DOCSLIB.ORG

Transit Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transit Review WELCOME TRANSIT REVIEW Agenda + 6:30 – 7:00 PM – Open House + 7:00 – 7:30 PM – Presentation + 7:30 – 8:00 PM – Question & Answer Session + 8:00 – 8:30 PM – Open House Please Sign In WELCOME TRANSIT REVIEW Agenda + 10:30 – 11:00 AM – Open House + 11:00 – 11:30 AM – Presentation + 11:30 – 12:00 PM – Question & Answer Session + 12:00 – 12:30 PM – Open House Please Sign In TRANSIT REVIEW WHY ARE WE HERE? Toronto’s population is growing and our demographics are changing. With growth comes challenges, including the need to invest We will be consulting via: in infrastructure to give people options for getting around, build a livable city and grow the Public Information Centres economy. Our transit system needs to support Toronto to: Pop-up events + Serve people; + Strengthen places; and Online survey + Support prosperity. Project website (www.toronto.ca/TransitReview) Changes have been proposed to how we plan for transit in this City. We want to make sure your voice is heard. Webinars / virtual meetings We’re planning a variety of consultation opportunities so that you know what the Social media changes are and have the opportunity to tell us what you think. TRANSIT REVIEW TORONTO’S TRANSIT SYSTEM The TTC network is extensive: +E very weekday, + It is the third largest +I t is a large, complex, +W ith the all-night + There is a high approximately 1.7 transit network in multi-modal system network of 27 bus and proportion of choice million rides are North America, with that is supported by 4 streetcar routes, it riders (e.g., people taken on the TTC roughly 85% of public an extensive network is the largest and who have access to transit ridership in the of 11 streetcar most frequent night cars but choose to Greater Toronto and routes and over 150 network in North use transit) Hamilton Area (GTHA) bus routes America TRANSIT REVIEW GROWING TRANSIT WITH TORONTO Our City and region are rapidly growing. 65+ Between 2016 and 2031, By 2041, Toronto is Toronto’s economy The concentration By 2021, our Toronto is anticipated projected to have represents 20% of the of growth in population of those to grow by over 1 a population of national GDP. Growth downtown Toronto 65+ will grow by million people, from a 3,913,000. in employment in the is expected over 59%, which population of 2.73 million City and Region is to continue. will increase the to over 3.76 million. expected to continue. Transit capacity need for transit and access to capacity and downtown from access. The growth in population and jobs and our changing demographics across the region is results in a growing demand for transportation capacity. We need to needed. make sure our infrastructure grows to accommodate these changes. TRANSIT REVIEW FUNDING THE TRANSIT SYSTEM All orders of government play a critical role in funding the transit system. This funding supports our ability to operate, maintain and grow the system to support Toronto’s transit needs. TTC Operating Budget and Transit Subsidies $2.1 Billion 67% $763 Million $315 Million $1 Billion 2019 TTC Provided by the 2019 City debt Total City of operating budget. City of Toronto payments to fund Toronto subsidy to subsidize the improvements that for transit, operations of the have already been funded through 2018 percentage of TTC TTC service* made to transit. taxes (including conventional operating (includes $92 million property taxes, costs covered by fares and in Provincial Gas Tax and Provincial revenues, making the TTC funding). Gas Tax). the most cost efficient transit * This represents the 2019 approved system in North America. combined net budget for TTC conventional and Wheel-Trans. Expansion and Maintenance of Transit in Toronto $33.5 Billion 70% $20-30 Billion TTC identified need for capital Of capital investment costs are Additional required for the City’s transit investments over the next 15 years currently unfunded. expansion needs over the next 10-15 (see TTC Capital Investment Plan for years to support growth in the City and more information). Region. TRANSIT REVIEW TRANSIT SYSTEM GOVERNANCE Transit planning, delivery, construction, operations and maintenance involves multiple organizations with roles, responsibilities and expertise that sometimes overlaps. Other GTHA Providers Establishes broad Provincial agency established Local planning authority An agency of the City of Other transit service direction for guiding through the Metrolinx Act, with responsibility Toronto with exclusive providers and operators growth in the Province 2006. for ensuring Toronto authority to operate local with authority to through the Provincial is a livable city. The passenger transportation. operate local passenger Policy Statement and The regional transit authority City has responsibility transportation in the the Growth Plan for for the GTHA with a mandate over establishing local Governed by a 10-person GTHA (e.g., MiWay, the Greater Golden to provide leadership in planning policies through Board, appointed by City York Region Rapid Horseshoe. coordinating, planning, the Official Plan that Council (four are public Transit, Brampton financing, developing and align with Provincial members