DOCSLIB.ORG

Maciej Górny Tadeusz Manteuffel Institute of History, Polish Academy of Sciences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maciej Górny Tadeusz Manteuffel Institute of History, Polish Academy of Sciences Acta Poloniae Historica 123, 2021 PL ISSN 0001–6829 Maciej Górny https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8594-1365 Tadeusz Manteuffel Institute of History, Polish Academy of Sciences BLACK MIRROR: A COMPARATIVE HISTORY OF POLISH AND AMERICAN FAILURES Abstract Even though they occurred around the same time, the Polish January Uprising of 1863/64 and the American Civil War (1861–5) have seldom been considered in the same context by historians, while comparative historical studies of the events are scarce. The present article explores the historiography relating to both countries to, fi rstly, outline the most interesting attempts in existing Polish and US-American research to fi nd shared aspects in the two events. Secondly, my study establishes and analyses phenomena and themes in these parallel histories that could prove most fruitful for comparative investigation. In conclusion, I assess the potential that comparative approaches could generate for the historiography of the American Civil War and the January Uprising. Keywords: January Uprising, Poland, American Civil War, memory, gender ste- reotypes, nationalism, guerrilla warfare I One of the most renowned historians of the American Civil War, James M. McPherson, sought to illustrate the signifi cance of this confl ict for the history of the USA by referring to an experience from the 1970s. He met a delegation of Soviet historians who had come to mark the bicentenary of the War of Independence. McPherson was stunned that they had no interest in visiting places connected to the American Revolution. Instead, they wanted to visit the site of the Battle of Gettysburg. Why was this so? Because, as they told their hosts, Gettysburg was the US-American Stalingrad and the Civil War the equivalent of the Great Patriotic War.1 1 James M. McPherson, Drawn with the Sword (New York–Oxford, 1996), VII. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/APH.2021.123.05 118 Maciej Górny This anecdote helped McPherson stress the exceptional signifi cance of the American Civil War for both historiography and the social and political life of the contemporary United States.2 At the time of writing, the USA is experiencing a wave of iconoclasm, with statues and other memorials to the generals of the Confederate Army being torn down. However, it would be a mistake to believe that this is the fi nal chapter of a history that has lasted some 160 years. There is another aspect to the anecdote with the Soviet delega- tion that McPherson seems to have overlooked. However, this less conspicuous aspect contains great potential for exploring the American Civil War in the context of comparative and entangled history (histoire croisée). This potential has gone largely untapped, not only in the works of the renowned historian McPherson but also more generally in historical research. Existing attempts to adopt such approaches beyond the narrow framework of military history have concentrated on two particular spheres of interest. The fi rst has involved investigating the emancipation of Black Americans in the context of the emancipation of peasants and serfs in various regions of Europe, most commonly through a Marxist-inspired lens.3 The second, which has yielded a much 2 See id., ‘A War That Never Goes Away’, American Heritage, 41 (1990), 41–9; Gary W. Gallagher, The Confederate War (Cambridge, MA–London, 1997), 28–30, and many others. 3 The most dedicated adherent of this approach is Enrico Dal Lago, author of over a dozen studies exploring social problems in the nineteenth-century USA and southern Italy. Works include Enrico Dal Lago, ‘“States of Rebellion”: Civil War, Rural Unrest, and the Agrarian Question in the American South and the Italian Mezzogiorno, 1861–1865’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, xlvii, 2 (2005), 403–32; id., Agrarian Elites: American Slaveholders and Southern Italian Landowners, 1815–1861 (Baton Rouge LA, 2005). Dal Lago also contributed to the edited volume, Jörg Nagler, Don H. Doyle, and Marcus Gräser (eds), The Transnational Signifi cance of the American Civil War (Basingstoke, 2016). See also Shearer Davis Bowman, Masters and Lords: Mid-19th-Century U.S. Planters