16A.4 Polarimetric Classification of Winter Weather Precipitation Type Using Thermodynamic Input from Numerical Models

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

16A.4 Polarimetric Classification of Winter Weather Precipitation Type Using Thermodynamic Input from Numerical Models 16A.4 POLARIMETRIC CLASSIFICATION OF WINTER WEATHER PRECIPITATION TYPE USING THERMODYNAMIC INPUT FROM NUMERICAL MODELS Terry J. Schuur, Alexander V. Ryzhkov, and Heather D. Reeves Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma and NOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory 1. INTRODUCTION related to the generation of supercooled liquid water (Hogan et al. 2002), 4) regions The classification of cold-season of high ZDR and KDP that are believed to be precipitation type at the surface is associated with dendritic growth and/or ice complicated by the broad range of crystal generation (Moisseev et al. 2008; precipitation types that might result from Andric et al. 2009; Kennedy and Rutledge processes that occur below the height of the 2011), and 5) an apparent tendency for ZDR radar’s lowest elevation sweep. For in the snow region to increase upon the example, a deep layer of subfreezing air onset of storm decay as regions of dry, near the surface might lead to either a aggregated snow (characterized by low ZDR) complete refreezing of drops (ice pellets) or are replaced by pristine ice crystals refreezing upon contact with the surface (characterized by high ZDR). (freezing rain). Both of these precipitation In this study, we present results from the types are difficult to determine using radar continued evolution of a polarimetric data alone. Existing classification schemes, classification algorithm that is designed to such as the polarimetric Hydrometeor take advantage of thermodynamic output Classification Algorithm (HCA, Park et al. from a numerical model in the classification 2009) currently being deployed on the WSR- process. An earlier version of the algorithm 88D network, also do not take full advantage described by Schuur et al. (2011) has been of observations made at several elevation modified to use output from the High- angles. This effectively eliminates the Resolution Rapid-Refresh (HRRR) model. possibility of observations made aloft to be In addition to providing more information to used in the classification process. An aid in the interpretation of polarimetric example of such signatures is summarized signatures, the thermodynamic information by Ryzhkov et al. (2011), who report on provides a mechanism to produce surface- recent observational work to identify based classification results at distant ranges repetitive polarimetric signatures associated from the radar, where low-level layers of with microphysical processes in winter warm/cold air that fall well below the lowest storms. Analyses of numerous case studies available radar data might result in revealed signatures such as 1) a low-level microphysical processes that would enhancement in ZDR that appears to be otherwise remain undiagnosed. The benefit related to the refreezing of melted or of adding the thermodynamic data is partially melted hydrometeors, 2) downward therefore twofold: 1) to enhance excursions of the bright band to the surface classification capabilities in regions where resulting in localized regions of heavy, wet polarimetric radar data are available, and 2) snow, 3) plumes of high ZDR associated with to extend classification capabilities to embedded updrafts and possibly also regions where it is not. The project also seeks to provide an algorithm framework Corresponding author address: Terry J. Schuur that allows ongoing observational work, as University of Oklahoma/CIMMS listed above, to be easily incorporated into National Weather Center future algorithm development with the long 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Norman, OK, 73072 term goals of improving automated E-mail: [email protected] precipitation type classification at both the surface and aloft, including the capability to across the model grid using T, Td, and p. If remotely diagnose conditions favorable for the surface wet-bulb temperature TWs > 3°C, liquid water generation. it is assumed that precipitation at the surface is rain. However, if TWs < 3°C, the vertical 2. ALGORITHM DEVELOPMENT profile of TW at that point is classified as belonging to one of the four different types The classification algorithm used in this shown in Fig. 1. H0, H1, and H2 in Fig. 1 paper is similar to that first reported on by depict the heights of the 0°C crossing points Schuur et al. (2011), except that it has been in the profiles. Making use of the studies by modified to use higher resolution model data Czys et al. (1996), Zerr (1997), and Rauber that is mapped to a radar-centric coordinate et al. (2001), the TW profiles are then used to system, thereby providing