DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of the Interior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of the Interior Wednesday, March 25, 2009 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a Petition To List the Yellow-Billed Loon as Threatened or Endangered; Proposed Rules VerDate Nov<24>2008 01:29 Mar 25, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\25MRP2.SGM 25MRP2 PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2 12932 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 25, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR scientific and commercial information scientific or commercial information to that listing may be warranted, we make indicate that a listing may be warranted Fish and Wildlife Service a finding within 12 months of the date and announced that a status review of receipt of the petition on whether the would be promptly commenced. In that 50 CFR Part 17 petitioned action is: (a) Not warranted, notice we announced the opening of a [FWS–R7–ES–2009–0133; MO9221050083– (b) warranted, or (c) warranted, but that 60-day information collection period B2] immediate proposal of a regulation and invited the public to submit to us implementing the petitioned action is any pertinent information concerning Endangered and Threatened Wildlife precluded by other pending proposals to the status of or threats to this species. and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a determine whether species are Approximately 28,000 comments were Petition To List the Yellow-Billed Loon threatened or endangered, and received during the information as Threatened or Endangered expeditious progress is being made to collection period. We also consulted add or remove qualified species from with recognized yellow-billed loon AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, the Lists of Endangered and Threatened experts and other Federal and State Interior. Wildlife and Plants. Section 4(b)(3)(C) of agencies. We sent letters to national ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition the Act requires that we treat a petition wildlife or natural resource agencies in finding. for which the requested action is found Canada, China, Japan, North Korea, to be warranted but precluded as though Norway, Republic of Korea (South SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and resubmitted on the date of such finding, Korea), and the Russian Federation, Wildlife Service (Service), announce a and is, therefore, subject to a new asking for information about ongoing 12-month finding on a petition to list finding to be made within 12 months management measures and any the yellow-billed loon (Gavia adamsii) and subsequently thereafter until we conservation and management strategies as threatened or endangered, with take action on a proposal to list or being developed to protect the species. critical habitat, under the Endangered withdraw our original finding. We must We received a formal response from the Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). publish these 12-month findings in the government of Canada, and an informal The petitioners provided two listing Federal Register. response from a government biologist in options for consideration by the Service: the Russian Federation. (1) Listing the yellow-billed loon Previous Federal Actions On June 11, 2007, we received a 60- throughout its range, or (2) listing the On April 5, 2004, we received a day notice of intent to sue from the United States population of the yellow- petition from the Center for Biological Center for Biological Diversity alleging a billed loon as a Distinct Population Diversity (CBD) (Sitka, AK), Natural violation of section 4 of the ESA for Segment (DPS). After a review of the Resources Defense Council failure to complete a 12-month finding best available scientific and commercial (Washington, DC), Pacific Environment on the petition. We informed the information, we have determined that (San Francisco, CA), Trustees for Alaska plaintiffs by letter dated July 9, 2007, listing the yellow-billed loon rangewide (Anchorage, AK), Kaira Club (Chukotka, that further action on the petition was under the Act is warranted but Anadyr, Russia), Kronotsky Nature precluded by higher priority listing precluded by other higher priority Preserve (Kamchatka Region, Russia), actions but that, pending the fiscal year listing actions. Taiga Rangers (Khabarovsk Region, 2008 allocation of funds, we hoped to DATES: This finding was made on March Russia), Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk Local complete the 12-month finding within 25, 2009. Public Fund (Sakhalin Region, Russia), that fiscal year. Interregional Public Charitable On December 19, 2007, the Center for ADDRESSES: This finding is available on Organization of Far Eastern Resource Biological Diversity (CBD) filed a the Internet at http:// Centers (Vladivostok, Russia), complaint alleging that the Service had www.regulations.gov. Data, information, Kamchatka Branch of Pacific Institute of failed to make a timely 12-month comments, or questions regarding this Geography (Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, finding on the petition, as required notice should be submitted to the Field Russia), and Kamchatka League of under section 4 