and Prussian Junkers (New York–Oxford, 1993); id., ‘Honor and Martialism in the U.S. South and Prussian East Elbia during the Mid-Nineteenth Century’, in Kees Gispen (ed.), What Made the South Different? (Jackson, MS–London, 1989), 19–40; Richard Graham, ‘Economics or Culture? The Development of the U.S. South and Brazil in the Days of Slavery’, in ibid., 97–124; Peter Kolchin, Unfree Labor: American Slavery and Russian Serfdom (Cambridge MA, 1987). A comparative approach to slavery, including the USA, was developed in Polish historiography by Iza Bieżuńska-Małowist and Marian Małowist, Niewolnictwo (Warszawa, 1987). Their work resulted from a research fellowship that enabled them to visit the United States. Comparative History of Polish and American Failures 119 more modest number of works, has focused on the commemoration of the war, particularly the psychological impact of the South’s defeat.4 My article outlines areas of interest that could prove fruitful for developing a comparative history of the American Civil War. To avoid falling into the temptation of more or less arbitrary comparisons, I locate my investigations in a particular time and place, namely: the period of the January Uprising in Congress Poland (the Russian- -controlled Kingdom of Poland). I am aware that by focusing on the par- ticular aspects of the two histories – of the Uprising and the American Civil War – outlined below, I omit a great number of others that do not contain the signifi cant potential for comparative approaches (or I have not been capable of perceiving their potential in this respect). II PARALLEL HISTORIES In February 1861, Warsaw witnessed demonstrations by Polish patriots. During one such event, Russian forces opened fi re, killing fi ve people. Anger at the brutality of the military gave rise to a long-term protest movement that involved a signifi cant portion of elites – Catholic, Jewish and Protestant alike – in Russian-controlled Poland. There was a notable escalation of the confl ict in April 1861, when Russian bullets killed perhaps even several hundred people (the exact number is unknown). The repressive measures did not calm the situation; in fact, they had the opposite effect. Society opposed further restrictions, such as curfews, bans on wearing mourning-dress in commemoration of victims and any other ostensibly Polish clothing, and forbidding the singing of patriotic hymns in churches. The pressure exerted on people who did not close shops despite fl yers stating that they should be closed, who refused to make donations ‘for the national cause’ or who instead eagerly illuminated their displays during offi cial celebrations of the Russian ruling court, amounted to low-level terrorisation that primarily involved smashing windows and caterwauling (Warsaw even had its own ‘caterwaul bandmaster’ and a price list: 10 roubles 4 A standard work that nevertheless has faced criticism from academic historians for its mistakes and tendency towards over-simplifi cation is the popular study by Wolfgang Schievelbusch, Die Kultur der Niederlage. Der amerikanische Süden 1865, Frankreich 1871, Deutschland 1918 (Berlin, 2001). 120 Maciej Górny for services rendered without smashing windows, 15 roubles including the smashing of windows). People adjudged to have collaborated with the [Russian] police were often beaten up, to the extent that they lost some teeth, and some were threatened with having an ear cut off.5 Even as the Russian authorities made large-scale arrests in the following months, the Polish protest movement transformed into an organised conspiracy. Legal channels of communication with the outside world were closed down, while from autumn 1862, the private press was forbidden from writing on political themes or publishing foreign correspondence.6 The situation became explosive in January of the following year. Military conscription, organised in such a way as to include ‘suspicious elements’, including urban youths, led to the outbreak of an uprising that lasted nearly two years and bore all the hallmarks of a civil war.7 Around the same time across the Atlantic, Abraham Lincoln’s victory in the US presidential election of 1860 provoked a political crisis that resembled the situation that was developing around the same time in Warsaw. In early 1861, in response to Lincoln’s election (or rather, in response to its potential repercussions), South Carolina became the fi