EUROPEAN BROADCASTING UNION Presented by Mathias Coinchon [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EUROPEAN BROADCASTING UNION Presented by Mathias Coinchon Coinchon@Ebu.Ch ETSI SUMMIT ON STANDARDIZATION AND OPEN SOURCE EUROPEAN BROADCASTING UNION Presented by Mathias Coinchon [email protected] © All rights reserved The European Broadcasting Union The world's leading alliance of public service media 73 broadcasters members from 56 countries Represents 1040 Radio, 780 TV services Member support, media services, learning&networking Media Technology&Innovation 2 © All rights reserved WHY OPEN SOURCE ? Broacast media world © All rights reserved Broadcast Media Production: Niche market dominated by big vendors Big infrastructures, high costs Frequent lack of interoperability, vendors lock‐in Organisations: SMPTE, AES, EBU Media Distribution: highly standardised, large consumer products volumes, lots of patents Chicken&Egg situation, high costs Organisations: MPEG, ETSI, DVB, ITU, WorldDAB, DRM, EBU 4 © All rights reserved Why open source ? Promote standards, speedup development&adoption Reference and example implementations Open interfaces Avoid vendor lock‐in, deprecation Do not re‐invent the wheel Reduce costs Customisation Create a community, attract young skilled people 5 © All rights reserved SOME CASES Open source projects used in broadcasting © All rights reserved Media encoding/decoding FFMPEG, X264, Videolan VLC Used in many headends or products (sometime hidden) FLAC, Free Lossless Audio Software before the standard, de‐facto standard Used for Euroradio music exchange network Opus, low latency, resilient audio coding Standardised at IETF, maintained by Mozilla Many broadcasters interested, manufacturers are afraid Many emerging royalty free formats (daala,..) 7 © All rights reserved New media distribution CPA, Cross Platform Authentication System to associate devices with online user identity Iterative development (agile approach) Open Software Library for implementers (BSD licence) Specification on EBU website ETSI standardisation in progress EBU‐TT‐D, EBU subtitling standard Dash.js reference player integration 8 © All rights reserved Digital Radio Broadcasting ‐ mmbTools DAB: Digital Audio Broadcasting, standardised at ETSI mmbTools, open source DAB transmission chain Originally developed by CRC in Canada, GPL licence DAB multiplexer, SDR OFDM modulator Runs on generic software radio peripheral (USRP,..) Helped to democratize DAB/DAB+ for smaller radio Deployed in Denmark, France, Switzerland, UK No turnkey solution, expertise needed for integration or learning curve from users 9 © All rights reserved OUR ACTIVITIES EBU activities related to open source and software © All rights reserved Events Objectives: Inform, exchange, network, attract Open Source Meetup at IBC (~120 participants) EBU DevCon developer conference Radiohack: practical workshop for radio developpers Next: 8‐9th February 2016, Ebu, Geneva Open media devroom at FOSDEM Next:30‐31 January 2016, Brussels 11 © All rights reserved Radiohack Open source meetup at IBC 12 © All rights reserved EBU groups Strategic Program on Agile Software Collaboration Open Source Community ebu.io platform for software/service exchange github.com/ebu as a open source code repository ebu.io/opensource list code.ebu.io for software source exchange between members with a special licence 13 © All rights reserved Difficulties Patents, especially hidden patents Closed systems Software Licenses (permissive/non permissive) Grow a community of users, build confidence Change the conservative minds «If it’s free it cannot be good» «It’s not maintained, there’s no support» «I don’t want my competitors to use my software» Free software: free as in free speech, not free beer Identify good quality projects 14 © All rights reserved Conclusion Internet media world is heavily based on open source Bring the same approach to Broadcast Media ETSI is a reference platform for standardisation It could possibly also be a reference software repository ? Provide open libraries, implementation with standards ? Lighter standardisation process ? (IETF approach?) Create and link communities (not “standardize and forget”) ? Rely on existing open source communities (VideoLAN,..) ? “Less paperware, more software” 15 © All rights reserved.