and six are Transit, Durham Region Many ministries are implementing an integrated direction. City Councillors). Transit.) involved in implementing multi-modal regional transit the policies related to network, for the regional area Finances the capital Governance of these transit and transportation covering 21 municipalities. and operating costs of service providers varies planning. the TTC to provide local depending on the Operates GO Transit. public transportation. provider. Created Metrolinx as its regional transit agency in Governed by a Board with up 2006. to 15 members appointed by the Province of Ontario. What is Governance? Contributes to funding Toronto’s transit system. Governance refers to the decision-making structures, processes, policies and practices in place to support the delivery of transit needs to serve the City and Region. TRANSIT REVIEW MAINTAINING THE SYSTEM – THE TTC CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Why do we need to invest in our transit Benefits of Investing system? + More frequent service To take people where they want to go, we need: + Less crowding on key routes + Improved service reliability for customers More Capacity + Reduction of 1.7 million tons of CO2 Improvements to track, signals, power and stations will make it possible for Risks of Not Investing fleet to move through the system faster and more reliably. + Less frequent service and a decrease in reliability + More breakdowns of aging fleet, resulting in higher maintenance costs More Fleet + More delays, poor customer service and extreme A larger fleet of accessible subway overcrowding cars, buses, Wheel-Trans vehicles + Continued pollution and failure to meet climate and streetcars deliver the benefit of targets increased capacity to move more customers per hour. Over the next 15 years, the TTC needs to invest $33.5 billion in infrastructure for subways, buses, stations, streetcars and More Maintenance & Storage Wheel-Trans while making safety and security, accessibility and More garages, shops, carhouses sustainability top priorities. and yards to maintain and store the larger fleet. Seventy percent of the TTC’s Capital Investment Plan is currently unfunded. TRANSIT REVIEW MAINTAINING THE SYSTEM – SUBWAY INFRASTRUCTURE Subway Line 1 Key Investments Subway Line 2 Key Investments Investment Summary + Complete installation of Investment Summary + Required Investment Outlook 2019-2033 Required Investment Outlook 2019-2033 Upgrade tracks and Automatic Train Control infrastructure to support (ATC) 10% continued operation Fire 11% 10% Track,power and 10% Track,power and ventilation infrastructure Fire ventilation + Purchase 44 new subway infrastructure + Overhaul 30-year-old trains – a 50% increase in 7% trains to extend their useful New trains 8% the size of the Line 1 fleet 10% life by another ten years Subway trains Train overhaul 5% + Upgrade traction power to Automatic + Construct new Western $8.9 $9.1 Train billion support more trains running billion Control train yard for storage and 5% Rail yards on the line maintenance of the larger 2% fleet of Line 2 cars Other 62% 2% + Build a new train yard 28% Capacity enhancements Automatic Rail yards Train Control and repair and maintain facility in the north end to 2% accommodate larger fleet 28% Other Capacity enhancements Funded $2.1 billion Funded $2.3 billion Unfunded $6.8 billion Unfunded $6.8 billion TRANSIT REVIEW MAINTAINING THE SYSTEM – OTHER TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE Stations Buses Streetcars Wheel-Trans Investment Summary Investment Summary Investment Summary Investment Summary Required Investment Outlook 2019-2033 Required Investment Outlook 2019-2033 Required Investment Outlook 2019-2033 Required Investment Outlook 2019-2033 30% 32% 12% 61% Converting Hillcrest Complex Platform 27% 22% Wheel-Trans New buses (under consideration) Edge Doors Bloor-Yonge New and transformation Station upgraded capacity garages improvements 30% New $3.9 $6.1 $3.0 streetcars $318 13% billion billion Overhauling 4% billion million 24% buses Overhauling 6% Easier Access streetcars 24% Elevators & & accessibility Track & escalators Traction 88% 11% 4% 12% Power Wheel-Trans Other Other Upgrading buses carhouses Funded $1.2 billion Funded $1.7 billion Funded $1.1 billion Funded $143 million Unfunded $2.7 billion Unfunded $4.4 billion Unfunded $1.9 billion Unfunded $175 million Key Investments Key Investments Key Investments Key Investments
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Noise and Vibration Projects
