DOCSLIB.ORG

Full Report 'Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Full Report 'Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe' full report cultural heritage counts for europe This project is co-funded by the Culture Programme of the European Union The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the content that reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. This publication is supported by full report THE CHCFE CONSORTIUM ɞ Europa Nostra (The Voice of Cultural Heritage in Europe): steering committee: John Sell, Executive Vice-President; Piet Jaspaert, Board Member and Sneška Quaedvlieg-Mihailović, Secretary General project coordination: Louise van Rijckevorsel and Danaé Anastopoulos-Chaimowicz, Brussels Office ɞ ENCATC (The European Network on Cultural Management and Cultural Policy Education): steering committee: Prof. Dr. Claire Giraud-Labalte, Chair of the ENCATC Thematic Area Understanding Heritage and ENCATC Ambassador project coordination: GiannaLia Cogliandro Beyens, Secretary General project communication: Elizabeth Darley, Director of Communications ɞ Heritage Europe (The European Association of Historic Towns and Regions): steering committee: Brian Smith, Secretary General ɞ International Cultural Centre, Krakow (ICC): steering committee: Prof. Dr. Jacek Purchla, Director project researchers: Joanna Sanetra-Szeliga and Dr. Katarzyna Jagodzińska, Research Institute for European Heritage ɞ Raymond Lemaire International Centre for Conservation at KU Leuven (RLICC): steering committee: Prof. Dr. Koenraad Van Balen, Director This project is co-funded project researchers: Aziliz Vandesande, Clara Thys and Dr. Sigrid Van der Auwera by the Culture Programme of the European Union ɞ The Heritage Alliance, England (UK): steering committee: Kate Pugh, Chief Executive The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not THE CHCFE REPORT constitute an endorsement of research team the content that reflects the ICC, Krakow: Dr. Katarzyna Jagodzińska, Prof. Dr. Jacek Purchla and views only of the authors, Joanna Sanetra-Szeliga with Przemysław Niedźwiecki and Dr. Karolina Tylus and the Commission cannot RLICC, KU Leuven: Clara Thys, Aziliz Vandesande, Prof. Dr. Koenraad Van Balen be held responsi ble for any and Dr. Sigrid Van der Auwera with Prof. Dr. Luc Verpoest use which may be made editorial team of the information contained Prof. Dr. Claire Giraud-Labalte, on behalf of ENCATC therein. Kate Pugh, on behalf of The Heritage Alliance Sneška Quaedvlieg-Mihailović, on behalf of Europa Nostra Joanna Sanetra-Szeliga, on behalf of ICC, Krakow Brian Smith, on behalf of Heritage Europe Aziliz Vandesande, Clara Thys on behalf of RLICC, Leuven publication coordination Joanna Sanetra-Szeliga, on behalf of the CHCfE Consortium graphic design Radoszek Arts proofreading Justyna Jochym, Anastazja Oleśkiewicz technical editor Aleksandra Szczepan print Know-How Electronic version available at www.encatc.org/culturalheritagecountsforeurope Published on behalf of the CHCfE Consortium by the International Cultural Centre, Krakow June 2015 © Copyright CHCfE Consortium ISBN 978-83-63463-27-4 FOREWORD I am proud to introduce the Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe Report which demon strates the extraordinary power of our cultural heritage to improve the quality of our lives. In every corner of Europe, the wealth of heritage buildings and sites, historic neighbourhoods and cultural landscapes has the capacity to inspire Not everything and enrich us all and to help us foster and nurture a sense of belonging to a wider that counts community. can be counted, and not everything Cultural heritage is a capital of irreplaceable cultural, social, environmental and that can be counted economic value. This is true for Europe, as it is for the rest of the world. We know counts. this in our hearts and minds, but the policies and investments necessary to sustain our heritage have to be based on more than profound feelings or strong beliefs. attributed to We also need facts and figures to prove and illustrate those convictions. Articulat- Albert Einstein ing the value of our heritage by providing quantitative and qualitative evidence of its benefits and impacts, will indeed give more strength to the voice of cultural heritage in Europe. The thorough mapping and analysis of the Europe-wide evidence presented in this Report deepens and enhances our understanding, knowledge and awareness of the full potential of our cultural heritage as a key resource for sustainable development. This is essential to feed into local, regional, national and European decision making and thus provide a sound