DOCSLIB.ORG

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict a Lecture/Discussion Series Don Gall, Facilitator First Congregational Church, UCC, Eugene, Oregon Summer, 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict a Lecture/Discussion Series Don Gall, Facilitator First Congregational Church, UCC, Eugene, Oregon Summer, 2021 The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict A Lecture/Discussion Series Don Gall, Facilitator First Congregational Church, UCC, Eugene, Oregon Summer, 2021 Session VI The Long and Rocky Road to Peace The Middle-East Peace Process has been “in process” since the first armistice agreement was signed in 1949 and to this day it continues to be more “process” than “product.” Beginning in the 1970s, there were parallel efforts to negotiate agreements between Israel and individual Arab states as well as between Israel and the Palestinians. There was a peace accord between Israel and Egypt in 1979, a peace treaty (in name only with Lebanon) in 1983, and another agreement between Israel and Jordan in 1994. In 2002, Saudi Arabia agreed to live in peace with Israel if Israel would withdraw from the occupied Palestinian territories and allow the refugees to return. Israel refused the terms, but in 2020, diplomatic relations were established between the two countries. No other agreements, accords or treaties have been signed by Israel with either Syria or Iran, or concerning the Palestinian refugees and those living under Israeli occupation in the territories. In the meantime, Iran remains hostile and continues to support the Palestinian militant/terrorist groups, Hamas and Hezbollah, in their efforts to terrorize and ultimately destroy Israel. The Palestinians have said that they are willing to grant Israel’s right to exist in return for the withdrawal of Israeli forces from the West Bank and the Gaza strip and for the right to bring their refugees home to a self-determining Palestinian state with established borders. They favor a two- state solution, but think Israel offers too little in negotiations and that its actions and motifs cannot always be trusted. Israel, on the other hand, has said it will return control of the occupied territories in exchange for an end to the violence and is open to discussing a two-state solution as long as the president of the Arab Authority is the negotiator and not Hamas. Zionist hardliners want to annex all of the Palestinian territory and are of the opinion that Palestinians are more eager to get than they are to give. The United States insists that Israel must give up some of the land it conquered in 1967 if peace is ever to be realized, and that Palestinians must renounce the use of terror and agree to Israel’s right to exist in exchange for their own right to self- determination. American Jews, as a whole, tend to be pro-Israel, but there is a sizeable number who have openly criticized Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians and insist that a peaceful settlement must be found in place of continued hostilities. Since the 1947 armistice which ended the first Arab-Israeli war, there have been numerous plans, conferences, and proposals, all in the interests of achieving a lasting peace between the two parties. There has been an Allon Plan, a Rogers Plan, the Geneva Conference of 1973, the Camp David Accords in 1978, the Madrid Conference in 1991, the Oslo Accords in 1993, and the Camp David Summit of 2000. The most recent “peace overture” was a handshaking photo-op staged in a hotel room where representatives of both sides smiled at the camera. There have been peace initiatives offered by each recent U.S. president, including George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack 1 Obama, and most recently Donald Trump, who assured the world that if anyone could bring peace to the Middle East, his son-in-law Jared Kushner could, but unfortunately, he also failed. Although Israel has been involved in a state of protracted conflict and in a cycle of wars since before its founding in 1948, a massive peace movement did not emerge within Israel until its war in Lebanon during 1982-1985. The loss of nearly 1,300 Israeli soldiers in the fighting set off a nation-wide protest within Israel, out of which a massive women’s peace movement emerged known as Mothers Against Silence. It was then that motherhood was politicized and turned into a legitimate resource to engage in issues of peace and security. While the men continued to pound their chests and tried to destroy one another, it was the women, particularly “the mothers,” who ultimately stepped across the line and embraced one another, offering common sense strategies and objectives for living together in peace. During the first Intifada in Gaza (1988) a small group of Israeli women in Jerusalem launched a protest movement known as Women in Black. The movement spread into the central and northern parts of Israel where Israeli-Jewish and Palestinian-Israeli women came together in common cause. The purpose of the movement was threefold: to protest the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories and the cycle of Israeli-Palestinian violence, to decry the oppression of the Palestinian people, and to warn against the concomitant moral corruption of Israeli society. It was also a direct challenge to the all-male monopoly over participation in the public realm. Their demand to voice their opinions on issues of peace and security as citizens of equal standing--not only as mothers or wives of soldiers--undermined both the male monopoly in this realm and the logic that governs gender relations in Israel. An emergent movement grew out of Women in Black in 1999 and was