DOCSLIB.ORG

Not in My Backyard: Executive Order 12,898 and Title VI As Tools for Achieving Environmental Justice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Not in My Backyard: Executive Order 12,898 and Title VI As Tools for Achieving Environmental Justice October 2003 U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Not in My Backyard: Executive Order 12,898 and Title VI as Tools for Achieving Environmental Justice U.S. Commission on Civil Rights The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, bipartisan agency established by Congress in 1957. It is directed to: Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices. Study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. Appraise federal laws and policies with respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. Serve as a national clearinghouse for information in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. Submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress. Issue public service announcements to discourage discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws. Members of the Commission Mary Frances Berry, Chairperson Cruz Reynoso, Vice Chairperson Jennifer C. Braceras Christopher Edley, Jr. Peter N. Kirsanow Elsie M. Meeks Russell G. Redenbaugh Abigail Thernstrom Les Jin, Staff Director U.S. Commission on Civil Rights 624 Ninth Street, NW Washington, DC 20425 (202) 376-8128 voice (202) 376-8116 TTY www.usccr.gov This report is available on disk in ASCII and WordPerfect 5.1 for persons with visual impairments. Please call (202) 376-8110. iii Letter of Transmittal The President The President of the Senate The Speaker of the House of Representatives Sirs: The United States Commission on Civil Rights transmits this report, Not in My Backyard: Executive Order 12,898 and Title VI as Tools for Achieving Environmental Justice, pursuant to Public Law 103- 419. This report examines how well four federal agencies—the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of the Interior, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation—have implemented Executive Order 12,898 and Title VI. Execu- tive Order 12,898 requires federal agencies to collect data on the health and environmental impact of their activities on communities of color and low-income populations, and develop policies incorpo- rating the principles of environmental justice into their programs and activities. In this report the Commission assesses the efforts of these agencies to adopt, promote, and execute policies ensuring that environmental justice is incorporated into their core missions, whether affected communities are provided meaningful participation in environmental decision-making processes, and to what extent these communities have access to scientific data and effective Title VI enforcement procedures. This report, based on Commission hearings, interviews, research, and a review of relevant literature, reveals that while there has been some limited success in implementing Executive Order 12,898 and the principles of environmental justice, significant problems and shortcomings remain. Federal agencies still have neither fully incorporated environmental justice into their core missions nor established ac- countability and performance outcomes for programs and activities. Moreover, a commitment to envi- ronmental justice is often lacking in agency leadership, communities are not yet full participants in environmental decision-making, and there is still inadequate scientific and technical literature on the relationship between environmental pollutants and human health status. Although poor communities and communities of color are becoming more skilled at using Title VI administrative processes to seek recourse and remedies, agencies seldom, if ever, revoke a permit or withhold money from the recipients of federal funding for violating Title VI. Strong administrative enforcement of Title VI is required in light of court decisions limiting access to judicial recourse and remedies under Title VI. Uncertainty about the use and effectiveness of Title VI in protecting the poor and communities of color is created by the absence of final investigative and recipient guidance by EPA. The agency was moving toward finalizing its Title VI guidance at the time the Commission report was drafted, and we look forward to its release. The other agencies, unlike EPA, lacked any comprehensive Title VI investigation and recipient guidance. As a result, the Commission report makes many recommendations; some of the recommendations are directed toward federal agencies while others require congressional action. The report recommends, for example, that federal agencies coordinate and promulgate clear regulations, guidelines, and pro- cedures for investigating, reviewing, and deciding without unnecessary delay Title VI claims, and that federal agencies implement formal Title VI compliance review programs to ensure nondiscrimi- nation in programs and activities receiving federal funding. In addition, Congress should pass a Civil Rights Restoration Act to provide for a private right of action for disparate impact claims under Title VI, as well as § 1983. iv Although Executive Order 12,898 realizes the importance of gathering scientific and technical data, there is inadequate literature on the relationship between environmental pollutants and human health. The Commission report recommends that federal agencies conduct and fund more research on human health and the environment and make data more readily available to affected communities. Addition- ally, federal agencies conducting or funding research on human health and the environment should consider race, ethnicity, national origin, age, gender, and