DOCSLIB.ORG

1 UPPER SKAGIT Tribeаннаexhibits Before the Court Date Exhibit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 UPPER SKAGIT Tribeаннаexhibits Before the Court Date Exhibit UPPER SKAGIT TRIBE ­­ Exhibits before the Court Date Exhibit # Description Admitted 1 UPS­1 "Upper Skagit Indians, Use of WITHDRAWN Resources for Hunting, Fishing, and Plant­gathering," by June M. Collins, Ph.D. UPS­2 Copy of 91st Congressional 2d 9/12/73 Session Senate Calendar #1165, 5/4/94 (89­ Report #91­1144, p. 18 ­ 22. 3) The following exhibits were a d m i t t e d / n o t admitted/withdr awn/not offered in subproceeding #89­3 UPS­003 Kew, 1987 Forword pp ix­x in WITHDRAWN Coast Salish Essays by Wayne 5/3/94 Suttles. Seattle: University of Washington Press. UPS­004 Snyder, "Aboriginal Settlements NOT ADMITTED in the Skagit Drainage System" in 5/3/94 Cultural Resource Overview and Sample of the Skagit Wild and Scenic River. p. 19, 32, appendix. UPS­005 Suttles, 1974, "Aboriginal NOT ADMITTED Fishing Practices of the Tribes 5/3/94 forming the Modern Swinomish Community." Appendix 2, p. 5­6, 60­65. UPS­006 Collins, "The Influence of White NOT ADMITTED Contact on Class Distinctions and 5/3/94 Political Authority Among the Indians of Northern Puget Sound," p. 89­204 in Volume 2, Coast Salish and Western Washington Indians. UPS­007 Snyder, n.d., box 108, file 8. 5/4/94 LIMITED 2 UPS­008 Bureau of Indian Affairs, Family 5/3/94 Tree Number 1, Everett, Washington. UPS­009 Snyder, "Swinomish, Upper Skagit, NOT ADMITTED Sauk­Suiattle:"Inventory of 5/3/94 Native American Religious Use, p. 222. UPS­010 Snyder, n.d., fieldnotes, box 5/4/94 108, folder 7. LIMITED UPS­011 Fladmark, A Paleoecological Model NOT ADMITTED for Northwest Coast Prehistory, 5/3/94 Mercury Series, Archeological Survey of Canada, Paper No. 43, p. 50­51. UPS­012 Norton, Women and Resources of WITHDRAWN the Northwest Coast, 1985. 5/3/94 UPS­013 Collins, "John Fornsby: The NOT ADMITTED Personal Document of a Coast 5/3/94 Salish Indian." in Indians of the Urban Northwest. Edited by Marion W. Smith. Columbia University Press, 1949, p. 287­288, 291, 292, 295,302. UPS­015 Sampson, Indians of Skagit NOT ADMITTED County. Skagit County Historical 5/3/94 Series No 2. Mount Vernon, Washington, 1972, p. viii, 21­22, 24­27, 212, map. UPS­016 Hilbert, 1985 Haboo. University WITHDRAWN of Washington Press. Seattle, p. 5/3/94 xiii­xiv. UPS­018 Snyder, fieldnotes, box 108, 5/4/94 folder 6. LIMITED UPS­019 Snyder, fieldnotes, box 108, file 5/4/94 2. LIMITED UPS­020 Yarns of the Skagit Country. NOT ADMITTED Maple Lane Trailer Park, Space 5/3/94 #11, Sedro Woolley, Washington, 1974, pp. 377­379. 3 UPS­021 Synder, fieldnotes, box 109, file 5/4/94 3. LIMITED UPS­022 Williams, Sherman, Sr., Interview WITHDRAWN of November 3, 1986. 5/3/94 UPS­023 Williams, Alice, Interview of WITHDRAWN October 21, 1986. 5/3/94 UPS­024 Williams, Walter, Interview of WITHDRAWN November 3, 1986. 5/3/94 UPS­025 Collins, 1980, "Report on the use WITHDRAWN of the Skagit River, including 5/3/94 Village locations, by the Upper Skagit Indians." Pp. 2­19 in Cultural Resource Overview and Sample Survey of the Skagit Wild and Scenic River. Edited by Astrida R. Blukas Onat. Institute of Comparative Research. Seattle UPS­027 Lane, 1981, The Baker River Dams WITHDRAWN and Indian Fisheries. Prepared 5/3/94 for the Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior. Portland, Oregon. UPS­028 Composite of maps for Island 5/4/94 County vicinity. Annotated with LIMITED Indian place names and resource locations by Sally Snyder. Docket No. 294, Indian Claims Commission, Claimant's Ex. No. 4. UPS­031 Miller, Report on Upper Skagit 4/22/94 Shellfishing of the Point Elliot Treaty Period. UPS­032 Lane, Declaration of Dr. Barbara 4/22/94 Lane. UPS­033 Bob, George, 1918, Application 5/3/94 for Enrollment (Roblin) RG 75, US National Archives. 