M6 J16-19 Smart Motorway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

M6 J16-19 Smart Motorway M6 Junctions 16 to 19 Smart Motorway Environmental Assessment Report FINAL, Rev.0 October 2014 M6 Junction 16 to 19 SM Scheme Environmental Assessment Report CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND POLICIES ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 NEED FOR THIS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT ................................................................................................. 3 1.4 SCOPE AND CONTENT.............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2 PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.3 ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 6 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 3.2 PROPOSED M6 J16‐19 SM DESIGN .......................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 CONSTRUCTION PROPOSALS ................................................................................................................................... 14 3.4 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................................. 17 4 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 18 4.1 SCOPING ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................................................................... 18 4.2 CONSULTATION .................................................................................................................................................... 18 4.3 STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 4.4 BASELINE CONDITIONS AND THE ‘DO MINIMUM’ SCENARIO ......................................................................................... 19 4.5 DATA GATHERING AND STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ................................................................................................ 20 4.6 IDENTIFYING POTENTIAL EFFECTS ............................................................................................................................ 20 4.7 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES .............................................................................................................................. 20 4.8 MITIGATION MEASURES, ENHANCEMENT AND RESIDUAL EFFECTS ................................................................................. 21 5 TOPICS SCOPED OUT ...................................................................................................................................... 22 5.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 22 5.2 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ............................................................................................................................................. 22 5.3 LANDSCAPE ......................................................................................................................................................... 22 5.4 MATERIALS ......................................................................................................................................................... 23 5.5 PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES ................................................................................................................................... 23 5.6 VEHICLE TRAVELLERS ............................................................................................................................................ 24 5.7 ROAD DRAINAGE AND THE WATER ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................................................... 25 6 AIR QUALITY .................................................................................................................................................. 26 6.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 26 6.2 STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................................................................ 26 6.3 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................................................... 26 6.4 MODELLING AND ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 30 6.5 EXISTING AIR QUALITY (BASELINE CONDITIONS) ......................................................................................................... 35 6.6 POTENTIAL EFFECTS .............................................................................................................................................. 43 6.7 OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SM SCHEME’S AIR QUALITY EFFECTS ...................................................... 56 6.8 MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................................................................................................ 57 6.9 RESIDUAL EFFECTS ................................................................................................................................................ 