rst of several southern US states to secede from the Union. The fi rst shots in what developed into the American Civil War were fi red four days after the bloody demonstration of 8 April 1861 in Warsaw. On 1 January 1863, President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which granted freedom to Black slaves in the rebel states. Several weeks later, the insurgent Central National Committee [Komitet Centralny Narodowy] presented its manifesto in Warsaw. It granted all citizens of a free Poland equal status, regardless of their origins, while peasants who had already been emancipated were promised land, thus closing a loophole in Russian legislation. The emancipation of serfs in Russia was proclaimed in 1861, though it did not cover the Kingdom of Poland. 5 Barbara Petrozolin, Przed tą nocą (Warszawa, 1997), 250–1. Cf. Małgorzata Sikorska, ‘Represje władz carskich wobec warszawiaków w latach 1861–1862 (czyli o modzie i biżuterii w okresie “żałoby narodowej”)’, in Małgorzata Sikorska (ed.), Zgniotą nas tyrany – powstaniem na nowo! Wokół powstania styczniowego 1861–1863 (Warszawa, 2013), 25–41. 6 Ibid., 414. 7 Stefan Kieniewicz, Powstanie styczniowe (Warszawa, 1983), 555. Comparative History of Polish and American Failures 121 The parallel histories of the American Civil War and the January Uprising in the Russian partition of Poland diverged for several months in early 1864. Although the balance tipped in favour of the North during this period, the confl ict still lasted for another year.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Emigre—Historian
    ORGANON 32:2003 Piotr Wandycz (Yale, U. S. A.) AN EMIGRE — HISTORIAN How and where does one commence a scholarly autobiography? Perhaps the best precept is to be found in Alice in Wonderland: Begin at the beginning, the King said, and go on till you come to the end: then stop. Thinking of the beginnings my thoughts go back to my family, an intelligentsia Polish family with broad intellectual interests. My mother wrote children’s books, her sister (Mieroszewska) was a painter, and so was my brother, my sister had a Ph. D. in art history from the Jagiellonian University. To avoid possible confusion I should add that they were my half-brother and half-sister and their family name was Mars. However, being extremely close to one another we never used the term half. My brother’s influence during my formative years was particularly strong. My father was by education a chemist and he became a leading figure in the Polish oil industry. But by inclination he remained a humanist with a deep knowledge of music and literature. The tradition of Young Poland weighed heavily on my parents and to some extent was passed on to me. So was an attachment to the past - perhaps a romanticized vision of it. Ideologically, my parents were adherents of Piłsudski - my father was a legionary of the First Brigade - and I remember them crying at the news of the Marshal’s death. My uncle (father’s brother) was in POW. In the late 1930s, however, when the sanacja split internally and began to move to the right, my parents became critical of the regime and looked up to general Kazimierz Sosnkowski and the nascent Democratic Clubs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Siberian Polonia in the Second Half of the 19Th – Early 20Th Century in the Polish Historiography
    PRZEGLĄD WSCHODNIOEUROPEJSKI VIII/1 2017: 11–21 Vladimir Shaidurov Saint-Petersburg Mining University THE SIBERIAN POLONIA IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 19TH – EARLY 20TH CENTURY IN THE POLISH HISTORIOGRAPHY Keywords: Russia, Poland, Siberia, Polish community, historiography, martyrological approach, civilizational approach, political exile Abstract: The period between the 19th – early 20th century witnessed waves of actively forming Polish communities in Russia’s rural areas. A major factor that contributed to the process was the repressive policy by the Russian Empire towards those involved in the Polish national liberation and revolutionary movement. Large communities were founded in Siberia, the Volga region, Caucasus, and European North of Russia (Arkhangelsk). One of the largest communities emerged in Siberia. By the early 20th century, the Polonia in the region consisted of tens of thousands of people. The Polish population was engaged in Siberia’s economic life and was an important stakeholder in business. Among the most well-known