantly higher cost of capital related to illiquidity or uncertainty in the domestic or international financial markets; general domestic and international economic and political conditions, as well as changes in tax, environmental and other laws applicable to ConocoPhillips’ business and other economic, business, competitive and/or regulatory factors affecting ConocoPhillips’ business generally as set forth in ConocoPhillips’ filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We caution you not to place undue reliance on our forward‐looking statements, which are only as of the date of this presentation or as otherwise indicated, and we expressly disclaim any responsibility for updating such information.
    [Show full text]
  • World Oil Review 2018
    volume 1 World Oil Review 2018 World Oil Review 2018 Contents Introduction List of Countries VI Notes and Methods VIII Oil - Supply and Demand Oil - Production Quality Reserves 2 World 46 Areas and Aggregates 2 Crude Production by Quality 46 The World Top 10 Reserves Holders 3 Crude Production by Gravity 46 Countries 4 Crude Production by Sulphur Content 46 Cluster of Companies 6 Quality and Production Volume of Main Crudes 47 Crude Production by Quality - Charts 48 Production 7 Areas and Aggregates 7 Europe 49 The World Top 10 Producers 8 Crude Production by Quality 49 Countries 9 Quality and Production Volume of Main Crudes 49 Cluster of Companies 11 Crude Production by Quality - Charts 50 The World Top 10 Natural Gas Liquids Producers 12 Countries 51 Reserves/Production Ratio 13 Russia and Central Asia 52 Areas and Aggregates 13 Crude Production by Quality 52 The World Top 10 Producers Ranked by Quality and Production Volume of Main Crudes 52 Reserves/Production Ratio 14 Crude Production by Quality - Charts 53 Countries 15 Countries 54 Consumption 18 Middle East 55 Areas and Aggregates 18 Crude Production by Quality 55 The World Top 10 Consumers 19 Quality and Production Volume of Main Crudes 55 Countries 20 Crude Production by Quality - Charts 56 Countries 57 Per Capita Consumption 23 Areas and Aggregates 23 Africa 58 The World Top 10 Consumers Ranked by Crude Production by Quality 58 Per Capita Consumption Ratio 24 Quality and Production Volume of Main Crudes 58 Countries 25 Crude Production by Quality - Charts 59 Countries 60 Production/Consumption
    [Show full text]
  • Drilling the Monterey Shale
    A New California Oil Boom? Drilling the Monterey Shale By Robert Collier December 2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Part 1: Distracted by Fracking? 3 Part 2: The Most dangerous chemical you’ve never heard of 6 Part 3: The Climate conundrum 9 Part 4: Monterey Shale: Twice as polluting as Keystone XL? 13 Part 5: Is California really like North Dakota? 18 Part 6: Keeping the story straight: industry reports at odds on California oil 24 Notes 27 Page 2 | Drilling the Monterey Shale Part 1: Distracted by Fracking? Over the past few years, the United States has found the more likely candidate for tapping the Monterey itself in the midst of a major boom in oil and gas Shale: A technique, already widely in use in the oil production. Rapid expansion in the use of a drilling industry, known as “acidizing.” technique called hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” has opened up previously unreachable pockets of oil It’s not widely discussed in publicly, but for some and gas, and returned the U.S. to its historic position time oil companies have found acidizing more as a major global producer of these fossil fuels. effective in the Monterey Shale than fracking. And it seems the boom may be coming to Acidizing typically involves the injection of high California. Once a leading producer of oil in the U.S., volumes of hydrofluoric acid, a powerful solvent, California’s production has fallen off dramatically (abbreviated as “HF”) into the oil well to dissolve over the years as oil fields age and are depleted.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SNAM SHAREHOLDER the GUIDE to GETTING INVOLVED in YOUR INVESTMENT 2 Snam | L'azionista Di Snam | Testatina
    Snam | L'azionista di Snam | Testatina 1 April 2018 THE SNAM SHAREHOLDER THE GUIDE TO GETTING INVOLVED IN YOUR INVESTMENT 2 Snam | L'azionista di Snam | Testatina Dear shareholders, the purpose of this Guide is to provide annually both current and potential owners of Snam shares with a summary of relevant information. Starting from 2010, it is part of a series of tools to enhance our communication with retail investors. We believe that the trust you have showed us Snam must be cultivated through an increasingly Company profile 3 effective dialogue. The first part Snam overview 4 of the Guide outlines the Group’s Snam: an integrated player in the gas system 5 structure, its business and strategic Management team 6 guidelines. The Guide also presents Governance in action 7 some key features about Snam Regulation in Italy 8 shares and practical information Regulation in Europe 9 so that you can really get involved Inclusion in SRI indices 10 in your role as a shareholder. Snam strategy 11 We hope that these pages will be Snam in Europe 13 easy and interesting to read, Corporate structure 14 as well as helpful. By nature, this Guide is not an exhaustive Snam on the Stock Exchange Remuneration through dividends 16 product. In order to obtain Stock Market performance 17 more complete information Shareholders 19 we invite you to visit our corporate The bond market 20 website at www.snam.it or, Income Statement figures 21 for specific requests, to contact Balance Sheet figures 22 the Investor Relations department. Cash flow 23 Get involved in your Snam investment The steps to investing 25 Attend the Shareholders’ Meeting 26 Keep yourself informed and participate in corporate events 27 Snam | The Snam Shareholder | Company profile 3 Company profile Snam is Europe’s leading gas utility.
