DOCSLIB.ORG

Lower Turner Groundwater Allocation Limit Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lower Turner Groundwater Allocation Limit Report Lower Turner groundwater allocation limit report Method used to set an allocation limit and licensing rules for the lower Turner alluvial aquifer Looking after all our water needs SCT_Online Print_Final_A4.indd 1 31/05/10 11:08 AM Lower Turner groundwater allocation limit report Method used to set an allocation limit and licensing rules for the lower Turner alluvial aquifer Looking after all our water needs Department of Water Water resource allocation and planning series Report no. 50 June 2011 Department of Water 168 St Georges Terrace Perth Western Australia 6000 Telephone +61 8 6364 7600 Facsimile +61 8 6364 7601 National Relay Service 133 677 www.water.wa.gov.au © Government of Western Australia 2011 June 2011 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Water. ISSN 1327-8428 (print) ISSN 1834-2620 (online) ISBN 978-1-921789-66-3 (print) ISBN 978-1-921789-67-0 (online) Acknowledgements The Department of Water would like to thank the following for their contribution to this publication: Mike Braimbridge, Darryl Abbott, Fiona Lynn, Michelle Antao, Robyn Loomes, Emily Said, Hazli Koomberi and Chris O’Boy. The Department of Water would also like to thank the Kariyarra traditional owners and the Pilbara Native Title Service for their assistance with identifying the cultural values of the study area. For more information about this report, contact: Allocation Planning Section Department of Water Telephone 08 6364 7600 Email [email protected] Disclaimer This document has been published by the Department of Water. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the Department of Water and its employees are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained before applying the information contained in this document to particular circumstances. This publication is available from our website <www.water.wa.gov.au> or for those with special needs it can be made available in alternative formats such as audio, large print, or Braille. Lower Turner groundwater allocation limit report Water resource allocation and planning, no. 50 Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................... v 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Scope of this document ......................................................................................................1 1.2 What is an allocation limit? ................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Process used for setting the lower Turner alluvial aquifer allocation limit ......................... 1 1.4 Need for a water licence .....................................................................................................2 2 The lower Turner resource ...................................................................................... 3 2.1 Resource boundary ............................................................................................................3 2.2 Hydrogeology ......................................................................................................................5 3 Assessment ............................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Assessment panel ..............................................................................................................7 3.2 Aquifer properties ...............................................................................................................7 3.3 Groundwater-dependent ecosystems ................................................................................ 7 3.4 Cultural and social values ................................................................................................. 10 3.5 Consumptive use ..............................................................................................................10 4 Allocation limit decision and licensing rules ........................................................... 12 4.1 Assessment of risks ..........................................................................................................12 4.1.1 Initial risk assessment ........................................................................................................... 12 4.2 Licensing rules and resource management ..................................................................... 13 4.3 Allocation limit and water availability ................................................................................ 14 4.3.1 Final risk assessment ........................................................................................................... 14 4.3.2 Using a risk matrix to determine yield ................................................................................... 14 4.3.3 Allocation limit and water availability ..................................................................................... 