basis for effective policies for heritage. Such evidence, similarly, provides intelligible information for investors of all sorts — governments, commercial developers, private owners, philanthropists, civil society organisations — who need to compare options and make choices. The six partners of the CHCfE Consortium have done Europe a valuable service in demonstrating the economic, social, cultural and environmental impact of our cultural heritage. I commend the collective efforts and combined academic and policy expertise and commitment of all six partners of the CHCfE Consortium. The outcome of this project proves the added value of European cooperation between partners with diverse academic and life experiences from North, South, West, East and Central Europe. To end, special thanks go to the European Commission for their confidence and support to the Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe project. We welcome the recent unprecedented recognition by the European Union of cultural heritage as a strategic resource for a sustainable Europe. We believe that this Report will provide the EU Institutions and Member States an even more compelling narrative for further de- veloping and implementing a holistic approach to heritage impact assessment and also an integrated approach to policy making with regard to cultural heritage. On behalf of the CHCfE Consortium, Plácido Domingo, President of Europa Nostra titles link to the sections table of contents 57 2.5.1 Four pillar approach 62 2.5.2 Economic impact EXecutiVE SummARY 70 2.5.3 Social impact 8 & STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATIONS (by the Steering Committee with the 75 2.5.4 Cultural impact support of the Research Team) 78 2.5.5 Environmental impact The Case 9 Methodologies for impact 80 2.6 identification 13 The Evidence 80 2.6.1 The toolbox approach 19 The 10 Key Findings 81 2.6.2 Quantitative valuation 30 The 5 Strategic Recommendations methodologies 84 2.6.3 Qualitative methods for assessing REPORT socio-cultural values 32 (by the Research Team with the support of the Steering Committee) MESO LEVEL. CULTURAL HERITAGE 89 in the EuropeAN Union: 33 1 INTRODUCTION 3 economic, sociAL, cuLturAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 34 1.1 Background of the project What do we mean by 90 3.1 Introduction 35 1.2 cultural heritage? Evolution towards a more 36 1.3 Aims of the project 92 3.2 holistic approach 37 1.4 Structure of the report 92 3.2.1 The focus of the collected studies Previous initiatives The impact domains addressed 37 1.5 93 3.2.2 in the collected studies 38 1.6 Overview of the methodology 95 3.2.3 Economic impact domain MACRO LEVEL. CULTURAL 96 3.2.4 Social impact domain 45 2 heritAGE impAct: theorY 96 3.2.5 Cultural impact domain AND DISCOURSE ANALYSIS 97 3.2.6 Environmental impact domain 46 2.1 Introduction From the “four pillar approach” to 97 3.3 “holistic four domain approach” Cultural heritage — definition, 47 2.2 and policy/discourse shifts Methodologies employed 103 3.4 in European research on 52 2.3 Value versus impact cultural heritage impact 54 2.4 Adverse impacts 106 3.5 Scale of the studies 56 2.5 Towards a typology of impact 107 3.6 Respondent groups titles link to the sections Central and Western Europe — Meso level — Cultural heritage in 108 3.7 differences in approach to the 184 4.2 the EU: economic, social, cultural potential of cultural heritage and environmental impact Evidence from the field — input Observations concerning the 110 3.7.1 from Central European experts 184 4.2.1 impact of cultural heritage 112 3.7.2 Specificity of “Central Europe” Observations concerning the 188 4.2.2 research conducted at European level 116 3.7.3 Specificity of “Western Europe” Micro level — Cultural heritage impact assessment case studies 117 3.8 Overview of subdomains of impact 190 4.3 and analysis of the EU Prize based on the collected studies for Cultural Heritage/Europa Nostra Award laureates 117 3.8.1 Aesthetics of a place and image creation 191 4.4 Outcome of the research 128 3.8.2 Built heritage and the Raising awareness of the real estate market 191 4.4.1 impact of cultural heritage 136 3.8.3 Education, skills and knowledge Guide for regional and local 192 4.4.2 authorities on the holistic 144 3.8.4 Environmental sustainability approach towards cultural heritage impact assessment 148 3.8.5 Identity creation Cultural heritage as a contribution 193 4.4.3 to “Europe 2020 strategy” 152 3.8.6 Labour market 195 4.5 The way forward Regional attractiveness and 160 3.8.7 competitive advantage Innovative approaches 195 4.5.1 towards cultural heritage Return on investment, tax 164 3.8.8 income and