of the ESA. Consistent Supervisor, Endangered Species Branch, Independent Experts (Petropavlovsk- with a settlement agreement reached Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Kamchatsky, Russia) to list the yellow- between the Service and CBD, the Court Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, billed loon as endangered or threatened ordered the Service to submit this 12- 101–12th Ave., Room 110, Fairbanks, throughout its range, or as a Distinct month finding for publication to the AK 99701. The complete administrative Population Segment in the United Federal Register by February 15, 2009. file for this finding is available for States, and to designate critical habitat Because the Service later received public inspection, by appointment, once listed. The petition summarizes substantial new information to be during normal business hours at the threats to the species based on CBD’s evaluated and considered in the 12- above address. review of Fair’s (2002) report, prepared month finding, we subsequently sought FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. for the Natural Resources Defense and were granted a one month extension Ted Swem, Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Council and Trustees for Alaska, on the with a new deadline of March 16, 2009. Field Office (see ADDRESSES) (telephone status and significance of the species in This notice constitutes a 12-month 907–456–0441; facsimile 907–456– Alaska, as well as CBD’s review of the finding for the petition to list the 0208). If you use a telecommunications scientific literature. In September 2006, yellow-billed loon as threatened or device for the deaf (TDD), call the the Service completed a ‘‘Conservation endangered. The petitioners provided Federal Information Relay Service Agreement for the Yellow-billed Loon two listing options for consideration by (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. (Gavia adamsii)’’ with Federal, State, the Service: (1) Listing the yellow-billed SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and local partners. In response to the loon throughout its range, or (2) listing petition, we published a 90-day finding the United States population of the Background on the yellow-billed loon in the Federal yellow-billed loon as a Distinct Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act (16 Register on June 6, 2007 (72 FR 31256). Population Segment (DPS). Because we U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that, for In the 90-day finding we determined find that listing the yellow-billed loon any petition presenting substantial that the petition presented substantial rangewide is warranted at this time, VerDate Nov<24>2008 01:29 Mar 25, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25MRP2.SGM 25MRP2 PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 25, 2009 / Proposed Rules 12933 there is no need to conduct further Species Biology (Pandalus danae, Spirontocaris analysis of whether listing the United The yellow-billed loon is a migratory ochotensis), hermit crabs (Pagarus sp.), States population of the yellow-billed bird. Solitary pairs breed on lakes in the and marine worms (Nereis sp.) (Bailey loon as a DPS, which is a smaller arctic tundra of the United States, 1922, p. 205; Cottam and Knappen 1939, geographic entity than the entire range, Russia, and Canada from June to p. 139; North 1994, pp. 6–7; Earnst 2004, pp. 9–10). Pacific sand dabs is warranted, as this consideration is September. During the remainder of the subsumed by the rangewide warranted (Citharichthys sordidus) were found in year the species winters in more but precluded finding. a yellow-billed loon collected southern coastal waters of the Pacific extralimitally (i.e., outside the limits of Outline of This Notice Ocean and the Norway and North Seas. the species’ range) in Baja California Non-breeding birds remain in marine In this notice, we first provide (Jehl 1970, p. 376) and sculpin waters throughout the year, either in background information on the biology (Myoxocephalus scorpius) in a wintering areas or offshore from of the yellow-billed loon. Next, we specimen collected in Norway (Collett breeding grounds. address each of the categories of factors 1894, p. 280). Prey species taken in The following information regarding listed in section 4(a)(1) of the Act. For other wintering grounds, such as in the each factor, we first determine whether the description and natural history of Yellow Sea (which supports 276 fish any stressors, or risk factors, appear to the yellow-billed loon (American species and 54 crustacean species; be negatively affecting yellow-billed Ornithologists’ Union 1998, p. 5) has UNDP 2002, p. 8) are unknown. loons anywhere within the species’ been condensed from the status During the breeding season, foraging range. If we determine they are, then we assessments conducted by North (1994) habitats include lakes, rivers, and the evaluate whether each of these risk and Earnst (2004), and updated with nearshore marine environment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Species Accepted –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Swinhoe’S Storm-Petrel (Oceanodroma Monorhis )