15 4.4 Monitoring and reporting ...................................................................................................15 4.5 Review of allocation limits ................................................................................................16 Appendix.................................................................................................................... 17 Glossary .................................................................................................................... 18 References and further reading ................................................................................. 22 Appendix River pools in the lower Turner groundwater resource area ...................................................... 17 Figures Figure 1 Resource boundary of the lower Turner alluvial aquifer .............................. 4 Figure 2 Pools along the lower Turner River that are possibly groundwater- dependent ecosystems and their permanency ........................................... 9 Department of Water iii Water resource allocation and planning, no. 50 Lower Turner groundwater allocation limit report Tables Table 1 Characteristics of interest of the lower Turner alluvium .............................. 5 Table 2 Estimated stock and domestic water use, which is exempt from licensing10 Table 3 Determining the risk of abstraction on in situ values and the risk of limiting water available for consumptive use ......................................................... 12 Table 4 Licensing and management rules for the lower Turner alluvial aquifer ..... 14 Table 5 Risk matrix for determining the proportion of yield for allocation............... 15 Table 6 Allocation limit and components for the lower Turner alluvial aquifer ....... 15 Table 7 Details of location and permanency of pools in the lower Turner Alluvial aquifer. ...................................................................................................... 17 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv Department of Water Lower Turner groundwater allocation limit report Water resource allocation and planning, no. 50 Summary Demand for groundwater in the lower Turner River area is increasing due to extra water requirements for mining and related industry. To support any development in the area and provide guidance to proponents, the Department of Water (DoW) has set an allocation limit and the licensing rules for the lower Turner alluvial aquifer, which are set out in this report. To determine the lower Turner alluvial aquifer allocation limit, the department has used a risk-based approach (DoW 2010). We use this approach in areas where knowledge about the groundwater resource is limited and competing demands for the water do not exist. This allows us to develop allocation limits and licensing rules quickly and consistently. This approach has four steps: 1 Identify and define the groundwater resource. 2 Describe aquifer properties, groundwater-dependent values and consumptive uses and assess the risks. 3 Assess whether any risks can be managed through licensing rules. 4 Set allocation limits and licensing rules. Using the process outlined above, the department has set an allocation limit for the lower Turner alluvial aquifer of 0.42 GL/yr. As at January 2011, water is still available for licensing. As there is only limited information about this water resource, the department welcomes new investigations and data which would improve our understanding of the aquifer. If new information shows that more water is available than the estimate that has been used in this report, and that the effects of increased abstraction are manageable, then we may review the allocation limit. Department of Water v Lower Turner groundwater allocation limit report Water resource allocation and planning, no. 50 1 Introduction The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • We Are Seeking Preliminary Input to Help Shape
    Shaping Hedland’s Future OVERVIEW OF KEY ISSUES LEGEND Town of Port Hedland Redout Island Local Government Boundary We are seeking preliminary input to Town of Port Hedland Town Planning Scheme No. 5 Boundary help shape Hedland’s Local Planning Local Government Boundary Strategy which will guide land use Key Roads What are the economic planning and development for the next Rivers opportunities for the Pastoral Lease / Station Boundary 10 to 20 years. pastoral industry?North Turtle Island Indigenous Reserve Your input into the preparation of Indigenous Campsite the Local Planning Strategy will Information Turtle Island Information seek to build on the comprehensive Ripon Island Information De Grey engagement previously undertaken Information Ridley River by the Town which informed the Information asdasd Port Hedland Information De Grey River preparation of the Town’s Strategic NORT asdasd Tjalka Boorda T HERN HIG Y Pardoo GREA HWA Information Marta Marta Community Plan, under the headings asdasd Punju Njamal Information De Grey asdasd of community, economy, built and Tjalka Wara Jinparinya Information asdasd Strelley Shaw River natural environment. Information Pippingara asdasd South West Creek Shelley River Information asdasd Burrup Information Boodarie Point Samson asdasd Peawah River Information Cossack asdasd M How can we plan for a more integrated Balla Balla Mundabullangana ARB Karratha Information Turner River LE BAR asdasd Wallareenya RO community? Poverty Yule River Roebourne Information A Whim Creek Creek D asdasd ST COAS TAL