named New Profile--the Movement for the Civilization of Israeli Society. It declared as it’s aim the long-range goal “to change the profile of Israeli society from a militarized society of war and might to an actively peacemaking community in which the rights of all people are respected and promoted equally, and the military occupation of others’ land comes to an end.” After twenty years of activity, the women’s peace movement in Israel had expanded and become a major actor in the Israeli public sphere. Today, it remains among the innovative forces in Israeli society, constantly striving for new ways of imagining its collective identity and furthering the goal of peace. Whether or not its efforts for peace are paying off or not, only time will tell, but the recent Israeli election which has replaced the strict Zionist, Benjamin Netanyahu, with a new coalition government made up of an ultra-conservative Zionist, a moderate Israeli-Jew, and a middle-of- the-road Palestinian- Arab party leader has many people guardedly hopeful. While some fear that Monsour Abbas of the United Arab Point party may have “sold out” Palestinian’s interests by becoming part of the coalition, others see his presence as a political break-through and a sign of Palestinian participation in shaping the future. Where high-ranking political officials, treaties, accords and agreements have often come up short, it is often the words and witness of mothers and women-in-general who have opened doors to new understandings and possibilities for peace. For it is they who, perhaps better than anyone else, know the pain and suffering associated with the loss of a child or another loved one to the violence of war. It is often women who translate the prayers and supplications of people in churches and temples and mosques all over the world from mere words into concrete actions that help produce the desired results. As Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said: “Peace is not just a distant goal, but the means by which we arrive at that goal.” 2 So let us also join with the women of Israel-Palestine and others who yearn for peace in the world, who know that war makes murderers out of decent people, and who therefore are working tirelessly toward the day envisioned by the prophet Micah, who spoke of a time when: “Nations shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore; but they shall sit everyone under their fig tree, and none shall make them afraid, for the Lord has spoken. Micah 4:3b-4 *** Actions of the General synod of the United Church of Christ 1965 to 2021 The United Church of Christ was formed in 1957 through a union of four predecessor denominations. The General Synod, which is its national governing body, and which is often attended by 2,000-plus members, gathers every biennium to celebrate the church’s faith and life, to conduct the business of the church, and to take action on the pressing issues of peace and justice in the world. As such, the Synod has met 32 times, and during that time has addressed the Israeli-Palestinian conflict 20 times. No other single issue on the world’s stage has claimed as much of the UCCs time and prayerful deliberation during the 64 years of its existence as has this one. Below is a summary of some of the actions taken from 1965 through 2021. • 1965 - Called upon the U.S. government to use its good offices to bring about peace in the Middle East and to assure just treatment for the Arab refugees and relief of their suffering. • 1969 - Authorized its own Council for Christian Social Action to prepare and disseminate a program of education and action among UCC congregations on the Middle East dispute. • 1971 - Approved continued support for programs of relief and rehabilitation for Arab refugees in cooperation with sister churches in the Middle East and to respond to the call of those churches. • 1973 - Declared that peace and security can be attained only through a just and stable political settlement which takes into account the right of the State of Israel to exist and also the rights of the Palestinian people.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israel-Palestine Through the Lens of Game Theory
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Economics Department Working Paper Series Economics 2021 Land for peace? Israel-Palestine through the lens of game theory Amal Ahmad Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/econ_workingpaper Part of the Economics Commons Recommended Citation Ahmad, Amal, "Land for peace? Israel-Palestine through the lens of game theory" (2021). Economics Department Working Paper Series. 301. https://doi.org/10.7275/21792057 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Economics at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Economics Department Working Paper Series by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Land for peace? Israel-Palestine through the lens of game theory Amal Ahmad∗ February 2021 Abstract Why have Israel and the Palestinians failed to implement a \land for peace" solution, along the lines of the Oslo Accords? This paper studies the applica- tion of game theory to this question. I show that existing models of the conflict largely rely on unrealistic assumptions about what the main actors are trying to achieve. Specifically, they assume that Israel is strategically interested in withdrawing from the occupied territories pending resolvable security concerns but that it is obstructed from doing so by violent Palestinians with other objec- tives. I use historical analysis along with bargaining theory to shed doubt on this assumption, and to argue that the persistence of conflict has been aligned with, not contrary to, the interests of the militarily powerful party, Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociographie De La Doxa Coloniale Israélienne