    [Show full text]
  • EXXONMOBIL DEVELOPMENT § COMPANY; and EXXONMOBIL § OIL CORPORATION, § § Plaintiffs, § § V
    Case 3:17-cv-01930-B Document 110 Filed 12/31/19 Page 1 of 35 PageID <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION; § EXXONMOBIL DEVELOPMENT § COMPANY; and EXXONMOBIL § OIL CORPORATION, § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-1930-B § STEVEN MNUCHIN, in his official § capacity as Secretary of the U.S. § Department of the Treasury; § ANDREA M. GACKI, in her official § capacity as the Director of the U.S. § Department of the Treasury’s Office § of Foreign Assets Control; and the U.S. § DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY’S § OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS § CONTROL, § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiffs Exxon Mobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Development Company, and ExxonMobil Oil Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 92), as well as Defendants Steven Mnuchin, Andrea Gacki, and the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 95). The parties dispute whether the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s imposition of a two-million-dollar fine upon Plaintiffs for alleged violations of Ukraine-related sanctions regulations was lawful. Because the Court concludes that Plaintiffs lacked fair notice that their conduct was prohibited, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion (Doc. 92) and DENIES Defendants’ cross-motion (Doc. 95). Further, the Court VACATES the Office of Foreign Asset - 1 - Case 3:17-cv-01930-B Document 110 Filed 12/31/19 Page 2 of 35 PageID <pageID> Control’s Penalty Notice. I. BACKGROUND1 This is an administrative case prompting the Court to determine which party receives the benefit of having its cake and eating it, too—the regulating agency that failed to clarify, or the regulated party that failed to ask.
    [Show full text]
  • Exxonmobil Indonesia at a Glance Country Fact Sheet
    ExxonMobil Indonesia at a glance Country fact sheet KEY FACTS 1898 Standard Oil Company of New York (Socony) opens a marketing office in Java. 1968 Mobil Oil Indonesia Inc. (MOI) is formed and becomes one of the first contractors to be involved in the country’s newly established “Production Sharing Contract (PSC)” approach for B block in North Aceh. MOI is later renamed ExxonMobil Oil Indonesia (EMOI) in 2000. 2001 A discovery of over 450 million barrels of oil at Banyu Urip oil field, East Java. 2005 ExxonMobil Cepu Limited (EMCL) assigned as operator for the Cepu block under PSC. 2006 Banyu Urip Plan of Development (POD) approved by the government of Indonesia. 2009 Cepu block commenced commercial production through Early Production Facility (EPF). 2011 EMCL awards five major Banyu Urip project Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) contracts to five Indonesian-led consortiums. 2015 In October, ExxonMobil assigned its interest in the North Sumatra Block Offshore (NSO) and B Block PSC to Pertamina. The start-up of Banyu Urip’s onshore Central Processiong Facility (CPF) commenced in December. 2016 POD production of 165,000 barrels of oil per day is achieved at Banyu Urip field. NOW Approximately 570 employees at ExxonMobil Indonesia. Nearly 90 percent are Indonesians, many of whom are senior managers and engineers. Increasing energy supply for Indonesia. The FSO vessel, Gagak Rimang, connected to the mooring tower. UPSTREAM Cepu block East Natuna block • The Cepu Block PSC was signed on 17 September 2005 • Located in the South China Sea. covering the Cepu Contract Area in Central and East Java.