    [Show full text]
  • A11 Mesa J Project Aquatic Ecosystems Pools Study
    MESA ‘J PROJECT AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM STUDY SEPTEMBER 2015 i 1 ’ River Pool Ecosystem Study April 2017 Report ST5/2017 Streamtec Pty Ltd 2 © Streamtec Pty Ltd TITLE Mesa ‘J’ Project Aquatic Ecosystem Pools Study PRODUCED FOR Rio Tinto Pty Ltd ACN 008 694 246 P.O. Box 21, WICKHAM, Western Australia, 6720. DATE July 2017. PUBLICATION DATA Streamtec (2017). Mesa J Project Aquatic Ecosystems Study April 2017. Unpublished Report to Rio Tinto Pty Ltd. Streamtec Pty Ltd. Report ST5/2017 July 2017. COVER PHOTOGRAPHS Front Cover: Pirathalu (photo Ian Craig). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was commissioned by Rio Tinto Pty Ltd and we are grateful of support of Russell Thomas and Patrick Distel. We acknowledge Department of Water, the Bureau of Meteorology and the Chemistry Centre of WA. DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of the Client, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreement between the client and Streamtec Pty Ltd. Streamtec Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for it in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. In particular, it should be noted that this report is a professional assessment and opinion only, based on the scope of the services defined by the Client, budgetary and time constraints imposed by the Client, the information supplied by the Client (and its agents), and the method consistent with the preceding. Streamtec Pty Ltd could not attempt to verify the accuracy or completeness of all information supplied. Copying of this report or parts of this report is not permitted without explicit authorisation of the Client and Streamtec Pty Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • East Kimberley Impact Assessment Project
    East Kimberley Impact Assessment Project HISTORICAL NOTES RELEVANT TO IMPACT STORIES OF THE EAST KIMBERLEY Cathie Clement* East Kimberley Working Paper No. 29 ISBN O 86740 357 8 ISSN 0816...,6323 A Joint Project Of The: Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies Australian National University Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies Anthropology Department University of Western Australia Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia The aims of the project are as follows: 1. To compile a comprehensive profile of the contemporary social environment of the East Kimberley region utilising both existing information sources and limited fieldwork. 2. Develop and utilise appropriate methodological approaches to social impact assessment within a multi-disciplinary framework. 3. Assess the social impact of major public and private developments of the East Kimberley region's resources (physical, mineral and environmental) on resident Aboriginal communities. Attempt to identify problems/issues which, while possibly dormant at present, are likely to have implications that will affect communities at some stage in the future. 4. Establish a framework to allow the dissemination of research results to Aboriginal communities so as to enable them to develop their own strategies for dealing with social impact issues. 5. To identify in consultation with Governments and regional interests issues and problems which may be susceptible to further research. Views expressed in the Projecfs publications are the views of the authors, and are not necessarily shared by the sponsoring organisations. Address correspondence to: The Executive Officer East Kimberley Project CRES, ANU GPO Box4 Canberra City, ACT 2601 HISTORICAL NOTES RELEVANT TO IMPACT STORIES OF THE EAST KIMBERLEY Cathie Clement* East Kimberley Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Resource Assessment and Conceptualization in the Pilbara Region, Western Australia
