Amama Mbabazi Prime Minister of Uganda R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amama Mbabazi Prime Minister of Uganda R President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni State House Nakasero P.O. Box 24597 Kampala Uganda cc: Amama Mbabazi Prime Minister of Uganda Rebecca Alitwala Kadaga Speaker of the Parliament 9 January 2013 Dear Mr President, RE: The Anti-Homosexuality Bill 2012 I write on behalf of The Equal Rights Trust (ERT) to express our serious concern at recent reports that the Anti-Homosexuality Bill 2012 remains under consideration by the parliament of Uganda and may be passed into law in coming months. The Equal Rights Trust is an independent international organisation whose purpose is to combat discrimination and promote equality as a fundamental human right and a basic principle of social justice. ERT is deeply concerned that the Anti-Homosexuality Bill seeks to subject lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people and those who would defend their basic human rights to arbitrary, unreasonable and unjustifiable discrimination within Ugandan criminal law. We therefore urge you to call on parliamentarians in Uganda to reject this law. I attach here our submission of December 2009, which expresses our view that the Anti- Homosexuality Bill seeks to (i) systematically deny LGBT people their right to enjoy equal protection of the law; (ii) criminalise the forming of private relationships between LGBT people; (iii) make it impossible for LGBT people to live their lives with dignity; and (iv) deny LGBT people their inherent right to equality under Article 21 of the Constitution of Uganda. In addition, the submission expresses our particular opposition to the imposition of the death penalty for the offences of “aggravated homosexuality” described under Clause 3, and argues that permitting the application of the death penalty in such a broad range of circumstances as those specified goes far beyond the permissible application of the death penalty under international law. We note that there have been a number reports in recent weeks stating that the imposition of the death penalty has been removed from the Bill,1 and that other aspects of the Bill may be amended or removed.2 The removal of the death penalty would address a single – very significant – violation of international human rights law contained in the Bill. As our submission makes clear however, the Bill as a whole remains in direct contravention of international human rights law, and in particular of the rights to non-discrimination and equality. It remains our firm view that, due to the very nature and purpose of the Bill, it cannot be amended to ensure consistency with Uganda’s international legal obligations, and should instead be rejected in full. Our letter presents substantive legal arguments which establish the conclusion that the Anti- Homosexuality Bill is contrary to: The Constitution of Uganda: In particular, the adoption of the Anti-Homosexuality Bill would violate, inter alia, Article 21 (equality and freedom from discrimination) of the Constitution of Uganda; and Uganda’s obligations under international human rights law: In particular, the adoption of the Anti-Homosexuality Bill would contravene Uganda’s obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. On the basis of the legal analysis presented in the attached letter and in anticipation of the severe discrimination, stigmatisation and persecution that LGBT people and others will suffer if the Bill is adopted, we urge you, in the strongest possible terms, to: 1 BBC News, “Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Bill: MPs drop death penalty”, 23 November 2012, available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-20463887 2 Peter Tatchell Foundation, “Ugandan PM pulls back on anti-gay law?”, 17 December 2012, available at: http://www.petertatchellfoundation.org/uganda/ugandan-pm-pulls-back-anti-gay-law. I. Call on parliamentarians to reject the Anti-Homosexuality Bill; and, should they fail to do so, II. Refuse to assent to the Anti-Homosexuality Bill, as provided in Article 91(3)(c) of the Constitution of Uganda. We further request that you ensure that our opinion is circulated to Members of Parliament, in order that it may inform their discussions on the Bill. Yours sincerely Dr Dimitrina Petrova, Executive Director The Equal Rights Trust .
