DOCSLIB.ORG

The United Republic of Tanzania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The United Republic of Tanzania THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA Public Disclosure Authorized Ministry of Agriculture Expanding Rice Production Project (ERPP) Public Disclosure Authorized RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) FOR REHABILITATION WORKS OF KILANGALI SEED FARM IN KILOSA DISTRICT, MOROGORO REGION Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by: Nyinisaeli K. Palangyo, P.O. Box 33165, DAR ES SALAAM Email:palangyon@gmail.com/nyinisaeli@ikusura.co.tz Mobile: +255 784 351937 or +255 715 351937 Public Disclosure Authorized MAY 2019 Expanding Rice Production Project (ERPP) TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................... v 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background .................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Land Dispute at Kilangali Seed Farm .................................................................... 1 1.3 Objective of the RAP ................................................................................................ 2 1.4 The Scope of RAP Activities ................................................................................... 2 1.5 Organization of the RAP Report ............................................................................ 3 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 4 2.1 Project Location......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Overview of Project Components .......................................................................... 5 2.2.1 Component 1: Sustainable Seed Systems .............................................................. 5 2.2.2 Component 2: improving crop productivity through better irrigation and crop management ..................................................................................................... 5 2.2.3 Component 3: Innovative Marketing Strategies .................................................. 5 2.2.4 Component 4: Project Management and Coordination ...................................... 5 2.3 Project Components Requiring Resettlement and Compensation .................... 5 2.4 Land Requirement for Kilangali ERPP Sub Project ............................................. 6 2.5 Project Activities ....................................................................................................... 6 2.5.1 Construction Activities ............................................................................................ 6 2.5.2 Operational Activities .............................................................................................. 7 3 ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS FROM LAND ACQUISITION .... 8 3.1 Types of Impacts Assessed ...................................................................................... 8 3.2 Physical Impacts ....................................................................................................... 8 3.2.1 Loss of Residential and Annexed Structures ........................................................ 8 3.3 Economic Impacts ..................................................................................................... 8 3.3.1 Loss of Productive Land .......................................................................................... 8 3.3.2 Loss of Seasonal ........................................................................................................ 8 3.4 Social Impacts ............................................................................................................ 8 3.4.1 Loss of Communal Structures or Facilities ........................................................... 8 3.4.2 Disruption of Livelihoods ....................................................................................... 9 4 SOCIO ECONOMIC STUDIES ............................................................................. 10 4.1 General Socio-Economic Baseline of Kilangali Village ..................................... 10 4.1.1 Administrative Set Up of Kilangali Village ........................................................ 10 4.1.2 Political Situation in the Project area ................................................................... 10 4.1.3 Population in Kilangali Village ............................................................................ 10 4.1.4 Income Level ........................................................................................................... 10 4.1.5 Agricultural Practices............................................................................................. 11 4.1.6 Livestock Keeping .................................................................................................. 11 4.1.7 Commercial and Industrial Activities ................................................................. 11 4.1.8 Other Institutions.................................................................................................... 11 4.1.9 Housing Conditions ............................................................................................... 11 4.1.10 Ethnic groups .......................................................................................................... 11 4.1.11 Social Services in Kilangali Area .......................................................................... 11 4.2 Socio-Economic Baseline of PAPs ........................................................................ 12 4.2.1 Number of PAPs ..................................................................................................... 12 4.2.2 Gender Distribution ............................................................................................... 12 4.2.3 Livelihood Activities .............................................................................................. 