GVA/GDP Preservation of heritage 198 4.5.2 and sustainability Social cohesion, continuity of social 168 3.8.9 life and community participation Need for more evidence- 198 4.5.3 ­‑based research and policy 174 3.9 Cultural heritage contributing to Europe 2020 strategy ANNEX. Micro LEVEL. Smart growth: developing 199 ImpAct Assessment in 174 3.9.1 an economy based on * knowledge and innovation PRACTICE: CASE STUDIES Sustainable growth: promoting Impact of immovable heritage in 176 3.9.2 a more resource efficient, greener 200 *1 the city of Mechelen, Belgium and more competitive economy Impact of museums in historic Inclusive growth: fostering a high- buildings in Poland: The case 177 3.9.3 -employment economy delivering 226 *2 of the Gallery of Polish 19th- social and territorial cohesion -Century Art in Krakow and the ms2 (Muzeum Sztuki) in Łódź 181 CONCLUSIONS Laureates of the EU Prize for Cultural 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human Capital in the Aftermath of the Partitions of Poland Andreas Ba
    European Historical Economics Society EHES Working Paper | No. 150 | March 2019 Fading Legacies: Human Capital in the Aftermath of the Partitions of Poland Andreas Backhaus, Centre for European Policy Studies EHES Working Paper | No. 150 | March 2019 Fading Legacies: Human Capital in the Aftermath of the Partitions of Poland* Andreas Backhaus†, Centre for European Policy Studies Abstract This paper studies the longevity of historical legacies in the context of the formation of human capital. The Partitions of Poland (1772-1918) represent a natural experiment that instilled Poland with three different legacies of education, resulting in sharp differences in human capital among the Polish population. I construct a large, unique dataset that reflects the state of schooling and human capital in the partition territories from 1911 to 1961. Using a spatial regression discontinuity design, I find that primary school enrollment differs by as much as 80 percentage points between the partitions before WWI. However, this legacy disappears within the following two decades of Polish independence, as all former partitions achieve universal enrollment. Differences in educational infrastructure and gender access to schooling simultaneously disappear after WWI. The level of literacy converges likewise across the former partitions, driven by a high intergenerational mobility in education. After WWII, the former partitions are not distinguishable from each other in terms of education anymore. JEL Codes: N34, I20, O15, H75 Keywords: Poland, Human Capital, Education, Persistence * Research for this paper was conducted while the author was a Ph.D. candidate at LMU Munich. The author would like to thank Philipp Ager, Lukas Buchheim, Matteo Cervellati, Jeremiah Dittmar, Erik Hornung, Chris Muris, Christian Ochsner, Uwe Sunde, Ludger Wößmann, Nikolaus Wolf, and audiences at the University of Southern Denmark, the University of Bayreuth, UCLouvain, the FRESH Meeting 2018, the WEast Workshop 2018, and WIEM 2018 for their comments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Impact of the ICOMOS Activity and Statutes As a Contributor to the Public Governance of the World Heritage Protection
    Yurinets J.L. ♦ The Role and Impact of the ICOMOS Activity and Statutes as a Contributor to the Public Governance of the World Heritage Protection Abstract: It is considered a role and impact of the activity and statutes of the International Council of Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS). It is given the proofs that for the States Parties to the UNESCO Convention Concerning the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage - it is possible to exactly comply with their international commitments, observing ICOMOS regulations. It is illustrated that ICOMOS activity can be considered as an integral part of the Good Governance, executed together with official institutions (state authorities) and non-governmental actors (business, community). The administrative and legal nature of the ICOMOS documents is analyzed. Keywords: UNESCO; ICOMOS; cultural heritage; natural heritage; Convention Concerning the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage; public governance; ICOMOS statute; Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. The preservation of cultural heritage and finding solutions to global environmental problems are basics of human civilization’s life and development. Historically, the protection of cultural heritage was a state’s domestic jurisdiction. The international community acknowledgement of the utmost importance of these aspects is giving rise to the international legal regulation of the cultural objects protection and environment preservation [12, p. 1]. The report [13] mentioned the fact that at the end of XXth century the international law contained more than 100 international statutes, regulating the discovery, preservation, protection, study and promotion of cultural property.The system of these statutes is so extensive, that it _______________________ ♦ Yurinets Julia Leonidovna – PhD in Law, Associate Professor of Constitutional and Administrative Law Department of the Legal Institute of the National Aviation University, Kyiv (Ukraine).