    Université de Montréal Se représenter dominant et victime : sociographie de la doxa coloniale israélienne par Michaël Séguin Département de sociologie Faculté des arts et sciences Thèse présentée en vue de l’obtention du grade de Philosophiae Doctor (Ph.D.) en sociologie Août 2018 © Michaël Séguin, 2018 Université de Montréal Faculté des études supérieures et postdoctorales Cette thèse intitulée : Se représenter dominant et victime : sociographie de la doxa coloniale israélienne Présentée par : Michaël Séguin a été évaluée par un jury composé des personnes suivantes : Deena White, présidente-rapporteuse et représentante du doyen Paul Sabourin, directeur de recherche Yakov Rabkin, codirecteur de recherche Barbara Thériault, membre du jury Rachad Antonius, examinateur externe Résumé Dans un monde majoritairement postcolonial, Israël fait figure d’exception alors même que se perpétue sa domination d’un autre peuple, les Arabes palestiniens. Tandis qu’un nombre grandissant d’auteurs, y compris juifs, traitent de la question israélo-palestinienne comme d’un colonialisme de peuplement, et non plus comme d’un conflit ethnique entre groupes nationaux, se pose la question : comment une telle domination est-elle possible à l’ère des médias de masse ? Plus précisément, pourquoi cette domination est-elle si peu contestée de l’intérieur de la société israélienne alors même qu’elle contredit le discours public de l’État qui tente, par tous les moyens, de se faire accepter comme étant démocratique et éclairé ? Pour y répondre, cette thèse procède à une analyse de la connaissance de sens commun israélienne afin de détecter à la fois le mode de connaissance, issu des relations sociales, privilégié pour faire sens des rapports ethnonationaux, mais aussi la manière dont cette doxa vient légitimer la domination des Palestiniens.
    [Show full text]
  • Cry for Hope, an Urgent Call to End the Oppression of the Palestinian People
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Global Coalition of Christians Issues Call for Palestinian Justice A growing list of church leaders and justice advocates sign on to the call Bethlehem, Palestine, July 1, 2020— Kairos Palestine and Global Kairos for Justice, a broad network of allies including Palestinian Christians and international friends of Kairos Palestine, issue Cry for Hope, an urgent call to end the oppression of the Palestinian people. Rifat Kassis, General Coordinator of Kairos Palestine, explains, “The Body of Christ can no longer stand by as world leaders and the international community trample on the rights of Palestinians to dignity, justice and self-determination under international law. The integrity of the Christian faith itself is at stake.” The authors of this international call describe the release as coming at a time of global emergencies, when the world has been summoned to turn its attention to the most vulnerable. They point to movements around the world that are seeking to bring down the structures of racism, ethnic cleansing, and the violation of land and its resources. Cry for Hope: A Call to Decisive Action makes the case that, as Israel announces its annexation plans, a critical point has been reached in the struggle to end the oppression of the Palestinians. Authors of the Cry for Hope argue that the personal, cultural, economic and environmental suffering of Palestinians under occupation increases day-by-day. Apart from the Cry, leaders around the world have made the case that, with expected support from the U.S. administration, Israel’s annexation of an additional one-third of the West Bank, including the fertile Jordan Valley, will effectively accomplish the goal of colonizing the Palestinian homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • Concordis Papers Viii
    CONCORDIS PAPERS VIII Christian Churches and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict February 2010 Third Edition 2 Blessed are the peacemakers … Matthew 5:9 List of Contents Page 3 Introduction Rt Hon Viscount Brentford 4 Maps 5 A Note on the Purpose of this Booklet (Revised for 3rd Edtion) 6 Chronology (expanded in 2nd Edition) 8 Current Political Background Dr Fiona McCallum 10 A Christian View of Israel Dr Calvin Smith 12 Biblical Perspectives on Israel and Palestine and how these Relate to the Church Revd Chris Rose 14 Summary of Discussion at Consultation 16 Working Together towards Peaceful Co‐existence Geoffrey Smith and Jerry Marshall 18 Musalaha and the Churches Dr Salim Munayer 20 The Need for a Bridging Narrative Dr Richard Harvey 22 Engaging with the Land and People Revd Mike Fuller 24 Core Christian Principle Common to All Ben White 26 The Contributors 27 About Concordis International Cover photo: © CC Or Hitch 3 Introduction Rt Hon Viscount Brentford oncordis International has worked—not always under that name—for over 25 C years to build sustainable and just peace in areas suffering from war, by developing relationships between key individuals on all sides of violent conflict and helping them together to find constructive ways forward. Our field of experience includes South Africa, Rwanda, Sudan, Kenya and Afghanistan. With respect to the Middle East, we have so far limited ourselves to the relatively modest ambitions that available funding has allowed. This paper is the eighth in a series which seeks to build on the strengths of the Concordis approach through spreading understanding of issues and the multilateral consensus developed in consultations, primarily connected with the conflicts in Sudan.