income when examining the environmental and human health effects of environmental decisions. The report finds that the input of communities of color and low-income communities is integral to decision-making, planning, monitoring, problem-solving, and implementation and evaluation of envi- ronmental policies and practices. Low-income and minority communities, however, still do not fully participate in the process because of language and cultural barriers and lack of access to information. Federal agencies must make early and meaningful public participation in siting and permitting deci- sions a reality for overburdened communities of color and poor communities. This may be facilitated by making resources available to communities for outreach workers and translation services when English is not the primary language in the affected communities, and by federal agencies and their funding recipients conducting assessments to determine to what extent their programs and initiatives result in increased public participation. Stringent enforcement of public participation should be guar- anteed in legislation with requirements ensuring that all affected parties are at the table with adequate public support. Federal agencies must more fully integrate environmental justice into their core missions and put in place evaluation criteria and accountability measures to assess policies and programs. Without more concerted effort on the part of federal agencies to promote and ensure environmental justice, and ap- propriate congressional action, minority and low-income communities all across this nation will con- tinue to bear the unfair risk of exposure to environmental hazards. For the Commissioners, Mary Frances Berry Chairperson v Acknowledgements The Commission hearings were organized and the report written under the supervision of Deputy Gen- eral Counsel Debra A. Carr. Pre-hearing research, planning, and investigation were conducted by attor- ney-advisors Peter Reilly,* Jenny Park, Deborah Reid, and Kim Norris,* with assistance from Emma Monroig. Office of General Counsel secretary Pam Moye provided clerical support for the hearings. The report was written by attorney-advisors Jenny Park and Deborah Reid, and senior attorney-advisor Deborah Vagins. Former Office of General Counsel law interns Hillary E. Browne, Gregory Francisco Gillett, Gilbert Gonzales, Elaine Orosco-Hammond, Kristopher Kirkwood, Tracy Lashley, and Erika Thomas provided editing and research assistance. Editorial Review Board members for the report were Latrice Foshee, Farella Robinson, and Constance M. Davis. Dawn Sweet, editor, prepared the report for publication. The Commission acknowledges with gratitude the tremendous contributions of the hearing panelists and others who provided their expertise to this important project. * No longer with the Commission [blank page] vii Contents Chapter 1: Introduction................................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 2: What Is Environmental Justice? ........................................................................................... 13 Communities Affected by Environmental Decision-Making ...................................................................... 17 Adverse Health Impact.................................................................................................................................. 20 Environmental Justice and Economic Opportunity.....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE and the REMEDIATION of LAND Emma Lees* Keywords: Contamination, Environmental Liability, Polluter Pa
    THE POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE AND THE REMEDIATION OF LAND Emma Lees* Keywords: contamination, environmental liability, polluter pays principle Abstract The Environmental Liability Directive attempts to provide a harmonising framework for liability for environmental damage within the European Union on the basis of the polluter pays principle. This article considers legislation in place in the Member States which sit alongside provisions based on the ELD. It shows that such regimes rely on different models for liability, which require, in turn, fundamentally different understandings as to how the polluter pays principle can work as a principle of liability. It considers provisions in place in Denmark, the United Kingdom, the Walloon Region, the Netherlands, and Germany. The differences between these systems are not differences of degree, nor are they mere technicalities, rather they represent a significant challenge not only to the goals of the ELD, but to the principles underpinning it. By undertaking a comparative analysis of these systems, it becomes clear not only that the ELD sits uncomfortably with these “parallel” provisions, but also that this discomfort is not only one of overlapping and complex legislative provisions, but rather one of underlying justification for liability. ‘The purpose of the Environmental Liability Directive (“ELD”) is to establish a framework of environmental liability, based on the ‘polluter-pays’ principle, to prevent and remedy environmental damage’ (European Commission, 2006, p. 1; A. Waite, 2006, p. 67). This goal is threatened by the variation in Member State liability for remediation of land which sits alongside the ELD in the Member States. When the legislation in Member States relating to contaminated land is examined, it becomes clear that the Member States prefer to extend liability beyond the liability of the polluter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neglected Question of Congressional Oversight of Epa: Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes (Who Shall Watch the Watchers Themselves)?