    Frontop Engineering Limited 101 Amber Street, Unit 1, Markham Ontario, Canada, L3R 3B2 Telephone: (905) 947-0900; Fax: (905) 305-9370 Website: www.frontop.ca; Email: [email protected] List of Our Ongoing Noise and Vibration Monitoring Projects Project 1: Name of Project: Geotechnical Instrumentation and Monitoring Plan- Segment 1- Keelesdale Station Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Client: Metrolinx-Eglinton Crosstown Light Rapid Transit (ECLRT) Project Main project features: Geotechnical Instrumentation and Monitoring, Noise and Vibration Monitoring Activities performed: install and monitoring following instrument Prepared and installed six (6) real-time vibration stations and five (5) real-time noise monitoring station. And weekly attendant two (2) noise and two (2) vibration stations monitoring. Project 2: Name of Project: Geotechnical Instrumentation and Monitoring Plan- Segment 1- Mt Dennis Station Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Client: Metrolinx-Eglinton Crosstown Light Rapid Transit (ECLRT) Project Main project features: Geotechnical Instrumentation and Monitoring, Noise and Vibration Monitoring Activities performed: install and monitoring following instrument Prepared and installed four (4) real-time vibration stations and four (4) real-time noise monitoring station. And weekly attendant two (2) noise and two (2) vibration stations monitoring Project 3: Name of Project: TTC Wilson Yard Track and Structure Building Renovation (Contract AW1-3) Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Client: TTC Main project features: Track and Structure Building Renovation Activities performed: Prepared and installed the one (1) real-time noise monitoring station and one (1) real- time vibration monitoring station. Project 4: Name of Project: TTC Hillcrest Complex Surface Way Facility Replacement, and Harvey Shop Loading Deck (Contract M7-2 & M1-91) Client: TTC Main project features: Surface Way Facility Replacement Activities performed: Prepared and installed the two (2) real-time noise monitoring station and two (2) real- time vibration monitoring station.
    [Show full text]
  • July 10 Board Agenda
    Toronto Transit Commission Board TTC Board Members Josh Colle (Chair) Alan Heisey, Q.C. (Vice Chair) Rick Byers Glenn De Baeremaeker Joe Mihevc John Campbell Joanne De Laurentiis Denzil Minnan-Wong Vincent Crisanti Mary Fragedakis Ron Lalonde Special Assistance for Members of the Public: TTC staff can arrange for special assistance with some advance notice. If you need special assistance, please call 416-393-3698 or e-mail [email protected] Closed Meeting Requirements: If the TTC Board wants to meet in closed session (privately) a Member of the Board must make a motion to do so and give the reason why the Board has to meet privately. (Section 29 of the TTC By-law and Section 190 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006) Notice to people writing or making presentations to the TTC Board: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.O. 1900, authorize the TTC to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to the TTC Board. The TTC collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the TTC, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the TTC will become part of the public record and will appear on the TTC’s website. The TTC makes a video record of its Board meetings. If you make a presentation to the Board, the TTC will be video-recording you and the video record is available to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Transit Commission Relief Line South Toronto Transit Commission
    Toronto Transit Commission Relief Line South Toronto Transit Commission The engineering support services provided by GZ included Location: Toronto, Canada preliminary design of the temporary and permanent support measures for the SEM caverns in the swelling conditions as well Date: 2017 - 2019 design of the waterproofing system. In addition, GZ provided constructability reviews and value engineering studies for the stations, as well as for the alignment. Structure: 2 large diameter underground Station caverns Length: 4.66 mi (7.5 km) Geology: Georgian Bay Shale, glacial tills Cost: - Client: HDR Owner: Toronto Transit Commission Preliminary SEM Station Design: n 2017, the Toronto Transit Commission approved the I Preliminary Engineering Design of the Relief Line South Project, which was a planned new 7.5 km long subway line that was intended to run through the center of downtown Toronto. The project was to connect the Yonge-University-Spadina Subway (Line 1) to the Bloor-Danforth Subway (Line 2) in the downtown area. The goal of the Relief Line South was to help relieve Figure 1. Proposed Relief Line South arrangement with stations. crowding on Line 1 south of Bloor, at the Bloor-Yonge Station, and on the surface transit routes coming in and out of downtown. Construction planning of the Relief Line South included construction of twin running tunnels by means of tunnel boring machines, five new stations, and modifications to three existing stations, which will be converted to interchange stations. Design of the Relief Line South progressed to the preliminary engineering stage, and was consequently re-envisioned as the southern section of the Ontario Line Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Update on Metrolinx Transit Expansion Projects – Second Quarter 2021
