Sustainability at CMU: a Path Forward

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sustainability at CMU: a Path Forward *** REVIEW PANEL DRAFT – NOT FOR CITATION OR DISTRIBUTION *** Disclaimer and Explanatory Note This report is the product of a Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) undergraduate research project, in which students from several academic disciplines combine their talents to explore a policy issue involving technology. For one semester, these students conduct research, and then present their results under the direction of CMU faculty and graduate students. This report has not been critically reviewed by experts in the field. Please do not cite or quote this report, or any portion thereof, as an official Carnegie Mellon University report or document. As a student project, it has not been subjected to the required level of critical review. 1 Project Participants This is a joint study conducted by students of the Department of Engineering and Public Policy (EPP) and the Department of Social and Decision Sciences (SDS) at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) for the Fall semester of 2018 under the classes 19-452: EPP Projects and 88-452: Policy Analysis Senior Projects. STUDENTS Benjamin Almack MechE/EPP Adwoa Bonsu ChemE/EPP Shuchen Cong MSE/EPP Elizabeth Elrod MechE/EPP Nathaniel Fleming CEE/EPP Nicole Ho MechE/EPP Julie Kim SDS Cathy Li ChemE/EPP Jasmine Lim MechE/EPP Brenda Mokua ChemE/EPP Lauren Mueller CEE/EPP Jack Ronayne ChemE/EPP Richard Ruales ChemE/EPP Ariana Sabbat CEE/EPP Clement Wong MechE/EPP Elizabeth Young CEE/EPP James Zhang MechE/EPP PROJECT MANAGER Aviva Loew (EPP) FACULTY ADVISORS John H. Miller (SDS) Edward S. Rubin (MechE/EPP) 2 Review Panel Martin Altschul University Engineer, Carnegie Mellon University Karen Clay Professor of Economics and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University Donald Coffelt Director of FMS, Carnegie Mellon University Stephen R. Lee Department Head and Professor, School of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University Jarrod McAdoo Director, University Procurement, Carnegie Mellon University Nick Muller Professor of Economics, Engineering, and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University Robert Reppe Senior Director, Campus Design and Facility Development, Carnegie Mellon University Anna Siefken Executive Director of Scott Institute, Carnegie Mellon University Aurora Sharrard Director of Sustainability, University of Pittsburgh The faculty, project manager, and students would like to thank the members of the Review Panel for their time, effort, and feedback on this report. 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary 9 Chapter 1: Introduction 11 1.1 Definitions of Sustainability 11 1.2 Study Objectives 15 1.3 Metrics and Evaluation Framework 16 1.4 Organization of Report 16 1.5 Chapter 1 References 17 Chapter 2 Sustainability in Campus Buildings 19 2.1 Introduction 19 2.2 Building Construction Standards 22 2.3 Building Certifications 26 2.3.1 Current Certifications 26 2.3.2 Pittsburgh 2030 District Goals 28 2.4 Electricity Use in Buildings 30 2.4.1 Electricity Usage Trends and Projections 30 2.4.2 Potential for Energy Savings 35 2.5 Steam and Natural Gas Use in Buildings 36 2.5.1 Steam and Gas Usage Trends and Projections 37 2.5.2 Potential for Energy Savings 39 2.6 Environmental Emissions from Energy Use in Buildings 40 2.7 Cogeneration 47 2.8 Conclusions for Campus Buildings 49 2.9 Chapter 2 References 50 Chapter 3: Sustainable Water and Waste Management 53 3.1 Introduction 53 3.1.1 Metrics of Sustainability 53 3.1.2 Chapter Objectives and Organization 54 3.2 Water Use 54 3.3 Solid Waste Management 61 3.3.1 Total Waste Production 62 3.3.2 Food waste and Composting 64 4 3.3.3 Other Recycling Activities 66 3.3.4 Future Needs and Options 68 3.4 Hazardous Waste Management 71 3.4.1 Hazardous Waste Generation 71 3.4.2 Exposure to Hazardous Materials 72 3.4.3 Management of Hazardous Wastes 73 3.4.4 Future Needs and Options 74 3.5 Conclusions for Waste and Water Management 75 3.6 Chapter 3 References 75 Chapter 4: Sustainability in Transportation 77 4.1 