4 UPS­034 Consauk, Fr i d a y , 1 9 17, 5/3/94 Application for Enrollment (Roblin) RG 75, US National Archives. UPS­035 Lyle, Maggie, 1917, Application 5/3/94 for Enrollment (Roblin) RG 75, US National Archives. UPS­036 Williams, Johnny, 1917, 5/3/94 Application for Enrollment (Roblin) RG 75, US National Archives. UPS­037 Wilson, Jennie, 1917, Application 5/3/94 for Enrollment (Roblin) RG 75, US National Archives. UPS­038 Map, USGS 1954, Bow Quadrangle 4/22/94 N4830­W12222.5/7.5 UPS­039 Meany, 1922, Origin of Washington NOT ADMITTED Geographical Names. Washington 5/3/94 Historical Quarterly, VOl. 13, No. 1, p. 36. UPS­040 M c T a g g e r t , L e t t e r t o 5/3/94 Commissioner, July 2, 1886, RG 75, Microfilm P2011, Roll 3, Frames 0408­0808. UPS­041 Snyder, n.d., field notes 5/4/94 LIMITED UPS­042 Snyder, U.S. Coast and Geodetic 5/4/94 Survey No. 6376, Docket 233, ICC, LIMITED Exh. 3. UPS­043 Suttles, n.d. field notes 5/4/94 UPS­044 Upchurch, 1936, "The Swinomish NOT ADMITTED People and Their State". Pacific 5/3/94 Northwest Quarterly 27:283­284. UPS­045 Snyder, Testimony, Dockets 263, WITHDRAWN 294, ICC. 5/4/94 UPS­046 Upper Skagit Clam Harvest for 5/3/94 1987. (15000001) 5 UPS­048 Constitution of the Upper Skagit 4/25/94 Tribe. (15000005­15000016) UPS­049 Upper Skagit Tribe fishing 4/25/94 ordinance. (15000017­15000063) UPS­050 T r i b a l E m p l o y e e L i s t . 5/4/94 (15000076­15000080) UPS­051 Certification and Approvals for 5/4/94 Membership Rolls 1979­1990. (15000086­15000109) UPS­052 Fishing Permit list, income tax 5/4/94 statements, fireworks sales licenses. (15000110­15000175) UPS­053 Retail Sales Reporting form for 5/4/94 f i r e w o r k s c o m m i s i s o n . (15000176­15000194) UPS­054 Proclamation (15000268). 4/25/94 UPS­055 Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Bruce 4/22/94 Miller. UPS­056 Snyder, Skagit Society and its WITHDRAWN E x i s t e n t i a l B a s i s : A n 5/3/94 Ethnofolkloristic Reconstruction, 1964. UPS­057 Upper Skagit commercial salmon 4/27/94 data; ceremonial and subsistence shellfish, deer, and elk harvest data UPS­058 Upper Skagit enrollment figures; 5/3/94 ceremonial and subsistence salmon data UPS­059 A History of the Swinomish Tribal WITHDRAWN Community, by Natalie Roberts. 5/3/94 Ph.D. Dissertation, 197, pp. 73, 120. UPS­ILL­15 Upper Skagit Shellfishing in the 5/3/94 Point Elliot Treaty Period 6 UPS­ILL­16 Upper Skagit Usual and Accustomed 5/3/94 Shellfishing Areas UPS­ILL­17 Map of Midden Sites (available for inspection at the offices of Mathews, Garlington­Mathews, et al., 401 2nd Ave., #500, Seattle, WA 98104) UPS­ILL­18 Map of Midden & Ethnographic Sites (available for inspection at the offices of Mathews, Garlington­Mathews, et al, 401 2nd Ave., #500, Seattle, WA 98104) UPPER SKAGIT TRIBE EXHIBITS ­ ­ admitted in subp r o ceeding #97­2 UPS­060 Skagit System Coop (“SSC”) 1987 7/15/97 Clam Harvest List UPS­061 Letter Gibson to Smitch, 2/4/87 7/15/97 w/attachments UPS­062 Letter, Foster to Chesnin, 7/15/97 7/11/97 UPS­063 Letter, Maloney to Kinley, 7/15/97 8/24/93 UPS­064 Letter, Chesnin to Olson, 10/4/93 7/15/97 UPS­065 Draft, Interim Agreement ­­ Upper 7/15/97 Skagit and Swinomish 2/23/94, 9:53 am. UPS­066 Draft, Interim Agreement ­­ Upper 7/15/97 Skagit and Swinomish w/additional corrections, 2/23/94 7 UPS­067 Draft, Interim Agreement ­­ Upper 7/15/97 Skagit and Swinomish 2/23/94, 3:36 pm UPS­068 Draft, Interim Agreement ­­ Upper 7/15/97 Skagit and Swinomish 3/4/94 UPS­069 Draft, Interim Agreement ­­ Upper 7/15/97 Skagit and Swinomish, 3/21/94 UPS­070 Copy of Swinomish Clam Ordinance, 7/15/97 Faxed 3/24/94 UPS­071 Draft, Interim Agreement ­­ Upper 7/15/97 Skagit and Swinomish, 3/28/94, 4:41 pm UPS­072 Draft, Interim Agreement ­­ Upper 7/15/97 Skagit and Swinomish, 3/28/94, 4:53 pm UPS­073 Swinomish Crab Regulation, 6/97 7/15/97 w/map Swinomish On Reservation Crab 7/15/97 UPS­074 Fishing Map UPS­075 Swinomish Crab On Reservation 7/15/97 Regulations ­­ 1993 UPS­076 Swinomish Crab On Reservation 7/15/97 Regulations ­­ 1995 UPS­077 SSC Application for Shellfish 7/15/97 O p e r a t i o n L i c e n s e a n d Certification 1988, 1994, 1995, 1996 UPS­078 SSC Shellfish Operation License 7/15/97 and Certificate of Approval, 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995 UPS­079 Letter SSC (Gibson) to Cleland, 