Polish-Siberian entrepreneurs was Alfons Poklewski-Koziell who was called the “Vodka King of Siberia” by his contemporaries. Poles, who returned from Siberian exile and penal labor, left recollections of their staying in Siberia or notes on the region starting already from the middle of the 19th century. It was this literature that was the main source of information about the life of the Siberian full for a long time. Exile undoubtedly became a significant factor that was responsible for Russia’s negative image in the historical memory of Poles. This was reflected in publications based on the martyrological approach in the Polish historiography. Glorification of the struggle of Poles to restore their statehood was a central standpoint adopted not only in memoirs, but also in scientific studies that appeared the second half of the 19th – early 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Acta 123.Indd
    Acta Poloniae Historica 123, 2021 PL ISSN 0001–6829 Mariusz Wołos https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6943-1069 Tadeusz Manteuffel Institute of History, Polish Academy of Sciences Institute of History and Archival Research, Pedagogical University in Cracow “AN UNFULFILLED WRITER WHO BECAME A HISTORIAN”*. JERZY WOJCIECH BOREJSZA (22 AUGUST 1935 – 28 JULY 2019)** Abstract 12 Jerzy Wojciech Borejsza was the son of communist activist Jerzy Borejsza, referred to as an ‘international communist’, and Ewa née Kantor. His grandfather Abraham Goldberg was one of the leaders of Polish Zionists. Borejsza described himself as ‘a Pole of Jewish origin’. His personality was greatly infl uenced by the Second World War experiences, including the pogrom of Jews in German-occupied Lwów in July 1941 and the tragic events of occupied Warsaw. As a result of the deci- sion of the communist party authorities, in 1952, Borejsza was sent to study in the Soviet Union, fi rst to Kazan, then to Moscow. This made it impossible for him to study Polish philology in Warsaw; Borejsza, therefore, chose historical studies. After returning to Poland in 1957, he undertook research on the history of Polish emigration after the January Uprising (1863–4). He was also interested in the history of the Polish socialist movement and its connections to socialism in Western Europe. Later, Borejsza intervened in the historiography of the Crimean War (1853–6), intending to bring this forgotten armed confl ict back to light. He coined the phrase ‘the beautiful nineteenth century’, in contrast to the twentieth century as a time of hatred, extermination, and the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Essay
    Studia Judaica (2017), Special English Issue, pp. 117–130 doi:10.4467/24500100STJ.16.020.7372 REVIEW ESSAY Piotr J. Wróbel Modern Syntheses of Jewish History in Poland: A Review* After World War II, Poland became an ethnically homogeneous state. National minorities remained beyond the newly-moved eastern border, and were largely exterminated, forcefully removed, or relocated and scattered throughout the so-called Recovered Territories (Polish: Ziemie Odzys­ kane). The new authorities installed in Poland took care to ensure that the memory of such minorities also disappeared. The Jews were no exception. Nearly two generations of young Poles knew nothing about them, and elder Poles generally avoided the topic. But the situation changed with the disintegration of the authoritarian system of government in Poland, as the intellectual and informational void created by censorship and political pressure quickly filled up. Starting from the mid-1980s, more and more Poles became interested in the history of Jews, and the number of publica- tions on the subject increased dramatically. Alongside the US and Israel, Poland is one of the most important places for research on Jewish history. * Polish edition: Piotr J. Wróbel, “Współczesne syntezy dziejów Żydów w Polsce. Próba przeglądu,” Studia Judaica 19 (2016), 2: 317–330. The special edition of the journal Studia Judaica, containing the English translation of the best papers published in 2016, was financed from the sources of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education for promotion of scientific research, according to the agreement 508/P-DUN/2016. 118 PIOTR J. WRÓBEL Jewish Historiography during the Polish People’s Republic (PRL) Reaching the current state of Jewish historiography was neither a quick nor easy process.