Introduction 77 4.1.1 Current Transportation Systems at Carnegie Mellon University 77 4.1.2 Dimensions and Metrics of Sustainability in Transportation 78 4.2 University Business Air Travel 79 4.2.1 Carbon Emissions from Faculty and Staff Business Air Travel 79 4.2.2 Carbon Emissions from Student Organization Air Travel 83 4.3 University Business Non-Air Travel 84 4.3.1 Faculty and Staff Business Non-Air Travel 84 4.3.2 Student Organization Non-Air Travel 86 4.4 Strategies to Mitigate Emissions from University-Sponsored Travel 88 4.5 Faculty and Staff Commuting 88 4.5.1 Residence Zip Code Mapping 88 4.5.2 Vehicle Zip Code Mapping 90 4.5.3 Strategies to Reduce Driving Commutes 92 4.6 Bicycling 93 4.6.1 Current Status of Bicycling At CMU 93 4.6.2 Plans in Progress 95 4.6.3 What is Preventing Bicycling? 96 4.6.4 Strategies to Increase Bicycling 98 4.7 Conclusions for Campus Transportation Systems 101 4.8 Chapter 4 References 102 Chapter 5: Sustainability Education and Research 104 5.1 Metrics of Sustainability Education and Research 104 5 5.2 Educational Activities in Sustainability 104 5.2.1 Benchmarking Other Universities 104 5.2.2 Sustainability Education at Carnegie Mellon 105 5.2.2.1 Sustainability Programs 105 5.2.2.2 Student and Faculty Engagement 112 5.3 Research Activities in Sustainability 112 5.3.1 Benchmarking Other Universities 112 5.3.2 Sustainability Research at Carnegie Mellon 114 5.4 Conclusions for Campus Education and Research 119 5.5 Chapter 5 References 119 Chapter 6: Societal and Behavioral Dimensions of Sustainability 122 6.1 Introduction 122 6.2 Social/Societal Dimensions of Sustainability 125 6.2.1 Quality of Life 125 6.2.2 Diversity and Equity 127 6.2.5 Current Activities 129 6.3 Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability 130 6.4 Conclusions for Societal and Behavioral Dimensions 133 6.5 Chapter 6 References 134 Chapter 7: Economic and Financial Dimensions of Sustainability 139 7.1 Introduction 139 7.2 Current Activities 146 7.3 Future Needs and Options 151 7.4 Conclusions for Economic Sustainability 152 7.5 Chapter 7 References 153 Chapter 8: Organizational Structures for Sustainability 157 8.1 Summary of Organizational Structures at Peer Institutions 157 8.2 Current Organization at Carnegie Mellon 159 8.3 Discussion of Change Agents 160 8.4 Proposed Organizational Structure for Carnegie Mellon 161 8.5 Chapter 8 References 162 Chapter 9: Conclusions and Recommendations 164 9.1 Summary of Conclusions 164 6 9.2 Recommendations of this Study 165 9.3 Chapter 9 References 169 Appendices 170 Appendix 2-1: Keywords in Building Standards 171 Appendix 2-2: Peer Institutions and Document Length 172 Appendix 2-3: LEED Certification by Net Square Footage 173 Appendix 2-5: CMU Electricity Usage 186 Appendix 2-6: Campus Building Electricity Usage 187 Appendix 2-7: CO2 Emissions Due to Heating 189 Appendix 2-8: Emission Rates Based on Zip Code 190 Appendix 2-9: RECs Pricing and CMU RECs Cost 191 Appendix 3-1: Metering in Academic Buildings 192 Appendix 3-2: Water Use in Academic and Administrative Buildings 193 Appendix 3-3: Water Use in Residential Halls and Greek Houses 194 Appendix 3-4: Waste Data 195 Appendix 4-1: Faculty and Staff Air Travel Costs and Emissions Sorted by College 196 Appendix 4-2: Faculty and Staff Car Rental Costs and Emissions 198 Appendix 4-3: Student Organization Air Travel Costs and Emissions 199 Appendix 4-4: Student Organization Gas Purchase Costs and Emissions 200 Appendix 4-5: Student Organization Car Rental Costs and Emissions 201 Appendix 4-6: Faculty and Staff Residence Zip Code Tally, 2018-2019 202 Appendix 4-7: CMU Parking Permit Holders’ Residence Zip Code Tally, 2018-2019 210 Appendix 4-8: Bike Thefts Reported to CMU Police Department (2/6/2016 - 10/3/2018) 218 Appendix 4-9: Bicycle Advocacy Committee Survey Response 220 Appendix 5-1: Sustainability-Related Keywords 226 Appendix 5-2: Sustainability-Related Courses at Carnegie Mellon 227 Appendix 5-3: Sustainability-Related Programs at Carnegie Mellon 236 Appendix 5-4: Peer Universities’ Sustainability Research Websites 239 Appendix 5-5: Peer universities’ keywords and focus areas 240 Appendix 7-1: Major Finances