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Ethics Today: Are Our Conservation-Restoration Theories and Practice Ready for the Twenty-First Century? Introductory Notes to Some Central Issues
    Protection of cultural heritage 8 (2019) 10.35784/odk.1099 CONSERVATION ETHICS TODAY: ARE OUR CONSERVATION-RESTORATION THEORIES AND PRACTICE READY FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY? INTRODUCTORY NOTES TO SOME CENTRAL ISSUES SCHÄDLER-SAUB Ursula 1 1 Graduated in Conservation-Restoration, PhD in Art History, Speaker of the National Scientific Committee on Conservation-Restoration, ICOMOS Germany, Professor for History and Theory of Conservation-Restoration and Art History at the Faculty of Architecture, Engineering and Conservation, HAWK University of Applied Sciences and Arts in Hildesheim (Germany); [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8072-8485 The present publication in the journal series “Protection of cultural heritage” of ICOMOS Poland and the Technical University of Lublin is the result of an interdisciplinary exchange and cooperation between three international and national scientific committees of ICOMOS (the ISC Theory and Philosophy of Conservation-Restoration, the ISC Stone, and the German NSC Conservation-Restoration of Wall Paintings and Architectural Surfaces), renowned institutions of conservation-restoration and history of art, as well as institutions of education and professional representation in this field (the National Italian Conservation Institute Opificio delle Pietre Dure OPD in Florence, the Kunsthistorisches Institut, Max-Planck-Institut in Florence, the European Confederation of Conservator-Restorers’ Organisation E.C.C.O., the European Network of Conservation-Restoration Education ENCoRE, the Italian and German Professional Associations of Conservator-Restorers (A.R.I. Associazione Restauratori d’Italia and VDR Verband der Restauratoren). It is based on an international ICOMOS conference held in Florence in March 2018, supported by the Fondazione Romualdo Del Bianco and its international institute Life Beyond Tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Venice Charter 1964)
    The Venice Charter (1964) La Charte de Venise (1964) A bibliography Une bibliographie By UNESCO-ICOMOS Documenta on Centre - February 2012 Par le Centre de Documenta on UNESCO-ICOMOS - Février 2012 Prepared and edited by UNESCO-ICOMOS Documentation Centre. UNESCO-ICOMOS Documentation Centre. Préparé et édité par le Centre de Documentation UNESCO-ICOMOS. Centre de Documentation UNESCO-ICOMOS. © UNESCO-ICOMOS Documentation Centre, February 2012. ICOMOS - International Council on Monuments and sites / Conseil International des Monuments et des Sites 49-51 rue de la Fédération 75015 Paris FRANCE http://www.international.icomos.org UNESCO-ICOMOS Documentation Centre / Centre de Documentation UNESCO-ICOMOS : http://www.international.icomos.org/centre_documentation/index.html Cover photographs: Photos de couverture : First Page of the original manuscript of the Venice Charter (Cover of ICOMOS Scientific Journal “The Venice Charter 164-1994”, Paris 1994) Venice ©J. Barlet Content / Sommaire International Charter For The Conservation And Restoration Of Monuments And Sites (The Venice Charter 1964) ..... 3 Definitions ............................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Article 1. ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Article 2. ...............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Poland Historical Geography Handout