59 6.10 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................... 59 7 ECOLOGY AND NATURE CONSERVATION ........................................................................................................ 60 7.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 60 7.2 STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................................................................ 60 7.3 RELEVANT LEGISLATIVE, PLANS POLICIES AND BACKGROUND ........................................................................................ 60 7.4 BASELINE CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 61 7.5 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................. 67 7.6 RESOURCE SENSITIVITY .......................................................................................................................................... 72 7.7 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................................................... 72 Rev.: 0 ii Issued: 22/10/14 M6 Junction 16 to 19 SM Scheme Environmental Assessment Report 7.8 POTENTIAL EFFECTS .............................................................................................................................................. 73 7.9 MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................................................................................................ 82 7.10 RESIDUAL EFFECTS ................................................................................................................................................ 85 7.11 DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE OF EFFECTS .......................................................................................................... 87 7.12 MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................................................... 87 7.13 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................... 87 8 NOISE AND VIBRATION .................................................................................................................................. 89 8.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • (1202 Sq M) Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, Junction 10
    Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, Junction 10 M53, CH2 4HY High quality office accommodation 1,545 sq ft (144 sq m) to 12,940 sq ft (1202 sq m) Enter COLISEUM RETAIL PARK McDONALD’S CHESHIRE OAKS M53 MARKS & SPENCER SAINSBURYS HARLEY DAVIDSON Aerial Location MITCHELL GROUP LEXUS Description B5132 J10 Availability Terms A5117 Contact EPC Certificates Download Print Exit A5058 TO THE NORTH Location 10/21A M57 TO MANCHESTER 1 LIVERPOOL AND THE EAST The Oaks Office Park occupies a highly MERSEY TUNNELS 6/1 M62 BIRKENHEAD prominent position off Stanney Mill Road, A5300 WARRINGTON MANCHESTER AIRPORT immediately adjacent to Junction 10 of A561 WIDNES M53 RUNCORN BRIDGE 9/20/20A the M53 mid Wirral motorway and less N A41 LIVERPOOL JOHN RUNCORN LENNONAIRPORT than 1 mile from the M56/M53 M56 A49 interchange. Ellesmere Port and Chester A533 M6 are approximately 1 mile and 7 miles ELLESMERE PORT A550 away respectively. NORTHWICH 11/15 A533 There are a wide range of amenities A5517 A54 A56 A55 QUEENSFERRY 12 available at Cheshire Oaks including the WINSFORD TO NORTH WALES CHESTER Designer Outlet Village, the new Marks & & ANGLESEY BIRMINGHAM Spencer, Coliseum Leisure Park and the AND THE A51 SOUTH A55 Travel Lodge hotel. All are readily A494 A530 accessible from the Oaks Office Park RUTHIN A483 A51 being situated directly opposite on the CREWE A534 western side of the motorway, also served by J10. NANTWICH M53 A41 STANNEY MILL ROAD WREXHAM CHESHIRE OAKS COLISEUM WAY TO SNOWDONIA NATIONAL PARK A530 A529 STANNEY MILL LANE Aerial COLISEUM Drive Times CHESHIRE Location OAKS WAY Destination Distance Drive Time COLISEUM WAY (miles) (minutes) Description A5117 B5132 J10 Availability M56 motorway 1 2 LONGLOOMS ROAD BLUE STANNEY LANE PLANET Chester 7 10 AQUARIUM BLUE A5117 Terms PLANE M6 motorway 20 25 AQUARIUM Contact Liverpool Airport 23 32 M53 Manchester Airport 30 25 EPC Certificates Download Print Exit Description The development comprises a two storey terrace providing four self-contained office buildings with ample car parking.
    [Show full text]
  • The Warburtons of Hale Barns
