DOCSLIB.ORG

Kenya Forest Service (KFS) in Ensuring the Sustainability of the Mapping Programme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kenya Forest Service (KFS) in Ensuring the Sustainability of the Mapping Programme Republic of Kenya Ministry of Environment and Forestry The National Forest Reference Level for REDD+ Implementation August 2020 FOREWORD Kenya is committed to participate in the Global climate change mitigation actions. We have submitted our Nationally Determined Contributions targets which aim to reduce National emissions by 30% and are in the process of updating our NDC based on current national circumstances. We have identified the forest sector as the main source of emission reductions with the hope of converting it from its current status of being a net emitter into a net sink. Guided by our Vision 2030 target of a minimum10% forest cover, Kenya has embarked on a number of forest restoration activities including committing to plant 5,000,000 trees under the Bonn Challenge and identification of an area of 5.1 million ha that has potential for tree based restoration. Our commitment to participate in REDD+ is beyond doubt. After developing the REDD+ Proposal in the year 2012, we noted a need to enhance stakeholder involvement in the REDD+ process which slowed our submission of the relevant documents. Today we are in the process of developing the relevant tools required for REDD+ namely the National REDD+ Strategy (NRS), the Safeguard Information System (SIS), The National Forest Monitoring System (NFMS) and now submitted the Forest Reference Level (FRL). The submission of this FRL is evidence enough that Kenya has capacity and is committed to monitor its forest resources which not only supports international reporting but is important for our national and local decision making processes. We note in this report some technological and data limitations but hope that a stepwise improvement programme will enhance the accuracy of our reporting and avail time series information that will inform policy implementation in the conservation of forests, natural resources and Climate change action plans. The submission of this FRL sets the pace for Kenya to finalise on the other REDD+ related documents in readiness to participate in results based payment programmes as described by the Warsaw Framework on REDD+ DR. CHRIS K. KIPTOO, CBS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTRY i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to appreciate the efforts that have been put towards the development of this document. Firstly I appreciate the support provided by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) under the Capacity Development Project for Sustainable Forest Management in the Republic of Kenya. This is the project that has sourced information and analysed data used to develop the FRL, and organized Technical Working Group meetings to review and improve the FRL document. Complementary to this, the System for Land based Emission Estimation for Kenya (SLEEK), housed at the Ministry of Environment and Forestry has mobilized resources to support development of a time series data set of land cover maps which provided land cover change information for this report. Specifically I appreciate the working relationship created by the Department of Resource Surveys and Remote Sensing (DRSRS) and the Kenya Forest Service (KFS) in ensuring the sustainability of the Mapping programme. I appreciate the coordination and guidance provided by the Climate Change Response and REDD+ Coordination office of the Kenya Forest Service who engaged international experts (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, The Mullion Group, the Green House Gas Management Institute and The Coalition of Rainforest Nations) to provide comments and guidance. I also note the active participation of members from various institutions who have supported the completion of this assignment. Specifically I note the participation of Karatina University, Dedan Kimathi University, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, the Department of Resource Surveys and Remote Sensing, Kenya Forest Service, Conservation International, The Regional Centre for Mapping Resources for Development and the Ministry of Agriculture. I also appreciate the support of the stakeholder team that put the Technical team on its toes ensuring that the final product describes Kenya’s historical emissions With this kind of collaboration, I believe that we can enhance the conservation and monitoring of our forest resources in Kenya. ALFRED N. GICHU, HEAD: DIRECTORATE OF FOREST CONSERVATION; NATIONAL REDD+ COORDINATOR & FOCAL POINT, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTRY. ii THE FRL TECHNICAL TEAM Government officers 1. Alfred Gichu - Director of Forest Conservation (Ministry of Environment & Forestry) and National REDD+ Coordinator & Focal Point 2. Peter Nduati – Kenya Forest Service and Project Manager responsible for REDD+ Readiness (CADEP-SFM) 3. Faith Mukabi – Kenya Forest Service (Forest Information Systems) 4. George Tarus – Kenya Forest Service (Climate Change & Response Office) 5. Peter Sirayo – Kenya Forest Service (CADEP – SFM) 6. Mercyline Ojwala Department of Resource Surveys and Remote Sensing Technical Support 1. Kazuhisha Kato – JICA (Team leader REDD+ Readiness Component of CADEP-SFM) 2. Sato Kei - JICA (Remote Sensing Expert REDD+ Readiness Component of CADEP-SFM) 3. Yoshihiko Sato - JICA (Forest Expert REDD+ Readiness Component of CADEP-SFM) 4. Kazuhiro Yamashita - JICA (Former Forest Expert REDD+ Readiness Component of CADEP-SFM) 5. Mwangi Kinyanjui –Karatina University, Kenya(Forest Expert) iii TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................................ i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................. ii THE FRL TECHNICAL TEAM ......................................................................................................... iii TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................ viii LIST OF ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................................... ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. xi 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Relevance .....................................................................................................................1 1.2. The National Context .................................................................................................1 1.2.1. Country Profile ....................................................................................................1 1.2.2. The Forest Sector ................................................................................................3 1.3. REDD+ in Kenya ........................................................................................................4 2. THE FOREST REFERENCE LEVEL ............................................................................................. 6 2.1. Objectives of developing a National FRL ......................................................................6 2.2. The Building Blocks of the Forest Reference Level ......................................................6 2.2.1. Forest definition........................................................................................................6 2.2.2. Identification of REDD+ Activities ..........................................................................7 2.2.3. Carbon pools ..............................................................................................................9 2.2.4. Scale .........................................................................................................................10 2.2.5. Green House Gases (GHG) ....................................................................................10 2.3. Selection of Reference Period .......................................................................................10 2.3.1. Aligning Reference period to changes in the Forest Sector .................................12 2.3.2. Selecting a Reference period based on mapping tools .........................................12 3. ACTIVITY DATA AND EMISSION FACTORS .......................................................................... 14 3.1. Activity data ...................................................................................................................14 3.1.1. Kenya’s Land Cover mapping programme ......................................................14 3.1.2. Stratification of forests ...........................................................................................16 3.1.2. Mapping land use transitions ..........................................................................20 3.1.3. Assigning Activity Data to REDD+ Activities .................................................21 3.1.4. Land cover change areas between years .........................................................23 3.1.5. Transitions of forests based on land cover change matrices ..........................23 3.1.6. Annual and percentage areas of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DAYS in the COLD: KHRC's Report Into the Embobut Forest Evictions
    DAYS IN THE COLD 2014 Report into the Embobut Forest Evictions The report unravels the surroundings leading to forceful evictions witnessed in “Embobut with the aim of identifying the forces and causes of the eviction, find out“ the state, nature and extent of human rights violations as well as to determine the humanitarian assistance situation on the ground. ii DAYS IN THE COLD: KHRC’s Report into the Embobut Forest Evictions iii DAYS IN THE COLD: KHRC’s Report into the Embobut Forest Evictions DAYS IN THE COLD: KHRC’s Report into the Embobut Forest Evictions iv Acronyms…..................................................................................................................................vi Glossary of terms…...................................................................................................................viii Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................................ix Foreword…....................................................................................................................................x Executive Summary….................................................................................................................xi Kenya’s History of forest evictions….......................................................................................xi Chapter One: …............................................................................................................................1 Introduction…...................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Public Forest Agencies in Strengthening SMFE and Producer
    XIV WORLD FORESTRY CONGRESS, Durban, South Africa, 7-11 September 2015 The role of public forest agencies in strengthening forest and farm producer organizations in developing countries: Results of a self-assessment with the Kenya Forest Service Marco Boscolo (FAO), Oscar Simanto (KFS)2, Philip Kisoyan (FFF Kenya)3, Jhony Zapata (FAO/FFF)4 Duncan McQueen (IIED)5 Abstract A number of FAO activities target Small and Medium Forest Enterprises (SMFE) and forest and farm producer organizations (POs). Some of these activities focus directly on POs, for example through capacity development interventions. Other activities focus on creating or strengthening cross-sectoral and multi-stakeholder platforms for dialogue. A third set of activities focus on improving the “enabling environment” for POs, for example by improving clarity of resources tenure. An often neglected area of support is in strengthening public forest institutions (PFI) as key element of the “enabling environment” for POs (see FAO’s policy brief on strengthening public forestry institutions, and FAO/FFF working paper “Making Change Happen”). In fact, their mandate often includes improvements of livelihood for the rural poor or support to small forestry producers and community forestry. The modalities by which this support is provided are rather mixed and range from providing extension services, facilitating PES schemes, administering incentives programs, maintaining nurseries, etc. However, the impact of their support to POs is rather mixed. In some cases, they are perceived as hindering POs development while in other cases they are a critical element of success. Anecdotally, the countries that have made more progress in supporting SMFE and POs have embraced a stronger “result orientation”.