    [Show full text]
  • A Return to Defensible Borders
    A Return to Defensible Borders an iker week after his historic White House summit with United States Presi- A dent George W. Bush in April, 2004, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon stood before a packed Knesset plenum. A sense of triumph could be heard in his voice as he presented a list of American assurances that he had secured in a letter from the president. e letter was offered as a quid pro quo for Sharon’s promise to withdraw all Israeli troops and civilians from the Gaza Strip, known as the “disengagement plan.” Sharon recited the key components of the Bush letter: (i) U.S. support for the repatriation of Palestinian refugees to a future Palestinian state only, and not to Israel; (ii) an American commitment that Israel would retain large population centers in the West Bank and would therefore not be asked to return to the 1949 armistice lines, Israel’s de facto border until June 1967; (iii) a U.S. promise that there would be no other peace plan put forward except the pre- viously agreed-upon “roadmap,” which made Israeli concessions contingent upon a complete halt to Palestinian terror and incitement. is was a crucial moment for Sharon. Since he first announced his disengagement plan in December 2003 at a speech to the Herzliya Confer- ence, he had been sharply criticized by opponents both within his Likud party and among the more hard-line Knesset factions who accused him • A / • of giving up tangible assets in exchange for nothing, not even a commit- ment to peaceful coexistence, from the Palestinian side.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Christians
    Palestinian Christians Palestinian Christians are the descendants of the original indigenous Christians who first believed in Jesus Christ. They are the descendants of the disciples of Jesus Christ & the descendants of other Jews, Philistines, Arabs, Aramaeans/Eremites, Canaanites, Greeks, Romans, Persians & Samaritans... who accepted the Messiah when He was with them in the flesh. Today, they live in Nazareth, Bethlehem, Gaza, Nablus, Ramallah, Jerusalem, Jaffa, Haifa, Jenin, Taybeh, Birzeit, Jifna, al-Bireh, Zababdeh, Tel Aviv, Tubas, Azzun, Aboud, Tiberias, Sakhnin, Shefa-'Amr, Galilee, Jish, Amman, & other places in the Biblical Palestine & Jordan, in addition to the exile. They are Arab Christian Believers of Oriental Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox, Catholic (eastern & western rites), Protestant, Evangelical & other denominations, who have ethnic or family origins in Palestine. In both the local dialect of Palestinian Arabic and in classical or modern standard Arabic, Christians are called Nasrani (a derivative of the Arabic word for Nazareth, al-Nasira) or Masihi (a derivative of Arabic word Masih, meaning "Messiah"). Christians comprise less than 4% of Palestinian Arabs living within the borders of former Mandate Palestine today (around 4% in the West Bank, a negligible percentage in Gaza, and nearly 10% of Israeli Arabs). According to official British Mandate estimates, Mandate Palestine’s Christian population varied between 9.5% (1922) and 7.9% (1946) of the total population. Demographics and Denominations Today, the majority of Palestinian Christians live abroad. In 2005, it was estimated that the Christian population of the Palestinian territories was between 40,000 and 90,000 people, or 2.1 to 3.4% of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • B'tselem Report: Dispossession & Exploitation: Israel's Policy in the Jordan Valley & Northern Dead Sea, May
    Dispossession & Exploitation Israel's policy in the Jordan Valley & northern Dead Sea May 2011 Researched and written by Eyal Hareuveni Edited by Yael Stein Data coordination by Atef Abu a-Rub, Wassim Ghantous, Tamar Gonen, Iyad Hadad, Kareem Jubran, Noam Raz Geographic data processing by Shai Efrati B'Tselem thanks Salwa Alinat, Kav LaOved’s former coordinator of Palestinian fieldworkers in the settlements, Daphna Banai, of Machsom Watch, Hagit Ofran, Peace Now’s Settlements Watch coordinator, Dror Etkes, and Alon Cohen-Lifshitz and Nir Shalev, of Bimkom. 2 Table of contents Introduction......................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter One: Statistics........................................................................................................ 8 Land area and borders of the Jordan Valley and northern Dead Sea area....................... 8 Palestinian population in the Jordan Valley .................................................................... 9 Settlements and the settler population........................................................................... 10 Land area of the settlements .......................................................................................... 13 Chapter Two: Taking control of land................................................................................ 15 Theft of private Palestinian land and transfer to settlements......................................... 15 Seizure of land for “military needs”.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kairos Palestine Study Guide