    REPORT FOR ACTION Update on Metrolinx Transit Expansion Projects – Second Quarter 2021 Date: June 21, 2021 To: Executive Committee From: Executive Director, Transit Expansion Office and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Wards: All SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to provide a status update on Metrolinx-led transit expansion projects currently underway in Toronto, with a focus on the Subway Program (i.e., Ontario Line, Scarborough Subway Extension, Yonge North Subway Extension, and Eglinton Crosstown West Extension), SmartTrack Stations Program, and Durham- Scarborough Bus Rapid Transit. In particular, this report provides information that addresses several Council directives related to the Ontario Line and the Bloor- Lansdowne SmartTrack Station. City staff are involved in the planning, design, and implementation of Metrolinx transit expansion programs through activities such as reviewing technical drawings, developing required legal agreements, reviewing construction management and traffic management plans, and planning approvals, among many other activities. City staff will continue to provide updates to Council on these multi-billion dollar transit expansion investments as they develop. RECOMMENDATIONS The Executive Director, Transit Expansion Office and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning recommend that: 1. Executive Committee receive this report for information. Update on Metrolinx Projects – Q2 2021 Page 1 of 16 FINANCIAL IMPACT There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. The Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information. DECISION HISTORY In October 2019, City Council considered EX9.1 Toronto-Ontario Transit Update and authorized the City Manager to negotiate, enter into and execute a Preliminary Agreement with the Province and/or any other relevant provincial agency, in accordance with the terms set out in the term sheet in Attachment 6 to the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 4 – Assessment of Ontario Line
    EX9.1 Attachment 4 – Assessment of Ontario Line As directed by City Council in April 2019, City and TTC staff have assessed the Province’s proposed Ontario Line. The details of this assessment are provided in this attachment. 1. Project Summary 1.1. Project Description The Ontario Line was included as part of the 2019 Ontario Budget1 as a transit project that will cover similar study areas as the Relief Line South and North, as well as a western extension. The proposed project is a 15.5-kilometre higher-order transit line with 15 stations, connecting from Exhibition GO station to Line 5 at Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East, near the Science Centre station, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Ontario Line Proposal (source: Metrolinx IBC) Since April 2019, technical working groups comprising staff from the City, TTC, Metrolinx, Infrastructure Ontario and the Ministry of Transportation met regularly to understand alignment and station location options being considered for the Ontario 1 http://budget.ontario.ca/2019/contents.html Attachment 4 - Assessment of Ontario Line Page 1 of 20 Line. Discussions also considered fleet requirements, infrastructure design criteria, and travel demand modelling. Metrolinx prepared an Initial Business Case (IBC) that was publicly posted on July 25, 2019.2 The IBC compared the Ontario Line and Relief Line South projects against a Business As Usual scenario. The general findings by Metrolinx were that "both Relief Line South and Ontario Line offer significant improvements compared to a Business As Usual scenario, generating $3.4 billion and $7.4 billion worth of economic benefits, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
    The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Summary
    ln AvailableOn i e See introduction on next page for details. Service Summary November 23, 2008 to January 3, 2009 SERVICE SUMMARY – Introduction Abbreviations Avg spd..... Average speed (km/h) NB ............ Northbound This is a summary of all transit service operated by the Toronto Transit Commission for the period Dep........... Departure SB ............. Southbound indicated. All rapid transit, streetcar, bus, and community bus routes and services are listed. The RT ............. Round trip EB ............. Eastbound summary identifies the routes, gives the names and destinations, the garage or carhouse from Term ......... Terminal time WB............ Westbound which the service is operated, the characteristics of the service, and the times of the first and last Veh type ... Vehicle type 8 ............. Accessible service trips on each route. The headway operated on each route is shown, together with the combined or average headway on the route, if more than one branch is operated. The number and type of Division abbreviations vehicles operated on the route are listed, as well as the round-trip running time, the total terminal Arw........... Arrow Road Mal........... Malvern Rus............Russell time, and the average speed of the route. Bir ............. Birchmount MtD .......... Mount Dennis Wil ............Wilson Bus DanSub..... Danforth Subway Qsy ........... Queensway WilSub ......Wilson Subway The first and last trip times shown are the departure times for the first or last trip which covers Egl ............ Eglinton Ron........... Roncesvalles W-T...........Wheel-Trans the entire branch. In some cases, earlier or later trips are operated which cover only part of the routing, and the times for these trips are not shown. Vehicle abbreviations Additional notes are shown for routes which interline with other routes, which are temporarily 6carHT .....