better resolution create a background classification that and improved diagnostic capabilities. The consists of six precipitation categories: 1) initial classification is performed using output snow (SN), 2) wet snow (WS), 3) freezing from the High-Resolution Rapid-Refresh rain (FR), 4) ice pellets (IP), 5) a (HRRR) model analyses, which are created combination of freezing rain and ice pellets by interpolating the 13-km grid-spaced (FR/IP), and 6) rain (RA). In this procedure, Rapid-Refresh analyses to a 3.1-km spacing the threshold for the maximum and minimum using a 16-point bi-linear interpolation acceptable TW profiles in the warm (TWmax) method. The analyses are produced every and cold (TWmin) layers, respectively, are hour by assimilating observed variables into derived from a visual inspection of the the 1-hr forecast from the previous cycle scatterplots presented by Figs. 5 and 6 of using a variational three-dimensional Zerr (1997). Following the flow chart analysis scheme. Vertical profiles of the presented in Fig. 2: wet-bulb temperature TW are calculated (a) (b) Type 1 Type 2 H H H0 TWs 0 T 0 TWs3 T (c) (d) H Type 3 H Type 4 H0 H0 TWmax H1 TWmax H1 TWmin H2 TWmin 0 0 TWs T TWs T Fig. 1. Four types of vertical profiles of wet-bulb temperature (Tw) corresponding to four or more types of precipitation. BEGIN Yes No Yes Tw profile TWs > 3°C ? SN Type 1? RA No T > 2°C T < 2°C T No T No Wmax No Wmax W W and and profile profile T > -5°C? T < -5°C? Type 2? Type 3? Wmin Wmin Yes Yes Yes Yes No 0°C < TWmax < 2°C H0 < 1 km? and TWmin < -5°C? FR IP FR/IP Yes No Yes No WS RA IP RA Fig. 2. Flow chart showing logistic for determination of precipitation types depending on vertical profile of wet bulb temperature. • When TWs > 3°C, the precipitation at the • For profile Type 4 (Fig. 1d), where TWs < surface is classified as RA. 0°C and the TW profile crosses the 0°C level two times, the precipitation at the • For profile Type 1 (Fig. 1a) where TW < surface is classified as FR if TWmax > 2°C 0°C throughout the entire depth of the and TWmin > -5°C and IP if TWmax < 2°C profile, the surface precipitation is and TWmin < -5°C. Otherwise the classified as SN. precipitation at the surface is classified as FR/IP. • For profile Type 2 (Fig. 1b), where 0° < TWs < 3°C and the TW profile crosses the Polarimetric radar data are then used to fine 0°C level one time, the precipitation at tune the initial classification by determining the surface is classified as WS if H0 < 1 whether or not it is consistent with the radar km. Otherwise, the precipitation at the observations. For example, a polarimetric surface is classified as RA. radar observation of a bright band would be inconsistent with a model-based surface • For profile Type 3 (Fig. 1c), where 0° < classification of dry snow. Radar data are TWs < 3°C and the TW profile crosses the also used to refine a precipitation type within 0°C level three times, the precipitation at a category, such as by using Z and ZDR the surface is classified as IP if 0°C < observations to discern between ice crystals TWmax < 2°C and TWmin < -5°C, where and dry snow. The algorithm outputs 9 TWmax is the maximum TW in the vertical classes of hydrometeors: crystals (CR), dry profile and TWmin is the minimum TW in snow (DS), wet snow (WS), ice pellets/sleet the vertical profile. Otherwise the (IP), freezing rain (FR), a mix of freezing rain precipitation is classified as RA. and ice pellets (FR/IP), rain (RA), heavy rain (HR), and hail (HA). 3. CASE STUDY EXAMPLES (FR/IP and IP categories, see Fig. 3e) also both indicate that this broad region had In this section, we examine algorithm conditions favorable towards the generation output for 3 winter storm events sampled by of ice pellets and/or a ice pellet/freezing rain the OU-PRIME radar on December 24, mix. It should also be noted that the 2009, January 28, 2010, and February 1, algorithm output also indicates that the 2011. In total, 31 volumes of radar data region of ice pellets had a “branch” that (corresponding to 31 hourly HRRR grids) extended well to the west of the OKC metro were processed for these 3 events. area. The radar modification of the Reconstructed RHIs of polarimetric variables background classification, as shown by Fig. with HRRR TW fields overlaid were then 3f, indicates that small pockets of low ρHV at produced for every 5° of azimuth. Here we the western periphery of this ice pellet show classification results and reconstructed region were reclassified to be wet snow. RHIs for each of the 3 winter events to Future work will need to include more illustrate current algorithm analysis and focused efforts to collect information on classification capabilities. In particular, we precipitation type in an attempt to better focus on some of the precipitation features validate these types of features in the that are summarized by Ryzhkov et al.