Recommended publications
  • Ouganda : Un Pays En Mutation Au Cœur D’Une Zone De Fractures
    Les Études du CERI N 4 - septembre 1995 Ouganda : un pays en mutation au cœur d’une zone de fractures Richard Banégas Centre d’études et de recherches internationales Fondation nationale des sciences politiques Ouganda : un pays en mutation au cœur d’une zone de fractures Richard Banégas Entre les images de mort des années Amin et Obote, de la guerre civile et du sida et le souvenir nostalgique de la “ perle de l’Afrique ” (Churchill), l’Ouganda reste prisonnier de clichés hérités d’un passé chaotique qui ne reflètent pourtant plus guère la réalité. L’Ou- ganda actuel est en effet un pays en complète mutation, en pleine reconstruction économique et politique, qui devient un pôle essentiel de stabilité régionale au coeur d’une zone de fractures minée par la violence, marquée par des conflits “ tectoniques ” et la déliquescence des structures économiques ou étatiques. Après des années de guerre civile, au gré d’un processus de pacification et de démocratisation assez lent, un nouvel ordre politique est en train d’émerger. Au plan économique, en contraste avec ses voisins immédiats, l’Ou- ganda offre l’image d’un pays en croissance qui offre aux investisseurs des opportunités d’autant plus intéressantes que se réactive un processus d’intégration régionale (au sein de la Communauté est-africaine) qui, à l’horizon 2000, devrait constituer un des plus vastes marchés d’Afrique avec près de 100 millions d’habitants. A travers cette étude, nous voudrions d’abord évaluer l’ampleur de ces mutations opé- rées par l’Ouganda depuis quelques années et les enjeux économiques, politiques et di- plomatiques qu’elles comportent pour l’ensemble de la zone.
    [Show full text]
  • UGANDA BUSINESS IMPACT SURVE¥ 2020 Impact of COVID-19 on Formal Sector Small and Mediu Enterprises
    m_,," mm CIDlll Unlocking Public and Private Finance for the Poor UGANDA BUSINESS IMPACT SURVE¥ 2020 Impact of COVID-19 on formal sector small and mediu enterprises l anda Revenue Authority •EUROPEAN UNION UGANDA BUSINESS IMPACT SURVEY 2020 Contents ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................................. iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. v BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Business in the time of COVID-19 ............................................................................................................ 1 Uganda formal SME sector ........................................................................................................................ 3 SURVEY INFORMATION ................................................................................................................................ 5 Companies by sector of economic activity ........................................................................................... 5 Companies by size .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Date: 30 October 2008
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: UGA33919 Country: Uganda Date: 30 October 2008 Keywords: Uganda – Uganda People’s Defence Force – Intelligence agencies – Chieftaincy Military Intelligence (CMI) – Politicians This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. Please provide information on the Uganda Peoples Defence Force (Ugandan Army)/Intelligence Agencies and a branch of the Army called Chieftaincy Military Intelligence, especially its history, structure, key officers. Please provide any information on the following people: 2. Noble Mayombo (Director of Intelligence). 3. Leo Kyanda (Deputy Director of CMI). 4. General Mugisha Muntu. 5. Jack Sabit. 6. Ben Wacha. 7. Dr Okungu (People’s Redemption Army). 8. Mr Samson Monday. 9. Mr Kyakabale. 10. Deleted. RESPONSE 1. Please provide information on the Uganda Peoples Defence Force (Ugandan Army)/Intelligence Agencies and a branch of the Army called Chieftaincy Military Intelligence, especially its history, structure, key officers. The Uganda Peoples Defence Force UPDF is headed by General Y Museveni and the Commander of the Defence Force is General Aronda Nyakairima; the Deputy Chief of the Defence Forces is Lt General Ivan Koreta and the Joint Chief of staff Brigadier Robert Rusoke.