at Carnegie Mellon University 245 Appendix 7-2: US University Endowments over One Billion Dollars 246 Appendix 7-3: Endowment Per Student for Peer Institutions 250 Appendix 7-4: Expense and Equity Ratio for Peer Institutions 251 7 Appendix 7-5: Top 50 Alumni Networks in US 252 8 Executive Summary In discussing sustainability at Carnegie Mellon University, this report expands upon a previous analysis of CMU’s carbon footprint (Pittsburgh to Paris, 2017) in three main ways: it 1) provides a more comprehensive analysis of CMU’s environmental impacts beyond carbon emissions, 2) incorporates non- environmental aspects of sustainability, and 3) analyzes and recommends a more general set of actions to move CMU forward in sustainability. It begins with a definition of sustainability and defines an evaluation framework for the university’s current sustainability actions and proposals. The analysis is divided into several different areas: Campus Buildings, Water and Waste Management, Transportation, Education and Research, Social and Behavioral Dimensions, Economic and Financial Aspects, and Organizational Structure. After separately evaluating these dimensions, overall conclusions and recommendations are presented. CMU does not have a centralized office of sustainability. Several different entities on campus, such as Facilities Management Services and the Green Practices Committee, independently address certain aspects of sustainability, as do a number of individuals on campus. Overall, however, such activities are highly decentralized, without any high-level organization, structure, coordination or communication.
Recommended publications
  • The Evolving DE Systems Landscape in Pittsburgh Cliff Blashford Clearway Energy, Inc
    The Evolving DE Systems Landscape in Pittsburgh Cliff Blashford Clearway Energy, Inc. June 24, 2019 The Evolving DE Systems Landscape in Pittsburgh Today’s Agenda – 6/24/2019 • Introduction • Pittsburgh: Resiliency • Pittsburgh: Connectedness • Pittsburgh: Vision • Pittsburgh – District Energy Systems • DES – Clearway Energy • DES – Duquesne University • DES – University Complex • DES – PACT • Pittsburgh – The Future Proprietary and Confidential Information 2 Evolving DE Systems Landscape Pittsburgh: Resiliency Resiliency – “the capacity to recover quickly from difficulties; toughness” • 250 Year History • Strategically critical in Western Expansion and Industrial Revolution • Renaissance 1 - (1945 to 1975) • The “Iron City” begets the “Smokey City” Post War Investment in Downtown Pittsburgh – “Golden Triangle” • Point Park, Gateway Center, Mellon Square • Coordinated Urban Planning / Economic Development efforts • Renaissance 2 – (1975 to 2005) • Ramped up downtown investment • US Steel Tower, One Oxford Center, PPG Place, DL Convention Center • Fifth Avenue Place, PNC Park • Early adopter of clean air standards • Renaissance 3 – (2005 to ????) • Economy in transition (→ Tech, Energy, Healthcare, Education) • PPG Paints Arena, Heinz Field, PNC Tower, North Shore Development • Eco-Innovation Districts, Sustainability • Penguins “Center for Energy” Proprietary and Confidential Information 3 Evolving DE Systems Landscape Pittsburgh: Community & Connectedness • Rivers, Roads & Bridges • Neighborhoods • Family & Tradition • Sports Teams •
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 50 Years
    Financial Report 2018 Celebrating 50 Years 1 Financial Report 2018 This year, we honor the foundation that made us who we are today. We pay tribute to the innovations and innovators who have transformed education, our society and our world. We empower our students, alumni, faculty and staff, whose ingenuity will impact our daily lives in ways we cannot yet imagine. This year, we celebrate the founder in all of us. CONTENTS 4 Facts and Figures 5 Report of Independent Auditors and Consolidated Financial Statements 6 Report of Independent Auditors 7 Consolidated Statements of Financial Position 8 Consolidated Statements of Activities 10 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 11 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 47 2017-2018 Board of Trustees FACTS AND FIGURES Type of