Recommended publications
  • FLAC Decoder Using ARM920T Using S3C2440
    International Journal of Engineering Research and Development e-ISSN: 2278-067X, p-ISSN: 2278-800X, www.ijerd.com Volume 4, Issue 7 (November 2012), PP. 21-24 FLAC Decoder using ARM920T using S3C2440 J. L. DivyaShivani1, M. Madan Gopal 2 1M.Tech (Embedded Systems) Student, 2Assoc.Professor Aurora’s Technological & Research Institute Uppal, Hyderabad, INDIA Abstract: In this paper, an embedded FLAC decoder system was designed, and the embedded development platform of ARM920T was built for the design. Furthermore, the IIS bus of S3C2440 in Linux which were used in designing the decoder system. Results show that the FLAC format sound can play well in the decoder system. The decoding solution can be applied to many high-end audio devices. With the development of multimedia technology, as well as the people's requirements to higher sound quality, the Lossy compression coding audio format such as MP3 cannot satisfy many music lovers. Therefore, many R & D staffs have research on how to develop Lossless Audio Decoding systems based on embedded devices with lower price and better sound quality. FLAC stands for Free Lossless Audio Codec, an audio format similar to MP3, but lossless, meaning that audio is compressed in FLAC without any loss in quality. This is similar to how Zip works, except with FLAC you will get much better compression because it is designed specifically for audio, and you can play back compressed FLAC files in your favorite player (or your car or home stereo) just like you would an MP3 file. FLAC stands out as the fastest and most widely supported lossless audio codec, and the only one that at once is non-proprietary, is unencumbered by patents, has an open- source reference implementation, has a well-documented format and API, and has several other independent implementations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lossless Audio Codec Comparison
    Contents Introduction 3 1 CD-audio test 4 1.1 CD's used . .4 1.2 Results all CD's together . .4 1.3 Interesting quirks . .7 1.3.1 Mono encoded as stereo (Dan Browns Angels and Demons) . .7 1.3.2 Compressibility . .9 1.4 Convergence of the results . 10 2 High-resolution audio 13 2.1 Nine Inch Nails' The Slip . 13 2.2 Howard Shore's soundtrack for The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King . 16 2.3 Wasted bits . 18 3 Multichannel audio 20 3.1 Howard Shore's soundtrack for The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King . 20 A Motivation for choosing these CDs 23 B Test setup 27 B.1 Scripting and graphing . 27 B.2 Codecs and parameters used . 27 B.3 MD5 checksumming . 28 C Revision history 30 Bibliography 31 2 Introduction While testing the efficiency of lossy codecs can be quite cumbersome (as results differ for each person), comparing lossless codecs is much easier. As the last well documented and comprehensive test available on the internet has been a few years ago, I thought it would be a good idea to update. Beside comparing with CD-audio (which is often done to assess codec performance) and spitting out a grand total, this comparison also looks at extremes that occurred during the test and takes a look at 'high-resolution audio' and multichannel/surround audio. While the comparison was made to update the comparison-page on the FLAC website, it aims to be fair and unbiased.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Media Player Codec Pack Version 4.1 Media Player Codec Pack
    download media player codec pack version 4.1 Media Player Codec Pack. Description: In Microsoft Windows 10 it is not possible to set all file associations using an installer. Microsoft chose to block changes of file associations with the introduction of their Zune players. Third party codecs are also blocked in some instances, preventing some files from playing in the Zune players. A simple workaround for this problem is to switch playback of video and music files to Windows Media Player manually. In start menu click on the "Settings". In the "Windows Settings" window click on "System". On the "System" pane click on "Default apps". On the "Choose default applications" pane click on "Films & TV" under "Video Player". On the "Choose an application" pop up menu click on "Windows Media Player" to set Windows Media Player as the default player for video files. Footnote: The same method can be used to apply file associations for music, by simply clicking on "Groove Music" under "Media Player" instead of changing Video Player in step 4. Media Player Codec Pack Plus. Codec's Explained: A codec is a piece of software on either a device or computer capable of encoding and/or decoding video and/or audio data from files, streams and broadcasts. The word Codec is a portmanteau of ' co mpressor- dec ompressor' Compression types that you will be able to play include: x264 | x265 | h.265 | HEVC | 10bit x265 | 10bit x264 | AVCHD | AVC DivX | XviD | MP4 | MPEG4 | MPEG2 and many more. File types you will be able to play include: .bdmv | .evo | .hevc | .mkv | .avi | .flv | .webm | .mp4 | .m4v | .m4a | .ts | .ogm .ac3 | .dts | .alac | .flac | .ape | .aac | .ogg | .ofr | .mpc | .3gp and many more.