    [Show full text]
  • LETSHEGO-Annual-Report-2016.Pdf
    INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT 2016 AbOUT This REPORT Letshego Holdings Limited’s Directors are pleased to present the Integrated Annual Report for 2016. This describes our strategic intent to be Africa’s leading inclusive finance group, as well as our commitment to sustainable value creation for all our stakeholders. Our Integrated Annual Report aims and challenges that are likely to impact to provide a balanced, concise, and delivery of our strategic intent and transparent commentary on our strategy, ability to create value in the short, performance, operations, governance, and medium and long-term. reporting progress. It has been developed in accordance with Botswana Stock The material issues presented in Exchange (BSE) Listing Requirements as the report were identified through well as King III, GRI, and IIRC reporting a stakeholder review process. guidelines. This included formal and informal interviews with investors, sector The cenTral The requirements of the King IV guidelines analysts, Executive and Non- are being assessed and we will address Executive Letshego team members, Theme of The our implementation of these in our 2017 as well as selected Letshego reporT is Integrated Annual Report. customers. sUstaiNAbLE While directed primarily at shareholders A note on diScloSureS vALUE creatiON and providers of capital, this report We are prepared to state what we do and we offer should prove of interest to all our other not disclose, namely granular data on stakeholders, including our Letshego yields and margins as well as on staff an inTegraTed team, customers, strategic partners, remuneration as we deem this to be accounT of our Governments and Regulators, as well as competitively sensitive information the communities in which we operate.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule by Law: Discriminatory Legislation and Legitimized Abuses in Uganda
    RULE BY LAW DIscRImInAtORy legIslAtIOn AnD legItImIzeD Abuses In ugAnDA Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. First published in 2014 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom © Amnesty International 2014 Index: AFR 59/06/2014 Original language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Cover photo: Ugandan activists demonstrate in Kampala on 26 February 2014 against the Anti-Pornography Act. © Isaac Kasamani amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Ownership and Its Impact on Political Speech in Uganda
    African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 THE VIEWS EXPRESSED MUST REPRESENT THOSE OF MANAGEMENT Radio Ownership and its Impact on Political Speech in Uganda 1 African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 Published by: (C) African Centre for Media Excellence For more information contact: African Centre for Media Excellence (ACME) Plot 124 Nanjala Road, Soya-Bunga P. O. Box 11283 Kampala Tel: +256 392 731 067 Fax: +256 392 254 167 Email: [email protected] Website: www.acme-ug.org Layout and Printing Graphic Mutations Ltd., Kampala (U) Tel: +256 414 691 238 / 752 436 317 Email: [email protected] 2 African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 Acknowledgement This study was conducted and authored by George W. Lugalambi (Ph.D), Bernard Tabaire, and Peter Nyanzi. The project was supervised by Peter G. Mwesige (Ph.D). We would like to thank Freedom House for supporting the study and the printing of this report. We would also like to thank the Uganda Communications Commission and FM radio station owners who agreed to be interviewed for their co-operation and support. 3 African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 Contents Introduction Objectives of the study The approach Access to radio during political campaigns The space for critical political discourse The role of regulation Conclusion: Implications for media freedom and political speech References About ACME 4 African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 Introduction The question of who owns the media has in recent years become a growing subject of debate and contention in Uganda. The need to address this question gained greater urgency during the 2011 elections as it emerged that access to radio, in particular, appeared to be influenced by political considerations rather more explicitly than at other times and in previous elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Uganda's Social Impact Investment Landscape