    The Warburtons of Hale Barns Last Updated 5th September 2021 ©2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 Ray Warburton PREFACE This is my own tree. It originated in Hale Barns and was well established by 1600. My earliest certain ancestor is George (died 1639), but there is evidence his father was Thomas (died 1634). The tree is shown in several charts to make them a manageable size.The Ringley Clan is linked by DNA and is probably linked genealogically to the Mobberley branch. Table of Contents Hale Barns Preface i Surnames 1 Descendants of Thomas Warburton & Alice First Generation 3 Second Generation 5 Third Generation 8 Fourth Generation 11 Fifth Generation 18 Sixth Generation 30 Seventh Generation 44 Eighth Generation 61 Ninth Generation 95 Tenth Generation 140 Eleventh Generation 178 Twelfth Generation 206 Place Index 214 Person Index 251 ii Surnames A Artingstall, Ashley, Ashworth, Atkinson B Bailey, Bancks, Bancroft, Barber, Barlow, Barnett, Barrington, Barrow, Batty, Bayley, Beech, Bennet, Bennett, Bentley, Benton, Beswick, Bibby, Birch, Blackhurst, Blackshaw, Bleakly, Blomeley, Blows, Boon, Booth, Bourne, Bowers, Bracegirdle, Braddock, Bradshaw, Bray, Brereton, Brocklehurst, Brook, Broughton, Burden, Burgess, Burrows, Burton C Carter, Cartwright, Castalaneli, Cheetham, Cherry, Clarke, Clements, Cliff, Cliffe, Coan, Colclough, Colley, Collis, Consterdine, Cooke, Cooper, Coppock, Coxon, Cragg, Cresswell, Crosby, Cross, Crowe D Dalenoord, Darbyshire, Darlington, Davenport, Davies, Dean, Deardon, Debenham, Devis, Dicken, Dickin, Dooley, Durber, Dutton
    [Show full text]
  • 160 Great Britain for Updates, Visit Wigan 27 28
    160 Great Britain For Updates, visit www.routex.com Wigan 27 28 Birkenhead Liverpool M62 36 Manchester Stockport M56 Mold Chester 35 Congleton Wrexham 59 M6 Shrewsbury 64 65 07 Wolverhampton Walsall West Bromwich Llandrindod Birmingham Wells Solihull M6 03 Coventry Warwick02 Carmarthen Hereford 01 51 60 Neath M5 Swansea 06 Pontypridd Bridgend Caerphilly Newport Cardiff M4 13 Barry Swindon M5 Bristol 61 14 Weston-super-Mare Kingswood 31 Bath 32 M4 05 Trowbridge 62 Newbury Taunton M5 20 Yeovil Winchester Exeter Southampton 55 Exmouth M27 Poole Lymington Bournemouth Plymouth Torbay Newport GB_Landkarte.indd 160 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 161 Wakefield 16 Huddersfield Hull Barnsley Doncaster Scunthorpe Grimsby Rotherham Sheffield M1 Louth 47M1 Heanor Derby Nottingham 48 24 Grantham 15 Loughborough 42 King's Leicester Lynn 39 40 Aylsham Peterborough Coventry Norwich GB 46 01 Warwick Huntingdon Thetford Lowestoft 45 M1 Northampton 02 43 44 Cambridge Milton Bedford Keynes Biggleswade Sawston 18 M40 19 Ipswich Luton Aylesbury Oxford Felixstowe Hertford 21 50 M25 M11 Chelmsford 61 30 53 52 Slough London Bracknell Southend-on-Sea Newbury Grays 54 Wokingham 29 Rochester Basingstoke 22 M3 Guildford M2 M25 Maidstone Winchester 23 M20 17 M27 Portsmouth Chichester Brighton La Manche Calais Newport A16 A26 Boulogne-sur-Mer GB_Landkarte.indd 161 05.11.12 12:44 162 Great Britain Forfar Perth Dundee 58 Stirling Alloa 34 Greenock M90 Dumbarton Kirkintilloch Dunfermline 57 Falkirk Glasgow Paisley Livingston Edinburgh Newton M8 Haddington Mearns 04 56 Dalkeith 26 Irvine Kilmarnock Ayr Hawick A74(M) 41 Dumfries 25 Morpeth Newcastle Carlisle Upon Whitley Bay 12Tyne 08 South Shields Gateshead 09 11 Durham 49 Redcar 33 Stockton-on-Tees M6 Middlesbrough 10 38 M6 A1(M) 37 Harrogate York 63 M65 Bradford Leeds Beverley M6 28 M62 Wakefield Wigan 16 27 Huddersfield Birkenhead Liverpool Manchester Barnsley M62 Scunthorpe 35 36Stockport Doncaster Rotherham Sheffield GB_Landkarte.indd 162 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 163 GPS Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Consultation Report – December 2015
    Public Consultation Report – December 2015 M6 Junction 10 Improvements Contents Section Title Page/s 1 Introduction 3-5 1.1 Main Objectives 3 1.2 Scheme Options 4 1.3 Project Timescale 5 2 Consultation exercise 6-9 2.1 Overview 6-7 2.2 Promoting the consultation 8 2.3 Questionnaires 9 3 Questionnaire results and analysis 10-18 3.1 Travel behaviour 10-12 3.2 Proposed improvement 13-18 4.0 Conclusion 19 5.0 Further information - contact details 20 6.0 Appendices 21 2 1.0 Introduction Walsall Council is working in partnership with Highways England to improve Junction 10 of the M6 motorway (M6J10). As a busy route between Walsall and Wolverhampton, the junction is often heavily congested and this reduces the attractiveness of the local area for business and investment, including within the nearby Black Country Enterprise Zone. Walsall Council and Highways England are developing plans to provide a long term improvement to M6 Junction 10. The non-statutory public consultation events held in December 2015 presented the current scheme options and sought comments and feedback to inform the final decision and help shape the design. 1.1 Main objectives of the scheme There are three main objectives of the M6J10 scheme. The first objective is to reduce congestion. By improving M6J10, congestion can be reduced on the A454 Black Country Route eastbound to improve journey time reliability. This is critical to the needs of local residents, businesses and the 120 hectares of developable land within the nearby Black Country Enterprise Zone. Congestion can be reduced on other roads linking to the junction, such as A454 Wolverhampton Road, B4464 Wolverhampton Road West and Bloxwich Lane, reducing ‘rat-running’ traffic on nearby routes parallel to the A454 Black Country Route, the A454 Wolverhampton Road and the B4464 Wolverhampton Road West.