    [Show full text]
  • Taskforce Report on Forest Resources Management and Logging Activities in Kenya
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTRY Taskforce Report on Forest Resources Management and Logging Activities in Kenya April 2018 REPUBLIC OF KENYA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTRY Taskforce Report on Forest Resources Management and Logging Activities in Kenya April 2018 TASKFORCE TO INQUIRE INTO FOREST RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND LOGGING ACTIVITIES IN KENYA The Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Environment and Forestry NIHF Building 12th Floor NAIROBI 30th April 2018 Cabinet Secretary, This Taskforce was appointed through Gazette Notice No. 28 dated 26 February 2018 to look into the Forest Resources Management and Logging Activities in Kenya. We were launched on 5th March 2018 by His Excellency the Deputy President, whereupon we embarked on our work immediately. We have now completed our work and have the honour to present to you our Report, which contains our findings and recommendations on Sustainable Management of Forest Resources in Kenya. We take this opportunity to thank you for the honour and trust you placed on us. We also wish to express our continued loyalty and highest esteem to the people and the Government of Kenya. Yours Taskforce to inquire into Forest Resources Management and Logging Activities in Kenya 1 Taskforce Report on Forest Resources Management and Logging Activities in Kenya 1 NAME POSITION SIGNATURE 1. Mrs Marion Wakanyi Kamau Chairperson 2. Ms Linda Chepkorir Ruto Munyao Member 3. Ms. Phyllis Wakiaga Member 4. Mr Christian Lambrecht Member 5. Dr Isaac P. Kalua, CBS Member 6. Mr Duncan M. Kimani Member 7. Mr Ernest Nakenya Nadome Member 8. Mr Adil Arshed Khawaja Member 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya Water Towers , Forests and Green
    REPORT OF THE HIGH-LEVEL NATIONAL DIALOGUE ON KENYA WATER TOWERS, FORESTS AND GREEN ECONOMY 5-7 NOVEMBER 2012 Introduction The First Kenya Water Towers, Forests and Green Economy National Dialogue was held from 5-7 November 2012, in Nairobi, Kenya. The dialogue was organized jointly by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Kenya’s Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife. It was held as part of Kenya’s follow-up to the outcome of the UN Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20 Conference) “The Future We Want” and also as part of the Government of Kenya’s efforts to implement its Vision 2030 (2008-2030), which has the objective of helping to transform Kenya into a “middle-income country providing a high quality life to all its citizens by the year 2030.” The three days brought together more than 200 key decision-makers from Kenya, including from 12 ministries and government agencies, the private sector, development partners, civil society and media, as well as international observers. The purpose of the dialogue was to raise awareness of the socio-economic role of water towers and forests in the Kenyan economy and identify the enabling conditions for delivering long-term investments in sustainable forest management. The dialogue also aimed to consider how to capture finance and investment opportunities relating to Vision 2030 and the green economy. This report summarizes the presentations made, and discussions undertaken, during the three days of the dialogue. 1 Report of the Meeting The Kenya Water Towers, Forest and Green Economy National Dialogue included opening and closing high-level segments, technical sessions, and a press conference on water towers and the role and contribution of mountain forests to the Kenyan economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Management and Conservation in Kenya: a Study of the Role of Law in the Conservation of Forest Resources
    FOREST MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION IN KENYA: A STUDY OF THE ROLE OF LAW IN THE CONSERVATION OF FOREST RESOURCES by JOHN KIPKOECH CHEBII submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF LAWS at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: PROF W. BRAY CO-SUPERVISOR: PROF F.D. P. SITUMA NOVEMBER 2015 CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND 1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT 1.3 PURPOSES OF THE STUDY 1.4 CONCEPTUAL CLARIFICATION 1.4.1 FORESTS 1.4.2 MANAGEMENT 1.4.3 CONSERVATION 1.4.4 PRESERVATION 1.4.5 PROTECTION 1.4.6 INTERGENERATIONAL EQUITY 1.4.7 INTRAGENERATIONAL EQUITY 1.4.8 THE ROLE OF LAW IN THE SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION OF FOREST RESOURCES 1.5 LITERATURE REVIEW 1.6 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 1.7 FRAMEWORK OF THE THESIS 1.8 SUMMARY 1.1 BACKGROUND Forests form part of our most precious natural resources. They are essential to the continued balance and survival of the world’s ecosystem.1 Unfortunately, they have suffered from serious depletion in the past and unless vigorous steps are taken to conserve them, their future existence is threatened.2 Illustrative of the concern which the international community has in relation to this threat is the following extract from the report of the World Commission on Environment and Development which stresses the importance of forests for the conservation of biological diversity and ecological processes: The link between conservation and development and the need to attack the problem at source can be seen clearly in the case of tropical forests. Sometimes it is government policy, not economic necessity that drives the over exploitation and destruction of these resources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coastal Forests of Kenya