    four-week congregational study plan KAIROS PALESTINE a moment of truth faith, hope, and love— a confession of faith and call to action from Palestinian Christians 1 Mennonite Central Committee | Matthew Lester Mennonite Central Committee worker Ed Nyce talked with Abdul J’wad Jabar, whose farm bordered an Israeli settlement in the valley of Bequa’a, Palestine, in 2001. MCC’s partner organizations in Palestine and Israel identified information-sharing as MCC’s most helpful contribution toward peace. CONTENTS SECTION 1 ...............................................................................1 What is the Kairos Palestine document and why should we study it? SECTION 2 ...............................................................................4 The reality on the ground—background facts and maps SECTION 3 ...............................................................................9 A four-week lesson plan outline for congregational study SECTION 4 ............................................................................. 14 Brief history of Mennonite involvement in Palestine-Israel SECTION 5 ............................................................................. 16 The text of the Kairos document © 2016 Israel/Palestine Mission Network of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and Mennonite Palestine Israel Network (MennoPIN) ISBN 978-1-5138-0108-7 2 four-week congregational study plan KAIROS PALESTINE a moment of truth INTRODUCTION Kairos Palestine is the Christian Palestinian’s word to the world about what is happening in Palestine. Its importance stems from the sincere expression of Palestinian Christian concerns for their people and their view of the moment of history they are living through. It is deeply committed to Jesus’ way of love and nonviolence even in the face of entrenched injustice. It seeks to be prophetic in addressing things as they are, without equivocation. It is a contemporary, ecumenical confession of faith and call to action.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's National Security and West Bank Settlements
    Israel’s National Security and West Bank Settlements Israel’s National Security and West Bank Settlements Academic supervision: Dr. Avner Inbar and Dr. Assaf Sharon Research and writing: Avishay Ben-Sasson Gordis Additional writing and editing: Yonatan Levi Additional research: Shai Agmon © All rights reserved to Molad - Center for the Translation: Michelle Bubis Renewal of Democracy Ltd. Contents Introduction and key findings 4 Chapter 1: From strategy to excuse: The history of the security argument 7 Chapter 2: The settlements as security burden 14 Chapter 3: National security without settlements 26 Summary: The battle over security 36 4 Introduction and key findings The single greatest challenge to Israel’s national security is the conflict with the Palestinians. While it would be mistaken to reduce the entire Israeli-Palestinian conflict to a single factor, the territorial question is arguably the determinative cause underlying the intractability of the conflict. The territorial question, in turn, is inextricably tied to Israel’s establishment of settlements – i.e., civilian communities - beyond the Green Line. Yet despite the conflict’s influence on Israel’s security, and even though the settlements will play a crucial role in determining the future of the conflict, public debate has sorely lacked serious discussion of the settlements’ impact on Israel’s national security. This paper attempts to fill the void by providing a comprehensive, fact-based analysis of the implications of the settlement enterprise on Israeli security. The analysis is backed by data and by input from Israel’s leading security professionals. The goal of this paper is not to end the debate but rather to spark it – in the hope that, even in the current muddy political climate, it will be possible to responsibly discuss a matter vital to the future of all Israelis.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded License
    Exchange 49 (2020) 257-277 brill.com/exch The Revival of Palestinian Christianity Developments in Palestinian Theology Elizabeth S. Marteijn PhD Candidate, School of Divinity, Centre for the Study of World Christianity, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK [email protected] Abstract Palestinian Christians are a minority of approximately 1 or 2% in a context marked by conflict, expulsions, and ongoing emigration. Despite all this, Palestinian Christians have made a significant contribution to society in the spheres of politics, the arts, sci- ence, and social welfare. Moreover, from the 1980s onwards, this Palestinian context of struggle has also been the source for the emergence of a socially and politically committed contextual theology. This article