Recommended publications
  • NEWSLETTER National Weather No
    NEWSLETTER National Weather No. 08 – 9 September 2008 Association 33rd NWA Annual Meeting: Where You Need to Be! Louisville, Ky., Oct. 11 - 16 An Enchanted Monday Night Spend the evening on an Ohio River Cruise — step aboard the 93-year-old Belle of Louisville paddle wheel river Inside This Edition boat as she hosts our meeting’s ice Annual Meeting ...........................1 breaker! This grand event is sponsored by Midland Radio, Baron Services, President’s Message ......................1 Vaisala, Inc., Weatherbug, and the NWA. Scholarship Winners ................... 2 www.belleoflouisville.org New NWA Corporate Members ... 2 Our River Cruise Sponsors Membership Special .................... 2 www.baronservices.com The NOAA Hazardous Weather www.midlandradio.com Testbed ........................................ 4 www.vaisala.com http://weather.weatherbug.com/about-us.html Professional Development Opportunities ................................7 7th Annual NWA Scholarship Golf Outing Shawnee Golf Course; Saturday, Oct. 11 (details on back ) Scholarship Golf Outing .............. 8 www.shawneegolfcourse.com/golf/proto/playshawneegolf/ Dates 2 Remember ........................8 Don’t Get Stranded: Reserve an Airport Shuttle to the Hotel Sandollar Limousine Service www.sandollarlimo.com/AirportShuttle.htm President’s Message: Join in on the Excitement! The 33rd Annual Meeting of the National Weather Association is upon us, literally and figuratively. The excitement is building at NWA World Headquarters and apparently for many of you as evidenced by the record number of submitted abstracts. NWA Executive Director Steve Harned tells me all available rooms at the Galt House were sold out in anticipation of our October gathering. The vision I offered nine months ago of an annual meeting designed to improve the future of operational forecasting through discussion and analysis of historical weather events is a reality thanks to the Herculean efforts of the Annual Program Committee chaired by John Gordon (NWS MIC in Louisville).
    [Show full text]
  • Top Things to Do in Norman
    An Insider’s Guide to Visiting Norman, Oklahoma For free maps, visitor's guides, help with accommodations, lots of good advice on the area: Norman Convention and Visitors Bureau Most bold listings below contain Norman Ranked 6th Best Place to live links to web pages! Check Live to live in in the U.S. by Money Magazine, 2008 Our favorite things to do in Norman/Oklahoma City Stroll around the OU Campus! National Weather Center (public tours M,W,F 1 p.m.) Includes NOAA’s Storm Prediction Center, the Norman National Weather Service Forecast Office, National Severe Storms Laboratory, University of Oklahoma School of Meteorology, the NWC observation deck, classroom and laboratory facilities. Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History The largest university-based museum in the country, this 50,000-square-foot museum features five outstanding galleries that depict more than 300 million years of Oklahoma's natural history. Fred Jones Jr. Museum of Art “The Fred,” 555 Elm Ave. Located right across the street from Catlett Music Center and the Music Practice Building! The Weitzenhoffer Collection in the Museum includes works by such artists as Degas, Gauguin, Monet, Pissarro, Renoir, Toulouse- Lautrec, Van Gogh, Vuillard, and others. Not to be missed, and right across the street from Catlett! Oklahoma City Art Museum Largest Dale Chihuly glass exhibit in the world – truly exceptional. Suggest checking out the excellent food in the Museum Cafe before or after your visit. Oklahoma City National Memorial and Museum (bombing memorial) 620 N. Harvey Ave., Oklahoma City Bricktown Entertainment District, Great restaurants, entertainment venues and ride the Bricktown water taxis on the canal in historic downtown Oklahoma City Some Norman restaurants we enjoy: Benvenuti’s, 105 W.