    Poland Historical Geography: Polish History through Maps and Gazetteers Daniel R. Jones, MS, AG® FamilySearch HISTORY OF POLAND Polish Commonwealth, 1600s-1795 Instead of a hereditary monarchy, they elected their own king. Because the king was elected, this allowed foreign powers to manipulate the elections for candidates, and to create turmoil for their own gain. The commonwealth was in a state of decline because of wars, political turmoil, and aristocratic rebellions. Although reforms were attempted, Poland’s neighbors saw opportunities for themselves. Partitions of Poland, 1772-1795 First partition, 1772: Rebellion occurred in 1768, bringing Poland into a civil war. Austria, Prussia, and Russia collectively decided to annex pieces of Poland for themselves during the war. Second partition, 1792: Poland institutes a constitution in 1791. This angered Russia, who encouraged another rebellion against the Polish king. Russia provided military support to the rebellion. After a few months, Russia and Prussia slice off large sections of Poland. Third partition, 1795: Some nobles were angry at their king for surrendering to Russia during the second partition, and created another uprising. Russia invaded again to crush the uprising. Russia, Austria, and Prussia decided to split the rest of Poland between themselves, and Poland disappeared off the map. Kingdom of Poland, 1815-1914 The French created the Duchy of Warsaw during the Napoleonic Wars as a semi-independent country. After the war, the Kingdom of Poland was established, but was joined to the Russian Empire; they were allowed their own constitution and military. After several uprisings, the Polish language and culture were suppressed, the kingdom was more integrated into the Russian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Vs. Economic Legacies of Empires: Evidence from the Partition of Poland I
    Motivation and Background Contributions Discussion and Conclusion Cultural vs. Economic Legacies of Empires: Evidence from the Partition of Poland I. Grosfeld and E. Zhuravakaya Luke Zinnen, Presenter EC 765, Spring 2018 Luke Zinnen, Presenter Cultural vs. Economic Legacies of Empires Motivation and Background Contributions Discussion and Conclusion Outline 1 Motivation and Background 2 Contributions Empirical Strategy Results 3 Discussion and Conclusion Luke Zinnen, Presenter Cultural vs. Economic Legacies of Empires Motivation and Background Contributions Discussion and Conclusion Economic and Political Persistence of Historical Events Major and growing literature on connection between historical events and current political and economic outcomes Slavery Imperialism Unclear what carries through intervening time Economic factors Cultural Institutional Likewise, mechanisms important: which are overriden by later shocks, policy? Luke Zinnen, Presenter Cultural vs. Economic Legacies of Empires Motivation and Background Contributions Discussion and Conclusion Goals and Outcomes of the Paper Use 1815 - 1918 partition of Poland between Russia, Prussia/Germany, and Austria/Austria-Hungary as clean case to examine persistent and attenuated factors Homogenous before and after partition Partition arbitrary and with sharp borders Large dierences between absorbing empires Employ spacial regression discontinuity analysis on localities near empire borders during partition Find little persistent dierence in most economic outcomes (exception: railroad infrastructure), more for religiosity and democratic capital Latter have observable eect on liberal/religious conservative voting patterns Luke Zinnen, Presenter Cultural vs. Economic Legacies of Empires Motivation and Background Contributions Discussion and Conclusion Related Literature Persistence of culture and institutions, and their long-term eects on development Colonial rule and post-independence institutions: (Acemoglu et al.
    [Show full text]
  • How History Matters for Student Performance. Lessons from the Partitions of Poland Ú Job Market Paper Latest Version: HERE
    How History Matters for Student Performance. Lessons from the Partitions of Poland ú Job Market Paper Latest Version: HERE. Pawe≥Bukowski † This paper examines the effect on current student performance of the 19th century Partitions of Poland among Austria, Prussia and Russia. Despite the modern similarities of the three regions, using a regression discontinuity design I show that student test scores are 0.6 standard deviation higher on the Austrian side of the former Austrian-Russian border. This magnitude is comparable to the black vs. white test score gap in the US. On the other hand, I do not find evidence for differences on the Prussian-Russian border. Using a theoretical model and indirect evidence I argue that the Partitions have persisted through their impact on social norms toward local schools. Nevertheless, the persistent effect of Austria is puzzling given the histori- cal similarities of the Austrian and Prussian educational systems. I argue that the differential legacy of Austria and Prussia originates from the Aus- trian Empire’s policy to promote Polish identity in schools and the Prussian Empire’s efforts to Germanize the Poles through education. JEL