    Earth Systems and Environment https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-018-0051-0 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Groundwater Resource Assessment and Conceptualization in the Pilbara Region, Western Australia Rodrigo Rojas1 · Philip Commander2 · Don McFarlane3,4 · Riasat Ali5 · Warrick Dawes3 · Olga Barron3 · Geof Hodgson3 · Steve Charles3 Received: 25 January 2018 / Accepted: 8 May 2018 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract The Pilbara region is one of the most important mining hubs in Australia. It is also a region characterised by an extreme climate, featuring environmental assets of national signifcance, and considered a valued land by indigenous people. Given the arid conditions, surface water is scarce, shows large variability, and is an unreliable source of water for drinking and industrial/mining purposes. In such conditions, groundwater has become a strategic resource in the Pilbara region. To date, however, an integrated regional characterization and conceptualization of the occurrence of groundwater resources in this region were missing. This article addresses this gap by integrating disperse knowledge, collating available data on aquifer properties, by reviewing groundwater systems (aquifer types) present in the region and identifying their potential, and propos- ing conceptualizations for the occurrence and functioning of the groundwater systems identifed. Results show that aquifers across the Pilbara Region vary substantially and can be classifed in seven main types: coastal alluvial systems, concealed channel
    [Show full text]
  • [Tabled Doc] Attachment a (B) ABORIGINAL LANDS TRUST
    LA QON 2989 [Tabled Doc] Attachment A (b) ABORIGINAL LANDS TRUST (ALT) - NAME AND LOCATION LAND NAME LAND LOCATION 1 10 MILE FLAT GREAT NORTHERN HIGHWAY, 13 KM SE FROM WYNDHAM 2 58 HAMPTON STREET, ROEBOURNE LOT 500, H58, HAMPTON STREET, ROEBOURNE 6718 3 ADMIRALTY GULF APPROX 340 KM NE OF DERBY 4 AIRPORT RESERVE 34 DJAIGWEEN ROAD, DJUGUN (BROOME) 6725 5 ALBANY 14 MAXWELL STREET, MOUNT MELVILLE 6330 6 APPLECROSS 62 MATHESON ROAD, APPLECROSS 6153 7 AXLE GREASE LOT 15832 PINJARRA-WILLIAMS ROAD, WILLIAMS 6391 8 BACHSTEN CREEK IN PRINCE REGENT NATURE RESERVE, 230 KM NE OF DERBY 9 BADJALING 31 BADJALING-YOTING ROAD, BADJALING 6383 10 BALGO BALGO NR LAKE GREGORY 11 BAYULU EX GO GO GREAT NORTHERN HIGHWAY, VIA FITZROY CROSSING 12 BEAGLE BAY DAMPIER PENINSULA 13 BEAGLE BAY DAMPIER PENINSULA 14 BEAGLE BAY DAMPIER PENINSULA VIA BROOME 15 BEAGLE BAY CAPE LEVEQUE ROAD, VIA BROOME 16 BEAGLE BAY IN BEAGLE BAY COMMUNITY, DAMPIER PENINSULA 17 BEAGLE BAY L 375 BEAGLE BAY RD, DAMPIER PENINSULA 6725 18 BEAGLE BAY DAMPIER PENINSULA NORTH OF BROOME 19 BEAGLE BAY CARNOT BAY SW OF BEAGLE BAY, DAMPIER PENINSULA 20 BEAGLE BAY LOC 402 BEAGLE BAY COMMUNITY, DAMPIER PENINSULA 21 BEVERLEY 314 GREAT SOUTHERN HIGHWAY, BEVERLEY 6304 22 BIDYADANGA LA GRANGE MISSION, 180 KM SW FROM BROOME 23 BIDYADANGA AKA LA GRANGE 180 KM SW FROM BROOME 1 24 BILLILUNA SOUTH OF TANAMI ROAD 25 BLUE HILLS LITTLE SANDY DESERT, 150 KM NNE OF WILUNA 26 BLYTHE CREEK NEAR CHARNLEY RIVER, VIA DERBY 27 BOBIEDING DAMPIER PENINSULA NORTH OF BROOME 28 BONDINI WONGAWOL ROAD APPROX 5KM EAST OF WILUNA 29
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Seeking Preliminary Input to Help Shape Hedland's Local
    Shaping Hedland’s Future OVERVIEW OF KEY ISSUES LEGEND Town of Port Hedland Redout Island Local Government Boundary We are seeking preliminary input to Town of Port Hedland Town Planning Scheme No. 5 Boundary help shape Hedland’s Local Planning Local Government Boundary Strategy which will guide land use Key Roads What are the economic planning and development for the next Rivers opportunities for the Pastoral Lease / Station Boundary 10 to 20 years. pastoral industry?North Turtle Island Indigenous Reserve Your input into the preparation of Indigenous Campsite the Local Planning Strategy will Turtle Island seek to build on the comprehensive Ripon Island engagement previously undertaken De Grey Ridley River by the Town which informed the Port Hedland De Grey River preparation of the Town’s Strategic NORT Tjalka Boorda T HERN HIG Y Pardoo GREA HWA Marta Marta Community Plan, under the headings Punju Njamal De Grey of community, economy, built and Tjalka Wara Jinparinya Strelley natural environment. Shaw River South West Pippingara Creek Shelley River Boodarie Peawah River M How can we plan for a more integrated Balla Balla Mundabullangana ARB Turner River LE BAR Wallareenya RO community? Poverty Yule River A Whim Creek Creek D ST COAS TAL WE H Shaw River H IGHWA T Y R Town of O N Port Hedland Lalla Rookh Marble Bar What community infrastructure & services City of Indee Karratha would support growth? North Pole Community Considerations Peawah River Kangan • High quality health and education services essential to Shire of retain population
    [Show full text]
  • Yule River Water Reserve Water Source Protection Plan Port Hedland
