By Jairo Antonio Hoyos Galvis BA In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

By Jairo Antonio Hoyos Galvis BA In LOS LABERINTOS DE LA JOTERÍA: UNA HISTORIA SEXUAL DE LA ESTÉTICA MEXICANA (1917-1934) by Jairo Antonio Hoyos Galvis B. A. in Literature, Universidad de los Andes, 2010 M.A. in Literature, Universidad de los Andes, 2012 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2016 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS & SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Jairo Antonio Hoyos Galvis It was defended on November 8, 2016 and approved by Duchesne-Winter, Ph.D., Professor Latin American Literature Elizabeth Monasterios, Ph.D., Professor of Latin American Literature Jennifer Josten, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Art and Architecture of Latin America Dissertation Advisor: Daniel Balderston, Ph.D., Mellon Professor of Modern Languages ii Copyright © by Jairo Antonio Hoyos Galvis 2016 iii LOS LABERINTOS DE LA JOTERÍA: UNA HISTORIA SEXUAL DE LA ESTÉTICA MEXICANA (1917-1934) Jairo Antonio Hoyos Galvis, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2016 Sex is fundamental. This research analyzes the deep entanglements between artistic expression and sexuality in Mexico from 1917-1934. Particularly, I examine the works of effeminate and homosexual artists: Salvador Novo, Xavier Villaurrutia, Agustín Lazo, Elías Nandino, Carlos Pellicer, Germán Pardo García, and Roberto Montenegro. This dissertation is divided into three chapters and a “Coda”. In the first chapter, I explore the genesis of “jotería literaria” in the works of Novo and Villaurrutia. I also develop my concepts of “trans-corporality,” “intimacy,” and “corporal assemblage.” In the second chapter, I study how artists understood the relationship between the body and avant-garde art during the first half of the 1920s: on the one hand, I study the concept of masculine body that supports Manuel Maples Arce’s aesthetic project. On the other, I examine how homosexual artists created an artistic expression for the effeminate male body. In the third chapter, I examine the disputes between communist and homosexuals in Mexico from 1924 to 1934. I analyze how eugenics entangled with public policy and biology to support homophobic political movements. In the first part, I study these entwines through the works of Carlos Gutiérrez Cruz, José Clemente Orozco, and Diego Rivera. In the second part, I study how Novo, Villaurrutia, Lazo, Pellicer, Pardo García, and Nandino’s poetry and paintings created an artistic expression that conveys the experience of homosexual love and sexuality. Finally, this dissertation objective was to write a sexual history of male effeminacy and its relevance in the debates on art and literature in Mexico. iv TABLA DE CONTENIDO PREFACIO ............................................................................................................................... VIII 1.0 VEDADA OBERTURA: EL CULO NOVO Y LOS AMANTES DE WILDE ...... 1 2.0 SEXUAR LA LITERATURA: ESCRITURA DE JOTERÍA (1917-1920) ........... 12 2.1 CON XAVIER: LA CORPORALIAD DE LOS CONDENADOS................ 23 2.2 A LOS AMANTES: EL OTRO MAETERLINCK O “PARÁBOLA DEL HERMANO” ....................................................................................................................... 47 3.0 AFEMINAR LA VANGUARDIA: RETRATO DE JOTERÍA (1920-1923) ........ 65 3.1 A MANUEL MAPLES ARCE: UNA HIGIENE DE MIEMBROS ELÉCTRICOS .................................................................................................................... 71 3.2 CUERPOS PARA SAN SEBASTIÁN: RETRATOS DE JOTERÍA ............ 90 4.0 MARICONEAR MÉXICO: JOTAS VS. COMUNISTAS ................................... 137 4.1 EL CULO, EL ÓRGANO Y LA PIERNA: LA HOMOFOBIA BIOLÓGICA DEL COMUNISMO MEXICANO ................................................................................. 140 4.2 NUEVO AMOR: MIRADAS EXPLOSIVAS DE LA JOTERÍA ................. 182 CODA: “HUBO SIEMPRE LOCAS EN MÉXICO” Y QUIEN SE LAS CHINGARA .... 210 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................... 213 APÉNDICE: LISTA DE ARCHIVOS .................................................................................... 226 v LISTA DE FIGURAS Figure 1: John Sholto Douglas. “To Oscar Wilde, posing somdomite” [sic] ................................ 2 Figure 2: Récipe del sanatorio y consultorio de los doctores Voiers y Grande Ampudia. ............ 