7/15/97 4/28/89 UPS­080 Letter SSC (Loomis) to Freeman, 7/15/97 4/16/91 8 UPS­081 Letter Freeman to Loomis (SSC), 7/15/97 4/19/91 UPS­082 Letter SSC (Loomis) to Freeman, 7/15/97 4/24/91 UPS­083 Memo Gibson to SSC Fisheries 7/15/97 Managers, 5/5/93 UPS­084 Letter SSC (Gibson) to Burge, 7/15/97 5/5/93, w/attachment UPS­085 Letter SSC (Gibson) to Wood, 7/15/97 7/28/94 w/attachment UPS­086 Letter SSC (Gibson) to Burge, 7/15/97 3/3/95 w/attachments UPS­087 Swinomish Tribal Organization 7/15/97 Chart UPS­088 Map Only Location of Commercial O F F E R E D Shellfish Opportunity in WDFW 7/15/97 Area 8 (not stipulated to by WITHDRAWN Swinomish 7/17/97 Upper Skagit 1996 Subsistence 7/15/97 UPS­089 Clam Permits UPS­090 Upper Skagit 1997 Subsistence 7/15/97 Clam Permits UPS­091 Upper Skagit Crab Permit List 7/15/97 UPS­092 Letter Schuyler to Fife Embedded 7/15/97 Shellfish Harvest Report, 6/25/97 UPS­093 Harvest Report 1996 ­ 1997 7/15/97 Embedded Shellfish (subsistence) UPS­094 Crab Tickets 1997 Commercial 7/15/97 Harvest ­­ Upper Skagit UPS­095 Historic Crab Catch Data by 7/15/97 Region UPS­096 Region 2 Upper Skagit Commercial 7/15/97 Crab Permits 9 UPS­097 Region 2 Tribal/Non­Tribal Crab 7/15/97 Harvest 1996­1997, 1997­1998 UPS­098 Letter Schuyler to Fife, 2/26/97, 7/15/97 Upper Skagit Embedded Shellfish Harvest Report, 1996 10 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mount Baker, Washington
    WATER-QUALITY EFFECTS ON BAKER LAKE OF RECENT VOLCANIC ACTIVITY AT MOUNT BAKER, WASHINGTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1022-B Prepared in cooperation with the State of Washington Department of Ecology Water-Quality Effects on Baker Lake of Recent Volcanic Activity at Mount Baker, Washington By G. C. BORTLESON, R. T. WILSON, and B. L. FOXWORTHY VOLCANIC ACTIVITY AT MOUNT BAKER, WASHINGTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1022-B Prepared in cooperation with the State of Washington Department of Ecology UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Bortleson, Gilbert Carl, 1940- Water-quality effects on Baker Lake of recent volcanic activity at Mount Baker, Washington. (Volcanic Activity at Mt. Baker) (Geologic Survey Professional Paper 1022-B) Bibliography: p. 30. Supt.ofDocs.no.: I 19.16:1022-6 1. Water quality-Washington (State)--Baker Lake. 2. Volcanism-Washington (State). 3. Baker, Mount, Wash. I. Wilson, Reed T., joint author. II. Foxworthy, Bruce, La Verne, 1925- joint author. III. Washington (State). Dept. of Ecology. IV. Title. V. Series: Volcanic activity at Mount Baker, Washington. VI. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1022-B. TD224.W2B67 363.6'1 77-21097 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03008-0 CONTENTS Conversion factors _________________________. Ill Quality of surface waters draining to Baker Lake ______B16 Abstract__________________________________. Bl Water in Sherman Crater __________________ 16 Introduction ______________________________. 1 Boulder Creek and other streams _____________.
    [Show full text]
  • CONCEPTUAL RESTORATION PLAN Baker River Alluvial Fan Enhancement
    SKAGIT COUNTY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM CONCEPTUAL RESTORATION PLAN Baker River Alluvial RESTORATION STRATEGY CONCEPT ELEMENTS 1. Increase off -channel rearing habitat by excavating a 11. Replace the existing shoreline stairway 66.6. Substitute pervious, natural-surface pedestrian channel connecting the mainstem Skagit with an off - shoreline access trails for impervious road surfaces. Fan Enhancement channel pond. 22.2. Reduce imperviousness of vehicular and pedestrian access along river banks 77.7. Provide channels to link habitats of the historic Little BACKGROUND 2. Improve instream complexity by adding large woody Baker River channel and alluvial fan as a backwater debris. 