DOCSLIB.ORG

The Emergence and Development of Disability Hate Crime Policy and Practice in England and Wales

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Emergence and Development of Disability Hate Crime Policy and Practice in England and Wales The emergence and development of Disability Hate Crime policy and practice in England and Wales A case of an unsettled and unsettling policy agenda Seamus Taylor A Thesis submitted in partial requirement for the degree of PhD in Applied Social Science (Law) School of Law Lancaster University 2018 1 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Declaration .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 1.2 Origins and development of my research interest ..................................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Locating this research study’s focus within the hate crime legal framework and legal policy domain in England and Wales............................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 1.4 Overall Aim and Research Objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 16 1.4.1 Research Objectives .......................................................................................................................................................... 16 1.5 Research Questions ................................................................................................................................................................ 16 1.6 Chapter Overviews ................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 2: From Hate Crime to Disability Hate Crime ..................................................................................................................... 19 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................ 19 2.2 Wider context ............................................................................................................................................................................. 19 2.3 Conceiving and Defining Hate Crime ......................................................................................................................................... 21 2.4 Origins of the phenomenon of Hate Crime ................................................................................................................................ 21 2.4.1 Significance of post-World War II rights settlement ........................................................................................................... 22 2.4.2 Emergence of contemporary concern with hate crime ....................................................................................................... 22 2.5 Writing Hate Crime ..................................................................................................................................................................... 23 2.6 Identity Politics and Disability Hate Crime ................................................................................................................................. 24 2.7 Disability, Societal, and Public Policy Responses ..................................................................................................................... 26 2.8 How Public Policy (including Criminal Justice Policy) constructs Disability and Disabled People ............................................. 29 2.9 Competing ideologies and problematisations of Disability in Public Policy - Care versus Rights .............................................. 30 2.10 Constructing Disabled People as Vulnerable ........................................................................................................................... 31 2.11 Policy Making and Developments on Hate Crime and on Equality including Disability Hate Crime ........................................ 33 2.11.1 Policy Making on Hate Crime ........................................................................................................................................... 33 2.12 Policy making on equality in England and Wales and issues raised for hate crime ................................................................ 35 2.12.1 Catalytic influence of the Lawrence Inquiry ...................................................................................................................... 35 2.12.2 The equality duties approach to advancing equality ........................................................................................................ 35 2.12.3 Hate Crime, street level bureaucracy and the exercise of discretion ............................................................................... 36 2.12.4 Policy contributions by Independent Bodies, the Community Sector, and others to the Disability Hate Crime Agenda .. 37 2.13 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Chapter 3: Research Design, Methodology and towards Research Methods .............................................................................. 41 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................ 41 3.2 Research Design ....................................................................................................................................................................... 41 3.2.1 Types of Case Study – Holistic Case Study with an extended unit of analysis .................................................................. 42 3.2.2 Boundaries of this Case Study ........................................................................................................................................... 42 3.3 Grounded Theory Approach ...................................................................................................................................................... 43 3.4 Tentative Organising and Analytical Framework ....................................................................................................................... 45 3.5 From Research Design and Methodology and towards Research Methods .............................................................................. 48 3.5.1 Research Method 1 - Key Informant Interviews – semi-structured ........................................................................... 49 3.5.2 Research Method 2 - Documentary Analysis and Links to Literature Review ....................................................... 51 3.5.3 Research Method 3 - Analysis of Individual Cases of Disability Hate Crime ..................................................................... 52 3.6 Researcher Issues – Professional and Personal ....................................................................................................................... 57 3.7 Ethical Issues ............................................................................................................................................................................. 58 2 3.8 Addressing Validity, Reliability, and Trustworthiness in the Case Study ................................................................................... 