6 Figure 3: Manuel Maples Arce. Actual No.1. .............................................................................. 79 Figure 4: Autoría Colectiva. Caligrama D.R. .............................................................................. 84 Figure 5: Ricardo Salazar. Salvador Novo con una escultura de San Sebastián......................... 89 Figure 6: Giovanni Antonio Bazzi “Il Sodoma”, San Sebastián. ................................................ 94 Figure 7: Guido Reni. San Sebastián. .......................................................................................... 96 Figure 8: The Illustrated Sporting and Dramatic News. Oscar Wilde. ...................................... 105 Figure 9: Atribuidos a Salvador Novo. Desnudos I, II III. ........................................................ 106 Figure 10: Atribuidos a Salvador Novo. San Sebastián. ........................................................... 107 Figure 11: Roberto Montenegro. El árbol de la vida. 1922. ..................................................... 108 Figure 12: Roberto Montenegro. El árbol de la vida. 2016. ..................................................... 109 Figure 13: Roberto Montenegro. San Sebastian. 1915. ............................................................. 112 Figure 14: Manuel Rodríguez Lozano. Retrato de Salvador Novo, 1924. ................................ 117 Figure 15: El chafirete. “Como se dirige el tráfico en México”. 1922 (izquierda) ................... 123 Figure 16: El chafirete. “El ‘humanitarismo’ de las cruces”. 1922. (derecha) ......................... 123 Figure 17: Roberto Montenegro. Intercalado en las páginas de “¡Qué México!” ..................... 124 Figure 18: Fernando Bolaños Cacho. “Manuscrito de un hombre colonial”, 1923. .................. 126 vi Figure 19: Abraham Ángel. Caratula de la tesis de Raul Fournier, 1924. ............................... 135 Figura 20: Jesús Guerrero Galván. “Uno de los otros. Uno de los nuestros”, 1934. ................. 136 Figure 21: José Clemente Orozco. “Los anales” en “Los rorros fachistas”. ............................. 144 Figure 22: Diego Rivera, “El que quiera comer que trabaje”. ................................................... 164 Figure 23: Diego Rivera. “Man at the Crossroads” (Destruido), 1933...................................... 169 Figure 24: Diego Rivera. “El hombre, controlador del universo”, 1934. .................................. 169 Figure 25: Xavier Guerrero. “El que no trabaja no come”, 1926. ............................................. 172 Figure 26: Diego Rivera, “El que quiera comer que trabaje” (detalle). ..................................... 174 Figure 27: Tina Modotti. Antonieta Rivas Mercado. 1929 (derecha). ....................................... 176 Figure 28: Diego Rivera. “El que quiera…” Detalle de Rivas Mercado (izquierda). ............... 176 Figure 29: Recopilación de ilustraciones de Salvador Novo, 1926-1932. CEHM. ................... 177 Figure 30: Diego Rivera, “El que quiera comer que trabaje” (detalle) ...................................... 179 Figure 31: Federico García Lorca. “Amor” (izquierda). ........................................................... 200 Figure 32: Federico García Lorca. “Sólo el misterio nos hace vivir” (derecha). ...................... 200 Figure 33: Agustín Lazo. Que se cierre esa puerta. Sin Fecha. ................................................ 203 Figure 34: Salvador Novo. “Al porvenir/poema confío la pena”. ............................................. 208 Figure 35: Dibujo, Xavier Villaurrutia, César Moro y José Manuel Delgado. Agustín Lazo.... 209 vii PREFACIO Gracias… viii 1.0 VEDADA OBERTURA: EL CULO NOVO Y LOS AMANTES DE WILDE Yo no nací para amar nadie nació para mí… mis sueños nunca se volvieron realidad. Siempre lo busqué pero nunca pude encontrar ese amor Juan Gabriel, “Yo no nací para amar” En la primavera de 1895, Oscar Wilde (1854-1900) fue sentenciado a dos años de trabajos forzados en la prisión de Reading por haber ofendido a la sociedad inglesa con sus prácticas indecentes —el tiempo de prisión adjudicado fue el máximo establecido en la Enmienda Labouchere de 1885 (Bristow 16). Aunque no fue condenado por inversión, pederastia o sodomía, el “Sentencing Statement of Justice Wills” dictaminó que el escritor fue “el centro de un extenso círculo de la más inmunda corrupción entre los hombre jóvenes”1 [“the center of a circle of extensive corruption of the most hideous kind among young men”]. En el juicio del 26 de abril al 1 mayo, el fiscal Charles Gill lo incriminó usando como parte de la evidencia dos 1 Al menos que se indique lo contrario, todas las traducciones son mías. 1 poemas de uno de sus presuntos amantes, Lord Alfred Bruce Douglas (1870-1945): “In Praise of Shame” y “Two Loves” —ambos publicados en la revista The Chameleon en 1894. El alegado amante era hijo del noveno marqués de Queensberry John Sholto Douglas (1844-1900). Precisamente, este noble caballero británico fue quien denunció los comportamientos impúdicos de Wilde
