Research Projects and Papers - a Compilation
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
AESA Based IPM – Brinjal
AESA BASED IPM Package No.22 AESA based IPM – Brinjal Pests Defenders Directorate of Plant Protection National Institute of Plant Health National Centre for Quarantine and Storage Management Integrated Pest Management N. H. IV, Faridabad, Haryana Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, A. P LBS Building, IARI Campus, New Delhi Department of Agriculture and Cooperation Ministry of Agriculture Government of India 1 The AESA based IPM - Brinjal, was compiled by the NIPHM working group under the Chairmanship of Dr. K. Satyagopal DG, NIPHM, and guidance of Shri. Utpal Kumar Singh JS (PP). The package was developed taking into account the advice of experts listed below on various occasions before finalization. NIPHM Working Group: Chairman : Dr. K. Satyagopal, IAS, Director General Vice-Chairmen : Dr. S. N. Sushil, Plant Protection Advisor : Dr. P. Jeyakumar, Director (PHM) Core Members : 1. Er. G. Shankar, Joint Director (PHE), Pesticide Application Techniques Expertise. 2. Dr. O. P. Sharma, Joint Director (A & AM), Agronomy Expertise. 3. Dr. Dhana Raj Boina, Assistant Director (PHM), Entomology Expertise. 4. Dr. Richa Varshney, Assistant Scientific Officer (PHM), Entomology Expertise. Other Members : 1. Dr. Satish Kumar Sain, Assistant Director (PHM), Pathology Expertise. 2. Dr. N. Srinivasa Rao, Assistant Director (RPM), Rodent Pest Management Expertise. 3 Dr. B. S. Sunanda, Assistant Scientific Officer (PHM), Nematology Expertise. Contributions by DPPQ&S Experts: 1. Shri. Ram Asre, Additional Plant Protection Advisor (IPM), 2. Dr. K. S. Kapoor, Deputy Director (Entomology), 3. Dr. Sanjay Arya, Deputy Director (Plant Pathology), 4. Dr. Subhash Kumar, Deputy Director (Weed Science) 5. Dr. C. S. Patni, Plant Protection Officer (Plant Pathology) Contributions by External Experts: 1. -
Assessment of Risks and Potential of Injection Techniques in Integrated Programs to Eradicate the Red Palm Weevil: Review and New Perspectives
Review Assessment of risks and potential of injection techniques in integrated programs to eradicate the red palm weevil: review and new perspectives Michel FERRY*, Susi GOMEZ INRA, Estación Phoenix, Assessment of risks and potential of injection techniques in integrated programs to Apartado 996, 03201 Elche, eradicate the red palm weevil: review and new perspectives. Spain, Abstract – Introduction. Plants develop mechanisms that allow them to compartmentalize injuries [email protected] that they suffer during their life. In trees, pruning and injection treatments must be used in accordance with precise rules to reduce risks resulting from the injuries created. Sealing in palms. Palms, con- trary to widespread belief, are quite capable of “healing” injuries (sealing); because of an anatomy quite different from trees, the sealing process in palms is much simpler. Compartmentalization of injection wounds. The controversy on the use of injection in trees is due essentially to initial mis- takes that have then been rectified. Injection in palms against the red palm weevil. For palms, for decades, this technique has been employed without problems and with great efficiency against various pests, including Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, the red palm weevil (RPW). Its use has been reserved for exceptional situations either to face abnormal pest proliferation, uncontrollable by other techniques, or to implement eradication programs. Integrated eradication program. In such a pro- gram, the main aim of injection treatments is preventive. With long-persistence insecticides, the number of treatments could be greatly reduced. The resulting savings in time and money would ena- ble the organization of the treatments of all the palms located in an infested area, and consequently the rapid eradication of the pest. -
Molecular Basis of Pheromonogenesis Regulation in Moths