    [Show full text]
  • Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020
    EUROPEAN PPP EXPERTISE CENTRE Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Terms of Use of this Publication The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC) is part of the Advisory Services of the European Investment Bank (EIB). It is an initiative that also involves the European Commission, Member States of the EU, Candidate States and certain other States. For more information about EPEC and its membership, please visit www.eib.org/epec. The findings, analyses, interpretations and conclusions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EIB or any other EPEC member. No EPEC member, including the EIB, accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication or any liability for any consequences arising from its use. Reliance on the information provided in this publication is therefore at the sole risk of the user. EPEC authorises the users of this publication to access, download, display, reproduce and print its content subject to the following conditions: (i) when using the content of this document, users should attribute the source of the material and (ii) under no circumstances should there be commercial exploitation of this document or its content. Purpose and Methodology This report is part of EPEC’s work on monitoring developments in the public-private partnership (PPP) market. It is intended to provide an overview of the role played by the EIB in financing PPP projects inside and outside of Europe since 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4 Detailed Proposals for Each Ward – Organised by Local Area Partnership (LAP)
    Appendix 4 Detailed proposals for each Ward – organised by Local Area Partnership (LAP) Proposed Wards within the Knutsford Local Area Partnership Knutsford Local Area Partnership (LAP) is situated towards the north-west of Cheshire East, and borders Wilmslow to the north-east, Macclesfield to the south-east and Congleton to the south. The M6 and M56 motorways pass through this LAP. Hourly train services link Knutsford, Plumley and Mobberley to Chester and Manchester, while in the east of this LAP hourly trains link Chelford with Crewe and Manchester. The town of Knutsford was the model for Elizabeth Gaskell's novel Cranford and scenes from the George C. Scott film Patton were filmed in the centre of Knutsford, in front of the old Town Hall. Barclays Bank employs thousands of people in IT and staff support functions at Radbroke Hall, just outside the town of Knutsford. Knutsford is home to numerous sporting teams such as Knutsford Hockey Club, Knutsford Cricket Club, Knutsford Rugby Club and Knutsford Football Club. Attractions include Tatton Park, home of the RHS Flower show, the stately homes Arley Hall, Tabley House and Peover Hall, and the Cuckooland Museum of cuckoo clocks. In detail, the proposals are: Knutsford is a historic, self-contained urban community with established extents and comprises the former County Ward of Knutsford, containing 7 polling districts. The Parish of Knutsford also mirrors the boundary of this proposal. Knutsford Town is surrounded by Green Belt which covers 58% of this proposed division. The proposed ward has excellent communications by road, motorway and rail and is bounded to the north by Tatton Park and to the east by Birkin Brook.
    [Show full text]
  • 09.01.07 Transport Locality Assessment
    November 2020 Transport Locality Assessments Introductory Note and Assessments – Cross-boundary allocations GMSF 2020 Table of contents 1. Background 2 1.1 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF) 2 1.2 Policy Context – The National Planning Policy Framework 3 1.3 Policy Context – Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040 5 1.4 Structure of this Note 9 2. Site Selection 10 2.1 The Process 10 2.2 Greater Manchester Accessibility Levels 13 3. Approach to Strategic Modelling 15 4. Approach to Technical Analysis 17 4.1 Background 17 4.2 Approach to identifying Public Transport schemes 18 4.3 Mitigations and Scheme Development 19 5. Conclusion 23 6. GMSF Allocations List 24 Appendix A - GMA1.1 Northern Gateway - Heywood / Pilsworth Locality Assessment A1 Appendix B - GMA1.2 Northern Gateway - Simister and Bowlee Locality Assessment B1 Appendix C - GMA2 Stakehill Locality Assessment C1 Appendix D - GMA3.1 Roundthorn Medipark Extension and GMA3.2 Timperley Wedge Locality Assessment D1 1 1. Background 1.1 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF) 1.1.1 The GMSF is a joint plan of all ten local authorities in Greater Manchester, providing a spatial interpretation of the Greater Manchester Strategy which will set out how Greater Manchester should develop over the next two decades up to the year 2037. It will: ⚫ identify the amount of new development that will come forward across the 10 Local Authorities, in terms of housing, offices, and industry and warehousing, and the main areas in which this will be focused; ⚫ ensure we have an appropriate supply of land to meet this need; ⚫ protect the important environmental assets across the conurbation; ⚫ allocate sites for employment and housing outside of the urban area; ⚫ support the delivery of key infrastructure, such as transport and utilities; ⚫ define a new Green Belt boundary for Greater Manchester.