University Athletics3 Private, global research, granting over 4,600 bachelor’s, Team name is “The Tartans”; NCAA Division III master’s and doctorate degrees each year. classification; founding member of the University Athletic Association; 19 varsity sports; over 25 club sports; and Colleges and Schools over 45 intramural activities. College of Engineering College of Fine Arts History Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences Founded in 1900 by industrialist and philanthropist Heinz College of Information Systems and Public Policy Andrew Carnegie as a technical school for working-class Mellon College of Science Pittsburgh; became Carnegie Institute of Technology School of Computer Science in 1912; merged with the Mellon Institute in 1967 to Tepper School of Business become Carnegie Mellon University. Number of Students1 Physical Size1 6,804 undergraduates, 5,637 master’s and 1,945 148-acre Pittsburgh campus; 118 campus-owned doctoral students, and 142 non-degree students buildings; two branch campuses.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Financial Report 2020 [PDF]
    FINANCIAL 20 REPORT 20 1 20 20 FINANCIAL REPORT Carnegie Mellon is a place where the best minds collaborate across boundaries, borders and disciplines to solve the world’s most pressing and perplexing problems. That passion and curiosity have never been more important than they are today as we navigate the ever- evolving landscape that comes with a world health crisis, a defining cultural movement and widespread economic decline. Fortunately, challenges have never deterred us. They only serve to embolden us, to incite new ideas and to take the unconventional risks that yield innovative results, setting what we once thought unobtainable squarely within our reach. CONTENTS 4 Facts and Figures 5 Independent Auditors’ Report and Consolidated Financial Statements 6 Independent Auditors’ Report 7 Consolidated Statements of Financial Position 8 Consolidated Statements of Activities 10 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 11 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 38 2019-2020 Board of Trustees FACTS AND FIGURES ATHLETICS Team name is “The Tartans”; NCAA Division III classification; founding member of the University Athletic Association; 19 varsity sports teams; 46 clubs and intramural sports. INNOVATION CMU is a global leader bringing groundbreaking ideas to market and creating successful startup businesses. Our award-winning faculty are renowned for working closely with students to solve major scientific, technological and societal challenges. We put a strong emphasis on creating things — TYPE OF UNIVERSITY from art to robots. We have become a model for economic A private, global research university development in forming partnerships with companies such granting about 5,030 bachelor’s, master’s as Uber, Google and Disney.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bellefield Boiler Plant Louis M
    THE BELLEFIELD BOILER PLANT LOUIS M. SUSANY, Manager A Review of the Origin, Expansion, and Modernization of the Plant and the Growth of the Steam Load it Serves The Bellefield Boiler Plant is a Long-Time Member of NDHA. Origin and Early History: 1904-1932 The original Carnegie Library and Music Hall, built in The boiler planr was completed in 1907, and occupies 1893-1895, was heated by a small boiler plant located with­ a site on the western side of Junction Hollow. It is of steel in the original building. In 1900, a large sum of money frame construction, with brick exterior walls. The original was donated by Mr. Andrew Carnegie for the purpose of structure, which remained unchanged until the current ex­ greatly expanding the facilities of the Carnegie Library pansion in 1965-66, is approximately 150 ft long by 65 ft Building. The new consrruction enlarged the Library, added wide, with a height of 70 ft from grade ro eave. the foyer t0 the Music Hall, and expanded the facilities tO A siding from the adjacent Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, include the Museum, Art Galleries, and the large Hall of which runs through the Hollow, serves the boiler plant. Architecture and Sculpture. (Fig. 1). Coal is delivered via a siding inro the south end of the This huge educational and cultural complex of libraries, building, where railroad car platform scales weigh in the music hall, museum, and art gaUeries occupies land donated coal, which is dumped direct from rhe cars into a receiving by the Ciry of Pirrsburgh, and extends for 440 ft along hopper.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BOARD of PUBLIC Educatltom AGENDA
