Reader's Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Professional Bail Agents of the United States™ (PBUS™)
Professional Bail Agents of the United States™ (PBUS™) Educational Programs PBUS™ Bail Enforcement/Fugitive Recovery Courses© - Domestic and Foreign Arrest BAIL ENFORCEMENT/FUGITIVE RECOVERY TRAINING COURSES Domestic and Foreign Arrest The Bail Enforcement/Fugitive Recovery Training Series is comprised of four courses, which will build upon each other. Domestic and foreign arrest discusses in detail the following key elements: • When the fugitive that remains in the jurisdiction in which the bail was posted; • State statues; • How to verify information and enlist the assistance of law enforcement if needed; and • Asylum states and international recovery. The student will learn how to observe and adhere to state laws, enlist the help of the Federal Government and other important aspects one must consider when hunting a fugitive outside the jurisdiction of arrest. Each jurisdiction (State, County, Country) has or should have specific laws with respect to apprehension, custody, return and transportation of a fugitive, yet some states can have virtually no regulations. Strict adherence to the specific statues will be required. At the end of this course resources are provided to assist in locating state specific laws to guide in apprehension. Domestic Arrest: Making a bail bond fugitive arrest Domestic arrest of a fugitive can take place in a variety of situations. While there is no single course that could detail each and every situation one could encounter, arrests can be routine unusual. It is crucial that one treat each and every case as though it is unusual. Obtaining significant background detail on the fugitive will provide some of the information needed. Great care must be taken to wear protective gear and have equipment in top working condition. -
Bail Bondsmen, Bounty Hunters, and the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act
University of Miami Law Review Volume 62 Number 1 Volume 62 Number 1 (October 2007) Article 3 10-1-2007 Midnight Run Re-Run: Bail Bondsmen, Bounty Hunters, and the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act Milton Hirsch Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Milton Hirsch, Midnight Run Re-Run: Bail Bondsmen, Bounty Hunters, and the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, 62 U. Miami L. Rev. 59 (2007) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol62/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Midnight Run Re-Run: Bail Bondsmen, Bounty Hunters, and the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act MILTON HIRSCH* I. INTRODUCTION "Your mother ever teach you how to react to strangers? Not shoot at 'em. Huh?"' Nobody taught Texas bail bondsmen Alberto Lopez and Thomas K. Colson, or bounty hunter George Sandoval, how to react to strangers, and not shoot at them. In November of 1984, Rudy Ojinaga was arrested in El Paso, Texas, for drunk driving and possession of marijuana.2 He posted bond in the amount of $9,500 and was released.' Lopez was his bail bondsman.4 Ojinaga returned to the home in which he resided with his parents in Central, New Mexico.5 In spring of the following -
General Management
MANAGEMENT 1.1 MISSION AND ORGANIZATION A. Proponent: Deputy Director. Phone: 202-307-9005. Fax: 703-603-7021. B. Purpose: The authority and responsibilities of the United States Marshals Service (USMS) districts, divisions, and offices, including Associate Directors, United States Marshals (USMs), Chief Deputy United States Marshals (CDUSMs), Assistant Directors, and Administrative Officers, are outlined in this directive. C. Authority: 1. The Director shall direct and supervise all activities to enable the USMS to carry out its missions and functions as set forth in 28 C.F.R. § 0.111 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 561–569. 2. The USMS is required to have an order of succession through a minimum of four positions by Department of Justice (DOJ) Order 1900.8, Justice Continuity and Occupant Emergency Program. D. Policy: 1. Mission: The offices of USM and Deputy United States Marshal (DUSM) were created under the Judiciary Act of 1789. Those occupying these offices were given extensive authority to support the federal courts within their judicial districts and to carry out all lawful orders issued by judges. Under the leadership of the Director, the United States Marshals Service (USMS) will: a. Execute federal arrest warrants under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, federal parole-violator warrants, and federal custodial and extradition warrants as directed; b. Serve all civil and criminal process issued by the federal judicial system, including the execution of lawful writs and court orders under 28 U.S.C. § 566(c). c. Provide for the health, safety, and welfare of government witnesses and their families, and issue necessary regulations for this purpose on behalf of the Attorney General (AG); d. -