3.3. Replace invasive plant species with native trees and The Baker River Alluvial Fan area at the confl uence with 3 channel. shrubs. the larger Skagit River is located partly within the Town 3. Substitute pervious pedestrian trails for impervious 88.8. Provide low-impact recreational improvements such of Concrete and partly in unincorporated Skagit County. vehicular access road and parking areas where feasible 44. Improve the existing WDFW boat launch site as campgrounds outside the fl oodway. For more than a decade, various stakeholders including in areas adjacent to the Baker and Skagit Rivers. user groups, landowners, local governments, and other 55.5. Improve sinuosity of lower Baker River, establish 99.9. Place boulders, log structures, and/or engineered log interested parties have been considering habitat and 4. Remove invasive plant species and replace them with fl oodplain benches and meanders. jams to increase low-fl ow complexity and improve recreational improvement opportunities along the lower native trees and shrubs to provide riparian functions salmonid fi sh habitat for juvenile rearing and adult Baker River and its associated alluvial fan.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Record of Fish Related Issues on the Skagit River
    HISTORICAL RECORD OF FISH RELATED ISSUES ON THE SKAGIT RIVER SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1897 THROUGH 1969 By Larry Kunzler June 4, 2005 Updated and republished June 2008 www.skagitriverhistory.com Historical Record of Fish Related Issues On The Skagit River Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ 2 PREFACE....................................................................................................................................... 4 Levees and Fish Discussed Early in Skagit History ....................................................................... 5 Flood Control Projects Impacted Fish Runs ................................................................................... 5 Fish Hatchery At Baker Lake Stops Work For Winter................................................................... 6 Seattle To Build State Hatchery On Upper River........................................................................... 6 Forest Service To Survey Road From Here To Baker Lake........................................................... 7 O’malley Is Appointed As Fish Commissioner.............................................................................. 7 Fish Hatchery Man Has Exciting Trip To Lake.............................................................................. 7 Preliminary Work On Baker Lake Road Started This Week.......................................................... 8 Power Company To Continue
    [Show full text]
  • Baker River Hydroelectric Project FERC No
    Baker River Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 2150 PDEA Initial Review Comments 1/16/04 The documents available to the general public, apparently Volume I, Part 1 of 2, and Volume II, Part 1 of 2, exclude key information including the results of numerous studies and other documents that are part of the license submittal. Because so many studies are incomplete and have therefore not been incorporated into the substantive compilation of factual material relevant to the current re-licensing effort, it is difficult to comment from the County’s perspective regarding addition of flood storage in the Baker Project. For example, there are several references to study “A09,” as yet incomplete, which will provide essential information regarding salmonid spawning and rearing habitat. It is also difficult to comment on a report that does not include the recommended conditions considered necessary to protect fish and wildlife from the federal resource agencies. In numerous instances, the PDEA refers to future actions that will be undertaken after the license is issued. (See page 5-117.) The mechanism to ensure these actions are completed is not clear. It should be noted that Puget Sound Energy (PSE) has refused to conduct a flood control study1 requested by Skagit County on December 2, 2002, to verify the County’s reservoir elevation recommendations, primarily based upon a concern that this study will not be complete in time to include with the license submittal. Yet in several other areas of the re-licensing effort, results of other studies are clearly