    THE BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATltOM PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15213 Administration Buf idling 341 South Bellefield Avenue September 26,2007 AGENDA ROLL CALL Approval of the Minutes of the Meeting of August 22,2007 Announcement of Executive Sessions Committee Reports 1. Co~nmittee011 Education Roll Call 2. Committee on BusinessiFinance Roll Call Pcrso~tcteERapcrt 3. Personnel Report of the Superintendent of Schools Roll Call Financial Matters 4. Budget Transfer Roll Call Financial Statement and Controller's Report on the Status of Appropriations New Business Roll Call(s) We are an equal rights and opportunity school district. EXECUTIVE SESSIONS Legislative Meeting of September 26,2007 In addition to executive sessions announced at the legislative meeting of August 22, 2007, the Board met in executive session on September 17, and immediately before this legislative meeting to discuss various personnel matters that may include, but are not limited to: update on contract negotiations and positions opened and closed. Finally, at the executive session immediately before this legislative meeting, the Board discussed student discipline cases that involved violations of various portions of the Code of Student Conduct. The Board does not vote at executive sessions. Legislative Meeting COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION September 26,2007 DIRECTORS: The Committee on Education recommends the adoption of the following resolutions, that the proper officers of the Board be authorized to enter into contracts relating to those resolutions and that authority be given to the staff to change account numbers, the periods of performance, and such other details as may be necessary to carry out the intent of the resolution, so long as the total amount of money carried in the resolution is not exceeded.
    [Show full text]
  • This Offering Memorandum Provides Information on the Notes. for Convenience, Selected Information Is Presented on This Cover Page
    Book-Entry Only Form Rating: S&P “A-1+” See “RATING” herein This Offering Memorandum provides information on the Notes. For convenience, selected information is presented on this cover page. To make an informed decision regarding the Notes, a prospective investor should read this Offering Memorandum in its entirety. Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms have the meanings given in this Offering Memorandum. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY TAXABLE COMMERCIAL PAPER NOTES Not to exceed $70,000,000 BofA Merrill Lynch, Dealer Taxable Commercial Paper The Taxable Commercial Paper Notes (the “Notes”) will be issued by Carnegie Mellon University (the “University”), as fully-registered notes and, when initially issued, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC, which will act as securities depository for the Notes. Purchases of beneficial ownership interests in the Notes will be made in book-entry form only in the principal amount of $100,000 or any integral multiple of $1,000 in excess thereof. Beneficial owners of the Notes will not receive physical delivery of note certificates so long as DTC or a successor securities depository acts as the securities depository with respect to the Notes. Interest on each Note will be payable on the maturity date of the applicable Note. So long as DTC or its nominee is the registered owner of the Notes, payments of the principal of and interest on the Notes will be made directly to DTC. Disbursements of such payments to DTC participants is the responsibility of DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the beneficial owners is the responsibility of DTC participants.