Stalking Laws and Implementation Practices: a National Review for Policymakers and Practitioners
The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Stalking Laws and Implementation Practices: A National Review for Policymakers and Practitioners Author(s): Neal Miller Document No.: 197066 Date Received: October 24, 2002 Award Number: 97-WT-VX-0007 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Institute for Law and Justice 1018 Duke Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Phone: 703-684-5300 Fax: 703-739-5533 i http://www. ilj .org -- PROPERTY OF National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). t'Y- Box 6000 Rockville, MD 20849-6000 fl-- Stalking Laws and Implementation Practices: A 0 National Review for Policymakers and Practitioners Neal Miller October 2001 Prepared under a grant from the National Institute of Justice to the Institute for Law and Justice (ILJ), grant no. 97-WT-VX-0007 Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Justice or ILJ. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. -
The Fugitive Defendant's Constitutional Right to Be Pursued, 56 Brook
Fordham Law School FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History Faculty Scholarship 1991 Hare and Hounds: The uF gitive Defendant's Constitutional Right to Be Pursued Bruce A. Green Fordham University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Litigation Commons Recommended Citation Bruce A. Green, Hare and Hounds: The Fugitive Defendant's Constitutional Right to Be Pursued, 56 Brook. L. Rev. 439 (1991) Available at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/665 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "HARE AND HOUNDS": THE FUGITIVE DEFENDANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BE PURSUED United States v. Diacolios* Bruce A. Green** A true fugitive, whose location is unknown, or who is successfully re- sisting government efforts to bring him into the jurisdiction, will not be able to obtain dismissal of an indictment. This is as it should be. Otherwise, the courts would be sanctioning the playing of games by fugitives.1 [W]henever an individual has been officially accused of a crime, not only is the government charged with the burden of bringing the accused swiftly to trial, but it is under an obligation to exercise due diligence in attempting to locate and apprehend the accused, even if he is a fugitive who is fleeing prosecution 2 INTRODUCTION A criminal defendant has a constitutional right to a speedy trial. -
Alaska State Troopers Arrest Warrants
Alaska State Troopers Arrest Warrants Neutral Cyrille never serialised so remittently or personalizes any laicization overhand. Solomon advertize his Sahara burgle disparagingly or thoughtfully after Bartolemo straw and hilt finest, pinched and sequential. Overcredulous Tharen choses, his maliciousness jaundice blesses populously. Data each daily news in rajkot, troopers arrest warrants or making more than one who are considered armed vpsos from the suspects were arrested Police officers Honor our fallen Police FBI District of Alaska Juneau Alaska. Alaska Statutes AS 1225 Arrests and Citations. Boulder county tax search Stardust Superstore. After the 47-year-old man's who police discovered he left a felony warrant for vehicle and reckless endangerment and assault according to SPD. Outstanding warrants from Alaska are those directives for detention order remain unexecuted in hazard police database Although the police only arrest warrants on. State Trooper Annual fire in Alaska 61245 Avg Feb 2021. Charge Alaska man 19 shot troopers from behind. What to Do push You're Stopped by deputy Police ACLU of Alaska. If you relative to appear a pad may be issued for man arrest. Three Arrested Sunday Night In Nikiski Radio Kenai. Ukiah police booking log. Haglin then contacted state troopers who obtained an arrest criminal and accompanied him to Arvin Kangas' home child day divorce the confrontation. While divorce certificates can be obtained through the Bureau of Vital Statistics divorce certificates and catering-decrees are maintained by the Alaska Court System. Alaska Vital Records StateRecordsorg Alaska State Records. Clyde Pasterski was arrested on a felony warrant for delay to comply. Plack Road ahead as was officer attempted to serve an exchange warrant around 2 pm. -
Download Date 09/10/2021 03:07:55