Chapter 8 Molecular Basis of Pheromonogenesis Regulation in Moths J. Joe Hull and Adrien Fónagy Abstract Sexual communication among the vast majority of moths typically involves the synthesis and release of species-specifc, multicomponent blends of sex pheromones (types of insect semiochemicals) by females. These compounds are then interpreted by conspecifc males as olfactory cues regarding female reproduc- tive readiness and assist in pinpointing the spatial location of emitting females. Studies by multiple groups using different model systems have shown that most sex pheromones are synthesized de novo from acetyl-CoA by functionally specialized cells that comprise the pheromone gland. Although signifcant progress was made in identifying pheromone components and elucidating their biosynthetic pathways, it wasn’t until the advent of modern molecular approaches and the increased avail- ability of genetic resources that a more complete understanding of the molecular basis underlying pheromonogenesis was developed. Pheromonogenesis is regulated by a neuropeptide termed Pheromone Biosynthesis Activating Neuropeptide (PBAN) that acts on a G protein-coupled receptor expressed at the surface of phero- mone gland cells. Activation of the PBAN receptor (PBANR) triggers a signal trans- duction cascade that utilizes an infux of extracellular Ca2+ to drive the concerted action of multiple enzymatic steps (i.e. chain-shortening, desaturation, and fatty acyl reduction) that generate the multicomponent pheromone blends specifc to each species. In this chapter, we provide a brief overview of moth sex pheromones before expanding on the molecular mechanisms regulating pheromonogenesis, and con- clude by highlighting recent developments in the literature that disrupt/exploit this critical pathway. J. J. Hull (*) USDA-ARS, US Arid Land Agricultural Research Center, Maricopa, AZ, USA e-mail: [email protected] A. -
1 Testing of Garlic Based Bio-Pesticide on Insect Pests of Coconut (Cocus Nucifera L.)
TESTING OF GARLIC BASED BIO-PESTICIDE ON INSECT PESTS OF COCONUT (COCUS NUCIFERA L.) A REPORT 2008-2009 UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, GANDHI KRISHI VIGNAN KENDRA BANGALORE-560065 1 TESTING OF GARLIC BASED BIO-PESTICIDE ON INSECT PESTS OF COCONUT (COCUS NUCIFERA L.) A REPORT 2008-2009 UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, GANDHI KRISHI VIGNAN KENDRA BANGALORE-560065 2 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Dr. A. K. CHAKRAVARTHY PROFFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY UAS, GKVK, BANGALORE-560065 CO-INVESTIGATOR B.DODDABASAPPA COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE UAS, GKVK, BANGALORE-560065 3 TESTING OF GARLIC BASED BIO-PESTICIDE ON INSECT PESTS OF COCONUT (COCUS NUCIFERA L.) Introduction: In recent days organic farming plays an important role in getting quality food, since people are health conscious and many times asking for organic tender coconut and organic copra. Coconut (Cocus nucifera L.) is one of the important plantation crops cultivated across 19.5 lakh ha in India with a production of 14811 lakh nuts with an average of 7608 nuts. In Southern India, every house uses coconut almost every day for one or the other purpose. In addition to use of nuts for food and in temples for spiritual customs and ceremonies, in many parts of the world coconut oil is used as food, bio-fuel and lubricant. While it is one of the important commercial crops in India, it is the most important crop in the world. Keeping this in background the following objectives were framed to upate the pest management practices through suppressing the pests by bio- pesticides (Muralimohan, et al.,2008). In Karnataka ,this palm which is called Kalpavruksh, accounts for more than 18 percent of area in India, is predominantly grown in three agro-systems- hill and mountain (Districts of Hassan, Tumkur, South Chitradurga, Shimoga and Chikmagalur), Coastal (Mangalore, North Karnataka) and plains (Mysore, Mandya, Bangalore rural, Kolar). -
A-Razowski X.Vp:Corelventura
Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(3): 269-275, Kraków, 30 Sep., 2003 Reassessment of forewing pattern elements in Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) Józef RAZOWSKI Received: 15 March, 2003 Accepted for publication: 20 May, 2003 RAZOWSKI J. 2003. Reassessment of forewing pattern elements in Tortricidae (Lepidop- tera). Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(3): 269-275. Abstract. Forewing pattern elements of moths in the family Tortricidae are discussed and characterized. An historical review of the terminology is provided. A new system of nam- ing pattern elements is proposed. Key words. Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, forewing pattern, analysis, terminology. Józef RAZOWSKI, Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, S³awkowska 17, 31-016 Kraków, Poland. E-mail: razowski.isez.pan.krakow.pl I. INTRODUCTION Early tortricid workers such as HAWORTH (1811), HERRICH-SCHHÄFFER (1856), and others pre- sented the first terminology for forewing pattern elements in their descriptions of new species. Nearly a century later, SÜFFERT (1929) provided a more eclectic discussion of pattern elements for Lepidoptera in general. In recent decades, the common and repeated use of specific terms in de- scriptions and illustrations by FALKOVITSH (1966), DANILEVSKY and KUZNETZOV (1968), and oth- ers reinforced these terms in Tortricidae. BRADLEY et al. (1973) summarized and commented on all the English terms used to describe forewing pattern elements. DANILEVSKY and KUZNETZOV (1968) and KUZNETZOV (1978) analyzed tortricid pattern elements, primarily Olethreutinae, dem- onstrating the taxonomic significance of the costal strigulae in that subfamily. For practical pur- poses they numbered the strigulae from the forewing apex to the base, where the strigulae often become indistinct. KUZNETZOV (1978) named the following forewing elements in Tortricinae: ba- sal fascia, subterminal fascia, outer fascia (comprised of subapical blotch and outer blotch), apical spot, and marginal line situated in the marginal fascia (a component of the ground colour). -
Pest and Diseases in Mango (Mangifera Indica L.) J
PEST AND DISEASES IN MANGO (MANGIFERA INDICA L.) J. González-Fernández, J.I. Hormaza IHSM la Mayora CSIC-UMA, 29750 Algarrobo, Malaga, Spain EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In this work, we review the most important pests and diseases that affect mango production worldwide as well as the main measures implemented to control them. Pests and diseases are the main factors that can impact sustainable mango fruit production in the tropics and subtropics worldwide. Commercial cultivation of mango, characterized by expansion to new areas, changing crop management, replacement of varieties and increased chemical interventions, has altered significantly the pest and disease community structure in this crop in the different mango producing regions. In addition, climate change is inducing the emergence of new pests and, whereas globalization and trade liberalization have created wide opportunities for mango commercialization growth, at the same time, this can result in faster dispersion of pests and diseases among different mango growing areas if proper sanitary measures are not implemented. This review covers different topics related to pests and diseases in mango. First, a thorough description of the main pests and diseases that affect mango is provided. Second, the different approaches used in different mango producing countries for chemical and biological control are described. Third, recommendations for appropriate mango management techiques that include integrated pest and disease management, reduction in the use of chemicals and the implementation of a good monitoring and surveillance system to help control the main pests and diseases, are also discussed. Finally, the current knowledge on agrohomeopathy and Korean Natural Farming is analyzed and recommendations on future lines of research to optimize mango pest and disease control are discussed. -
The Microlepidopterous Fauna of Sri Lanka, Formerly Ceylon, Is Famous
ON A COLLECTION OF SOME FAMILIES OF MICRO- LEPIDOPTERA FROM SRI LANKA (CEYLON) by A. DIAKONOFF Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden With 65 text-figures and 18 plates CONTENTS Preface 3 Cochylidae 5 Tortricidae, Olethreutinae, Grapholitini 8 „ „ Eucosmini 23 „ „ Olethreutini 66 „ Chlidanotinae, Chlidanotini 78 „ „ Polyorthini 79 „ „ Hilarographini 81 „ „ Phricanthini 81 „ Tortricinae, Tortricini 83 „ „ Archipini 95 Brachodidae 98 Choreutidae 102 Carposinidae 103 Glyphipterigidae 108 A list of identified species no A list of collecting localities 114 Index of insect names 117 Index of latin plant names 122 PREFACE The microlepidopterous fauna of Sri Lanka, formerly Ceylon, is famous for its richness and variety, due, without doubt, to the diversified biotopes and landscapes of this beautiful island. In spite of this, there does not exist a survey of its fauna — except a single contribution, by Lord Walsingham, in Moore's "Lepidoptera of Ceylon", already almost a hundred years old, and a number of small papers and stray descriptions of new species, in various journals. The authors of these papers were Walker, Zeller, Lord Walsingham and a few other classics — until, starting with 1905, a flood of new descriptions 4 ZOOLOGISCHE VERHANDELINGEN I93 (1982) and records from India and Ceylon appeared, all by the hand of Edward Meyrick. He was almost the single specialist of these faunas, until his death in 1938. To this great Lepidopterist we chiefly owe our knowledge of all groups of Microlepidoptera of Sri Lanka. After his death this information stopped abruptly. In the later years great changes have taken place in the tropical countries. We are now facing, alas, the disastrously quick destruction of natural bio- topes, especially by the reckless liquidation of the tropical forests. -
Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier Area, Swellendam
Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier area, Swellendam by Johannes Philippus Groenewald Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Science in Conservation Ecology in the Faculty of AgriSciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael J. Samways Co-supervisor: Dr. Ruan Veldtman December 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis, for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Ecology, is my own work that have not been previously published in full or in part at any other University. All work that are not my own, are acknowledge in the thesis. ___________________ Date: ____________ Groenewald J.P. Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements Firstly I want to thank my supervisor Prof. M. J. Samways for his guidance and patience through the years and my co-supervisor Dr. R. Veldtman for his help the past few years. This project would not have been possible without the help of Prof. H. Geertsema, who helped me with the identification of the Lepidoptera and other insect caught in the study area. Also want to thank Dr. K. Oberlander for the help with the identification of the Oxalis species found in the study area and Flora Cameron from CREW with the identification of some of the special plants growing in the area. I further express my gratitude to Dr. Odette Curtis from the Overberg Renosterveld Project, who helped with the identification of the rare species found in the study area as well as information about grazing and burning of Renosterveld. -
VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY and INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and Monitoring Insectariums! !
! VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY AND INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and monitoring insectariums! ! Prepared for : GWRDC Regional - SA Central (Adelaide Hills, Currency Creek, Kangaroo Island, Langhorne Creek, McLaren Vale and Southern Fleurieu Wine Regions) By : Mary Retallack Date : August 2011 ! ! ! !"#$%&'(&)'*!%*!+& ,- .*!/'01)!.'*&----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&2 3-! "&(')1+&'*&4.*%5"/0&#.'0.4%/+.!5&-----------------------------------------------------------------------------&6! ! &ABA <%5%+3!C0-72D0E2!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!F! &A&A! ;D,!*2!G*0.*1%-2*3,!*HE0-3#+3I!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!J! &AKA! ;#,2!0L!%+D#+5*+$!G*0.*1%-2*3,!*+!3D%!1*+%,#-.!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!B&! 7- .*+%)!"/.18+&--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&,2! ! ! KABA ;D#3!#-%!*+2%53#-*MH2I!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!BN! KA&A! O3D%-!C#,2!0L!L0-H*+$!#!2M*3#G8%!D#G*3#3!L0-!G%+%L*5*#82!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!&P! KAKA! ?%8%53*+$!3D%!-*$D3!2E%5*%2!30!E8#+3!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!&B! 9- :$"*!.*;&5'1/&.*+%)!"/.18&-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&3<! -
Insect Pests of Vegetables
DATE- 18/03/2020 (LECTURE 3) Insect Pests of Vegetables Pests of brinjal Shoot and fruit borer (Leuciniodes orbonalis Guenee, Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) Key Identification- The Major host plants of the pest is Brinjal This pest is reported from regions of brinjal cultivation in Africa, South of the Sahara, and South-East Asia including India, Bangladesh, Srilanka, China and Philippines. Young caterpillars are creamy white, while full-grown are light pinkish and measure about 18-23 mm in length. The moth is medium sized with white wings having triangular brown and red markings on the forewings. The moth measures bout 20-22 mm across the wings. Life cycle- A female moth lays about 80-120 creamy white eggs, singly or in batches of 2-4 on the underside of leaves, on green stems, flowers buds or the calyces of fruits during its life span of 2-5 days. The incubation period is 3-6 days. The young caterpillars bore into the tender shoots near the growing points, flower buds or the fruits. There are five larval instars and mature in 14-20 days, depending on the prevailing temperature and humidity. A single caterpillar may destroy as many as 4-6 fruits. The larva comes out of the damaged shoot or fruit and pupates in a tough gray cocoon in soil or plant debris. The pupal period is 6-11 days. During the active season, the total life cycle is completed in 20-43 days. There are five overlapping generations in a year. Damage- The larvae bore into the petiole and midribs of large leaves and tender shoots and cause wilting. -