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Annual Report
    ARNNUAL EPORT 2002 2002 ANNUAL REPORT Toronto Transit Commission As at December 31, 2002 Chair Vice-Chair Betty Disero Sherene Shaw Commissioners Brian Ashton Joanne Flint Norm Kelly Peter Li Preti David Miller Howard Moscoe David Shiner Letter from the Chair DATE: June, 2003 TO: MAYOR MEL LASTMAN AND COUNCILLORS OF THE CITY OF TORONTO It is with pride that I submit the 2002 Annual Report for the Toronto Transit Commission (the “TTC”). The year was filled with many unforgettable milestones. We opened the new fully-accessible Sheppard Subway line. We welcomed our 24 billionth rider. We delivered our services with the utmost pride during 2002 World Youth Day festivities. During the past year we also opened a new operating and maintenance facility – the new Eglinton Division and Garage in Scarborough – and achieved our 1,500th bus rebuild at Hillcrest Complex. By far, one of the most important achievements in 2002 was bringing the provincial government back to the funding table, and introducing the federal government to TTC funding - with its first major investment in the renewal and modernization of the system. The TTC was provided with $63.6 million in capital funding from the provincial government and $62.3 million for capital improvements from the federal government. In 2002, the TTC carried 416 million riders, or about 1.4 million passengers on a typical weekday, using an active fleet of 692 subway cars, 28 light rapid transit cars, 248 streetcars and 1,603 conventional and Wheel-Trans buses. The TTC is the only public transit authority in Canada that carries more than 400 million revenue passengers annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartometro Toronto Edition
    COCHRANE, VANCOUVER RICHMOND HILL, STOUFFVILLE AB C DEBARRIE FG HI J Maintenance and Storage Facility Water Tower City of Markham Morningside Brenyon Murison Version 1.0 h h tt Neilson p t : t //c fr p a e. :/ rto fre fr /c .metro. e. June 2016 art fre o . Burrows Hall TORONTO .metro Washburn Progress Markham Vaughan Metropolitan Centre Rapid Transit and Streetcar Network 1 Massie Shorting VMC Crossover Old Cummer Plan of tracks, platforms, yards, and extensions White Haven City of Vaughan McCowan 5 Brownspring Military Trail Brimley Legend Midland Ellesmere University of Toronto 1 Agincourt Scarborough Campus 1 Highway 407 Kennedy 1 Track / track number Allanford Finch Storage Track Birchmount Station platform 1 Finch Bay Mills Warden Pioneer Village Finch Crossover Platform oriented to single track Palmdale York University Pharmacy West Hill To be closed (2017) On-street stop without platform Pioneer Village 2 3 Crossover 4 Don Mills (2024) Scarborough McCowan Centre 1 2 York University 3 4 5 Closed / unused / never opened platform Don Mills Victoria Park 6 7 8 Crossover Consumers McCowan Crossover McCowan Yard 1984 Platform under construction 24/03/1985 Kingston / Morningside Midland Future station with funding allocated Leslie Bessarion North York Centre Lawrence Open air section 18/06/1987 Finch West Storage Track Bayview DD/MM/YYYY Bayview Ellesmere Crossover Oriole Opening date of section (2023) (DD/MM/YYYY) Extension under construction (opening date) Finch West 6 24/11/2002 Finch West Crossover Galloway Removed track 4 Sheppard-Yonge
    [Show full text]
  • Relief Line South Environmental Project Report, Section 5 Existing and Future Conditions
    Relief Line South Environmental Project Report Section 5 - Existing and Future Conditions The study area is unique in that it is served by most transit modes that make up the Greater 5 Existing and Future Conditions Toronto Area’s (GTA’s) transit network, including: The description of the existing and future environment within the study area is presented in this • TTC Subway – High-speed, high-capacity rapid transit serving both long distance and local section to establish an inventory of the baseline conditions against which the potential impacts travel. of the project are being considered as part of the Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP). • TTC Streetcar – Low-speed surface routes operating on fixed rail in mixed traffic lanes (with Existing transportation, natural, social-economic, cultural, and utility conditions are outlined some exceptions), mostly serving shorter-distance trips into the downtown core and feeding within this section. More detailed findings for each of the disciplines have been documented in to / from the subway system. the corresponding memoranda provided in the appendices. • TTC Conventional Bus – Low-speed surface routes operating in mixed traffic, mostly 5.1 Transportation serving local travel and feeding subway and GO stations. • TTC Express Bus – Higher-speed surface routes with less-frequent stops operating in An inventory of the existing local and regional transit, vehicular, cycling and pedestrian mixed traffic on high-capacity arterial roads, connecting neighbourhoods with poor access transportation networks in the study area is outlined below. to rapid transit to downtown. 5.1.1 Existing Transit Network • GO Rail - Interregional rapid transit primarily serving long-distance commuter travel to the downtown core (converging at Union Station).
