DOCSLIB.ORG

North Norfolk Landscape Character Assessment Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Norfolk Landscape Character Assessment Contents Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Landscape Character Assessment Documents 3. North Norfolk District Council Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: ExA; ISH; 10.D3.1E 3 Deadline 3 Date: February 2019 Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm LCA cover 09:Layout 1 14/7/09 15:31 Page 1 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT NORTH NORFOLK Local Development Framework Landscape Character Assessment Supplementary Planning Document www.northnorfolk.org June 2009 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.northnorfolk.org/ldf All of the LDF Documents can be made available in Braille, audio, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516318 to discuss your requirements. Cover Photo: Skelding Hill, Sheringham. Image courtesy of Alan Howard Professional Photography © North Norfolk Landscape Character Assessment Contents 1 Landscape Character Assessment 3 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 What is Landscape Character Assessment? 5 2 North Norfolk Landscape Character Assessment 9 2.1 Methodology 9 2.2 Outputs from the Characterisation Stage 12 2.3 Outputs from the Making Judgements Stage 14 3 How to use the Landscape Character Assessment 19 3.1 User Guide 19 3.2 Landscape Character Assessment Map 21 Landscape Character Types 4 Rolling Open Farmland 23 4.1 Egmere, Barsham, Tatterford Area (ROF1) 33 4.2 Wells-next-the-Sea Area (ROF2) 34 4.3 Fakenham Area (ROF3) 35 4.4 Raynham Area (ROF4) 36 4.5 Sculthorpe Airfield Area (ROF5) 36 5 Tributary Farmland 39 5.1 Morston and Hindringham (TF1) 49 5.2 Snoring, Stibbard and Hindolveston (TF2) 50 5.3 Hempstead, Bodham, Aylmerton and Wickmere Area (TF3) 51 5.4 Roughton, Southrepps, Trunch and Knapton Area (TF4) 52 5.5 Raynham, Pudding Norton and Great Ryburgh Area (TF5) 53 6 Low Plains 55 6.1 Edingthorpe to Honing Area (LP1) 64 6.2 Stalham Area (LP2) 64 6.3 Worstead, Coltishall, Hoveton and Smallburgh Area (LP3) 65 6.4 Colby, Banningham, Felmingham and Skeyton Area (LP4) 67 6.5 North Walsham Area (LP5) 68 7 Large Valleys 71 7.1 Raynham to Great Ryburgh (LV1) 80 7.2 Stiffkey to Warham (LV2) 82 7.3 Wiveton to Letheringsett (LV3) 84 7.4 White Horse Common to Briggate (LV4) 86 7.5 Saxthorpe to Itteringham (LV5) 88 8 Small Valleys 91 8.1 Wighton to Fulmodeston (SV1) 100 8.2 Binham to Langham (SV2) 101 8.3 Thornage to Brinton (SV3) 101 8.4 Banningham to Suffield (SV4) 102 8.5 Southrepps, Antingham and Spa Common (SV5) 103 8.6 Mun Valley (SV6) 104 8.7 Worstead, Beeston and Ashmanhaugh (SV7) 105 8.8 Gresham, Aldborough and Erpingham (SV8) 106 8.9 Raynham, Tatterford and Kettlestone (SV9) 107 North Norfolk Landscape Character Assessment Contents 9 Settled Fen 109 9.1 Stalham, Ludham and Potter Heigham (SF1) 118 10 Coastal Plain 119 10.1 Bacton to Sea Palling (CP1) 129 10.2 Sea Palling to Waxham (CP2) 130 11 Coastal Towns & Villages 133 11.1 Weybourne to Sheringham (CTV1) 143 11.2 Sheringham to Overstrand (CTV2) 143 11.3 Sidestrand to Mundesley (CTV3) 145 12 Wooded with Parkland 147 12.1 Holkham (WP1) 158 12.2 Holt Cromer Area (WP2) 158 12.3 Gunton and Hanworth (WP3) 160 12.4 Wolterton and Mannington (WP4) 161 12.5 Plumstead and Barningham (WP5) 162 12.6 Westwick and Swanton Abbott (WP6) 162 12.7 Thursford, Swanton Novers and Melton Constable (WP7) 163 13 Rolling Heath & Arable 165 13.1 Blakeney Area (RHA1) 174 13.2 Salthouse and Kelling Area (RHA2) 175 14 Drained Coastal Marshes 177 14.1 Holkham (DCM1) 184 14.2 Blakeney, Wiveton, Cley and Salthouse (DCM2) 186 15 Open Coastal Marshes 189 15.1 Wells-next-the-Sea (OCM1) 196 15.2 Stiffkey (OCM2) 196 15.3 Morston and Blakeney (OCM3) 197 Appendices A Geology & Landscape in North Norfolk 200 B Glossary 201 North Norfolk Landscape Character Assessment 3 Landscape Character Assessment 1 1 Landscape Character Assessment 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 Landscape as an entity is not static but is constantly changing and developing. Decisions relating to development often impinge considerably upon landscape, changing and altering it. It is therefore important that proposals are informed by an understanding of the landscape and what factors may be more, or less, appropriate. 1.1.2 North Norfolk District Council Core Strategy Policy EN2 requires that proposals for development should be informed by, and be sympathetic to, the distinctive character of an area. This Landscape Character Assessment provides the tools to help implement this policy and should be used alongside more detailed site specific appraisals of an area at the time of application. Structure of the Landscape Character Assessment 1.1.3 The document is arranged into different chapters with the main analysis of Landscape Character contained within the Character Types and Character Area chapters. The map in chapter 3 illustrates where the different Types and Areas are found. 