    [Show full text]
  • 89 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    89 bus time schedule & line map 89 Northwich - Lostock Gralam - Pickmere - Knutsford View In Website Mode The 89 bus line (Northwich - Lostock Gralam - Pickmere - Knutsford) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Knutsford: 6:45 AM - 1:50 PM (2) Northwich: 9:12 AM - 1:02 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 89 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 89 bus arriving. Direction: Knutsford 89 bus Time Schedule 24 stops Knutsford Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 6:45 AM - 1:50 PM Northwich Interchange Stand D, Northwich Watling Street, Northwich Tuesday 6:45 AM - 1:50 PM Police Station, Northwich Wednesday 6:45 AM - 1:50 PM F21 First Floor Meadow Street, Northwich Thursday 6:45 AM - 1:50 PM Hadƒeld Street, Northwich Friday 6:45 AM - 1:50 PM Bartons Place, Northwich Saturday 7:50 AM - 3:50 PM Railway Station, Northwich Tesco, Northwich Ann Street, Northwich 89 bus Info Ann Street, Northwich Civil Parish Direction: Knutsford Stops: 24 Renshaw Street, Northwich Trip Duration: 37 min Renshaw Street, Northwich Civil Parish Line Summary: Northwich Interchange Stand D, Northwich, Police Station, Northwich, Hadƒeld Princess Street, Northwich Street, Northwich, Railway Station, Northwich, Tesco, Princess Street, Northwich Civil Parish Northwich, Ann Street, Northwich, Renshaw Street, Northwich, Princess Street, Northwich, Gri∆ths Gri∆ths Road, Lostock Gralam Road, Lostock Gralam, Post O∆ce, Lostock Gralam, Shell Garage, Lostock Gralam, Langford Road, Post O∆ce, Lostock Gralam
    [Show full text]
  • Knutsford to Bowdon Improvement) Development Consent Order 201[…]
    The Planning Act 2008 The A556 (Knutsford to Bowdon Improvement) Development Consent Order 201[…] Examining Authority’s Report of Findings and Conclusions and Recommendation to the Secretary of State for Transport _______________________________________ Peter Robottom MA(Oxon) DipTP MRTPI MCMI Examining Authority Report to the Secretary of State 1 This page intentionally left blank Report to the Secretary of State 1 ExA’s findings and conclusions and recommendation in respect of The A556 (Knutsford to Bowdon Improvement) Development Consent Order 201[…] File Ref: TR010002 The application by the Highways Agency (HA), dated 23 April 2013, was made under section 37 of the Planning Act 2008 and was received in full by The Planning Inspectorate on 24 April 2013. On 24 January 2014, the applicant formally submitted changes to the original application and on 17 February 2014, the Secretary of State accepted these changes as non- material alterations. This report addresses the application as amended. The application was accepted for examination on 17 May 2013. The examination of the application began on 3 September 2013 and was completed on 3 March 2014. The development proposed comprises a 7.5 kilometre/4.7 mile improvement to the A556 trunk road in Cheshire between M6 Junction 19 near Knutsford, Cheshire and M56 Junction 7 near Bowdon in Greater Manchester. The scheme would improve the route to a consistent standard of modern dual carriageway. Its main aspects, as shown diagrammatically on the scheme plan in the Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary (APP-032), include: . construction of a new, dual carriageway standard section of the A556 from M6 Junction 19 to a point north of Bucklow Hill to bypass Tabley, Mere and Bucklow Hill; .