    THE NEGLECTED QUESTION OF CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT OF EPA: QUIS CUSTODIET IPSOS CUSTODES (WHO SHALL WATCH THE WATCHERS THEMSELVES)? RICHARD J. LAZARUS* I INTRODUCTION The United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") and the federal environmental protection laws within its charge have received much attention in the literature during the past twenty years. Commentators have frequently considered the relationship of EPA to the courts, including the advantages and disadvantages of both more and less exacting judicial review of agency decisions.' Scholars have likewise periodically examined the peculiar way in which Congress has drafted the federal environmental protection laws to ensure their achievement of policy goals. 2 These laws have Copyright © 1991 by Law and Contemporary Problems * Associate Professor of Law, Washington University, St. Louis. In my plenary review of EPA's first twenty years, reproduced later in this volume, I describe more fully the collision of institutional forces (including those unleashed by Congress) that have surrounded EPA, why they developed, and how they have affected both EPA and the evolution of federal environmental law. See RichardJ. Lazarus, The Tragedy of Distrust in the Implementation of Federal EnvironmentalLaw, 54 L & Contemp Probs 311 (Autumn 1991). This article explores in greater depth the causes and effects of congressional oversight of EPA, a specific topic for discussion at the Symposium on EPA sponsored by the Duke University and Washington University Schools of Law in November 1990. The article benefitted greatly from the comments I received at the symposium, especially those offered by Joel Aberbach, Don Elliott, Anne Shields, and Steve Shimberg. Kathleen Lindenberger and Cathy Varley provided valuable research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIX Shell Programming (15CS35) Solution Internal Assessment
    UNIX Shell Programming (15CS35) Solution Internal Assessment- II November - 2016 1. Explain significance of following commands (2x5=10 M) i. cp ?????? progs Wild card ? matches any single character, hence the above command (cp) copies files whose names are six in length to progs directory ii. ls *.[xyz]* Wild card * matches any number of characters, hence the above command (ls) lists all the files having extension as either x, or y or z. iii. ls jones[0-9][0- 9][0-9] In the above command the character class[0-9] matches any digit between 0 to 9. Hence the above command lists all the files beginning with jones and having last three characters as any digit between 0 to 9. iv. echo * The above command lists all the file in the current directory. v. cp foo foo* The above command copies the file foo to file called foo*. Here the wild card * loses its meaning. 1. Write UNIX commands for the following (2 X 5= 10 M) i. Find and replace all the occurrences of unix with UNIX in the file after confirming the user. : 1,$s/unix/UNIX/gc ii. List all the files in the current directory which names are having exactly 5 characters and any number of characters in their extension. ls ?????.* iii. Copy all files stored in /home/vtu with .c, .cpp and .java extensions to progs sub- directory in current directory cp /home/vtu/*.{c,cpp,java} ./progs iv. Delete all files containing agra or agar in their file names. rm *ag[ra][ar]* v.