Recommended publications
  • The Reconstruction of Colonial Monuments in the 1920S and 1930S in Mexico ELSA ARROYO and SANDRA ZETINA
    The reconstruction of Colonial monuments in the 1920s and 1930s in Mexico ELSA ARROYO AND SANDRA ZETINA Translation by Valerie Magar Abstract This article presents an overview of the criteria and policies for the reconstruction of historical monuments from the viceregal period in Mexico, through the review of paradigmatic cases which contributed to the establishment of practices and guidelines developed since the 1920s, and that were extended at least until the middle of the last century. It addresses the conformation of the legal framework that gave rise to the guidelines for the protection and safeguard of built heritage, as well as the context of reassessment of the historical legacy through systematic studies of representative examples of Baroque art and its ornamental components, considered in a first moment as emblematic of Mexico’s cultural identity. Based on case studies, issues related to the level of reconstruction of buildings are discussed, as well as the ideas at that time on the historical value of monuments and their function; and finally, it presents the results of the interventions in terms of their ability to maintain monuments as effective devices for the evocation of the past through the preservation of its material remains. Keywords: reconstruction, viceregal heritage, neo-Colonial heritage Background: the first piece of legislation on monuments as property of the Mexican nation While the renovation process of the Museo Nacional was taking place in 1864 during the Second Empire (1863-1867) under the government of the Emperor Maximilian of Habsburg, social awareness grew about the value of objects and monuments of the past, as well as on their function as public elements capable of adding their share in the construction of the identity of the modern nation that the government intended to build in Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Kitagawa Tamiji's Art and Art Education
    KITAGAWA TAMIJI’S ART AND ART EDUCATION: TRANSLATING CULTURE IN POSTREVOLUTIONARY MEXICO AND MODERN JAPAN By Copyright 2017 TAKAAKI KUMAGAI Submitted to the graduate degree program in Art History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ________________________________ Chairperson: Maki Kaneko ________________________________ David Cateforis ________________________________ Sherry Fowler ________________________________ Elaine Gerbert ________________________________ Amy McNair Date Defended: April 7, 2017 The Dissertation Committee for Takaaki Kumagai certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: KITAGAWA TAMIJI‘S ART AND ART EDUCATION: TRANSLATING CULTURE IN POSTREVOLUTIONARY MEXICO AND MODERN JAPAN _____________________________ Chairperson: Maki Kaneko Date approved: April 7 2017 ii Abstract This dissertation investigates the life and career of the Japanese painter, printmaker, and art educator, Kitagawa Tamiji (1894-1989), and his conception of Mexico as cultural Other. Today, Kitagawa is widely recognized in Japan as an artist and educator, whose thought and practices were deeply inspired by his long-term residence in postrevolutionary Mexico (1921-1936). Kitagawa left Japan at the age of twenty to study art in the United States. After engaging in several temporary jobs and briefly being trained at the Art Students League of New York, he went to Mexico in 1921, to eventually spend the next decade and a half working as an artist and art educator. Kitagawa‘s conception and narrative of Mexican culture—especially that of the Mexican indigenous population—are noteworthy for an early twentieth-century artist/intellectual. Rather than seeing Mexico in terms of its widespread stereotype as a distant tropical country, he regarded the country as a key locus of the emerging anti-colonial notion of culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on Mexico City Here!