    MAPPING UGANDA’S SOCIAL IMPACT INVESTMENT LANDSCAPE Joseph Kibombo Balikuddembe | Josephine Kaleebi This research is produced as part of the Platform for Uganda Green Growth (PLUG) research series KONRAD ADENAUER STIFTUNG UGANDA ACTADE Plot. 51A Prince Charles Drive, Kololo Plot 2, Agape Close | Ntinda, P.O. Box 647, Kampala/Uganda Kigoowa on Kiwatule Road T: +256-393-262011/2 P.O.BOX, 16452, Kampala Uganda www.kas.de/Uganda T: +256 414 664 616 www. actade.org Mapping SII in Uganda – Study Report November 2019 i DISCLAIMER Copyright ©KAS2020. Process maps, project plans, investigation results, opinions and supporting documentation to this document contain proprietary confidential information some or all of which may be legally privileged and/or subject to the provisions of privacy legislation. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use, disclose, copy, print or disseminate the information contained within this document. Any views expressed are those of the authors. The electronic version of this document has been scanned for viruses and all reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure that no viruses are present. The authors do not accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this document. Please notify the authors immediately by email if this document has been wrongly addressed or delivered. In giving these opinions, the authors do not accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by the prior written consent of the author This document has been prepared solely for the KAS and ACTADE.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Kampala Institutional & Infrastructure Development Project
    Second Kampala Institutional & Infrastructure Development Project By: JOSEPHINE NALUBWAMA MUKASA Uganda; Kampala City MAP OF AFRICA: LOCATION OF UGANDA UGANDA KAMPALA CITY • Located in Kampala district -North of Lake Victoria • Comprised of five Divisions, Kampala Central Division, Kawempe, Makindye, Nakawa, and Lubaga Division. • Size: 189Km2 • Population: 1. 5million (night) Over 3 million (Day) CITY ADMINISTRATION STRUCTURE KAMPALA INFRASTRUCTURE AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Improving mobility, FLOODING IN THE CITY CONGESTION ON THE ROADS connectivity in the city POOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM NON MOTORABLE ROADS OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT • Goal: To enhance infrastructure and Institutional capacity of the city and improve urban mobility for inclusive economic growth. • Project Duration: 5 years (FY2014 – FY 2019) • Project Financing: The project is financed through an Investment Project Financing (IPF) facility of US$175 million (equivalent) IDA Credit and GoU/KCCA counterpart funding of US$8.75 million equivalents. The total project financing is US$183.75 million • Stake holders: Communities, World Bank, Government of Uganda, Utility companies KEY ISSUES OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION • Delays in securing right of way due to contestation of the approved values, mortgaged titles, Titles with Caveats, absent land lords among others; • Delay in securing land for resettlement of project affected persons; • Uncooperative property owners in providing pertinent information; • Sometimes poor political atmosphere – the different political campaigns
    [Show full text]
  • Owned Spaces and Shared Places
    UGANDA Owned Spaces and Shared Places: Refugee Access to Livelihoods and Housing, Land, and Property in Uganda September 2019 Cover photo: Kyaka II refugee settlement. © IMPACT/2019 About REACH REACH Initiative facilitates the development of information tools and products that enhance the capacity of aid actors to make evidence-based decisions in emergency, recovery and development contexts. The methodologies used by REACH include primary data collection and in-depth analysis, and all activities are conducted through inter-agency aid coordination mechanisms. REACH is a joint initiative of IMPACT Initiatives, ACTED and the United Nations Institute for Training and Research - Operational Satellite Applications Programme (UNITAR-UNOSAT). For more information please visit our website: www.reach-initiative.org. You can contact us directly at: [email protected] and follow us on Twitter @REACH_info. About Norwegian Refugee Council The Norwegian Refugee Council is an independent humanitarian organisation working to protect the rights of displaced and vulnerable people during crises. NRC provides assistance to meet immediate humanitarian needs, prevent further displacement and contribute to durable solutions. NRC is Norway’s largest international humanitarian organisation and widely recognised as a leading field-based displacement agency within the international humanitarian community. NRC is a rights-based organisation and is committed to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, independence and impartiality. Refugee Access to Livelihoods and Housing, Land, and Property in Uganda – September 2019 AWKNOWLEDGEMENTS REACH Initiative and NRC would like to thank the government of Uganda’s Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) and the United Nations Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) for their assistance in designing and guiding this assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Amama Mbabazi Expresses Reservations on the Ruling