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Energy Storage Alternatives in the Puget Sound Energy System
    PNNL- 23040 Assessment of Energy Storage Alternatives in the Puget Sound Energy System Volume 1: Financial Feasibility Analysis December 2013 Patrick Balducci, PNNL Patrick Leslie, Puget Sound Energy Chunlian Jin, PNNL Charles Daitch, Puget Sound Energy Di Wu, PNNL Andy Marshall, Primus Power Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL PNNL-23040 Assessment of Energy Storage Alternatives in the Puget Sound Energy System Volume 1: Financial Feasibility Analysis P Balducci, PNNL C Jin, PNNL D Wu, PNNL M Kintner-Meyer, PNNL P Leslie, Puget Sound Energy C Daitch, Puget Sound Energy A Marshall, Primus Power December 2013 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 and the Bonneville Power Administration. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 Executive Summary For more than a decade, the Pacific Northwest has been capable of generating more electric energy than the region’s utilities required for meeting customer demand. Now, however, the Regional Resource Adequacy Forum’s five-year forecast indicates the region will soon reach load-resource balance. As capacity constraints loom, the percentage of renewables on the grid continues to grow, driven by renewable portfolio standards throughout the region, production tax credits and decreasing costs. In the Bonneville Power Administration region, with a total of 6 gigawatts of wind power, the need to manage the variability and intermittency of renewable energy resources has become a very real challenge, sometimes necessitating wind curtailments to sustain reliable operations. The continued increase of these renewable sources will necessitate the deployment of technologies that can address intermittency in an environmentally sustainable fashion. Energy storage systems have the potential to improve the operating capabilities of the electricity grid.
    [Show full text]
  • Propagation and Distribution of Food Fishes
    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE R. P. LAMONT, Secretary BUREAU OF FISHERIES HENRY O'MALLEY, Commieeioner Bureau of Fisheries Document No. 1098 PROPAGATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD FISHES FISCAL YEAR 1930 By GLEN C. LEACH APPENDIX XVI TO REPORT OF COMMISSIONER OF FISHERIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1930 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON i 1931 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. - - - - - - - - - Price 15 cents PROPAGATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD FISHES, FISCAL 1 YEAR 1930 By GLEN C. LEACH, Chief, Division of Fish Culture CONTENTS Page Introduction - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1125 Part 1.—Fish Production: Propagation and Rescue Work Species handled _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1126 Output 1127 Cooperation with other conservation agencies - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1128 Cooperative fish nurseries - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1129 State fish-cultural activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1132 Salvage of food fishes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1135 Transfers of eggs between stations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1136 Shipments to foreign countries - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1137 Output of stations and substations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1137 Egg collections - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • Total Dissolved Gas Abatement Plan