    [Show full text]
  • Tamil Flac Songs Free Download Tamil Flac Songs Free Download
    tamil flac songs free download Tamil flac songs free download. Get notified on all the latest Music, Movies and TV Shows. With a unique loyalty program, the Hungama rewards you for predefined action on our platform. Accumulated coins can be redeemed to, Hungama subscriptions. You can also login to Hungama Apps(Music & Movies) with your Hungama web credentials & redeem coins to download MP3/MP4 tracks. You need to be a registered user to enjoy the benefits of Rewards Program. You are not authorised arena user. Please subscribe to Arena to play this content. [Hi-Res Audio] 30+ Free HD Music Download Sites (2021) ► Read the definitive guide to hi-res audio (HD music, HRA): Where can you download free high-resolution files (24-bit FLAC, 384 kHz/ 32 bit, DSD, DXD, MQA, Multichannel)? Where to buy it? Where are hi-res audio streamings? See our top 10 and long hi-res download site list. ► What is high definition audio capability or it’s a gimmick? What is after hi-res? What's the highest sound quality? Discover greater details of high- definition musical formats, that, maybe, never heard before. The explanation is written by Yuri Korzunov, audio software developer with 20+ years of experience in signal processing. Keep reading. Table of content (click to show). Our Top 10 Hi-Res Audio Music Websites for Free Downloads Where can I download Hi Res music for free and paid music sites? High- resolution music free and paid download sites Big detailed list of free and paid download sites Download music free online resources (additional) Download music free online resources (additional) Download music and audio resources High resolution and audiophile streaming Why does Hi Res audio need? Digital recording issues Digital Signal Processing What is after hi-res sound? How many GB is 1000 songs? Myth #1.
    [Show full text]
  • Detail Streaming Support Protocols
    Encore+ User Guide Detail Streaming Support Protocols Supported Audio Codecs Supported Container Formats • MP3 • WAV • AAC • M4A • FLAC • OGG • LPCM/WAV/AIFF • AIFF • ALAC Supported Protocols • WMA, WMA9 • SHOUTcast • Ogg Vorbis • HTTPS Supported Playlist • WMA streaming • ASX • RTSP/SDP • M3U • PLS • WPL 43 Detail Audio Codec Support Encore+ User Guide Supported MP3 encoding parameters • Sampling rates [kHz]: 32, 44.1, 48 • Resolution [bits]: 16 • Bit rate [kbps]: 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 80, 96, 112, 128, 160, 192, 224, 256, 320, VBR • Channels: stereo, joined stereo, mono • MP3PRO playback • MP3 File extensions: *.mp3 • Decoding of ID3v1, ID3v2, MP3 ID tags including optional album art in .jpeg format up to 2 megapixels • Gapless MP3: Playback is gapless if the container provides LAME encoder delay and padding tags. Supported Vorbis encoding parameters • Sampling rates [kHz]: 32, 44.1, 48 • Resolution [bits]: 16 • Nominal bit rate [kbps] (quality level): 80 (Q1), 96 (Q2), 112 (Q3), 128 (Q4), 160 (Q5), 192 (Q6), • Channels: stereo • The audio player supports reading of Vorbis content stored in Ogg containers. Supported file name extensions: *.ogg and *.oga. • The audio player supports decoding of Vorbis comments. NOTE: There is no specification for tag names. The system relies on the OSS implementation. • Tag names decoded: TITLE, ALBUM, ARTIST, GENRE. • Binary data (e.g. for album art) is not supported. • The audio player supports gapless Vorbis playback. Supported FLAC encoding parameters • Sampling rates [kHz]: 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, 192 • Resolution [bits]: 16, 24 • Channels: stereo, mono • The audio player supports reading of FLAC content stored in native FLAC containers.