    [Show full text]
  • CFA Student Wrecks Future Site for Tepper Quadrangle, Says It's
    KGB infiltrated by frightened Wean to become giant rat maze Drama student kicked out for actual KGB experiment wearing “the fugliest” sweater NEWS SCITECH PILLBOX thetartan.org @thetartan March 30, 2015 Volume 109, Issue 21 University students hold CFA student wrecks vigil outside PHI location future site for Tepper Quadrangle, says it’s art Anne-Sophie Kim/Photoshop Wizard, unlike Brent Heard ELEANOR JAMES No one will ever forget ers opened a ritual bottle Is definitely not a pseudonym the unique mixed drinks of Bacardi 151 which, after being thrown down on the everyone took a ceremonial Last Friday, students and bar. The jolly rancher was swig, was then used to light faculty gathered outside a saccharine mixture. The the Natty Lite-based votive the building that was previ- buttery nipple was a bliss- candles. Having undergone ously home to Panther Hol- ful ride to a joyous drunken the initial rituals, the shar- low Inn, fondly known as bender. And no one will ing of the drunk stories be- PHI (pronounced like the ever forget Friday two-dol- gan. Many shed tears. Greek letter, NOT P.H.I. as lar well drinks. No one has Having commemorated Pitt kids will tell you). PHI shown such love to Carn- the many beautiful she- played a vital role in the egie Mellon students since nanigans PHI provided, the Carnegie Mellon communi- the “Thank You, Bill” cups. grief-stricken crowd began ty. 21st birthday? Go to PHI. And don’t forget all the the sacrament of beer pong. Failed an exam? Go to PHI.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2011
    UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Financial Disclosure Report Response to the Requirements of Public School Code of 1949 Amended by Act 61 of 2008 Section 25, 2004-D (A) – (D) Volume II For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Financial Disclosure Report Purchase of Services Contracts Purchase of Goods Contracts Notes and Definitions The following tables provide the required disclosures for purchase of services and purchase of goods contracts. The University’s Accounts Payable System does not include data enabling the distinction between purchases of goods and services. Thus, a single schedule is provided that includes both goods and services. Purchases are categorized in the University’s Accounts Payable System in one of the following categories: Facility Alterations Facility Operating Costs Insurance Library Acquisitions Mail Printing/Publishing Professional Memberships Professional Services Purchases for Resale Routine Maintenance Space Rental Supplies/Equipment Telephone Utilities Each entry provides the category into which the purchase falls, the name and address of the vendor, and the amount of purchase. There is no more than one entry per vendor for a single category within a responsibility center. Disclosures for defined projects or programs are included in the disclosure for the units in which they are administered. Purchases of goods and services in the Disclosure Report include those which equal or exceed $1,000 for each vendor from Operating, Auxiliary, and Non-Auxiliary funding sources. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 GHG Inventory
    University of Pittsburgh Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering FINAL REPORT Greenhouse Gas Inventory of University of Pittsburgh for FY 2017 May 29, 2018 By Dr. Melissa M. Bilec Associate Professor Haley Gardner Graduate Student Researcher TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Preface .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 5 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 8 2 Sustainability indicator management and analysis platform (SIMAP) ............................................... 8 3 Boundaries of the Inventory .............................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Organizational Boundaries .............................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Operational Boundaries ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE BOARD of PUBLIC EDUCATION of the SCHOOL DI.RICT of Pmsburgh, PENNSYL VANIA