Memory on trial: the manhunt for Alaska's most elusive mass murderer Item Type Thesis Authors Retherford, Brittany A. Download date 09/10/2021 03:07:55 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/4822 MEMORY ON TRIAL: THE MANHUNT FOR ALASKA’S MOST ELUSIVE MASS MURDERER A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF THE ARTS By Brittany A. Retherford, B.A. Fairbanks, Alaska December 2014 © Copyright by Brittany A. Retherford Abstract The fallibility and malleability of human memory played a confounding and troublesome role in the investigation of the 1982 murder of eight people on a fishing boat, theInvestor , in Craig, Alaska, and subsequent trials of law enforcements’ only suspect, John Kenneth Peel. Human memory — including its inherent subjectivity and susceptibility to coercion and change — ultimately resulted in an unsatisfactory resolution for victims’ families and friends, law enforcement, witnesses, and others associated with the events, investigation and legal proceed- ings. This thesis utilizes trial records, police investigation files, newspaper stories, and personal interviews to provide a summary view of the events surrounding the murders, including what is known about the murders, as well as, the subsequent investigation that led to the arrest, two civil grand juries, two jury trials, and the eventual acquittal of John Kenneth Peel. Limitations of memory are analyzed in the context of the overarching historical narrative of a booming com- mercial fishing industry and a rural justice system, including a focus on eyewitness testimony and collective memory. -
Inspection of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, Office of Investigations
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND THE BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL ISP-I-13-18 Office of Inspections February 2013 Inspection of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, Office of Investigations and Counterintelligence, Divisions of Special Investigations, Criminal Investigations, and Computer Investigations and Forensics IMPORTANT NOTICE: This report is intended solely for the official use of the Department of State or the Broadcasting Board of Governors, or any agency or organization receiving a copy directly from the Office of Inspector General. No secondary distribution may be made, in whole or in part, outside the Department of State or the Broadcasting Board of Governors, by them or by other agencies of organizations, without prior authorization by the Inspector General. Public availability of the document will be determined by the Inspector General under the U.S. Code, 5 U.S.C. 552. Improper disclosure of this report may result in criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED PURPOSE, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY OF THE INSPECTION This inspection was conducted in accordance with the Quality Standards for Inspection and Evaluation, as issued in 2011 by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, and the Inspector’s Handbook, as issued by the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of State (Department) and the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG). PURPOSE AND SCOPE The Office of Inspections provides the Secretary of State, the Chairman of the BBG, and Congress with systematic and independent evaluations of the operations of the Department and the BBG. -
FY 2021 Authorization and Budget Request to Congress
U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation FY 2021 Authorization and Budget Request to Congress February 2020 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents Page No. I. Overview……………………………………………………………………………………. 1-1 II. Summary of Program Changes…………………………………………………………... 2-1 III. Appropriations Language and Analysis of Appropriations Language……………….. 3-1 IV. Program Activity Justification…………………………………………………………... 4-1 A. Intelligence Decision Unit………………………………………………..………………… 4-1 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies B. Counterterrorism/Counterintelligence Decision Unit……………………………………... 4-12 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies C. Criminal Enterprises and Federal Crimes Decision Unit……………………………….... 4-24 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies D. Criminal Justice Services Decision Unit……………………………………………..........4-32 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies V. Program Increases by Item……………………………………………………………….. 5-1 A. Combatting Crime and Corruption…...………………………………………………….…. 5-1 B. Cyber…………………………………………………………………………………….….. 5-7 C. Data Analytics and Technical Tools…………………………………………………………5-8 D. Combatting Foreign Threats...………………………………………………………….........5-9 E. National Instant Criminal Background Check System/National Threat Operations Center. 5-10 F. Cell Site Simulator…………………………………………………………………..….…. 5-16 E. National Security Threat