1.1.4 For those users unfamiliar with Landscape Character Assessments, it may help to understand the reasoning behind how, and why, certain judgements are made within the North Norfolk Landscape Character Assessment by reading the Introduction section. This details the development of Landscape Character Assessment, an overview of the process involved, and how it can be utilised when making decisions about development within the context of landscape and the Core Strategy policies. A User Guide is included in section 3 of the document to enable those less familiar with Landscape Character Assessment to help interpret the Core Strategy policy and this document. 1.1.5 Chapter 2 describes the North Norfolk Landscape Character Assessment in detail, explaining the rationale, principles and processes behind the assessment. This should be referred to during use to gain the context of the study. Policy Context 1.1.6 The North Norfolk Core Strategy incorporating development control policies was adopted by the Council on 24 September 2008. This contains a series of polices which will be used to determine planning applications in the District. It covers the period to 2021 but can be reviewed within that period. 1.1.7 Core Strategy Policy EN2, Protection of Landscape and Settlement Character, requires that proposals should be informed by, and be sympathetic to, the distinctive character areas identified in the Landscape Character Assessment. This document is therefore an important piece of evidence that should be used to inform development proposals and consideration of planning applications. 1.1.8 Government policy (PPS1 - Delivering Sustainable Development) requires that development plans and decisions on planning applications contribute to the delivery of sustainable development, by: Seeking to achieve environmental, economic and social objectives together over time, addressing the causes and potential impacts of climate change, taking a spatial approach to planning, promoting high quality inclusive design, improving access for all, and ensuring that communities can contribute to the planning process. 4 North Norfolk Landscape Character Assessment 1 Landscape Character Assessment 1.1.9 This document has had regard to, and seeks to achieve, these principles. It was subject to sustainability appraisal which requires consideration of the range of effects (both positive and negative) on the environment, as well as the possible effects of development in terms of economic benefits and social well being. Decision Making and Conflicts 1.1.10 When considering development proposals or planning applications, judgements made through the LCA process will be important in informing the final decision. As stated in section 2 landscape character assessment is not a tool designed to resist changes that may influence the landscape. Rather it is an aid to decision making, a tool to help understand what the landscape is like today, how it came to be like that and how it may change in the future. Government policy in PPS1 requires that development plans and decisions on planning applications contribute to the delivery of sustainable development. In some circumstances a Planning Authority may decide in reaching a decision to give different weight to social, environmental, resource or economic considerations. Where this is the case, the reasons for doing so should be explicit and the consequences considered. Adverse environmental, social and economic impacts should be avoided, mitigated or compensated for. 1.1.11 Situations may arise where there is conflict between LCA conclusions and the social and economic objectives of the Core Strategy. In these instances the benefits and consequences should be carefully considered and, if development is to proceed, the information contained in the LCA should be used to minimise the impact of the development on the character of the landscape or steer it to a more appropriate location (in terms of landscape character) if possible. 1.1.12 Site specific appraisals, such as through individual landscape character and visual assessments, will be important in translating the principles contained in the LCA to individual proposals. Renewable Energy 1.1.13 Government policy on Renewable Energy (PPS22) requires that local development documents should contain policies which promote and encourage, rather than restrict, the development of renewable energy resources. The wider environmental and economic benefits of all proposals for renewable energy projects, whatever their scale, are material considerations that should be given significant weight in determining whether proposals should be granted planning permission. 1.1.14 The landscape and visual effects of particular renewable energy development will vary on a case by case basis according to the type of development, its location and the landscape setting of the proposed development. Some of these effects may be minimised through appropriate siting, design and landscaping schemes, depending on the size and type of development proposed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Return of Result of Uncontested Election