Subfamily Dolichoderinae DISCUSSION
_____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2009__________ 187 Subfamily Dolichoderinae *Linepithema humile Meyr, 1868 Nooshahr and Noor, September 2005. *Tapinoma festae Emery, 1925 Fereydonkenar and Chalus, November 2001. *Tapinoma karavievi Emery, 1925 Chalus and Tonekabon, June 2004. Tapinoma simrothi subsp. Karavievi Emery, 1925 Behshahr and Neka, August 2001. DISCUSSION The results of this survey indicated that the subfamily Myrmicinae is more diverse than the two other subfamilies with 20 species. Majer (1986) classified ants into status categories of dominant; subdominant, which can attain dominant status in the absence of dominant ants; and nondominant, which live within or between the territories of dominant ants. Dominant ants include species that are most conspicuously useful for biological control. Good evidence shows that ants prey on the egg of pest species in many different countries and habitats. For example, in Sri Lanka virtually 100% of eggs of Opisina arenosella were removed within 24 h by Monomorium floricola. Solenopsis invicta was part of a complex killing of over 70% of eggs of Heliothis virescens in 24 h on cotton where ratios of predators to prey ranging from 2: 1 to 200: 1 seem able to prevent significant pest damage. On sugar cane, over 90% of eggs and small larvae of Castnia licus and 92% of eggs of Eldana saccharina were killed by ants. Pheidole spp. are major predators in complexes that can kill over 95% of eggs of Alabama argillacea and some 80% of Diabrotica spp. eggs in the soil (Way & Khoo, 1992). Therefore, ants alone or as an important part of predator complex can cause very large mortalities of eggs and so can contribute importantly to natural control (Jaffe et al., 1990). -
Major Insect Pests of Brinjal and Their Management
Popular Article Popular Kheti Volume -4, Issue-2 (April -June), 2016 Available online at www.popularkhet i.com © 2016 popularkheti.com eISSN: 2321-0001 Major Insect Pests of Brinjal a nd Their Management Kanchan G. Padwal 1*, Sameer Kumar Singh 1, Sujeet Kumar Sharma 2 1Department of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology Institute of Agricultural Sciences , Banaras Hi ndu University, Varanasi (UP) 2Division of Plant Protection , Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi (UP) *Email of corresponding author : [email protected] Brinjal is the most common and extensively grown all over the country and occupy an important place in the food basket of Indian consumers and attacked by many insect pests. Among them some have been problem for brinjal cultivation. The present article gives emphasis on the identification, life cycle, nature of damage and susta inable management of major insect pests of the brinjal. Introduction Brinjal ( Solanum melongena L.), also known as egg plant is referred as “King of vegetables”, originated from India and now grown as a vegetable throughout the tropical, sub -tropical and warm temperate areas of the world. Eggplant contains nutrients such as dietary fiber, folate, ascorbic acid, vitamin K, niacin, vitamin B6, pantothenic acid, potassium, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus , and copper; the nutrients that it contributes to the diets of the poor are especially important during times when other vegetables are in short supply. The crop is attacked by number of insect pests including Leafhopper (Amrasca devastans ), aphid ( Aphis gossypii ), white fly ( Bemisia tabaci ) and shoot and fruit borer ( Leucinodes orbonalis ), Hadda beetle (Epilachna vigintioctopunctata ), Stem borer ( Euzophera perticella ), Lace wing bug ( Urentius hystricellus ), Brinjal brown leaf hopper ( Cestius phycitis ), Leaf roller ( Eublemma olivacea ).Besides these insect pests brinjal is also attacked by several other pests including mites, which result in significant losses in the yield.