59 Chapter 4: Agenda Triggering ........................................................................................................................................................... 60 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................ 60 4.2 Targeted Harassment and Hostility towards Disabled People – some background .................................................................. 60 4.2.1 Significant triggering role played by Values into Action NGO ............................................................................................ 60 4.3 Early Activism and Problematisation .......................................................................................................................................... 61 4.3.1 Values into Action NGO- first to use the language of Disability Hate Crime ...................................................................... 63 4.3.2 Early role of South London NGO and activists ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Definitions of Oppression, Dehumanization and Exploitation
    Definitions of Oppression, Dehumanization and Exploitation Oppression The dictionary definition ((Webster's Third International Dictionary): "Unjust or cruel exercise of authority or power especially by the imposition of burdens; the condition of being weighed down; an act of pressing down; a sense of heaviness or obstruction in the body or mind." The Latin origin has oppressus as the past participle of opprimere, or to press down. Amongst the synonyms: the word subjugation. The Social Work Dictionary, ed. Robert L. Barker defines oppression as: "The social act of placing severe restrictions on an individual, group or institution. Typically, a government or political organization that is in power places these restrictions formally or covertly on oppressed groups so that they may be exploited and less able to compete with other social groups. The oppressed individual or group is devalued, exploited and deprived of privileges by the individual or group which has more power." (Barker, 2003) The Blackwell Dictionary of Sociology has an excellent definition of social oppression: "Social oppression is a concept that describes a relationship between groups or categories of between groups or categories of people in which a dominant group benefits from the systematic abuse, exploitation, and injustice directed toward a subordinate group. The relationship between whites and blacks in the United States and South Africa, between social classes in many industrial societies, between men and women in most societies, between Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland - all have elements of social oppression in that the organization of social life enables those who dominate to oppress others. Relationships between groups and relationships between groups and social categories, it should not be confused with the oppressive behavior of individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Pretrial Detention and Torture: Why Pretrial Detainees Face the Greatest Risk
    Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Human Rights Human Rights Implementation Centre OPEN SOCIETY JUSTICE INITIATIVE Pretrial Detention and Torture: Why Pretrial Detainees Face the Greatest Risk A Global Campaign for Pretrial Justice Report Pretrial Detention and Torture: Why Pretrial Detainees Face the Greatest Risk Pretrial Detention and Torture: Why Pretrial Detainees Face the Greatest Risk Human Rights Implementation Centre Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Human Rights Copyright © 2011 Open Society Foundations. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission of the publisher. ISBN: 978-1-936133-45-1 Published by Open Society Foundations 400 West 59th Street New York, NY 10019 USA www.soros.org For more information contact: Martin Schönteich Senior Legal Officer National Criminal Justice Reform Open Society Justice Initiative [email protected] Cover designed by Judit Kovács l Createch Ltd. Text layout and printing by Createch Ltd. Cover photo © Brennan Linsley l AP Photo About the Global Campaign for Pretrial Justice Excessive and arbitrary pretrial detention1 is an overlooked form of human rights abuse that affects millions of persons each year, causing and deepening poverty, stunting economic development, spreading disease, and undermining the rule of law. Pretrial detainees may lose their jobs and homes; contract and spread disease; be asked to pay bribes to secure release or better conditions of detention; and suffer physical and psy- chological damage that last long after their detention ends. In view of the magnitude of this worldwide problem, the Open Society Justice Initiative, together with other part- ners, is engaging in a Global Campaign for Pretrial Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of Hate Crime Legislation
    A Comparative Analysis of Hate Crime Legislation A Report to the Hate Crime Legislation Review James Chalmers and Fiona Leverick University of Glasgow, July 2017 i A Comparative Analysis of Hate Crime Legislation: A Report to the Hate Crime Legislation Review July 2017 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ________________________________________________ 1 1. WHAT IS HATE CRIME? ________________________________________ 4 2. HATE CRIME LEGISLATION IN SCOTLAND __________________________ 7 3. JUSTIFICATIONS FOR PUNISHING HATE CRIME MORE SEVERELY ______ 23 4. MODELS OF HATE CRIME LEGISLATION __________________________ 40 5. CHOICE OF PROTECTED CHARACTERISTICS _______________________ 52 6. HATE SPEECH AND STIRRING UP OFFENCES _______________________ 68 7. HATE CRIME LEGISLATION IN SELECTED JURISDICTIONS _____________ 89 8. APPROACHES TAKEN IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS RELEVANT TO THE OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOUR AT FOOTBALL AND THREATENING COMMUNICATIONS (SCOTLAND) ACT 2012 ____________________________________________________ 134 ii INTRODUCTION In January 2017, the Scottish Government announced a review of hate crime legislation, chaired by Lord Bracadale.1 Lord Bracadale requested that, to assist the Review it its task, we produce a comparative report detailing principles underpinning hate crime legislation and approaches taken to hate crime in a range of jurisdictions. Work on this report commenced in late March 2017 and the final report was submitted to the Review in July 2017. Chapter 1 (What is Hate Crime?) explores what is meant by the term “hate crime”, noting that different definitions may properly be used for different purposes. It notes that the legislative response to hate crime can be characterised by the definition offered by Chakraborti and Garland: the creation of offences, or sentencing provisions, “which adhere to the principle that crimes motivated by hatred or prejudice towards particular features of the victim’s identity should be treated differently from ‘ordinary’ crimes”.