    RETURN OF RESULT OF UNCONTESTED ELECTION North Norfolk Election of Councillors for Aldborough and Thurgarton on Thursday 7 May 2015 I, Sheila Oxtoby, being the Returning Officer for the of ALDBOROUGH AND THURGARTON at an Election of Councillors for the said report that the latest time for delivery of notices of withdrawal of candidature, namely Thursday 9 April 2015, having passed, the persons whose names appear in the accompanying list stood validly nominated and were duly elected without a contest. Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) BAILLIE The Bays, Chapel Road, Tony Thurgarton, Norwich, NR11 7NP ELLIOTT Sunholme, The Green, Paul Martin Aldborough, NR11 7AA GALLANT Spring Cottage, The Green, David Peter Aldborough, NR11 7AA WHEELER 4 Pipits Meadow, Aldborough, Jean Elizabeth NR11 7NW WORDINGHAM Two Oaks, Thurgarton Road, Peter Aldborough, NR11 7NY Dated Thursday 16 April 2015 Sheila Oxtoby Returning Officer Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Electoral Services, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, Norfolk, NR27 9EN RETURN OF RESULT OF UNCONTESTED ELECTION North Norfolk Election of Councillors for Antingham on Thursday 7 May 2015 I, Sheila Oxtoby, being the Returning Officer for the of ANTINGHAM at an Election of Councillors for the said report that the latest time for delivery of notices of withdrawal of candidature, namely Thursday 9 April 2015, having passed, the persons whose names appear in the accompanying list stood validly nominated and were duly elected without a contest. Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) EVERSON Margra, Southrepps Road, Graham Fredrick Antingham, North Walsham, NR28 0NP JONES The Old Coach House, Antingham Independent Graham Hall, Cromer Road, Antingham, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Share Report
    PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS For period ended 30th September 2019 SUMMARY OF PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS BY DEANERIES Dean Amount % Deanery Share Received for 2019 % Deanery Share % No Outstanding 2018 2019 to period end 2018 Received for 2018 received £ £ £ £ £ Norwich Archdeaconry 06 Norwich East 23,500 4.41 557,186 354,184 63.57 532,380 322,654 60.61 04 Norwich North 47,317 9.36 508,577 333,671 65.61 505,697 335,854 66.41 05 Norwich South 28,950 7.21 409,212 267,621 65.40 401,270 276,984 69.03 Norfolk Archdeaconry 01 Blofield 37,303 11.04 327,284 212,276 64.86 338,033 227,711 67.36 11 Depwade 46,736 16.20 280,831 137,847 49.09 288,484 155,218 53.80 02 Great Yarmouth 44,786 9.37 467,972 283,804 60.65 478,063 278,114 58.18 13 Humbleyard 47,747 11.00 437,949 192,301 43.91 433,952 205,085 47.26 14 Loddon 62,404 19.34 335,571 165,520 49.32 322,731 174,229 53.99 15 Lothingland 21,237 3.90 562,194 381,997 67.95 545,102 401,890 73.73 16 Redenhall 55,930 17.17 339,813 183,032 53.86 325,740 187,989 57.71 09 St Benet 36,663 9.24 380,642 229,484 60.29 396,955 243,433 61.33 17 Thetford & Rockland 31,271 10.39 314,266 182,806 58.17 300,933 192,966 64.12 Lynn Archdeaconry 18 Breckland 45,799 11.97 397,811 233,505 58.70 382,462 239,714 62.68 20 Burnham & Walsingham 63,028 15.65 396,393 241,163 60.84 402,850 256,123 63.58 12 Dereham in Mitford 43,605 12.03 353,955 223,631 63.18 362,376 208,125 57.43 21 Heacham & Rising 24,243 6.74 377,375 245,242 64.99 359,790 242,156 67.30 22 Holt 28,275 8.55 327,646 207,089 63.21 330,766 214,952 64.99 23 Lynn 10,805 3.30 330,152 196,022 59.37 326,964 187,510 57.35 07 Repps 0 0.00 383,729 278,123 72.48 382,728 285,790 74.67 03 08 Ingworth & Sparham 27,983 6.66 425,260 239,965 56.43 420,215 258,960 61.63 727,583 9.28 7,913,818 4,789,282 60.52 7,837,491 4,895,456 62.46 01/10/2019 NORWICH DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE LTD DEANERY HISTORY REPORT MONTH September YEAR 2019 SUMMARY PARISH 2017 OUTST.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheringham Coast Protection Scheme 2009