    TOTAL DISSOLVED GAS ABATEMENT PLAN BAKER RIVER HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC PROJECT NO. 2150 Puget Sound Energy Bellevue, Washington November 2, 2009 Baker TDG Abatement Plan.Doc PUGET SOUND ENERGY Baker River Hydroelectric Project Doc ID: BAK.20091102.0201.PSE.DOE 2 November 2009 Total Dissolved Gas Abatement Plan CONTENTS CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this TDG Abatement Plan .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Organization of This TDG Abatement Plan...................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Project Features............................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 TDG Information........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 TDG Sources at Hydroelectric Projects...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Puget Sound Power and Light Company Records, Acc. No. 2250
    UNIVERSITY U BRARIES w UNIVERSITY of WASHI NGTON Spe ial Colle tions Puget Sound Power and Light Company records Inventory Accession No: 2250-001 Special Collections Division University of Washington Libraries Box 352900 Seattle, Washington, 98195-2900 USA (206) 543-1929 This document forms part of the Guide to the Puget Sound Power and Light Company Records. To find out more about the history, context, arrangement, availability and restrictions on this collection, click on the following link: http://digital.lib.washington.edu/findingaids/permalink/PugetSoundPowerLight2068_2250_5689/ Special Collections home page: http://www.lib.washington.edu/specialcollections/ Search Collection Guides: http://digital.lib.washington.edu/findingaids/search PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY #2250 Guide Organizational History On October 19, 1885 the Seattle Electric Company, the earliest pred- ecessor of the present Puget Sound Power & Light Company, was organized. It began generating electricity on March 22, 1886. During the next ten years as many as 30 small electric companies operated within Seattle, but most were lost to financial insolvency and merger by 1899. During this same period the Stone & Webster Service Corporation was formed and began to provide management for small utilities nationwide. In 1899 Stone & Webster was engaged to study the competitive situation in Seattle. The result was a consolidation in 1900 which placed most of the power, light and railway -services in Seattle under the management of the newly organized Seattle Electric Company and thus established the city's first unified electric system. The increasing electrical demands of the following decade necessi- tated further mergers among the more than 50 separate utilities in the Puget Sound region, from which emerged five major operating companies.
    [Show full text]
  • OUTREACH NOTICE IHC Senior Firefighter Baker River Hotshot Crew Mt
    2010 OUTREACH NOTICE IHC Senior Firefighter Baker River Hotshot Crew Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Mt. Baker Ranger District The Baker River Hotshot Crew is currently conducting outreach for qualified candidates to fill one to two GS-4/5 IHC Senior Firefighter positions. The position is a 13/13 Permanent Seasonal appointment and is covered under firefighter retirement. The start date for this position will be on or around April 11, 2010. This is a career-ladder position and may be filled at either the GS-4 level or GS-5 level. The Baker River Interagency Hotshot Crew is an established Type I, 20-person wildland fire suppression crew. The crew is based in Washington’s North Cascades on 534,334-acre Mt. Baker Ranger District at the Koma Kulshan Guard Station. The station includes: bunkhouse, training, cache, shop, and weight room facilities. Koma Kulshan G.S. is located 35 miles east of the Mt. Baker Ranger District office in Sedro-Woolley, Washington. Sedro-Woolley is a full service community and is near both the Seattle and Vancouver B.C. metropolitan areas. There are also excellent outdoor recreation opportunities in the North Cascades and within the Puget Sound region. The Baker River Crew is seeking motivated individuals with a strong work ethic and leadership experience. Applicants must be in excellent physical condition and must have hand crew experience. The Baker River Hotshot crew is typically available for dispatch to wildfire assignments between May and October. While not on fire assignments, the crew accomplishes project work assignments on the Mt. Baker District and adjacent National Forest and National Park units.