    his is the 20th published report of the ABA Checklist Committee (hereafter, TCLC), covering the period July 2008– July 2009. There were no changes to commit - tee membership since our previous report (Pranty et al. 2008). Kevin Zimmer has been elected to serve his second term (to expire at the end of 2012), and Bill Pranty has been reelected to serve as Chair for a fourth year. During the preceding 13 months, the CLC final - ized votes on five species. Four species were accepted and added to the ABA Checklist , while one species was removed. The number of accepted species on the ABA Checklist is increased to 960. In January 2009, the seventh edition of the ABA Checklist (Pranty et al. 2009) was published. Each species is numbered from 1 (Black-bellied Whistling-Duck) to 957 (Eurasian Tree Sparrow); ancillary numbers will be inserted for all new species, and these numbers will be included in our annual reports. Production of the seventh edi - tion of the ABA Checklist occupied much of Pranty’s and Dunn’s time during the period, and this com - mitment helps to explain the relative paucity of votes during 2008–2009 compared to our other recent an - nual reports. New Species Accepted –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Swinhoe’s Storm-Petrel (Oceanodroma monorhis ). ABA CLC Record #2009-02. One individual, thought to be a juvenile in slightly worn plumage, in the At - lantic Ocean at 3 4°5 7’ N, 7 5°0 5’ W, approximately 65 kilometers east-southeast of Hatteras Inlet, Cape Hat - teras, North Carolina on 2 June 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Variation in Leach's Storm-Petrel
    GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN LEACH'S STORM-PETREL DAVID G. AINLEY Point Reyes Bird Observatory, 4990 State Route 1, Stinson Beach, California 94970 USA ABSTRACT.-•A total of 678 specimens of Leach's Storm-Petrels (Oceanodroma leucorhoa) from known nestinglocalities was examined, and 514 were measured. Rump color, classifiedon a scale of 1-11 by comparison with a seriesof reference specimens,varied geographicallybut was found to be a poor character on which to base taxonomic definitions. Significant differences in five size charactersindicated that the presentlyaccepted, but rather confusing,taxonomy should be altered: (1) O. l. beali, O. l. willetti, and O. l. chapmani should be merged into O. l. leucorhoa;(2) O. l. socorroensisshould refer only to the summer breeding population on Guadalupe Island; and (3) the winter breeding Guadalupe population should be recognizedas a "new" subspecies,based on physiological,morphological, and vocal characters,with the proposedname O. l. cheimomnestes. The clinal and continuoussize variation in this speciesis related to oceanographicclimate, length of migration, mobility during the nesting season,and distancesbetween nesting islands. Why oceanitidsfrequenting nearshore waters during nestingare darker rumped than thoseoffshore remains an unanswered question, as does the more basic question of why rump color varies geographicallyin this species.Received 15 November 1979, accepted5 July 1980. DURING field studies of Leach's Storm-Petrels (Oceanodroma leucorhoa) nesting on Southeast Farallon Island, California in 1972 and 1973 (see Ainley et al. 1974, Ainley et al. 1976), several birds were captured that had dark or almost completely dark rumps. The subspecificidentity of the Farallon population, which at that time was O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cycle of the Common Loon (Brochure)
    ADIRONDACK LOONS AND LAKES FOR MORE INFORMATION: NEED YOUR HELP! lthough the Adirondack Park provides A suitable habitat for breeding loons, the summering population in the Park still faces many challenges. YOU CAN HELP! WCS’ Adirondack Loon Conservation Program Keep Shorelines Natural: Help maintain ~The Cycle of the this critical habitat for nesting wildlife and 7 Brandy Brook Ave, Suite 204 for the quality of our lake water. Saranac Lake, NY 12983 Common Loon~ (518) 891-8872, [email protected] Out on a Lake? Keep your distance (~100 feet or more) from loons and other wildlife, www.wcs.org/adirondackloons so that you do not disturb them. The Wildlife Conservation Society’s Adirondack Going Fishing? Loon Conservation Program is dedicated to ∗ Use Non-Lead Fishing Sinkers and improving the overall health of the environment, Jigs. Lead fishing tackle is poisonous to particularly the protection of air and water loons and other wildlife when quality, through collaborative research and accidentally ingested. education efforts focusing on the natural history ∗ Pack Out Your Line. Invisible in the of the Common Loon (Gavia immer) and water, lost or cut fishing line can conservation issues affecting loon populations entangle loons and other wildlife, often and their aquatic habitats. with fatal results. THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY IS Be an Environmentally Wise Consumer: GRATEFUL TO ITS COLLABORATORS FOR THEIR Many forms of environmental pollution SUPPORT OF THE LOON PROGRAM: result from the incineration of fossil Natural History Museum of the Adirondacks - fuels, primarily from coal-fired power The W!ld Center plants and vehicles, negatively affecting www.wildcenter.org A guide to the seasonal Adirondack ecosystems and their wild NYS Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 FINAL MAMU Reportav