analyses the development of Palestinian contextual theology by examining theological publications by Palestinian theologians. It identifies liberation, reconciliation, witness, ecumenism, and interfaith-dialogue as some of the dominant theological themes. What unites these publications is a theological engagement with the Palestinian Christian identity in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Keywords contextual theology – Israeli-Palestinian conflict – Kairos theology – Palestinian Christianity – Palestinian theology – public theology 1 An Arab Christian Awakening Palestinian Christians feel deeply rooted in Palestinian society. They under- stand themselves as part of the Palestinian community and actively contribute to its flourishing. This article aims to outline how Palestinian Christians have embraced their vocation, in the words of Emeritus Patriarch Michel Sabbah, to © Elizabeth S. Marteijn, 2020 | doi:10.1163/1572543X-12341569 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0Downloaded license. from Brill.com09/30/2021 04:35:54PM via free access 258 Marteijn be “in the service of society.”1 Michel Sabbah, born in Nazareth in 1933, was con- secrated on 6th January, 1988, by Pope John Paul II as the first Palestinian-born Roman Catholic Patriarch of Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]
  • Journeying with Real People Towards the Real Bethlehem Could Transform Christmas for You and for Your Friends
    Journeying with real people towards the real Bethlehem could transform Christmas for you and for your friends. This is a precious book - precious to keep and precious to give away. Very Rev Dr A. Mclellan, Convener, World Mission Council, Church of Scotland. This book takes the traditional Advent themes of faith, hope and love and looks at them through the lens of ordinary Palestinians, who live in the land we call holy. We hope that it will both inspire you and challenge you as you make the journey towards Christmas. Maggie Lunan, Co-Chair, nativity. The traditional themes of Advent - light out of darkness, hope out of despair, the struggle to give birth to new life in the midst of difficulty and suffering - are here given a reality that is both vigorous and challenging. These reflections from people living on a knife-edge enlarge our vision. Kathy Galloway, Head of Christian Aid Scotland. World Mission Council 121 George Street Edinburgh, EH2 4YR © COS257 10/12 Scottish National Charity Number: SC0 11353 nativity supports Kairos Palestine and is involved dignity. For these reasons we support the rights of all in this resource because we want to encourage people Palestinians and Israelis to live in safety and security, to reappraise Christmas and look at all the celebrations and believe their rights are indivisible from each other. around Christmas with fresh eyes, to challenge the sentimentality of it and offer alternatives that incorporate Christian Aid welcomes the Kairos document as an ‘Just God’. As part of the bigger picture this resource important way of engaging the churches in the UK and offers the opportunity to consider the reality both of Ireland with peace and justice in Israel and the occupied Christmas past and Christmas present in Bethlehem.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Security in a Two-State Reality
    Israel’s Security in a Two-State Reality Israel’s Security in a Two-State Reality Research and writing by Dr. Omer Einav Research direction by Dr. Avner Inbar and Prof. Assaf Sharon Translation by Michelle Bubis © 2020 Molad - the Center for the Renewal of Israeli Democracy Ltd. (CIC). All rights reserved. [email protected] February 2021 We thank the various experts who gave interviews for the study. We also thank Avishay Ben Sasson-Gordis and Shai Agmon for their insightful comments. References are hyperlinked to improve readability. A comprehensive list of sources appears at the end. This publication was produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of Molad and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. This project is co-funded by the European Union 4 Contents Introduction: Security Concerns as a Key Argument against an Israeli-Palestinian Peace Deal 5 1. The Illusion of the Status Quo 12 2. An Overview of the Proposed Security Arrangements 14 3. The Chief Concern: Can the Palestinians Be Trusted? 17 4. Possible Threats and Responses 24 5. The Myth of the Settlements’ Contribution to Security 32 6. Why a Peace Deal Will Improve National Security 35 7. Conclusion 37 References 39 5 Introduction: Security Concerns as a Key Argument Against an Israeli-Palestinian Peace Deal Since the Israeli-Palestinian conflict began more than 100 years ago, various solutions have been proposed to end it, some of which have also been attempted – yet all to no avail. The only coherent, detailed and applicable proposal is to partition the land into two states, for the two peoples who live on it: a Jewish state and a Palestinian state.
    [Show full text]