Classification: N30, I20, O15, J24 úI thank Sascha O. Becker, Volha Charnysh, Gregory Clark, Tomas Cvrcek, John S. Earle, Irena Grosfeld, Hedvig Horvát, Gábor Kézdi, Jacek Kochanowicz, Attila Lindner, Christina Romer, Ruth M. Schüler, Tamás Vonyó, Jacob Weisdorf, Agnieszka WysokiÒska, Noam Yuchtman, the partici- pants of seminars at Central European University, University of California at Berkeley, University of California at Davis, Warsaw School of Economics, Ifo Center for the Economics of Education and FRESH workshops in Warsaw and Canterbury, WEast workshop in Belgrade, European Historical Economics Society Summer School in Berlin for their comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish National Identity Under Russian, Prussian, and Austro
    Three Paths to One State: Polish National Identity under Russian, Prussian, and Austro- Hungarian Occupation after 1863 Research Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with research distinction in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Adam Wanter The Ohio State University June 2012 Project Advisor: Professor Jessie Labov, Department of Slavic and East European Languages and Cultures 2 Table of Contents: Introduction 1 Section One: Background 7 Section Two: Composition 15 Section Three: Imperial History 22 Section Four: Political Ideologies and Political Figures 37 Conclusion 50 Bibliography 54 i Illustrations: Figure 1, map of Russian Poland 8 Figure 2, map of Austrian Poland 10 Figure 3, map of Prussian Poland 11 ii Introduction After over 100 years of foreign occupation by three different powers, a common Polish national identity was able to emerge and unite the three partitioned areas. How was this possible? What conditions existed that were able to bring together three separate and distinct areas together? This thesis will look into the development of Polish national identity in the three partitioned areas of Poland during the late 19th and early 20th centuries and in particular the role that imperial policy played in its formation. The purpose of this thesis is to carry out a comparative study of the three partitioned areas of Poland between roughly 1863 and the outbreak of World War I. Specifically, the thesis compares the effects of the three Imperial powers on the economic landscape of each region, as well as the environment in which Polish political thought, specifically different forms of Polish nationalism, emerged, analyzing how that environment help contribute to its development.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions of Authenticity JUKKA JOKILEHTO
    Questions of authenticity JUKKA JOKILEHTO Abstract: This paper focuses on the evolution of the concept of authenticity in the context of heritage conservation. It ana- lyzes the initial conception in the Venice Charter, and the changes it underwent following the discussions held at Bergen and Nara in 1994. It also explores additional changes, taking into consideration social aspects, as well as broader environmental perspectives. Through the analysis of examples, international principles and criteria are shown as a valuable reference and methodological framework to approach specific heritage sites, taking into consideration their local context. Keywords: Authenticity, diversity, Nara, reconstruction. The notion of “authenticity” is sometimes simply interpreted as being true. However, the issue is more complex than that. Even the word “true” can have different connotations in the diverse world regions. The word “authentic” has its origins in the ancient Greek and Latin languages, which implies a Mediterranean cultural context. However, since then it has acquired a complex set of references. There are two levels of thought, one is the local level, based on social and cultural traditions. The other is the international context, which proposes to recognize the commonality of human values and consequently the possibility to develop an international policy framework for the treatment of inheritance, as has been stated in the Venice Charter. The recognition of a common heritage of humanity can be seen as a positive outcome of the tragedies caused by two world wars in the 20th century. At the same time, the Preface of the Venice Charter also anticipates the need to recognize the diversity of cultures and traditions and the encouragement of: “each country being responsible for applying the plan within the framework of its own culture and traditions.” Therefore, while the international guidelines provide the framework, the verification of authenticity will necessarily be made in reference to the heritage resource concerned, taking into account its context.