    [Show full text]
  • TTC Ride Guide
    King-Vaughan Rd. Jefferson Sideroad 19th Ave. 19th Ave. 19th Ave. Woodstone 19th Ave. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Brookwood h ig Devons le 11 St. Subrisco Ave. TTC Surface Route Numbers and Names Coleraine Dr. Keele St. Bernard 1C Jane St. YONGE 'C' Leslie St. McCowan Rd. The Gore Rd. NEWMARKET 'B' Ave. 4 2 ANGLESEY 86 SCARBOROUGH Woodriver Mayfield Rd. 27 Warden Ave. Kennedy Rd. Bathurst St. Yonge Huntington Rd. 400 Weston Rd. 4 ANNETTE 87 COSBURN Dr. Nashville Kipling Ave. Pine Valley Dr. Rd. Bernard Woodbine Ave. Branch 5 AVENUE RD. 88 SOUTH LEASIDE 3A Teston Rd. Yorkland D Teston Rd. Bayview Ave. 6BAY 89 WESTON D Teston Rd. Elgin Mills 2 1C Elgin Mills Rd. Rd. W. •Rose Sat Elgin Mills Rd. 7 BATHURST 90 VAUGHAN 1A 8 Elgin Ride Guide Nashville Mills Rd. E. 9 BELLAMY 91 WOODBINE Rd. N. Taylor Mills 10 VAN HORNE 92 WOODBINE SOUTH 1C 2 1C 11 BAYVIEW 94 WELLESLEY Islington Ave. 3 49 N 12 KINGSTON RD. 95 YORK MILLS Countryside Dr. e w Dr. 96 WILSON Neal 14 GLENCAIRN 1A k . RICHMOND 4 i r S. Taylor Mills 15 EVANS 97 YONGE 8 k ve Crosby Ave. A 16 McCOWAN 98 SENLAC Yonge St. Pugsley e 1C 1C l Mill St. l 99 ARROW RD. i aughton Rd. 1A 3 3 17 BIRCHMOUNT lv N 4 R e c 20 CLIFFSIDE 100 FLEMINGDON PARK M Wright Dunlop d M . Roseh 107C,D St. 21 BRIMLEY 10th Line 102 MARKHAM RD.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Line Thorncliffe Park, Flemingdon Park and Science Centre
    Ontario Line Thorncliffe Park, Flemingdon Park and Science Centre ONTARIO LINE APRIL 2021 The Ontario Line 4 15.6 kilometres 15 stations As frequent as every 90 long seconds during rush hour 1 3 2 388,000 daily 40+ connections to boardings other transit options West Downtown 1 2 (Exhibition to Queen/Spadina) (Osgoode to Don Yard) East North 3 4 (East Harbour to Pape South) (Pape to Science Centre) 255,000 more people Up to 47,000 more jobs within walking distance accessible in 45 minutes or to transit less, on average The Ontario Line Faster commutes • A trip across the entire Ontario Line will take 30 minutes or less, getting you from the Ontario Science Centre all the way to Exhibition Place in record time. • From Thorncliffe Park, a commute to the heart of downtown would be 25 minutes instead of the current 40. Thorncliffe Park to King & Bay intersection: The Ontario Line Less crowding • The Ontario Line could reduce crowding by as much as 15% on the Less Crowding at busiest stretch of the 16% Eglinton Station TTC’s Line 1. • It would significantly reduce crowding at numerous stations across Less Crowding at the network, including at 22% Bloor Yonge Station the key transfer points shown on the right. Less Crowding at 14% Union Station The Ontario Line Environment Environmental Conditions Studies Environmental Reports Impact Assessment Archaeological Built Heritage Natural Noise & Vibration Resources Resources & Cultural Environment Landscapes Early Works Reports Environmental Conditions Report Traffic & Soil & Socio-Economic Air Quality
    [Show full text]