    [Show full text]
  • Disability Studies 1
    Disability Studies 1 DST:1101 Introduction to Disability Studies 3 s.h. Introduction and overview of important topics and discussions Disability Studies that pertain to the experience of being disabled; contrast between medical and social models of disability; focus on Chair, Department of Health and Human how disability has been constructed historically, socially, and Physiology politically in an effort to distinguish myth and stigma from • Warren G. Darling reality; perspective that disability is part of human experience and touches everyone; interdisciplinary with many academic Coordinator, Disability Studies areas that offer narratives about experience of disability. GE: • Kristina M. Gordon (Health and Human Physiology) Diversity and Inclusion. DST:1200 Disabilities and Inclusion in Writing and Film Undergraduate certificate: disability studies Around the World 3 s.h. Website: https://clas.uiowa.edu/hhp/undergraduate/ Exploration of human experiences of dis/ability and exclusion/ disability-studies-certificate inclusion. Taught in English. GE: Diversity and Inclusion. Same Disability studies examines disability as a social, cultural, as GHS:1200, GRMN:1200, WLLC:1200. historical, and political phenomenon rather than focusing DST:3102 Culture and Community in Human on its clinical, medical, or therapeutic aspects. It is an Services 2-3 s.h. interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary field that draws on Influence of social issues (e.g., diversity, equity) on human scholarship from diverse disciplines, including anthropology, services;
    [Show full text]
  • JUSTICE for TORTURE WORLDWIDE Law, Practice and Agendas for Change
    JUSTICE FOR TORTURE WORLDWIDE Law, Practice and Agendas for Change October 2013 ii | REDRESS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. LAW AND PRACTICE ON TORTURE FROM A CROSS-REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE .................................................... 4 2.1. The context of torture ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.2. Victims of torture and ill-treatment .................................................................................................... 5 2.1.3. Perpetrators of torture and ill-treatment .......................................................................................... 10 2.1.4. Methods of torture and ill-treatment ................................................................................................ 14 2.1.5. Causes of torture and ill-treatment ................................................................................................... 18 2.1.6. Social and cultural dimensions ........................................................................................................... 21 2.2. Torture and ill-treatment in situations of heightened tension .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Policy Forum (NPF) Report 2018
    REPORT 2018 @LabPolicyForum #NPFConsultation2018 National Policy Forum Report 2018 XX National Policy Forum Report 2018 Contents NPF Elected Officers ....................................................................................................................4 Foreword ........................................................................................................................................5 About this document ...................................................................................................................6 Policy Commission Annual Reports Early Years, Education and Skills ............................................................................................7 Economy, Business and Trade ............................................................................................. 25 Environment, Energy and Culture ....................................................................................... 39 Health and Social Care ........................................................................................................... 55 Housing, Local Government and Transport ..................................................................... 71 International ............................................................................................................................. 83 Justice and Home Affairs ....................................................................................................... 99 Work, Pensions and Equality ..............................................................................................119
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Documents 17685 Presidential Documents
    Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 6, 2021 / Presidential Documents 17685 Presidential Documents Proclamation 10170 of March 31, 2021 National Sexual Assault Prevention and Awareness Month, 2021 By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation Sexual assault, at its core, is a devastating abuse of power—one that affects people of every age, race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, national origin, socioeconomic background, and religion. It is the responsibility of each of us to stand up and speak out against it, not only to improve the laws and services available to survivors, but also to change the culture and attitudes that allow sexual assault to proliferate. Together, we must work toward a society that upholds every person’s right to live free from sexual violence—where our institutions and communities commit to pre- venting sexual assault and sexual harassment, supporting survivors, and holding offenders accountable. The pandemic has exacerbated the already harrowing challenges facing sexual assault survivors by making it more difficult or risky for them to seek help. Victims may be reluctant to go to the hospital for a medical forensic exam because of the risk of COVID–19 exposure; rape crisis centers and other social service providers have struggled to maintain their services while adopting necessary public health protocols; and survivors are often isolated from loved ones, friends, or co-workers who might be in the best position to provide support. As we race to stop the spread of this devastating virus, we must strengthen our efforts to support sexual assault survivors whose suffering may be compounded by this pandemic, as well as by the economic crisis that has further undermined their economic security and taken a toll on service providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ableism [ Ey-Buh-Liz-Uhm ]
    ableism [ ey-buh-liz-uhm ] noun 1 discrimination against disabled people: laws to prevent ableism, racism, and sexism in the workplace. 2 the tendency to regard people with a disability as incomplete, diminished, or damaged, and to measure the quality of life with a disability against a non-disabled standard: Ableism reinforces the idea that disability is a personal tragedy. Think about it like this: Racism Sexism Ableism What does ableism look like? Some examples: Institutional (Noticeable Ableism) Public buildings without These are the types of things you may already be ramps or elevators aware of because this kind of ableism is often built Refusing reasonable into how our communities are structured. accommodations Institutional ableism can be found in areas such as Inaccessible playgrounds policy, education, employment, and social norms. Wage gaps Lack of representation in Social (Subtle Ableism) the media These types of behaviors may take longer to see Calling people with because people do them without thinking. This form disabilities an inspiration of ableism takes awareness and practice to change, just for being disabled but once you get it, your inclusive behaviors and Slow/baby talk actions will be second nature to you! Unsolicited touch Is ableism really an issue? What can you do? Yes, it is. Ableism is the root of disability inequality. Talk to the experts! People with disabilities It limits access to important things in people’s lives are the best resource to learn about how to like education, employment, healthcare, and voting. treat people with disabilities and what you It also causes people with disabilities to be socially can do to help advocate for change.
    [Show full text]
  • The (Narrative) Prosthesis Re-Fitted Finding New Support for Embodied and Imagined Differences in Contemporary Art
    The (Narrative) Prosthesis Re-Fitted Finding New Support for Embodied and Imagined Differences in Contemporary Art Amanda Cachia Independent scholar and PhD candidate The (Narrative) Prosthesis Re-Fitted This article undertakes analyses of the contemporary American artists Robert Gober and Cindy Sherman to argue that they use the tropes of the obscene, abject, and traumatic—as discussed by Hal Foster—to make literal and metaphorical reference to David T. Mitchell and Sharon L. Snyder’s narrative prosthesis and its “truth,” while simultaneously leaving out the lived experience of disability. Consideration is given to the works of artists Carmen Papalia and Mike Parr, who use complex embodiment as a new methodology to signify empowerment and agency over what we might previously have considered the obscene, abject, or traumatic. They transform traditional understandings of the “prosthetic” within the specific rhetoric of disability. Introduction Why is it so de rigueur for contemporary artists to use disabled embodiment as a means to convey troubled emotional states, as a narrative and literal prosthesis? Narrative prosthesis is a term originally developed by David T. Mitchell and Sharon L. Snyder, where the disabled body is often inserted into literary, or in this case, visual narratives as a metaphorical opportunity. The disabled body or character is used as a type of crutch or supporting device that allows the narrative to take a turn or a new direction, but often the relationship between the story itself and the disabled body is one based on exploi- tation. “Through the corporeal metaphor,” Mitchell and Snyder articulate, “the disabled or otherwise different body may easily become a stand-in for more abstract notions of the human condition, as universal or nationally specific; thus the textual (disembodied) project depends upon—and takes advantage of—the materiality of the body” (50).