    Summary of 2010 Marbled Murrelet Monitoring Surveys In the Santa Cruz Mountains Prepared For: Department of Parks and Recreation Santa Cruz District 303 Big Trees Park Road Felton CA, 95018 Prepared By: Brian Shaw Klamath Wildlife Resources 1760 Kenyon Drive Redding, CA 96001 12/31/2010 Edited for clarity, organization and content by: Portia Halbert ES for California State Parks 12/19/2014 INTRODUCTION This report covers the results of Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) monitoring surveys completed in 2010 for the Santa Cruz District of California State Parks, and is the first of a three-year monitoring effort for the seabird. The surveys took place at Big Basin Redwoods State Park, Portola Redwoods State Park, Butano State Park and San Mateo County Memorial Park. These surveys are carried out in support of and to follow-up data gathered by previous similar studies completed in the Santa Cruz Mountains from years back as far as 1992. It also continues an ongoing effort to study murrelet populations after the Command oil spill that occurred in 1988. METHODOLOGY In previous years, California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) has funded this work; at Portola and Big Basin since 1992 and 1995. At Portola, monitoring years included 1992- 1995, 1998, as well as in 2001-2003 and included only one murrelet observation station. The study has been carried out at Big Basin at five survey stations over the years of 1995-1996, 1998, and 2001-2003. During the 1995-1996, and 1998 the monitoring at Big Basin consisted of five surveys at each station during the protocol period.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Species Likely to Benefit from Marine Protected Areas in The
    Appendix C: Species Likely to Benefit from MPAs andSpecial-Status Species This appendix contains two sections: C.1 Species likely to benefit from marine protected areas in the MLPA South Coast Study Region C.2 Special status species likely to occur in the MLPA South Coast Study Region C.1 Species Likely to Benefit From MPAs The Marine Life Protection Act requires that species likely to benefit from MPAs be identified; identification of these species will contribute to the identification of habitat areas that will support achieving the goals of the MLPA. The California Marine Life Protection Act Master Plan for Marine Protected Areas (DFG 2008) includes a broad list of species likely to benefit from protection within MPAs. The master plan also indicates that regional lists will be developed by the MLPA Master Plan Science Advisory Team (SAT) for each study region described in the master plan. A list of species likely to benefit for the MLPA South Coast Study Region (Point Conception in Santa Barbara County to the California/Mexico border in San Diego County) has been compiled and approved by the SAT. The SAT used a scoring system to develop the list of species likely to benefit. This scoring system was developed to provide a metric that is more useful when comparing species than a simple on/off the list metric. Each species was scored using “1” to indicate a criterion was met or “0” to indicate a criterion was not met. Species on the list meet the following filtering criteria: they occur in the study region, they must score a “1” for either
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2015 Contents
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2015 Contents ABOUT THE REPORT 1 HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT 52 Key themes and aspects of information disclosure 2 Goals and results of activities Significant themes and aspects of the 2015 Report 3 to develop human resource potential in 2015 54 Employee demographics 56 MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 4 HR management system 57 Employer brand 59 MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD 6 Remuneration and social support for personnel 60 Cooperation with trade unions 62 ABOUT THE COMPANY 8 Personnel training and development 62 Mission 10 Development of the talent pool 67 Gazprom Neft values 10 Work with graduates and young professionals 68 Strategic goal 10 Goals for 2016 69 Core businesses and structure of Company 11 Geography of operations 12 SAFE DEVELOPMENT: INDUSTRIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, Gazprom Neft in 2015: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY, ENERGY EFFICIENCY key financial and production results 13 AND ENERGY CONSERVATION 70 Policy and management 72 ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE AND INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT 14 Supply chain responsibility 75 Exploration and production 16 Stakeholder engagement 76 Oil refining 18 Industrial safety and occupational health and safety 78 Sale of oil and petroleum products 19 Goals and results of industrial and occupational Sale of petroleum products by the filling safety activities in 2015 80 station network and by product business units 20 Mitigating the negative environmental impact Petrochemistry 23 and the effective use of resources 82 Innovation 24
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Loon