    [Show full text]
  • Opus, a Free, High-Quality Speech and Audio Codec
    Opus, a free, high-quality speech and audio codec Jean-Marc Valin, Koen Vos, Timothy B. Terriberry, Gregory Maxwell 29 January 2014 Xiph.Org & Mozilla What is Opus? ● New highly-flexible speech and audio codec – Works for most audio applications ● Completely free – Royalty-free licensing – Open-source implementation ● IETF RFC 6716 (Sep. 2012) Xiph.Org & Mozilla Why a New Audio Codec? http://xkcd.com/927/ http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/standards.png Xiph.Org & Mozilla Why Should You Care? ● Best-in-class performance within a wide range of bitrates and applications ● Adaptability to varying network conditions ● Will be deployed as part of WebRTC ● No licensing costs ● No incompatible flavours Xiph.Org & Mozilla History ● Jan. 2007: SILK project started at Skype ● Nov. 2007: CELT project started ● Mar. 2009: Skype asks IETF to create a WG ● Feb. 2010: WG created ● Jul. 2010: First prototype of SILK+CELT codec ● Dec 2011: Opus surpasses Vorbis and AAC ● Sep. 2012: Opus becomes RFC 6716 ● Dec. 2013: Version 1.1 of libopus released Xiph.Org & Mozilla Applications and Standards (2010) Application Codec VoIP with PSTN AMR-NB Wideband VoIP/videoconference AMR-WB High-quality videoconference G.719 Low-bitrate music streaming HE-AAC High-quality music streaming AAC-LC Low-delay broadcast AAC-ELD Network music performance Xiph.Org & Mozilla Applications and Standards (2013) Application Codec VoIP with PSTN Opus Wideband VoIP/videoconference Opus High-quality videoconference Opus Low-bitrate music streaming Opus High-quality music streaming Opus Low-delay
    [Show full text]
  • Game Audio the Role of Audio in Games
    the gamedesigninitiative at cornell university Lecture 18 Game Audio The Role of Audio in Games Engagement Entertains the player Music/Soundtrack Enhances the realism Sound effects Establishes atmosphere Ambient sounds Other reasons? the gamedesigninitiative 2 Game Audio at cornell university The Role of Audio in Games Feedback Indicate off-screen action Indicate player should move Highlight on-screen action Call attention to an NPC Increase reaction time Players react to sound faster Other reasons? the gamedesigninitiative 3 Game Audio at cornell university History of Sound in Games Basic Sounds • Arcade games • Early handhelds • Early consoles the gamedesigninitiative 4 Game Audio at cornell university Early Sounds: Wizard of Wor the gamedesigninitiative 5 Game Audio at cornell university History of Sound in Games Recorded Basic Sound Sounds Samples Sample = pre-recorded audio • Arcade games • Starts w/ MIDI • Early handhelds • 5th generation • Early consoles (Playstation) • Early PCs the gamedesigninitiative 6 Game Audio at cornell university History of Sound in Games Recorded Some Basic Sound Variability Sounds Samples of Samples • Arcade games • Starts w/ MIDI • Sample selection • Early handhelds • 5th generation • Volume • Early consoles (Playstation) • Pitch • Early PCs • Stereo pan the gamedesigninitiative 7 Game Audio at cornell university History of Sound in Games Recorded Some More Basic Sound Variability Variability Sounds Samples of Samples of Samples • Arcade games • Starts w/ MIDI • Sample selection • Multiple
    [Show full text]
  • The Daala Video Codec Project Next-Next Generation Video