    The Coastal Forests of Kenya Forests data, threats, socio-economic issues, values, stakeholders, challenges, strategies, investment and enabling environment A national synthesis report for the development of the WWF-EARPO Eastern Africa Coastal Forests Ecoregion Programme By Paul Matiku (M.Phil), Executive Director, Nature Kenya P.O Box 44486, 00100, Nairobi, Tel: 3749957, fax: 3749957 e-mail: [email protected] 1 Table of contents 1. Introduction....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Description of Coastal Forests.......................................................................... 2 2.1 Data on coastal Forests...............................................................................................................................................2 2.2 Coastal forests protection status and management ....................................................................................................2 2.3 Physiography/form/canopy structure, dominant species, etc. of main blocks/forests.............................................3 2.4 Main goods and services from main forest blocks ....................................................................................................3 2.4.1 Local values: .....................................................................................................................................................4 2.4.2 National level values.........................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya RPP Annex
    REDD READINESS PREPARATION PROPOSAL KENYA Annexes to R-PP 1 R-PP Annexes Table of Contents Annex 1b-1. Consultation and Participation I Information 1 Annex 1b-2. Consultation and Participation Workshops 3 Annex 1b-3. KFS REDD+ website 4 Annex 2a-1. Assessment of land use and forest policy and governance in the forest sector in Kenya 5 Annex 2a-2. List of on-going programs supporting the forestry sector in Kenya 28 Annex 2a-3. Ongoing climate change and REDD+ related projects being implemented in Kenya 30 Annex 3-1. Background Information for the Reference Scenario 37 Annex 3-2. Institutional coordination for developing the REL 38 Annex 3-3. Proposed institutional roles and responsibilities and their capacity and technology needs 38 Annex 3-4. Aerial Photography Coverage for Kenya 39 Annex 3-5. Remote sensing data in-house for Kenya 40 Annex 3-6. Sub-steps for estimating activity data for REL 41 Annex 3-7. Sub-steps for estimating emission/removal factors 42 Annex 4 – Developing a MRV system 45 2 Annex 1b-1. Consultation and Participation I Information Locations of Regional Workshops Western, Nyanza and North Rift (Western Block). The rationale for clustering these three conservancies together was that they all consist of representative ecological areas in the country but are all in close proximity to one another: two water towers (Mt. Elgon and Cherangani Hills), an important tropical rainforest(Kakamega forest) and arid and semi-arid areas (Baringo, West Pokot and Turkana). The Western Block also comprises a very diverse set of stakeholders, all with different interests in concepts such as REDD+.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Resource Management and Logging Activities in Kenya
    PMWL Research Result Forest Resource Management and Logging Activities in Kenya Access to new resource related to solving global environmental problems added to PMWL Resource provided by Daisy Ogutu 26 March 2020 – Kisumu, Kenya – Access to a new resource has been added to the PM World Library (PMWL) related to solving global environmental problems. The new resource is titled: Taskforce report on forest resource management and logging activities in Kenya, by the Republic of Kenya’s ministry of environment and forestry and published in The Forest Report in April 2018. The forest sector in Kenya contributes about Kshs. 7 billion to the economy and provides a lot of employment opportunities. Most of the country’s economic sectors rely on environment-based resources for their sustenance. Being the country’s water towers, forests ensure adequate quality and quantity of water and are also sinks of greenhouse gases which contribute to climate change mitigation. The global recommended minimum forest cover for a country is 10% while Kenya’s is estimated to be at 7.4%. Depletion of forest cover in the country is alarming and if not addressed urgently, it has the potential to rollback strides towards the attainment of Vision 2030 and the government’s Big Four Agenda. The Kenya Forest Service (KFS) is the lead agency in the management of forests in the country. Over the past 25 years, there has been massive destruction of forests due to excision, settlements established without following due process, encroachment, illegal logging and unsustainable grazing. It is estimated that 1.6 million tons of charcoal are produced in Kenya annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Un-Redd Unep Pro Gramme Republic of Kenya
    UN-REDD UNEP PRO GRAMME REPUBLIC OF KENYA The Role and Contribution of Montane Forests and Related Ecosystem Services to the Kenyan Economy Published by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), February 2012 Copyright © UNEP 2012 ISBN: 978-92-807-3273-3 Job Number: DEW/1541/NA Reproduction This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non- profit services without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, DCPI, UNEP, P. O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. The use of information from this document for publicity or advertising is not permitted. Disclaimers Mention of a commercial company or product in this document does not imply endorsement by UNEP. Trademark names and symbols are used in an editorial fashion with no intention on infringement on trademark or copyright laws. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. We regret any errors or omissions that may have been unwittingly made.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Plan 2017