    [Show full text]
  • California Resources Corporation (The “Company”) Believes Will Or May Occur in the Future Are Forward-Looking Statements
    FINANCIAL AND OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS Dollar and share amounts in millions, except per-share amounts as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 2014 2013 Financial Highlights Revenues $ 2,403 $ 4,173 $ 4,284 Income / (Loss) Before Income Taxes $ (5,476 ) $ (2,421 ) $ 1,447 Net Income / (Loss) $ (3,554 ) $ (1,434 ) $ 869 Adjusted Net Income / (Loss) (a) $ (311) $ 650 $ 869 EPS – Basic and Diluted (b) $ (9.27 ) $ (3.75 ) $ 2.24 Adjusted EPS – Basic and Diluted (b) $ (0.81) $ 1.67 $ 2.24 Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities $ 403 $ 2,371 $ 2,476 Capital Investments $ (401 ) $ (2,089 ) $ (1,669 ) Proceeds from Debt, Net $ 379 $ 6,360 — Cash Dividends to Occidental — $ (6,000 ) — Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities $ 352 $ (45) $ (763) Total Assets $ 7,053 $ 12,429 $ 14,297 Long-Term Debt – Principal Amount $ 6,043 $ 6,360 — Deferred Gain and Issuance Costs, Net $ 491 $ (68 ) — Equity / Net Investment $ (916) $ 2,611 $ 9,989 Weighted Average Shares Outstanding 383.2 381.9 — Year-End Shares 388.2 385.6 — Operational Highlights 2015 2014 2013 Production: Crude Oil (MBbl/d) 104 99 90 NGLs (MBbl/d) 18 19 20 Natural Gas (MMcf/d) 229 246 260 Total (MBoe/d) 160 159 154 Average Realized Prices: Crude with hedge ($/Bbl) $ 49.19 $ 92.30 $ 104.16 Crude without hedge ($/Bbl) $ 47.15 $ 92.30 $ 104.16 NGLs ($/Bbl) $ 19.62 $ 47.84 $ 50.43 Natural Gas with hedge ($/Mcf) $ 2.66 $ 4.39 $ 3.73 Reserves: Crude Oil (MMBbl) 466 551 532 NGLs (MMBbl) 59 85 71 Natural Gas (Bcf) 715 790 844 Total (MBoe/d) 644 768 744 Acreage (in thousands): Net Developed 736 716 701 Net Undeveloped 1,653 1,691 1,604 Total 2,389 2,407 2,305 Closing Share Price $ 2.33 $ 5.51 (a) For discussion of, or reconciliation to the most closely-related GAAP measure, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results,” in our Form 10-K.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction to Start by Year's End Conocophillips Strikes $9.7B Deal
    Leading Utica Producer Gulfport in Restructuring Talks with Lenders.............................2 Tuesday, October 20, 2020 - Vol. 11, No. 13 PERMIAN BASIN ConocoPhillips Strikes $9.7B Deal to Buy Concho, Create Permian Behemoth ConocoPhillips on Monday announced it is taking over Concho Resources Inc. for $9.7 billion in stock, forming a giant in the Permian Basin that would rival the output of the biggest players in the nation’s most produc- tive oilfield. Concho, a Permian pure-play, is the fifth-largest producer by volume in the massive field. The combina- tion marks the largest Lower 48 industry acquisition an- nounced since the pandemic arrived in the United States in March. The deal would elevate ConocoPhillips into a small pool of dominant players in the Permian, joining Trade Date: Oct 19; Flow Date(s): Oct 20 …cont' pg. 2 leaders such as Occidental Petroleum Corp. and Basin/Region Range Avg Chg Vol Deals Gulf Coast Barnett 2.130-2.300 2.260 0.175 198 38 BAKKEN SHALE Eagle Ford 2.650-2.850 2.685 0.270 348 57 Haynesville - E. TX 2.150-2.370 2.280 0.205 1,807 290 North Dakota Sees Oil, Natural Gas Haynesville - N. LA 2.300-2.360 2.315 0.255 162 36 Permian1 -0.750-2.100 -0.245 0.050 668 144 Production Climb in August Tuscaloosa Marine Shale 2.300-2.360 2.340 0.200 424 68 North Dakota oil and natural gas production shot up Midcontinent Arkoma - Woodford 2.100-2.280 2.200 0.160 188 32 in August along with gas capture volumes, but the produc- Cana - Woodford 2.400-2.550 2.470 0.445 64 13 tion surge is expected to fall back and continue declining Fayetteville 2.290-2.300 2.295 0.245 126 30 Granite Wash* 2.010-2.360 2.295 0.235 857 162 by the end of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Qtr17 Spirit-Magazine.Pdf