    Pacific Loon (Gavia pacifica) Vulnerability: Presumed Stable Confidence: Moderate The Pacific Loon is the most common breeding loon in Arctic Alaska, nesting throughout much of the state (Russell 2002). This species typically breeds on lakes that are ≥1 ha in size in both boreal and tundra habitats. They are primarily piscivorous although they are known to commonly feed chicks invertebrates (D. Rizzolo and J. Schmutz, unpublished data). Many Pacific Loons spend their winters in offshore waters of the west coast of Canada and the U.S. (Russell 2002). The most recent Alaska population estimate is 100-125,000 individuals (Ruggles and Tankersley 1992) with ~ 69,500 on the Arctic Coastal Plain specifically (Groves et al. 1996). encroachment (Tape et al. 2006) into tundra habitats. Although small fish make up a significant part of the Pacific Loon diet, they also eat many invertebrates (e.g., caddis fly larvae, nostracods) and so, unlike some other loon species, exhibit enough flexibility in their diet that they would likely be able to adjust to climate-mediated changes in prey base. S. Zack @ WCS Range: We used the extant NatureServe map for the assessment as it matched other range map sources and descriptions (Johnson and Herter 1989, Russell 2002). Physiological Hydro Niche: Among the indirect exposure and sensitivity factors in the assessment (see table on next page), Pacific Loons ranked neutral in most categories with the exception of physiological hydrologic niche for which they were evaluated to have a “slightly to greatly increased” vulnerability. This response was driven primarily by this species reliance on small water bodies (typically <1ha) for breeding Disturbance Regime: Climate-mediated and foraging.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Birds of the Estero Bay Area
    Common Birds of the Estero Bay Area Jeremy Beaulieu Lisa Andreano Michael Walgren Introduction The following is a guide to the common birds of the Estero Bay Area. Brief descriptions are provided as well as active months and status listings. Photos are primarily courtesy of Greg Smith. Species are arranged by family according to the Sibley Guide to Birds (2000). Gaviidae Red-throated Loon Gavia stellata Occurrence: Common Active Months: November-April Federal Status: None State/Audubon Status: None Description: A small loon seldom seen far from salt water. In the non-breeding season they have a grey face and red throat. They have a long slender dark bill and white speckling on their dark back. Information: These birds are winter residents to the Central Coast. Wintering Red- throated Loons can gather in large numbers in Morro Bay if food is abundant. They are common on salt water of all depths but frequently forage in shallow bays and estuaries rather than far out at sea. Because their legs are located so far back, loons have difficulty walking on land and are rarely found far from water. Most loons must paddle furiously across the surface of the water before becoming airborne, but these small loons can practically spring directly into the air from land, a useful ability on its artic tundra breeding grounds. Pacific Loon Gavia pacifica Occurrence: Common Active Months: November-April Federal Status: None State/Audubon Status: None Description: The Pacific Loon has a shorter neck than the Red-throated Loon. The bill is very straight and the head is very smoothly rounded.
    [Show full text]
  • AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2018-B 17 January 2018
    AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2018-B 17 January 2018 No. Page Title 01 02 Split Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus into four species 02 05 Restore Canada Jay as the English name of Perisoreus canadensis 03 13 Recognize two genera in Stercorariidae 04 15 Split Red-eyed Vireo (Vireo olivaceus) into two species 05 19 Split Pseudobulweria from Pterodroma 06 25 Add Tadorna tadorna (Common Shelduck) to the Checklist 07 27 Add three species to the U.S. list 08 29 Change the English names of the two species of Gallinula that occur in our area 09 32 Change the English name of Leistes militaris to Red-breasted Meadowlark 10 35 Revise generic assignments of woodpeckers of the genus Picoides 11 39 Split the storm-petrels (Hydrobatidae) into two families 1 2018-B-1 N&MA Classification Committee p. 280 Split Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus into four species Effect on NACC: This proposal would change the species circumscription of Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus by splitting it into four species. The form that occurs in the NACC area is nominate pacificus, so the current species account would remain unchanged except for the distributional statement and notes. Background: The Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus was until recently (e.g., Chantler 1999, 2000) considered to consist of four subspecies: pacificus, kanoi, cooki, and leuconyx. Nominate pacificus is highly migratory, breeding from Siberia south to northern China and Japan, and wintering in Australia, Indonesia, and Malaysia. The other subspecies are either residents or short distance migrants: kanoi, which breeds from Taiwan west to SE Tibet and appears to winter as far south as southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of 2010 Marbled Murrelet Monitoring Surveys in the Santa Cruz Mountains