    6 NEW VISION, Friday, April 1, 2016 NATIONAL NEWS Amama Mbabazi expresses NRM invites Besigye, Mbabazi for talks By David Lumu working with Mbabazi and reservations on the ruling Besigye. They were leaders in With the Supreme Court NRM. Mbabazi has not even By Moses Mulondo petition done and dusted, what returned the NRM party card, next for former prime minister which means he can still work Former independent Amama Mbabazi, is the major with us. Dr. Besigye should presidential candidate Amama political question taking centre also come. NRM invites these Mbabazi has expressed stage. leaders for talks, so that we can reservations about the verdict Speaking to journalists discuss all their issues,” she the judges of the Supreme yesterday, Mbabazi said he said, shortly after the Supreme Court gave yesterday on needs time to exhaustively Court ruling. his petition challenging the answer the question of what “If President Museveni has declaration of President Yoweri next, citing the necessity to been sending teams, some Museveni as the winner of the meet his lawyers and members headed by Dr. Ruhakana presidential election that was of his camp to determine the Rugunda (Prime Minister), to conducted on February 18, way forward. talk to rebels like the leader 2016. However, according to of the Lord’s Resistance Army Flanked by DP president officials from the National Joseph Kony, he could as well Norbert Mao and Justice Forum Resistance Movement (NRM), accommodate Mbabazi and boss Asuman Basalirwa, among the what next package for Besigye, if they return home. others, at the Go Forward Mbabazi is a political sandwich We welcome them to the office in Nakasero, Kampala, of embracing direct talks with roundtable, so that we can Mbabazi said the judgment fell President Yoweri Museveni and debate the issues that forced short of his expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Rubaga Municipality
    FOREWORD This Slum Settlement Profile comes at an opportune time – a time when the city of Kampala is experiencing unprecedented growth in the history of Uganda. This growth and expansion is visible through the mushrooming of informal settlements across the different divisions of Kampala, especially in the low-lying areas of the city. This expansion has definitely exerted enormous pressure on land, with the poor occupying open spaces and the rich pushing the poor out of settlements for commercial and more formalised developments. The urban infrastructure (services and utilities) has not been spared as many residents demand for better quality water, sewer/ sanitation facilities, electricity, roads, security, and proper solid waste management systems. While the city still grapples with serving the existing communities, there are thousands that are flocking to the city in search of employment opportunities and better services. The invisible challenge for both the city and the communities has been lack of data/ information concerning the informal settlements, leading to a very wide gap between the plans and the priorities for the slum residents. The variables looked at in this Slum Profile include, among other factors, Security of Tenure, Housing, Water and Sanitation, Economic Activities, Accessibility, Drainage, and Solid Waste Management. Perhaps, the most outstanding and profound aspect is that this Slum Profile is not a collection of information from lawyers, teachers, doctors, or academicians, but rather ideas from the real slum dwellers who interface with the day-to- day challenges of slum life. KAMPALA PROFILES: RUBAGA Page 1 Table of Contents FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 PROFILE METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................ 3 A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Uganda in the Supreme
    5 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION NO. O1 OF 2016 (CORAM: KATUREEBE, C.J, TUMWESIGYE, KISAAKYE, 10 ARACH AMOKO, NSHIMYE, MWANGUSYA,OPIO-AWERI, MWONDHA, TIBATEMWA-EKIRIKUBINZA, JJ.SC.) AMAMA MBABAZI …………………………………….PETITIONER VERSUS 15 YOWERI KAGUTA MUSEVENI ……………. 1stRESPONDENT ELECTORAL COMMISSION ……………… 2ndRESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ………………… 3rd RESPONDENT PROFESSOR OLOKA ONYANGO & 8 ORS………..AMICI 20 CURIAE DETAILED REASONS FOR THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The Petitioner, who was one of the candidates in the presidential 25 election that was held on the 18th February, 2016 petitioned the 1 5 Supreme Court under the Constitution, the Presidential Elections Act, 2000 and the Electoral Commission Act, 1997 (hereinafterreferred to as the PEA and the ECA, respectively). He challenged the result of the election and sought a declaration that Yoweri Kaguta Museveni, the 1st Respondent, was not 10 validly elected and an order that the election be annulled. On the 31st March 2016, we delivered our decision in line with the Constitutional timeline imposed on the Court to render its judgment within 30 days from the date of filing the petition. We were not, however, in a position to give detailed reasons for our 15 findings and conclusion. We found that the 1st Respondent was validly elected as President in accordance with Article 104 of the Constitution and Section 59 of the PEA. Accordingly, we unanimously dismissed the petition. We made no order as to costs. 20 We promised to give the detailed reasons at a later date, which we now give in this judgment. Background The 18thFebruary 2016 General Elections were the 3rd since the re-introduction of multiparty politics in Uganda as the country 25 shifted from the movement system.
    [Show full text]