    [Show full text]
  • Emanuel Halicz – More Than Scientist’S Profile
    Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej ■ LII-SI(1) Michał Kozłowski Lublin Emanuel Halicz – More than Scientist’s Profile Zarys treści: Sylwetka naukowa i polityczna Emanuela Halicza, historyka XIX w., współpracow- nika emigracyjnych „Zeszytów Historycznych”. Outline of content: Scientific and political profile of Emanuel Halicz, nineteenth-century historian, co-worker of emigrant Zeszyty Historyczne. Słowa kluczowe: polscy historycy, polscy Żydzi, oficerowie polityczni Wojska Polskiego, Instytut Kształcenia Kadr Naukowych, Wojskowa Akademia Polityczna, emigranci marcowi, „Zeszyty Historyczne”, powstanie styczniowe 1863 Keywords: Polish historians, Polish Jews, political officers of Polish Armed Forces, Institute of Scientific Staff Education, Political-Military Academy, March emigrants,Zeszyty Historyczne, January Uprising of 1863 Many historians left Poland after 1986. Among them were such scholars as Lucjan Dobroszycki (1925–1995), Bolesław Drukier (1913–2006), Dawid Fajnhauz (1920–2004), Łukasz Hirszowicz (1920–1993), Henryk Katz (1914–1998), Paweł Korzec (1919–2012), Karol Lapter (1912–2003), Józef Lewandowski (1923–2007) and Aleksander Litwin (1909–1984). In People’s Republic of Poland they were doomed to oblivion. As opposed to their colleagues, who elected not to return to Poland in 1945, their situation was completely different. Conditions they faced were so difficult that few of the historians found themselves in the then situation. They were not welcome by “the old steadfast emigration” due to their former commitment to communism. Recently, one of the last representatives of this group passed away – Emanuel Halicz, an outstanding researcher of the 19th century. The historian was born on 19 September 1921 in Lvov. He was named Emanuel Halpern; his parents’ names were Leon and Róża.
    [Show full text]
  • Marceli Handelsman a Note on Biography Marceli Handelsman Was Born in 1882, in a Polish Jewish Family. in 1900, He Graduated
    Marceli Handelsman A note on biography Marceli Handelsman was born in 1882, in a Polish Jewish family. In 1900, he graduated summa cum laude from the 5th Secondary School for Boys. Between 1900 and 1904 he studied at the Faculty of Law of the Imperial University of Warsaw and was awarded a golden medal for his master’s thesis. He most likely chose law for pragmatic reasons. Handelsman was keen on history already then, but law was supposed to guarantee him a profession and work that was extremely hard to find in the times of intensive Russification. Already while a law student, Handelsman attended lectures in History, which helped him pursue his interests. He gained the knowledge that he could not acquire at university by reading, inquisitiveness, and hard work. After graduation, he pursued his career in law at his uncle Marek Kuratow’s law firm. Ultimately, he chose scientific work in history. A month later, he left to study in Berlin, where he attended lectures in History, Literature, Philosophy and Social Anthropology. As revolutionary fighting in Poland was becoming increasingly fierce in 1905, Handelsman decided to return to his homeland to join in the anti-tsar efforts. During his visit to Poland he delivered lectures i.a. in General History. His stay in Poland did not last long. Persuaded by his friends, Handelsman returned to Berlin to continue his studies, yet by no means did he give up his political activity. Apart from lecturing, he educated the Polish workers in the Polish Socialist Party [PPS]. He was active in party publications and for a few months, he was the editor of Gazeta Chłopska [The Peasants’ Gazette].
    [Show full text]
  • The Polish Army in France: Immigrants in America, World War I Volunteers in France, Defenders of the Recreated State in Poland
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Dissertations Department of History 7-28-2006 The Polish Army in France: Immigrants in America, World War I Volunteers in France, Defenders of the Recreated State in Poland David Thomas Ruskoski Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Ruskoski, David Thomas, "The Polish Army in France: Immigrants in America, World War I Volunteers in France, Defenders of the Recreated State in Poland." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2006. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss/1 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE POLISH ARMY IN FRANCE: IMMIGRANTS IN AMERICA, WORLD WAR I VOLUNTEERS IN FRANCE, DEFENDERS OF THE RECREATED STATE IN POLAND by DAVID T. RUSKOSKI Under the Direction of Gerald H. Davis and Christine M. Skwiot ABSTRACT Independent Poland ceased to exist in 1795 and the various insurrections to restore the Polish state were thwarted by the Germans, Austro-Hungarians, and Russians. During the First World War, Polish statesmen called upon the thousands of Polish immigrants in the United States to join the Polish Army in France, a military force funded by the French government and organized by the Polish Falcons of America and Ignacy Paderewski, the world-famous Polish pianist. Over 20,000 men trained in Canada and fought in the final months of the war on the Western front.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo Korzeniowski's Poland and Muscovy