    CONOCOPHILLIPS Third Quarter 2017 Providing energy for the world while staying committed to our values. ConocoPhillips is proud to be an industry leader in fi nding and producing the oil and gas the world needs. At the foundation of our work is the commitment we have to our SPIRIT Values—Safety, People, Integrity, Responsibility, Innovation and Teamwork. To learn more, visit www.conocophillips.com © ConocoPhillips Company. 2017. All rights reserved. SHARING INSIGHTS From the desk of Ryan Lance Chairman & CEO AS THE HOUSTON AREA RECOVERS from the devastating aftermath of Hurricane Harvey, I continue to be impressed by the incredible compassion and resilience of our ConocoPhillips workforce. We are forging ahead on many fronts, including the completion of this special issue of spirit Magazine featuring the annual SPIRIT of Performance Awards. One of the most important responsibilities of my job is meeting with ConocoPhillips employees and listening to their ideas and concerns. During the past quarter, I visited China, Malaysia and Indonesia and saw the amazing work our people are doing on projects such as additional development phases at the Peng Lai field in Bohai Bay; production rampup and an active exploration program in Malaysia; and an initiative to sell more gas in Indonesia. During a visit to Alaska, I heard excitement around our Willow discovery in the National Petroleum Reserve and the active upcoming winter drilling campaign. In July, the company’s board of directors joined me on a visit to our Bakken operations in North Dakota, where the team patiently answered all our questions and showed why ConocoPhillips is recognized as an operator of choice in that important region.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    Registered Head Office, Piazzale Enrico Mattei, 1 00144 Roma Tel. +39 06598.21 www.eni.com Rome February 19, 2021 Eni: full year 2020 and fourth quarter results Key operating and financial results IIIQ IVQ Full Year 2020 2020 2019 % Ch. 2020 2019 % Ch. 43.00 Brent dated $/bbl 44.23 63.25 (30) 41.67 64.30 (35) 1.169 Average EUR/USD exchange rate 1.193 1.107 8 1.142 1.119 2 36.78 Brent dated €/bbl 37.08 57.13 (35) 36.49 57.44 (36) 95 PSV €/kcm 156 158 (1) 112 171 (35) 0.7 Standard Eni Refining Margin (SERM) $/bbl 0.2 4.2 (95) 1.7 4.3 (60) 1,701 Hydrocarbon production kboe/d 1,713 1,921 (11) 1,733 1,871 (7) 537 Adjusted operating profit (loss) ⁽ᵃ⁾⁽ᵇ⁾ € million 488 1,805 (73) 1,898 8,597 (78) 515 E&P 802 2,051 (61) 1,547 8,640 (82) 64 Global Gas & LNG Portfolio (GGP) (101) (46) (120) 326 193 69 21 R&M and Chemicals (104) (161) 35 6 21 (71) 57 Eni gas e luce, Power & Renewables 132 156 (15) 465 370 26 (153) Adjusted net profit (loss) ⁽ᵃ⁾⁽ᶜ⁾⁽ᵈ⁾ 66 546 (88) (742) 2,876 (126) (0.04) per share - diluted (€) 0.02 0.15 (0.21) 0.80 (503) Net profit (loss) ⁽ᶜ⁾⁽ᵈ⁾ (725) (1,891) (8,563) 148 (0.14) per share - diluted (€) (0.20) (0.53) (2.39) 0.04 1,774 Net cash before changes in working capital at replacement cost ⁽ᵉ⁾ 1,582 2,412 (34) 6,726 11,700 (43) 1,456 Net cash from operations 988 3,725 (73) 4,822 12,392 (61) 902 Net capital expenditure ⁽ᶠ⁾⁽ᵍ⁾ 1,206 2,154 (44) 4,970 7,734 (36) 14,525 Net borrowings before lease liabilities ex IFRS 16 11,568 11,477 1 11,568 11,477 1 19,853 Net borrowings after lease liabilities ex IFRS 16 16,586 17,125 (3) 16,586 17,125 (3) 36,533 Shareholders' equity including non-controlling interest 37,556 47,900 (22) 37,556 47,900 (22) 0.40 Leverage before lease liabilities ex IFRS 16 0.31 0.24 0.31 0.24 0.54 Leverage after lease liabilities ex IFRS 16 0.44 0.36 0.44 0.36 (a) Non-GAAP measure.
    [Show full text]