    [Show full text]
  • July 12, 2012
    July 12, 2012 Fiscal Year 2013 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TRAINING AND EDUCATION (7/12/12) 1 Table of Contents Section/Title Page 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 2. Plan Actuals/Assumptions .................................................................................................. 3 3. Appendices ........................................................................................................................... 3 Appendices Appendix 1: OCWWS Training Division (OS6) Activities – Table 1 ...................................................... 4 I. OS6 Managed Training .................................................................................................................. 4 II. OS6 Infrastructure .......................................................................................................................... 4 Appendix 2: NWS Training Center – Table 2 .......................................................................................... 5 I. In-Residence Training ..................................................................................................................... 5 II. Distance Learning Training Development / Delivery ................................................................... 5 III. NWSTC Infrastructure ................................................................................................................... 6 Appendix 3: Warning Decision Training
    [Show full text]
  • Climate, Water, Weather
    Aware is published by NOAA’s National Weather Service to enhance communications within the Agency and with the emergency management community. Aware Volume 4, October 2007 Climate, Water, Weather Reaching Out to Our Emergency Management Partners Inside By Ken Graham, OCWWS Integrated Services Director [email protected] Aware As I write this from the National Emergency Management Association (NEMA) conference in Oklahoma City, I reflect on some common themes from the state directors. The partnership between the emergency managers and NWS not only 2 Digital Services continues strong, but continues to grow. With technology advancing at what seems the speed of light, availability of 3 Disaster products containing weather information has grown exponentially. Emergency Management managers are receiving volumes of information on the Internet, ranging from traditional text products to impact hazard graphics. 5 Dissemination In presentations and conversations here at NEMA, it is clear our partners need us to shift our emphasis from products to services. Our partners need 10 Fire Weather products that tie a plethora of information together into a package they can 11 Flood Awareness/ easily use. Emergency Operation Center (EOC) support requires impact services Hydrology that communicate climate, water and weather impacts from NWS offices, at the EOC or at the scene of the disaster. 12 Hurricane Several state emergency management directors commented that they have Preparedness plenty of information but lack the resources to better use that information. During numerous tornado and hurricane events, I have observed at EOCs and at 13 Outreach press conferences that NWS partners need to know impacts so lifesaving decisions can be made.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborations (1H)
    NSSL Laboratory Review, Feb 17-19, 2009 Collaboration with other national and international research groups and reimbursable support from non- NOAA sponsors (1h) The following is a list or organizations that NSSL has collaborated with primarily since 2000. Details are available upon request. International Collaborations Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Canada and Germany in support of the 2000 Olympics in Sydney, Australia Central Africa – as part of African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis Central Weather Bureau, Taiwan China Meteorology Agency European Severe Storms Laboratory (ESSL) Finnish Meteorological Institute India Meteorological Department – Indian Universities of Sri Venkateswara and Science Institute of Atmospheric Physics of