    [Show full text]
  • Baker River Hydroelectric Project
    Baker River Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2150) Washington BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSED INTERIM CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR PUGET SOUND CHINOOK SALMON PENDING RELICENSING Unpublished Work, Copyright 2002, Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Puget Sound Energy, Inc. May 8, 2002 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 LOWER BAKER DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................... 2-1 2.2 UPPER BAKER DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................... 2-3 2.3 BAKER PROJECT FISH FACILITIES ................................................................. 2-3 3. REGULATORY PROCESS ISSUES ............................................................................... 3-1 3.1 ACTION AREA...................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 SPECIES ADDRESSED BY THIS BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT .................... 3-1 3.2.1 Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) .......................................... 3-2 3.3 ACTIVITIES TO BE COVERED BY THE BA .................................................... 3-3 3.3.1 Storage and Release of Water for Power Generation and Flood Control ........................................................................................................ 3-4 3.3.2 Flow Management for Aquatic
    [Show full text]
  • HAER by Historic Name
    HAER by Historic Name Historic Name Other Name CO HAER Number DAHP Number Aberdeen Industrial Water Supply System GH no number 101598-06-GH Alaska Way Viaduct and Battery Street Tunnel KI HAER-WA-184 Alder Mill Site OK no number 101602-24-EPA Annonen Bridge LE no number 071502-22-FHWA Argonne Road Bridge SP no number 061697-05-SP Aurora Avenue Bridge George Washington Memorial KI HAER-WA-107 Bridge, Lake Union Bridge Baker River Bridge Thompson, Henry, Bridge SK HAER-WA-105 Baker River Hydroelectric Project, Fish-Passage and Fish- SK no number 020403-07-FERC Propagation System Barclay Creek Bridge 2/48 SN no number no number Baring Bridge (rehab) KI no number 031093-11-KI Barstow Bridge FE no number 070908-06-FHWA Barstow Bridge ST no number 070908-06-FHWA BNSF Railway Viaduct No. 10-4 CL no number 071808-11-FHWA Boeing Plant 2, Buildings 2-40 & 2-41 & Warehouses 2-31 & 2-44 KI HAER-WA-189 033010-03-KI Bonneville Power Administration Chehalis Substation, Untanking LE HAER-WA-069-A Tower Bonneville Power Administrative Chehalis Substation LE HAER-WA-069 Bonneville Project (HAER-OR-11) SA no number HD00105 Box Canyon Hydorelectric, Powerhouse Gantry Crane PO no number 082707-20-FERC Tuesday, September 17, 2013 Page 1 of 24 Historic Name Other Name CO HAER Number DAHP Number Box Canyon Tunnel (MRNP R&B) Muddy Fork Tunnel LE HAER-WA-070 B-Reactor, Area 100-B, Building 105-B Hanford Site BN HAER-WA-164 B-Reactor, Area 100-B, Building 105-B Hanford Site BN HAER-WA-164-Add 053101-50-DOE Bremerton Ferry Terminal, Passenger Overhead Loading Structure KP no number 060597-04-FHWA Bridges, 12/285, 12/286 & 12/287 12/285, 12/286 & 12/287 LE no number 090992-01-FS-GP Broughton Flume SA HAER-WA-170 Brown Farm Dike TN no number Bumping Lake Dam YA HAER-WA-030 Calispell Diversion Canal PO HAER-WA-016 Canoe Pass Bridge SK HAER-WA-104 Carbon River Road (MRNP R&B) PI HAER-WA-120 Carlton Bridge (Repair Project) 153/20 OK no number 041002-21-FHWA Cedar Creek Log Crib Dam PO no number 092104-19-USFWS Cedar Falls Hydroelectric Works KI HAER-WA-015 Cedar Mountain Bridge No.
    [Show full text]
  • Baker River Hydroelectric Project Relicensing Comprehensive Settlement Agreement, Signed in November 2004 (Agreement)
    2 Based on the information provided in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, other documents, and conversations with staff from Puget Sound Energy, ACOE, and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), we have concluded that effects to the federally-listed grizzly bear and gray wolf associated with the proposed relicensing of the Baker Project would be insignificant and discountable. Therefore, we concur with your “may affect, not likely to adversely affect” determination for grizzly bear and gray wolf. The FWS disagrees that “may affect, likely to adversely affect” is the appropriate effect determination for bull trout critical habitat. Virtually no areas below the Baker Dams are designated bull trout critical habitat, and therefore we believe that the appropriate determination is “no effect.” The FWS does not concur with the “may affect, not likely to adversely affect” determination for bald eagle, marbled murrelet, marbled murrelet critical habitat, northern spotted owl, and northern spotted owl critical habitat because of the potential for increased disturbance due to construction activities and increased visitor use, the potential to remove critical habitat and/or the potential to increase predation of marbled murrelet nests by corvids. We concur with the “may affect, likely to adversely affect” determination for bull trout. We therefore have conducted a formal consultation on the bald eagle, bull trout, marbled murrelet, marbled murrelet critical habitat, northern spotted owl, and northern spotted owl critical habitat. This consultation is complex, involving two Federal action agencies, the analysis of over 50 license articles proposed in the Baker River Hydroelectric Project Settlement Agreement and covering the effects of a license for operation for up to 50 years.
    [Show full text]