    Summary of 2010 Marbled Murrelet Monitoring Surveys In the Santa Cruz Mountains Prepared For: Department of Parks and Recreation Santa Cruz District 303 Big Trees Park Road Felton CA, 95018 Prepared By: Brian Shaw Klamath Wildlife Resources 1760 Kenyon Drive Redding, CA 96001 12/31/2010 INTRODUCTION This report covers the results of Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) monitoring surveys completed in 2010 for the Santa Cruz District of the California State Parks, and is the first of a three-year monitoring effort for the seabird. The surveys took place at Big Trees State Park, Portola Redwood State Park, Butano State Park and San Mateo County Memorial Park. These surveys are carried out in support of and to follow-up similar data taken by previous similar studies completed here in the during 2003 and in previous years. It also continues an ongoing effort to study murrelet populations after the oil spill that occurred nearby in 1988. METHODOLOGY In previous years, California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) has funded this work; at Portola and Big Basin since 1992 and 1995. At Portola, monitoring years included 1992- 1995, 1998, as well as in 2001-2003 and included only one murrelet observation station. The study has been carried out at Big Basin at five survey stations over the years of 1995-1996, 1998, and 2001-2003. During the 1995-1996, and 1998 the monitoring at Big Basin consisted of five surveys at each station during the protocol period. Coverage was minimized during the 2001-2003 years, with just three surveys annually completed at each observing station from mid-June to late-July, with two in July.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazprom EE 2014 11.Indd
    OAO Gazprom Environmental Report 2014 The Power of Growth OAO Gazprom Environmental Report 2014 Table of contents 5 Letter of Deputy Chairman of OAO Gazprom Management Committee 6 Introduction 8 Environmental protection management 8 Environmental Management System 11 Environmental targets and programs 13 Financing of environmental protection 16 Adverse environmental impact fee 20 Environmental performance and energy saving 20 Air protection 24 Greenhouse gas emissions 25 Utilization of associated petroleum gas 27 Reduction of vehicle fl eet impact on air 29 Water use and protection of water resources 31 Production and consumption waste management 36 Protection of land and soil 40 Protection of biodiversity 43 Energy saving 46 Parameters of environmental activity and environmental impact of OAO Gazprom abroad 48 Preventing negative impact on the environment 48 Environmental assessment of projects 50 Production environmental monitoring and control 56 Accidents and incidents 57 Environmental risks insurance 58 State environmental control 59 Environment protection scientifi c and technical support 59 Scientifi c research and development 64 Implementation of the best available technologies for environmental protection 65 Gazprom Prize in science and technical engineering 67 International cooperation 69 Information disclosure 71 Major results of Year of Environmental Awareness in OAO Gazprom 74 Offi cial events of OAO Gazprom 77 Events of subsidiary companies 84 Conclusion 85 Glossary of main terms and abbreviations 87 Addresses and contacts OAO Gazprom Environmental Report 2014 Letter of Deputy Chairman of 5 OAO Gazprom Management Committee Dear readers! On behalf of the OAO Gazprom Management Committee I present you our Environmental Report 2014. In the Gazprom strategy as both socially responsible and power industry company, we pay special attention to the issues of preservation of nature, environmental protection and energy saving.
    [Show full text]
  • Loons: Wildlife Notebook Series
    Loons Loons are known as “spirits of the wilderness,” and it is fitting that Alaska has all five species of loons found in the world. Loons are an integral part of Alaska's wilderness—a living symbol of Alaska's clean water and high level of environmental quality. Loons, especially common loons, are most famous for their call. The cry of a loon piercing the summer twilight is one of the most thrilling sounds of nature. The sight or sound of one of these birds in Alaskan waters gives a special meaning to many, as if it were certifying the surrounding as a truly wild place. Description: Loons have stout bodies, long necks, pointed bills, three-toed webbed feet, and spend most of their time afloat. Loons are sometimes confused with cormorants, mergansers, grebes, and other diving water birds. Loons have solid bones, and compress the air out of their feathers to float low in the water. A loon's bill is held parallel to the water, but the cormorant holds its hooked bill at an angle. Mergansers have narrower bills and a crest. Grebes, also diving water birds, are relatively short-bodied. Loons can be distinguished from ducks in flight by their slower wing beat and low-slung necks and heads. The five species of loons found in Alaska are the common, yellow-billed, red-throated, pacific and arctic. Common loons (Gavia immer), have deep black or dark green heads and necks and dark backs with an intricate pattern of black and white stripes, spots, squares, and rectangles. The yellow-billed loon (Gavia adamsii) is similar, but it has white spots on its back and a straw-yellow bill even in winter.
    [Show full text]