    [Show full text]
  • Pick up Points
    Pick Up Points Please note pick up times will be confirmed with your final joining details. Please note not all pickup points will run on every tour. Abercynon Ampthill Bakewell Aberdare Andover Baldock Aberdeen Annan Baldock Services (A1(M)) Aberdeen (ABZ) Annandale Water Services Banbury (A74(M)) Abergavenny Bangor Arbroath Abergele Banstead Armthorpe Abingdon Bargoed Arnold Abington Services (M74) Barking Arundel Accrington Barnet Ashbourne Acle Barnetby Top Services Ashburton (M180) Adlington Ashby-de-la-Zouch Barnoldswick Alcester Ashford Barnsley Alcester Oversley Mill Services (A46) Ashington Barnstaple Aldershot Ashton-in-Makerfield Barrow-in-Furness Aldridge Ashton-under-Lyne Barry Alfreton Aspatria Barton-le-Clay Alnwick Astley Barton-upon-Humber Alsager Atherstone Basildon Alton Atherton Basingstoke Altrincham Attleborough Bath Amble Audenshaw Batley Ambleside Axminster Battle Amersham Aylesbury Bawtry Amesbury Countess Ayr Beaconsfield Services (A303) Bembridge Beaconsfield Services Amesbury Solstice Park (M40) Britannia Grand Burstin Services (A303) Bebington Britannia Grand Ammanford Pont Abraham Scarborough Beccles Services (M4) Pick Up Points Please note pick up times will be confirmed with your final joining details. Please note not all pickup points will run on every tour. Beckenham Birmingham Bourne Bedford Birmingham (BHX) Bournemouth Bedlington Birtley Bournemouth (BOH) Bedworth Bishop Auckland Brackley Beeston Bishop's Cleeve Bracknell Belfast (BFS) Bishop's Stortford Bradford Belper Bradford-on-Avon Birchanger Green
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Environment Knutsford to Bowdon Preliminary
    Improving the environment Knutsford to Bowdon A556 Preliminary Environmental Information Non-Technical Summary Public consultation • January to April 2012 A556 – Improving the environment – Knutsford to Bowdon Non-Technical Summary Introduction Why the Preston improvement M6 M66 ROCHDALE Leeds The Highways Agency is planning improvements is needed M61 BOLTON M62 to the A556 between Junction 19 of the M6 and Junction 7 of the M56. Having considered The A556 is a major the views expressed by the public at previous strategic route, WIGAN M61 A663 M60 consultations in Spring 2007 and Autumn 2009, and the only non- M60 the Secretary of State for Transport announced an motorway section Amended Preferred Route for the scheme in March on the link between MANCHESTER M602 2010. Manchester and M6 M67 Birmingham. It M62 M60 We have designed the proposed A556 scheme carries up to 51,500 Liverpool M60 with the objective of minimising, as far as possible, vehicles per day, M62 A5103 WARRINGTON STOCKPORT its negative effects on the environment. We are also and this figure M56 M6 seeking opportunities to provide environmental is expected to M56 Junction 8 BOWDON improvements. We have carried out an Environmental increase over time. M56 Manchester Airport Impact Assessment for the scheme, which has The existing road is A556 M56 an important influence on the design. We have mainly single four- WILMSLOW published a document called the Preliminary lane carriageway, M6 Junction 19 KNUTSFORD A556 Knutsford to Bowdon M6 Scheme Environmental Information. The Preliminary and has junctions Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. © Crown copyright and database right 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Find out More on Junction 11 M56, Cheshire from 8,000 to 500,000 Sqft
    J11 M56 Design & build opportunities from 8,000 to 500,000 sqft Find out more on Junction 11 M56, Cheshire Intro Masterplan Design & build Location Connectivity Amenities Occupiers Gallery Contact Why Daresbury Park? Daresbury Park is a key strategic site for business development and growth with over 5 million people living within 5 million people a 45 minute drive time of the park. within 45 mins Comprising 225 acres (91 hectares) with planning consent for approximately 1.6 million square feet, the park provides an exceptional environment which is already home to numerous international businesses. Daresbury Park benefits from direct access onto the M56 motorway at junction 11 and is equidistant between Planning for Manchester and Liverpool airports (15 miles). 1.6 million sqft The M6 and M62 motorways are both within a 10 minute drive. The park has excellent on-site amenities with Daresbury Park Hotel offering extensive conference facilities, coffee shop, restaurants and leisure facilities including a gymnasium, spa and swimming pool. Manchester & Liverpool airports 20 mins Daresbury Park is owned by Marshall CDP, an established local developer with 100 years of experience, who have delivered over 2 million square feet of commercial space in the last 5 years alone. M6 & M62 motorways 10 mins Intro Masterplan Design & build Location Connectivity Amenities Occupiers Gallery Contact Masterplan Site 3 Site 1 Masterplan Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Daresbury Park can cater for building sizes ranging from 8,000 to 500,000 sqft and a number of options can be presented on the site to suit an organisation’s preference.
    [Show full text]