    MEXICO CITY The Historic Center of Mexico City was built on the ancient lake of Mexico. The Aztec Empire's governing center, which still preserves the elements of the urban structure of the pre-Hispanic city, as in Xochimilco, where the Aztec-originated lake system survives. For its historical and cultural value, for being an exceptional example of urban settlement, for having witnessed the fusion of two cultures, inscribed on the World Heritage List on 11 December 1987 City Heritage The Historic Center of Mexico City is the heart of the city, being located in the center of political, economic, social and cultural power of the country is also the heart of Mexico. For its historical and cultural value, for being an exceptional example of urban settlement, for having seen the fusion of two cultures in its buildings, houses, streets and cathedral. EXPLORE THE CITY San Carlos Academy Founded by Royal Decree of December 25, 1783 as the Royal Academy of San Carlos de las Nobles Artes, is located in what is now known as the Historic Center of Mexico City, in the old street of the Love of God, today, and to be located there the school, Academy Street. Architecture, painting and sculpture were the main branches that were taught. It has been the object and consequence of the ideologies of the times. At first, it emerged as the "academy" that the enlightened eighteenth century proclaimed, which manifested the need to have a place and a collegiate group to theorize and practice a method of study. Since its birth, the Academy of San Carlos has been the place where the most important artists of the country have converged, for this reason it has had several moments of boom during its trajectory.
    [Show full text]
  • On Orozco´S Misogyny and Public Art in the Americas Anales Del Instituto De Investigaciones Estéticas, Vol
    Anales del Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas ISSN: 0185-1276 [email protected] Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas México Coffey, Mary K. "...Without Any of the Seductions of Art": On Orozco´s Misogyny and Public Art in the Americas Anales del Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, vol. XXV, núm. 83, otoño, 2003, pp. 99-119 Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas Distrito Federal, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=36908304 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative MARY K. COFFEY new york university “Without Any of the Seductions of Art” On Orozco’s Misogyny and Public Art in the Americas ithin the scholarship on Orozco there exists a tacit consensus about the artist’s misogyny. So apparent is this attribute of his Woeuvre that it barely requires argumentation, so obvious, it merits no real interrogation, so accepted, it can be tossed off as an aside en route to more important analytic pursuits.1 Indeed even a cursory survey of Orozco’s painting, drawings, and frescos would seem to confirm this thesis, riddled as they are with grimacing prostitutes, grotesque society ladies, and pathetic waifs representing a variety of victims who never quite elicit the viewer’s sym- pathy. Leaving aside for the moment that one could query with equal critical- ity the alternative visions of woman one finds in the work of Siqueiros and Rivera, I want to interrogate this consensus (one that I am implicated in as 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SEPTEMBER 16, 2020 Mexico National Day Special