    Document 7 - Sheringham Coast Protection Scheme The challenge of protecting the coast at Sheringham Facing due north, Sheringham has a well documented history of coming under fierce attack by storm surge seas. Northerly winds blowing across the sea all the way from the North Pole can generate severe storm waves, which must be resisted by the natural and man-made defences of the town. If these defences fail then considerable damage will be sustained. The first line of defence is the natural sand beach and shingle bank to the rear. These are reinforced by the man-made defences comprising groynes, promenades and sea walls, which act as the last line of defence in extreme conditions. In the late 1980’s there was great concern about the integrity of the coastal defences at Sheringham. Waves and tides had gradually removed the once-healthy beach from this exposed stretch of the North Norfolk coast allowing storm waves to attack the man-made defences inflicting considerable damage. The sea walls, groynes and promenades (first built during the last century) have fixed the alignment of the frontage at Sheringham. Consequently, whilst the cliffs to the east and west of Sheringham have continued to erode naturally, the promenades now jut out by up to 70m seaward of the natural coast line. The exposed position of the beaches and defences means they are subject to an ever-increasing wave attack. Research has shown that most beaches in North Norfolk including Sheringham are eroding, getting shorter and steeper allowing deeper water inshore to attack the man made defences.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Through a Lens
    NORFOLK THROUGH A LENS A guide to the Photographic Collections held by Norfolk Library & Information Service 2 NORFOLK THROUGH A LENS A guide to the Photographic Collections held by Norfolk Library & Information Service History and Background The systematic collecting of photographs of Norfolk really began in 1913 when the Norfolk Photographic Survey was formed, although there are many images in the collection which date from shortly after the invention of photography (during the 1840s) and a great deal which are late Victorian. In less than one year over a thousand photographs were deposited in Norwich Library and by the mid- 1990s the collection had expanded to 30,000 prints and a similar number of negatives. The devastating Norwich library fire of 1994 destroyed around 15,000 Norwich prints, some of which were early images. Fortunately, many of the most important images were copied before the fire and those copies have since been purchased and returned to the library holdings. In 1999 a very successful public appeal was launched to replace parts of the lost archive and expand the collection. Today the collection (which was based upon the survey) contains a huge variety of material from amateur and informal work to commercial pictures. This includes newspaper reportage, portraiture, building and landscape surveys, tourism and advertising. There is work by the pioneers of photography in the region; there are collections by talented and dedicated amateurs as well as professional art photographers and early female practitioners such as Olive Edis, Viola Grimes and Edith Flowerdew. More recent images of Norfolk life are now beginning to filter in, such as a village survey of Ashwellthorpe by Richard Tilbrook from 1977, groups of Norwich punks and Norfolk fairs from the 1980s by Paul Harley and re-development images post 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code
    Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham
    [Show full text]
  • Tributary Farmland
    NORFOLK COAST COAST AONB AONB – Integrated – Integrated Landscape Landscape Guidance Guidance tributary farmland 1 tributary farmland Integrated landscape character MAP 23a - Landscape Character Type - Tributary Farmland Key Plan Tributary Farmland is typically an expansive landscape of open, gently rolling farmland. To the west, the farmland is underlain by deep drifts of Boulder Clay, which smother the underlying Chalk, but to the east of Sheringham, the soils of the Tributary Farmland have developed from sandier deposits, formed on drifts of brown sandy Norwich Brickearth underlain by the shelly sands and gravels of the Norwich Crag formation. Historically the area has been subdivided into relatively small tenanted and owner-occupied landholdings, based loosely around villages and this historic landownership pattern is reflected in the rather unregimented pattern of relatively small, irregularly shaped fields, loosely structured settlements and many scattered, isolated farmsteads and cottages. The majority of the landscape was not farmed as open fields, but was enclosed in a piecemeal fashion, over centuries. The Tributary Farmland has a less regulated and tightly structured landscape pattern than areas of farmland where Parliamentary Enclosure was more dominant, but over the years, the differences have become less marked as hedgerow removal and infill development within villages has led to larger, more geometric fields and a more nucleated settlement form. Arable field predominate, with areas of grassland in the smaller fields which are typically found on the fringes of settlements and individual rural properties. These fields often retain a strong sense of enclosure and echo the historic landscape pattern of a small-scale, more organic layout of fields, hedgerows and rural buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Consultation Report Appendix 20.3 Socc Stakeholder Mailing List
    Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Consultation Report Appendix 20.3 SoCC Stakeholder Mailing List Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: 5.1 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(q) Date: June 2018 Revision: Version 1 Author: BECG Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm This page is intentionally blank. Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Appendices Parish Councils Bacton and Edingthorpe Parish Council Witton and Ridlington Parish Council Brandiston Parish Council Guestwick Parish Council Little Witchingham Parish Council Marsham Parish Council Twyford Parish Council Lexham Parish Council Yaxham Parish Council Whinburgh and Westfield Parish Council Holme Hale Parish Council Bintree Parish Council North Tuddenham Parish Council Colkirk Parish Council Sporle with Palgrave Parish Council Shipdham Parish Council Bradenham Parish Council Paston Parish Council Worstead Parish Council Swanton Abbott Parish Council Alby with Thwaite Parish Council Skeyton Parish Council Melton Constable Parish Council Thurning Parish Council Pudding Norton Parish Council East Ruston Parish Council Hanworth Parish Council Briston Parish Council Kempstone Parish Council Brisley Parish Council Ingworth Parish Council Westwick Parish Council Stibbard Parish Council Themelthorpe Parish Council Burgh and Tuttington Parish Council Blickling Parish Council Oulton Parish Council Wood Dalling Parish Council Salle Parish Council Booton Parish Council Great Witchingham Parish Council Aylsham Town Council Heydon Parish Council Foulsham Parish Council Reepham
    [Show full text]
  • The Cromer Moraine
    THE CROMER MORAINE - A STUDY OF ITS PROGRESSIVE RECLAMATION ELIZABETH LANGTON ProQuest Number: 10097240 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10097240 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ilBSTRAGT The Cromer Moraine forms a distinctive geographical region near the coast of the northern part of the County of Norfolk. A pro­ nounced characteristic of this region is the vridespread cover of heatb-land, far less extensive than in former times. This heathland appears in its turn to have developed from an original woodland cover which was destroyed by the depredations of man and his domesticated animals . It has been necessary first to delimit the region as accurately as possible and this has been accomplished by means of a detailed study of local topography and of well-sections. The earliest evidence of the location of heathland comes from tlie Domesday Survey and this has been confirmed by references to heathland in various other documents dovm to 1750. By the middle of the eighteenth century the new developments in agriculture^ or ’Norfolk Husbandry’ as it was called, became widely known and practised, resulting in this region in a greatly accelerated reclama­ tion of heathland; so that by the time of the Tithe Survey (183S-42) less than a hundred years later over 4000 acres of heath had been reclaimed.
    [Show full text]
  • North Norfolk District Council (Alby
    DEFINITIVE STATEMENT OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY NORTH NORFOLK DISTRICT VOLUME I PARISH OF ALBY WITH THWAITE Footpath No. 1 (Middle Hill to Aldborough Mill). Starts from Middle Hill and runs north westwards to Aldborough Hill at parish boundary where it joins Footpath No. 12 of Aldborough. Footpath No. 2 (Alby Hill to All Saints' Church). Starts from Alby Hill and runs southwards to enter road opposite All Saints' Church. Footpath No. 3 (Dovehouse Lane to Footpath 13). Starts from Alby Hill and runs northwards, then turning eastwards, crosses Footpath No. 5 then again northwards, and continuing north-eastwards to field gate. Path continues from field gate in a south- easterly direction crossing the end Footpath No. 4 and U14440 continuing until it meets Footpath No.13 at TG 20567/34065. Footpath No. 4 (Park Farm to Sunday School). Starts from Park Farm and runs south westwards to Footpath No. 3 and U14440. Footpath No. 5 (Pack Lane). Starts from the C288 at TG 20237/33581 going in a northerly direction parallel and to the eastern boundary of the cemetery for a distance of approximately 11 metres to TG 20236/33589. Continuing in a westerly direction following the existing path for approximately 34 metres to TG 20201/33589 at the western boundary of the cemetery. Continuing in a generally northerly direction parallel to the western boundary of the cemetery for approximately 23 metres to the field boundary at TG 20206/33611. Continuing in a westerly direction parallel to and to the northern side of the field boundary for a distance of approximately 153 metres to exit onto the U440 road at TG 20054/33633.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Parish Meeting 18-5-10
