Family in the Process of Changes

PAPERS OF SOCIAL PEDAGOGY ARBEITEN ZUR SOZIALPAEDAGOGIK ТРУДЫ ПО СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКЕ Family in the process of changes ISSN 2392-3083 NR 2(5) / 2016 PSP, NR 02(5)/2016 FAMILY IN THE PROCESS OF CHANGES 2 Editorial EDITORS board Editor in Chief: Danuta Lalak Editorial staff: Aneta Ostaszewska Irena Dychawy-Rosner EDITORIAL COUNCIL Professor Arno Heimgartner, Universität Graz (Austria) Professor Franz Hamburger, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz (Germany) Professor Ewa Syrek, University of Silesia (Poland) Professor Maria Mendel, University of Gdansk (Poland) Professor Andrej Timonin, Nekrasov Kostroma State University (Russia) Professor Walentina Bassowa, Nekrasov Kostroma State University (Russia) Professor Dana Knotová, Masarykova Univerzita (Slovakia) Professor Olga Bezpalko, University Kyiv (Ukraine) Professor Peter Husak, Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University (Ukraine) PSP, NR 02(5)/2016 FAMILY IN THE PROCESS OF CHANGES 3 LIST OF REVIEWERS Elżbieta Budakowska, University of Warsaw (Poland) Judit Csoba, University of Debrecen (Hungary) Agnieszka Golczyńska-Grondas, University of Lodz (Poland) Elżbieta Górnikowska-Zwolak, University of Silesia (Poland) Ludmyła Gusak, Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University (Ukraine) Franz Hamburger, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Germany) Davina Höblich, Hochschule RheinMain - University of Applied Sciences (Germany) Petro Husak, Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University (Ukraine) Ewa Jarosz, University of Silesia in Katowice (Poland) Ewa Kantowicz, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (Poland) Barbara Kromolicka, University of Szczecin (Poland) Tomasz Kaźmierczak, University of Warsaw (Poland) Joanna Ostrouch-Kamińska, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (Poland) Ołeg Padałka, National Pedagogical University in Kyiv, National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine (Ukraine) Mikołaj Pawlak, University of Warsaw (Poland) Tadeusz Pilch, University of Warsaw (Poland) Katarzyna Stokłosa, University of Southern Denmark (Denmark) Jerzy Szmagalski, The Maria Grzegorzewska University in Warsaw (Poland) Dariusz Schmidt, University of Warsaw (Poland) Mikołaj Winiarski, University of Computer Sciences and Economics in Olsztyn (Poland) Matthias D. Witte, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Germany) PUBLISHER AND EDITORIAL OFFICE PAPERS OF SOCIAL PEDAGOGY Institute of Social Prevention and Resocialization University of Warsaw Ul. Podchorazych 20 00-721 Warszawa e-mail: [email protected] PSP, NR 02(5)/2016 FAMILY IN THE PROCESS OF CHANGES 4 Table INTRODUCTION of Contents Danuta Lalak TOPIC ISSUES 6 FAMILY MATTERS ARE NOT JUST DOMESTIC AFFAIRS: A PERSPECTIVE ON SOCIAL PEDAGOGY IN SOCIAL WORK Irena Dychawy Rosner 17 THE VISION OF THE FAMILY FUNCTIONING IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF YOUNG PEOPLE FROM DYSFUNCTIONAL ENVIRONMENTS Barbara Kołodziej 30 ISSUES IN EDUCATING CHILDREN: WHAT SHOULD BE CARED BY THE PARENTS? Nguyễn Duy Khang,Phan Thị Tuyết Vân 51 “WORDS HURT FOR LIFE” – LEGAL ASPECTS OF VERBAL PUNISHMENT OF CHILDREN Sylwia Różycka-Jaroś SUPPLEMENTS AND COMMENTS 64 PROFESSIONAL WORKING MOTHERS. ON THE SIDELINES OF THE PUBLICATION CONTEMPORARY WORK SPACES Katarzyna Rychlicka-Maraszek 68 PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE AS SOCIAL EDUCATIONAL CAPITAL Petro Husak, Ludmyła Gusak 75 THE SPECIFICITY OF ORAL HISTORY RESEARCH IN THE WARMIA AND MAZURY. THE CONCEPT OF INTERDISCIPLINARY PROJECT Izabela Lewandowska REVIEW 83 MARRY PATRICE ERDMANS, TIMOTHY BLACK (2015), BECOMING A TEEN MOM. LIFE BEFORE PREGNANCY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS OAKLAND , CALIFORNIA, PP. 330 Alicja Zbierzchowska CALL FOR PAPERS PSP, NR 02(5)/2016 FAMILY IN THE PROCESS OF CHANGES 5 Introduction Dear Readers, The twentieth century has been a time of many mod- ernist transformations within society. Mostly they affected family. The transition from a large family – a stable and multi-generational, struc- tured and strongly linked economically – to the nuclear family – alienat- ed from the environment, liquid and hybrid – has been a process that is not finished yet. We have entered the twenty-first century with a discourse of reproduction and a discourse of gender. Heteronormative or- der is questioned. These processes play an important role in a family’s life: its condition and functions. A sign of the times is the increasing accept- ance of homosexual families, partnerships, or the relocation of procrea- tion outside the family. The nuclear family, still the dominant form of family life, shrinks and / or takes the form of a dyad – childless couple or a single parent (usually the mother) with one child, or is being replaced by living all