    APOLLO KORZENIOWSKI’S POLAND AND MUSCOVY Jerzy Zdrada The Jagiellonian University, Cracow Apollo Korzeniowski’s treatise entitled Poland and Muscovy has escaped the attention of scholars writing about the attitudes of Poles towards Russia in the post-partition era; to date only general summaries of the work have appeared in biographical notes on this “forgotten poet”. Presenting the essential idea of Korzeniowski’s “treatise-cum-memoir”, Czesław Miłosz rightly warns us against the rash tendency to ascribe nationalism to its author.1 In his turn, Roman Taborski, while granting the work “some documentary value”, defi nes it as “a sad testimony to a loss of perspicacity in this writer, who used to be so discerning in evaluating social phenomena”, adding that the treatise is “a historiosophic study which is imbued with extreme national chauvinism and continues the traditions of messianist ideology” by idealising Poland’s historical past and vilifying the Russian nation.2 In his pithy observation, Zdzisław Najder aptly emphasises the fact that “this embittered disquisition […] deals, in passionate tones, with Russo-Polish relations from the time of the fi rst partition” and with Russia’s place in Europe. Korzeniowski, Najder adds, shows Russia against the historical background of “a struggle between barbarism and civilization” as “a contemporary embodiment of Asiatic, Tartar, and Byzantine bar- barism”, thus accusing Western Europe of a “cowardly or naive attitude towards Russia”.3 However true these views may seem, they fail to do adequate justice to the con- tent, the character and the aim of Korzeniowski’s Poland and Muscovy. They do not take into account the connection between Apollo’s refl ections and the views, or rather 1 Czesław Miłosz.
    [Show full text]
  • Acta 121.Indd
    SHORT NOTES SHORT NOTES* Acta Poloniae Historica 121, 2020 PL ISSN 0001–6829 GENERAL WORKS1 Krzysztof Łęcki, Według Tukidydesa. Rozważania socjologa literatury o „Wojnie peloponeskiej” [According to Thucydides. Refl ections of a Sociologist of Literature on History of the Peloponnesian War], Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice, 2019, 332 pp., bibliog., English and French sum. Thucydides of Athens remains an inspiration for students of history, politics, literature, and philosophy all over the Western world. The present study is an attempt at interpretation of his famous History of the Peloponnesian War from the point of view of the sociology of literature. Its main merit is clearly its erudition: one can get the impression that the book is a guide to the comments and citations regarding Thucydides made by a variety of scholars, philosophers, and poets. It seems that the author gathered evidence suggesting all possible interpretations of his protagonist’s monumental work. The impres- sive variety of opinions and comments on all aspects of Thucydides’ heritage by other authors, representing a true mélange of disciplines and approaches, makes it diffi cult however to determine if the author himself promotes, or indeed offers, any particular interpretation of his own. Neither is it easy to grasp what makes his approach representative of the sociology of literature. Instead, an illuminating, even if chaotic, introduction (which encompasses one third of the book), is followed by a chronological overview of the most important, or simply interesting, moments in Thucydides’ narrative. This selection does not seem highly original, as it is dominated by issues typically associated with ‘the father of historiography’: democracy and leadership, social divisions and tensions, the nature of the rivalry and hatred between Sparta and Athens, and the reasons for continuation of the exhausting confl ict, as well as Thucydides’ moral and psychological judgments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Catholic Church in the History of the Polish Exiled Community in Great Britain