    Mexico National Day Special Solid relationship continues to strengthen and grow MELBA PRIA ter in 2011 or the earthquake in Mexico cinema, among other special collabora- 2020 also marks the 15th anniversary Mexico, as it is also the only Latin Ameri- AMBASSADOR OF MEXICO City back in 2017 when rescue teams and tions with academics, artists and other of the free trade agreement between can country that holds daily direct flights experts from both countries have been of celebrated personalities. Mexico and Japan, representing the first between capitals. Sept. 16 marks the critical help to one another. This year we are also celebrating a comprehensive free trade agreement that We hope that the friendship between 210th anniversary The last few months have represented decade since the inclusion of traditional includes the agricultural sector. our countries, which started over 410 of the beginning of a big challenge for the whole world. This Mexican cuisine on UNESCO’s Intangible For Japan, it’s the first free trade agree- years ago, keeps strengthening and our country’s inde- has allowed us to learn to live in a new Cultural Heritage list. ment with a Latin American country. This expanding. pendence move- way, stronger and adapting to a different In light of this, we have been working agreement opened the door to business I would like to take this opportunity ment, a moment reality. Due to these circumstances, we are to develop a program for Mexican restau- opportunities that have resulted in posi- to express on behalf of the government that occupies a required to celebrate our Independence rant certification in Tokyo, to guarantee tioning Mexico as Japan’s most important of Mexico and members of the Mexican very special place Day through a virtual ceremony.
    [Show full text]
  • La Columna De La Independencia
    Producción: Editorial Jilguero S.A. de C. V/ Méxi<o Desconocido. Coordinación Editorial: Leonor López Domínguez. Diseño: Rodo Mireles Gavito. Primera edición 1990 D.R.C. Editorial Jilguero S.A. de C.V. México, D .F. ISBN-968--6520-00-7 La presente edición es producto del esfuerzo y el trabajo de un equipo humano profundamente comprometido con México. Su edición e impresión han sido patrocinadas por las empresas de: Holding Fiasa Mexival Sector Marftimo Casa de Bolsa Sector Turfstico Seguros Sector Automotrfz Arrendamiento Financiero Casa de Cambio Factoraje HOLDING FIASA ANGEL 1 AOORIGUE.Z SAEZ Con profundo agrado, Holding Fiasa ofrece a sus amigos y clientes esta edición, única en su género, alusiva al monumento de los Héroes de Independencia. Con esta obra, estamos contribuyendo a cumplir con el gran compromiso que tenemos hacia nuestro país y que hemos heredado del sentimiento nacionalista del fundador del Grupo Holding Fiasa, Don Isidoro Rodríguez Ruiz. A lo largo de esta publicación, el lector no sólo conocerá la visión histórica de los aspectos políticos y sociales, que culminan con el movimiento revolucionario y el nacimiento de nuestra actual Nación; sino también los aspectos anecdóticos y las vicisitudes de la construcción de uno de los monumentos más representa­ tivos de nuestro país que, sin duda alguna, es el sello distintivo de la Ciudad de México. Esperamos que esta edición sobre la Columna y el Angel de la Independencia, sea de su agrado y que su lectura le resulte útil para mayor conocimiento de nuestra c1udad y nuestro país. Presidente del Consejo de Adm1n1stración.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Latin America's Capital Cities
    «o Planning Latin America’s Capital Cities, 1850-1950 cs edited by Arturo Almandoz First published 2002 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge, 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group © 2002 Selection and editorial matter: Arturo Almandoz; individual chapters: the contributors Typeset in Garamond by PNR Design, Didcot, Oxfordshire Printed and bound in Great Britain by St Edmundsbury Press, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk This book was commissioned and edited by Alexandrine Press, Oxford All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any informa­ tion storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. The publisher makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy of the information contained in this book and cannot accept legal responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions that may be made. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library o f Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested ISBN 0-415-27265-3 ca Contents *o Foreword by Anthony Sutcliffe vii The Contributors ix Acknowledgements xi 1 Introduction 1 Arturo Almandoz 2 Urbanization and Urbanism in Latin America: from Haussmann to CIAM 13 Arturo Almandoz I CAPITALS OF THE BOOMING ECONOMIES 3 Buenos Aires, A Great European City 45 Ramón Gutiérrez 4 The Time of the Capitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Pepe Zúñiga and Mexico City's Rebel Generation