    Important information The Yule River Water Reserve water source protection plan (2000) has been reviewed. Please ensure you read the Yule drinking water source protection review (2019, WRP no.141) alongside this 2000 plan to obtain all of the information about this drinking water source. The 2019 review considers changes that have occurred in and around the Yule River Water Reserve since the completion of the 2000 plan. Additional recommendations have been prepared to ensure the ongoing protection of this public drinking water source area: amending the boundary under the Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947 (WA) to reflect more recent groundwater modelling information. You can find the 2019 Yule River Water Reserve drinking water source protection review at www.dwer.wa.gov.au or by contacting the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation on +61 8 6364 7000 or [email protected]. YULE RIVER WATER RESERVE WATER SOURCE PROTECTION PLAN Port Hedland Regional Water Supply WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION SERIES WATER AND RIVERS COMMISSION REPORT WRP 30 2000 WATER AND RIVERS COMMISSION HYATT CENTRE 3 PLAIN STREET EAST PERTH WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6004 TELEPHONE (08) 9278 0300 FACSIMILE (08) 9278 0301 WEBSITE: http://www.wrc.wa.gov.au We welcome your feedback A publication feedback form can be found at the back of this publication, or online at http://www.wrc.wa.gov.au/public/feedback/ (Cover Photograph: Cattle grazing on Mundabullanga pastoral lease) YULE RIVER WATER RESERVE WATER SOURCE PROTECTION PLAN Port Hedland Regional Water Supply
    [Show full text]
  • Original Distribution of Trichosurus Vulpecula (Marsupialia: Phalangeridae) in Western Australia, with Particular Reference to Occurrence Outside the Southwest
    Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 95: 83–93, 2012 Original distribution of Trichosurus vulpecula (Marsupialia: Phalangeridae) in Western Australia, with particular reference to occurrence outside the southwest I ABBOTT Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, WA 6983, Australia. ! [email protected] Trichosurus vulpecula, ‘common brushtail possum’, is currently considered to have never occurred in ~20% of Western Australia. This paper reports the results of a survey of historical sources, showing that the species was widely known to Aborigines and was once more broadly distributed, and may have occurred across almost all of Western Australia in 1829, the year of first settlement by Europeans. A remarkable contraction in geographical range commenced ca 1880, caused by an epizootic, and continued from ca 1920–1960 as a result of depredation by foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Some 220 Aboriginal names from outside the southwest were discovered. These are tabulated, and most can be reduced to seven regional names. Several or all of these names appear suitable for adoption into regional use in Western Australia. The current vernacular name is now inaccurate (the species is no longer common anywhere in Western Australia and is not closely related to the Virginia opossum, Didelphys virginiana, which belongs to a different family of marsupials), and should be replaced by one or more Aboriginal names. KEYWORDS: Aboriginal names, biogeography, brushtail possum, ecological history, mammal, regional extinction, Trichosurus vulpecula INTRODUCTION 1. Specimens held in the collection of the Western Australian Museum (Kitchener & Vicker 1981) Trichosurus vulpecula, known as the ‘common brushtail possum’ (Kerle & How 2008), until recent times occurred 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Turner River
    ASX Announcement 9 February 2017 Acquisition of Indee Gold provides scale and development momentum De Grey secures exclusive and binding 12 month option to evaluate and explore with right to acquire the adjoining and ASX Code DEG highly prospective Indee Gold Project within 18 months. ABN 65 094 206 292 Acquisition to fast track and bolster De Grey’s stated corporate objective - Near-term development and gold production at Turner River. COMPANY DIRECTORS Key assets of Indee Gold: Simon Lill Executive Chairman Resources (JORC 2004) with 77% Indicated category or better. Davide Bosio Additional positive drilling results beneath current resources. Non-executive Director Advanced walk-up drill targets provide resource upside. Secures additional 60km strike of Mallina Shear Zone. Steve Morris Non-executive Director Granted mining leases to reduce development timeframe. Exposed gold mineralisation in five shallow open pits. Craig Nelmes Company Secretary/CFO 850,000t of crushed mineralised material in surface stockpile. Mine infrastructure including camp, ROM pad and haul roads. CONTACT DETAILS Immediate Focus – Priority Programmes Principal & Registered Office March 2017 Quarter Level 2, Suite 9 Upgrade of Indee Gold resources to JORC Code (2012). 389 Oxford Street Mt Hawthorn WA 6016 Stage 1 Open Pit Mining Scoping Study . Simple open pit mining PO Box 281 . Dominantly oxide gold resources Mt Hawthorn WA 6016 . Centralised CIL plant at Indee. www.degreymining.com.au . Determine scale of operation [email protected] June 2017 Quarter Resource drilling at Mallina and Mt Berghaus prospects. T +61 8 9381 4108 Commence detailed feasibility studies F +61 8 9381 6761 Executive Chairman, Simon Lill, commented: “This acquisition not only consolidates ownership of the regionally significant and highly prospective Mallina Shear Zone, but dovetails very well with our Turner River Project and fast tracks De Grey into development studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Agency Statement of Natural Resource Management Priorities in Western Australia