    [Show full text]
  • Egan, Michael. "Subaltern Environmentalism in the United States: a Historiographic Review." Environment and History 8, No
    The White Horse Press Full citation: Egan, Michael. "Subaltern Environmentalism in the United States: A Historiographic Review." Environment and History 8, no. 1 (February 2002): 21–41. http://www.environmentandsociety.org/node/3107. Rights: All rights reserved. © The White Horse Press 2002. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism or review, no part of this article may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying or recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission from the publishers. For further information please see http://www.whpress.co.uk. Subaltern Environmentalism in the United States: A Historiographic Review MICHAEL EGAN1 Department of History Washington State University Pullman WA 99164-4030, USA Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT When a group of people is faced with both social and environmental subordina- tion, they are the victims of environmental injustice. This subordination is manifest in the disproportionate siting of environmental hazards in poor or minority communities and also in the inequitable distribution of ecological resources, both of which perpetuate the marginalisation of subaltern groups. At the heart of the environmental justice movement is a fight for the empowerment of subaltern groups, heretofore excluded from environmental decision-making. In recognising that the environmental health of their living spaces and families is critical to exacting any kind of improvement of their socioeconomic condi- tions, subaltern groups have added a dynamic new dimension to their social struggles. This counter-hegemonic struggle for ecological democracy is one of the fastest growing social movements in contemporary society, and requires the attention of environmental historians to situate it within the broader context of the history of environmentalism.
    [Show full text]
  • A Citizen's Guide to Using Federal Environmental Laws to Secure
    A Citizen’s Guide to Using Federal Environmental Laws to Secure Environmental Justice Copyright © 2002 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. All rights reserved. ISBN No. 1-58576-033-1. ELI Project No. 981624. An electronically retrievable copy (PDF file) of this report may be obtained for no cost from the Environmental Law Institute web site <www.eli.org>, click on “Publications” then “2002 Research Reports” to locate the file. [Note: ELI Terms of Use will apply and are available on site.] (Environmental Law Institute®, The Environmental Forum®, and ELR® – The Environmental Law Reporter® are registered trademarks of the Environmental Law Institute.) acknowledgement This project was supported by the Office of Environmental Justice of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Assistance Agreement No. CR82675501. The views expressed herein should not be attributed to EPA nor should any official endorsement be inferred. table of contents Chapter 1. Introduction to Environmental Laws and Available Resources ...............................35 Environmental Justice Funding and Other Assistance for Public Participation. ..35 Other Grants . ......................... ......36 Introduction to Environmental Justice Issues.............1 Program Funding ..............................36 How Environmental Laws Can Help You to Protect Your Community ...............................3 How This Handbook Can Help You to Use Appendix A - Summary Descriptions of Selected Environmental Laws to Your Advantage...............4 Environmental Statutes..........................39 How This Handbook Is Organized, and What It Covers . 5 What This Handbook Does Not Cover.................6 Appendix B - Overview of Additional U.S. EPA Community Grant Programs .....................83 Chapter 2. Understanding the Players and the Laws Appendix C - Selected Other Environmental Justice Resources ...............................87 Identifying the Players..............................9 The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of the Records That Petitioners Seek Is Attached to the Petition, Filed Concurrently Herewith
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PETITION OF STANLEY KUTLER, ) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LEGAL HISTORY, ) Miscellaneous Action No. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS, ) and SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS. ) ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF TRANSCRIPT OF RICHARD M. NIXON’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF JUNE 23-24, 1975, AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS OF THE WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE Professor Stanley Kutler, the American Historical Association, the American Society for Legal History, the Organization of American Historians, and the Society of American Archivists petition this Court for an order directing the release of President Richard M. Nixon’s thirty-five-year- old grand jury testimony and associated materials of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force.1 On June 23-24, 1975, President Nixon testified before two members of a federal grand jury who had traveled from Washington, DC, to San Clemente, California. The testimony was then presented in Washington, DC, to the full grand jury that had been convened to investigate political espionage, illegal campaign contributions, and other wrongdoing falling under the umbrella term Watergate. Watergate was the defining event of Richard Nixon’s presidency. In the early 1970s, as the Vietnam War raged and the civil rights movement in the United States continued its momentum, the Watergate scandal ignited a crisis of confidence in government leadership and a constitutional crisis that tested the limits of executive power and the mettle of the democratic process. “Watergate” was 1A list of the records that petitioners seek is attached to the Petition, filed concurrently herewith.