    The Daala Video Codec Project Next-next Generation Video Timothy B. Terriberry Mozilla & The Xiph.Org Foundation ● Patents are no longer a problem for free software – We can all go home 2 Mozilla & The Xiph.Org Foundation ● Except... not quite 3 Mozilla & The Xiph.Org Foundation Carving out Exceptions in OIN (Table 0 contains one Xiph codec: FLAC) 4 Mozilla & The Xiph.Org Foundation Why This Matters ● Encumbered codecs are a billion dollar toll-tax on communications – Every cost from codecs is repeated a million fold in all multimedia software ● Codec licensing is anti-competitive – Licensing regimes are universally discriminatory – An excuse for proprietary software (Flash) ● Ignoring licensing creates risks that can show up at any time – A tax on success 5 Mozilla & The Xiph.Org Foundation The Royalty-Free Video Challenge ● Creating good codecs is hard – But we don’t need many – The best implementations of patented codecs are already free software ● Network effects decide – Where RF is established, non-free codecs see no adoption (JPEG, PNG, FLAC, …) ● RF is not enough – People care about different things – Must be better on all fronts 6 Mozilla & The Xiph.Org Foundation We Did This for Audio 7 Mozilla & The Xiph.Org Foundation The Daala Project ● Goal: Better than HEVC without infringing IPR ● Need a better strategy than “read a lot of patents” – People don’t believe you – Analysis is error-prone ● Try to stay far away from the line, but... ● One mistake can ruin years of development effort ● See: H.264 Baseline 8 Mozilla & The Xiph.Org
    [Show full text]
  • PVQ Applied Outside of Daala (IETF 97 Draft)
    PVQ Applied outside of Daala (IETF 97 Draft) Yushin Cho Mozilla Corporation November, 2016 Introduction ● Perceptual Vector Quantization (PVQ) – Proposed as a quantization and coefficient coding tool for NETVC – Originally developed for the Daala video codec – Does a gain-shape coding of transform coefficients ● The most distinguishing idea of PVQ is the way it references a predictor. – PVQ does not subtract the predictor from the input to produce a residual Mozilla Corporation 2 Integrating PVQ into AV1 ● Introduction of a transformed predictors both in encoder and decoder – Because PVQ references the predictor in the transform domain, instead of using a pixel-domain residual as in traditional scalar quantization ● Activity masking, the major benefit of PVQ, is not enabled yet – Encoding RDO is solely based on PSNR Mozilla Corporation 3 Traditional Architecture Input X residue Subtraction Transform T signal R predictor P + decoded X Inverse Inverse Scalar decoded R Transform Quantizer Quantizer Coefficient bitstream of Coder coded T(X) Mozilla Corporation 4 AV1 with PVQ Input X Transform T T(X) PVQ Quantizer PVQ Coefficient predictor P Transform T T(X) Coder PVQ Inverse Quantizer Inverse dequantized bitstream of decoded X Transform T(X) coded T(X) Mozilla Corporation 5 Coding Gain Change Metric AV1 --> AV1 with PVQ PSNR Y -0.17 PSNR-HVS 0.27 SSIM 0.93 MS-SSIM 0.14 CIEDE2000 -0.28 ● For the IETF test sequence set, "objective-1-fast". ● IETF and AOM for high latency encoding options are used. Mozilla Corporation 6 Speed ● Increase in total encoding time due to PVQ's search for best codepoint – PVQ's time complexity is close to O(n*n) for n coefficients, while scalar quantization has O(n) ● Compared to Daala, the search space for a RDO decision in AV1 is far larger – For the 1st frame of grandma_qcif (176x144) in intra frame mode, Daala calls PVQ 3843 times, while AV1 calls 632,520 times, that is ~165x.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Multi-Codec Support for OTT Services: HEVC/H.265 And/Or AV1?