Chinese Academy of Sciences Japan Meteorological Agency and Kyoto, Hokkaido Universities Lanzhou University in China Latin America – as part of NOAA's Pan American Climate Studies Sounding Network (PACS- SONET), Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama MeteoFrance MeteoSwiss National Taiwan University Royal Observatory of Hong Kong University of Reading, England University of Uppsala, Sweden World Meteorological Organization, South Africa NOAA Collaborations NSSL, the Earth Systems Research Laboratory (ESRL) Physical Sciences Division (PSD) and Global Systems Division (GSD), have conducted a series of inter-laboratory workshops over the past three years. The workshops were alternately hosted by each laboratory to not only U.S. DOC/NOAA/OAR/NSSL – 8 January 2009 Page 1 NSSL Laboratory Review, Feb 17-19, 2009 discuss the science issues, but to also allow scientists to visit the other laboratories. The focus on the workshops was to educate all participants on the current research occurring within each lab, align science directions to insure no duplication of effort, and refresh relationships between scientists to encourage collaboration in new areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report of the Weather and Climate Team
    Final Report of the Weather and Climate Team Kelvin K. Droegemeier (Chairman) Kenneth C. Crawford Elbert W. (Joe) Friday James F. (Jeff) Kimpel Kathleen Miller Bill Nations Dennis O’Brien Lindy Ritz John T. Snow Jean Vieux Don Wood 13 November 2003 1 Acknowledgements The EDGE Weather and Climate Team expresses its sincere appreciation to Ms. Mary Mowdy, liaison from the Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, for her assistance and especially for maintaining an effective line of communication with the Regents’ Office and Chancellor Risser. The Team also gratefully acknowledges the guidance provided by Ms. Les Risser and Ms. Debra Stuart of the Regents’ Office, and by Ms. Terri Leyton of the Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms and Sasaki Applied Meteorology Research Institute at the University of Oklahoma. Finally, the Team expresses its sincere thanks to the citizens of Oklahoma for their valuable comments and suggestions, and to Governor Henry, for the privilege of serving on the Weather and Climate Team. 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 1. The U.S. Weather and Climate Enterprise: A Big-Picture View of a Unique Economic Development Opportunity . 7 a. Economic and Societal Aspects of Weather, Climate Variability 7 b. Participants and their Roles: A Changing Landscape . 8 c. Weather and Climate Guidance: Mitigating Loss and Creating Benefit Through Sound Decision Making . 10 d. Future Directions and Opportunities for Economic Development 11 2. Evolution and Current Status of Weather and Climate Activities in Oklahoma . 13 a. History . 13 b. Links to Industry, Benefits to Oklahomans and the World . 15 c.
    [Show full text]
  • IMPROVING QPE and VERY SHORT TERM QPF an Initiative for a Community-Wide Integrated Approach
    IMPROVING QPE AND VERY SHORT TERM QPF An Initiative for a Community-Wide Integrated Approach BY STEVEN V. VASILOFF, DONG-JUN SEO, KENNETH W. HOWARD, JIAN ZHANG, DAVID H. KITZMILLER, MARY G. MULLUSKY, WITOLD F. KRAJEWSKI, EDWARD A. BRANDES, ROBERT M. RABIN, DANIEL S. BERKOWITZ, HAROLD E. BROOKS, JOHN A. MCGINLEY, ROBERT J. KULIGOWSKI, AND BARBARA G. BROWN A multisensor applications development and evaluation system at the National Severe Storms Laboratory addresses significant gaps in both our knowledge and capabilities for accurate high-resolution precipitation estimates at the national scale. ater is a precious resource and, when ex- collectively as quantitative precipitation information cessive or in short supply, a source of many (QPI).] To meet these needs at the national scale, W hazards. It is essential to monitor and pre- accurate QPI is needed at various temporal and spatial dict water-related hazards, such as floods, droughts, scales for the entire United States, its territories, and debris flows, and water quality, and to determine immediate surrounding areas. Temporal scales current and future availability of water resources. range from minutes to several hours for flash flood Accurate quantitative precipitation estimates (QPE) prediction. QPI products can then be aggregated to and very short term quantitative precipitation fore- support longer-term applications for water supply casts (VSTQPF) provide key input to these assess- prediction. Spatial scales range from a few square ments. [QPE and VSTQPF are hereafter referred