    [Show full text]
  • Moxa Nport Real TTY Driver for Arm-Based Platform Porting Guide
    Moxa NPort Real TTY Driver for Arm-based Platform Porting Guide Moxa Technical Support Team [email protected] Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................2 2 Porting to the Moxa UC-Series—Arm-based Computer ....................2 2.1 Build binaries on a general Arm platform ...................................................... 2 2.2 Cross-compiler and the Real TTY driver ........................................................ 3 2.3 Moxa cross-compiling interactive script......................................................... 4 2.4 Manually build the Real TTY driver with a cross-compiler ................................ 5 2.5 Deploy cross-compiled binary to target......................................................... 8 3 Porting to Raspberry Pi OS .............................................................9 4 Porting to the Yocto Project on Raspberry Pi ................................ 10 4.1 Prerequisite............................................................................................... 10 4.2 Create a Moxa layer for the Yocto Project..................................................... 11 4.3 Install a Moxa layer into the Yocto Project.................................................... 17 4.4 Deploy the Yocto image in Raspberry Pi ....................................................... 17 4.5 Start the Real TTY driver in Raspberry Pi ..................................................... 18 4.6 Set the default tty mapping to the Real TTY configuration ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Printing Printf: Formatted Printing
    Printing printf: formatted printing So far we have just been copying stuff from standard-in, files, pipes, etc to the screen or another file. Say I have a file with names and phone numbers. I would like to print it out with vertically aligned columns. (so my printout is not in the same format as the input file) File contents: Desired display: Bob 4929 Bob 4929 Chuck 4882 Chuck 4882 printf is a command from the C programming language to control printing. Shell script #!/bin/bash printf "Hello world.\n" a=`echo Hello world. | wc | nawk '{print $2}' ` printf "This phrase contains %d words\n" $a Run it alpaca.ceri.memphis.edu512:> printex.sh Hello world. This phrase contains 2 words alpaca.ceri.memphis.edu513:> #!/bin/bash printf "Hello world.\n" a=`echo Hello world. | wc | nawk '{print $2}' ` printf "This phrase contains %d words\n" $a We need the double quotes “ . “ to define an argument (the stuff inside the quotes) for printf. #!/bin/bash printf "Hello world.\n" a=`echo Hello world. | wc | nawk '{print $2}' ` printf "This phrase contains %d words\n" $a The argument in double quotes has - Regular text (“Hello world”, “This text contains “) - Some funny new thing - %d – a format specifier. - The already known specification for a new line - \n #!/bin/bash printf "Hello world.\n" a=`echo Hello world. | wc | nawk '{print $2}' ` printf "This phrase contains %d words\n" $a We also have another argument, the $a, which is a shell variable, at the end. Note that the items are delimited with spaces, not commas.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxic Temptation
    TOXIC TEMPTATION The Revolving Door, Bureaucratic Inertia and the Disappointment of the EPA Superfund Program Eric J. Greenberg THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY 1910 K Street N.W., Suite 802 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 223-0299 TOXIC TEMPTATION The Revolving Door, Bureaucratic Inertia and the Disappointment of the EPA Superfund Program Eric J. Greenberg THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY 1910 K Street N.W., Suite 802 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 223-0299 "Let the public service be a proud and lively career. And let every man and woman who works in any area of our national government, in any branch, at any level, be able to say with pride and with honor in future years: 'I served the United States government in that hour of our nation's need.'" - John F. Kennedy "To the extent that the public believes that people who move in and out of government are doing so in order to advance their own economic interest as opposed to representing the public interest when they are in government, that's not a good thing for society." -- William D. Ruckelshaus, EPA's first and fifth Administrator, 1991 "I've had it with patriotism: I'm into greed now." - Anne Gorsuch Burford, EPA Administrator, 1981-1983, to Regardie's Magazine, August 1984 The Center for Public Integrity is an independent nonprofit organization that examines public service and ethics-related issues. The Center's Reports combine the substantive study of government with in-depth journalism. The Center is funded by foundations, corporations, labor unions, individuals and revenue from news organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Just Environmentalism