13 Draft RAP Report Page ii Expanding Rice Production Project (ERPP) 4.2.4 Income and Expenditure ....................................................................................... 13 4.2.5 Land ownership ...................................................................................................... 13 4.2.6 Housing and House Assets ................................................................................... 14 5 ELIGIBILITY AND ENTITLEMENT ................................................................... 15 5.1 Eligibility Criteria for Defining Categories PAPs .............................................. 15 5.2 Cut-Off Date ............................................................................................................ 15 5.3 Eligibility for Community Compensation .......................................................... 15 5.4 Categories of PAPs ................................................................................................. 16 5.4.1 Affected Individual/Household .......................................................................... 16 5.4.2 Affected Communities ........................................................................................... 16 5.4.3 Vulnerable PAPs ..................................................................................................... 16 5.5 Project Affected Persons in Kilangali .................................................................. 16 5.6 Entitlement Matrix ................................................................................................. 17 6 VALUATION OF RESETTLEMENT IMPACTS ................................................ 19 6.1 Main Economic Impacts ........................................................................................ 19 6.2 Method for Valuation and Compensation for Land .......................................... 19 6.3 Individual Sizes of Land to be Compensated ..................................................... 19 6.4 Vacating of the Compensated Land ..................................................................... 20 7 RESETTLEMENT MEASURES ............................................................................. 21 7.1 Overview ................................................................................................................. 21 7.2 Resettlement Measures according to MOU dated 28.11.2017 .......................... 21 7.2.1 Land Compensation ............................................................................................... 21 7.2.2 Cash Compensation ............................................................................................... 21 7.3 Livelihood Improvement Measures ..................................................................... 21 7.3.1 Provision of Temporary Cultivation Land ......................................................... 21 7.3.2 Provision of Seeds .................................................................................................. 22 7.3.3 Construction of Irrigation Canals ......................................................................... 22 7.3.4 Provision of Access Roads and Foot Paths ......................................................... 22 8 STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION .................................................................... 23 8.1 Overview ................................................................................................................. 23 8.2 Input from Consulted Stakeholders ..................................................................... 23
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park
    Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park Incorporating a Socio-Economic Monitoring Plan for 29 Villages North and East of the Udzungwa Mountains National Park Paul Harrison November 2006 WORLD WIDE FUND FOR NATURE TANZANIA PROGRAMME OFFICE (WWF-TPO) WITH SUPPORT FROM WWF NORWAY AND NORAD Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park Report compiled by Paul Harrison, Kilimanyika Produced on behalf of WWF Tanzania Programme Office, P. O. Box 63117, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Co-Financed by NORAD and WWF Norway All photographs © Kilimanyika, unless otherwise stated. A series of photographs accompanying this report may be obtained by contacting Kilimanyika The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of WWF Tanzania, WWF Norway or NORAD. Bankipore House High Street Brill, Bucks HP18 9ST, UK Tel. +44 7739 803 704 Email: paul@kilimanyika.com Web: www.kilimanyika.com 2 Paul Harrison/Kilimanyika for WWF Tanzania Table of Contents Tables and Figures..............................................................................................................................................4 Abbreviations and Acronyms .............................................................................................................................5 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • A Contextual Analysis for Village Land Use Planning in Tanzania's
    A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Tanzania’s Bagamoyo and Chalinze districts, Pwani region and Mvomero and Kilosa districts, Morogoro region Sustainable Rangeland Management Project ILRI PROJECT REPORT ISBN: 92-9146-586-0 The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) works to improve food and nutritional security and reduce poverty in developing countries through research for efficient, safe and sustainable use of livestock. Co-hosted by Kenya and Ethiopia, it has regional or country offices and projects in East, South and Southeast Asia as well as Central, East, Southern and West Africa. ilri.org CGIAR is a global agricultural research partnership for a food-secure future. Its research is carried out by 15 research centres in collaboration with hundreds of partner organizations. cgiar.org A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania i ii A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Tanzania’s Bagamoyo and Chalinze districts, Pwani region and Mvomero and Kilosa districts, Morogoro region Sustainable Rangeland Management Project Emmanuel Sulle and Wilbard Mkama Editor: Fiona Flintan (International Livestock Research Institute) July 2019 A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania iii ©2019 International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) ILRI thanks all donors and organizations which globally support its work through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund This publication is copyrighted by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). It is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the State of Pastoralists' Human Rights in Tanzania
    REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] Cover Picture: Maasai warriors dancing at the initiation ceremony of Mr. Kipulelia Kadege’s children in Handeni District, Tanga Region, April 2006. PAICODEO Tanzania Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark 1 REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro-Rural, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] PARAKUIYO PASTORALISTS INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION-(PAICODEO) Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark i REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 Researchers Legal and Development Consultants Limited (LEDECO Advocates) Writer Adv. Clarence KIPOBOTA (Advocate of the High Court) Publisher Parakuiyo Pastoralists Indigenous Community Development Organization © PAICODEO March, 2013 ISBN: 978-9987-9726-1-6 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... vii FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................viii Legal Status and Objectives of PAICODEO ...........................................................viii Vision ......................................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publication
    BRIEFING NOTE March 2015 ETHNIC VIOLENCE IN MOROGORO REGION IN TANZANIA n early 2015, Morogoro Region of Tanzania was the scene of deadly violence targeting minority Maasai and Datoga pasto- Iralist groups,1 which raised concerns in Parliament that the assaults could descend into ethnic based violence and spread across the country2. These assaults are said to be instigated by public figures with interests in acquiring land3. State authori- ties have not intervened to protect Maasai and Datoga citizens; rather police protection has been provided to others who are illegally cultivating officially registered Maasai village land. The violent episodes experienced since mid-January 2015 follow on from a decade of poor governance in Morogoro Region, with illegal eviction and dispossession of Maasai and Datoga citizens accompanied by human rights violations. None of these offences have been addressed despite high court rulings and numerous commissions of enquiry4. This brief provides a review of the violent and often deadly attacks on Maasai and Datoga citizens in Morogoro Region, committed between 15 January and the end of February 2015 as well as recommendations to duty bearers and other stakeholders. The brief is informed by civil society organisations5, official records of the Tanzanian Parliament and the media, and reference will be made where possible6. Since January 15, assaults have led to between 6 and 15 deaths (numbers still to be confirmed7) and many people have been injured and robbed. Six Maasai women were raped, 38 Maasai homesteads on village land were burned to the ground and 77 cattle were stolen. Currently 266 men, women and children are living in Mabwegere Village (Kilosa District of Morogoro Region) without food, shelter or protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned PDF[6.62
    INCEPTION REPORT Domestic Water Supply Programme Morogoro Region DHV CONSULTANTS B.V. 10 October 1993 TABLE OF CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Plan of Operations 2 1.2 Terms of Reference for the Inception Period 2 2. ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED WITH SUPPORT FROM CONSULTANTS 3 2.1 Finalization of the Plan of Operations 3 2.2 Step-by-step Implementation Procedure 4 2.3 Programme Implementation Management Structure 5 2.3.1 User group, village, divisional and district level 5 2.3.2 Regional level 5 2.3.3 National level 5 2.3.4 Parent ministry 6 2.4 Implementation Capacity of Districts 6 2.5 Framework for Mobilization Campaigns 9 2.6 Framework for Participation of Women 11 2.7 Performance Status and Institutional Requirements of Piped Systems 13 2.7.1 Performance status 13 2.7.2 Institutional requirements 15 2.8 Management Information System 16 2.9 Administrative and Monitoring System 17 2.9.1 Accounting system 17 2.9.2 Monitoring 19 2.9.3 Value-for-money auditing 20 2.9.4 External review and evaluation 20 2.10 Finalization of Activities from Previous Programme Period 20 3. CONSULTANTS' SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES 22 3.1 Identification of Training Needs 22 3.2 Identification of Available Training Capacities and Institutions 25 3.3 Continuation of Health and Sanitation Education 26 3.4 Private Sector 26 3.5 Research and Studies 27 3.6 Work Plans and Budgets 29 APPENDTX 1 Terms of Reference for the Inception Period APPENDIX II Health Checklist APPENDIX III Step by step Implementation Procedure APPENDIX IV Day-to-day Programme Managers APPENDIX V District
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Taxation and Tax Administration in Tanzania