    STRATEGIC PLAN 2017 - 2022 i FOREST COVER MAP ii Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................... i Acronyms. .............................................................................................................................................. iii Technical Forest Definitions .................................................................................................................. iv Foreword ................................................................................................................................................ iv Preface ................................................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ v CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 7 1.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. Mandate and Functions of the Kenya Forest Service ........................................................ 7 Mandate ......................................................................................................................................... 7 The Functions of the Service are;-
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Forest Plantations: Policies and Progress
    Chapter 5 Forest Plantations: Policies and Progress Logging in the Tropics is commonly followed by defores- 15-year rotation as an example, he concluded that em- tation and agriculture that degrade the soil, precluding ployment is nearly 5 times greater in forest plantations subsequent continuous cultivation or pasturing. Agricul- than in pasture production, and yet the forest may be ture persists on the best sites, leaving the poorer ones to grown on poorer soils. return to forests. Of these, the best may be suitable for forest plantations. Two valuable references on forest plantations in the Trop- ics are available. Evans (1992) emphasizes the planning The growing need for plantations was recognized de- of plantations, taking into account social and economic cades ago by Champion (1949). He pointed out that factors and describing practices from establishment to there are many millions of hectares of land that should harvest. Zobel and others (1987) clarify misunderstand- be afforested as soon as possible for society's benefit. He ings concerning exotic species and document the high further stated that although the technology to restore yields attainable through plantation tree improvement. forests may be based on incomplete understanding of the underlying principles, the work must proceed in the light TheCase for Planting of existing experience. His plea is still valid. The case for planting rests partly on land availability and foreseen timber shortages. One analysis concluded that The ultimate extent of forest plantations in the Tropics plantations are needed where: (1) natural forest area is will be determined by the degree to which they can inadequate, (2) natural forests grow too slowly to meet compete with other land uses, meet growing demands bulk forest-product demands on a sustained-yield basis, for wood, outproduce alternative wood sources, and (3) natural forests are too scattered to permit economical _) protect the environment for future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Increasing Financing for Sustainable Landscapes and Climate Adaptation in Madagascar Alan Miller (Ceadir) and Dr
    OPPORTUNITIES FOR INCREASING FINANCING FOR SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPES AND CLIMATE ADAPTATION IN MADAGASCAR ALAN MILLER (CEADIR) AND DR. ERIC HYMAN (USAID) OCTOBER 2019 USAID supports sustainable landscapes, biodiversity, and climate adaptation training and technical assistance, planning, financing, and implementation in Madagascar from impact investors and sustainable development funds Photo credit: Eric Hyman, USAID Madagascar, the world’s fifth largest island, is a hotspot of The Government of Madagascar has prepared a national unique and highly threatened biodiversity. Approximately plan for REDD+ financing to reduce deforestation and 90 percent of its plant and animal species are endemic, forest degradation and promote forest conservation, existing nowhere else in the world. Madagascar lost 44 sustainable forest management, and enhancement of forest percent of its natural forest cover in the 60 years between carbon stocks. It has also submitted forest reference level 1953 and 2014. The deforestation rate increased to 1.1 (baseline) data.4 The national REDD+ plan focuses on percent per year between 2010 and 2014. Much of the preserving the carbon-rich moist forests with the best remaining natural forest is highly fragmented, with 46 prospects for carbon credits. However, it does not address percent less than 100 meters from a cleared or open area. the lower carbon dry and spiny forests that are home to Natural forests now cover only 15 percent of the national many rare and endemic plant and animal species. territory. About 50 percent of the remaining area is tropical moist forest, 29 percent is dry forest, 19 percent is spiny forest, and 2 percent is mangroves. Madagascar also has an extensive area of coral reefs.1 Madagascar has many development challenges: the poverty rate is 71 percent and illiteracy is 70 percent.
    [Show full text]