    YALE LAW & POLICY REVIEW Just Environmentalism Brigham Daniels,* Michalyn Steele* & Lisa GrowSun*** Thirty years ago, the environmentaljustice movement emerged as a powerful critique of traditional environmentalism, which had largely ignored the distribution of environmental harms and the ways in which those harms were concentrated on the poor and communities of color. This Article calls for a similarly groundbreakingreimagination of both mainstream environmental policy and environmentaljustice: we argue that, to truly embrace justice, environmentalists must take account, not only of the ways that environmental harms uniquely impact vulnerable populations but also of the costs that environmentalprotection imposes on the most vulnerable among us. In this Article, we contend that both mainstream environmentalism and environmentaljustice have taken inadequateaccount of the costs and harms that environmental protection imposes on the vulnerable, particularlythe poor and communities of color. Drawingon examples from a wide variety of contexts-from the formation of nationalparks, to the protection of endangeredspecies, to regressive environmental taxes and regulations, to net metering policies that promote solar power-we demonstrate that there are many instances in which environmental Professor, BYU Law School. Associate Professor, BYU Law School. Professor, BYU Law School. The authors would like to thank Ann Carlson, Rob Verchick, Sarah Krakoff, Michael Pappas, Jim Salzman, Hari Osofsky, Holly Doremus, Blake Hudson, and the other participants at the Biannual Conference for the International Association for Scholarship on the Commons in the Netherlands, the Annual Environmental Justice Conference hosted by the Sydney Environment Institute in Australia, the UCLA Climate and Energy Workshop, and the Louisiana State University Conference on Emerging Issues at the Intersection of Energy and Coastal Environmental Hazards for their valuable feedback on the ideas in this Article.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruckelshaus Weighs in on EPA-Bashing
    Ruckelshaus weighs in on EPA-bashing Original Reporting | By James Lardner | Environment, Regulation March 9, 2011 — In 1983, Ronald Reagan needed a symbol of integrity to run the Environmental Pro- tection Administration and put the lid on a scandal involving its Superfund cleanup program. He turned to William Ruckelshaus, who had won the environ- mental movement’s respect as the agency’s first leader from 1970 to 1972, and then, in the “Satur- day night massacre” of October 1973, had resigned as Deputy Attorney General rather than carry out President Richard Nixon’s order to fire Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor who had taken the Wa- tergate cover-up more seriously than he was sup- posed to. Last week, Remapping Debate sought out the 78-year-old Ruckelshaus — who has also worked as an executive or director at various corporations, including Weyerhauser and Browning Ferris Industries — for some historical perspective on environmental policy and the way the EPA and other rule-making agencies are treated by elected officials nowadays. A lifelong Republican, Ruckelshaus endorsed Barack Obama for President in 2008, citing Obama’s campaign commitment to action on climate change as one big reason. Once upon a time the GOP supported environmental protections… Ruckelshaus’s memories of Washington stretch back four decades to a time when, as he recalled, “the Clean Air Act passed the House by 374 to 1; it passed the Senate by 73 to nothing. These were not partisan issues,” he said. “They have become much more partisan since.” He was quick to add that some of Congress’s habits, such as not giving an agency remotely enough funding to accomplish its statutory goals, are longstanding.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Approach for Environmental Justice Impact Assessment
    UCRL-JC-123630 PREPRINT A New Approach for Environmental Justice Impact Assessment oc-CI Cory H. Wilkinson, Gregg P. Brumburgh and Thomas A. Edmunds, Lawrence Livetffiore»N4tfl Laboratory (LLNL); Douglas Kay, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIQ^ \aath special acknowledgement to Diane E. Meier, LLNL This paper was prepared for submittal to the National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) 21st Annual Conference, June 2-6, 1996 Houston, Texas. March 1996 This is a preprint of a paper intended for publication in a journal or proceedings. Since changes may be made before publication, this preprint is made available with the understanding that it will not be cited or reproduced without the permission of the author. LLB421#v1.0(3/96) DISTRIBUTION OF THB DOCUMENT IS UNUNITED DLC- DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor the University of California nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or the University of California, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.
    [Show full text]