alone. The percentage of single and double households increases from year to year. Destabilization and deinstitutionalisation of family life have been recorded in the statistics for the last 20 years. Nevertheless, the research conducted in Poland, but also in other countries, show consistently that the family is the greatest value of young people’s individual hierarchy of values. The questions of family’s future and its condition, as well as questions of empowering and weaken- ing factors of the family’s internal ties seems to be justified. It is reasonable to ask about the new models of motherhood and fatherhood. Selected issues related to the family are discussed in the following pages of “Papers of Social Pedagogy”. With best wishes for the New Year 2017! PSP, NR 02(5)/2016 FAMILY IN THE PROCESS OF CHANGES 6 EN In the last few decades, the traditional concept of family has weak- ened while the development of numerous new constellations has gained a lot of attention. Convention sees family as a nuclear social formation, where heterosexual parents raise their children well. This view attests to the potential for healthy functioning in a variety of family arrangements, and to the stability of these social environments. In the turmoil of our rapidly changing world, the value of system orientation is changing and questions are being raised over what is an ordinary landscape of family life, its constellations and opti- mal functioning. This article raises family-relevant issues and discusses social pedagogy in family social work, particularly related to social care in Sweden intended for socially vul- nerable populations such as the elderly, members of minority ethnic groups, and persons with disabilities suffering from discrimination and social exclusion. It is concluded that – in these populations – the family constellation, be it traditional or modern, is not really the issue, since public social care service constructions have mostly replaced traditional caring relations within families with leveling institutional structures. The social pedagogy in family social work professional practice is conducted using socio-ecological approaches for assessment, treatment and service delivery, for the improvement of individual wellbe- ing referred to as the individual, social and sociopolitical life-world context. Family matters Key words: family, social pedagogy, social work, Sweden are not just domestic affairs: a perspective on social pedagogy in social work IRENA DYCHAWY ROSNER Malmö University, Sweden PSP, NR 02(5)/2016 FAMILY IN THE PROCESS OF CHANGES 7 Introduction Contemporary research recognises many factors that impact family as a social con- struction: established patterns of stereotypes and the portrayal of social groups, a family’s origin and friends, norms of interaction between various family members, and direct exposure to one another. It is noted that family shapes are constantly changing and come in a variety of forms re- lating to demographic trends, social policies, immigration patterns and cultural rules (Dominelli, 2004). From this perspective, a single definition does not exist. Social workers acknowledge that every family case presents limits and resources related to their living conditions that requires sit- uational knowledge, which also has to be connected to a broader society and social care system (Guidi, Meeuwisse and Sacaramuzzino, 2015). Furthermore, when situated in the diverse public institutional domain of the welfare state, a family construct operates within different family sys- tems, influenced mostly by different logic (e.g., family care, child care or elderly home care). Until recently, the recognised family form was a heterosexual married couple in which the man was the economic provider and the woman the carer. This mainstream concep- tualisation simultaneously normalises a particular way of viewing family and dismisses other structures as pathological. That may, for example, include extended cross generational family patterns, individuals living alone, or parents of the same gender – all of whom, by this, may be categorised as deviant (Peterson, 2013). These impacting factors may expose people to major problems, lead to disadvantages in social equality, and cause oppression, powerlessness and the need for support from the social agencies and social care services in a welfare regime. The focus of this paper originates from a presumption that social work interven- tions serves as a partial replacement of family care structures in relation to current social policy and professional schemes. The aim of this article is to shed light on the complexity of social pedagogy in family social work, and to reflect on the existing patterns of family constructs as social formations. The question is, to what extent the professional models of practice focus on per- son-centered approaches, and how the specific needs

Load more