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter from Your Norman Forecast Office for the Residents of Western and Central Oklahoma and Western North Texas
    Spring/Summer A newsletter from your Norman Forecast Office for the residents of western and central Oklahoma and western north Texas OK We Make the Difference...When it Matters Most! TX The Southern Plains Cyclone Page 1 By Alex Lamers, SCEP gusts around 45 mph, likely con- and Patrick Burke, General Forecaster tributed to the fire starts that oc- curred behind the dryline in the late morning through mid after- Dozens of wildfires rav- noon. A further increase in winds aged central and southern Okla- during the late afternoon made homa and parts of western North fires not just difficult to contain, but Texas, beginning in the morning nearly impossible to contain. Fol- on Thursday, April 9th, 2009, and lowing the dryline, a Pacific cold A graphi-cast issued from NWS Norman during the height of the wildfire outbreak on April 9, 2009. At least 15 large, uncon- continuing through the mid morn- front swept through from west to tained wildfires are revealed as dark hot spots in this infrared ing hours on Friday, April 10, east, and westerly winds in- satellite image. Meet Your Weatherman Jeff Engel Hi, I’m Jeff Engel. I am the Electronics Systems Analyst (ESA) here at the National Weather Service Forecast Office in Norman. It almost never fails that whenever I meet some- one new and tell them that I work for the National Weather Service, they ask me some sort of question about the weather forecast. At that point, I have to sort of drop my head and admit that I probably have no more of an idea about what the weather is going to do than they do, because my job has nothing to do with forecasting the A graphi-cast that appeared on the NWS Norman enhanced web page on Wednesday, April 8, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2006 OKLAHOMA CLIMATE
    OKLAHOMA CLIMATE Summer 2006 In the Heat of the Night The Drought of (An Update) 2005-06 THE CENTER OF WEATHER SCIENCE FAIR MESSAGE FROM THE EDITOR Table of Contents Bursts come in many varieties: downbursts, microbursts, cloudbursts (we called In the Heat of the Night..................................3 them “gully-washers” in the Panhandle), starbursts – both the candy and firework The Drought of 2005-06: An Update..............6 varieties, and outbursts (for you parents out there). In the past decade or so, another “burst” has come onto the scene...the heatburst. Many of you that stay Photos From the Field.....................................8 up past Leno or Letterman have probably experienced this before. After stormy weather late at night, you notice the wind howling and so you step outside, only Oklahoma is Cuckoo for CoCoRaHS............10 to get the blast-furnace effect normally reserved for mid-July afternoons. Much of southwestern and central Oklahoma was pounded by a series of heatbursts on Spring 2006 Climate Summary.......................12 May 22-23, 1996, and as luck would have it, OCS had the perfect environmental monitoring network in place to observe it...the Oklahoma Mesonet. Our historical Agriculture Weather Watch............................17 remembrance takes a look back at that strange episode, an eye-opening display Urban Farmer..................................................18 of what happens when what goes up, comes back down. Science Fair Winners.....................................19 The big story of the past nine months or so around these parts has been drought. When we hatched the idea to write a drought summary back in early May, the rain The Center of Weather..................................21 appeared to be flowing freely once again.