    The Roman Catholic Church in the History of the Polish Exiled Community in Great Britain jtiZEF GULA School of Slavonic and East European Studies University of London 1993 The Roman Catholic Church in the History of the Polish Exiled Community in Great Britain JOZEF GULA School of Slavonic and East European Studies University of London 1993 THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE HISTORY OF THE EXILED POLISH COMMUNITY IN GREAT BRITAIN Jozef Gula The Roman Catholic Church in the Hisiory of the Exiled Polish Community in Great Britain © School of Slavonic and East European Studies 1993 ISBN: 0 903425 30 0 Printed in Great Britain by Henry Ling Limited The Dorset Press Dorchester DTI 1HD DEDICATION to the Polish Catholic Mission in London on its approach to the one hundredth anniversary (1994) of its existence, in recognition of its work in times of peace and war and to the late Mgr W\adys\aw Staniszewski, its longest serving rector and a man of great faith. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2019 with funding from UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES) https://archive.org/details/SSEES0006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword vii Acknowledgements viii List of Maps ix Introduction xi CHAPTER ONE: Polish Exiles in Nineteenth-Century Britain 1 The Polish Catholic Mission in London (1894-1939) 15 The Problem of National Identity 36 CHAPTER TWO: In Pursuit of Freedom. Religious Life during Attempts to Form a Polish Army Abroad (1939-40) 47 CHAPTER THREE: The Polish Naval and Air Forces and the Build-up of the Polish Army in Great Britain 61 CHAPTER FOUR: The Formation of the Polish Army in the Soviet Union (1941-45) 75 CHAPTER FIVE: ‘En Route for Poland’: the Polish Forces in the Middle East, Africa and Italy (1942-45) 109 CHAPTER SIX: A Victorious Army Loses the War.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Murder and the Victory of Ethnic Nationalism in Interwar Poland
    POLITICAL MURDER AND THE VICTORY OF ETHNIC NATIONALISM IN INTERWAR POLAND by Paul Brykczynski A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the University of Michigan 2013 Doctoral Committee: Professor Brian Porter-Szűcs, Chair Professor Ronald G. Suny Professor Geneviéve Zubrzycki Professor Robert Blobaum, University of West Virginia DEDICATION In memory of my Grandfather, Andrzej Pieczyński, who never talked about patriotism but whose life bore witness to its most beautiful traditions and who, among many other things, taught me both to love the modern history of Poland and to think about it critically. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In a project such as this, there are innumerable people to thank. While I know that this list will never be comprehensive, I will nevertheless do my best to acknowledge at least some of those without whom this work would not have been possible. Most important, there will never be a way to adequately thank my wife and best friend, Andrea, for standing by me 150% through this long and often difficult journey. Working on a PhD certainly has its ups and downs and, without Andrea, I would not have made it through the latter. Her faith in my work and in the path I had chosen never wavered, even when mine occasionally did. With that kind of support, one can accomplish anything one set one’s mind to. An enormous thank you must go to my parents, Mikołaj and Ewa Brykczyński. Despite being uprooted from their culture by the travails of political emigration, they somehow found the strength to raise me with the traditions of the Central European Intelligentsia—that is to say in an environment where books were read, ideas were discussed, and intellectual curiosity was valued and encouraged.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Work As a Problem in Polish Historiography
    Title Organic Work as a Problem in Polish Historiography Author(s) Blejwas, Stanislaus A. Citation スラヴ研究, 19, 191-205 Issue Date 1974 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/5044 Type bulletin (article) File Information KJ00000112989.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP ORGANIC WORK AS A PROBLEM IN POLISH HISTORIOGRAPHY* Stanislaus A, BLEJWAS " The (I'olish) nation (in the nineteenth century)," according to the historian Michak Robrzyfiski, " pursued independence along two roads: through armed insur- rection and through organic work," paths which frequently intersected during a period which "witnessed the internal rebirth of the nation."l' Understandably Polish historiography has venerated the violent reaction to the loss of independence, the armed insurrections against the partitioning powers. The socialist Boleslaw Limanow- ski, speaking of the January Insurrection, termed it "a manifestation of the national spirit," and argued that the insurrectionary movement contributed to the democratiza- tion of the masses, instilling in their hearts " a feeling of human dignityand enkin- dling national sentiment."*' This emphasis upon the active struggle for independence permeated inter-war Polish historiography : it suited the mood of a natio~lenjoying independence for the first time in 123 years, and was politically convenient for the Pilsudski camp, which readily associated itself with this tradition, having itself engaged the enemy in armed p om bat.^' This veneration obscured the fact that organic work, Bobrzyriski's second alter- native, was also a reaction to the loss of independence and to the deeply felt need to preserve the nation's heritage in the face of foreign occupation.
    [Show full text]