    [Show full text]
  • From Success in the Past to Hope in the Future Newsletter
    2019 Newsletter From success in the past to hope in the future A celebration of 25 years PACK mission statement: to ensure thorough intellectual and emotional growth Newsletter 2019 - Jubilee 25 years 1 Table of contents 25 years of achievement School gallery Jubilee / History of Private Academic Centre of Education Schools / A Being Selfless Pays - The Golden Karmel Award Short History of the PACK / School Olympiad Champions / The IB Diploma Programme in Our School / Prywatne Gimnazjum Akademickie nr 6 im. Highlighting what makes our schools unique Fryderyka Chopina / Academic Tutoring as a Form of Educational Work / CAS / Debate / IMAGINATION DESTINATION / UNESCO World Around Intercultural Schools International exchanges Congratulatory Notes from Around the World Infonographic / Global Awarness and international mindedness in IB US GENERAL CONSULATE KRAKOW / Delhi Public School, Indie / Nepal / education / India / Anglo-Polish exchange / Polish-German / Kościuszko Pompano Beach, USA Program 2019 / Student about exchanges In PACK schools we trust International Baccalaureate Programme at a glance Beata Fortecka - parent / Allyson Daly, USA / Our Little IBDP community / Business Management / Psychology / TOK / Visual Arts / SPORT Successes Traditional School vs. VIIIPALO Newsletter 2019 - Jubilee 25 years Edited by Newsletter Translation Help Newsletter Title Anna Krzemińska-Kaczyńska Żaneta Dyląg Paul Minshull Joanna Pillans Jolanta Jedzok Joanna Pillans IT support, cover design Proofreading Bartek Suchocki Jakub Jastrzębski Joanna Pillans
    [Show full text]
  • Do We Need a New Florence Charter? the Importance Of
    sustainability Article Do We Need a New Florence Charter? The Importance of Authenticity for the Maintenance of Historic Gardens and Other Historic Greenery Layouts in the Context of Source Research (Past) and Taking into Account the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Idea (Future) Marzanna Jagiełło Department of Architecture Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Landscape, Faculty of Architecture Wrocław, University of Science and Technology, 50-317 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] Abstract: This year, 40 years have passed since the adoption of the basic document for the protection of historic gardens, i.e., the Florence Charter. During this time, its recommendations have been verified by both conservation and researchers’ actions, who in various environments discussed its meaning as well as its essential shortcomings. Some of the provisions of the Charter were criticized in the context of the effects of their use, especially those relating to the issue of historic gardens fundamental protection, namely to authenticity in its various scopes with particular emphasis on the use of source research which raises many reservations for conservation actions. Moreover, Citation: Jagiełło, M. Do We Need a their excessively superficial interpretation, which was demonstrated by the example of the most New Florence Charter? The popular plant used in regular gardens, namely boxwood. This article presents and analyzes the Importance of Authenticity for the Maintenance of Historic Gardens and most important theses of these discussions and the main axes of the dispute, dividing them into Other Historic Greenery Layouts in two parts, i.e., the first relating to authenticity and the other to the use of sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Ściągnij Pdf (Maj-Czerwiec 2013)
    ISSN 1644-4183 MAJ/CZERWIEC/(31) 2013 MAY/JUNE (31) 2013 Słuupskpsk DLA OBIEŻYŚWIATÓW / FOR GLOBETROTTERS HHavanaavana DLA SERCA / FOR HEART GAZETA POKŁADOWA WWW.PKSPOLONUS.PL Niemcy RODZINNA PRZYGODA / GERMANY – A FAMILY ADVENTUREADVEENTURE www.magazynswiat.plw w.w m 11-15.indd-15.indd 1 113-08-063-08-06 110:140:14 www.platinumpalace.pl 11-15.indd-15.indd 2-32-3 113-08-063-08-06 110:140:14 4 edytorial Wyjątkowo długa zima, która w tym roku opuściła nas dopiero w kwietniu, sprawi- ła, że spragnieni jesteśmy słońca i ciepłe- go morza. Znakomitym miejscem na urlop This year’s exceptionally long winter lasted może być zatem Egipt. Czekają tu na nas until April. Now, we anticipate a great summer of sunbathing and swimming in piękne, rozległe plaże i to nad dwoma mo- the warm sea. Egypt is the perfect location rzami do wyboru – Śródziemnym i Czerwo- for holidays, with its delicious food, color- nym, fantastyczne warunki do nurkowania ful reef and beautiful broad beaches at two i windsurfingu, a także świetna kuchnia. seas of your choice – the Mediterranean A do tego jeszcze na własne możemy zo- Sea and the Red Sea. The whole bay gives baczyć Sfinksa i piramidy czy zgromadzone rise to fantastic diving and windsurfing w Luksorze skarby faraonów. conditions. Egypt offers also a unique flair Ci, którzy chcieliby się wybrać w znacznie of history such as visiting the Sphinx and rzadziej uczęszczane przez turystów miej- the Pyramids or admiring the pharaoh’s sca, a z równie cennymi zabytkami, powin- treasures in Luxor. ni pomyśleć o Uzbekistanie.
    [Show full text]