    ASHMANHAUGH PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Annual Parish Meeting Held on 18 May 2010 in the Preston Room Present Councillors Councillor N Sharpe – Chair Councillor N Coleman – Vice Chair Councillor G Beales Councillor Mrs R Buxton Councillor T Hannant Councillor Miss S Hewitt Councillor G Saunders Officer Mrs G Sharpe - Clerk to the Council In Attendance 6 Parishioners Nigel Dixon (District and County Councillor) Alison Ball (Norfolk Rural Community Council) Kate Sullivan (North Norfolk District Council) 1 The Chair read the minutes of the Annual Parish Meeting held on 19 May 2009. They were agreed to be a true record and then signed by the Chair. 2 Annual Report by the Chair of the Parish Council The Chair read the Annual Report. The report will be published in the next edition of the Newsletter. ANNUAL REPORT 01 APRIL 2009 TO 31 MARCH 2010 For Ashmanhaugh Parish Councillors, this has been a busy year. We have continued to try to protect and promote interests of the village and react to any challenges whilst influencing and embracing the changes and opportunities which have been offered. We have attended meetings with many bodies in order to inform councillors, raise the profile of the Parish and to make the parishioners wishes heard. We have received considerable support from the Norfolk Association of Local Councils, North Norfolk District Council, our District and County Councillor – Nigel Dixon, our Member of Parliament – Norman Lamb and our Safer Neighbourhood Team. I was delighted to announce that, in January 2010, the Council was awarded Quality Status under the National Accreditation Scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • PLACES to STAY Hotels
    . PLACES TO STAY We are pleased to provide visitors to the school with a list of local accommodation from bed and breakfasts to self- catering accommodation which you may wish to consider to help you plan your visit. This is not an advertising feature. Preferential rates or offers are available where indicated by an , please advise the hotel/B&B when booking that you are visiting Gresham’s to take advantage of these. Hotels Byford’s Cliftonville Hotel, Cromer A ‘posh B&B’ located in the heart of Holt. Indulge in Edwardian Elegance on the North Norfolk Seafront. From £165 per night, including breakfast From £90 bed and breakfast +44 1263 711400 +44 1263 512543 www.byfords.org.uk www.cliftonvillehotel.co.uk [email protected] [email protected] The Dales Country House Hotel The Blakeney White Horse A peaceful country manor in nearby One of the regions foremost small hotels. Sheringham. From £130 per night From £99 per room +44 1263 824555 +44 1263 740574 www.mackenziehotels.com www.blakeneywhitehorse.co.uk [email protected] [email protected] Felbrigg Lodge The Links Country Park Hotel A quiet boutique hotel. Country Park Hotel and Golf Club. From £179 for 2 people sharing per night From £100 per night +44 1263 666 010 +44 1263 838383 www.felbrigglodge.co.uk www.links-hotel.co.uk [email protected] [email protected] The Sea Marge Hotel The Pheasant Hotel Luxurious family hotel. Located in Kelling, 5 minutes’ drive from Greshams School. From £130 per night From £190 per night (B&B) +44 1263 579579 + 44 1263 588382 www.seamargehotel.co.uk www.pheasanthotelnorfolk.co.uk [email protected] [email protected] The Stiffkey Red Lion The Crown Hotel “An old English inn…with the comfort of a An elegant hotel in nearby Wells-next-the-sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office
    Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office This list summarises the Norfolk Record Office’s (NRO’s) holdings of parish (Church of England) registers and of transcripts and other copies of them. Parish Registers The NRO holds registers of baptisms, marriages, burials and banns of marriage for most parishes in the Diocese of Norwich (including Suffolk parishes in and near Lowestoft in the deanery of Lothingland) and part of the Diocese of Ely in south-west Norfolk (parishes in the deanery of Fincham and Feltwell). Some Norfolk parish records remain in the churches, especially more recent registers, which may be still in use. In the extreme west of the county, records for parishes in the deanery of Wisbech Lynn Marshland are deposited in the Wisbech and Fenland Museum, whilst Welney parish records are at the Cambridgeshire Record Office. The covering dates of registers in the following list do not conceal any gaps of more than ten years; for the populous urban parishes (such as Great Yarmouth) smaller gaps are indicated. Whenever microfiche or microfilm copies are available they must be used in place of the original registers, some of which are unfit for production. A few parish registers have been digitally photographed and the images are available on computers in the NRO's searchroom. The digital images were produced as a result of partnership projects with other groups and organizations, so we are not able to supply copies of whole registers (either as hard copies or on CD or in any other digital format), although in most cases we have permission to provide printout copies of individual entries.
    [Show full text]