    Portrait of a Young Painter Portrait of a Young Painter Pepe Zúñiga and Mexico City’s Rebel Generation Mary Kay Vaughan Duke University Press Durham and London 2015 © 2015 Duke University Press All rights reserved Designed by Chris Crochetière Typeset in Minion and Meta type by BW&A Books, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Vaughan, Mary K., 1942– Portrait of a young painter : Pepe Zúñiga and Mexico City’s rebel generation / Mary Kay Vaughan. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-0-8223-5765-0 (hardcover : alk. paper) isbn 978-0-8223-5781-0 (pbk. : alk. paper) isbn 978-0-8223-7612-5 (e-book) 1. Zúñiga, José, 1937– 2. Painters—Mexico—Biography. 3. Art—Political aspects—Mexico. I. Title. nd259.z787v38 2014 759.972—dc23 [B] 2014030835 Unless otherwise noted, all photographs in this book are from the personal collection of José “Pepe” Zúñiga and are used by permission. Title page photograph: Pepe in 1952. Cover art: Pepe Zúñiga, Autoretrato, 1968. Photograph: Juan Miranda Salgado. For Pepe Zúñiga, of course. Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 1 Lupe’s Voice 29 2 Enchanting City / Magical Radio 44 3 Pepe at School and with God, the Virgin, and the Saints 58 4 My Father, My Teacher 78 5 The Zúñiga Family as a Radionovela 98 6 “How Difficult Is Adolescence!” 127 7 “Five Pesos, Two Pencils, and an Eraser!” 145 8 Exuberant Interlude: Painting at the Museo de Antropología 173 9 Private Struggle / Public Protest: 1965–1972 184 10 Subjectivity and the Public Sphere: The Mature Art of José “Pepe” Zúñiga 212 Notes 241 Bibliography 259 Index 279 Acknowledgments In May 1970, when the United States bombed Cambodia, students at the University of Wisconsin went wild with angry frustration.
    [Show full text]
  • Antonieta Rosario Silvia
    MexicanGreat Women Antonieta Rivas Mercado Key player in the group of artists and intellectuals that revitalized Mexican culture after the Revolutionary period, the political activist and women’s rights’ defender during the 20th century - daughter of architect Antonio Rivas Mercado, creator of the Angel of Independence - stands out for her actions on developing culture in Mexico, including the creation of Ulises Theater and the Symphonic Orchestra of Mexico. She also edited books written by great Mexican pens such as Xavier Villaurrutia, Gilberto Owen and Andrés Henestrosa. Rosario Castellanos Born in Chiapas in 1925, she is considered one of the greatest writers and poetesses in Mexico and the Spanish language. She worked in the National Indigenous Institute in Chiapas and in Mexico City, looking to improve the living conditions of indigenous people and women in her country. She taught literature and philosophy at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), the Iberoamericana University and the Universities of Wisconsin, Colorado and Indiana in the United States. Her novel Balún Canán (1957), her poems in Lívida Luz (Livid Light, 1960) and her essays in Mujer que sabe latín (Woman who knows Latin, 1974), are considered key works in Mexican literature. Silvia Torres Castilleja Recognized scientist who was the first Mexican woman to obtain a PhD in Astronomy. Like Stephen Hawking, Nicholas Copernicus, Giordano Bruno and Johannes Kepler, Silvia Torres Castilla has made great contributions to astronomy; specifically in the study of the chemical composition of the Universe’s nebulae. During her career she has been appointed as president of the International Astronomical Union, as well as receiving several awards such as the L’Oréal-UNESCO Life Sciences Award, the Guillaume Budé Medal of the College of France and Mexico’s National Science and Arts Prize..
    [Show full text]