    THE BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL DI.RICT OF PmSBURGH, PENNSYL VANIA MINUTES Meeting of: April 23, 2003 Call of the Meeting: Regular Meeting Members Present: Mr. Brentley, Mrs. Colaini, Mrs. Fink, Mrs. Harris, Mr. Isler, Mr. McCrea (via telephone), Mr. Matthews, Mr. Taylor, Mrs. Wood . Present 9. Members Absent: Absent 0. The following matters were received and acted upon. Actions taken are recorded following the reports. THE BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION PllTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15213 Administration Building 341 South Bellefleld Avenue April 23, 2003 AGENDA Recognition of Perry High School Basketball Team Approval of the Minutes of the Igleeting of March 26,2003 Announcement of Executive Sessions Committee Reports 1. Committee on Education Roll Call 2. Committee on BusinessIFinance Roll Call Personnel Report 3. Personnel Report of the Superintendent of Schools Roll Call Financial Matters Financial Statement and Controller's Report on the Status of Appropriations 4. Budget Transfer New Business Roll Call(s) We are an equal rights and opportunity school district. EXECUTIVE SESSIONS Legislative Meeting of April 23,2003 In addition to executive sessions announced at the legislative meeting of March 26, 2003, the Board met in executive session on April 1, April 14, and immediately before this legislative meeting to discuss various personnel matters, including but not limited to: new appointments, transfers, promotions, resignations, retirements, reassignments, terminations, sabbatical leaves, and positions opened and closed. In addition, at the April 1 executive session, Special Counsel discussed real estate matters and legal issues incidental thereto, and at the April 14 executive session, the Solicitor, Special Counsel and Outside Counsel discussed a matter in litigation.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Pittsburgh Cost Containment Efforts February 23, 2012
    The University of Pittsburgh Cost Containment Efforts February 23, 2012 - An examination and documentation of cost containment efforts within units of the University from fiscal year 2009 through fiscal year 2012. The University of Pittsburgh – Cost Containment Efforts TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Introduction Guiding Principles Cost Containment Strategies and Approaches Smarter Contract Negotiation Channeled Spending Program and Strategic Purchasing Assessing Services and Centralizing Operations Leveraging Information Technology Utilizing Digital Alternatives Achieving Energy Efficiency More Efficient Utilization of Space Greater Staff Productivity Adopting Smarter Strategies with Health/Retirement Benefits Other Revenue Sources Limiting Spending on Travel, Meetings, Events, Supplies, and Resources Conclusion APPENDIX 2 Executive Summary The University of Pittsburgh has made dramatic progress in its drive to ever-higher quality—in academic excellence, path-breaking research, community outreach, and all other aspects of this major public research university—even as it has controlled its expenses by creating efficiencies, cutting costs, raising revenues from federal research grants and private fundraising, and tightening its overall budget. In addition, Pitt continues to be a primary driver of the Western Pennsylvania economy. All this has been accomplished in spite of continuing dwindling state support. Pitt has continued to succeed in the face of state budgets that have severely eroded the Commonwealth’s original commitment to the University since it became state-related. The steady erosion of state support has resulted in reductions to Pitt’s appropriation in 8 of the past 12 years. Pitt has implemented a number of cost-saving measures including a salary freeze in FY 2010 for all staff and faculty (including senior executives whose salaries were also frozen in FY 2009) and canceled, delayed, or reduced the scope of as many construction projects as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2013
    UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Financial Disclosure Report Response to the Requirements of Public School Code of 1949 Amended by Act 61 of 2008 Section 25, 2004-D (A) – (D) Volume II For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Financial Disclosure Report Purchase of Services Contracts Purchase of Goods Contracts Notes and Definitions The following tables provide the required disclosures for purchase of services and purchase of goods contracts. The University’s Accounts Payable System does not include data enabling the distinction between purchases of goods and services. Thus, a single schedule is provided that includes both goods and services. Purchases are categorized in the University’s Accounts Payable System in one of the following categories: Facility Alterations Facility Operating Costs Insurance Library Acquisitions Mail Printing/Publishing Professional Memberships Professional Services Purchases for Resale Routine Maintenance Space Rental Supplies/Equipment Telephone Utilities Each entry provides the category into which the purchase falls, the name and address of the vendor, and the amount of purchase. There is no more than one entry per vendor for a single category within a responsibility center. Disclosures for defined projects or programs are included in the disclosure for the units in which they are administered. Purchases of goods and services in the Disclosure Report include those which equal or exceed $1,000 for each vendor from Operating, Auxiliary, and Non-Auxiliary funding sources. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    [Show full text]