    [Show full text]
  • Still Getting Away with Murder: Disability Hate Crime in England
    Still Getting Away with Murder A report about Disability Hate Crime in England Disability hate crime: this means when somebody commits a crime against a Disabled person because of their impairment. Impairment: in the document, this is used to talk about a Disabled person’s medical condition, diagnosis or difference. This could be physical or mental. Not all Disabled people are comfortable with the word ‘impairment’. However, we are not using this word to talk about who the person is. That is a personal choice. Part A – A Summary of the report One out of five Disabled people say that they have faced unkind or threatening behaviour or even been attacked (Inclusion London, 2020). Disabled people: in this document, this means people with impairments who choose to be part of the Disabled people's movement in the UK. These people stand up for rights for Disabled people across the country. This document looks at the fight against disability hate crime in England over the last 10 years. In 2008, we wrote a report called Getting Away With Murder . Getting Away with Murder Report: this was a report that was written in 2008 by Katharine Quarmby, together with Disability Now, the UK Disabled People’s Council and Scope. It looked at Disabled people’s experiences of hate crime in 2008. Since then, there have been lots of changes in the ways that disability hate crime is dealt with. This document looks at how things have changed since the last report was written. It is hard to say how much change there has been over the last 12 years.
    [Show full text]
  • DISABLED WOMEN and REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE Issues
    Home » Get the Facts » Reproductive Justice Issues » Reproductive Justice in Our ... Reproductive Justice DISABLED WOMEN AND REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE Issues by Mia Mingus, Georgians for Choice What is Reproductive Justice? Reproductive Justice in In the United States, a culture of ableism, which maintains that able­bodied Our Communities people are superior and most valuable, prevails. In this culture, disability is Parenting and Giving feared, hated, and typically regarded as a condition that reduces the value of Birth disabled people. The reproductive justice framework helps us understand how eugenic "science" is still a vibrant part of U.S. culture that interacts with and Abortion and Birth Control shapes the reproductive lives of disabled women in many ways. Sex Education Right to Parent Access to Reproductive Health Care Women with disabilities (WWD) have a long history of forced sterilization, are often seen as "unfit" mothers and are discouraged from having children, or not Reproductive allowed to adopt children. Authorities press disabled women to feel guilty for Technologies their decisions to be parents, pointing out that their decision will take a "toll" on Spirituality and ON OUR TERMS their children, families, communities and on themselves. Reproductive Justice THE RISE INITIATIVE Sexuality Sexual Health, Anatomy, and STD's BUILDING THE Society typically defines disabled women as asexual and as dependent on able­ MOVEMENT bodied people, undermining these women's access to reproductive health. In This Section Disabled women and girls often do not receive sex and reproductive health VOLUNTEER Are We Next? Immigrant education. Health care providers may fail to ask WWD about their sexual lives, Rights and Access to AD CAMPAIGNS conduct full pelvic exams or screen WWD for STD/HIV, because it is assumed Health Care that these women do not have sex, or that they should not have sex.
    [Show full text]
  • Harassment and Victimisation Introduction
    Harassment and victimisation Introduction Stockholm University is to be characterised by its excellent environment for work and study. All employees and students shall be treated equally and with respect. At Stockholm University we shall jointly safeguard our work and study environment. A good environment enables creative development and excellent outcomes for work and study. At Stockholm University, victimisation, harassment associated with discrimination on any grounds and sexual harassment are unacceptable and must not take place. Victimisation, harassment and sexual harassment all jeopardise the affected person's job satisfaction and chances of success in work or study. As soon as the university becomes aware that someone has been affected, action will be taken immediately. In this brochure, Stockholm University explains • the forms that victimisation, harassment and sexual harassment may take, • what you can do if you or someone else becomes subjected to such behaviour, • the university's responsibilities, • the sanctions faced by those subjecting a person to victimisation, harassment or sexual harassment. Astrid Söderbergh Widding Vice-Chancellor Production: Human Resources Office, Student Services, Council for Equal Opportunities and Equality, and Matador kommunikation. Illustrations: Jan Ed. Printing: Ark-Tryckaren, 2015. 3 What is victimisation? All organisations experience occasional differences of opinion, conflicts and difficulties in working together. However, these occasional conflicts are not considered victimisation or bullying. Victimisation is defined as recurrent reprehensible or negative actions directed against individuals and that may lead to the person experiencing it being marginalised. Examples include deliberate insults, demeaning treatment, ostracism, withholding of information, persecution or threats. Victimisation brings with it the risk that individuals as well as entire groups will be adversely affected, in both the short and long terms.
    [Show full text]