    Efficient Multi-Codec Support for OTT Services: HEVC/H.265 and/or AV1? Christian Timmerer†,‡, Martin Smole‡, and Christopher Mueller‡ ‡Bitmovin Inc., †Alpen-Adria-Universität San Francisco, CA, USA and Klagenfurt, Austria, EU ‡{firstname.lastname}@bitmovin.com, †{firstname.lastname}@itec.aau.at Abstract – The success of HTTP adaptive streaming is un- multiple versions (e.g., different resolutions and bitrates) and disputed and technical standards begin to converge to com- each version is divided into predefined pieces of a few sec- mon formats reducing market fragmentation. However, other onds (typically 2-10s). A client first receives a manifest de- obstacles appear in form of multiple video codecs to be sup- scribing the available content on a server, and then, the client ported in the future, which calls for an efficient multi-codec requests pieces based on its context (e.g., observed available support for over-the-top services. In this paper, we review the bandwidth, buffer status, decoding capabilities). Thus, it is state of the art of HTTP adaptive streaming formats with re- able to adapt the media presentation in a dynamic, adaptive spect to new services and video codecs from a deployment way. perspective. Our findings reveal that multi-codec support is The existing different formats use slightly different ter- inevitable for a successful deployment of today's and future minology. Adopting DASH terminology, the versions are re- services and applications. ferred to as representations and pieces are called segments, which we will use henceforth. The major differences between INTRODUCTION these formats are shown in Table 1. We note a strong differ- entiation in the manifest format and it is expected that both Today's over-the-top (OTT) services account for more than MPEG's media presentation description (MPD) and HLS's 70 percent of the internet traffic and this number is expected playlist (m3u8) will coexist at least for some time.
    [Show full text]
  • LORE: a Loop Repository for the Evaluation of Compilers Zhi Chen∗, Zhangxiaowen Gong†, Justin Josef Szaday†, David C
    LORE: A Loop Repository for the Evaluation of Compilers Zhi Chen∗, Zhangxiaowen Gongy, Justin Josef Szadayy, David C. Wongz, David Padua y, Alexandru Nicolau ∗, Alexander V Veidenbaum ∗, Neftali Watkinson ∗, Zehra Sura x, Saeed Maleki{, Josep Torrellasy, Gerald DeJongy z Intel Corporation, x IBM Research, { Microsoft Research, ∗ University of California, Irvine, y University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Email: ∗fzhic2, nicolau, alexv, [email protected], [email protected], yfgong15, szaday2, padua, torrella, [email protected], [email protected], {[email protected] Abstract—Although numerous loop optimization techniques successive versions, and the effectiveness of solo/compound have been designed and deployed in commercial compilers in transformations. While some of such data can be found in the the past, virtually no common experimental infrastructure nor literature, in many cases compiler studies are confined to a repository exists to help the compiler community evaluate the effectiveness of these techniques. few codes, which are not always widely available. In addition, This paper describes a repository, LORE, that maintains a there is little in the area of historical data that shows how much large number of C language for loop nests extracted from popu- progress compiler technology has made in terms of delivering lar benchmarks, libraries, and real applications. It also describes performance. the infrastructure that builds and maintains the repository. Each In this paper, we propose LORE, a repository of program loop nest in the repository has been compiled, transformed, executed, and measured independently. These loops cover a segments, their semantically equivalent transformed versions, variety of properties that can be used by the compiler community and performance measurements with various compilers.
    [Show full text]
  • AV1 Status Update
    AV1 Status update Rostislav Pehlivanov [email protected] 2017-02-05 What is AV1 Interoperable and open Optimized for the Internet Scalable to any modern device at any bandwidth Designed with a low computational footprint and optimized for hardware Capable of consistent, highest-quality, real-time video delivery Flexible for both commercial and non-commercial content, including user-generated content What is AV1 (decoded) Royalty free Open development Lots of companies who deal with video on the internet involved Will see adaption Lots of members own patents we can use to make the codec better Avoiding alien IP means we have to work around patents and possibly discover better ways than the old tried and true techniques Reference encoder Reference encoder based on libvpx Without VP8 support With some bugfixes Every tool added initially as an experiment after passing review After passing IP review it gets enabled by default and becomes part of the codec * After codec bitstream gets frozen experiments that didn't make it get removed * ** * - Hasn't happened yet ** - Won't happen until the end of the year A codec is only as good as its coding tools Currently there are over 50 experiments: emulate hardware, clpf, dering, var tx, rect tx, ref mv, dual filter, convolve round, ext tx, tx64x64, sub8x8 mc, ext intra, intra interp, filter intra, ext inter, compound segment, ext refs, global motion, new quant, supertx, ans, ec multisymbol, loop restoration, ext partition, ext partition types, unpoison partition ctx, ext tile, motion var, ncobmc, warped
    [Show full text]