    Preliminary Agency Statement of Natural Resource Management Priorities in Western Australia Department of Agriculture Department of Conservation and Land Management Department of Environment Department of Fisheries November 2003 “Results contained within this report do not represent a final priority listing of assets for investment, but provide a starting point or guide for further discussion and investigations that will contribute to a final investment decision.” Acknowledgments Contribution Personnel Title Organisation Team Leader Verity Klemm Restoration and Management Department of Environment Section Manager Report Preparation Eve Bunbury Manager, Marine Planning Department of Fisheries Report Preparation Keith Claymore Senior Policy Advisor Department of Conservation and Land Management Report Preparation Verity Klemm Restoration and Management Department of Environment Section Manager Report Preparation Damien McAlinden Natural Resource Management Department of Environment Officer Report Preparation Brendan Nicholas Research Officer, Esperance Department of Agriculture Office Report Preparation Noel Schoknecht Unit Manager for Natural Department of Agriculture Resources Report Preparation Rob Tregonning Senior Policy Officer, Department of Fisheries Environmental Assessment Report Preparation Ian Watson Advisor, Land Management Department of Agriculture Report Preparation Gordon Wyre Acting Director, Nature Department of Conservation and Conservation Land Management For more information contact: Verity Klemm Catchment Management
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Environment
    Water and Environment STRATEGIC REVIEW OF THE SURFACE WATER MONITORING NETWORK REPORT Prepared for Department of Water Date of Issue 3 August 2009 Our Reference 1045/B1/005e STRATEGIC REVIEW OF THE SURFACE WATER MONITORING NETWORK REPORT Prepared for Department of Water Date of Issue 3 August 2009 Our Reference 1045/B1/005e STRATEGIC REVIEW OF THE SURFACE WATER MONITORING NETWORK REPORT Date Revision Description Revision A 28 April 2009 Draft Report for client review Revision B 05 June 2009 Amendments following client review Revision C 19 June 2009 Further amendments following client review Revision D 30 July 2009 Final inclusion of figures and formatting Revision E 3 August 2009 Final for release to client Name Position Signature Date Originator Glen Terlick Senior Hydrographer, 30/07/09 Department of Water Emma Neale Environmental 30/07/09 Consultant Reviewer Vince Piper Principal Civil/ Water 30/07/09 Resources Engineer Leith Bowyer Senior Hydrologist, 30/07/09 Department of Water Location Address Issuing Office Perth Suite 4, 125 Melville Parade, Como WA 6152 Tel: 08 9368 4044 Fax: 08 9368 4055 Our Reference 1045/B1/005e STRATEGIC REVIEW OF THE SURFACE WATER MONITORING NETWORK REPORT CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................1 1.2 State Water Strategy......................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 October
    October 2018 TURNER RIVER BRIDGE SAND PROJECT WORKS APPROVAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT Version: 1.0 PILBARA, WA KEY CONTACTS Bob Holmes Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd Phone: (08) 9311 8811 Email: [email protected] Ms Sharon Arena Principal Environmental Advisor Animal Plant Mineral Pty. Ltd. Phone: 0419 934 461 Email: [email protected] Turner River Bridge Sand Project: Prepared on behalf of Mining Lease M45/1193 Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd by: Prescribed Premise: Mining Lease M45/1193 Animal Plant Mineral Pty Ltd WORKS APPROVAL SUPPORTING DOCUMENT – TURNER RIVER BRIDGE SAND PROJECT V.1 Completed by: Animal Plant Mineral Pty Ltd ABN: 86 886 455 949 Tel: (08) 6296 5155 Fax: (08) 6296 5199 Address : 47 Caroline Retreat Henley Brook, Western Australia 6055 Website: www.animalplantmineral.com.au For further information on this report please contact: Ms Sharon Arena Tel: 0419 934 461 Email: [email protected] Disclaimer This document is protected by legal professional privilege. To ensure privilege is not waived, please keep this document confidential and in a safe and secure place. This document should not be distributed to, nor any reference to it made to any person or organization not directly involved in making decisions upon the subject matter of this document. If this document is requested by a third party, legal advice should be immediately obtained prior to that person viewing or taking the document to ensure that any necessary disclosure occurs in an appropriate manner. HANSON CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PTY LTD Page | i WORKS APPROVAL SUPPORTING DOCUMENT – TURNER RIVER BRIDGE SAND PROJECT V.1 CONTENTS PROJECT TERMS .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]