    Local government taxation and tax administration in Tanzania Odd-Heige Fjeldstad and Joseph Semboja R 1999: 3 Recent Reports R1998:2 SURKHE, Astri et aL. Humanitarian assistance and conflict. Report prep are d for the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Bergen, 1998. (Price NOK 90 + postage) R 1998: 3 TJORE, Gro Protective strategies in the 1990s: A review of the policy discourses in UNHCR and the executive committee. Bergen, 1998. (Price NOK 90 + postage) R 1998: 4 DIA, Mona Boikott til hvilken pris? Barns situasjon i Irak og Burundi. Rapport for Redd Barna. Bergen, 1998 (Price NOK 90 + postage) R 1998: 5 NORDAs, Hildegunn Kyvik Macmood, a macroeconomic model for the Tanzanian economy. Bergen, 1998 (Price NOK 50 + postage ) R1998:6 NORDAs, Hildegunn Kyvik Criteria for general budget support and general sector support. Report commissioned by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Bergen, 1998 (Price NOK 50 + postage) R 1998: 7 BJERKELAND, Kristin M. Korrupsjon. En studie av skatteadministrasjonen i Tanzania. Bergen, 1998, 102 pp. (Price NOK 90 + postage) R 1999: L NORDAS, Hildegunn Kyvik The impact of the financial and economic crisis in Asia on Norway's major development partners. Bergen, 1999,29 pp. (Price NOK 50 + postage) R 1999: 2 NORDAs, Hildegunn Kyvik med bidrag av Inge Tvedten og Ame Wiig Effekter i mottakerlandene av norske petroleumsinvesteringer med hovedvekt på Angola. Bergen, 1999,39 pp. (Price NOK 50 + postage) A complete list of publications and Annual Report available free of charge For priced publications: Surfacemail (B-economique) free with prepaid orders. For ainnail (A-prioritaire) outside the Nordic countries add 20% Four easyways to pay: Cheque, issued in Norwegian kroner Post office giro, paid by International Giro: 0808 5352661 SWIFT: DNBANOBB, Den norske Bank no: 5201.05.42308 Credit card: VISA on1y Order from: Chr.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Farmer Productivity Through Increased Access to Draught Power Opportunities
    MOVEK Development Solution SMALL FARMER PRODUCTIVITY THROUGH INCREASED ACCESS TO DRAUGHT POWER OPPORTUNITIES Consultancy Report Stakeholder mapping in Morogoro region December 2008 (Final Report) ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. The Department for International Development (DfID has been a major supporter of natural resource research through its Renewable Natural Resource Research Strategy (RNRRS) which ran from 1995 to 2006. The results realized through such initiatives have enormous potential to alleviate poverty, promote economic growth, and mitigate the environmental problem. Unfortunately these efforts were not able to produce the expected results. 2. Within this reality, Research Into Use (RIU) programme has been conceived to meet this challenge. The approach used by RIU programme is slightly different from previous approaches since it has shifted its emphasis away from the generation of new knowledge to the ways in which knowledge is put into productive use 3. To complement the innovation system, the RIU programme intended to work with a network of partners (innovation platforms) working on common theme and using research knowledge in ways it hasn’t been used before to generate improved goods and services for the benefit of the poor. 4. To start the RIU programme in Tanzania identified three innovation platforms, three farm products in three regions as pilot domains. One of the platforms is access to draught power which is thought to enhance productivity of small holder farmers through increased access to and capacity to utilize draught power opportunities in Ulanga, Kilombero, Kilosa, and Mvomero districts 5. This report is based on the findings of the mapping study conducted in Ulanga, Kilombero, Kilosa and Mvomero districts which overlaped to Morogoro municipality 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Morogoro Health Abstract 2005/2006
    ISBN 9987-9087-1-3 The United Republic of Tanzania Prime Minister’s Office Regional Administration and Local Government Morogoro Region MOROGORO HEALTH ABSTRACT 2005/2006 June 2006 Morogoro Health Project April 2001 – March 2007 The United Republic of Tanzania Prime Minister’s Office Regional Administration and Local Government Morogoro Region MOROGORO HEALTH ABSTRACT 2005/2006 Morogoro Health Abstract was produced by the collaboration of Tanzanian and Japanese experts with Financial Assistance and Technical Cooperation to Morogoro Region by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). i Contents Page • Foreword ii • Statement From Morogoro Health Project Chief Advisor iii • Acknowledgement v • Abbreviations and Acronyms vi • Executive Summary viii Chapter I. Introduction 1 Chapter II. Health Mapping 4 Chapter III. Basic Abstracts 7 III.1 Human Resources Information 7 III.2 Health Facilities Information 8 III.3 Health Services Information 11 III.4 Diseases Information 18 III.5 Health Commodities Information 31 III.6 Health Management Information 33 Chapter VI. Focused Abstracts 34 Chapter V. Integrated Supportive Supervision 36 Annexes (I – IX) come after page 38 In Future Issue: Health Trends will start: • Trend of Human Resources in Morogoro Region • Trend of HF Distribution in Morogoro Region • Trend of Disease Distribution in Morogoro Region • Trend of Health Budget in Morogoro Region MHA 2005/2006 ii FOREWORD The Morogoro Regional Secretariat welcomes the Morogoro Health Abstract [MHA]. We believe that the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare will also appreciate that their concept of introducing Health Statistics Abstract has given an offspring in one of the Regions in the country. The Morogoro Health Abstract 2005/2006 is a summary of selected health statistical information available in the Region at the time of the preparation of the Abstract, that is 2006 June.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Agricultural Information for Women Farmers in Hai and Kilosa Districts, Tanzania THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfill
    Sources of Agricultural Information for Women Farmers in Hai and Kilosa Districts, Tanzania THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Elizabeth Lucas Isaya, B.S. Graduate Program in Agricultural and Extension Education The Ohio State University 2015 Master's Examination Committee: Dr. Robert Agunga, Advisor Dr. Robert J. Birkenholz Copyright by Elizabeth Lucas Isaya 2015 ABSTRACT This study investigated sources of agricultural information used by women farmers in Tanzania. Women farmers constitute the majority of farmers in Tanzania. Enabling them to increase food production will help achieve the government’s goals of achieving food security and agro-based industrialization. However, it is not clear where women farmers obtain information on modern farming methods. Knowing these sources will enable the Tanzanian government and international aid organizations channel information directed toward women farmers through those sources. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify women farmer’s sources of information in agriculture. Due to limited funding and time constraints, the study involved a survey of 300 women farmers in Hai and Kilosa districts of Kilimanjaro and Morogoro Regions, respectively. The survey was completed using an interview schedule. Of the 300 respondents sampled, 288 provided usable data for the study yielding a response rate of 96%. Six research objectives guided this study, namely: (a) examine the demographic characteristics of women farmers in Tanzania; (b) describe sources of information on modern farming methods for women farmers; (c) assess innovative farming methods adopted by women farmers; (d) examine women farmers’ access to and use of ICTs; (e) examine women farmers’ access to and use of agricultural extension agents; and (f) examine other challenges facing women farmers in Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Kilombero Sugar Company Ltd. in Tanzania
    Case Study: Kilombero Sugar Company Ltd. in Tanzania Prepared for Landesa’s Responsible Investments in Property and Land Project Landesa – February 2017 Case Study: Kilombero Sugar Company Ltd. in Tanzania. Prepared for Landesa’s Responsible Investments in Property and Land (RIPL) Project February 2017 Disclaimer: The authors' views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department for International Development, Kilombero Sugar Company Ltd., or Illovo Sugar Group. Contact Lukasz Czerwinski at lukaszc@landesa.org with any questions. Landesa is a U.S.-based international NGO that partners with governments, local organizations, and corporations to improve land laws, policies, and practices, with the primary goal of improving land tenure security, especially for the rural poor. Landesa specialists have land property rights experience in over 50 countries throughout Africa, Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and the former Soviet Union. Case Study: Kilombero Sugar Company Ltd. in Tanzania: Prepared for Landesa’s Responsible Investments in Property and Land (RIPL) Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................... 3 Background on the Responsible Investments in Property and Land Project…..…3 Tanzania Case Study: Kilombero Sugar Company Ltd.………………………………....3 Key Findings………………………………………………………………………………….……………3 Case Study Background ............................................................................... 5 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Factors Leading to Conflicts Among Agropastoralist and Farming Communities in Morogoro Region, Tanzania, and Their Implications for Wellbeing
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Understanding the Factors Leading to Conflicts among Agropastoralist and Farming Communities in Morogoro region, Tanzania, and their implications for wellbeing A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University by Dennis Rugeiyamu Rweyemamu Lincoln University 2019 Abstract In Africa, access to resources such as land, water, forest and wildlife reserve areas is a key factor for sustainable development. The scarcity and degradation of these resources in rural environments threatens human security, leading to conflicts. Tanzania is a developing country in the East Africa, where nearly 70% of the land is village land supporting 80% of the population as farmers and agropastoralists. Agropastoralists practice a production system in which they depend (>50% of income generation and sustenance) on livestock, with the remaining portion on crop farming for food. This system entails some family members seasonally travelling large distances with their stock in search of water and pasture for grazing, while others remain at home and practice crop farming during the growing season.
    [Show full text]
  • United Republic of Tanzania Kilosa District Investment Profile
    United Republic of Tanzania President’s Office Regional Administration and Local Government Kilosa District Council Kilosa District Investment Profile Opportunities and Promotion Strategies April 2020 United Republic of Tanzania President’s Office Regional Administration and Local Government Kilosa District Council Kilosa District Investment Profile Opportunities and Promotion Strategies April 2020 Kilosa District Investment Profile Opportunities and Promotion Strategies Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................iii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS....................................................................................v FOREWORD ........................................................................................................ vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ................................................................................... xvi SECTION 1: REASONS FOR INVESTING IN KILOSA DISTRICT COUNCIL .....................1 CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................... 1 COMPETITIVE PROFILE OF KILOSA DISTRICT COUNCIL ..........................1 1.1 Location and Accessibility ...................................................................1 1.2 Land Area and Administrative Units ................................................3 1.3 Population ................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]