    [Show full text]
  • OUHSC, 271-1606 OUHSC, [email protected] OU-NORMAN
    DEPARTMENT: UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA PRINCIPAL CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY OFFICE INVESTIGATOR: ADDRESS: PHONE # HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PICK-UP REQUEST FORM INVENTORY OUHSC (FAX 271-1606) (Office 271-3000) SUPERVISOR: PHONE # OU Norman (FAX 325-7172) (Office 325-2212) EHSO Use Only DESCRIPTION OF CONTENTS SOLID/ 1. Chemical or common name and CAS# of all substances over 1% by Waste Barrel Lab Pack/DOT LIQUID/ PURE/ PRIMARY volume Date Number Hazard Code ROOM DEPT CONTAINER GAS MIXTURE HAZARD 2. Strength (concentration) of individual substance, where applicable. NUMBER CODE* NUMBER AMOUNT (S/L/G) (P/M) CODE 3. Percentages of mixed chemicals in container (by volume) Example : 301 ES 1 4 liters L M F 20% Toluene 108-88-3 80% Xylene 1330-20-7 Hazard Codes: C-Corrosive E-Explosive F-Flammable HT/C-Highly Toxic/Carcinogenic This is to certify that the above named materials are properly I-Irritant O-Oxidizer R-Reactive classified, described, packaged, marked and labeled and are in proper condition for the transportation according to the applicable *See reverse for Department Code listing requirements of the University of Oklahoma Environmental UPON COMPLETION, PLEASE: Health and Safety Office. FAX TO: EMAIL TO: OUHSC, 271-1606 OUHSC, [email protected] Signature of Authorized Department Representative EHSO USE OU-NORMAN, 325-7172 OU-NORMAN, [email protected] Pick Up Number: ______________________________ Waste Generated (in lbs.)=_______________________ DEPARTMENTAL CODES-Health Sciences Center Campus (SCC) Peggy & Charles Stephenson (AHB) Allied Health Building (SU) David L. Boren Student Union (OAC) Oklahoma Allergy Clinic Cancer Ctr (BSEB) Basic Sciences Education Building (DMEI) Dean A.
    [Show full text]
  • CIMMS Annual Report FY08
    Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies Annual Report Prepared for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research Cooperative Agreement NA16OAR4320115 Fiscal Year – 2018 1 Cover image – Example of design process from a group participating in the August 2017 Hazardous Weather Testbed workshop. Similar graphics and design elements were provided by all groups. The workshop culminated in the development of prototypes based on individual groups designs. Feedback and ideas from the participating NWS forecasters will ultimately prioritize Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) design and implementation. For more on this project, “Integration of the Geostationary Lightning Mapper with Ground-based Lightning Detection Systems for National Weather Service Operations,” led by Kristin Calhoun, Darrel Kingfield, and Tiffany Meyer (CIMMS at NSSL), see pages 344-345. 2 Table of Contents Introduction 4 General Description of CIMMS and its Core Activities 4 Management of CIMMS, including Mission and Vision Statements, and Organizational Structure 5 Executive Summary Listing of Activities during FY2018 6 Distribution of NOAA Funding by CIMMS Task and Research Theme 12 CIMMS Executive Board and Assembly of Fellows Meeting Dates and Membership 13 General Description of Task I Expenditures 15 Research Performance 16 Theme 1 – Weather Radar Research and Development 16 Theme 2 – Stormscale and Mesoscale Modeling Research and Development 137 Theme 3 – Forecast and Warning Improvements Research and Development
    [Show full text]
  • (CIMMS) Manager, US D
    RANDY ALAN PEPPLER Associate Director, NOAA Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies (CIMMS) Manager, U.S. DOE Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program Data Quality Office Instructor, University of Oklahoma Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability Updated: May 2018 ADDRESS CIMMS Geography and Environmental Sustainability 2100 National Weather Center 680 Sarkeys Energy Center 120 David L. Boren Blvd. 100 E. Boyd St. Norman, OK 73072 Norman, OK 73019 Phone: (405) 325-6667 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION ________________________________________________________________________________________ Doctor of Philosophy in Geography 2011 Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, University of Oklahoma Dissertation: Knowing Which Way the Wind Blows: Weather Observation, Belief and Practice in Native Oklahoma (excerpts published in Weather, Climate and Society, 2, 200-209; Weatherwise, 65(5), 33-39; The Chronicles of Oklahoma, 94-4, 414-431; Weather, Climate, and Society, 9, 317-329; American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 41, In Press) Master of Science in Industrial Engineering 1991 Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Non-Thesis Option Master of Science in Atmospheric Science 1982 Department of Geoscience, Purdue University Thesis: Mean State Energetics of Phases I, II, and III of GATE (excerpt published in Monthly Weather Review, 111, 359-369) Bachelor of Science with Honors in Atmospheric Science 1980 Department of Geoscience,
    [Show full text]